DOCSLIB.ORG

Long and Ruby Valley Watersheds Preliminary Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Long and Ruby Valley Watersheds Preliminary Environmental Assessment US. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Long and Ruby Valley Watersheds Restoration Project Preliminary Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NV-L060-2019-0014-EA August 2019 702 N. Industrial Way Ely, Nevada 89301 (775) 289-1934 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction/Purpose and Need ............................................................................ 1 1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Location of Project ........................................................................................................... 1 1.4 Purpose and Need for Action ........................................................................................... 2 1.5 Relationship to Planning .................................................................................................. 3 1.6 Relationship to Statutes, Regulations, or other Plans ...................................................... 3 1.7 Tiering .............................................................................................................................. 4 1.8 Scoping, Public Involvement, and Issues ........................................................................ 4 Chapter 2 Proposed Action and Alternatives ......................................................................... 6 2.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Adaptive Management ..................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Description of the Proposed Action ................................................................................. 6 2.4 No Action Alternative ...................................................................................................... 9 Chapter 3 Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences ............................... 14 3.1 Project Area Description ................................................................................................ 14 3.2 Resources/Concerns Considered for Analysis ............................................................... 14 3.3 Fish and Wildlife............................................................................................................ 15 3.4 Fish and Wildlife - Special Status Species .................................................................... 19 3.5 Fire Management ........................................................................................................... 21 3.6 Soil Resources ................................................................................................................ 24 3.7 Vegetation and Rangeland/Grazing Resources .............................................................. 25 3.8 Visual Resource Management ....................................................................................... 30 3.9 Lands with Wilderness Characteristics .......................................................................... 32 3.10 Wetland/Riparian Zones ................................................................................................ 34 3.11 Wild Horses ................................................................................................................... 35 Chapter 4 Cumulative Effects ................................................................................................ 37 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 37 4.2 Cumulative Effects Analysis .......................................................................................... 40 Chapter 5 Tribes, Agencies, Individuals, or Organizations Consulted .............................. 45 5.1 Tribal Consultation ........................................................................................................ 45 5.2 Agencies Consulted ....................................................................................................... 45 5.3 Individuals or Organizations .......................................................................................... 45 Chapter 6 List of Preparers ................................................................................................... 46 Chapter 7 References Cited.................................................................................................... 47 Long and Ruby Valley Watersheds Restoration Project Preliminary Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NV-L060-2019-0014-EA i List of Tables 2.1: Successional Class Descriptions ......................................................................................... 7 2.2: Long and Ruby Valley Watersheds Treatment Units, Treatment Objectives, and Preferred Treatment Methods ........................................................................................ 10 2.3: Proposed Range and Riparian Development Projects ...................................................... 12 3.1: Migratory Birds of Conservation Concern Potentially Found in the Project Area ........... 16 3.2: Fire Management Units and Fire Management Types within the Project Area ............... 22 3.3: Biophysical Models for the Long and Ruby Valley Watersheds Project Area ................. 22 3.4: Standards Conformance Summary for the Long and Ruby Valley Watersheds ............... 27 3.5: VRM Classes within Proposed Action Treatment Units .................................................. 31 4.1: Cumulative Effects Study Areas by Resource .................................................................. 38 4.2: Past and Present Range Treatments, Fuels Treatments, and Wildfires within the Project Area ................................................................................................................... 39 6.1: List of Preparers ................................................................................................................ 