The Origin .Of the Borough of Newport Pagnell

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Origin .Of the Borough of Newport Pagnell THE ORIGIN .OF THE BOROUGH OF NEWPORT PAGNELL ARNOLD H. J. BAINES Newport Pagne/1, a Domesday borough and market-town, is exceptional in having been in the hands of a mesne lord even before the Norman Conquest. The relationship of the borough to the lord's demesne is discussed, and its legal and fiscal privileges, its status as a tenth-century mint and its medieval constitution are reviewed. It is suggested that the town originated as a checkpoint and trading post on the Danish frontier during the reign of Alfred the Great; otherwise it could hardly have held its ground against Buckingham. Its privileges were those of its lord, and it failed to achieve autonomy and corporate status. 'There is no evidence as to the origin of the breach of which was punished according to the borough of Newport Pagnell. Burgage tenure standing of the occupier.4 A ceorl's defended existed in 1086, and the name of the vill shows curtilage was a tun but not a burh. The that at that date a market was already in paradigm of burh is irregular, and the mutated existence.' Thus Dame Myra Curtis in her dative singular byrig (used as locative) gave rise invaluable but severely factual account of to the place-name element bury, which is Newport in the last volume of the Victoria frequent in the northern Home Counties in the County History. 1 The documentary record of sense 'manor, manor-house'.5 In the first half Newnort. as of manv of our smaller towns. of the tenth century, say between the last years begi~s with Domesd~y Book,2 and from that of Alfred the Great and the time of Edgar the unique survey we can follow it with varying but Peaceable, the primary meaning of burh shifted generally increasing clarity for the succeeding from a stronghold to a defended town, nine centuries; but Newport was not very new recognized as a sanctuary of peace in violent in the Conqueror's time, and from the later times, the more so as its inhabitants evidence we can perhaps draw some inferences (burhware), not yet comfortable bourgeois, concerning its earlier history. 'The Beyond is were ready to defend it. A borough enjoyed the ; 011 1 1 1 .._.._1_ _ ___ ..__~.._1! __ ...._, ______ 1_.._1__ 1"--' _____ j:. _l_~_L ___ l __ L _____ l..l _! ___ ___ ..J ~llll Vt:ly Ui:UI\.; UUlllll:: Wi:lY LUll HI::~ llHUUI;;ll LUI:: 1\.111!;; ~ IJI::i:l\,;1::," WIUUI UIHY Ill:: I,;UUIU !;;IVt:, i:lllU Norman record. A result is given to us; the therefore became a centre where merchants and problem is to find cause and process' .3 craftsmen gathered. Newport was both a market-town (port) and The word port, from Latin portus a borough (burh or burg, Latin burgus). During 'harbour', 7 originally related to a trading centre the tenth century these terms became almost on the coast or on a navigable river, but came synonymous, but their original meanings were to be applied to any place where trade or quite different. Burh meant a stronghold, not manufacture was regularly carried on and necessarily with a permanent population. An where services were provided for the Iron Age hillfort such as Cholesbury was a surrounding area. During the tenth and early burh; so was a walled Roman site, whether still eleventh centuries a burh needed to become a inhabited (Canterbury) or deserted (Rich­ port if it was to survive at all, and usually a port borough). The term was applied to the house acquired at least symbolic and legal defensive of a person of noble rank, protected by limits, within which men could live, work and some form of stockade or entrenchment, the trade in safety. Those who were authorized and 128 encouraged to occupy town-houses within honour, and he probably had a timbered burghal limits became burgesses (Latin manor-house (heajod-botl) on what became the burgenses). Instead of agricultural services, site of a small castle by the church, where the they paid a fixed and usually small gajo/ or rent Ousel or Lovat joins the Great Ouse. 16 His to the king, some other lord, or both.8 Their successor in 1086 was William fitz Ansculf, tenure soon became secure, and their tenements who held over a hundred hides in the county. could be assigned or mortgaged. The essential William's successor (probably his son-in-law 17 ) features of borough-right, which made it highly was Fulk Payne!, who gave his name to the prized, were fixed money rents in lieu of all or place. The late Miss Cicely Baker always most services, heritability and ease of