Ecological Studies of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Estuary

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ecological Studies of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Estuary STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME FISH BULLETIN 133 ECOLOGICAL STUDIES OF THE SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN ESTUARY PART I Zooplankton, Zoobenthos, and Fishes of San Pablo and Suisun Bays, Zooplankton and Zoobenthos of the Delta Compiled by D. W. KELLEY 1966 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction, by D. W. Kelley 6 Description of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Estuary__D. W. Kelley 8 Climate - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 Hydrology 10 Tides - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11 Currents - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11 Salinity - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 12 Water Quality - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 14 Historical Changes 14 Future Changes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16 Zooplankton of San Pablo and Suisun Bays___Richard E. Painter 18 Methods - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 18 Collection Procedure - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 18 Channel Zooplankton 20 Acartia clausi 22 Eurytemora affinis - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 24 Clansocalanus arcuicornis - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 24 Neomysis awatschensis - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 24 Euterpina sp. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 24 Cyclops spp. 30 Diaplomus spp. 30 0 ith ona sp. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 30 Zooplankton in Shallow Waters - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 30 Major Species 34 Mysid Shrimp 35 Discussion - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 36 Species Composition - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 36 Depth - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 36 Chlorinity - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 37 Summary - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 37 Zoobenthos of San Pablo and Suisun Bays____Richard E. Painter 40 Methods - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 40 Station Location - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 40 Sampling Procedure - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 40 Laboratory Procedure - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 41 Chlorinity - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 41 Sediments - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 44 Results - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 44 Tapes semidecussata - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 45 ( 3 ) TABLE OF CONTENTS—Continued Page Gemma gemma - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 47 Macoma inconspicua - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 47 Mya arenaria - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 48 Photis calif ornica - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 49 Corophium spp. 49 Synidotea laticauda - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 50 Neanthes succinea - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 50 Glycinde armig era - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 51 Streblospio benedicti - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 51 Polydora uncata - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 52 Discussion - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 53 Substrate—Depth - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 53 Chlorinity - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 54 Limitations - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 54 Summary - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 55 Fishes Collected in Carquinez Strait in 1961-1962 James Messersmith 57 Methods - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 57 Results - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 57 Discussion - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 62 Fishes and Decapods of the San Pablo and Suisun Bays David Ganssle 64 Methods 64 Results 66 Invertebrates - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 67 Opossum Shrimp, Neomysis awatschensis - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 67 Bay Shrimp, Crago - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 68 Fishes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 69 White Sturgeon, Acipenser transmontanus - - - - - - - - - - - - - 70 American Shad, Alosa sapidissima - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 71 Pacific Herring, Clu pea pallasi - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 72 Threadfin Shad, Dorosoma petenense - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 73 Northern Anchovy, Engraulis mordax - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 74 King Salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 75 Steelhead Rainbow Trout, Salmo gairdneri - - - - - - - - - - - - - 76 Sacramento Smelt, Spirinchus thaleichthys - - - - - - - - - - - - - 76 White Catfish, Ictalurus catus - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 78 