46 List of Appendices A: Figures B: Relationship to Statutes, Regulations, or Other Plans C: Proposed Action Treatment Method Descriptions D: Proposed Action Design Features E: Treatment Methods: Equipment Photos F: Resources Analyzed and Dismissed G: BLM Sensitive Species List for White Pine County Nevada Long and Ruby Valley Watersheds Restoration Project Preliminary Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NV-L060-2019-0014-EA ii Chapter 1 Introduction/Purpose and Need 1.1 Introduction The purpose of this Preliminary Environmental Assessment (EA) is to identify issues, analyze alternatives, and disclose the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed Long and Ruby Valley Watersheds Restoration Project (Proposed Action). This EA fulfills the National Environmental Policy Act requirement for site-specific analysis of resource impacts. The analysis in this EA assists in making a determination of the significance of impacts to the human environment associated with the actions developed to meet the purpose and need. If a determination that impacts are significant is made, an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) will be prepared. If impacts are not significant, a “Finding of No Significant Impact” will be prepared. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Bristlecone Field Office is proposing various vegetation treatments, fencing, spring protections, rangeland developments (e.g., pipeline and fence installation), and other actions to meet land use plan objectives within the Long and Ruby Valley Watersheds (Project Area). The Proposed Action would occur over extended periods of time, as budgets allow. 1.2 Background The Ely District Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan (Ely RMP) (August 2008) divided the planning area into 61 watershed management units with the goal to manage watersheds to achieve and maintain resource functions and conditions required for healthy lands and sustainable uses. Within in the Ely RMP, Long Valley was identified as a high priority watershed and Ruby Valley was identified as a low priority watershed. In March of 2019, the Bristlecone Field Office completed the Long and Ruby Valley Watershed Analysis (BLM 2019a). The watershed analysis characterized the human, physical and biological features, conditions, processes and interactions within these watersheds; provided a systematic approach to understand and organize ecosystem information; enhanced the BLM’s ability to estimate direct, indirect and cumulative effects of management activities; and guided the general type, location, and sequence of appropriate management activities within these watersheds towards the goal of improving or maintaining ecological function of the watershed. The watershed analysis was not an inventory process, nor was it a detailed study of everything in the watershed. The Long and Ruby Valley Watershed Analysis focused on the most important issues as identified by an interdisciplinary team of specialists. 1.3 Location of Project The Project Area is located in northwest White Pine County, Nevada (Figure 1; Appendix A), approximately 30 to 60 miles west-northwest of Ely, Nevada. The Proposed Action would only address the portion of the watersheds within the Ely District administrative boundary. The portion of Long Valley located within the Ely RMP planning area (White Pine County) is approximately 404,235
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Human Rights Brief a Legal Resource for the International Human Rights Community
    Human Rights Brief A Legal Resource for the International Human Rights Community Volume 10 Issue 2 American Indian Land Rights in the Inter-American System: Dann v. United States by lnbal Sansani* On July 29, 2002, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (Commission), an organ of the Organization of American States (OAS) headquartered in Washington, D.C., released its long-awaited preliminary merits report to the public, stating that the U.S. government is violating international human rights in its treatment of Western Shoshone elders Carrie and Mary Dann. This is the first decision of the Commission, or of any international body, finding that the United States has violated the rights of American Indians. The Commission’s preliminary merits report had already been released to the parties on October 15, 2001, in response to a petition filed on April 2, 1993 by the Indian Law Resource Center (ILRC), a non-profit legal advocacy organization based in Helena, Montana. The ILRC brought the petition on behalf of the Dann sisters—American Indians, U.S. citizens, and members of the Dann Band of the Western Shoshone Nation. The petition charged the United States with illegally depriving the Dann sisters and other members of the Western Shoshone Nation of their ancestral lands. The Commission’s preliminary merits report supported the Danns’ argument that the U.S. government used illegitimate means to gain control of Western Shoshone ancestral lands through the Indian Claims Commission (ICC), a now defunct administrative tribunal established by Congress in 1946 to determine outstanding American Indian land title disputes and to award compensation for land titles that had been extinguished.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Elko Guide
    STAY & PLAY MORE THAN 17,000 SQUARE FEET OF PURE GAMING SATISFACTION AWAITS YOU AT RED LION HOTEL & CASINO. FIND A WIDE VARIETY OF ALL THE HOTTEST SLOTS AND AN EXCITING SELECTION OF TABLE GAMES INCLUDING BLACKJACK, 3CARD POKER, CRAPS, ROULETTE, AND MORE. YOU’LL ENJOY THE FINEST SPORTS BOOK AND THE ONLY LIVE POKER ROOM IN ELKO. GC: 2050 Idaho Street | Elko, NV 89801 | 775-738-8421 | 800-621-1332 RL: 2065 Idaho Street | Elko, NV 89801 | 775-738-2111 | 800-545-0444 HD: 3015 Idaho Street | Elko, NV 89801 | 775-738-8425 | 888-394-8303 wELKOme to Elko, Nevada! hether you call Elko home, are passing through or plan to come and stay a while, we are confident you’ll find something Elko Convention & Wnew and exciting as you #ExploreElko! Visitors Authority 2020 Elko is a vibrant community offering great Board of Directors food; a wide selection of meeting, conference and lodging accommodation options; wonderful events Matt McCarty, Chair throughout the year; art, museums and historical Delmo Andreozzi attractions and an abundance of outdoor recreation Dave Zornes Toni Jewell opportunities. Chip Stone Whether you’re a trail-blazing, peak bagging, galloping adrenaline junkie or an art strolling, line casting, Sunday driving seeker, your adventure starts Follow us on here, the 2020 Visitors Guide, showcasing all the Elko social media! area has to offer. #ExploreElko, @ExploreElko On behalf of the Elko Convention & Visitors Authority and the City of Elko, thank you for being here and we wish you a safe, wonderful visit! Katie Neddenriep Reece Keener Executive Director, Mayor, Elko Convention & City of Elko Visitors Authority 2020 Elko Visitor’s Guide 1 lko is in the northeastern corner of the State of Nevada, situated on the Humboldt River between Reno, Nevada and Salt Lake City, Utah.
