Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge Planning Update #1/Fall 2010 Comprehensive Conservation Planning Begins Soon Greetings from the Refuge Manager

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge Planning Update #1/Fall 2010 Comprehensive Conservation Planning Begins Soon Greetings from the Refuge Manager U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge Planning Update #1/Fall 2010 Comprehensive Conservation Planning Begins Soon Greetings from the Refuge Manager Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge process starts. We will hold an informal (refuge) is about to embark on an public scoping meeting in Elko on important multi-year process to develop November 3. More details are on the a Comprehensive Conservation Plan back cover. I hope you can make it. (CCP) for the refuge. This plan will help We will frequently refer to background guide overall refuge management for the materials provided in this planning update next 15 years. Your ideas and comments (Planning Update #1) throughout the will be an important part of the process, CCP process. Please try to read it before so I’d like to invite you to participate. our first meeting; this will help all of us Before we begin the process, I’d like to start on the same page, so to speak, when provide background about the refuge’s we begin our public scoping meetings. View of Ruby Marsh facing west / FWS history and current management. I hope you’ll feel free to contact me or You’ll also find some information about Mark Pelz, Refuge Planner, if you have the National Wildlife Refuge System any questions. See page 7 to learn about Table of Contents and how comprehensive conservation the CCP and page 8 for our phone planning fits into the overall picture of numbers and e-mail addresses. Greetings from the Refuge Manager .....1 refuge management. What is the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Planning will officially begin in Guy Wagner Service?.......................................................1 November when our public scoping Guy Wagner, Refuge Manager What is the National Wildlife Refuge System?..........................................2 What is the mission of the What is the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Refuge System?..........................................2 The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service governments with their wildlife and What’s in a name? .....................................2 (FWS) is the principal federal agency habitat conservation efforts. Project location and watershed .............3 responsible for conserving, protecting, The FWS also oversees the Federal and enhancing fish, wildlife, plants, and Refuge acquisition history .......................3 Assistance program that distributes their habitats for the continuing benefit hundreds of millions of dollars in excise Refuge purposes ........................................4 of the American people. taxes on fishing and hunting equipment What activities can be enjoyed The FWS manages the 150-million acre to state fish and wildlife agencies. at refuges? ..................................................4 National Wildlife Refuge System, which Compatibility of refuge uses ...................4 encompasses more than 552 refuges, thousands of small wetlands, and other Ruby Lake Refuge today ...........................5 special management areas. What is a CCP? ...........................................7 It also operates 66 national fish What are the goals of this hatcheries, 64 fishery resource offices, planning process? .....................................7 and 78 ecological services field stations. CCP Schedule .............................................7 The agency enforces federal wildlife laws, Public Meeting...........................................8 administers the Endangered Species Act, manages migratory bird populations, Help us plan the future .............................8 restores nationally significant fisheries, Please feel free to contact us! ................8 conserves and restores wildlife habitat such as wetlands, and helps foreign Tundra swans / FWS 2 What is the National Wildlife Refuge System? What’s in a name? Many people confuse state and federal In 1903 President Theodore Roosevelt 20.6 million acres in the Refuge System fish and wildlife agencies because their protected an island with nesting pelicans, are managed as wilderness under the names are similar. The U.S. Fish and herons, ibis, and roseate spoonbills in Wilderness Act of 1964. Wildlife Service (FWS) is a federal Florida’s Indian River from feather In 1997 Congress passed the National agency within the U.S. Department of collectors who were decimating their Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Interior. The Nevada Department of colonies. He established Pelican Island as Act (Act), legislation that provides clear Wildlife (NDOW) is a state agency. the nation’s first bird sanctuary and went guidance for the management of the Our