Appendix A: Organisation of a Craniofacial Unit

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix A: Organisation of a Craniofacial Unit Appendix A: Organisation of a Craniofacial Unit The requirements of patients with craniofacial abnormalities are very complex and demand a multidisciplinary approach. Many body systems are affected, and every detail of patient management has to be given due attention. Care begins at birth and continues until the patient and his family have been relieved of the burden of the anomaly. A team is needed, capable of delivering expert patient care, and representative of all the relevant disciplines. Data, in the form of histories, physical examinations, and special investigations, are needed in planning treatment, and such data should be used to the maximum scientific effect, to improve present methods of management, still far from satisfactory, and to expand knowledge of the biology of cranial growth and its disorders. Craniofacial Units Sporadic craniofacial procedures performed by a surgeon on an irregular basis invite disaster. Tessier (1971a) estimated that each craniofacial centre should serve a population of 10 to 20 million people, provided that the team performed only craniofacial surgery and treated at least 50 new cases annually. As a consequence of Tessier's example and teaching there are now centres of acknowledged excellence in Paris and Nancy, attracting patients not only from France but also from North Africa and elsewhere. In North America there are now important craniofacial centres in Philadelphia, New York, Boston, Toronto, and Mexico City. Munro (1975) proposed that North America should be divided into seven regions, six for the United States and one for Canada, each serving populations of 20 to 40 million people. He believed that such centres would allow a concentration of multidisciplinary skills and accumulation of experience in the treatment of craniofacial anomalies. This in turn would stimulate laboratory studies into the pathogenesis of craniofacial anomalies. The concept of regionalisation and rationalisation has now been accepted in many countries and has been given some authority by the U.S. National Institutes of Health, which have undertaken to fund only certain designated craniofacial centres. A more diffuse, but nevertheless important, role of the centralised service is to act as a focal point for the manipulation of public opinion towards a more humane attitude towards those people with severe craniofacial deformities. Most of these patients have normal intelligence and the potential for happy and useful lives-if they are not crushed by social ostracism or lifelong institutional care. ' In Australia, craniofacial surgery was begun in several widely separate cities. Independently, groups of enthusiasts in Adelaide (David 197:7) and Brisbane (Atkinson et al. 1979) trained themselves in this very exacting field and undertook to see and to treat patients referred from other specialists in Australia, New Zealand, and South-East Asia. We describe in this section the organisation of the South Australian Craniofacial Unit, as it has evolved since it was established in 1975. The Team 297 The Team The following disciplines are represented: plastic surgery, neurosurgery, ear nose and throat surgery, ophthalmic surgery, medical genetics, neuroradiology, anaesthetics, psychiatry, orthodontics, dentistry, oral and maxillofacial surgery, prosthodontics, speech pathology, nursing, social work, photography, and administration. With such a large and sometimes temperamental cast of actors, there is need for co-ordination at all stages. This is done by the head of the team assisted by the craniofacial registrar, who is usually a surgical or scientific trainee. The unit secretaries play indispensable administrative parts. The anaesthetists are also concerned in co-ordination, especially in the preoperative assessments. Some of these, such as fundoscopy and blood-taking, are distressing for children and can be done during the anaesthetic procedures needed for X-ray investigations. The Plastic Surgeon The plastic surgeon is the head of the team and assumes responsibility for patient care. Special training in neurosurgery, orthopaedic surgery, and maxillofacial surgery is recommended. It has been suggested that craniofacial surgery should become a separate speciality '(Munro 1975). At the time when this was first mooted, it was probably an extreme point of view; however, with the emergence of many excellent craniofacial units around the world and the related need for plastic surgeons who can devote the majority of their time to this particular sub speciality, Munro's proposal has much more validity. The plastic surgeon (craniofacial surgeon) must not only be able to perform the bone surgery, but also to correct the many difficult soft tissue problems associated with craniofacial deformities. The Neurosurgeon It is important that the neurosurgeon's role be seen as an extension of his established role in the correction of the calvarial deformities resulting from craniosynostosis. The neurosurgeon has to assess the various neurological dangers inherent in each type of craniofacial procedure and to give warning if unusual circumstances make these prohibitive. The neurosurgeon is responsible for the preoperative neurological assess­ ment of the patient, and he is the operative partner when the transcranial approach is used for the exposure of the anterior cranial fossa. A high degree of co-operation is required throughout these procedures, with a blending of the techniques of plastic surgery and neurosurgery. The neurosurgeon is responsible for postoperative supervision when there is any risk