Optimization of Pickling Solution for Improving the Phosphatability of Advanced High-Strength Steels

materials

Article Optimization of Pickling Solution for Improving the Phosphatability of Advanced High-Strength Steels

Sangwon Cho 1, Sang-Jin Ko 1, Jin-Seok Yoo 1, Joong-Chul Park 2, Yun-Ha Yoo 2 and Jung-Gu Kim 1,*

1 Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon-Si 16419, Korea; [email protected] (S.C.); [email protected] (S.-J.K.); [email protected] (J.-S.Y.) 2 Steel Solution Marketing Dept., POSCO Global R&D Center, Incheon 21985, Korea; [email protected] (J.-C.P.); [email protected] (Y.-H.Y.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-31-290-7360

Abstract: This study investigated the optimum pickling conditions for improving the phosphatability of advanced high-strength steel (AHSS) using surface analysis and electrochemical measurements.

To remove the SiO2 that forms on the surface of AHSS, 30 wt.% NH4HF2 was added to the pickling solution, resulting in a signiﬁcant reduction in the amount of SiO2 remaining on the surface of the AHSS. The phosphatability was improved remarkably using HNO3 concentrations higher than 13% in the pickling solution. Furthermore, phosphate crystals became ﬁner after pickling with a HNO3- based solution rather than a HCl-based solution. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) data

indicated that the corrosion resistance of AHSS subjected to HNO3-based pickling was higher than that of AHSS subjected to HCl-based pickling. Fluorine compounds, which were involved in the

phosphate treatment process, were only formed on the surface of steel in HNO3-based solutions. The F compounds reacted with the phosphate solution to increase the pH of the bulk solution, which

greatly improved the phosphatability. The phosphatability was better under HNO3-based conditions than a HCl-based condition due to the ﬁneness of the phosphate structure and the increased surface roughness.

Citation: Cho, S.; Ko, S.-J.; Yoo, J.-S.; Keywords: advanced high-strength steel; phosphate coating; acid cleaning; electrochemical impedance Park, J.-C.; Yoo, Y.-H.; Kim, J.-G. spectroscopy Optimization of Pickling Solution for Improving the Phosphatability of Advanced High-Strength Steels. Materials 2021, 14, 233. https:// 1. Introduction doi.org/10.3390/ma14010233 Consumer demand for automobiles has been increasing over the last decade, with Received: 2 December 2020 particular regard for features such as appearance, driving performance, comfort, safety, Accepted: 30 December 2020 fuel efficiency, and environmental friendliness. In response, the automotive industry has Published: 5 January 2021 spurred the development of new and advanced technologies to improve safety while reduc- ing vehicle weight. However, the technology used to manufacture lightweight automobiles Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neu- is associated with environmental problems [1]. Research into automotive weight reduction tral with regard to jurisdictional clai- can be divided into the fields of lightweight materials and high-strength steel sheets [2]. ms in published maps and institutio- Studies on the use of lightweight materials for automobiles have mainly focused on alu- nal affiliations. minum and fiber-reinforced plastics [3–5], but the practical use of these materials is difficult due to product design limitations and manufacturing problems. However, high-strength materials can be used without making significant changes to conventional manufacturing methods, so they have the advantage of minimal additional investment costs. In addition, Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. Li- censee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. multi-material applications can be used with high-strength materials, depending on the This article is an open access article function of the component; thus, a variety of designs are possible. Another advantage distributed under the terms and con- of using high-strength materials is that reductions in the thickness and weight of the ma- ditions of the Creative Commons At- terial are obtained at the same time. Therefore, various grades of steel, from mild steel tribution (CC BY) license (https:// to advanced high-strength steel (AHSS), have been used in recent automotive bodies. In creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ addition, steel manufacturers are actively researching applications for more advanced steel 4.0/). sheets to further reduce the weight.

Materials 2021, 14, 233. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14010233 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/materials Materials 2021, 14, 233 2 of 15

