DOCSLIB.ORG

Solidago Missouriensis, Missouri Goldenrod 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Solidago Missouriensis, Missouri Goldenrod 2020 Fire Effects Information System (FEIS) Solidago missouriensis, Missouri goldenrod 2020 Figure 1—Missouri goldenrod colony. Photo by Peter M. Dziuk ©2014. Citation: Zouhar, Kris; Masin, Eva. 2020. Solidago missouriensis, Missouri goldenrod. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/forb/solmis/all.html 1 ABSTRACT Missouri goldenrod occurs in grasslands, shrub-steppe, and open and early successional woodland and forest throughout the Great Plains and the West. It is a perennial, clonal forb that spreads and regenerates from rhizomes that typically occur at depths of about 0.4 to 3 inches (1–8 cm) in the mineral soil, where they are likely insulated from the heat of fast-moving grassland fires. Missouri goldenrod is adapted to survive fire by sprouting from rhizomes and root crowns after top-kill. Smoldering fires in areas with high surface fuel loads may damage rhizomes and root crowns, although this is not described in the literature. It may establish from wind-dispersed seed or from seed in the soil seed bank after fire; however, seedling establishment seems rare. Most of the available literature that provides data and observations on Missouri goldenrod response to fire are studies conducted in tallgrass prairie communities, with additional studies from fescue grasslands, oak and pine woodland and savanna, ponderosa pine communities, Oregon white oak ecosystems, and southern Arizona mountain shrubland. Much of the information on Missouri goldenrod response to fire is anecdotal. Missouri goldenrod persists in plant communities with frequent—even annual—fires in most seasons. Many of the historical fire regimes in ecosystems where it is most common were characterized by frequent fires that occurred mostly during the growing season, but also in the dormant season. Differences in frequency, season, and severity of fire may affect postfire abundance of Missouri goldenrod, and these effects are likely to vary among plant communities, depending on the composition of associated species and their response to fire, as well as the frequency and intensity of grazing by wildlife and livestock. Some prairies and plains grasslands have a history of management with frequent prescribed fire, typically in spring, although precise timing and frequency vary, as does postfire plant community composition. Common objectives of prescribed burning in grasslands include increasing forage for livestock, reducing abundance of nonnative invasive plants, preventing establishment and spread of woody plants, reducing cover of woody plants, and increasing or restoring native plant diversity on the small, fragmented parcels that remain of these communities. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 6 FEIS ABBREVIATION .................................................................................................................................. 6 COMMON NAME....................................................................................................................................... 6 TAXONOMY ............................................................................................................................................... 6 SYNONYMS ................................................................................................................................................ 6 LIFE FORM ................................................................................................................................................. 6 DISTRIBUTION AND OCCURRENCE ................................................................................................................ 7 GENERAL DISTRIBUTION ........................................................................................................................... 7 SITE CHARACTERISTICS.............................................................................................................................. 7 PLANT COMMUNITIES............................................................................................................................... 9 Grassland and Savanna ....................................................................................................................... 10 Shrub-steppe, Woodland, and Forest ................................................................................................. 11 Riparian ............................................................................................................................................... 11 BOTANICAL AND ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS ...................................................................................... 12 BOTANICAL DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................................... 12 Aboveground description ................................................................................................................... 12 Belowground description .................................................................................................................... 13 Clone structure and life span .............................................................................................................. 