of intracranial bleeding, infection, or visual loss. The Anaesthetist The importance of the anaesthetist's role is highlighted by the fact that craniofacial operations may last 10 h or more, and are performed on patients whose ages range from infancy to middle age. Large blood replacements are frequently necessary. Because of this, all craniofacial procedures should be administered by the same anaesthetic team so that experience in this exacting work is built up. Intubation and airway maintenance may be difficult because of associated upper airway stenosis and 298 Appendix A Organisation of a Craniofacial Unit jaw anomalies. The anaesthetist is also responsible for the immediate postopera1ive management in the intensive care unit. Two anaesthetic teams work with the South Australian Craniofacial Unit, one for children and one for adults. The Ophthalmologist and the Orthoptist The concept of craniofacial surgery is largely based on the fact that the orbits can be safely moved in three dimensions. Detailed preoperative and postoperative examination by the neuro-ophthalmologist and by the orthoptist are essential. The measurements detailed on p. 77 are necessary in operative planning. Examination of visual acuity, visual fields, binocular vision, eye positions, muscle function and fundoscopy are of obvious importance. If any ophthalmological complications arise, then the ophthalmologist must diagnose and be directly involved in their treatment. New methods ofcomputerised monitoring of vision are very promising, but they are no substitute for careful clinical examination before and after operation. The ENT Surgeon Each patient is examined to exclude aural disease or malformation. Faciostenosis frequently causes abnormalities in the physiology of the nasal airways and paranasal sinuses which should be assessed and managed by the ENT surgeon. The Geneticist Because. so many of the craniosynostoses and craniosynostosis syndromes have a genetic background, the involvement of the medical geneticist in diagnosis aad subsequent counselling is of the utmost importance. The genetic evaluation includes a detailed family and pregnancy history including questions about environmental and medical agents and teratogens. Recording of this information for the description of syndromes is also important. The Orthodontist, Dentist, and Oral Surgeon The dental specialists are involved in the planning procedures. They attend to dental hygiene, make the dental casts and the cephalometric tracings. In the preoperative period they apply the orthodontic appliances for intermaxillary fixation. The orthodontist collects baseline cephalometric data for longitudinal facial growth studies in the various areas of craniofacial deformity, and is also involved in the management of such residual dental problems as are amenable to treatment by orthodontic techniques. The Prosthodontist and the Maxillofacial Technician The prosthodontist fashions prosthetic appliances for patients with jaw anomalies when these are required and also makes splints for those edentulous patients who may require intermaxillary fixation. A specialist maxillofacial technician has been trained The Team 299 to make facial and cranial moulages, to cut and mount the dental casts, and to fashion the cast metal splints used in intermaxillary fixation. He is also occasionally asked to make artificial eyes and ears. The Radiologist The radiologist is responsible for making and interpreting the X-ray investigations discussed in Chap. 7. Routine skull radiographs are always examined as a first step. Three-dimensional tomography of the orbits and skull base is usually needed, and its interpretation needs much experience. Computerised axial tomography is becoming a routine requirement. The standard lateral and anteroposterior skull films taken on a cephalostat are used for operative planning and to plot growth up till the time of surgery, and after operation till stability has been achieved. The Pyschosocial
Recommended publications
  • Genes in Eyecare Geneseyedoc 3 W.M
    Genes in Eyecare geneseyedoc 3 W.M. Lyle and T.D. Williams 15 Mar 04 This information has been gathered from several sources; however, the principal source is V. A. McKusick’s Mendelian Inheritance in Man on CD-ROM. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998. Other sources include McKusick’s, Mendelian Inheritance in Man. Catalogs of Human Genes and Genetic Disorders. Baltimore. Johns Hopkins University Press 1998 (12th edition). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Omim See also S.P.Daiger, L.S. Sullivan, and B.J.F. Rossiter Ret Net http://www.sph.uth.tmc.edu/Retnet disease.htm/. Also E.I. Traboulsi’s, Genetic Diseases of the Eye, New York, Oxford University Press, 1998. And Genetics in Primary Eyecare and Clinical Medicine by M.R. Seashore and R.S.Wappner, Appleton and Lange 1996. M. Ridley’s book Genome published in 2000 by Perennial provides additional information. Ridley estimates that we have 60,000 to 80,000 genes. See also R.M. Henig’s book The Monk in the Garden: The Lost and Found Genius of Gregor Mendel, published by Houghton Mifflin in 2001 which tells about the Father of Genetics. The 3rd edition of F. H. Roy’s book Ocular Syndromes and Systemic Diseases published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins in 2002 facilitates differential diagnosis. Additional information is provided in D. Pavan-Langston’s Manual of Ocular Diagnosis and Therapy (5th edition) published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins in 2002. M.A. Foote wrote Basic Human Genetics for Medical Writers in the AMWA Journal 2002;17:7-17. A compilation such as this might suggest that one gene = one disease.
