Statistical Analysis Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Statistical Analysis Plan Cover Page for Statistical Analysis Plan Sponsor name: Novo Nordisk A/S NCT number NCT03061214 Sponsor trial ID: NN9535-4114 Official title of study: SUSTAINTM CHINA - Efficacy and safety of semaglutide once-weekly versus sitagliptin once-daily as add-on to metformin in subjects with type 2 diabetes Document date: 22 August 2019 Semaglutide s.c (Ozempic®) Date: 22 August 2019 Novo Nordisk Trial ID: NN9535-4114 Version: 1.0 CONFIDENTIAL Clinical Trial Report Status: Final Appendix 16.1.9 16.1.9 Documentation of statistical methods List of contents Statistical analysis plan...................................................................................................................... /LQN Statistical documentation................................................................................................................... /LQN Redacted VWDWLVWLFDODQDO\VLVSODQ Includes redaction of personal identifiable information only. Statistical Analysis Plan Date: 28 May 2019 Novo Nordisk Trial ID: NN9535-4114 Version: 1.0 CONFIDENTIAL UTN:U1111-1149-0432 Status: Final EudraCT No.:NA Page: 1 of 30 Statistical Analysis Plan Trial ID: NN9535-4114 Efficacy and safety of semaglutide once-weekly versus sitagliptin once-daily as add-on to metformin in subjects with type 2 diabetes Author Biostatistics Semaglutide s.c. This confidential document is the property of Novo Nordisk. No unpublished information contained herein may be disclosed without prior written approval from Novo Nordisk. Access to this document must be restricted to relevant parties.This confidential document is the property of Novo Nordisk. No unpublished information contained herein may be disclosed without prior written approval from Novo Nordisk. Access to this document must be restricted to relevant parties. Statistical Analysis Plan Date: 28 May 2019 Novo Nordisk Trial ID: NN9535-4114 Version: 1.0 CONFIDENTIAL UTN:U1111-1149-0432 Status: Final EudraCT No.:NA Page: 2 of 30 Table of contents Page Table of contents.........................................................................................................................................2 List of abbreviations ...................................................................................................................................3 1 Introduction .........................................................................................................................................4 1.1 Trial information.......................................................................................................................4 1.2 Scope of the statistical analysis plan..........................................................................................4 2 Statistical considerations .....................................................................................................................5 2.1 General considerations ..............................................................................................................5 2.2 Sample size calculation .............................................................................................................6 2.3 Definition of analysis sets..........................................................................................................7 2.4 Primary endpoint.....................................................................................................................10 2.5 Secondary endpoints ...............................................................................................................16 2.5.1 Confirmatory secondary endpoints .........................................................................16 2.5.2 Supportive secondary endpoints .............................................................................18 2.5.2.1 Efficacy endpoints............................................................................18 2.5.2.2 Safety endpoints...............................................................................20 2.6 Health economics and/or patient reported outcomes.................................................................25 2.7 China cohort ...........................................................................................................................25 3 Changes to the statistical analyses planned in the protocol ..............................................................27 4 References ..........................................................................................................................................30 Statistical Analysis Plan Date: 28 May 2019 Novo Nordisk Trial ID: NN9535-4114 Version: 1.0 CONFIDENTIAL UTN:U1111-1149-0432 Status: Final EudraCT No.:NA Page: 3 of 30 List of abbreviations AACE American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists ADA American Diabetes Association AE adverse event ANCOVA analysis of covariance BG blood glucose BMI body mass index CTR clinical trial report DTSQ Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire status EAC event adjudication committee ECG electrocardiogram FAS full analysis set GLP-1 glucagon-like peptide-1 HDL high density lipoprotein hsCRP highly sensitive C-reactive protein ITT intention to treat IWRS interactive voice/web response system LLOQ lower limit of quantification LOCF last observation carried forward MAR missing at random MCAR missing completely at random MCMC markow chain Monte Carlo MedDRA Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities NDA new drug application PP per protocol PRO patient reported outcome PT preferred