14 SEASONAL DEVELOPMENT ...................................................................................................................... 14 REGENERATION PROCESSES ................................................................................................................... 15 Vegetative Regeneration .................................................................................................................... 15 Pollination and Breeding System ........................................................................................................ 16 Seed Production and Dispersal ........................................................................................................... 16 Seed Banking ....................................................................................................................................... 17 Germination and Seedling Establishment ........................................................................................... 18 Plant Growth ....................................................................................................................................... 19 SUCCESSIONAL STATUS ........................................................................................................................... 19 Grassland and Savanna ....................................................................................................................... 20 Woodland and Forest.......................................................................................................................... 20 Old Field Succession ............................................................................................................................ 20 FIRE ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT ........................................................................................................... 22 FIRE EFFECTS ........................................................................................................................................... 22 3 Immediate Fire Effects on Plant .......................................................................................................... 22 Postfire Regeneration Strategy ........................................................................................................... 22 Fire Adaptations .................................................................................................................................. 22 Plant Response to Fire ........................................................................................................................ 22 HISTORICAL FIRE REGIMES AND FUEL CHARACTERISTICS ...................................................................... 26 Historical Fire Regimes in the Great Plains ......................................................................................... 26 FIRE MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS .................................................................................................. 27 OTHER MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS.................................................................................................. 28 FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS .......................................................................................................................... 28 OTHER STATUS ........................................................................................................................................ 28 IMPORTANCE TO WILDLIFE AND LIVESTOCK .......................................................................................... 28 Palatability and Nutritional Value ....................................................................................................... 28 Cover Value ......................................................................................................................................... 28 VALUE FOR REHABILITATION OF DISTURBED SITES ...............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • And Festuca Campestris Rydb (Foothills Rough Fescue) Response to Seed Mix Diversity and Mycorrhizae
    University of Alberta FESTUCA HALLII (VASEY) PIPER (PLAINS ROUGH FESCUE) AND FESTUCA CAMPESTRIS RYDB (FOOTHILLS ROUGH FESCUE) RESPONSE TO SEED MIX DIVERSITY AND MYCORRHIZAE by Darin Earl Sherritt A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Land Reclamation and Remediation Department of Renewable Resources ©Darin Earl Sherritt Fall 2012 Edmonton, Alberta Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission. DEDICATION This MSc thesis is dedicated to my grandfather, Fred A. Forster, who instilled in me a passion for always learning, and for always reminding me that if you’re going to do a job, do it right the first time. ABSTRACT Rough fescue (Festuca hallii (Vasey) Piper (plains rough fescue) and Festuca campestris Rydb (foothills rough fescue) are long lived perennials that have been difficult to establish on disturbed sites. This research assessed the impact of seed mix diversity and suppression of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on fescue establishment.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Plant Propagation Protocol