Striped Bass, Roccus saxatilis - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 78 Staghorn Sculpin, Leptocottus armatus - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 86 Starry Flounder, Platichthys stellatus - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 87 ( 4 ) TABLE OF CONTENTS—Continued Page Discussion 88 Summary - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 91 Seasonal Distribution of Crustacean Plankters in the Sacramento- San Joaquin Delta - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Jerry L. Turner 95 Introduction - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 95 Field Methods - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 95 Laboratory Methods - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 96 Distribution and Relative Abundance - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 96 Seasonal Differences - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 96 Effect of Water Quality - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 97 Effect of Rate of Flow - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 99 Dead-End Sloughs 100 Discussion - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 101 Summary - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 103 Distribution and Concentration of Neomysis awatschensis in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Jerry L. Turner and William Heubach 105 Methods - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 105 Geographical Distribution and Concentration - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 106 Salinity - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 107 Rate of Water Flow - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 107 Depth - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 108 Oxygen - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 109 Reproduction - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 109 Discussion - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 110 Zoobenthos of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Charles R. Hazel and D. W. Kelley 113 Methods - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 113 Results - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 115 Corophium 116 OligochEeta 126 TendipedidEe 126 Corbicula fluminea 126 Sycamore Slough - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 126 Discussion - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 129 Summary - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 132 ( 5 ) INTRODUCTION The Delta Fish and Wildlife Protection Study was organized in 1961 to investigate the effects of future water development on fish and wildlife resources dependent upon the Sacramento-San Joaquin River estuary, and to recommend measures to protect and enhance these re- sources. The investigations described in this bulletin were designed to answer a number of specific questions relevant to water development plans and also to start us toward an understanding of the estuary 's ecology. The bulletin describes the results of about 2 years of collecting and 1 year of analysis on zooplankton, zoobenthos, and fishes of the middle or bay portion of this estuary and on zooplankton and zoo- benthos of the upper portion that is known as the Delta. With one exception, all papers are authored by the individuals who were responsible for the work almost from its inception in 1962. "Fishes Collected in the Carquinez Strait in 1961-1962," is the by-product of a study whose
Recommended publications
  • Winter Populations, Behavior, and Seasonal Dispersal of Bald Eagles in Northwestern Illinois
    WINTER POPULATIONS, BEHAVIOR, AND SEASONAL DISPERSAL OF BALD EAGLES IN NORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS WILLIAM E. SOUTHERN s a result of efforts by Bent (1937)) Broley (1952)) Herrick (1924, A 1932, and 1933), Imler (1955)) and others, numerous data on the Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus Zeucocephalus) are available. Little of the published information, however, pertains to the winter habits of the species or to winter population dynamics and seasonal movements. Between 27 November 1961 and 1 April 1962, at the Savanna Army Depot, Carroll and Jo Daviess counties, Illinois, my assistants and I spent 232 hours observing and attempting to trap eagles. Additional time was devoted to other aspects of the project (making and setting traps, securing bait, etc.). On several occasions we spent the entire daylight period in the area. The study area extended for 14 miles along the Mississippi River and its backwaters and sloughs, which were proliferated with islands (Fig. 1). Most of the slightly rolling terrain bordering the river was covered by deciduous forest. The trees along a portion of the main channel had been thinned to the point that the area (between points 1 and 2, Fig. 1) resembled a park. The study area represented only a small part of the habitat suitable for eagles near Savanna; however, it probably had the greatest abundance of food and, there- fore, eagles (we observed only four outside the Depot; three of these during spring dispersal). The concentrations reported during our study were larger than those reported elsewhere in the state. My objectives were to record behavior, live-trap, color-mark, and determine the movements of Bald Eagles during the winter and early spring.