Generally, a steel sheet for automobiles is subjected to a phosphate treatment to improve corrosion resistance and ensure coating film adhesion before painting [6,7]. Phos- phate crystals form on the steel sheet surface from the phosphate treatment, which greatly enhances the adhesion of electro-painting [7]. The size of the phosphate crystals and coating weight are very important factors: relatively small crystals result in the formation of denser phosphate crystals, resulting in better adhesion to the coating. During phosphate treatment, an acidic zinc phosphate solution reacts with the surface of the metal and consumes hydrogen ions in the solution. This reaction increases the pH near the metal surface. Then, the phosphate solution is saturated with zinc phosphate. As a result of the increase in pH, the formation of phosphate crystals is promoted. Therefore, phosphatability can be improved by an accelerator that increases the rate of hydrogen ion consumption on the metal surface [8]. Alloy elements such as Si and Mn are indispensable elements for obtaining high strength and high ductility. Therefore, AHSS has a higher content of these alloying elements compared to general steels. However, during steel manufacturing and use, Si and Mn oxides are easily formed on the steel surface. When these composite oxides densely form on the surface of a steel sheet, they have a significant effect on the phosphate treatment. In particular, a Si oxide film that forms on the AHSS surface acts as a barrier to phosphating, thereby decreasing the phosphatability [9]. Therefore, to improve the phosphatability of AHSSs that contain a large amount of Si, the formation of these oxides on the surface of the steel must be suppressed. Currently, two main methods are used to remove the Si oxide that forms on the surface of AHSS. The first method uses a high-temperature, high-concentration inorganic acid (e.g., hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, nitric acid, or formic acid) solution, which removes the Si oxide by dissolving the base metal under the Si oxide [10]. In this method, if the concentration of the inorganic acid is low, the Si oxide on the surface is not removed; conversely, if the concentration is too high, over-etching occurs and the material cannot be used in automotive manufacturing. Therefore, it is important to appropriately control the concentration of the inorganic acid. The second method utilizes hydrofluoric acid (HF) in a pickling solution to remove the Si oxide, using the following reaction:

SiO2 + 4HF → SiF4 + 2H2O (1)

This method does not use HF alone; rather, HF is mixed with an inorganic acid to activate its reaction [11]. However, because HF is very dangerous, it is challenging to use it in a pickling solution. To react with silicate, which is a basic form of Si oxide, F− is required. Therefore, many researchers have attempted to replace HF with ammonium fluoride – (NH4F) and ammonium hydrogen fluoride (NH4HF2) as a new source of F because they are eco-friendly and less hazardous than HF. NH4F and NH4HF2 have been used in a mixture with an inorganic acid solution; the etching rate can be adjusted by controlling the type and concentration of the inorganic acid [12]. Because NH4HF2 has more F than NH4F, its etching efficiency is better and its cost is lower; thus, it is suitable as a HF substitute. Although many studies on the phosphatability of AHSS have been carried out, some problems still exist, such as a decrease in phosphatability due to Si oxides. The phosphatability of AHSS under the conventional pickling conditions used in industry are not optimal; as shown in Figure1, the coating coverage and the coating weight are insufficient. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the optimum pickling conditions to improve the phosphatability of AHSS while minimizing environmental hazard. Materials 2021, 14, 233 3 of 15

Figure 1. Surface SEM image of advanced high-strength steel (AHSS) after phosphate treatment under the conventional pickling condition.

2. Materials and Methods The specimens used in the experiment were AHSSs with Si contents of 0.4 and 1.0, as described in Table1. The specimens were dipped in an alkaline solution at 45 ◦C for 2 min for degreasing before testing. The phosphate treatment process was divided into two steps: pickling and phosphating. As listed in Table2, the pickling solutions used in the experiment were prepared by adding 30 wt.% NH4HF2 to HCl and HNO3 at various concentrations (5.5, 8, 10.5, 13, 15.5, and 18 wt.%). Pickling tests were performed at 55 ◦C for 7 s. Then, after a degreasing and surface conditioning process, phosphate treatment was performed in a Zn–phosphate solution according to the common automotive process.

Table 1. Chemical compositions of the steels. (Unit: wt.%).

Grade C Mn Si P S 0.4Si steel 0.17 2.8 0.25 0.02 0.005 1.0Si steel 0.1 2.8 1.2 0.03 0.003

Table 2. Pickling conditions for the steels.

Conventional HCl-Based HNO -Based Parameter 3 Pickling Condition Pickling Condition Pickling Condition

Inorganic acid HCl HCl HNO3 Acid concentration 5.5, 18 5.5, 8, 10.5, 13, 15.5, 18 5.5, 8, 10.5, 13, 15.5, 18 (wt.%) Additives − NH4HF2 (30 wt.%) NH4HF2 (30 wt.%) Temperature (◦C) 55 55 55 Time (s) Within 7 7 7

