Megaesophagus in congenital diaphragmatic

M. Prakash, Z. Ninan1, V. Avirat1, N. Madhavan1, J. S. Mohammed1 Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, and 1Department of Paediatric , Royal Hospital, Muscat, Oman

For correspondence: Dr. P. Manikoth, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Royal Hospital, Muscat, Oman. E-mail: [email protected]

ABSTRACT A newborn with megaesophagus associated with a left sided congenital is reported. This is an under recognized condition associated with herniation of the into the chest and results in chronic morbidity with impairment of growth due to severe gastro esophageal reflux and feed intolerance. The infant was treated successfully by repair of the diaphragmatic hernia and subsequently Case Report Case Report Case Report Case Report Case Report by fundoplication. The megaesophagus associated with diaphragmatic hernia may not require surgical correction in the absence of severe symptoms.

Key words: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia, megaesophagus

How to cite this article: Prakash M, Ninan Z, Avirat V, Madhavan N, Mohammed JS. Megaesophagus in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Indian J Surg 2005;67:327-9.

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) com- neonate immediately intubated and ventilated. His monly occurs through the posterolateral de- vital signs improved dramatically with positive pres- fect of Bochdalek and left sided are sure ventilation and he received antibiotics, sedation, more common than right. The incidence and muscle paralysis and inotropes to stabilize his gener- variety of associated malformations are high- al condition. A plain radiograph of the chest and ab- ly variable and may be related to the side of domen revealed a left sided diaphragmatic hernia herniation. The association of CDH with meg- with the stomach and intestines located in the left aesophagus has been described earlier and hemithorax (Figure 1). Echocardiogram revealed a clinical symptoms managed without surgery dextroposed with persistent foramen ovale, in- but with compromised growth. We describe a teratrial septum bulging into left atrium, hypoplastic newborn with left sided CDH and megaesopha- left pulmonary and mild tricuspid regurgita- gus who required early surgical correction due tion. to severe gastro esophageal reflux (GER) and feed intolerance. He underwent diaphragmatic repair on the fourth day of life via a left subcostal incision. During surgery a CASE HISTORY large posterolateral defect was noted, with herniation of stomach, spleen and small and large intestines into A male baby weighing 2400 g, born by spon- the thoracic cavity. The left lung was small and hypo- taneous vaginal delivery at 36 weeks gesta- plastic. After reduction of the viscera the diaphrag- tion to a primigravida mother was found to matic defect was repaired. The infant was extubated be cyanosed with severe respiratory distress on the eighth day of life but remained tachypnoeic and at birth. The antenatal period was unevent- was given total . The nasogastric ful and a second trimester antenatal scan was aspirate was initially greenish with large volumes and reported as normal. A clinical diagnosis of left associated with occasional vomiting. Gradually it be- sided diaphragmatic hernia was made and the came less and nonbilious and he was started on small volume of milk feeds (1 ml/h). He passed normal stools and did not have any abdominal distension. However Paper Received: March, 2005. Paper Accepted: May, 2005. he did not tolerate any further increase in feed even Source of Support: Nil. after 2 weeks of starting nasogastric feed.

Indian J Surg | December 2005 | Volume 67 | Issue 6 327 CMYK327 Prakash, et al.

An upper gastrointestinal contrast study done at this rection of malrotation and release of all adhesions were time showed a dilated lower with massive done. The infant was extubated on the following day reflux and a sub diaphragmatic stomach with delayed and nasogastric feed started a day later with progres- emptying (Figure 2). Although malrotation was noted sive and rapid increase to reach full feed. He was dis- there was no evidence of distal obstruction. A laparot- charged at 1 month of age on exclusive breastfeeds omy was done on the 22nd day of life, which showed and gaining weight. On review after 6 weeks the in- a megaesophagus without hiatus hernia. The diaphrag- fant had gained 1000 g in weight and continues to matic repair was intact and extensive adhesions and thrive well at 6 months of age. malrotation were noted. Nissen fundoplication, cor- DISCUSSION

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia occurs due to failure of the pleuroperitoneal membrane to develop adequate- ly and close around the eighth week of gestation. The abdominal viscera then enter the pleural cavity and cause poor lung development leading to pulmonary hypoplasia. Over 90% involve a posterolateral defect and occur on the left side.[1] High risk factors for mor- bidity and mortality in CDH include antenatal diagno- sis, early onset of symptoms after birth, prematurity and any associated anomalies. The mortality of CDH is directly related to the degree of lung hypoplasia and pulmonary hypertension. Besides chromosomal anom- alies, malformations associated with CDH may involve cardiovascular, neurological, skeletal, genitourinary and gastrointestinal systems. Gastrointestinal anoma- lies known to occur include pyloric , malrota- tion of gut, , imperforate , Meck- el’s diverticulum and Hirschsprung’s disease.[2]

Most cases of CDH are detected by antental ultrasonog- raphy and most neonates present with severe respira- Figure 1: A plain radiograph of the chest and abdomen on day 1 tory distress within the first few hours of life. A plain of life reveals left sided diaphragmatic hernia with stomach and intestines located in the left hemithorax radiograph of the chest is helpful in the initial evalua- tion of the type of defect and its contents. A nonaerat- ed CDH can appear as a solid mass and an aerated her- nia needs to be differentiated from other congenital cystic lung lesions. In a left sided CDH the presence of the tip of the nasogastric tube in the left hemithorax or at the level of the esophago gastric junction are in- dicative of gastric herniation.