    [Show full text]
  • RD-Action Matchmaker – Summary of Disease Expertise Recorded Under
    Summary of disease expertise recorded via RD-ACTION Matchmaker under each Thematic Grouping and EURORDIS Members’ Thematic Grouping Thematic Reported expertise of those completing the EURORDIS Member perspectives on Grouping matchmaker under each heading Grouping RD Thematically Rare Bone Achondroplasia/Hypochondroplasia Achondroplasia Amelia skeletal dysplasia’s including Achondroplasia/Growth hormone cleidocranial dysostosis, arthrogryposis deficiency/MPS/Turner Brachydactyly chondrodysplasia punctate Fibrous dysplasia of bone Collagenopathy and oncologic disease such as Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressive Li-Fraumeni syndrome Osteogenesis imperfecta Congenital hand and fore-foot conditions Sterno Costo Clavicular Hyperostosis Disorders of Sex Development Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Ehlers –Danlos syndrome Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva Growth disorders Hypoparathyroidism Hypophosphatemic rickets & Nutritional Rickets Hypophosphatasia Jeune’s syndrome Limb reduction defects Madelung disease Metabolic Osteoporosis Multiple Hereditary Exostoses Osteogenesis imperfecta Osteoporosis Paediatric Osteoporosis Paget’s disease Phocomelia Pseudohypoparathyroidism Radial dysplasia Skeletal dysplasia Thanatophoric dwarfism Ulna dysplasia Rare Cancer and Adrenocortical tumours Acute monoblastic leukaemia Tumours Carcinoid tumours Brain tumour Craniopharyngioma Colon cancer, familial nonpolyposis Embryonal tumours of CNS Craniopharyngioma Ependymoma Desmoid disease Epithelial thymic tumours in
    [Show full text]
  • Genetics of Congenital Hand Anomalies
    G. C. Schwabe1 S. Mundlos2 Genetics of Congenital Hand Anomalies Die Genetik angeborener Handfehlbildungen Original Article Abstract Zusammenfassung Congenital limb malformations exhibit a wide spectrum of phe- Angeborene Handfehlbildungen sind durch ein breites Spektrum notypic manifestations and may occur as an isolated malforma- an phänotypischen Manifestationen gekennzeichnet. Sie treten tion and as part of a syndrome. They are individually rare, but als isolierte Malformation oder als Teil verschiedener Syndrome due to their overall frequency and severity they are of clinical auf. Die einzelnen Formen kongenitaler Handfehlbildungen sind relevance. In recent years, increasing knowledge of the molecu- selten, besitzen aber aufgrund ihrer Häufigkeit insgesamt und lar basis of embryonic development has significantly enhanced der hohen Belastung für Betroffene erhebliche klinische Rele- our understanding of congenital limb malformations. In addi- vanz. Die fortschreitende Erkenntnis über die molekularen Me- tion, genetic studies have revealed the molecular basis of an in- chanismen der Embryonalentwicklung haben in den letzten Jah- creasing number of conditions with primary or secondary limb ren wesentlich dazu beigetragen, die genetischen Ursachen kon- involvement. The molecular findings have led to a regrouping of genitaler Malformationen besser zu verstehen. Der hohe Grad an malformations in genetic terms. However, the establishment of phänotypischer Variabilität kongenitaler Handfehlbildungen er- precise genotype-phenotype correlations for limb malforma- schwert jedoch eine Etablierung präziser Genotyp-Phänotyp- tions is difficult due to the high degree of phenotypic variability. Korrelationen. In diesem Übersichtsartikel präsentieren wir das We present an overview of congenital limb malformations based Spektrum kongenitaler Malformationen, basierend auf einer ent- 85 on an anatomic and genetic concept reflecting recent molecular wicklungsbiologischen, anatomischen und genetischen Klassifi- and developmental insights.