Phosphatability was evaluated by coating coverage and coating weight. In an image obtained using the back scattered electron (BSE) mode in scanning electron microscopy (SEM; JSM-6700F, JEOL Ltd., Akishima, Japan), a difference in brightness existed between the areas where phosphate crystals were formed and where they did not form. The difference between the light and dark was measured to determine coating coverage using Image J S/W (Laboratory for Optical and Computational Instrumentation, University of Wisconsin). The coating weight was analyzed using energy dispersive X-ray ﬂuorescence (EDXRF; EDX-8000, SHIMADZU, Kyoto, Japan). After calibrating the P signal detected in a standard specimen of known phosphate coating thickness, the coating weight can be calculated by multiplying the measured P signal by density. The oxides that remained on the steel surface after pickling were analyzed using secondary ion mass spectrometry Materials 2021, 14, 233 4 of 15

(SIMS; TOF-SIMS-5, Ion-ToF company, Munster, Germany), X-ray diffraction (XRD; D/max- 2500V/PC, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS; JEOL JSM-6700F, JEOL Ltd., Akishima, Japan), and an electron probe micro-analyzer (EPMA; JEOL, JXA- 8530F, JEOL Ltd., Akishima, Japan). Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS; VSP300, Neoscience, Seoul, Korea) tests were performed with an amplitude of 10 mV in the frequency range of 100 kHz to 1 mHz. The electrochemical cell consisted of a three-electrode system. The counter electrode was a graphite rod, and a saturated calomel electrode was used as the reference electrode. The area exposed to the electrolyte was 1 cm2. The test solution was a cyclic corrosion test solution from the Society of Automotive Engineering (SAE solution), and its chemical composition is listed in Table3. EIS data were ﬁt to the form of a Bode plot, and Bode spectra were ﬁt to equivalent circuit models by using ZSimpWin software (Ver. 3.21).

Table 3. Chemical composition of Society of Automotive Engineering (SAE) solution.

Chemicals NaCl CaCl2 NaHCO3 (NH4)2SO4 SAE solution 0.05 0.1 0.075 0.35 (wt.%)

To analyze the pH change of the phosphate solution due to the oxides, 1 M of the iron oxides and the F compounds generated during pickling were dissolved in the phosphate solution. The change in pH was measured using a pH meter. To analyze the correlation between surface roughness and phosphatability, the surface roughness of the specimen after pickling was measured using an α-step (Alpha-Step IQ, KLA-Tencor, Milpitas, CA, USA).

3. Results and Discussion 3.1. Surface Analysis

Figures2 and3 show the amount of SiO 2 remaining on the 1.0Si steel surface layer as analyzed by TOF-SIMS and XPS after pickling with various solutions. Figure2a shows a conventional pickling condition, in which the amount of SiO2 remaining on the surface is larger and the distribution of SiO2 is more uneven than under the other pickling conditions. In Figure2b,c, however, in the pickling solutions with added NH 4HF2, the SiO2 on the steel surface was noticeably reduced, even though it was not completely removed. Figure3 shows that the intensity of the SiO2 peak in the pickling solution with added NH4HF2 was reduced compared with the intensity of the SiO2 peak under conventional pickling conditions. Thus, the amount of SiO2 remaining on the surface was signiﬁcantly reduced by NH4HF2-added pickling.

Figure 2. TOF-secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) images of SiO2 remaining on the 1.0Si steel surface after pickling under (a) conventional condition, (b) a HCl-based condition, and (c) a

HNO3-based condition. Materials 2021, 14, 233 5 of 15

Figure 3. XPS spectra of Si on the 1.0Si steel surface after pickling.

After the pickling of 1.0Si steel under various conditions, the surface was analyzed with optical microscopy (OM), as shown in Figure4. The surface of the specimen before and after HCl-based pickling was the same; however, after HNO3-based pickling, the surface of the specimen was uniformly covered with a new gray product. Figures5–7 and Table4 reveal the oxides that remained on the surface after pickling, as analyzed by EDS, EPMA, and XRD.

Figure 4. Optical microscopy (OM) images of the 1.0Si steel surface after pickling under (a) a

HCl-based condition and (b) a HNO3-based condition.

As shown in Figure5, the EDS peaks of O, Si, Cr, and Fe can be observed from 1.0Si steel under all pickling conditions, indicating that the remaining oxides on the surface were mainly Fe, Cr, and Si oxides. However, the F peak was observed only under HNO3-based pickling conditions. The results of EPMA analysis (Figure6) were similar to those of EDS: an F component was observed throughout the surface only under HNO3-based pickling conditions. This was largely due to NH4HF2, which means that the F compounds were formed on the surface only after HNO3-based pickling. XRD analysis (Figure7) indicated that the Fe of the base material was only detected in the specimens that underwent conventional pickling and HCl-based pickling. However, various components were detected in the specimen that underwent HNO3-based pickling. The products formed under HNO3- based pickling were (NH4)FeF5·H2O, FeSiF6·6H2O, FeF2, and/or FeF3. The products were produced by the following reactions [13,14]:

