DOCSLIB.ORG

Nova Scotia Atlee Perinatal Database Coding Manual 15 Edition (Version

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nova Scotia Atlee Perinatal Database Coding Manual 15 Edition (Version Nova Scotia Atlee Perinatal Database Coding Manual 15th Edition (Version 15.0.0) April 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS LISTINGS OF HOSPITALS 11 ADMISSION INFORMATION 16 DELIVERED ADMISSION 26 Routine Information – Delivered Admission 26 Routine Information – Labour 57 Routine Information – Infant 77 UNDELIVERED ADMISSION 94 Routine information – undelivered 94 POSTPARTUM ADMISSIONS 104 Routine Information – Postpartum Admission 104 NEONATAL ADMISSIONS 112 Routine Information – Neonatal Admissions 112 ADULT RCP CODES 124 INFANT RCP CODES 143 INDEX OF MATERNAL DISEASES AND PROCEDURES 179 INDEX OF NEONATAL DISEASES AND PROCEDURES 195 1 INDEX FOR ADMISSION INFORMATION Admission date .............................................................................................................................. 17 Admission time .............................................................................................................................. 17 Admission process status ............................................................................................................... 25 Admission type .............................................................................................................................. 17 A/S/D number ................................................................................................................................ 18 Birth date ....................................................................................................................................... 18 Care provider attending ................................................................................................................. 22 City/town ...................................................................................................................................... 23 Contact hospital ............................................................................................................................ 16 Discharge date ............................................................................................................................... 16 Discharge time .............................................................................................................................. 16 Given name(s) ............................................................................................................................... 17 Health card number ....................................................................................................................... 18 Mail address .................................................................................................................................. 23 Marital status .................................................................................................................................. 22 Municipal code for residence ........................................................................................................ 19 Postal code .................................................................................................................................... 23 Previous surname .......................................................................................................................... 17 Province ........................................................................................................................................ 24 Sex ................................................................................................................................................ 22 Street address ................................................................................................................................ 23 Surname ........................................................................................................................................ 17 Unit number .................................................................................................................................. 16 2 INDEX FOR ROUTINE INFORMATION – DELIVERED ADMISSION Abdominal circumference measurements ..................................................................................... 44 Abdominal circumference gestational age .................................................................................... 46 Abortions ...................................................................................................................................... 29 Admitted from ............................................................................................................................... 27 Analgesia during labour ................................................................................................................ 52 Antibiotic therapy ......................................................................................................................... 53 Antibiotic date ............................................................................................................................... 55 Antibiotic time .............................................................................................................................. 56 Attendance at prenatal classes ....................................................................................................... 39 Autopsy (maternal) ....................................................................................................................... 50 Biparietal diameter measurement .................................................................................................. 44 Biparietal diameter gestational age ............................................................................................... 46 Crown/rump length measurements ............................................................................................... 43 Crown/rump length gestational age .............................................................................................. 45 Date of first ultrasound ................................................................................................................. 42 Date of last normal menstrual period ............................................................................................ 28 Delivery hospital ........................................................................................................................... 26 Education ...................................................................................................................................... 