    [Show full text]
  • California Saltwater Sport Fishing Regulations
    2017–2018 CALIFORNIA SALTWATER SPORT FISHING REGULATIONS For Ocean Sport Fishing in California Effective March 1, 2017 through February 28, 2018 13 2017–2018 CALIFORNIA SALTWATER SPORT FISHING REGULATIONS Groundfish Regulation Tables Contents What’s New for 2017? ............................................................. 4 24 License Information ................................................................ 5 Sport Fishing License Fees ..................................................... 8 Keeping Up With In-Season Groundfish Regulation Changes .... 11 Map of Groundfish Management Areas ...................................12 Summaries of Recreational Groundfish Regulations ..................13 General Provisions and Definitions ......................................... 20 General Ocean Fishing Regulations ��������������������������������������� 24 Fin Fish — General ................................................................ 24 General Ocean Fishing Fin Fish — Minimum Size Limits, Bag and Possession Limits, and Seasons ......................................................... 24 Fin Fish—Gear Restrictions ................................................... 33 Invertebrates ........................................................................ 34 34 Mollusks ............................................................................34 Crustaceans .......................................................................36 Non-commercial Use of Marine Plants .................................... 38 Marine Protected Areas and Other
    [Show full text]
  • KLMN Featured Creature Sculpins
    National Park Service Featured Creature U.S. Department of the Interior February 2021 Klamath Network Inventory & Monitoring Division Natural Resources Stewardship & Science Sculpins Cottidae General Description Habitat and Distribution Darting low through tide pools or lurking Sculpins occur in both marine and freshwater in stream bottoms, members of the large habitats of North America, Europe, and Asia, fish family, Cottidae, are commonly called with just a few marine species in the southern USFWS/ROGER TABOR sculpins. They also go by “bullhead” or “sea hemisphere. Most abundant in the North Prickly sculpin (Cottus asper) scorpion,” and even some very unflattering Pacific, they tend to frequent shallow water terms, like “double uglies.” You’re not likely and tide pools. In North American coldwa- to catch one on your fishing line, but if you ter streams, they overlap the same habitat as them to keep them oxygenated until they look carefully into ocean tide pools, you trout and salmon, including small headwater hatch a few weeks later into baby fish, known may spot these well camouflaged creatures streams, lakes, and rocky areas of lowland as fry. The fry will be sexually mature in time moving around the bottom. Most of the more rivers. Freshwater sculpin are sometimes the for the next breeding season. than 250–300 known species in this family are only abundant fish species in streams. Inland marine, though some live in freshwater. species found in Pacific Northwest streams Fun Facts include the riffle sculpin (Cottus gulosus), • Some sculpins are able to compress their Generally, sculpins are bottom-dwelling prickly sculpin (Cottus asper), and coastrange skull bones to fit inside small spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Saccular Otolith Mass Asymmetry in Adult Flatfishes 2581
    Journal of Fish Biology (2008) 72, 2579–2594 doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.01869.x, available online at http://www.blackwell-synergy.com Saccular otolith mass asymmetry in adult flatfishes D. V. LYCHAKOV*†,Y.T.REBANE‡, A. LOMBARTE§, M. DEMESTRE§ AND L. A. FUIMANk *Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry of Russian Academy of Sciences, St Petersburg, Thorez pr., 44, 194223, Russia, ‡Ioffe Physical Technical Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, Politekhnicheskaya 26, St Petersburg 194021, Russia, §Departament de Recursos Marins Renovables, Institut de Cie`ncies del Mar-CMIMA (CSIC), Passeig Marıtim´ 37-49, 08003 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain and kDepartment of Marine Science, University of Texas at Austin, Marine Science Institute, 750 Channel View Drive, Port Aransas, TX 78373-1267, U.S.A. (Received 29 June 2007, Accepted 20 February 2008) A dimensionless measure of otolith mass asymmetry, w, was calculated as the difference between the masses of the right and left paired otoliths divided by average otolith mass. Saccular otolith mass asymmetry was studied in eight flatfish species (110 otolith pairs) and compared with data from a previously published study on roundfishes. As in the case of symmetrical fishes, the absolute value of w in flatfishes does not depend on fish length and otolith growth rate, although otolith mass and the absolute value of otolith mass difference are correlated with fish length. The values of w were between À0Á2 and þ0Á2in96Á4% of flatfishes studied. The mean Æ S.E. value of w in flatfishes was significantly larger than in standard bilaterally symmetrical marine fishes (‘roundfishes’), respectively 0Á070 Æ 0Á006 and 0Á040 Æ 0Á006.