    Plant Propagation Protocol for Carex inops ESRM 412 – Native Plant Production TAXONOMY Family Names Family Scientific Name: Cyperaceae Family Common Name: Sedge Scientific Names Genus: Carex Species: inops Species Authority: L. H. Bailey Variety: Sub-species: Cultivar: Authority for Variety/Sub-species: Common Synonym(s) (include full CAINI3 Carex inops L.H. Bailey ssp inops scientific names (e.g., Elymus CAINH2 Carex inops ssp heliophila (Mack.) Crins glaucus Buckley), including variety Synonyms for ssp heliophila or subspecies information) CAER5 Carex erxlebeniana L. Kelso CAHE5 Carex heliophila Mack. CAPEH Carex pensylvanica Lam. ssp. Heliophila (Mack.) W.A. Weber CAPED Carex pensylvanica Lam. var. digyna Boeckeler Common Name(s): long-stolon sedge or sun sedge (ssp heliophila) Species Code (as per USDA Plants CAIN9 database): GENERAL INFORMATION Geographical range (distribution maps for North America and Washington state) http://plants.usda.gov/java/profile?symbol=CAIN9 http://plants.usda.gov/java/profile?symbol=CAIN9 Ecological distribution (ecosystems it Found in shortgrass, mixed, and tallgrass prairies, as occurs in, etc): well as Ponderosa pine communities and other woodlands (Fryer 2009) Climate and elevation range Dry to seasonally wet climates. Occasionally found at elevations > 5000 ft.(Fryer 2009) Local habitat and abundance; may May dominate to co-dominate in some systems. High include commonly associated prevelance and persistance even in systems where it is species not the dominant species. (Fryer 2009) Plant strategy
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Site Description Section L: Ecological Site Characteristics Ecological Site Identification and Concept
    ESD Printable Report Page 1 of 56 United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Ecological Site Description Section l: Ecological Site Characteristics Ecological Site Identification and Concept Site stage: Provisional Provisional: an ESD at the provisional status represents the lowest tier of documentation that is releasable to the public. It contains a grouping of soil units that respond similarly to ecological processes. The ESD contains 1) enough information to distinguish it from similar and associated ecological sites and 2) a draft state and transition model capturing the ecological processes and vegetative states and community phases as they are currently conceptualized. The provisional ESD has undergone both quality control and quality assurance protocols. It is expected that the provisional ESD will continue refinement towards an approved status. Site name: Clayey / Pascopyrum smithii - Nassella viridula ( / western wheatgrass - green needlegrass) Site type: Rangeland Site ID: R058DY011SD Major land resource area (MLRA): 058D-Northern Rolling High Plains, Eastern Part https://esis.sc.egov.usda.gov/ESDReport/fsReportPrt.aspx?id=R058DY011SD&rptLevel=... 5/27/2016 ESD Printable Report Page 2 of 56 Physiographic Features This site occurs on nearly level to moderately steep uplands. Landform: (1) Terrace (2) Hill (3) Plain Minimum Maximum Elevation (feet): 2300 4000 Slope (percent): 0 6 Water table depth (inches): 80 80 Flooding Frequency: None None Ponding Frequency: None None Runoff class: High Very high Aspect: No Influence on this site Climatic Features https://esis.sc.egov.usda.gov/ESDReport/fsReportPrt.aspx?id=R058DY011SD&rptLevel=... 5/27/2016 ESD Printable Report Page 3 of 56 The climate in this MLRA is typical of the drier portions of the Northern Great Plains where sagebrush steppes to the west yield to grassland to the east.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts
    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory,
    [Show full text]
  • Grass Varieties for North Dakota
    R-794 (Revised) Grass Varieties For North Dakota Kevin K. Sedivec Extension Rangeland Management Specialist, NDSU, Fargo Dwight A. Tober Plant Materials Specialist, USDA-NRCS, Bismarck Wayne L. Duckwitz Plant Materials Center Manager, USDA-NRCS, Bismarck John R. Hendrickson Research Rangeland Management Specialist, USDA-ARS, Mandan North Dakota State University Fargo, North Dakota June 2011 election of the appropriate species and variety is an important step in making a grass seeding successful. Grass species and varieties differ in growth habit, productivity, forage quality, drought resistance, tolerance Sto grazing, winter hardiness, seedling vigor, salinity tolerance and many other characteristics. Therefore, selection should be based on the climate, soils, intended use and the planned management. Planting a well-adapted selection also can provide long-term benefi ts and affect future productivity of the stand. This publication is designed to assist North Dakota producers and land managers in selecting perennial grass species and varieties for rangeland and pasture seeding and conservation planting. Each species is described following a list of recommended varieties Contents (releases). Variety origin and the date released are Introduction. 2 included for additional reference. Introduced Grasses . 3 A Plant Species Guide for Special Conditions, found Bromegrass . 3 near the end of this publication, is provided to assist Fescue . 4 in selection of grass species for droughty soils, arid Orchardgrass . 4 Foxtail. 5 or wet environments, saline or alkaline areas and Wheatgrass . 5 landscape/ornamental plantings. Several factors should Timothy. 7 be considered before selecting plant species. These Wildrye . 7 include 1) a soil test, 2) herbicides previously used, Native Grasses .