Fe2O3 + 5NH4HF2 → 2(NH4)2FeF5 + 3H2O + NH3↑ (2)

+ - Si + 2H + 2F + 4HF → H2SiF6·6H2O + 2H2↑ (3) 2+ - Fe + 2F → FeF2 (4)

FeF2 + H2SiF6 → FeSiF6 + 2HF (5) Materials 2021, 14, 233 6 of 15

Materials 2021, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 15

(a)

(b)

Figure 5. EDS analysis of the 1.0Si steel surface after pickling under (a) a HCl-based condition and Figure(b) a HNO 5. EDS3-based analysis condition. of the 1.0Si steel surface after pickling under (a) a HCl-based condition and (b) a HNO3-based condition.

Figure 6. EPMA analysis of the 1.0Si steel surface after pickling under (a) a HCl-based condition and (b) a HNO3-based Figure 6. EPMA analysis of the 1.0Si steel surface after pickling under (a) a HCl-based condition and (b) a HNO3-based condition.condition. Materials 2021, 14, 233 7 of 15

Figure 7. XRD analysis of the 1.0Si steel surface after pickling.

Table 4. EDS results of the 1.0Si steel surface after pickling.

Parameter Fe O Si F Cr HCl-based 94.13 3.77 0.85 − 1.25 pickling condition (%) HNO -based 3 92.25 1.98 0.85 3.56 1.36 pickling condition (%)

In the HNO3/HF system, FeF3·3H2O was in a stable phase at low pH (pH < 3.16) and then transformed into FeF2 and FeF3 at higher pH [15,16]. However, in the HCl/HF system, HCl made insoluble ferric ﬂuoride, preventing the formation of ﬂuoride precipitates [17].

3.2. Phosphatability Figure8 shows EPMA images of a cross section of 1.0Si steel on which a phosphate coating was formed. Under conventional pickling conditions, phosphate crystals were rarely formed; under HCl-based pickling, the areas where phosphate crystals did not form were sparse. However, under HNO3-based pickling, the phosphate crystals were uniformly formed. As shown in Figures5 and6, the F compounds found after pickling were not observed after the phosphate treatment. Therefore, the F compounds were involved in the formation of phosphate crystals. In other words, the F compounds introduced by pickling had a positive effect on the phosphatability of the steel. The phosphate treatment of AHSS was performed with various concentrations of hydrochloric acid (HCl) and nitric acid (HNO3). SEM images of the surface after phosphate treatment are shown in Figures9–12. When pickling was performed with NH 4HF2, more phosphate crystals were formed compared to with the conventional pickling. However, as shown in Figures9 and 10, phosphate crystals were not formed in many regions. Figures 11 and 12 show signiﬁcantly fewer areas where phosphate crystals were not formed compared to Figures9 and 10. Furthermore, the phosphate crystals became ﬁner after pickling with a HNO3-based solution than with a HCl-based solution. In addition, phosphate crystals were formed more uniformly on the surface of 1.0Si steel in both the HCl- and HNO3-based solutions compared to those formed on 0.4Si steel. Materials 2021, 14, 233 8 of 15

Figure 8. EPMA images of cross sections of 1.0Si steel formed with phosphate coating using (a)

conventional conditions, (b) a HCl-based condition, and (c) a HNO3-based condition.

Figure 9. Surface SEM images of 1.0Si steel after phosphate treatment under HCl-based pickling condition with HCl concentration of (a) 5.5%, (b) 8%, (c) 10.5%, (d) 13%, (e) 15.5%, and (f) 18%.

Figure 10. Surface SEM image of 0.4Si steel after phosphate treatment under HCl-based pickling condition with HCl concentration of (a) 5.5%, (b) 8%, (c) 10.5%, (d) 13%, (e) 15.5%, and (f) 18%. Materials 2021, 14, 233 9 of 15

Figure 11. Surface SEM images of 1.0Si steel after phosphate treatment under HNO3-based pickling condition with HNO3 concentration of (a) 5.5%, (b) 8%, (c) 10.5%, (d) 13%, (e) 15.5%, and (f) 18%.

Figure 12. Surface SEM images of 0.4Si steel after phosphate treatment under HNO3-based pickling condition with HNO3 concentration of (a) 5.5%, (b) 8%, (c) 10.5%, (d) 13%, (e) 15.5%, and (f) 18%.