    [Show full text]
  • Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases Biomed Central
    Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases BioMed Central Review Open Access Brachydactyly Samia A Temtamy* and Mona S Aglan Address: Department of Clinical Genetics, Human Genetics and Genome Research Division, National Research Centre (NRC), El-Buhouth St., Dokki, 12311, Cairo, Egypt Email: Samia A Temtamy* - [email protected]; Mona S Aglan - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 13 June 2008 Received: 4 April 2008 Accepted: 13 June 2008 Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 2008, 3:15 doi:10.1186/1750-1172-3-15 This article is available from: http://www.ojrd.com/content/3/1/15 © 2008 Temtamy and Aglan; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Brachydactyly ("short digits") is a general term that refers to disproportionately short fingers and toes, and forms part of the group of limb malformations characterized by bone dysostosis. The various types of isolated brachydactyly are rare, except for types A3 and D. Brachydactyly can occur either as an isolated malformation or as a part of a complex malformation syndrome. To date, many different forms of brachydactyly have been identified. Some forms also result in short stature. In isolated brachydactyly, subtle changes elsewhere may be present. Brachydactyly may also be accompanied by other hand malformations, such as syndactyly, polydactyly, reduction defects, or symphalangism. For the majority of isolated brachydactylies and some syndromic forms of brachydactyly, the causative gene defect has been identified.
    [Show full text]
  • Free PDF Download
    Eur opean Rev iew for Med ical and Pharmacol ogical Sci ences 2015; 19: 4549-4552 Concomitance of types D and E brachydactyly: a case report T. TÜLAY KOCA 1, F. ÇILEDA ğ ÖZDEMIR 2 1Malatya State Hospital, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinic, Malatya, Turkey 2Inonu University School of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Malatya, Turkey Abstract. – Here, we present of a 35-year old examination, it was determined that the patient, female diagnosed with an overlapping form of who had kyphotic posture and brachydactyly in non-syndromic brachydactyly types D and E the 3 rd and 4 th finger of the right hand, in the 4th with phenotypic and radiological signs. There finger of the left hand and clinodactyly with was observed to be shortening in the right hand th metacarpal of 3 rd and 4 th fingers and left hand brachdactyly in the 4 toe of the left foot (Fig - metacarpal of 4 th finger and left foot metatarsal ures 1 and 2). It was learned that these deformi - of 4 th toe. There was also shortening of the distal ties had been present since birth and a younger phalanx of the thumbs and thoracic kyphosis. sister had similar shortness of the fingers. There The syndromic form of brachydactyly type E is was no known systemic disease. The menstrual firmly associated with pseudo-hypopthyroidism cycle was regular and there was no known his - as resistance to pthyroid hormone is the most prominent feature. As the patient had normal tory of osteoporosis. In the laboratory tests, the stature, normal laboratory parameters and no results of full blood count, sedimentation, psychomotor developmental delay, the case was parathormon (PTH), vitamin D, calcium, alka - classified as isolated E type brachydactyly.