term REML restricted maximum likelihood SAP statistical analysis plan SAS safety analysis set s.c. subcutanous SD standard deviation SE standard error TEAE treatment emergent adverse event Statistical Analysis Plan Date: 28 May 2019 Novo Nordisk Trial ID: NN9535-4114 Version: 1.0 CONFIDENTIAL UTN:U1111-1149-0432 Status: Final EudraCT No.:NA Page: 4 of 30 1 Introduction 1.1 Trial information This is a 30-week randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, multi-centre, multinational trial, four-armed, parallel-group trial comparing semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1.0 mg once weekly against sitagliptin 100 mg once-daily. Primary objective To compare the effect of once-weekly dosing of two dose levels of semaglutide versus sitagliptin 100 mg once-daily on glycaemic control after 30 weeks of treatment. To further detail the primary objective an estimand is defined which is an efficacy estimand. The scientific question is: ! What is the treatment difference between semaglutide and sitagliptin at week 30 for all randomised subjects if all subjects completed treatment and did not initiate rescue medication ! The population is defined by the inclusion/exclusion criteria of the trial ! The primary endpoint is change from baseline in HbA1c after 30 weeks of treatment ! Only data collected before the occurrence of the intercurrent events initiation of rescue medication and discontinuation of trial product are used in the analysis. Secondary objectives To compare the effects of once-weekly dosing of two dose levels of semaglutide versus sitagliptin 100 mg once-daily after 30 weeks of treatment on: ! Inducing and maintaining weight loss ! Other parameters of efficacy, safety and tolerability An estimand similar to the one for the primary objective is defined for the secondary objective as addressed by weight loss, however with ‘change from baseline in HbA1c after 30 weeks’ replaced by ‘change from baseline in body weight after 30 weeks of treatment’. 1.2 Scope of the statistical analysis plan This SAP is based on the protocol “Efficacy and safety of semaglutide once-weekly versus sitagliptin once-daily as add-on to metformin in subjects with type 2 diabetes”, version 3.0, and amendment 3. The SAP is relevant both for the analysis of data for the entire trial population and for the analysis of the China cohort by it self. See Section 2.7. Statistical Analysis Plan Date: 28 May 2019 Novo Nordisk Trial ID: NN9535-4114 Version: 1.0 CONFIDENTIAL UTN:U1111-1149-0432 Status: Final EudraCT No.:NA Page: 5 of 30 2 Statistical considerations 2.1 General considerations Results from the statistical analysis will generally be presented by two-sided confidence intervals with a confidence level of 95% and associated p-value. Superiority will be formulated and tested as one-sided hypotheses at a 2.5% significance level. Non-inferiority between two treatments will be evaluated by comparing the upper limit of the associated two-sided 95% confidence interval for the difference with the pre-defined non-inferiority margin. The two sitagliptin/semaglutide placebo groups will be pooled in all outputs if not otherwise specified. When grouping or analysing data by country, subjects from Hong Kong and Taiwan will be grouped with Chinese subjects if not otherwise specified. The same is done when grouping or analysing by region China/Other where subjects from South Africa, Korea, Brazil and Ukraine will be analysed together in the group referred to as “Other”. Data transformations A number of the continuous parameters will be log-transformed prior to statistical analysis. The output tables and figures will show the results of the analysis back-transformed to the original scale, implying that log-treatment-differences are reported as treatment ratios. Confidence intervals for the treatment ratios will be calculated as exponentiated upper and lower limits for log-treatment difference confidence intervals. The standard errors (SE) of the back-transformed mean and ratio to baseline estimates are also provided; these SEs are
Recommended publications
  • Breast Cysts
    Beaumont Hospital Patient Information on Breast Cysts PRINTROOM PDF 23012017 SUP190B What are breast cysts? The breasts are made up of lobules (milk- producing glands) and ducts (tubes that carry milk to the nipple), surrounded by fatty and supportive tissue. Sometimes fluid-filled sacs develop in the breast tissue. These are breast cysts. It’s thought that they develop naturally as the breast ages and changes. Although you can develop breast cysts at any age, they are most common in women over 35 who haven’t yet reached menopause. They occur more frequently as women approach the menopause and usually resolve or are less frequent after it. However, they may persist or develop in women who take hormone replacement therapy (HRT) after menopause. Cysts can feel soft if they are near the surface of the skin, or like a hard lump if they’re deeper in the breast tissue. They can develop anywhere in the breast, but are more commonly found in the upper half. For some women cysts can feel uncomfortable or even painful. Before a period cysts may become larger, and feel sore and tender. It’s common to develop one or more cysts either in one breast or both breasts –and this is nothing to worry about. It is also common to have many cysts without knowing about them. How are they found? Cysts usually become noticeable as a lump in the breast, or are sometimes found by chance when you have a breast examination or routine mammography. When you have a breast examination your GP will sometimes be able to say whether the lump feels like a cyst.