    [Show full text]
  • WESTERN EXPRESS-OCTOBER 1983 Page 1
    R.:S::S:S::AR.CH JOURNAL OP" :S::AR.LY VV:S::ST:S::R.N MAXLS (ISSN 0510-2332) N0.135 Quarterly Publication of the WESTERN COVER SOCIETY OCTOBER 1983 VOL. XXXIII, No. 4 Unit No. 14-American Philatelic Society Express Territorial Ocean Mail Statehood Overland Postal Rates Post Ot't'ices Postal History CONTENTS Page Editor's Arena . ............... ............ ... .. Secretary's Report . 2 California Expresses by Robson Lowe . 3 "Por Fabor de Don Francisco 0 'Campo" by Kenneth S. Greenberg . 9 Stagecoach Wreck by John S. Williams ..............................11 Stalking Horse for the Pony by John M. Townley .............................13 Philatelic Californian Reprint of April 1897 .......... .................. 25 Advertisements .......................... .... l, ~, 10, 24 Annual Dues in Society: Patron $30.00; Sustaining $20.00; Regular $15.00 Advertising rates, per issue: Full page $50.00; half page $25.00; quarter page $15.00 Address all communications to Editor, Everett Erie, 9877 Elmar Ave., Oakland, CA 94603 WESTERN EXPRESS-OCTOBER 1983 Page 1 EDITOR'S ARENA SESCAL '83 AND WESTERN The annual exhibition sponsored by the Federated Philatelic Clubs of Southern COVER SOCIETY California will be held October 14 thru 16 at the Ambassador Hotel, 3400 Wilshire Blvd. Los Angeles. The Western Cover Society has been assigned a spot on Saturday October 15 at 2:00p.m. in the Press Room, for a general meeting and program. Prior to this there will be an informal luncheon at noon at the Ambassador in conjunction with members of the U.S. Classics Society. We hope to see many of our Southern California members at both of these gatherings.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Pi Registration Form
    NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PI REGISTRATION FORM 1. Name of Property historic name: Ferris/Hermsmeyer/Fenton Ranch other name/site number: Jane Ferris Preemption Claim; Hermsmeyer Farm; Fenton Ranch 2. Location street & number: 144 Duncan District Road not for publication: n/a city/town: Sheridan vicinity: n/a state: Montana code: MT county: Madison code: 057 zip code: 59749 3. State/Federal Agency Certification * As theldei gnated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, aslamended, I hereby certify that this X nomination _ request for deterrrjinat on of eligibility meets jjbe documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requrements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property X meets _ does not meet the National Register CriteAa. I 3<x)i'Trip^»fltr1l'T|phis property be/fonsidered significant _ nationally _ statewide X locally. "1^1 ' / rr*\T\ / f\ " / ' / Signature of certifying official/Title / Date / / Montan^ State Historic Preservation Office State or Federal agency or bureau ( _ See continuation sheet for additional comments.) In my opinion, the property _ meets _ does not meet the National Register criteria: Signature of commenting or other official Date State or Federal agency and bureau 4. Nationaltion Park Service Certification I, hereby certify that this property is: \L entered in the National Register _ see continuation sheet _ determined eligible for the National Register _ see continuation sheet _ determined not eligible for the National Register _ see continuation sheet _ removed from the National Register _see continuation sheet _ other (explain): _________________ Perris / Hetmsmeyer/ Fenton Ranch Madison County.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge Planning Update #1/Fall 2010 Comprehensive Conservation Planning Begins Soon Greetings from the Refuge Manager