transfer. pronounced it Panel, but this authentic and In 1086, and indeed before 1066, wherever traditional pronunciation has been replaced by there were burgesses they held by burgage the Latinized form (from Paganellus). tenure and there was a borough.9 The idea of fortification had been replaced by legal The Domesday entry for Newport is protection of tenurial privileges. exceptionally interesting, but needs elucidation; it may be translated as follows: The Domesday Commissioners recognised Manor. William himself holds Newport. It only three towns in Buckinghamshire: answers for 5 hides. There is land for 9 Buckingham, Aylesbury and Newport Pagnell. ploughs. In the demesne are 4 carucates of Of these, the first-named was the county town land, and on it are 4 ploughs; and 5 villeins and a royal borough, half of whose burgesses have 5 ploughs. The burgesses have 6V2 held directly of the king while half were men of ploughs, and of other men outside .the 5 hides other magnates who had estates in the (there are) those who cultivate (for them?). neighbourhood, within a day's return There are 9 slaves, and 2 mills worth 40 shill­ journey .10 The Conquest had transferred most ings, meadow for all the plough-teams and of these estates to new lords, without severing worth 40 shillings besides, woodland for 300 the connection between particular burgages and swine and worth 2 shillings besides, and, in rural manors. addition, 4 shillings come from men who dwell in the woodland. And in all other rents Aylesbury was a burh in the oldest sense; the paid yearly it renders 116 shillings and 4 second element in its name refers to its Iron Age pence. In all it is and was (when received) earthworks, which were renewed in the Middle worth 20 pounds; in King Edward's time 24 Saxon period 11 and were perhaps reasserted for pounds. This manor Ulf, a thegn of King legal and commercial reasons after it once more Edward, held. became a king's manor in 971. 12 Aylesbury had William fitz Ansculf also held the contiguous a market, the tolls of which yielded £10 a year vills of Tickford, valued at 100 shillings, and in 1086, 13 but it had no burgesses and is not a Caldecote, valued at 40 shillings; but these, 'Domesday borough'. Indeed, there is no though they became parts of the ecclesiastical evidence of burgage tenure in Aylesbury at any and civil parish of Newport Pagnell, were later date, though the privileges enjoyed by treated as separate manors. tenants on ancient demesne of the Crown may have been invoked and extended to serve much The surprising feature of the borough of the same purpose. 14 The manor of Newport was Newport is that even before the Conquest it had not a royal estate in the Conqueror's or the a single lord who was not the king. This was Confessor's time, but it included a market­ quite usual on the Continent, where towns and town which was a borough. Before the cities were often held by feudatories of the Conquest its lord was Ulf, a king's thegn and a Emperor or the King of France; but in England, housecarl of King Edward, with a Danish outside Kent, nearly all the boroughs were in name; he and his men also held Tickford, the king's hands in 1066, and were administered Caldecote and other estates in Bucks. 15 In by officers directly responsible to him. The only Norman terms, Newport was the caput of his exceptions allowed by Tait 18 were Durham, 129 where the bishop had exceptional powers there was a qualmstowe at Astwood on the because of the proximity of the Scots, and the county boundary (syremere). 29 Until the late herring-port of Dunwich, where royal rights twelfth century Astwood was part of the were exercised by Edric of Laxfield before the Newport demesne, and the gallows there might Conquest and by Robert Malet after it, until well go back to a time when the manor was in he forfeited them to Henry I. Maitland 19 would the king's hands. In the thirteenth century it include Taunton, which had borough-right would have been useful to the king's justices on before 1066,20 though it had been held for circuit; when there was little business from centuries by the Bishop of Winchester;21 this Buckinghamshire, they would only have to ride may, however, be a development of tenth­ from Bedford along the Newport road to deal century privileges which treated Taunton as if it with it on Bucks ground. The Saxon word were still demesne of the Crown.22 Maitland cwealmstow seems to have become obsolete and Tait both overlooked Newport, which was after the late twelfth century; it occurs in the clearly a mesne or seignorial borough.