names are similar and so are our on to establish many other sanctuaries Refuge System. The act includes a new missions: Both agencies are dedicated for wildlife during his tenure. This small statutory mission statement and directs to wildlife conservation for the benefit network of sanctuaries continued to the FWS to manage the Refuge Sys- of present and future generations. expand, later becoming the National tem as a national system of lands and Our jurisdictions are different. The Wildlife Refuge System (Refuge System). waters devoted to conserving wildlife FWS is the lead agency responsible for Today, over 100 years later, Ruby Lake and maintaining the biological integrity federally-listed species and migratory Refuge is one of 552 National Wildlife of ecosystems. birds, whether they are located on Refuges encompassing more than 150 This law requires the FWS to develop a federal, state, or private lands. The million acres nationwide. The Refuge comprehensive conservation plan (CCP) NDOW has primary responsibility for System is the largest system of lands for each refuge. It also states that certain resident fish and wildlife on state and in the world primarily dedicated to the wildlife-dependent recreational uses private lands and oversees state-listed conservation of wildlife. It is spread are priority public uses on refuges and species. Ruby Lake Refuge is managed across 50 states, American Samoa, strengthens the compatibility determina- by the FWS, which coordinates Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, tion process for assuring that these and with NDOW on a variety of natural Johnston Atoll, Midway Atoll, and other activities do not conflict with refuge resource management issues. several other Pacific Islands. About management purposes and goals. “Wild beasts and birds are by right not the What is the mission of property merely of people who are alive today, the Refuge System? but the property of unknown generations whose National Wildlife Refuges are places belongings we have no right to squander.” where “wildlife comes first.” “The mission of the National Wildlife President Theodore Roosevelt Refuge System is to administer a national network of lands and waters for the conservation, management, and where appropriate, restoration of the fish, wildlife, and plant resources and their habitats within the United States for the benefit of present and future generations of Americans.” Lands within the Refuge System are managed first and foremost for the benefit of fish, wildlife, plants, and their habitats. Our mission differs from other federal agencies, such as the U.S. Forest Service, which focuses on forest stewardship and sustainable forest uses; the Bureau of Land Management, which deals with the productivity and multiple use of the land; and the National Park Service, which conserves scenery, wildlife, and historic objects for people’s recreational enjoyment. Canvasbacks / FWS 3 end of the marsh were acquired. The first Refuge tract totaling 41 acres was acquired in 1941. In 1959, 80 acres of public domain acquisition history land were withdrawn for the Refuge by Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge Public Land Order (PLO) 1878. In 1965, was established by President Franklin 1,655 acres were acquired with funding D. Roosevelt in 1938 as a “...refuge and from the Migratory Bird Conservation breeding ground for migratory birds and Fund. In 1970, 440 more acres of public other wildlife.” The initial acquisition domain lands were withdrawn for the boundary included approximate 37,540 Refuge (PLO 4795). acres. In 1938, four tracts were acquired In 2002, the Refuge acquired an totaling 28,322 acres. That same year, an additional 1,655 acres through a land additional 6,058 acres were withdrawn exchange. In 2006, 645 acres of Bureau from the public domain. of Land Management public domain Between 1940 and 1970, a number of land were legislatively transferred to the tracts along the eastern edge of the Service to be managed as part of Ruby marsh and a large tract along the south Lake Refuge. White-faced ibis / FWS “[Ruby Lake] is one of the most important marsh areas in the desert country between Utah and California” D.H. Madsen, Superintendent Bear River Migratory Bird Refuge, May 13, 1929 Project location and watershed Ruby Lake Refuge is located at the foot of the Ruby Mountains in northeastern Nevada, just over 60 miles south of Elko. The Refuge is located within the Ruby Valley watershed. The Refuge is bordered by Humboldt National Forest to the west, Bureau of Land Management lands to the south and east, and private lands to the north. Nevada Department of Wildlife-admin- istered Franklin Lake Wildlife Manage- ment Area is located approximately 1.5 miles north of the Refuge. 4 Refuge purposes Compatibility of What activities The purposes identified below for Ruby refuge uses can be enjoyed at Lake Refuge are defined by language within a number of acts of Congress Prior to allowing various public uses on refuges?