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge Planning Update #1/Fall 2010 Comprehensive Conservation Planning Begins Soon Greetings from the Refuge Manager Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge process starts. We will hold an informal (refuge) is about to embark on an public scoping meeting in Elko on important multi-year process to develop November 3. More details are on the a Comprehensive Conservation Plan back cover. I hope you can make it. (CCP) for the refuge. This plan will help We will frequently refer to background guide overall refuge management for the materials provided in this planning update next 15 years. Your ideas and comments (Planning Update #1) throughout the will be an important part of the process, CCP process. Please try to read it before so I’d like to invite you to participate. our first meeting; this will help all of us Before we begin the process, I’d like to start on the same page, so to speak, when provide background about the refuge’s we begin our public scoping meetings. View of Ruby Marsh facing west / FWS history and current management. I hope you’ll feel free to contact me or You’ll also find some information about Mark Pelz, Refuge Planner, if you have the National Wildlife Refuge System any questions. See page 7 to learn about Table of Contents and how comprehensive conservation the CCP and page 8 for our phone planning fits into the overall picture of numbers and e-mail addresses. Greetings from the Refuge Manager .....1 refuge management.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ruby Valley Indian Reservation Of
    NEVADA HISTORICAL SOCIETY QUARTERLY Cheryl A. Youn_g, Editor William D. Rowley, Book Review Editor EDITORIAL BOARD Jerome E. Edwards, Chairman University of Nevada, Reno Michael J. Brodhead University of Nevada, Reno Sheilagh Brooks University of Nevada, Las Vegas Robert Davenport University of Nevada, Las Vegas Donald Hardesty University of Nevada, Reno James Hulse University of Nevada, Reno Eugene Moehring University of Nevada, Las Vegas Guy Louis Rocha Nevada State Archives Mary Rusco Nevada State Museum Wilbur S. Shepperson University of Nevada, Reno 'The Quarterly solicits contribUtions of scholarly or popular interest dealing with the following subjects: the general (e.g., the political, social, economic, constitutional) or the natural history of Nevada and the Great Basin; the literature, languages, anthropology, and archeaology of these areas; reprints of historic docu- ments (concerning people, flora, fauna, historical or archaeological sites); reviews and essays concerning the historical literature of Nevada, the Great Basin, and the West. Prospective authors should send their work to 'The Editor, Nevada Historical Society Quarterly, 1650 N. Virginia St., Reno, Nevada 89503. Papers should be typed double-spaced and sent in duplicate. All manuscripts, whether articles, edited documents, or essays, should conform with the most recent edition of the University of Chicago Press Mallual of Style. Footnotes should be typed double-spaced on separate pages and numbered consecutively. Correspondence concerning articles and essays is welcomed, and should be addressed to The Editor. © Copyright Nevada Society, 1987. The Nevada Historical Society Qualteriy (ISSN 0047-9462) is published quarterly by the Nevada Historical Society, 1650 N. Virginia, Reno, NV 89503. 'The Quarterly is sent to all members of the Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Mail Service Before the Coming of the Railroad, 1869
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 1957 Utah Mail Service Before the Coming of the Railroad, 1869 Ralph L. McBride Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the History Commons, and the Mormon Studies Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation McBride, Ralph L., "Utah Mail Service Before the Coming of the Railroad, 1869" (1957). Theses and Dissertations. 4921. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/4921 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. UTAH MAIL SERVICE EFOREBEFOREB THE COMING OF vitthevicTHS RAILROAD 1869 A ttiftistheftsthefisSUBMITTEDSUWATTTED TO THE department OF HISTORY OF BRIGHAMBRIGITAM YOUNG LVuniversityI1RSIT Y INZT 13 PARTIAL fulfillment ortheOFTHEOF THE requirementsrequimrequam1 L mentsWENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF FASTERMASTER orOF ARTS by ralph L mcbride 1957 00oo i acknowledgements sincere appreciation is extended to many for their help in the preparation of this thesis special gratitude is extended to dr leroy hafen for whom I1 hold great esteem my committee chairman for his valuable assistance and helpful attitude dr briant jacobs committee member is given acknowledgement for his inspiration and guidance the cooperation and assistance of the library staffs of the erigBrigbrighamhenahevahavayoung