    [Show full text]
  • Mimics, Miscalls, and Misses in Pancreatic Disease Koenraad J
    Mimics, Miscalls, and Misses in Pancreatic Disease Koenraad J. Mortelé1 The radiologist plays a pivotal role in the detection and This chapter will summarize, review, and illustrate the characterization of pancreatic disorders. Unfortunately, the most common and important mimics, miscalls, and misses in accuracy of rendered diagnoses is not infrequently plagued by pancreatic imaging and thereby improve diagnostic accuracy a combination of “overcalls” of normal pancreatic anomalies of diagnoses rendered when interpreting radiologic studies of and variants; “miscalls” of specific and sometimes pathog- the pancreas. nomonic pancreatic entities; and “misses” of subtle, uncom- mon, or inadequately imaged pancreatic abnormalities. Ba- Normal Pancreatic Anatomy sic understanding of the normal and variant anatomy of the The Gland pancreas, knowledge of state-of-the-art pancreatic imaging The coarsely lobulated pancreas, typically measuring ap- techniques, and familiarity with the most commonly made mis- proximately 15–20 cm in length, is located in the retroperito- diagnoses and misses in pancreatic imaging is mandatory to neal anterior pararenal space and can be divided in four parts: avoid this group of errors. head and uncinate process, neck, body, and tail [4]. The head, neck, and body are retroperitoneal in location whereas the Mimics of pancreatic disease, caused by developmental tail extends into the peritoneal space. The pancreatic head is variants and anomalies, are commonly encountered on imag- defined as being to the right of the superior mesenteric vein ing studies [1–3]. To differentiate these benign “nontouch” en- (SMV). The uncinate process is the prolongation of the medi- tities from true pancreatic conditions, radiologists should be al and caudal parts of the head; it has a triangular shape with a familiar with them, the imaging techniques available to study straight or concave anteromedial border.
    [Show full text]
  • Histological Tumour Type (Required)
    Histological tumour type (Required) Reason/Evidentiary Support All ovarian epithelial malignancies and borderline tumours should be typed according to the WHO classification.1 There are 5 major subtypes of primary ovarian carcinoma, high‐grade serous, clear cell, endometrioid, mucinous and low‐ grade serous.2‐5 There are also other uncommon minor subtypes, those listed by the WHO including malignant Brenner tumour, seromucinous carcinoma and undifferentiated carcinoma.1 Carcinosarcoma is a mixed epithelial and mesenchymal malignancy but is included in the category of epithelial malignancies in this dataset since most are of epithelial origin and histogenesis.6 Although management of ovarian carcinoma is, at present, largely dependent on tumour stage and grade, accurate typing will almost certainly become more important in the future with the introduction of targeted therapies and specific treatments for different tumour types. This is in part because, although clinically often considered as one disease, there is an increasing realisation that the different morphological subtypes of ovarian carcinoma have a different pathogenesis, are associated with distinct molecular alterations and have a different natural history, response to traditional chemotherapy and prognosis.2‐5 Tumour typing may also be important in identifying or initiating testing for an underlying genetic predisposition; for example, high‐grade serous carcinoma may be associated with underlying BRCA1/2 mutation while endometrioid and clear cell carcinomas can occur in patients with Lynch syndrome.7 The most common ovarian carcinoma is high‐grade serous carcinoma (approximately 70%) followed by clear cell and endometrioid.8,9 Mucinous and low‐grade serous are less common. Approximately 90% of advanced stage ovarian carcinomas (stage III/IV) are high‐grade serous in type.8,9 Most primary tubal carcinomas are high‐grade serous or endometrioid and most primary peritoneal carcinomas are of high‐grade serous type.