    [Show full text]
  • City of Calgary Plant Lists Recommendations Based on Habitat Type and Desired Outcome to Inform Revegetation Work
    City of Calgary Plant Lists Recommendations based on habitat type and desired outcome to inform revegetation work 2019 Publication Information CITY OF CALGARY PLANT LISTS: Recommendations based on habitat type and desired outcome to inform revegetation work. INTENT: This document provides detailed information and recommendations to inform restoration plans as per the Habitat Restoration Project Framework (The City of Calgary Parks 2014) and provides necessary information and factors to consider during the plant selection phase of the project. PREPARED BY: The City of Calgary, Parks, Urban Conservation VERSION: 2019 Edition ADDITIONAL COPIES: To download an electronic copy: http://www.calgary.ca/CSPS/Parks/Pages/Construction/Park-development-guidelines.aspx INFORMATION: Corporate Call Centre: 3-1-1 (within Calgary) Copyright Copyright © The City of Calgary 2019 No part of this work may be reproduced by any means without written permission from The City of Calgary. Terms of Use City of Calgary Plant Lists must be used in conjunction with the document Habitat Restoration Project Framework (The City of Calgary Parks 2014), as referenced throughout, and is made available for use in The City of Calgary effective as of the date below. February 2020 The 2019 City of Calgary Plant Lists is presented as accurate and complete as of the date indicated above. Use of this document does not absolve any user from the obligation to exercise their professional judgment and to follow good practice. Nothing in this document is meant to relieve the user from complying with municipal, provincial and federal legislation. Should any user have questions as to the intent of any procedure found in this publication, the user is advised to seek clarification from the lead of Urban Conservation, Parks.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Assessment of Greater Sage-Grouse and Sagebrush Habitats
    Conservation Assessment of Greater Sage-grouse and Sagebrush Habitats J. W. Connelly S. T. Knick M. A. Schroeder S. J. Stiver Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies June 2004 CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT OF GREATER SAGE-GROUSE and SAGEBRUSH HABITATS John W. Connelly Idaho Department Fish and Game 83 W 215 N Blackfoot, ID 83221 [email protected] Steven T. Knick USGS Forest & Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center Snake River Field Station 970 Lusk St. Boise, ID 83706 [email protected] Michael A. Schroeder Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife P.O. Box 1077 Bridgeport, WA 98813 [email protected] San J. Stiver Wildlife Coordinator, National Sage-Grouse Conservation Framework Planning Team 2184 Richard St. Prescott, AZ 86301 [email protected] This report should be cited as: Connelly, J. W., S. T. Knick, M. A. Schroeder, and S. J. Stiver. 2004. Conservation Assessment of Greater Sage-grouse and Sagebrush Habitats. Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. Unpublished Report. Cheyenne, Wyoming. Cover photo credit, Kim Toulouse i Conservation Assessment of Greater Sage-grouse and Sagebrush Habitats Connelly et al. Author Biographies John W. Connelly Jack has been employed as a Principal Wildlife Research Biologist with the Idaho Department of Fish and Game for the last 20 years. He received his B.S. degree from the University of Idaho and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from Washington State University. Jack is a Certified Wildlife Biologist and works on grouse conservation issues at national and international scales. He is a member of the Western Sage and Columbian Sharp-tailed Technical Committee and the Grouse Specialists’ Group.