    [Show full text]
  • Elko County Public Land Use & Natural Resource Management Plan
    Elko County Public Land Use & Natural Resource Management Plan 2010 0 2010 Elko County Public Land Use & Natural Resource Management Plan Executive Summary: The Elko County Public Land Use and Natural Resource Management Plan was created in the effort to maintain and promote traditional multiple uses in unison with conservation measures of publicly managed lands within Elko County. The directives of the plan are intended to promote active progressive leadership from all levels of our local, state and federal land management agencies. The directives provide directions in developing and improving cooperative relationships between federal public land management and local government and its citizens. The directives also provide insight to help maintain existing uses and establish diversified multiple uses of Elko County’s federally managed public lands. Promotion and implementation of education plans are the keys for the users of our public lands as well as the federal land management agencies to cohesively work for continued and expanding multiple uses and conservation. The plan addresses conservation, preservation and land stewardship that has been the custom and culture of the citizens of Elko County for much of man’s existence in the west. The plan offers detailed history and current science related to the local area conservation and preservation measures, policies and methods implemented by many ranchers, mining operations, recreationist and the general public. The plan also addresses regional and local economics and economic diversity. The plan identifies the need for the development of cooperative agreements and active progressive planning on all levels of public land management to provide the diversity that our economy will require to continue to expand and sustain current levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Shoshone Treaty Activism, US Indian Claims Law & Human
    Western Shoshone Treaty Activism, US Indian Claims Law & Human Rights Violations Nathan Brien Department of History, University of Colorado Boulder April 4, 2017 Primary Advisor: Professor Thomas Andrews, History Honors Council Representative: Professor Matthew Gerber, History Committee Member: Professor Sarah Krakoff, Law Acknowledgments I want to thank my committee members for their thoughtful feedback and interest in this project. In particular, Professor Thomas Andrews provided crucial insights in the writing process. I thank the people in the Special Collections of UNR’s Mathewson-IGT Knowledge Center for their assistance with my archival research. Lastly, I am grateful to my family and dear friends for their love, encouragement, and wisdom. Thank you, Diane, for letting me hole up at your place during the final push. 1 Table of Contents Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………………….3 Section I: Newe & US Historical Perspectives ………………………………………………….14 Section II: Litigating Histories …………………………………………………………..............21 Section III: International Censures against the State ……………………………………………30 Conclusion ………………………………………………………………………………………49 2 In the spring of 2002, a force of approximately one hundred Bureau of Land Management (BLM) personnel, federal agents, and hired rustlers descended on the Dann sisters’ grazing livestock, in central Nevada. Geared with helicopters, four-wheelers, and military-grade firearms, the raiding party made off with 230 head of Dann cattle. The BLM later sold these at auction to the tune of over $59,000 with no compensation to the Danns.1 The same year, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (Inter-American Commission or IACHR) released a preliminary report stating that, in its judicial treatment of the Dann sisters and the Western Shoshone tribe, the United States was in violation of several articles of the American Declaration on the Rights and Duties of Man.