    [Show full text]
  • 349 D.R. Laub Jr. (Ed.), Congenital Anomalies of the Upper
    Index A dermatological anomalies , 182 Abductor digiti minimi (ADM) transfer , 102–103 skeletal abnormalities , 182 Abductor pollicis brevis (APB) , 186–187 upper extremity anomalies , 182, 183 ABS. See Amniotic band syndrome (ABS) visceral anomalies , 182 Achondroplasia defi nition of , 179 classifi cation/characterization , 338 description , 32, 33 defi nition of , 337–338 epidemiology of , 181 genetics , 338 genetics and embryology management , 338 molecular etiology , 180 Acrocephalosyndactyly syndrome , 32, 33, 179 prenatal diagnosis , 180–181 Acrosyndactyly repair, ABS , 300–302 molecular basis of , 180 Adactylic group IV symbrachydactyly , 129, 131 postoperative care and complications , 187 Al-Awadi syndrome , 154 treatment Amniotic band syndrome (ABS) APB release , 186–187 acrosyndactyly repair , 300–302 border digits syndactylies , 184 anesthesia concerns of fi rst web space release , 186 induction and maintenance of anesthesia , 43 patient age , 183 postoperative concerns , 43 secondary revisions , 187 preoperative preparation , 42–43 symphalangism , 184 classifi cation , 298 syndactyly ( see Syndactyly) clinical presentation thumb radial clinodactyly , 186–187 acrosyndactyly , 297–298 type II apert hand , 187–188 digital malformation , 297 Apical ectodermal ridge (AER) , 3–5 distal skeletal bones tapering , 297–298 Arthrogryposis , 210 hand deformity , 297 classic arthrogryposis , 305–306, 308 complications , 302 classifi cation , 305, 306 constriction band release defi nition of , 229, 230, 305 Upton’s technique , 299, 301 de-rotation osteotomy, shoulder , 308, 309 z-plasty , 299–300 distal , 230–231 ( see Distal arthrogryposis) diagnosis of , 296 elbow treatment digital hypoplasia reconstruction , 302 muscle transfers , 310–311 etiology of , 295–296 nonoperative management , 308 preoperative considerations , 299 posterior elbow capsular release , 309 treatment , 299 radial head dislocations , 311 Amniotic constriction band syndrome.
    [Show full text]
  • Polydactyly of the Hand
    A Review Paper Polydactyly of the Hand Katherine C. Faust, MD, Tara Kimbrough, BS, Jean Evans Oakes, MD, J. Ollie Edmunds, MD, and Donald C. Faust, MD cleft lip/palate, and spina bifida. Thumb duplication occurs in Abstract 0.08 to 1.4 per 1000 live births and is more common in Ameri- Polydactyly is considered either the most or second can Indians and Asians than in other races.5,10 It occurs in a most (after syndactyly) common congenital hand ab- male-to-female ratio of 2.5 to 1 and is most often unilateral.5 normality. Polydactyly is not simply a duplication; the Postaxial polydactyly is predominant in black infants; it is most anatomy is abnormal with hypoplastic structures, ab- often inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion, if isolated, 1 normally contoured joints, and anomalous tendon and or in an autosomal recessive pattern, if syndromic. A prospec- ligament insertions. There are many ways to classify tive San Diego study of 11,161 newborns found postaxial type polydactyly, and surgical options range from simple B polydactyly in 1 per 531 live births (1 per 143 black infants, excision to complicated bone, ligament, and tendon 1 per 1339 white infants); 76% of cases were bilateral, and 3 realignments. The prevalence of polydactyly makes it 86% had a positive family history. In patients of non-African descent, it is associated with anomalies in other organs. Central important for orthopedic surgeons to understand the duplication is rare and often autosomal dominant.5,10 basic tenets of the abnormality. Genetics and Development As early as 1896, the heritability of polydactyly was noted.11 As olydactyly is the presence of extra digits.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Mechanisms in Calvarial Bone and Suture Development