    [Show full text]
  • And Sand Bluestem (Andropogon Hallii) Performance Trials North Dakota, South Dakota, and Minnesota
    United States Prairie Sandreed Department of Agriculture (Calamovilfa longifolia) Natural Resources and Conservation Service Sand Bluestem Plant Materials Center (Andropogon hallii) June 2011 Performance Trials North Dakota, South Dakota, and Minnesota Who We Are Plants are an important tool for conservation. The Bismarck Plant Materials Center (PMC) is part of the United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resouces Conservation Service (USDA, NRCS). It is one of a network of 27 centers nationwide dedicated to providing vegetative solutions to conservation problems. The Plant Materials program has been providing conservation plant materials and technology since 1934. Contact Us USDA, NRCS Plant Materials Center 3308 University Drive Bismarck, ND 58504 Phone: (701)250-4330 In this photo: Fax: (701)250-4334 Sand bluestem seed that http://Plant-Materials.nrcs.usda.gov has not been debearded Acknowledgements Cooperators and partners in the warm-season grass evaluation trials, together with the USDA, NRCS Plant Materials Center at Bismarck, ND, included: U.S. Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service (J. Clark Salyer National Wildlife Refuge near Upham, ND; Wetland Management District at Fergus Falls, MN; and Karl E. Mundt National Wildlife Refuge near Pickstown, SD); South Dakota Department of Agriculture Forestry Division; South Dakota Department of Game, Fish, and Parks; Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Division of Forestry; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; USDA, NRCS field and area offices and Soil and Water Conservation District offices located at Bottineau, ND; Fergus Falls, MN; Lake Andes, SD; Onida, SD; Rochester, MN; and Pierre, SD; Southeastern Minnesota Association of Soil and Water Conservation Districts; Hiawatha Valley Resource Conservation and Development In this photo: Area (Minnesota); and North Central Resource Prairie sandreed seed Conservation and Development Office (South with fuzz removed Dakota).
    [Show full text]
  • COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Tiny Cryptantha Cryptantha Minima in Canada
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Tiny Cryptantha Cryptantha minima in Canada THREATENED 2012 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2012. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Tiny Cryptantha Cryptantha minima in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. x + 37 pp. (www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default_e.cfm). Previous report(s): COSEWIC. 2000. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the tiny cryptanthe Cryptantha minima in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 18 pp. Smith, B. 1998. COSEWIC status report on the tiny cryptanthe Cryptantha minima in Canada, in COSEWIC assessment and status report on the tiny cryptanthe Cryptantha minima in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 1-18 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Sue Michalsky for writing the status report on the Tiny Cryptantha Cryptantha minima in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. This report was overseen and edited by Bruce Bennett and Erich Haber, Co-chairs of the COSEWIC Vascular Plants Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-953-3215 Fax: 819-994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur la Cryptanthe minuscule (Cryptantha minima) au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Tiny Cryptantha — Source: Environment Canada 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • ISB: Atlas of Florida Vascular Plants
