DOCSLIB.ORG

Tribe-Of-Hackers-Cybersecurity-Advice-From-The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tribe-Of-Hackers-Cybersecurity-Advice-From-The TRIBE OF HACKERS TRIBE OF HACKERS Cybersecurity Advice from the Best Hackers in the World Marcus J. Carey & Jennifer Jin Cover illustration: Creation © Allriot.com Cover and book design: www.adamhaystudio.com Copyright © 2019 by Marcus J. Carey. All rights reserved. Published by Threatcare Press in Austin, Texas. No part of this publication may be copied, reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical (including photocopying, electronic, recording, or otherwise) without the prior permission in writing from the publisher. Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: The views and opinions expressed in this book are of the contributors themselves and do not necessarily reflect the views of the co-authors, Threatcare, or its employees. While the authors have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a professional where appropriate. This work is sold with the understanding that neither the authors nor the publisher are held responsible for the results accrued from the advice in this book. Neither the publisher nor the authors shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages. ISBN: 978-1-79346-418-7 Printed in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 First Edition www.tribeofhackers.com Introduction 1 01 Marcus J. Carey 6 02 Ian Anderson 12 03 Andrew Bagrin 18 04 Zate Berg 24 05 Cheryl Biswas 28 06 Keirsten Brager 32 07 Evan Booth 38 08 Kyle Bubp 42 09 Lesley Carhart 48 10 Lee Carsten 54 11 Whitney Champion 60 12 Ming Chow 66 13 Jim Christy 72 14 Ian Coldwater 78 Contents 15 Dan Cornell 84 16 Kim Crawley 90 17 Emily Crose 96 18 Daniel Crowley 100 19 Winnona DeSombre 104 20 Ryan Dewhurst 110 21 Deidre Diamond 114 22 Ben Donnelly 118 23 Kimber Dowsett 130 24 Ronald Eddings 136 25 Justin Elze 140 26 Robert Graham 144 27 Claudio Guarnieri 150 28 Ron Gula 154 29 Jennifer Havermann 158 30 Teuta Hyseni 162 31 Terence Jackson 168 32 Ken Johnson 172 33 David Kennedy 178 34 Michelle Klinger 186 35 Marina Krotofil 192 36 Sami Laiho 200 37 Robert M. Lee 204 38 Kelly Lum 208 39 Tracy Z. Maleeff 212 40 Andy Malone 218 41 Jeffrey Man 224 42 Jim Manico 232 43 Kylie Martonik 236 44 Christina Morillo 240 45 Kent Nabors 244 46 Wendy Nather 252 47 Charles Nwatu 258 48 Davi Ottenheimer 264 49 Brandon Perry 274 50 Bruce Potter 280 51 Edward Prevost 284 52 Steve Ragan 288 53 Stephen A. Ridley 292 54 Tony Robinson 300 55 David Rook 306 56 Guillaume Ross 314 57 Brad Schaufenbuel 320 58 Chinyere Schwartz 326 59 Khalil Sehnaoui 330 60 Astha Singhal 338 61 Dug Song 342 62 Jayson E. Street 352 63 Ben Ten 358 Contents 64 Dan Tentler 362 65 Ben Tomhave 368 66 Robert "TProphet" Walker 374 67 Georgia Weidman 380 68 Jake Williams 384 69 Robert Willis 390 70 Robin Wood 394 Final Thoughts 399 Acknowledgments 400 Bibliography 401 Tribe of Hackers Introduction My mind is in a very peaceful and reflective mood. I’m nearing the end of my first time away from work in at least three years, most of which has been a blur as I founded my own cybersecurity firm. I’ve learned a lot about venture capital, investors, and mentors—as well as what it takes to build a company from just an idea. It’s been an amazing journey. My reputation as a white hat hacker gave me the credibility to get this far, and we’re just getting started. I believe in giving as I go. In other words, instead of waiting until I “make it” to give back to others, I have been trying to mentor everyone I come across along the way. I have always been the type to want to help others, so I mean it when I say you’re welcome to email or meet me for guidance about anything. I will always try my best to help. Over the last year, I’ve listened to hundreds of hours of audiobooks while going to and from work and while walking the dogs. One of the books that really impressed me was Tribe of Mentors by Timothy Ferriss, and it stands as the inspiration for this book’s concept. I highly recommend this thought-provoking read on life and business, especially if you’re a fan of self-help books or entrepreneurship. 1 Tribe of Hackers In his book, Ferriss asked famous people from his impressive network eleven questions, and then the magic just happens. For me, this immediately sparked the idea that there should be a cybersecurity version of the book. So, I compiled the most common questions people ask me about cybersecurity and then narrowed it down to the list you are about to see. In total, I ended up with 14 questions. The questions initially start with views of cybersecurity at-large and then become more personal. I noticed that when I have conversations at conferences, this is the normal flow. We call these types of conversations “hallway-con,” because some of the best learning happens between the scheduled talks and events. After compiling the questions, I started reaching out to my network of friends and colleagues in the industry and asked them to be a part of this book. I was humbled by the response. In total, we ended up with 70 inspiring and thought-provoking interviews with notable hackers— including such luminaries as Lesley Carhart, David Kennedy, and Bruce Potter. But before we launch into the interviews, let’s take a quick look at the questions: 1. If there is one myth that you could debunk in cybersecurity, what would it be? 2. What is one of the biggest bang-for-the-buck actions that an organization can take to improve their cybersecurity posture? 3. How is it that cybersecurity spending is increasing but breaches are still happening? 2 Tribe of Hackers 4. Do you need a college degree or certification to be a cybersecurity professional? 5. How did you get started in the cybersecurity field, and what advice would you give to a beginner pursuing a career in cybersecurity? 6. What is your specialty in cybersecurity? How can others gain expertise in your specialty? 7. What is your advice for career success when it comes to getting hired, climbing the corporate ladder, or starting a company in cybersecurity? 8. What qualities do you believe all highly successful cybersecurity professionals share? 9. What is the best book or movie that can be used to illustrate cybersecurity challenges? 10. What is your favorite hacker movie? 11. What are your favorite books for motivation, personal development, or enjoyment? 12. What is some practical cybersecurity advice you give to people at home in the age of social media and the Internet of Things? 