Figure 13 shows the coating coverage and coating weight as a function of the HCl and HNO3 concentrations. Figure 13a shows that the coating coverage of 1.0Si steel decreased as the concentration of hydrochloric acid increased, whereas the coating coverage of 0.4Si steel increased as the concentration of hydrochloric acid increased. In addition, the coating coverage of both steels did not meet the phosphate quality requirements (95% or more) for automobiles. In the case of the coating weight, as the concentration of HCl increased, the coating weight of both 1.0Si and 0.4Si steel decreased. However, the phosphate quality requirement (2 g/m2 or more) for automobiles was satisﬁed at all HCl concentrations except for 18%. As shown in Figure 13b, the coating coverage was not uniform at HNO3 concentration below 10.5%, whereas HNO3 concentration of 13% or more showed excellent coating coverage of at least 98%. A HNO3 concentration of 8% was sufﬁcient to achieve the desired coating coverage for 0.4Si steel. However, 1.0Si steel does not satisfy the desired coating coverage. Therefore, at least 13% of HNO3 was required to meet the desired coating coverage. Furthermore, the coating weight was excellent at all concentrations. Materials 2021, 14, 233 10 of 15

Figure 13. Coating coverage and coating weight vs. the inorganic acid concentration under (a) HCl-

based condition and (b) HNO3-based condition. 3.3. Electrochemical Imedance Spectroscopy The results of EIS in the form of a Bode plot are shown in Figure 14. In the Bode plot, the low-frequency region is related to the surface film and the metal/surface interface, whereas the high-frequency region is attributed to the defects on the metal surface [18–20]. In the low-frequency region, the impedance (|Z|) values of 0.4Si steel were higher than those of 1.0Si steel. However, there was no significant difference in |Z| value with the use of different types of inorganic acids in both steels. The phase angle maxima and shoulder widths of the phase angles also showed the same trends as the |Z| values. The results of |Z| values and phase angle data indicate that the corrosion resistance of 0.4Si steel was superior to that of 1.0Si steel. However, there was no relationship between the concentration of inorganic acid and the |Z| values. Furthermore, improvement in corrosion resistance from the phosphate coating was not significant due to the short phosphating time used in the experiment. In general, the phosphate coating improves the corrosion resistance of a substrate. However, noticeable improvement in corrosion resistance is not observed during the stage of induction and commencement of film growth, which are the stages from the start of the phosphate treatment to 3 min [21,22]. Since the phosphating time in this study was within 2 min, the EIS results indicate that phosphate crystals had not sufficiently formed to be able to improve corrosion resistance for both types of inorganic acid. The phosphating industry generally uses coating weight and coverage as part of quality control, but coating weight and coverage do not have a direct relationship to corrosion resistance [21]. Therefore, the low correlation between coating weight, coverage, and the |Z| values was due to various factors, such as thickness and structure homogeneity. Materials 2021, 14, 233 11 of 15

Figure 14. Bode impedance plots of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) data of (a,c) 1.0Si steel and (b,d) 0.4Si steel in SAE solution.

The equivalent electric circuit model used to determine the optimized value for resistance and capacitance parameters is shown in Figure 15, and the corresponding EIS results are listed in Table5.R s is the solution resistance, CPE1 and Rcoat are the capacitance and resistance of the phosphate coating layer, CPE2 is the double layer capacitance, Rct is the charge transfer resistance, Qcoat and Qct are coating’s capacitance and charge transfer capacitance, and n is an empirical exponent (0 ≤ n ≤ 1) measuring the deviation from the behavior of the ideal electric capacity. Figure 16 shows the variation of coating resistance (Rcoat) from EIS measurement results as a function of inorganic acid concentration.

Figure 15. Equivalent circuit for phosphate coated steel in SAE solution. Rs is the solution resistance; CPE1 and Rcoat are the capacitance and resistance of the phosphate coating layer; CPE2 is the double layer capacitance; Rct is the charge transfer resistance; WE and RE are working electrode and reference electrode. Materials 2021, 14, 233 12 of 15

Table 5. Parameters from electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurements.