    [Show full text]
  • Approach to Breast Mass
    APPROACH TO BREAST MASS Resident Author: Kathleen Doukas, MD, CCFP Faculty Advisor: Thea Weisdorf, MD, CCFP Creation Date: January 2010, Last updated: August 2013 Overview In primary care, breast lumps are a common complaint among women. In one study, 16% of women age 40-69y presented to their physician with a breast lesion over a 10-year period.1 Approximately 90% of these lesions will be benign, with fibroadenomas and cysts being the most common.2 Breast cancer must be ruled out, as one in ten woman who present with a new lump will have cancer.1 Diagnostic Considerations6 Benign: • Fibroadenoma: most common breast mass; a smooth, round, rubbery mobile mass, which is often found in young women; identifiable on US and mammogram • Breast cyst: mobile, often tender masses, which can fluctuate with the menstrual cycle; most common in premenopausal women; presence in a postmenopausal woman should raise suspicion for malignancy; ultrasound is the best method for differentiating between a cystic vs solid structure; a complex cyst is one with septations or solid components, and requires biopsy • Less common causes: Fat necrosis, intraductal papilloma, phyllodes tumor, breast abscess Premalignant: • Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia, Atypical Lobular Hyperplasia: Premalignant breast lesions with 4-6 times relative risk of developing subsequent breast cancer;8 often found incidentally on biopsy and require full excision • Carcinoma in Situ: o Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS): ~85% of in-situ breast cancers; defined as cancer confined to the duct that
    [Show full text]
  • Review Article Pruritus in Systemic Diseases: a Review of Etiological Factors and New Treatment Modalities
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation e Scientific World Journal Volume 2015, Article ID 803752, 8 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/803752 Review Article Pruritus in Systemic Diseases: A Review of Etiological Factors and New Treatment Modalities Nagihan Tarikci, Emek Kocatürk, Fule Güngör, IlteriG OLuz Topal, Pelin Ülkümen Can, and Ralfi Singer Department of Dermatology, Okmeydanı Training and Research Hospital, 34384 Istanbul, Turkey Correspondence should be addressed to Emek Kocaturk;¨ [email protected] Received 20 February 2015; Revised 11 June 2015; Accepted 16 June 2015 Academic Editor: Uwe Wollina Copyright © 2015 Nagihan Tarikci et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Pruritus is the most frequently described symptom in dermatology and can significantly impair the patient’s quality of life. In 10–50% of adults with persistent pruritus, it can be an important dermatologic clue for the presence of a significant underlying systemic disease such as renal insufficiency, cholestasis, hematologic disorder, or malignancy (Etter and Myers, 2002; Zirwas and Seraly, 2001). This review describes the presence of pruritus in different systemic diseases. It is quite important to discover the cause of pruritus for providing relief for the patients experiencing substantial morbidity caused by this condition. 1. Pruritus Endocrinal Disorders. Thyroid diseases, diabetes mellitus. Pruritus is a topic that has caused a great deal of controversy Paraneoplastic Diseases. Lymphomas and solid organ tumors. because it is difficult to characterize and define. Various indirect definitions proposed include a sensation which provokes the desire to scratch or an uneasy sensation of 2.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 IES Annual Meeting Final Programme
    ROYAL ACADEMY OF MEDICINE IN IRELAND IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE Irish Endocrine Society 40th Annual Meeting 14th and 15th October 2016 Stormont Hotel, Belfast Local Organiser: Doctor Hamish Courtney, REVISEDRoyal Victoria Hospital, PROOF Belfast Irish Journal of Medical Science Volume XXX Supplement X DOI 10.1007/s11845-016-1482-y 123 123 Journal : Large 11845 Dispatch : 17-8-2016 Pages : 57 Article No. : 1482 h LE h TYPESET MS Code : 1482 h44CP h DISK Ir J Med Sci Disclosure statement This supplement is paid for by the Irish Endocrine Society. However the meeting costs are supported by the following commercial sponsors: Abbott Amgen Astra Zeneca Besins Healthcare BMS Boehringer Ingleheim Consilient Ipsen Janssen-Cilag Kyowa Kirin Lilly Menarini Merck Serono MSD Novartis Novo Nordisk Pfizer Sanofi REVISED PROOF 123 Journal : Large 11845 Dispatch : 