Feed intolerance is commonly observed after CDH re- pair and besides postoperative sedation, paralysis and , the associated gastrointestinal anomalies often add to its causation. Esophageal dilatation causing GER is increasingly recognized as a cause of both acute and chronic morbidity in infants surviving CDH repair. The association of CDH with megaesophagus has been de- scribed earlier[3,4] and clinical symptoms managed with- out surgery but with compromised growth. There are many factors, which contribute to the esophageal dil- atation.[5] The mediastinal shift and compression as- sociated with CDH may disturb the normal develop- ment and mobility of the intrathoracic oesophagus, leading to chronic ectasia and impairment of lower Figure 2: Upper gastro intestinal contrast study on day 21 of life esophageal sphincter function. The relative esopha- showing megaesophagus with a sub diaphragmatic stomach geal obstruction due to kinking at the gastro esopha-

328 Indian J Surg | December 2005 | Volume 67 | Issue 6 328 CMYK Megaoesophagus in congenital diaphragmatic hernia geal junction may lead to in utero and of acute and chronic morbidity in infants surviving contribute to development of esophageal dilatation. repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. An early Abnormality of the gastro esophageal junction, a short- gastrointestinal contrast study is indicated in presence ened intra-abdominal esophagus and an obtuse angle of persistent feed intolerance postoperatively. If left of His are other postulated reasons. The increased in- untreated it results in significant and long-term im- tra-abdominal pressure after repair and deformed crus pairment of growth and development of these infants. due to tight repair of the hemidiaphragm are other The megaesophagus associated with diaphragmatic contributory causes. In a left sided CDH with intratho- hernia may not require immediate surgical correction racic stomach these factors result in esophageal dila- in the absence of severe symptoms. tation in utero and produce GER and feed intolerance after surgical repair. Since primary repair of a large REFERENCES defect without a prosthesis has been thought to be one of the reasons for an obstructive mechanism at the 1. Skandalakis JE, Gray SW, Ricketts RR. The diaphragm. In: gastro esophageal junction, some centres routinely use Skandalakis JE, Gray SW, editors. Embryology for Surgeons. them for repair of for very large defects.[6] We chose Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore; 1994. 2. Losty PD, Vanamo K, Rintala RJ, Donahoe PK, Schnitzer JJ, not to use the above as our preference was for anatom- Lloyd DA. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia-does the side of ical closure. The use of prosthesis during repair has the defect influence the incidence of associated malformations? not been conclusively shown to prevent GER.[7] J Pediatr Surg 1998;33:507-10. 3. Stolar CJH, Levy JP, Dillon PW, Reyes C, Belamarich P, Berdon The preoperative fluoroscopic examination did not WE. Anatomic and functional abnormalities of the esophagus in infants surviving congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Am J show evidence of distal obstruction. Hence we believe Surg 1990;159:204-7. that the feed intolerance was due to severe GER, rath- 4. Karnak I, Senocak ME, Tanyel FC, Buyukpamukcu N. er than malrotation, which is an associated finding in Abnormal esophageal anatomy associated with a congenital CDH. The megaesophagus in CDH may resolve spon- diaphragmatic hernia: report of a case. Surg Today taneously with conservative management.[3,8] Fundop- 2001;31:1005-7. lication was required for the above infant in the neo- 5. Reickert CA, Hirschl RB. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia. In: Stringer MD, Oldham KT, Mouriquand PDE, Howard ER, natal period itself, due to severe GER and inability to editors. and Urology: Long term outcomes. continue enteral feeding even after 2 weeks of CDH London: W.B.Saunders; 1998. pp134-5. repair. We did not attempt a trial of prolonged nasodu- 6. Fasching G, Huber A, Uray E, Sorantin E, Lindbichler F, Mayr odenal or nasojejunal feeding due to the severity of J. Gastroesophageal reflux and diaphragmatic motility after symptoms. A recent review looking at nutritional mor- repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2000;10:360-4. bidity in survivors of CDH suggests antireflux fundop- 7. Kieffer J, Sapin E, Berg A, Beaudoin S, Bargy F, Helardot PG. lication operation for pathologic GER.[9] The subse- Gastroesophageal reflux after repair of congenital quent relief of symptoms with rapid increase to reach diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg 1995;30:1330-3. full oral feed and the remarkable weight gain observed 8. Makhoul IR, Shoshany G, Smolkin T, Epelman M, Sujov P. during follow-up justified the necessity for an early Transient mega-oesophagus in a neonate with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Eur Radiol 2001;11:867-9. antireflux surgery, rarely done at this age. 9. Muratore CS, Utter S, Jaksic T, Lund DP, Wilson JM. Nutritional morbidity in survivors of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J To conclude esophageal dilatation with GER is a cause Pediatr Surg 2001;36:1171-6.

Indian J Surg | December 2005 | Volume 67 | Issue 6 329 CMYK329