Recommended publications
  • Section 106 Agreement Relating to Land at Smiths Yard, Water Lane, Sherington, Newport Pagnell, MK16 9NS
    Section 106 Agreement relating to Land at Smiths Yard, Water Lane, Sherington, Newport Pagnell, MK16 9NS Dated 2017 THE COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF MILTON KEYNES and C.H.SMITH AND SONS LIMITED I and CHALDEAN PROPERTIES LIMITED Planning Application Reference: 16/02614/0UT Milton Keynes Council's Legal Services Reference: PE-015435-EK Legal Services Milton K(:lynes Council Civic Offices 1 Saxon Gate East Central Milton Keynes MK9 3EJ This Agreement Dated 5 tlv 2017 Between (1) The Council of the Borough of Milton Keynes ("the Council") of Civic Offices, 1 Saxon Gate East, Milton Keynes, MK9 3EJ;. (2) C.H.Smith and Sons Limited ("the Owner") (Company Registration Number 00520013) of Water Lane, Sherington, Newport Pagnell, Milton Keynes, MK16 9NS (3) Chaldean Properties Limited ("the Developer'') (Company Registration Number 04337960) of The Old Grain Store, Bromley, Lane, Much Hadham, SG10 6HU together known as the Parties and Party shall b~ construed accordingly Recitals A The Council is the local planning authority for the purposes of the Act for the area in which the Application Site is situated B The Owner is the registered proprietor of the Application Site which is registered at the Land Registry under title number BM319820 C The Developer is a registered proprietor of the legal charge dated 12 August 2013 and registered on 28 August 2013 against title number BM319820 D The Developer has an interest on the Application Site by way of a development agreement dated 12 August 2013 and registered on 4 September 2013 against title number BM319820
    [Show full text]
  • Hanslope, Milton Keynes, MK19 7HL Mawley Hanslope Milton Keynes Buckinghamshire MK19 7HL
    Hanslope, Milton Keynes, MK19 7HL Mawley Hanslope Milton Keynes Buckinghamshire MK19 7HL £1,250,000 Mawley is an attractive 6 bedroom detached period property sitting in over 3 acres off a public bridleway with an opportunity to further extend into stunning contemporary living accommodation, and conversion of separate barn into annex and stables, subject to pending planning permission. The property is surrounded by countryside & farmland, - ideal for those looking for a manageable equestrian property. The house, formally two properties converted into one large home, has been extensively yet sympathetically modernised in recent times but still offers scope for further improvements to the rear wing and potential for a combination of conversions and extension to both the house and barn - see our later note. Mawley has well presented accommodation, abundant with character features to include fireplaces exposed beams, stone & brickwork and slate floors. It comprises four reception rooms, two kitchens, six bedrooms and three bath/shower rooms. Plans have been drawn to transform the rear wing, converting the attached barn and adding a heavily glazed extension along with conversion of the separate barn in to an annexe. The property occupies a plot of around 3 acres to include paddocks of around 2.5 acres with its rural setting and adjacent network of bridleways, paths and narrow lanes makes for a prefect home for those wishing to keep horses at home. This is a fabulous property in a stunning setting which must be seen to be appreciated. • EQUESTRIAN PROPERTY • RURAL LOCATION • AROUND 3 ARCES • DETACHED FARM HOUSE • ABUNDANT CHARACTER FEATURES • 4 RECEPTION ROOMS • 6 BEDROOMS • 3 BATH/ SHOWER ROOMS • BARN & YARD • SCOPE TO EXTEND & CONVERT Ground Floor established flower and shrub beds and mature trees.