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Bulletin No. 109. the Barred Surfperch (Amphistichus Argenteus Agassiz) in Southern California
    UC San Diego Fish Bulletin Title Fish Bulletin No. 109. The Barred Surfperch (Amphistichus argenteus Agassiz) in Southern California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9fh0623k Authors Carlisle, John G, Jr. Schott, Jack W Abramson, Norman J Publication Date 1960 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME MARINE RESOURCES OPERATIONS FISH BULLETIN No. 109 The Barred Surfperch (Amphistichus argenteus Agassiz) in Southern Califor- nia By JOHN G. CARLISLE, JR., JACK W. SCHOTT and NORMAN J. ABRAMSON 1960 1 2 3 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Surf Fishing Investigation received a great deal of help in the conduct of its field work. The arduous task of beach seining all year around was shared by many members of the California State Fisheries Laboratory staff; we are particularly grateful to Mr. Parke H. Young and Mr. John L. Baxter for their willing and continued help throughout the years. Mr. Frederick B. Hagerman was project leader for the first year of the investigation, until his recall into the Air Force, and he gave the project an excellent start. Many others gave help and advice, notably Mr. John E. Fitch, Mr. Phil M. Roedel, Mr. David C. Joseph, and Dr. F. N. Clark of this laboratory. Dr. Carl L. Hubbs of Scripps Institution of Oceanography at La Jolla gave valuable advice, and we are indebted to the late Mr. Conrad Limbaugh of the same institution for accounts of his observations on surf fishes, and for SCUBA diving instructions. The project was fortunate in securing able seasonal help, particularly from Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Shad in the Schools, NC
    Attachment 1 Food Web Activity Student Sheet Background Information: Shad in the Schools, N.C. The coastal rivers and shallow marine environments along the coast of North Carolina are home to complex ecosystems. Within these freshwater and saltwater ecosystems there is an intimate relationship between many different producers and consumers. These produces and consumers create an interconnected food web. Each organism is dependent on clean water, oxygen, and healthy riparian corridors on the lands adjacent to these waters. The disruption of just one component of any food web can disturb all living things, including humans. American shad, a member of the herring family, is one species of fish that plays a critical role in the river and near shore shallow marine ecosystems of North Carolina. Shad are an anadromous species, meaning they live in the ocean but return to the rivers of North Carolina in the spring to spawn, or reproduce, each spring. This means that shad serve as a food source for many animals living in both inland freshwater and marine environments. Predators of shad include other fishes such as striped bass and king mackerel, bald eagles, bottlenose dolphin, and humans. Bald eagles have evolved to raise their young at the same time that anadromous fishes, such as shad, return to the rivers to spawn so that the young eaglets will have a plentiful food source. This evolutionary trait highlights the connectivity that can be found within food webs. Bald Eagles can be viewed now through a new technology, web cams. To see eagles that feed on herring near North Carolina, view http://www.friendsofblackwater.org/camhtm2.html.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017