CPE1 CPE2 R R R Acid Steel Concentration s coat ct · 2 Qcoat · 2 Qct · 2 (Ω cm ) n (Ω cm ) n (Ω cm ) (µF/cm2) 1 (µF/cm2) 2 5.5% 62.98 56 0.8 1183 45.5 0.8 279.8 8% 72.35 149 0.7301 358.2 42.4 0.9004 1285 10.5% 63.58 178.3 0.5432 89.6 46.6 0.9395 1223 1.0Si 13% 70.29 189.3 1 1083 64.7 0.9535 1777 15.5% 67.04 108 0.8995 430.8 243 0.7957 673.2 18% 63.41 208 0.975 140.6 104 0.8421 1,287 HCl 5.5% 62.37 75 0.8419 1504 265 1 918.9 8% 70.87 8990 0.6406 145.9 49.1 0.8305 1168 10.5% 63.16 207.9 0.9996 940.4 45.8 0.8414 1878 0.4Si 13% 70.72 981 1 179.4 70.6 0.8408 1186 15.5% 62.67 179 0.8284 775.1 220 1 1320 18% 69.29 134 0.8182 819.5 153 1 1413 5.5% 60.91 476 1 367.8 157 0.8468 528.2 8% 66.97 120 0.8452 967.2 910 0.98 235.9 10.5% 70.41 74.2 0.8295 1227 14,200 0.9539 138.1 1.0Si 13% 61.01 186 0.8669 1059 250 0.8649 301.2 15.5% 72.76 266 0.6565 1066 204 0.8387 272.2 18% 73.47 300.1 0.8455 4300 397.7 0.9307 766.8 HNO3 5.5% 61.46 72.2 0.8527 1015 169 0.982 945.6 8% 70.7 209 1 892.6 65 0.8414 1525 10.5% 62.75 345 1 1332 108 0.8473 1680 0.4Si 13% 72.12 48.7 0.9522 1564 66.2 0.7682 1036 15.5% 65.98 29.4 0.8391 3812 2085 0.4284 690.9 18% 73.74 38.9 0.8746 2000 426 0.635 932.9

Figure 16. Variation of coating resistance (Rcoat) from EIS analysis vs. inorganic acid concentration.

Unlike the |Z| values, there was no signiﬁcant difference between the Rcoat of 1.0Si and 0.4Si steel. However, the Rcoat under HNO3-based pickling conditions was higher than that under HCl-based pickling condition in both steels, and Rcoat increased signiﬁcantly as the concentration increased under HNO3-based pickling conditions. This result is consistent with the coating coverage data shown in Figure6.R coat was affected more by coating coverage than by coating weight.

3.4. pH Measurement In general, during the early stages of phosphate treatment, the reaction of iron or iron oxide with hydrogen ions increases locally with the pH at the metal surface, which promotes the nucleation of phosphate crystals [8]. The effects of iron oxides and F compounds Materials 2021, 14, 233 13 of 15

generated under HNO3-based pickling on the pH of the phosphate solution, are shown in Figure 17. The pH of the bulk solution did not change signiﬁcantly when iron and iron oxides reacted with the phosphate solution. However, with F compounds, the pH of the bulk solution increased from 3.3 to 3.6 after reacting with the phosphate solution. Among F compounds, FeF3 has a pH of 3.5–4.0 when dissolved in water (Equation (6)) [23]. Therefore, this F compound could have increased the pH of the phosphate solution by reacting with water. This increase in the pH of the phosphate solution indicates that the F compounds had a positive effect on the phosphatability of the steel because F compounds act as an accelerator for consumption of hydrogen ions.

FeF3 + 3H2O → Fe(OH)3 + 3HF (6)

Figure 17. pH variation of phosphate solution before and after the addition of various iron oxides and F compounds.

3.5. Surface Roughness Measurement The correlation between the surface roughness after pickling and the phosphatability of the steel is shown in Figure 18. The surface roughness was higher under a HNO3-based − pickling condition than under a HCl-based pickling condition. This result is due to NO3 ions acting as oxidizing agents; thus, the corrosiveness of HNO3 is higher than that of HCl [24]. Generally, a higher surface roughness is associated with a higher coating weight and the formation of ﬁner crystals; a level of 0.76–1.77 µm was reported to be the most suitable average roughness (Ra) [21,25]. In other words, the phosphatability was better with HNO3-based pickling than with HCl-based pickling due to the surface roughness. However, the phosphatability did not have a signiﬁcant correlation with surface roughness.

Figure 18. Cont. Materials 2021, 14, 233 14 of 15 Materials 2021, 14, x FOR PEER REVIEW 14 of 15

Figure 18. Correlation between surface roughness and phosphatability; (a,,c) 1.0Si1.0Si steelsteel andand ((b,,d)) 0.4Si0.4Si steel.steel.