    [Show full text]
  • Index Class: Minor Applications Min 01 09/00637
    INDEX CLASS: MINOR APPLICATIONS No. Reference Address Ward Parish Report Plan(s) Page Page MIN 01 09/00637/FUL 111 Buckingham Bletchley & West 14 28 Road Fenny Bletchley Bletchley Stratford Town Council MIN 02 09/01873/FUL Five Acres Bletchley & Simpson 34 44 Nursing Home Fenny Parish Simpson Stratford Council MIN 03 09/01923/FUL 8 Marshworth Woughton Woughton 52 63 Tinkers Bridge Community Council MIN 04 09/02119/FUL Milton Keynes Woughton Woughton 67 73 General Hospital Community Standing Way Council Eaglestone MIN 05 09/02264/FUL Church View Sherington Moulsoe 76 86 Bungalow Parish Newport Road Council Moulsoe MIN 06 09/02292/FUL Church Farm Sherington Sherington 90 97 Church End Parish Sherington Council MIN 07 10/00100/FUL Glebe House Hanslope park Hanslope 102 106 Forest Road Parish Hanslope Council MIN 08 10/00271/FUL 7 Anglesey Court Loughton Park Loughton 109 118 Great Holm Parish Council Index cont……………… CLASS: OTHER APPLICATIONS No. Reference Address Ward Parish Report Plan(s) Page Page OTH 01 09/01872/FUL 1 Rose Cottages Wolverton Wolverton & 122 130 Mill End Greenleys Wolverton Mill Town Council OTH 02 09/01907/FUL 6 Twyford Lane Walton park Walton 135 140 Walnut Tree parish Council OTH 03 09/02161/FUL 16 Stanbridge Stony Stony 143 148 Court Stratford Stratford Stony Stratford Town Council OTH 04 09/02217/FUL 220A Wolverton Linford North Great Linford 152 159 Road Parish Blakelands Council OTH 05 10/00117/FUL 98 High Street Olney Olney Town 162 166 Olney Council OTH 06 10/00049/FUL 63 Wolverton Newport Newport 168 174 Road Pagnell North Pagnell Newport Pagnell Town Council OTH 07 10/00056/FUL 24 Sitwell Close Newport Newport 177 182 Newport Pagnell Pagnell North Pagnell Town Council CLASS: OTHER APPLICATIONS – HOUSES IN MULTIPLE OCCUPATION No.
    [Show full text]
  • Sherington: Fiefs and Fields of a Buckinghamshire Village A.C
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-15826-8 - Sherington: Fiefs and Fields of a Buckinghamshire Village A.C. Chibnall Frontmatter More information SHERINGTON FIEFS AND FIELDS OF A BUCKINGHAMSHIRE VILLAGE © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-15826-8 - Sherington: Fiefs and Fields of a Buckinghamshire Village A.C. Chibnall Frontmatter More information © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-15826-8 - Sherington: Fiefs and Fields of a Buckinghamshire Village A.C. Chibnall Frontmatter More information © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-15826-8 - Sherington: Fiefs and Fields of a Buckinghamshire Village A.C. Chibnall Frontmatter More information © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-15826-8 - Sherington: Fiefs and Fields of a Buckinghamshire Village A.C. Chibnall Frontmatter More information SHERINGTON FIEFS AND FIELDS OF A BUCKINGHAMSHIRE VILLAGE BY A.C.CHIBNALL FELLOW OF CLARE COLLEGE CAMBRIDGE CAMBRIDGE AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS 1965 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-15826-8 - Sherington: Fiefs and Fields of a Buckinghamshire Village A.C. Chibnall Frontmatter More information cambridge university press Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo, Delhi, Dubai, Tokyo, Mexico City Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge cb2 8ru, UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521158268 © Cambridge University Press 1965 This publication is in copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Details of Decisions Made on Planning Applications Week Beginning 23/04/2007
    Details of decisions made on planning applications week beginning 23/04/2007 07/00399/LBC Type: Delegated LISTED BUILDING CONSENT FOR INTERNAL AND Decision EXTERNAL ALTERATIONS Astwood / Team: North At: Stone Cottage Turvey Road Astwood Hardmead PC Newport Pagnell Buckinghamshire Decision date: 27/04/2007 For: Mr T Harris & Ms L Sharpe Decision: Listed Building Consent ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 07/00438/LBC Type: Delegated LISTED BUILDING CONSENT FOR INTERNAL AND Decision EXTERNAL ALTERATIONS Astwood / Team: North At: Timber Frame Cottage At The Bury Turvey Hardmead PC Road Astwood Newport Pagnell Buckinghamshire MK16 9JX Decision date: 27/04/2007 For: Mr N Russell Decision: Listed Building Consent ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 07/00100/FUL Type: Committee DEMOLITION OF TWO SINGLE STOREY GARAGE Decision UNITS AND THE ERECTION OF PART TWO STOREY, PART TWO AND A HALF STOREY BLOCK OF FOUR FLATS WITH ASSOCIATED PARKING AND LANDSCAPING Bletchley And Team: South At: Carwash Valeting And Service Centre At Fenny Stratford Findlay Way Bletchley Bucks TC Decision date: 27/04/2007 For: Mr Paul Stroud Decision: Application Permitted ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 07/00304/FUL Type: Delegated DEMOLITION OF EXISTING BARN AND COAL Decision CHUTE, ERECTION OF TWO STOREY SIDE EXTENSION