    Washington Natural Heritage Program List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017 The following list of animals known from Washington is complete for resident and transient vertebrates and several groups of invertebrates, including odonates, branchipods, tiger beetles, butterflies, gastropods, freshwater bivalves and bumble bees. Some species from other groups are included, especially where there are conservation concerns. Among these are the Palouse giant earthworm, a few moths and some of our mayflies and grasshoppers. Currently 857 vertebrate and 1,100 invertebrate taxa are included. Conservation status, in the form of range-wide, national and state ranks are assigned to each taxon. Information on species range and distribution, number of individuals, population trends and threats is collected into a ranking form, analyzed, and used to assign ranks. Ranks are updated periodically, as new information is collected. We welcome new information for any species on our list. Common Name Scientific Name Class Global Rank State Rank State Status Federal Status Northwestern Salamander Ambystoma gracile Amphibia G5 S5 Long-toed Salamander Ambystoma macrodactylum Amphibia G5 S5 Tiger Salamander Ambystoma tigrinum Amphibia G5 S3 Ensatina Ensatina eschscholtzii Amphibia G5 S5 Dunn's Salamander Plethodon dunni Amphibia G4 S3 C Larch Mountain Salamander Plethodon larselli Amphibia G3 S3 S Van Dyke's Salamander Plethodon vandykei Amphibia G3 S3 C Western Red-backed Salamander Plethodon vehiculum Amphibia G5 S5 Rough-skinned Newt Taricha granulosa
    [Show full text]
  • Vii Fishery-At-A-Glance Night Smelt Scientific Name: Spirinchus Starksi Range
    Fishery-at-a-Glance Night Smelt Scientific Name: Spirinchus starksi Range: Night Smelt are distributed coast-wide from southeast Alaska to Point Arguello, Santa Barbara County. Habitat: Night Smelt occur in the surf and in depths from the surface to approximately 400 feet (122 meters). Size (length and weight): Night Smelt measure less than 6 inches total length (140 millimeters) weighing to 11 grams. Males are slightly longer and heavier than females. Life span: Night Smelt are short lived and believed to reach a maximum of 2 to 3 years. Reproduction: Spawning occurs in the surf along open coast coarse sand beaches from January to September. Eggs are fertilized in the wash of the surf, adhere to sand grains, and sink. Hatching occurs in approximately 2 weeks. Prey: Night Smelt feed on small crustaceans—primarily gammarid amphipods and mysid shrimp. Predators: Night Smelt provide forage for a wide range of predators, including Striped Bass, Redtail Surfperch, salmon, Harbor Seals, California Sea Lions, terns, gulls, and cormorants. Fishery: Commercial and recreational fisheries are shore-based. Area fished: Historically, fishing occurred from Moss Landing, Monterey County to the Oregon border. Currently, fishing occurs from San Mateo County to Del Norte County. Fishing season: Fishing occurs during the spawning season—January to September. Fishing gear: Fishermen fish from shore using A-frame dip nets. Market(s): Landed fish are sold for human consumption and aquarium food. Current stock status: No formal stock assessments exist for Night Smelt. Although catch rates have increased on average since the early 2000s, it is undetermined if this increase in the index is due to increased abundance or changes in fishermen behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Hypomesus Nipponensis) Stock Trajectory in Lake Kasumigaura and Kitaura
    Open Journal of Marine Science, 2015, 5, 210-225 Published Online April 2015 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojms http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojms.2015.52017 Factors Affecting Japanese Pond Smelt (Hypomesus nipponensis) Stock Trajectory in Lake Kasumigaura and Kitaura Ashneel Ajay Singh1, Noriyuki Sunoh2, Shintaro Niwa2, Fumitaka Tokoro2, Daisuke Sakamoto1, Naoki Suzuki1, Kazumi Sakuramoto1* 1Department of Ocean Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Tokyo, Japan 2Freshwater Branch Office, Ibaraki Fisheries Research Institute, Ibaraki, Japan Email: *[email protected] Received 5 February 2015; accepted 26 March 2015; published 30 March 2015 Copyright © 2015 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract The Japanese pond smelt (Hypomesus nipponensis) stock has been observed to fluctuate quite ri- gorously over the years with sustained periods of low catch in Lake Kasumigaura and Kitaura of the Ibaraki prefecture, Japan which would adversely affect the socioeconomic livelihood of the lo- cal fishermen and fisheries industry. This study was aimed at determining the factors affecting the stock fluctuation of the pond smelt through the different years in the two lakes. Through explora- tory analysis it was found that the pond smelt had significant relationship with total phosphorus (TP) level in both lakes. The global mean land and ocean temperature index (LOTI) was also found to be indirectly related to the pond smelt stock in lake Kasumigaura and Kitaura at the latitude band of 24˚N to 90˚N (l).