36 Femur length measurement ............................................................................................................ 45 Femur length gestational age ......................................................................................................... 47 Fetus number .................................................................................................................................. 42 Fetal Surveillance Methods ............................................................................................................ 68 Gravida .......................................................................................................................................... 28 Head circumference measurements .............................................................................................. 44 Head circumference gestational age ............................................................................................. 46 Intent to breast feed ....................................................................................................................... 37 Initial breast contact ...................................................................................................................... 68 Maternal height ............................................................................................................................. 38 Maternal screening test(s) ............................................................................................................. 48 Maternal ultrasound ...................................................................................................................... 42 Maternal steroid therapy ................................................................................................................ 51 Maternal primary cause of death ................................................................................................... 50 3 INDEX FOR ROUTINE INFORMATION – DELIVERED ADMISSION Number of fetuses ......................................................................................................................... 41 Number of abortions ..................................................................................................................... 29 Number of previous C-sections...................................................................................................... 31 Number of previous fetal deaths .................................................................................................... 30 Number of previous low birth weight infants ................................................................................ 32 Number of previous neonatal deaths ............................................................................................. 30 Number of previous pre-term deliveries ....................................................................................... 31 Number of previous postpartum hemorrhage ..............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PGD: a Celebration of 20 Years
    PGD: A Celebration of 20 years: What is Reality and What is Not? Roma June 30, 2010 Mark Hughes, M.D., Ph.D . Professor of Genetics, Internal Medicine, Pathology Director, Genesis Genetics Institute Director, State of Michigan Genomic Technology Center Reality – (Three obvious ones) PGD • Has led to the birth of thousands of healthy children to very desperate, genetically at-risk couples. • Remains at the very limit of medical diagnostic testing • The technology continues to improve - – but it is not reality to think PGD will ever have a 0% false positive or false negative rate Reality: We still do not know What is best to biopsy, and when? Polar Body Blastomere Trophoectoderm Variation in Biopsy Skill Clinic Biopsies +HCG / ET 1 314 17% 2 427 26% 3 181 12% 4 712 31% Reality: We all are controversial • PGD has raised international controversy – How is it bioethically different from Prenatal Testing? – Who should control the use of these technologies? – Should there be government PGD testing standards? • What is the difference between a Disease and a Trait - and who decides? PGD Disorders (A, B, C) • ACHONDROPLASIA (FGFR) • BARTH DILIATED CARDIOMYOPATHY • ACTIN-NEMALIN MYOPATHY (ACTA) • BETA THALASSEMIA (HBB) • ADRENOLEUKODYSTROPHY (ABCD) • BLOOM SYNDROME • AGAMMAGLOBULINEMIA-BRUTON (TYKNS) • BREAST CANCER (BRCA1 & 2) • ALAGILLE SYNDROME (JAG) • CACH-ATAXIA (EIFB) • ALDOLASE A, FRUCTOSE-BISPHOSPHATE • CADASIL (NOTCH) • ALPHA THALASSEMIA (HBA) • CANAVAN DISEASE (ASPA) • ALPHA-ANTITRYPSIN (AAT) • CARNITINE-ACYLCARN TRANSLOCASE • ALPORT SYNDROME
    [Show full text]
  • Impetigo Herpetiformis: a Case Report
    Perinatal Journal • Vol: 13, Issue: 4/December 2005 227 Impetigo Herpetiformis: A Case Report ‹ncim Bezircio¤lu1, Merve Biçer1, Levent Karc›1, Füsun Özder2, Ali Balo¤lu1 1First Clinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2Clinics of Dermatology, Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, ‹zmir Abstract Objective: Impetigo herpetiformis is a rare and potentially life-threatening pustular dermatosis affecting mainly pregnant women. We report here a case of impetigo herpetiformis which occured in twenty-ninth week of pregnancy. Case: A 32 year old gravida 2, para1 pregnant woman who was referred to our institution because of congestive heart failure, gestational diabetes mellitus and oligohidroamnios in 27th gestational age was hospitalized. Eruptive pustular lesions which appeared in 29th week of the gestation has spread her entire body. Her pustular cultures were negative. A punch skin biopsy from a pustule on the trunk made the diagnosis of impetigo herpetiformis. The patient who developed spontaneous uterine contractions was treated with betamethazone and tocolysis. The patient who did not respond to this treatment was taken to delivery at 30 weeks of gestation.The newborn showed no skin lesions after birth. The skin lesions of the mother improved in the second postpartum week. Conclusion: The rates of maternal mortality and fetal mortality and morbidity due to placental insufficiency are increased in impetigo herpetiformis. To reduce the mortality and morbidity rates the antenatal management of impetigo herpetiformis should be organized with a multidisciplinary approach. Keywords: Impetigo herpetiformis, generalized pustular psoriasis. Impetigo herpetiformis: Bir olgu sunumu Amaç: ‹mpetigo herpetiformis gebelerde görülen yaflam› riske edebilen nadir bir püstüler dermatozdur. Bu çal›flmada 29.gebe- lik haftas›nda ortaya ç›kan impetigo herpetiformis olgusu sunulmufltur.