    [Show full text]
  • Accounts of the Constables of Bristol Castle
    BRISTOL RECORD SOCIETY'S PUBLICATIONS General Editor: PROFESSOR PATRICK MCGRATH, M.A., Assistant General Editor: MISS ELIZABETH RALPH, M .A., F.S.A. VOL. XXXIV ACCOUNTS OF THE CONSTABLES OF BRISTOL CASTLE IN 1HE THIRTEENTH AND EARLY FOURTEENTH CENTURIES ACCOUNTS OF THE CONSTABLES OF BRISTOL CASTLE IN THE THIR1EENTH AND EARLY FOUR1EENTH CENTURIES EDITED BY MARGARET SHARP Printed for the BRISTOL RECORD SOCIETY 1982 ISSN 0305-8730 © Margaret Sharp Produced for the Society by A1an Sutton Publishing Limited, Gloucester Printed in Great Britain by Redwood Burn Limited Trowbridge CONTENTS Page Abbreviations VI Preface XI Introduction Xlll Pandulf- 1221-24 1 Ralph de Wiliton - 1224-25 5 Burgesses of Bristol - 1224-25 8 Peter de la Mare - 1282-84 10 Peter de la Mare - 1289-91 22 Nicholas Fermbaud - 1294-96 28 Nicholas Fermbaud- 1300-1303 47 Appendix 1 - Lists of Lords of Castle 69 Appendix 2 - Lists of Constables 77 Appendix 3 - Dating 94 Bibliography 97 Index 111 ABBREVIATIONS Abbrev. Plac. Placitorum in domo Capitulari Westmon­ asteriensi asservatorum abbrevatio ... Ed. W. Dlingworth. Rec. Comm. London, 1811. Ann. Mon. Annales monastici Ed. H.R. Luard. 5v. (R S xxxvi) London, 1864-69. BBC British Borough Charters, 1216-1307. Ed. A. Ballard and J. Tait. 3v. Cambridge 1913-43. BOAS Bristol and Gloucestershire Archaeological Society Transactions (Author's name and the volume number quoted. Full details in bibliography). BIHR Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research. BM British Museum - Now British Library. Book of Fees Liber Feodorum: the Book of Fees com­ monly called Testa de Nevill 3v. HMSO 1920-31. Book of Seals Sir Christopher Hatton's Book of Seals Ed.
    [Show full text]
  • King John's Tax Innovation -- Extortion, Resistance, and the Establishment of the Principle of Taxation by Consent Jane Frecknall Hughes
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by eGrove (Univ. of Mississippi) Accounting Historians Journal Volume 34 Article 4 Issue 2 December 2007 2007 King John's tax innovation -- Extortion, resistance, and the establishment of the principle of taxation by consent Jane Frecknall Hughes Lynne Oats Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/aah_journal Part of the Accounting Commons, and the Taxation Commons Recommended Citation Hughes, Jane Frecknall and Oats, Lynne (2007) "King John's tax innovation -- Extortion, resistance, and the establishment of the principle of taxation by consent," Accounting Historians Journal: Vol. 34 : Iss. 2 , Article 4. Available at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/aah_journal/vol34/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Archival Digital Accounting Collection at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Accounting Historians Journal by an authorized editor of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hughes and Oats: King John's tax innovation -- Extortion, resistance, and the establishment of the principle of taxation by consent Accounting Historians Journal Vol. 34 No. 2 December 2007 pp. 75-107 Jane Frecknall Hughes SHEFFIELD UNIVERSITY MANAGEMENT SCHOOL and Lynne Oats UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK KING JOHN’S TAX INNOVATIONS – EXTORTION, RESISTANCE, AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE PRINCIPLE OF TAXATION BY CONSENT Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to present a re-evaluation of the reign of England’s King John (1199–1216) from a fiscal perspective. The paper seeks to explain John’s innovations in terms of widening the scope and severity of tax assessment and revenue collection.