4. Conclusions Conclusions In this study, thethe optimumoptimum picklingpickling conditionsconditions to improveimprove thethe phosphatabilityphosphatability of AHSS were investigated using various types of surface analysis and EIS. The conclusions based on our investigation are as follows:

• With HNO3-based-based pickling solutions, the phosphatability improved remarkably at HNO3 concentrationsconcentrations higher higher than than 13% for bothboth steels. Furthermore, the phosphatephosphate crystals became finer ﬁner afterafter pickling with aa HNOHNO33-based solution compared to those with a HCl-based solution. • SiO2 waswas noticeably noticeably removed removed by a pickling solution with NH 4HFHF22. . • The corrosion resistance of phosphate-treatedphosphate-treated AHSSAHSS waswas higherhigher usingusing aa HNO33-based pickling condition compared to a HCl-based pickling condition.condition. • With HNO3-based-based pickling pickling solutions, solutions, F F compounds, compounds, which which are are involved involved in in the the phos- phos- phate treatmenttreatment process,process, formed formed on on the the surface surface of theof the AHSS. AHSS. The The F compounds F compounds reacted re- withacted thewith phosphate the phosphate solution solution to increase to increase the pH the of thepH phosphate of the phosphate solution, solution, thereby therebygreatly improvinggreatly improving the phosphatability the phosphatability of AHSS. of AHSS. • • The phosphatability was better under HNOHNO33-based pickling conditions than under HCl-based pickling conditions due to the increased surface roughness.

Author Contributions: Conceptualization, S.C. S.C. and and Y.-H.Y.; Y.-H.Y.; methodology, J.-G.K.; software, S.-J.K. S.-J.K. and J.S.Y; J.-S.Y.; validation, validation, Y.-H.Y., Y.-H.Y., J.-C.P. J.-C.P. and J.-G.K.; formalformal analysis,analysis, S.C.;S.C.; investigation,investigation, S.C.S.C. andand S.-J.K.; S.- J.K.;resources, resources, J.-C.P. J.-C.P. and Y.-H.Y.;and Y.-H.Y.; data curation, data curation S.C.;, writing—original S.C.; writing—original draft preparation,draft preparation, S.C.; writing— S.C.; writing—reviewreview and editing, and S.C., editing, S.-J.K., S.C., J.-S.Y., S.-J.K., Y.-H.Y. J.-S.Y., and Y.-H.Y. J.-G.K.; and visualization, J.-G.K.; visualization, S.C.; supervision, S.C.; supervi- J.-G.K.; sion,project J.-G.K.; administration, project administration, Y.-H.Y. and J.-G.K.;Y.-H.Y. fundingand J.-G.K.; acquisition, funding J.-G.K.acquisition, All authors J.-G.K. haveAll authors read and haveagreed read to theand published agreed to versionthe pub oflished the manuscript.version of the manuscript. Funding: This research was funded by POSCO, grant number 2017Z068. Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable. Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable. Data Availability Statement: Data sharing is not applicableapplicable to this article. ConflictsConﬂicts of Interest: The authors declare no conﬂictconflicts of of interest. interest.

References 1. Kulekei, M.M. Magnesium Magnesium and and its its alloys alloys applications applications in in automotive automotive industry. industry. Int.Int. J. Adv. J. Adv. Manuf. Manuf. Technol. Technol. 20082008, 39,, 851–865.39, 851–865. 2. [Tisza,CrossRef M.;] Czinege, I. Comparative study of the application of steels and aluminum in lightweight production of automotive 2. Tisza,parts. Int. M.; J. Czinege, Lightweight I. Comparative Mater. Manuf. study 2018 of, 1, the 229–238. application of steels and aluminum in lightweight production of automotive 3. parts.Machado,Int. J.J.J.M.; Lightweight Nunes, Mater. P.D.P.; Manuf. Marques,2018 E.A.S.;, 1, 229–238. Da Silva, L.F.M. Adhesive joints using aluminium and CFRP substrates tested 3. Machado,at low and J.J.M.; high temperature Nunes, P.D.P.; under Marques, quasi-static E.A.S.; Daand Silva, impact L.F.M. conditions Adhesive for jointsthe automotive using aluminium industry. and Compos. CFRP substratesPart B 2019 tested, 158, at102–116. low and high temperature under quasi-static and impact conditions for the automotive industry. Compos. Part B 2019, 158, 4. 102–116.Kang, J.; [Rao,CrossRef H.; Zhang,] R.; Avery, K.; Su, X. Tensile and fatigue behavior of self-piercing revets of CFRP to aluminium for automotive application. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 137, 12–25. Materials 2021, 14, 233 15 of 15