    [Show full text]
  • March, 1969 Idly, All Through the 1970'S Assuming Relatively Full Employment Nationally and the Continuing High Level of Economic Activity Needed to Achieve This Goal
    n rtn· 70's "Serving the men who move the earth!" * * * ENGINEERS NEWS Apprentice Method .....SHED TO ••OMOll , •• GENERAL WELfARE OF ... ENGINEERS ~N. THEIR FAMILIES Still Key To Entry By· AL CLEM International Vice President · Business Manager and Editor Employment of operating engineers is expected to increase rap­ Vol. 28-No. 3 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA March, 1969 idly, all through the 1970's assuming relatively full employment nationally and the continuing high level of economic activity needed to achieve this goal. An estimated 250,000 were employed as excavating, grading and road machinery operators in early 1967, and many thousands more of these operating engineers.held jobs as operators of other types of construction machinery such as cranes, derricks, hoists, diesel engines, air-compressors, trenchpipe layers and dredges. Thousands of additional oppor­ tunities will come in the years just as the best way to qualify for ·immediately ahead because of the journeymen status as an operating anticipated growth in consb·uction engineer. Many men with mechan­ ical aptitude do enter this occupa­ $ activity, and the growing volume of highway work along with main­ tion by obtaining jobs as oilers tenance and ·repair will be espe­ (operating engineers' assistant) or cially important in the develop­ as helpers to heavy equipment re­ ment of employment. pairmen. Workers on these jobs The trend toward the increasing gain a knowledge of the ma­ use of construction machinery chinery, how to keep it · in good shows every indication of continu­ running order and how to make ing. repairs. Oilers and helpers must We must also take into account perform their work well and dern­ technological development.
    [Show full text]
  • San Joaquin River Riparian Habitat Below Friant Dam: Preservation and Restoration1
    SAN JOAQUIN RIVER RIPARIAN HABITAT BELOW FRIANT DAM: PRESERVATION AND RESTORATION1 Donn Furman2 Abstract: Riparian habitat along California's San Joa- quin River in the 25 miles between Friant Darn and Free- Table 1 – Riparian wildlife/vegetation way 99 occurs on approximately 6 percent of its his- corridor toric range. It is threatened directly and indirectly by Corridor Corridor increased urban encroachment such as residential hous- Category Acres Percent ing, certain recreational uses, sand and gravel extraction, Water 1,088 14.0 aquiculture, and road construction. The San Joaquin Trees 588 7.0 River Committee was formed in 1985 to advocate preser- Shrubs 400 5.0 Other riparianl 1,844 23.0 vation and restoration of riparian habitat. The Com- Sensitive Biotic2 101 1.5 mittee works with local school districts to facilitate use Agriculture 148 2.0 of riverbottom riparian forest areas for outdoor envi- Recreation 309 4.0 ronmental education. We recently formed a land trust Sand and gravel 606 7.5 called the San Joaquin River Parkway and Conservation Riparian buffer 2,846 36.0 Trust to preserve land through acquisition in fee and ne- Total 7,900 100.0 gotiation of conservation easements. Opportunities for 1 Land supporting riparian-type vegetation. In increasing riverbottom riparian habitat are presented by most cases this land has been mined for sand and gravel, and is comprised of lands from which sand and gravel have been extracted. gravel ponds. 2 Range of a Threatened or Endangered plant or animal species. Study Area The majority of the undisturbed riparian habitat lies between Friant Dam and Highway 41 beyond the city limits of Fresno.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    INTRODUCTION The purpose of this book is twofold: to provide general information for anyone interested in the California islands and to serve as a field guide for visitors to the islands. The book covers both general history and nat- ural history, from the geological origins of the islands through their aboriginal inhabitants and their marine and terrestrial biotas. Detailed coverage of the flora and fauna of one island alone would completely fill a book of this size; hence only the most common, most readily observed, and most interesting species are included. The names used for the plants and animals discussed in this book are the most up-to-date ones available, based on the scientific literature and the most recently published guidebooks. Common names are always subject to local variations, and they change constantly. Where two names are in common use, they are both mentioned the first time the organism is discussed. Ironically, in recent years scientific names have changed more recently than common names, and the reader concerned about a possible discrepancy in nomenclature should consult the scientific literature. If a significant nomenclatural change has escaped our notice, we apologize. For plants, our primary reference has been The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California, edited by James C. Hickman, including the latest lists of errata. Variation from the nomenclature in that volume is due to more recent interpretations, as explained in the text. Certain abbreviations used throughout the text may not be immedi- ately familiar to the general reader; they are as follows: sp., species (sin- gular); spp., species (plural); n.
    [Show full text]