    Molecular Mechanisms in Calvarial Bone and Suture Development David Rice Department of Orthodontics and Pedodontics, Institute of Dentistry, and, Developmental Biology Programme, Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Finland. Academic Dissertation To be discussed publicly with the permission of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Helsinki, in auditorium 1041, Viikki Biocenter 2 on 5th November 1999, at 12 noon. Helsinki 1999 Supervised by: Professor Irma Thesleff, University of Helsinki, Finland. Reviewed by: Professor Seppo Vainio, University of Oulu, Finland. and Professor Kalervo Väänänen, University of Turku, Finland. Opponent: Assistant Professor Lynne Opperman, Baylor School of Dentistry, Texas A & M University, U.S.A. ISBN 951-45-8960-2 (PDF version) Helsinki 1999 Helsingin yliopiston verkkojulkaisut http://ethesis.helsinki.fi/ 2 CONTENTS 3DJH /LVW RI 2ULJLQDO 3XEOLFDWLRQV 5 $EEUHYLDWLRQV 6 6XPPDU\ 7 5HYLHZ RI WKH /LWHUDWXUH 9 %RQH 'HYHORSPHQW DQG *URZWK 9 Origin and patterning of the craniofacial skeleton 9 Mesenchymal condensations 9 Intramembraneous ossification 10 Endochondral ossification 11 &HOOXODU %LRORJ\ RI %RQH 11 Osteoblasts, stromal cells and osteocytes 13 Osteoclasts 18 Proliferation of bone cells 22 Proliferation during calvarial bone and suture development 22 Apoptosis during embryogenesis 23 Apoptosis during bone and suture development 24 'HYHORSPHQW RI WKH &DOYDULD 24 Developmental anatomy 24 Sutures and fontanelles 25 Suture morphology 26 Suture closure 27 Suture position 27 Sutural growth
    [Show full text]
  • Four Unusual Cases of Congenital Forelimb Malformations in Dogs
    animals Article Four Unusual Cases of Congenital Forelimb Malformations in Dogs Simona Di Pietro 1 , Giuseppe Santi Rapisarda 2, Luca Cicero 3,* , Vito Angileri 4, Simona Morabito 5, Giovanni Cassata 3 and Francesco Macrì 1 1 Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, Viale Palatucci, 98168 Messina, Italy; [email protected] (S.D.P.); [email protected] (F.M.) 2 Department of Veterinary Prevention, Provincial Health Authority of Catania, 95030 Gravina di Catania, Italy; [email protected] 3 Institute Zooprofilattico Sperimentale of Sicily, Via G. Marinuzzi, 3, 90129 Palermo, Italy; [email protected] 4 Veterinary Practitioner, 91025 Marsala, Italy; [email protected] 5 Ospedale Veterinario I Portoni Rossi, Via Roma, 57/a, 40069 Zola Predosa (BO), Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Simple Summary: Congenital limb defects are sporadically encountered in dogs during normal clinical practice. Literature concerning their diagnosis and management in canine species is poor. Sometimes, the diagnosis and description of congenital limb abnormalities are complicated by the concurrent presence of different malformations in the same limb and the lack of widely accepted classification schemes. In order to improve the knowledge about congenital limb anomalies in dogs, this report describes the clinical and radiographic findings in four dogs affected by unusual congenital forelimb defects, underlying also the importance of reviewing current terminology. Citation: Di Pietro, S.; Rapisarda, G.S.; Cicero, L.; Angileri, V.; Morabito, Abstract: Four dogs were presented with thoracic limb deformity. After clinical and radiographic S.; Cassata, G.; Macrì, F. Four Unusual examinations, a diagnosis of congenital malformations was performed for each of them.