    [Show full text]
  • 17/00838/OUT Description Outline Application for the Development Of
    ITEM 7(a) Application Number: 17/00838/OUT Description Outline application for the development of 200 dwelling houses, with all matters reserved AT Land to the East of, Eastfield Drive, Hanslope, FOR SiteplanUK LLP Target: 30th June 2018 Extension of Time: No Ward: Newport Pagnell North And Hanslope Parish: Hanslope Parish Council Report Author/Case Officer: Paul Keen Deputy Development Management Manager Contact Details: [email protected], 01908253239 Team Manager: Tracy Darke - 01908 252394, [email protected] 1.0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that planning permission is refused for the reasons set out in section 7.0 of this report. 2.0 INTRODUCTION 2.1 The site 2.1.1 The application site is located adjacent to the eastern settlement boundary of Hanslope and 11km from central Milton Keynes. The site itself is generally flat, low- lying, grassland used for pastoral grazing, denoted by well-maintained mature hedgerow, with trees along its southern, western and eastern boundaries. It is currently within agricultural use (Grade 3 classification). 2.1.2 The site lies outside the development boundary of Hanslope and therefore within the open countryside. The site is however immediately adjacent to existing residential properties along Eastfield Drive and Newport Road. 2.1.3 Hanslope is defined as a ‘Selected Village’ within the Milton Keynes Core Strategy 2013. 2.1.4 There are a number of routes within the locality, the main routes being Newport Road adjacent to the south-east and Gold Street/Park Road/Long Street Road to the west at approximately 200 metres.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxation and Voting Rights in Medieval England and France
    TAXATION AND VOTING RIGHTS IN MEDIEVAL ENGLAND AND FRANCE Yoram Barzel and Edgar Kiser ABSTRACT We explore the relationship between voting rights and taxation in medieval England and France. We hypothesize that voting was a wealth-enhancing institution formed by the ruler in order to facili- tate pro®table joint projects with subjects. We predict when voting rightsand tax paymentswill be linked to each other, as well asto the projectsinducing them, and when they will become separated. We classify taxes into three types: customary, consensual and arbitrary. Customary taxes that did not require voting were dominant in both countriesin the early medieval period. Thesepay- ments, ®xed for speci®c purposes, were not well suited for funding new, large-scale projects. Consensual taxation, in which voting rightsand tax paymentswere tightly linked, wasusedto ®nance new, large-scale collective projects in both England and France. Strong rule-of-law institutions are necessary to produce such taxes. In England, where security of rule remained high, the rela- tionship between tax payments and voting rights was maintained. In France, an increase in the insecurity of rule, and the accompany- ing weakening of voting institutions, produced a shift to arbitrary taxation and a disjunction between tax payments and voting rights. These observations, as well as many of the details we con- sider, are substantially in conformity with the predictions of our model. KEY WORDS . medieval history . taxation . voting Introduction The relationship between taxation and voting rights has been a central issue in political philosophy and the cause of signi®cant poli- tical disputes, as `no taxation without representation' exempli®es.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Electorate Proforma 11Oct2012
    Electoral data 2012 2018 Using this sheet: Number of councillors: 51 51 Fill in the cells for each polling district. Please make sure that the names of each parish, parish ward and unitary ward are Overall electorate: 178,504 190,468 correct and consistant. Check your data in the cells to the right. Average electorate per cllr: 3,500 3,735 Polling Electorate Electorate Number of Electorate Variance Electorate Description of area Parish Parish ward Unitary ward Name of unitary ward Variance 2018 district 2012 2018 cllrs per ward 2012 2012 2018 Bletchley & Fenny 3 10,385 -1% 11,373 2% Stratford Bradwell 3 9,048 -14% 8,658 -23% Campbell Park 3 10,658 2% 10,865 -3% Danesborough 1 3,684 5% 4,581 23% Denbigh 2 5,953 -15% 5,768 -23% Eaton Manor 2 5,976 -15% 6,661 -11% AA Church Green West Bletchley Church Green Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1872 2,032 Emerson Valley 3 12,269 17% 14,527 30% AB Denbigh Saints West Bletchley