4. Kang, J.; Rao, H.; Zhang, R.; Avery, K.; Su, X. Tensile and fatigue behavior of self-piercing revets of CFRP to aluminium for automotive application. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 137, 12–25. [CrossRef] 5. Matheis, R.; Eckstein, L. Aluminium-carbon fibre-reinforced polymer hybrid crash management system incorporating braided tubes. Int. J. Automot. Compos. 2016, 2, 330–355. [CrossRef] 6. Fathyunes, L.; Azadbeh, M.; Tanhaei, M.; Sheykholeslami, S.O.R. Study on an elaborated method to improve corrosion resistance of zinc phosphate coating. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 2017, 14, 709–720. [CrossRef] 7. Kathavate, V.S.; Pawar, D.N.; Bagal, N.S.; Deshpande, P.P. Role of nano ZnO particles in the electrodeposition and growth mechanism of phosphate coatings for enhancing the anti-corrosive performance of low carbon steel in 3.5% NaCl aqueous solution. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 823, 153812. [CrossRef] 8. Tegehall, P.-E.; Vannerberg, N.G. Nucleation and formation of zinc phosphate conversion coating on cold-rolled steel. Corros. Sci. 1991, 32, 635–652. [CrossRef] 9. Nomura, M.; Hashimoto, I.; Kamura, M.; Kozuma, S. Development of high strength cold-rolled steel-sheets with excellent phosphatability. Kobeco Technol. Rev. 2007, 28, 44–48. 10. Jung, B.H.; Lee, K. Method and Device for Pickling Ultra-High Strength Steel Sheet. Kr. Patent KR101696117B1, 13 January 2017. 11. Park, H.K.; Nho, H.S.; Kwak, S.J.; Park, S.H. Method for Pickling Hot Rolled Steel Sheet Having Advanced High Strength. Kr. Patent KR20120074135A, 5 July 2012. 12. Lee, C.T. Non-HF type etching solution for slimming of flat panel display glass. Appl. Chem. Eng. 2016, 27, 101–109. [CrossRef] 13. Kraydenko, R.I.; Dyachenko, A.N.; Malyutin, L.N.; Petlin, I.V. The mechanism for production of beryllium fluoride from the product of ammonium fluoride processing of beryllium-containing raw material. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 135, 12–21. [CrossRef] 14. Pastushenko, A.; Lysenko, V. Electrochemical synthesis of luminescent ferrous fluorosilicate hexahydrate (FeSiF6·6H2O) nano- powders. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 8093–8095. [CrossRef] 15. Reddy, R.G.; Wang, S.; Chen, B. Solubility of iron in spent pickling solutions. Min. Met. Explor. 1993, 10, 102–107. [CrossRef] 16. Sartor, M.; Buchloh, D.; Rogener, F.; Reichardt, T. Removal of iron fluorides from spent mixed acid pickling solutions by colling precipitation at extreme temperatures. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 153, 50–55. [CrossRef] 17. Park, H.S.; Cho, J.H.; Jung, J.H.; Duy, P.P.; Le, A.H.T.; Yi, J. A review of wet chemical etching of glass in hydrofluoric acid based solution for thin film silicon solar cell application. Curr. Phot. Res. 2017, 5, 75–82. 18. Kim, K.H.; Lee, S.H.; Nguyen, D.N.; Kim, J.G. Effect of cobalt on the corrosion resistance of low alloy steel in sulfuric acid solution. Corros. Sci. 2011, 53, 3576–3587. [CrossRef] 19. Hong, M.S.; Kim, S.H.; Im, S.Y.; Kim, J.G. Effect of Ascorbic acid on the pitting resistance of 316L stainless steel in synthetic tap water. Met. Mater. Int. 2016, 22, 621–629. [CrossRef] 20. Kissi, M.; Bouklah, M.; Hammouti, B.; Benkaddour, M. Establishment of equivalent circuits from electrochemical impedance spectroscopy study of corrosion inhibition of steel by pyrazine in sulphuric acidic solution. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2006, 252, 4190–4197. [CrossRef] 21. Sankara Narayanan, T.S.N. Surface pretreatment by phosphate conversion coatings—A review. Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 2005, 9, 130–177. 22. Asadi, V.; Danaee, I.; Eskandari, H. The effect of immersion time and immersion temperature on the corrosion behavior of zinc phosphate conversion coatings on carbon steel. Mater. Res. 2015, 18, 706–713. [CrossRef] 23. Jones, D.A. Principles and Prevention of Corrosion, 2nd ed.; Prentice Hall, Inc.: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1996. 24. Kim, H.J. Variation of phosphatability with chemical composition and surface roughness of steel sheet. Surf. Eng. 1998, 14, 265–267. [CrossRef] 25. Meshri, D.T. Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology; Fluorine Compounds, Inorganic, Iron, 5th ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2000.