17-8-2016 Pages : 57 Article No. : 1482 h LE h TYPESET MS Code : 1482 h44CP h DISK Ir J Med Sci Novo Lecture Nordisk Lecture 1976 D.K. O’Donovan 1977 S. Bloom 1978 J.H.S. Robertson 1979 A.G. Cudworth 1980 D.A.D. Montgomery 1981 Peter Watkins 1982 G. Joplin 1983 D.R. London 1984 A.X. Bertagna 1985 Malcolm Nattrass Laurence Kennedy 1986 Brian Frier JB Ferriss 1987 Maurice Scanlon TJ McKenna 1988 D.A. Heath AB Atkinson 1989 J. Ward GH Tomkin 1990 R. Volpe KD Buchanan 1991 Michael Besser PPA Smyth 1992 R.V. Ragontte DH Hadden 1993 Bruce Weintraub David Powell 1994 Oscar Croffard Patrick Bell 1995 Robert Lindsay Brian Sheridan 1996 C.R.W. Edwards Rosemary Freaney 1997 Stephanie Amiel David McCance 1998 Robert Turner Randle Hayes 1999 Ian Hay Sean K Cunningham 2000 Stephen O’Rahilly Michael Cullen 2001 Andre Lacroix Daphne Owens 2002 J.
    [Show full text]
  • Report from the Inaugural Australian Pruritus Symposium, Sydney, Australia, August 10, 2013
    Acta Derm Venereol 2014; 94: 123 LETTER TO THE EDITOR Report from the Inaugural Australian Pruritus Symposium, Sydney, Australia, August 10, 2013 Frank Brennan1 and Dedee F. Murrell2* 1Palliative Medicine, Calvary Hospital, 91 Rocky Point Road, and 2Department of Dermatology, St George Hospital, University of New South Wales, Gray St, Kogarah, Sydney, NSW 2217 Australia. *E-mail: [email protected] Accepted Aug 28, 2013; Epub ahead of print Oct 24, 2013 Sir, on the mechanisms and management of opioid-induced The inaugural Australian symposium on pruritus was itch. Frank Brennan spoke on uraemic pruritus, Paul Gray, convened at St George Hospital, Sydney on August 10, a Pain Specialist with a particular interest in burns spoke 2013. The co-conveners were Professor Dedee Murrell, on the phenomenon of post-burns pruritus and Craig Le- Executive Vice President of the International Society of wis, Medical Oncologist surveyed the symptom of itch Dermatology (ISD) and Dr Frank Brennan, Palliative and its management in cancer medicine. Medicine Physician. The impetus behind the symposium A feature of the day was an interview with a patient was the recognition of two facts. Firstly, the significant in front of the symposium participants. The patient developments in the understanding of the pathophysio- presented with a challenging combination of pruritus logy of pruritus in recent years and, secondly, the paucity secondary to a life-long history of atopy and, in later of education and understanding by colleagues across years, uraemic pruritus. Connie Katelaris surveyed the multiple disciplines of those developments. Given that history and immunological results of the patient and the symptom of pruritus manifests in many diseases the made clinical recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Imaging Pearls of the Annular Pancreas on Antenatal Scan and Its
    Imaging pearls of the annular pancreas on antenatal scan and its diagnostic Case Report dilemma: A case report © 2020, Roul et al Pradeep Kumar Roul,1 Ashish Kaushik,1 Manish Kumar Gupta,2 Poonam Sherwani,1 * Submitted: 22-08-2020 Accepted: 10-09-2020 1 Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh 2 Department of Pediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Correspondence*: Dr. Poonam Sherwani. DNB, EDIR, Fellow Pediatric Radiology, Department of International License. Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, E-mail: [email protected] DOI: https://doi.org/10.47338/jns.v9.669 KEYWORDS ABSTRACT Annular pancreas, Background: Annular pancreas is an uncommon cause of duodenal obstruction and rarely Duodenal obstruction, causes complete duodenal obstruction. Due to its rarity of identification in the antenatal Double bubble sign, period and overlapping imaging features with other causes of duodenal obstruction; it is Hyperechogenic band often misdiagnosed. Case presentation: A 33-year-old primigravida came for routine antenatal ultrasonography at 28 weeks and 4 days of gestational age. On antenatal ultrasonography, dilated duodenum and stomach were seen giving a double bubble sign and a hyperechoic band surrounding the duodenum. Associated polyhydramnios was also present. Fetal MRI was also done. Postpartum ultrasonography demonstrated pancreatic tissue surrounding the duodenum. The upper gastrointestinal contrast study showed a non-passage of contrast beyond the second part of the duodenum. Due to symptoms of obstruction, the neonate was operated on, and the underlying cause was found to be the annular pancreas.