Recommended publications
  • Human Rights Brief a Legal Resource for the International Human Rights Community
    Human Rights Brief A Legal Resource for the International Human Rights Community Volume 10 Issue 2 American Indian Land Rights in the Inter-American System: Dann v. United States by lnbal Sansani* On July 29, 2002, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (Commission), an organ of the Organization of American States (OAS) headquartered in Washington, D.C., released its long-awaited preliminary merits report to the public, stating that the U.S. government is violating international human rights in its treatment of Western Shoshone elders Carrie and Mary Dann. This is the first decision of the Commission, or of any international body, finding that the United States has violated the rights of American Indians. The Commission’s preliminary merits report had already been released to the parties on October 15, 2001, in response to a petition filed on April 2, 1993 by the Indian Law Resource Center (ILRC), a non-profit legal advocacy organization based in Helena, Montana. The ILRC brought the petition on behalf of the Dann sisters—American Indians, U.S. citizens, and members of the Dann Band of the Western Shoshone Nation. The petition charged the United States with illegally depriving the Dann sisters and other members of the Western Shoshone Nation of their ancestral lands. The Commission’s preliminary merits report supported the Danns’ argument that the U.S. government used illegitimate means to gain control of Western Shoshone ancestral lands through the Indian Claims Commission (ICC), a now defunct administrative tribunal established by Congress in 1946 to determine outstanding American Indian land title disputes and to award compensation for land titles that had been extinguished.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Elko Guide
    STAY & PLAY MORE THAN 17,000 SQUARE FEET OF PURE GAMING SATISFACTION AWAITS YOU AT RED LION HOTEL & CASINO. FIND A WIDE VARIETY OF ALL THE HOTTEST SLOTS AND AN EXCITING SELECTION OF TABLE GAMES INCLUDING BLACKJACK, 3CARD POKER, CRAPS, ROULETTE, AND MORE. YOU’LL ENJOY THE FINEST SPORTS BOOK AND THE ONLY LIVE POKER ROOM IN ELKO. GC: 2050 Idaho Street | Elko, NV 89801 | 775-738-8421 | 800-621-1332 RL: 2065 Idaho Street | Elko, NV 89801 | 775-738-2111 | 800-545-0444 HD: 3015 Idaho Street | Elko, NV 89801 | 775-738-8425 | 888-394-8303 wELKOme to Elko, Nevada! hether you call Elko home, are passing through or plan to come and stay a while, we are confident you’ll find something Elko Convention & Wnew and exciting as you #ExploreElko! Visitors Authority 2020 Elko is a vibrant community offering great Board of Directors food; a wide selection of meeting, conference and lodging accommodation options; wonderful events Matt McCarty, Chair throughout the year; art, museums and historical Delmo Andreozzi attractions and an abundance of outdoor recreation Dave Zornes Toni Jewell opportunities. Chip Stone Whether you’re a trail-blazing, peak bagging, galloping adrenaline junkie or an art strolling, line casting, Sunday driving seeker, your adventure starts Follow us on here, the 2020 Visitors Guide, showcasing all the Elko social media! area has to offer. #ExploreElko, @ExploreElko On behalf of the Elko Convention & Visitors Authority and the City of Elko, thank you for being here and we wish you a safe, wonderful visit! Katie Neddenriep Reece Keener Executive Director, Mayor, Elko Convention & City of Elko Visitors Authority 2020 Elko Visitor’s Guide 1 lko is in the northeastern corner of the State of Nevada, situated on the Humboldt River between Reno, Nevada and Salt Lake City, Utah.