    [Show full text]
  • Associated Palmoplantar Keratoderma
    DR ABIGAIL ZIEMAN (Orcid ID : 0000-0001-8236-207X) Article type : Review Article Pathophysiology of pachyonychia congenita-associated palmoplantar keratoderma: New insight into skin epithelial homeostasis and avenues for treatment Authors: A. G. Zieman1 and P. A. Coulombe1,2 # Affiliations: 1Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; 2Department of Dermatology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA #Corresponding author: Pierre A. Coulombe, PhD, 3071 Biomedical Sciences Research Building, 109 Zina Pitcher Place, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. Tel: 734-615-7509. Email: [email protected]. Funding Sources: These studies were supported by grant AR044232 issued to P.A.C. from the National Institute of Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Disease (NIAMS). A.G.Z. received support from grant T32 CA009110 from the National Cancer Institute. Author Manuscript This is the author manuscript accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as doi: 10.1111/BJD.18033 This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved Conflict of interest disclosures: None declared. Bulleted statements: What’s already known about this topic? Pachyonychia congenita is a rare genodermatosis caused by mutations in KRT6A, KRT6B, KRT6C, KRT16, KRT17, which are normally expressed in skin appendages and induced following injury. Individuals with PC present with multiple clinical symptoms that usually include thickened and dystrophic nails, palmoplantar keratoderma (PPK), glandular cysts, and oral leukokeratosis.
    [Show full text]
  • ICD-9 Diagnosis Codes Effective 10/1/2011 (V29.0) Source: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
    ICD-9 Diagnosis Codes effective 10/1/2011 (v29.0) Source: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 0010 Cholera d/t vib cholerae 00801 Int inf e coli entrpath 01086 Prim prg TB NEC-oth test 0011 Cholera d/t vib el tor 00802 Int inf e coli entrtoxgn 01090 Primary TB NOS-unspec 0019 Cholera NOS 00803 Int inf e coli entrnvsv 01091 Primary TB NOS-no exam 0020 Typhoid fever 00804 Int inf e coli entrhmrg 01092 Primary TB NOS-exam unkn 0021 Paratyphoid fever a 00809 Int inf e coli spcf NEC 01093 Primary TB NOS-micro dx 0022 Paratyphoid fever b 0081 Arizona enteritis 01094 Primary TB NOS-cult dx 0023 Paratyphoid fever c 0082 Aerobacter enteritis 01095 Primary TB NOS-histo dx 0029 Paratyphoid fever NOS 0083 Proteus enteritis 01096 Primary TB NOS-oth test 0030 Salmonella enteritis 00841 Staphylococc enteritis 01100 TB lung infiltr-unspec 0031 Salmonella septicemia 00842 Pseudomonas enteritis 01101 TB lung infiltr-no exam 00320 Local salmonella inf NOS 00843 Int infec campylobacter 01102 TB lung infiltr-exm unkn 00321 Salmonella meningitis 00844 Int inf yrsnia entrcltca 01103 TB lung infiltr-micro dx 00322 Salmonella pneumonia 00845 Int inf clstrdium dfcile 01104 TB lung infiltr-cult dx 00323 Salmonella arthritis 00846 Intes infec oth anerobes 01105 TB lung infiltr-histo dx 00324 Salmonella osteomyelitis 00847 Int inf oth grm neg bctr 01106 TB lung infiltr-oth test 00329 Local salmonella inf NEC 00849 Bacterial enteritis NEC 01110 TB lung nodular-unspec 0038 Salmonella infection NEC 0085 Bacterial enteritis NOS 01111 TB lung nodular-no exam 0039
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Learning in Maternal-Fetal Medicine
    GUIDE TO LEARNING IN MATERNAL-FETAL MEDICINE First in Women’s Health The Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine of The American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inc. 2915 Vine Street Dallas, TX 75204 Direct questions to: ABOG Fellowship Department 214.871.1619 (Main Line) 214.721.7526 (Fellowship Line) 214.871.1943 (Fax) [email protected] www.abog.org Revised 4/2018 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 3 II. DEFINITION OF A MATERNAL-FETAL MEDICINE SUBSPECIALIST .................................... 3 III. OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................................ 3 IV. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS ................................................................................................ 3 V. ENDOCRINOLOGY OF PREGNANCY ..................................................................................... 4 VI. PHYSIOLOGY ........................................................................................................................... 6 VII. BIOCHEMISTRY ........................................................................................................................ 9 VIII. PHARMACOLOGY .................................................................................................................... 9 IX. PATHOLOGY .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • WES Gene Package Multiple Congenital Anomalie.Xlsx