    Longleaf Pine Preserve Plant List Acanthaceae Asteraceae Wild Petunia Ruellia caroliniensis White Aster Aster sp. Saltbush Baccharis halimifolia Adoxaceae Begger-ticks Bidens mitis Walter's Viburnum Viburnum obovatum Deer Tongue Carphephorus paniculatus Pineland Daisy Chaptalia tomentosa Alismataceae Goldenaster Chrysopsis gossypina Duck Potato Sagittaria latifolia Cow Thistle Cirsium horridulum Tickseed Coreopsis leavenworthii Altingiaceae Elephant's foot Elephantopus elatus Sweetgum Liquidambar styraciflua Oakleaf Fleabane Erigeron foliosus var. foliosus Fleabane Erigeron sp. Amaryllidaceae Prairie Fleabane Erigeron strigosus Simpson's rain lily Zephyranthes simpsonii Fleabane Erigeron vernus Dog Fennel Eupatorium capillifolium Anacardiaceae Dog Fennel Eupatorium compositifolium Winged Sumac Rhus copallinum Dog Fennel Eupatorium spp. Poison Ivy Toxicodendron radicans Slender Flattop Goldenrod Euthamia caroliniana Flat-topped goldenrod Euthamia minor Annonaceae Cudweed Gamochaeta antillana Flag Pawpaw Asimina obovata Sneezeweed Helenium pinnatifidum Dwarf Pawpaw Asimina pygmea Blazing Star Liatris sp. Pawpaw Asimina reticulata Roserush Lygodesmia aphylla Rugel's pawpaw Deeringothamnus rugelii Hempweed Mikania cordifolia White Topped Aster Oclemena reticulata Apiaceae Goldenaster Pityopsis graminifolia Button Rattlesnake Master Eryngium yuccifolium Rosy Camphorweed Pluchea rosea Dollarweed Hydrocotyle sp. Pluchea Pluchea spp. Mock Bishopweed Ptilimnium capillaceum Rabbit Tobacco Pseudognaphalium obtusifolium Blackroot Pterocaulon virgatum
    [Show full text]
  • Plants of the Volusia Sandhill Herbaceous Plants Common Name
    Plants of the Volusia Sandhill Herbaceous plants Common name Latin name Plant Family Twinflower Dyschoriste oblongifolia Acanthaceae Carolina wild petunia Ruellia caroliniensis Acanthaceae Adam's needle Yucca filamentosa Agavaceae Cottonweed Froelichia floridana Amaranthaceae Pinelands milkweed Asclepias humistrata Apocynaceae Butterflyweed Asclepias tuberosa Apocynaceae Velvetleaf milkweed Asclepias tomentosa Apocynaceae Florida Indian Plantain Arnoglossum floridanum Asteraceae Silkgrass Pityopsis graminfolia Asteraceae Florida paintbrush Carphephorus corymbosus Asteraceae Goldenrod Solidago odora Asteraceae Rose-rush Lygodesmia aphylla Asteraceae Florida Green-eyes Berlandiera subacaulis Asteraceae Firewheel Gaillardia pulchella Asteraceae Shortleaf gayfeather Liatris tenuifolia Asteraceae Coastal-plain palafox Palafoxia integrifolia Asteraceae Ironweed Vernonia angustifolia Asteraceae Starry rosinweed Silphium asteriscus Asteraceae Lanceleaf tickseed Coreopsis lanceolata Asteraceae Rayless sunflower Helianthus radula Asteraceae Pricklypear Opuntia humifusa Cactaceae Gopher apple Geobalanus oblongifolius Chrysobalanaceae Pinebarren frostweed Crocanthemum corymbosum Cistaceae Atlantic St. Johns-wort Hypericum tenuifolium Clusiaceae Coastalplain dawnflower Stylisma patens Convolvulaceae Rushfoil Croton michauxii Euphorbiaceae Partridge pea Chamaecrista fasciculata Fabaceae Coralbean Erythrina herbacea Fabaceae Bastard false indigo Amorpha fruticosa Fabaceae Florida alicia Chapmannia floridana Fabaceae Buckroot Pediomelum canescens Fabaceae
    [Show full text]
  • Poaceae: Pooideae) Based on Plastid and Nuclear DNA Sequences
    d i v e r s i t y , p h y l o g e n y , a n d e v o l u t i o n i n t h e monocotyledons e d i t e d b y s e b e r g , p e t e r s e n , b a r f o d & d a v i s a a r h u s u n i v e r s i t y p r e s s , d e n m a r k , 2 0 1 0 Phylogenetics of Stipeae (Poaceae: Pooideae) Based on Plastid and Nuclear DNA Sequences Konstantin Romaschenko,1 Paul M. Peterson,2 Robert J. Soreng,2 Núria Garcia-Jacas,3 and Alfonso Susanna3 1M. G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, Tereshchenkovska 2, 01601 Kiev, Ukraine 2Smithsonian Institution, Department of Botany MRC-166, National Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 37012, Washington, District of Columbia 20013-7012 USA. 3Laboratory of Molecular Systematics, Botanic Institute of Barcelona (CSIC-ICUB), Pg. del Migdia, s.n., E08038 Barcelona, Spain Author for correspondence ([email protected]) Abstract—The Stipeae tribe is a group of 400−600 grass species of worldwide distribution that are currently placed in 21 genera. The ‘needlegrasses’ are char- acterized by having single-flowered spikelets and stout, terminally-awned lem- mas. We conducted a molecular phylogenetic study of the Stipeae (including all genera except Anemanthele) using a total of 94 species (nine species were used as outgroups) based on five plastid DNA regions (trnK-5’matK, matK, trnHGUG-psbA, trnL5’-trnF, and ndhF) and a single nuclear DNA region (ITS).
    [Show full text]