    [Show full text]
  • WESTERN EXPRESS-OCTOBER 1983 Page 1
    R.:S::S:S::AR.CH JOURNAL OP" :S::AR.LY VV:S::ST:S::R.N MAXLS (ISSN 0510-2332) N0.135 Quarterly Publication of the WESTERN COVER SOCIETY OCTOBER 1983 VOL. XXXIII, No. 4 Unit No. 14-American Philatelic Society Express Territorial Ocean Mail Statehood Overland Postal Rates Post Ot't'ices Postal History CONTENTS Page Editor's Arena . ............... ............ ... .. Secretary's Report . 2 California Expresses by Robson Lowe . 3 "Por Fabor de Don Francisco 0 'Campo" by Kenneth S. Greenberg . 9 Stagecoach Wreck by John S. Williams ..............................11 Stalking Horse for the Pony by John M. Townley .............................13 Philatelic Californian Reprint of April 1897 .......... .................. 25 Advertisements .......................... .... l, ~, 10, 24 Annual Dues in Society: Patron $30.00; Sustaining $20.00; Regular $15.00 Advertising rates, per issue: Full page $50.00; half page $25.00; quarter page $15.00 Address all communications to Editor, Everett Erie, 9877 Elmar Ave., Oakland, CA 94603 WESTERN EXPRESS-OCTOBER 1983 Page 1 EDITOR'S ARENA SESCAL '83 AND WESTERN The annual exhibition sponsored by the Federated Philatelic Clubs of Southern COVER SOCIETY California will be held October 14 thru 16 at the Ambassador Hotel, 3400 Wilshire Blvd. Los Angeles. The Western Cover Society has been assigned a spot on Saturday October 15 at 2:00p.m. in the Press Room, for a general meeting and program. Prior to this there will be an informal luncheon at noon at the Ambassador in conjunction with members of the U.S. Classics Society. We hope to see many of our Southern California members at both of these gatherings.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Pi Registration Form
    NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PI REGISTRATION FORM 1. Name of Property historic name: Ferris/Hermsmeyer/Fenton Ranch other name/site number: Jane Ferris Preemption Claim; Hermsmeyer Farm; Fenton Ranch 2. Location street & number: 144 Duncan District Road not for publication: n/a city/town: Sheridan vicinity: n/a state: Montana code: MT county: Madison code: 057 zip code: 59749 3. State/Federal Agency Certification * As theldei gnated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, aslamended, I hereby certify that this X nomination _ request for deterrrjinat on of eligibility meets jjbe documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requrements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property X meets _ does not meet the National Register CriteAa. I 3<x)i'Trip^»fltr1l'T|phis property be/fonsidered significant _ nationally _ statewide X locally. "1^1 ' / rr*\T\ / f\ " / ' / Signature of certifying official/Title / Date / / Montan^ State Historic Preservation Office State or Federal agency or bureau ( _ See continuation sheet for additional comments.) In my opinion, the property _ meets _ does not meet the National Register criteria: Signature of commenting or other official Date State or Federal agency and bureau 4. Nationaltion Park Service Certification I, hereby certify that this property is: \L entered in the National Register _ see continuation sheet _ determined eligible for the National Register _ see continuation sheet _ determined not eligible for the National Register _ see continuation sheet _ removed from the National Register _see continuation sheet _ other (explain): _________________ Perris / Hetmsmeyer/ Fenton Ranch Madison County.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ruby Valley Indian Reservation Of
    NEVADA HISTORICAL SOCIETY QUARTERLY Cheryl A. Youn_g, Editor William D. Rowley, Book Review Editor EDITORIAL BOARD Jerome E. Edwards, Chairman University of Nevada, Reno Michael J. Brodhead University of Nevada, Reno Sheilagh Brooks University of Nevada, Las Vegas Robert Davenport University of Nevada, Las Vegas Donald Hardesty University of Nevada, Reno James Hulse University of Nevada, Reno Eugene Moehring University of Nevada, Las Vegas Guy Louis Rocha Nevada State Archives Mary Rusco Nevada State Museum Wilbur S. Shepperson University of Nevada, Reno 'The Quarterly solicits contribUtions of scholarly or popular interest dealing with the following subjects: the general (e.g., the political, social, economic, constitutional) or the natural history of Nevada and the Great Basin; the