    [Show full text]
  • EEC Syndrome and Genitourinary Anomalies: an Update Saskiazyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbazyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcba M
    American Journal of Medical Genetics 63:472-478 (1996) EEC Syndrome and Genitourinary Anomalies: An Update SaskiazyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA M. Maas, Tom P.V.M. de Jong, Paul Buss, and Raoul C.M. Hennekam Department of Pediatrics (S.M.M., R.C.M.H.) and Institute of Human Genetics (R.C.M.H.),zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Department of Pediatric Urology (T.P.V.M.d.J.),zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA University Hospital for Children and Youth, “Het Wilhelmina Kinderziekenhuis.” Utrecht, The Netherlands; Institute of Medical Genetics (P.B.), University of Wales, CardifL United Kingdom We report on a large family with the ec- Structural anomalies of the genitourinary (GU) tract trodactyly, ectodermal dysplasia, clefting may also be part of the clinical spectrum of the EEC (EEC) syndrome. The clinical manifesta- syndrome. Rosselli and Gulienetti [ 19611 were probably tions in this family show great variability. the first to describe structural anomalieszyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA of the GU sys- Specific genitourinary anomalies were tem as an associated finding in a patient, and Preus found. The propositus with micturition and Fraser [ 19731 suggested that structural anomalies problems is discussed in detail. A dysplastic of the kidney may be an integral component of the EEC bladder epithelium might be the cause of syndrome. A summary of all GU anomalies described in these problems. A remarkable improvement patients with the EEC syndrome is provided in Table I. of the complaints was achieved upon treat- In several texts, GU anomalies are either cited as only ment with synthetic sulfonated glycos- occasional findings in EEC syndrome [Temtamy and aminoglycans. 0 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Haploinsufficiency of BMP4 and OTX2 in the Foetus with an Abnormal
    Capkova et al. Molecular Cytogenetics (2017) 10:47 DOI 10.1186/s13039-017-0351-3 CASEREPORT Open Access Haploinsufficiency of BMP4 and OTX2 in the Foetus with an abnormal facial profile detected in the first trimester of pregnancy Pavlina Capkova1* , Alena Santava1, Ivana Markova2, Andrea Stefekova1, Josef Srovnal3, Katerina Staffova3 and Veronika Durdová2 Abstract Background: Interstitial microdeletion 14q22q23 is a rare chromosomal syndrome associated with variable defects: microphthalmia/anophthalmia, pituitary anomalies, polydactyly/syndactyly of hands and feet, micrognathia/ retrognathia. The reports of the microdeletion 14q22q23 detected in the prenatal stages are limited and the range of clinical features reveals a quite high variability. Case presentation: We report a detection of the microdeletion 14q22.1q23.1 spanning 7,7 Mb and involving the genes BMP4 and OTX2 in the foetus by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) and verified by microarray subsequently. The pregnancy was referred to the genetic counselling for abnormal facial profile observed in the first trimester ultrasound scan and micrognathia (suspicion of Pierre Robin sequence), hypoplasia nasal bone and polydactyly in the second trimester ultrasound scan. The pregnancy was terminated on request of the parents. Conclusion: An abnormal facial profile detected on prenatal scan can provide a clue to the presence of rare chromosomal abnormalities in the first trimester of pregnancy despite the normal result of the first trimester screening test. The patients should be provided with genetic counselling. Usage of quick and sensitive methods (MLPA, microarray) is preferable for discovering a causal aberration because some of the CNVs cannot be detected with conventional karyotyping in these cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Concepts Review
    CURRENT CONCEPTS REVIEW GENES AND ORTHOPEDICS : FROM GENE TO CLINIC AND VICE VERSA Ph. DEBEER1,2,3, L. DE SMET1, W. J. M. VAN DE VEN3, G. FABRY1, J.-P. FRYNS2 Recent advances in molecular biology have greatly identify novel genes. Recent technical advances in helped in understanding the mechanisms involved in molecular biology and the completion of the normal skeletal morphogenesis. Multiple genes Human Genome Project (38, 61), which involved involved in normal skeletal development have been sequencing the three million base pairs of the identified, but several others still await discovery. human genome, have significantly facilitated the Mutations in these genes are often responsible for the possibility to locate and identify genes responsible congenital skeletal malformations that we see in the orthopedic clinics. In this overview we would like to for normal skeletal development. Further characte- emphasize the importance of the interaction between rization of these genes and elucidation of the func- orthopaedic surgeons, molecular biologists and tion of the corresponding proteins will undoubted- geneticists. ly provide us with more information regarding their role in normal limb- and skeletal development. Keywords : skeletal development ; congenital orthope- In this review, we present a brief overview of the dic malformations. current knowledge of the molecular aspects of Mots-clés : développement du squelette ; malformations orthopédiques. skeletal disease and illustrate how the recent advances in genetics may have practical implica- tions for patients with orthopaedic problems. INTRODUCTION Etiology of congenital malformations The embryonic development of the skeleton and Over 6000 human disorders exhibit simple gene limbs is an intriguing and complex process, which unifactorial or Mendelian inheritance.
    [Show full text]