    [Show full text]
  • Efforts to Resolve Western Shoshone Land and Treaty Issues and to Distribute the Indian Claims Commission Judgement Fund
    Volume 42 Issue 4 Fall 2002 Fall 2002 The Indian Wars: Efforts to Resolve Western Shoshone Land and Treaty Issues and to Distribute the Indian Claims Commission Judgement Fund Thomas E. Luebben Cathy Nelson Recommended Citation Thomas E. Luebben & Cathy Nelson, The Indian Wars: Efforts to Resolve Western Shoshone Land and Treaty Issues and to Distribute the Indian Claims Commission Judgement Fund, 42 Nat. Resources J. 801 (2002). Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol42/iss4/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Natural Resources Journal by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. THOMAS E. LUEBBEN* & CATHY NELSON** The Indian Wars: Efforts to Resolve Western Shoshone Land and Treaty Issues and to Distribute the Indian Claims Commission Judgment Fund ABSTRACT Internationalhuman rights agencies have found the United States in violation of internationaltreaties and human rightsstandards by denying the Western Shoshone Nation the use of their ancestral lands. The 1863 Treaty of Ruby Valley did not cede any Western Shoshone land to the United States, nor did it purport to "take" or "extinguish" Western Shoshone aboriginal Indian title. Nonetheless, all Western Shoshone tribes and communities combined now hold less than 28,000 acres of Indian trust lands, about five one-hundredths of their ancestral territory in Idaho, Nevada, and California. The Western Shoshone require a much larger land base to survive culturally and economically in the twenty-first century.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Ruby, Waa Established in the Wilderness of Muritani Nevada to Protect the Tsail Coaches of the Central Overland Mail
    Fprm 10-847 (Sept. 1987) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL SURVEY OF HISTORIC SITES AND BUILDINGS 1. STATE 2. THEME{S). IF ARCHEOLOGICAl, SITE. WRITE "ARCH" BEFORE THEME NO. Nevada XX Architecture, If Transportation and Cosasuncation, 3. NAMECS) OF SITE X? Military & Affaire 4, APPROX. ACREAGE Port 10 acres 5. EXACT LOCATION (County, township, roads, etc. If difficult to find, sketch en Supplementary Sheet) White gja> County, end of Ruby Valley 6. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PRESENT OWNER (Also administrator if different from owner} Mr* JU KM 7. I IMPORTANCE AND DESCRIPTION (Describe briefly what makes site important and what remains art extant) The are the earliest satiating and finest surviving examples of pioneer log construction in Nevada* Fort Ruby, waa established in the wilderness of MUritani Nevada to protect the tsail coaches of the Central Overland Mail. Soldiers of the 3rd Infantry Volunteers began erecting the log structure of the poet in The one-story cabins vere of palisade construction, that is, the valla were formed by placing the logs in 101 upright position ana the interior WBB excavated to place the floor belov ground level. Wooden shakes vere used to cover the roofs. One of these buildings, now used as a tool ' shed, still stands ill excellent condition, and Is only slightly altered. Close by is another very old log built in the more typical method, vith tike logs and placed in horizontal position one above the other. Ofcis one-story structure is also and is in excellent condition.1 site- IMS « sift *U«£bl« for lagiitertt Hietoric Landiaark status XV, IJrmnsportation and dotaraunication.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Area Maps and Details
    580000 590000 600000 610000 620000 630000 640000 650000 660000 670000 680000 OPERATOR RESPONSIBILITIES EXPLANATION OF LEGEND ITEMS 116°0'0"W 115°52'30"W 115°45'0"W 115°37'30"W 115°30'0"W 115°22'30"W 115°15'0"W 115°7'30"W 115°0'0"W 114°52'30"W Operating a motor vehicle on National Forest System Legend roads, National Forest System trails, and in areas on Roads Open to Highway Legal Vehicles Roads Open to Highway Legal Vehicles Only: National Forest System lands carries a greater Roads Open to All Vehicles responsibility than operating that vehicle in a city or other Trails Open to All Vehicles These roads are open only to motor vehicles licensed under developed setting. Not only must you know and follow all State law for general operation on all public roads within the 41°7'30"N T W r int o Trails Open to Vehicles 50" or Less in Width er u Peko C t Guide to Area C Willow Wells applicable traffic laws, you need to show concern for the State. O re A Pk ek R59E R60E C R61E R62E 41°7'30"N L re 93 747 ek Trails Open to Motorcyles Only M I environment as well as other forest users. The misuse of N Welcome W E 753 Roads Open to All Vehicles: i l C l A C o N lo w motor vehicles can lead to the temporary or permanent Seasonal Designation (See Table) Y C v O O er N A L r e C 35 N 36 R N v closure of any designated road, trail, or area.
    [Show full text]