literature, languages, anthropology, and archeaology of these areas; reprints of historic docu- ments (concerning people, flora, fauna, historical or archaeological sites); reviews and essays concerning the historical literature of Nevada, the Great Basin, and the West. Prospective authors should send their work to 'The Editor, Nevada Historical Society Quarterly, 1650 N. Virginia St., Reno, Nevada 89503. Papers should be typed double-spaced and sent in duplicate. All manuscripts, whether articles, edited documents, or essays, should conform with the most recent edition of the University of Chicago Press Mallual of Style. Footnotes should be typed double-spaced on separate pages and numbered consecutively. Correspondence concerning articles and essays is welcomed, and should be addressed to The Editor. © Copyright Nevada Society, 1987. The Nevada Historical Society Qualteriy (ISSN 0047-9462) is published quarterly by the Nevada Historical Society, 1650 N. Virginia, Reno, NV 89503. 'The Quarterly is sent to all members of the Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Mail Service Before the Coming of the Railroad, 1869
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 1957 Utah Mail Service Before the Coming of the Railroad, 1869 Ralph L. McBride Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the History Commons, and the Mormon Studies Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation McBride, Ralph L., "Utah Mail Service Before the Coming of the Railroad, 1869" (1957). Theses and Dissertations. 4921. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/4921 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. UTAH MAIL SERVICE EFOREBEFOREB THE COMING OF vitthevicTHS RAILROAD 1869 A ttiftistheftsthefisSUBMITTEDSUWATTTED TO THE department OF HISTORY OF BRIGHAMBRIGITAM YOUNG LVuniversityI1RSIT Y INZT 13 PARTIAL fulfillment ortheOFTHEOF THE requirementsrequimrequam1 L mentsWENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF FASTERMASTER orOF ARTS by ralph L mcbride 1957 00oo i acknowledgements sincere appreciation is extended to many for their help in the preparation of this thesis special gratitude is extended to dr leroy hafen for whom I1 hold great esteem my committee chairman for his valuable assistance and helpful attitude dr briant jacobs committee member is given acknowledgement for his inspiration and guidance the cooperation and assistance of the library staffs of the erigBrigbrighamhenahevahavayoung
    [Show full text]
  • Elko County Public Land Use & Natural Resource Management Plan
    Elko County Public Land Use & Natural Resource Management Plan 2010 0 2010 Elko County Public Land Use & Natural Resource Management Plan Executive Summary: The Elko County Public Land Use and Natural Resource Management Plan was created in the effort to maintain and promote traditional multiple uses in unison with conservation measures of publicly managed lands within Elko County. The directives of the plan are intended to promote active progressive leadership from all levels of our local, state and federal land management agencies. The directives provide directions in developing and improving cooperative relationships between federal public land management and local government and its citizens. The directives also provide insight to help maintain existing uses and establish diversified multiple uses of Elko County’s federally managed public lands. Promotion and implementation of education plans are the keys for the users of our public lands as well as the federal land management agencies to cohesively work for continued and expanding multiple uses and conservation. The plan addresses conservation, preservation and land stewardship that has been the custom and culture of the citizens of Elko County for much of man’s existence in the west. The plan offers detailed history and current science related to the local area conservation and preservation measures, policies and methods implemented by many ranchers, mining operations, recreationist and the general public. The plan also addresses regional and local economics and economic diversity. The plan identifies the need for the development of cooperative agreements and active progressive planning on all levels of public land management to provide the diversity that our economy will require to continue to expand and sustain current levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Shoshone Treaty Activism, US Indian Claims Law & Human