    Whole Exome Sequencing Gene package Multiple congenital anomalie, version 5, 1‐2‐2018 Technical information DNA was enriched using Agilent SureSelect Clinical Research Exome V2 capture and paired‐end sequenced on the Illumina platform (outsourced). The aim is to obtain 8.1 Giga base pairs per exome with a mapped fraction of 0.99. The average coverage of the exome is ~50x. Duplicate reads are excluded. Data are demultiplexed with bcl2fastq Conversion Software from Illumina. Reads are mapped to the genome using the BWA‐MEM algorithm (reference: http://bio‐bwa.sourceforge.net/). Variant detection is performed by the Genome Analysis Toolkit HaplotypeCaller (reference: http://www.broadinstitute.org/gatk/). The detected variants are filtered and annotated with Cartagenia software and classified with Alamut Visual. It is not excluded that pathogenic mutations are being missed using this technology. At this moment, there is not enough information about the sensitivity of this technique with respect to the detection of deletions and duplications of more than 5 nucleotides and of somatic mosaic mutations (all types of sequence changes). HGNC approved Phenotype description including OMIM phenotype ID(s) OMIM median depth % covered % covered % covered gene symbol gene ID >10x >20x >30x A4GALT [Blood group, P1Pk system, P(2) phenotype], 111400 607922 101 100 100 99 [Blood group, P1Pk system, p phenotype], 111400 NOR polyagglutination syndrome, 111400 AAAS Achalasia‐addisonianism‐alacrimia syndrome, 231550 605378 73 100 100 100 AAGAB Keratoderma, palmoplantar,
    [Show full text]
  • Code Description
    Code Description 0061 Chronic intestinal amebiasis without mention of abscess 0062 Amebic nondysenteric colitis 0063 Amebic liver abscess 0064 Amebic lung abscess 00642 West Nile fever with other neurologic manifestation 00649 West Nile fever with other complications 0065 Amebic brain abscess 0066 Amebic skin ulceration 0068 Amebic infection of other sites 0069 Amebiasis, unspecified 0070 Other protozoal intestinal diseases, balantidiasis (Infection by Balantidium coli) 0071 Other protozoal intestinal diseases, giardiasis 0072 Other protozoal intestinal diseases, coccidiosis 0073 Other protozoal intestinal diseases, trichomoniasis 0074 Other protozoal intestinal diseases, cryptosporidiosis 0075 Other protozoal intestional disease cyclosporiasis 0078 Other specified protozoal intestinal diseases 0079 Unspecified protozoal intestinal disease 01000 Primary tuberculous infection, unspecified 01001 Primary tuberculous infection bacteriological or histological examination not done 01002 Primary tuberculous infection, bacteriological or histological examination results unknown 01003 Primary tuberculous infection, tubercle bacilli found by microscopy 01004 Primary tuberculous infection, tubercle bacilli found by bacterial culture 01005 Primary tuberculous infection, tubercle bacilli confirmed histolgically 01006 Primary tuberculous infection, tubercle bacilli found by other methods 01010 Tuberculous pleurisy in primary progressive tuberculosis unspecified 01011 Tuberculous pleurisy bacteriological or histological examination not done 01012 Tuberculous
    [Show full text]
  • Megaesophagus in Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia
    Megaesophagus in congenital diaphragmatic hernia M. Prakash, Z. Ninan1, V. Avirat1, N. Madhavan1, J. S. Mohammed1 Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, and 1Department of Paediatric Surgery, Royal Hospital, Muscat, Oman For correspondence: Dr. P. Manikoth, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Royal Hospital, Muscat, Oman. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT A newborn with megaesophagus associated with a left sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia is reported. This is an under recognized condition associated with herniation of the stomach into the chest and results in chronic morbidity with impairment of growth due to severe gastro esophageal reflux and feed intolerance. The infant was treated successfully by repair of the diaphragmatic hernia and subsequently Case Report Case Report Case Report Case Report Case Report by fundoplication. The megaesophagus associated with diaphragmatic hernia may not require surgical correction in the absence of severe symptoms. Key words: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia, megaesophagus How to cite this article: Prakash M, Ninan Z, Avirat V, Madhavan N, Mohammed JS. Megaesophagus in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Indian J Surg 2005;67:327-9. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) com- neonate immediately intubated and ventilated. His monly occurs through the posterolateral de- vital signs improved dramatically with positive pres- fect of Bochdalek and left sided hernias are sure ventilation and he received antibiotics, sedation, more common than right. The incidence and muscle paralysis and inotropes to stabilize his gener- variety of associated malformations are high- al condition. A plain radiograph of the chest and ab- ly variable and may be related to the side of domen revealed a left sided diaphragmatic hernia herniation. The association of CDH with meg- with the stomach and intestines located in the left aesophagus has been described earlier and hemithorax (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Pediatric Gastroesophageal Reflux Clinical Practice
    SOCIETY PAPER Pediatric Gastroesophageal Reflux Clinical Practice Guidelines: Joint Recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition ÃRachel Rosen, yYvan Vandenplas, zMaartje Singendonk, §Michael Cabana, jjCarlo DiLorenzo, ôFrederic Gottrand, #Sandeep Gupta, ÃÃMiranda Langendam, yyAnnamaria Staiano, zzNikhil Thapar, §§Neelesh Tipnis, and zMerit Tabbers ABSTRACT This document serves as an update of the North American Society for Pediatric INTRODUCTION Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) and the European n 2009, the joint committee of the North American Society for Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (NASP- 2009 clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal GHAN)I and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, refluxdisease(GERD)ininfantsandchildrenandisintendedtobeappliedin Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) published a medical posi- daily practice and as a basis for clinical trials. Eight clinical questions addressing tion paper on gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and GER disease diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic topics were formulated. A systematic (GERD) in infants and children (search until 2008), using the 2001 literature search was performed from October 1, 2008 (if the question was NASPGHAN guidelines as an outline (1). Recommendations were addressed
    [Show full text]
  • Abdominal Wall Defects—Current Treatments
    children Review Abdominal Wall Defects—Current Treatments Isabella N. Bielicki 1, Stig Somme 2, Giovanni Frongia 3, Stefan G. Holland-Cunz 1 and Raphael N. Vuille-dit-Bille 1,* 1 Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Children’s Hospital of Basel (UKBB), 4056 Basel, Switzerland; [email protected] (I.N.B.); [email protected] (S.G.H.-C.) 2 Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Children’s Hospital of Colorado, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; [email protected] 3 Section of Pediatric Surgery, Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +41-61-704-27-98 Abstract: Gastroschisis and omphalocele reflect the two most common abdominal wall defects in newborns. First postnatal care consists of defect coverage, avoidance of fluid and heat loss, fluid administration and gastric decompression. Definitive treatment is achieved by defect reduction and abdominal wall closure. Different techniques and timings are used depending on type and size of defect, the abdominal domain and comorbidities of the child. The present review aims to provide an overview of current treatments. Keywords: abdominal wall defect; gastroschisis; omphalocele; treatment 1. Gastroschisis Citation: Bielicki, I.N.; Somme, S.; 1.1. Introduction Frongia, G.; Holland-Cunz, S.G.; Gastroschisis is one of the most common congenital abdominal wall defects in new- Vuille-dit-Bille, R.N. Abdominal Wall borns. Children born with gastroschisis have a full-thickness paraumbilical abdominal Defects—Current Treatments. wall defect, which is associated with evisceration of bowel and sometimes other organs Children 2021, 8, 170.