    [Show full text]
  • Genes in Eyecare Geneseyedoc 3 W.M
    Genes in Eyecare geneseyedoc 3 W.M. Lyle and T.D. Williams 15 Mar 04 This information has been gathered from several sources; however, the principal source is V. A. McKusick’s Mendelian Inheritance in Man on CD-ROM. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998. Other sources include McKusick’s, Mendelian Inheritance in Man. Catalogs of Human Genes and Genetic Disorders. Baltimore. Johns Hopkins University Press 1998 (12th edition). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Omim See also S.P.Daiger, L.S. Sullivan, and B.J.F. Rossiter Ret Net http://www.sph.uth.tmc.edu/Retnet disease.htm/. Also E.I. Traboulsi’s, Genetic Diseases of the Eye, New York, Oxford University Press, 1998. And Genetics in Primary Eyecare and Clinical Medicine by M.R. Seashore and R.S.Wappner, Appleton and Lange 1996. M. Ridley’s book Genome published in 2000 by Perennial provides additional information. Ridley estimates that we have 60,000 to 80,000 genes. See also R.M. Henig’s book The Monk in the Garden: The Lost and Found Genius of Gregor Mendel, published by Houghton Mifflin in 2001 which tells about the Father of Genetics. The 3rd edition of F. H. Roy’s book Ocular Syndromes and Systemic Diseases published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins in 2002 facilitates differential diagnosis. Additional information is provided in D. Pavan-Langston’s Manual of Ocular Diagnosis and Therapy (5th edition) published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins in 2002. M.A. Foote wrote Basic Human Genetics for Medical Writers in the AMWA Journal 2002;17:7-17. A compilation such as this might suggest that one gene = one disease.
    [Show full text]
  • RD-Action Matchmaker – Summary of Disease Expertise Recorded Under
    Summary of disease expertise recorded via RD-ACTION Matchmaker under each Thematic Grouping and EURORDIS Members’ Thematic Grouping Thematic Reported expertise of those completing the EURORDIS Member perspectives on Grouping matchmaker under each heading Grouping RD Thematically Rare Bone Achondroplasia/Hypochondroplasia Achondroplasia Amelia skeletal dysplasia’s including Achondroplasia/Growth hormone cleidocranial dysostosis, arthrogryposis deficiency/MPS/Turner Brachydactyly chondrodysplasia punctate Fibrous dysplasia of bone Collagenopathy and oncologic disease such as Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressive Li-Fraumeni syndrome Osteogenesis imperfecta Congenital hand and fore-foot conditions Sterno Costo Clavicular Hyperostosis Disorders of Sex Development Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Ehlers –Danlos syndrome Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva Growth disorders Hypoparathyroidism Hypophosphatemic rickets & Nutritional Rickets Hypophosphatasia Jeune’s syndrome Limb reduction defects Madelung disease Metabolic Osteoporosis Multiple Hereditary Exostoses Osteogenesis imperfecta Osteoporosis Paediatric Osteoporosis Paget’s disease Phocomelia Pseudohypoparathyroidism Radial dysplasia Skeletal dysplasia Thanatophoric dwarfism Ulna dysplasia Rare Cancer and Adrenocortical tumours Acute monoblastic leukaemia Tumours Carcinoid tumours Brain tumour Craniopharyngioma Colon cancer, familial nonpolyposis Embryonal tumours of CNS Craniopharyngioma Ependymoma Desmoid disease Epithelial thymic tumours in
    [Show full text]
  • Bajaj A. Vascular and Neurogenic-Cobb Syndrome J Gynecol 2020, 5(1): 000206