    Western Shoshone Treaty Activism, US Indian Claims Law & Human Rights Violations Nathan Brien Department of History, University of Colorado Boulder April 4, 2017 Primary Advisor: Professor Thomas Andrews, History Honors Council Representative: Professor Matthew Gerber, History Committee Member: Professor Sarah Krakoff, Law Acknowledgments I want to thank my committee members for their thoughtful feedback and interest in this project. In particular, Professor Thomas Andrews provided crucial insights in the writing process. I thank the people in the Special Collections of UNR’s Mathewson-IGT Knowledge Center for their assistance with my archival research. Lastly, I am grateful to my family and dear friends for their love, encouragement, and wisdom. Thank you, Diane, for letting me hole up at your place during the final push. 1 Table of Contents Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………………….3 Section I: Newe & US Historical Perspectives ………………………………………………….14 Section II: Litigating Histories …………………………………………………………..............21 Section III: International Censures against the State ……………………………………………30 Conclusion ………………………………………………………………………………………49 2 In the spring of 2002, a force of approximately one hundred Bureau of Land Management (BLM) personnel, federal agents, and hired rustlers descended on the Dann sisters’ grazing livestock, in central Nevada. Geared with helicopters, four-wheelers, and military-grade firearms, the raiding party made off with 230 head of Dann cattle. The BLM later sold these at auction to the tune of over $59,000 with no compensation to the Danns.1 The same year, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (Inter-American Commission or IACHR) released a preliminary report stating that, in its judicial treatment of the Dann sisters and the Western Shoshone tribe, the United States was in violation of several articles of the American Declaration on the Rights and Duties of Man.
    [Show full text]
  • Efforts to Resolve Western Shoshone Land and Treaty Issues and to Distribute the Indian Claims Commission Judgement Fund
    Volume 42 Issue 4 Fall 2002 Fall 2002 The Indian Wars: Efforts to Resolve Western Shoshone Land and Treaty Issues and to Distribute the Indian Claims Commission Judgement Fund Thomas E. Luebben Cathy Nelson Recommended Citation Thomas E. Luebben & Cathy Nelson, The Indian Wars: Efforts to Resolve Western Shoshone Land and Treaty Issues and to Distribute the Indian Claims Commission Judgement Fund, 42 Nat. Resources J. 801 (2002). Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol42/iss4/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Natural Resources Journal by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. THOMAS E. LUEBBEN* & CATHY NELSON** The Indian Wars: Efforts to Resolve Western Shoshone Land and Treaty Issues and to Distribute the Indian Claims Commission Judgment Fund ABSTRACT Internationalhuman rights agencies have found the United States in violation of internationaltreaties and human rightsstandards by denying the Western Shoshone Nation the use of their ancestral lands. The 1863 Treaty of Ruby Valley did not cede any Western Shoshone land to the United States, nor did it purport to "take" or "extinguish" Western Shoshone aboriginal Indian title. Nonetheless, all Western Shoshone tribes and communities combined now hold less than 28,000 acres of Indian trust lands, about five one-hundredths of their ancestral territory in Idaho, Nevada, and California. The Western Shoshone require a much larger land base to survive culturally and economically in the twenty-first century.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Ruby, Waa Established in the Wilderness of Muritani Nevada to Protect the Tsail Coaches of the Central Overland Mail