    [Show full text]
  • Guideline for the Evaluation of Cholestatic Jaundice
    CLINICAL GUIDELINES Guideline for the Evaluation of Cholestatic Jaundice in Infants: Joint Recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition ÃRima Fawaz, yUlrich Baumann, zUdeme Ekong, §Bjo¨rn Fischler, jjNedim Hadzic, ôCara L. Mack, #Vale´rie A. McLin, ÃÃJean P. Molleston, yyEzequiel Neimark, zzVicky L. Ng, and §§Saul J. Karpen ABSTRACT Cholestatic jaundice in infancy affects approximately 1 in every 2500 term PREAMBLE infants and is infrequently recognized by primary providers in the setting of holestatic jaundice in infancy is an uncommon but poten- physiologic jaundice. Cholestatic jaundice is always pathologic and indicates tially serious problem that indicates hepatobiliary dysfunc- hepatobiliary dysfunction. Early detection by the primary care physician and tion.C Early detection of cholestatic jaundice by the primary care timely referrals to the pediatric gastroenterologist/hepatologist are important physician and timely, accurate diagnosis by the pediatric gastro- contributors to optimal treatment and prognosis. The most common causes of enterologist are important for successful treatment and an optimal cholestatic jaundice in the first months of life are biliary atresia (25%–40%) prognosis. The Cholestasis Guideline Committee consisted of 11 followed by an expanding list of monogenic disorders (25%), along with many members of 2 professional societies: the North American Society unknown or multifactorial (eg, parenteral nutrition-related) causes, each of for Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, and the European which may have time-sensitive and distinct treatment plans. Thus, these Society for Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. This guidelines can have an essential role for the evaluation of neonatal cholestasis committee has responded to a need in pediatrics and developed to optimize care.
    [Show full text]
  • Pretest Obstetrics and Gynecology
    Obstetrics and Gynecology PreTestTM Self-Assessment and Review Notice Medicine is an ever-changing science. As new research and clinical experience broaden our knowledge, changes in treatment and drug therapy are required. The authors and the publisher of this work have checked with sources believed to be reliable in their efforts to provide information that is complete and generally in accord with the standards accepted at the time of publication. However, in view of the possibility of human error or changes in medical sciences, neither the authors nor the publisher nor any other party who has been involved in the preparation or publication of this work warrants that the information contained herein is in every respect accurate or complete, and they disclaim all responsibility for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from use of the information contained in this work. Readers are encouraged to confirm the information contained herein with other sources. For example and in particular, readers are advised to check the prod- uct information sheet included in the package of each drug they plan to administer to be certain that the information contained in this work is accurate and that changes have not been made in the recommended dose or in the contraindications for administration. This recommendation is of particular importance in connection with new or infrequently used drugs. Obstetrics and Gynecology PreTestTM Self-Assessment and Review Twelfth Edition Karen M. Schneider, MD Associate Professor Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences University of Texas Houston Medical School Houston, Texas Stephen K. Patrick, MD Residency Program Director Obstetrics and Gynecology The Methodist Health System Dallas Dallas, Texas New York Chicago San Francisco Lisbon London Madrid Mexico City Milan New Delhi San Juan Seoul Singapore Sydney Toronto Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
    [Show full text]