Saints Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1292 1,297 Furzton 2 6,511 -7% 6,378 -15% AC Denbigh Poets West Bletchley Poets Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1334 1,338 Hanslope Park 1 4,139 18% 4,992 34% AD Central Bletchley Bletchley & Fenny Stratford Central Bletchley Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 2361 2,367 Linford North 2 6,700 -4% 6,371 -15% AE Simpson Simpson & Ashland Simpson Village Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 495 497 Linford South 2 7,067 1% 7,635 2% AF Fenny Stratford Bletchley & Fenny Stratford Fenny Stratford Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1747 2,181 Loughton Park 3 12,577 20% 14,136 26% AG Granby Bletchley & Fenny Stratford Granby Bletchley
    [Show full text]
  • Newport Pagnell Conservation Area Review
    Newport Pagnell Conservation Area Review Contents 1 General Context 2 Introduction 2 Location 6 Town Environs 6 Geology and Topography 7 Historic Development 7 Planning Framework 8 2 Local Character and Appearance 10 Defining Special Interest and the Management of Conservation Areas 10 The Definition of Special Interest for Newport Pagnell Conservation Area 11 Individual Character Areas 12 Newport Pagnell Conservation Area Review Building Materials Guide 23 Further Afield - Buildings, Structures and Spaces Beyond the Conservation Area 26 Boundary Trees 26 The Setting of the Conservation Area 28 Conclusions 28 Milton Keynes Council 3 Revisions to the Conservation Area Boundary 29 4 Management Proposals 31 A References 36 1 . General Context Milton Keynes Council 1 General Context Picture 1 St Peter and St Paul's from Tickford Bridge Introduction 1.1 Conservation areas are places of special architectural or historic interest, the character or appearance of which it is desirable to preserve or Newport Pagnell Conservation Area Review enhance(1). Newport Pagnell was first designated as a conservation area by Buckinghamshire County Council in 1969 and last reviewed in 1996. In 2009 the conservation area was extended to include the surviving former Aston Martin works buildings on Tickford Street. Map 1 'Newport Pagnell: Conservation Area Boundary and Listed Buildings' shows the extent of the revised boundary. Map 7 'Amendments to the Conservation Area Boundary (27.7.10)' illustrates the additions to the1996 designation and 2009 south Picture 2 Shops on the High Street eastward extension arising from the review. 1.2 To protect the character and appearance of the conservation area a character statement is written that identifies and describes those features that are of special interest or which contribute to local character (see 2 'Local Character and Appearance' ).
    [Show full text]
  • BRITISH BRICK SOCIETY Summer Meeting Saturday 25 July 2015 the FRINGES of MILTON KEYNES BRICKWORKS, RAILWAY STATIONS, CHURCHES Buildings Notes
    BRITISH BRICK SOCIETY Summer Meeting Saturday 25 July 2015 THE FRINGES OF MILTON KEYNES BRICKWORKS, RAILWAY STATIONS, CHURCHES Buildings Notes INTRODUCTION Timgad in a green field: the City of Milton Keynes is an artificial creation, no less than the Roman city on the edge of the desert in Algeria. Some of us remember the land between the M1 to the east and Watling Street (or the West Coast main railway line) to the west as green fields bisected by pleasant country roads and having isolated villages within them. The writer did the journey from Luton to Northampton very frequently in the late 1960s and the first seven years of the 1970s. Along the fringes of the new city the village centres and their eighteenth-century churches remain: Fenny Stratford, Bow Brickhill (not taken in by the new city), Willen, Great Linford. These notes will concentrate on these villages but will also record buildings in two of the old market towns ― Bletchley and Stony Stratford ― now subsumed within the new metropolis. The notes concentrate on three aspects of brick activity: brickworks and their surviving structure, railways and the buildings erected for them, and a group of churches, rebuilt in brick in the early eighteenth century. BRICKWORKS Beside the railway line from Oxford to Cambridge were many brickyards; this is particularly so in the Buckinghamshire section from north of Marsh Gibbon to Woburn Sands. The yards producing the self-combusting Flettons in the late nineteenth century and through to the end of the twentieth century are well-known. But the brickmaking industry around the fringes of Milton Keynes is much older than the last decades of the nineteenth century.
    [Show full text]