    Open Access Journal of Gynecology ISSN: 2474-9230 MEDWIN PUBLISHERS Committed to Create Value for Researchers Vascular and Neurogenic-Cobb Syndrome Bajaj A* Mini Review Consultant Histopathologist, A.B.Diagnostics, India Volume 5 Issue 1 *Corresponding author: Anubha Bajaj, Consultant Histopathologist, A.B.Diagnostics, A-1, Received Date: November 09, 2020 Ring Road, Rajouri Garden, New Delhi, 110027, India, Tel: 00911141446785; Email: anubha. Published Date: November 20, 2020 [email protected] DOI: 10.23880/oajg-16000206 Abstract Cobb syndrome is an exceptional, non-inherited, genetic disorder characteristically constituted by vascular anomalies and neurological deficits. Spinal arteriovenous malformations appear in concurrence with cutaneous vascular lesions within the corresponding dermatome. Dermatome specific port wine stain upon the trunk, arteriovenous malformation, angioma, angiokeratoma, angiolipoma, cavernous haemangioma or lymphatic malformation is discerned in accompaniment with (MRI),hyperreflexia, computerized limb paresis, tomography muscular (CT) cramps, scan, plain sensory radiography loss, bladder or angiography. and bowel dysfunction, Cobb syndrome sudden can paraplegia be appropriately or subarachnoid managed haemorrhage. Spinal vascular lesions of Cobb syndrome can be adequately determined with magnetic resonance imaging with sclerotherapy, endovascular embolization, oral corticosteroids or surgical extermination of vascular lesions. Keywords: Cobb Syndrome; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Computerized Tomography Mini Review birth whereas neurological symptoms emerge around 5 Cobb syndrome is denominated as an extremely exceptional genetic disorder characteristically constituted by years. Incriminated children lack a family history of Cobb syndrome. Of obscure aetiology, Cobb syndrome probably emerges from somatic mutations within the neural crest vascular anomalies and neurological deficits. Cobb syndrome or mesoderm with consequent, antecedent, anatomic withas a anon- cutaneous inherited lesion.
    [Show full text]
  • BSOG-FOGSI Quiz Preliminary Round Conducted on 24Th April at API
    BSOG-FOGSI quiz preliminary round conducted on 24th April at API Bhavana South Zone Yuva Fogsi 2016 Quiz – BSOG round Topic- Gynecological Oncology 24th April, 2016 (60 marks) Name: Institution: Dear participants, Welcome to the FOGSI Quiz 2016 Thirty questions are to be answered in 30 minutes. Circle the right answer. Scratching and overwriting will get a negative marking even if the final answer is right. Each correct answer gets 2 marks and a wrong one gets a negative marking of minus 1.The top 2 scorers will represent BSOG in South Zone Yuva FOGSI 2016 in Madurai on 22nd May 2016. The decision of the Quiz Master is final. Happy Quizzing!!! 1. With regards to the staging of endometrial cancer, pick the wrong answer a. Stage 1a Endometrial Adenocarcinoma is confined to the uterus and involves less than half of the myometrium b. Stage 4a Endometrial Adenocarcinoma invades bladder mucosa c. Stage 4b Endometrial Adenocarcinoma involves inguinal lymph nodes d. Stage 3c2 Endometrial Adenocarcinoma involves more than half of myometrium and pelvic lymph nodes Ans: Stage 3c1 is involvement of pelvic nodes, Stage 3c2 is involvement of paraaortic nodes 2. The average time between HPV infection and pre-cancer is a. 2-5 years b. 15-20 years c. 7-10 years d. 20-25 years Novak 3. What factor does not contribute to persistence and progression of HPV infection? a. Smoking b. Contraceptive use c. STDs d. Drinking alcohol Novak 4. On Colposcopy, Adenocarcinoma has the following features a. Mosaic pattern b. Punctate lesions c. Abnormal vasculature d.
    [Show full text]