    Fprm 10-847 (Sept. 1987) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL SURVEY OF HISTORIC SITES AND BUILDINGS 1. STATE 2. THEME{S). IF ARCHEOLOGICAl, SITE. WRITE "ARCH" BEFORE THEME NO. Nevada XX Architecture, If Transportation and Cosasuncation, 3. NAMECS) OF SITE X? Military & Affaire 4, APPROX. ACREAGE Port 10 acres 5. EXACT LOCATION (County, township, roads, etc. If difficult to find, sketch en Supplementary Sheet) White gja> County, end of Ruby Valley 6. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PRESENT OWNER (Also administrator if different from owner} Mr* JU KM 7. I IMPORTANCE AND DESCRIPTION (Describe briefly what makes site important and what remains art extant) The are the earliest satiating and finest surviving examples of pioneer log construction in Nevada* Fort Ruby, waa established in the wilderness of MUritani Nevada to protect the tsail coaches of the Central Overland Mail. Soldiers of the 3rd Infantry Volunteers began erecting the log structure of the poet in The one-story cabins vere of palisade construction, that is, the valla were formed by placing the logs in 101 upright position ana the interior WBB excavated to place the floor belov ground level. Wooden shakes vere used to cover the roofs. One of these buildings, now used as a tool ' shed, still stands ill excellent condition, and Is only slightly altered. Close by is another very old log built in the more typical method, vith tike logs and placed in horizontal position one above the other. Ofcis one-story structure is also and is in excellent condition.1 site- IMS « sift *U«£bl« for lagiitertt Hietoric Landiaark status XV, IJrmnsportation and dotaraunication.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Area Maps and Details
    580000 590000 600000 610000 620000 630000 640000 650000 660000 670000 680000 OPERATOR RESPONSIBILITIES EXPLANATION OF LEGEND ITEMS 116°0'0"W 115°52'30"W 115°45'0"W 115°37'30"W 115°30'0"W 115°22'30"W 115°15'0"W 115°7'30"W 115°0'0"W 114°52'30"W Operating a motor vehicle on National Forest System Legend roads, National Forest System trails, and in areas on Roads Open to Highway Legal Vehicles Roads Open to Highway Legal Vehicles Only: National Forest System lands carries a greater Roads Open to All Vehicles responsibility than operating that vehicle in a city or other Trails Open to All Vehicles These roads are open only to motor vehicles licensed under developed setting. Not only must you know and follow all State law for general operation on all public roads within the 41°7'30"N T W r int o Trails Open to Vehicles 50" or Less in Width er u Peko C t Guide to Area C Willow Wells applicable traffic laws, you need to show concern for the State. O re A Pk ek R59E R60E C R61E R62E 41°7'30"N L re 93 747 ek Trails Open to Motorcyles Only M I environment as well as other forest users. The misuse of N Welcome W E 753 Roads Open to All Vehicles: i l C l A C o N lo w motor vehicles can lead to the temporary or permanent Seasonal Designation (See Table) Y C v O O er N A L r e C 35 N 36 R N v closure of any designated road, trail, or area.
    [Show full text]
  • RUBY LAKE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Ruby Valley, Nevada
    RUBY LAKE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Ruby Valley, Nevada ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 1982 U. S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service RUBY LAKE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Ruby Valley, Nevada ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 1982 U. S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service National Wildlife Refuge System TABLE OF CONTENTS A. HIGHLIGHTS B. CLIMATIC CONDITIONS C. LAND ACQUISITION 1. Fee Title Nothing to report 2. Easements Nothing to report 3. Other Nothing to report D. PLANNING 1. Master Plan 3 2. Management Plan 3 3. Public Participation 4 4. Compliance with Environmental Mandates Nothing to report 5. Research and Investigations 4 E. ADMINISTRATION 1. Personnel 7 2. Youth Programs 8 3. Other Manpower Programs Nothing to report 4. Volunteer Program 8 5. Funding. 9 6. Safety 10 7. Technical Assistance 11 8. Other Items Nothing to report F. HABITAT MANAGEMENT 1. General Nothing to report 2. Wetlands 12 3. Forests Nothing to report 4. Croplands Nothing to report 5. Grasslands 14 6. Other Habitats Nothing to report 7. Grazing 18 8. Haying 23 9. Fire Management 23 10. Pest Control 26 11. Water Rights Nothing to report 12. Wilderness and Special Areas 29 13. WPA Easement Monitoring Nothing to report G. WILDLIFE 1. Wildlife Diversity 30 2. Endangered and/or Threatened Species 30 3. Waterfowl 30 4. Marsh and Water Birds 35 5. Shorebirds, Gulls, Terns and Allied Species 37 6. Raptors 37 7. Other Migratory Birds 38 8. Game Mammals 38 9. Marine Mammals Nothing to report 10. Other Resident Wildlife 40 11. Fisheries Resources 40 12.
    [Show full text]