13. What is a life hack that you’d like to share? 14. What is the biggest mistake you’ve ever made, and how did you recover from it? 3 Tribe of Hackers Before we wrap up, a quick note about the book: We edited every interview to improve flow and readability, and in some cases, this meant abbreviating answers or deleting non-responses. You’ll also notice that we’ve included contact information at the end of each bio indicating where you can find each hacker on the web, as well as on social media. We’re an engaged and tight-knit group, and we hope you’ll join us. Creating this book has been an amazing journey, and I hope the answers to these questions help guide you along your path. Marcus J. Carey CEO Threatcare January 1, 2018 4 Tribe of Hackers Marcus J. Carey Marcus J. Carey is the founder and CEO of Threatcare. He describes himself as a hacker who helps people not suck at cybersecurity. He started his technology voyage in U.S. Navy Cryptology and later went on to refine his knowledge while working at the National Security Agency (NSA). Twitter: @marcusjcarey Website: www.threatcare.com If there is one myth that you could debunk in cybersecurity, what would it be? The biggest myth that I hear is how attackers are always changing up their tactics. While it is true that new exploits come out over time, the initial exploit is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to attacker movement on a system or network. Even if an organization is compromised by a zero-day attack, the lateral 01 movement, registry manipulation, network communications, and so on will be very apparent to a mature cybersecurity practitioner and program. So, their tactics don’t really change a lot. What is one of the biggest bang-for-the-buck actions that an organization can take to improve their cybersecurity posture? The easiest thing an organization can do to prevent massive compromise is to limit administrative accounts on systems. In the military, we obeyed the “least privilege principle” when it came to information access. Organizations should do the same when it comes to their own administrative access. If attackers are able to compromise a user with administrative credentials, it’s essentially game over; they now have all the keys to the castle.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kinetic Tactics of Competing Powers Over the Coming Decade
    A Virtual Think Tank (ViTTa®) Report September 2019 Kinetic and Non- Kinetic Tactics of Competing Powers Over the Coming Decade Deeper Analyses Clarifying Insights Better Decisions NSIteam.com Produced in support of the Strategic Multilayer Assessment (SMA) Office (Joint Staff, J39) Kinetic and Non-Kinetic Tactics of Competing Powers Over the Coming Decade Author George Popp Editors Sarah Canna and George Popp Please direct inquiries to George Popp at [email protected] What is ViTTa? NSI’s Virtual Think Tank (ViTTa) provides rapid response to critical information needs by pulsing a global network of subject matter experts (SMEs) to generate a wide range of expert insight. For the Strategic Multilayer Assessment (SMA) Future of Global Competition and Conflict project, ViTTa was used to address 12 key questions provided by the project’s Joint Staff sponsors. The ViTTa team received written response submissions from 65 subject matter experts from academia, government, military, and industry. This report consists of: 1. A summary overview of the expert contributor response to the ViTTa question of focus. 2. The full corpus of expert contributor responses received for the ViTTa question of focus. 3. Biographies of expert contributors. _________________________________ Cover image: https://ak9.picdn.net/shutterstock/videos/12961529/thumb/1.jpg RESEARCH ▪ INNOVATIONNSI ▪ EXCELLENCE II Kinetic and Non-Kinetic Tactics of Competing Powers Over the Coming Decade Table of Contents What is ViTTa? ...................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from Others for Future U.S. Army Operations in and Through the Information Environment CASE STUDIES
    C O R P O R A T I O N Lessons from Others for Future U.S. Army Operations in and Through the Information Environment CASE STUDIES Christopher Paul, Colin P. Clarke, Michael Schwille, Jakub P. Hlávka, Michael A. Brown, Steven S. Davenport, Isaac R. Porche III, Joel Harding For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR1925z2 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-9997-6 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2018 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover photos (clockwise from top left): Giorgio Montersino via Flickr (CC BY-SA 2.0); U.S. Air Force photo by Airman 1st Class Adawn Kelsey; U.S. Air Force photo by Tech Sgt John Gordinier; U.S. Air National Guard photo by Master Sgt Andrew J. Moseley; Russian Ministry of Defence (CC BY 4.0); North Korean national media Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous.
    [Show full text]
  • Artificial Intelligence
    November-December 2019 Advanced Public Forum Brief 2 Resolved: The benefits of the United States federal government’s use of offensive cyber operations outweigh the harms. This topic brief was written by Jesse Meyer. Jesse is a diamond coach, recipient of the Donald Crabtree Service Award, the state of Iowa’s 2015 Coach of the Year, and board member of the Iowa Forensics League. He is currently an assistant coach at Iowa City West High School. He can be reached at [email protected]. National Speech & Debate Association • Public Forum Debate: NOVEMBER-DECEMBER 2019 ADVANCED BRIEF November-December 2019 Advanced Public Forum Brief 3 November-December 2019 Advanced Public Forum Brief Table of Contents Resolved: The benefits of the United States federal government’s use of offensive cyber operations outweigh the harms. ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Framework and Definitions ....................................................................................................................... 9 Other Countries ........................................................................................................................................... 14 China .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • WEAPONS of MASS DISTRACTION: Foreign State-Sponsored Disinformation in the Digital Age
    WEAPONS OF MASS DISTRACTION: Foreign State-Sponsored Disinformation in the Digital Age MARCH 2019 PARK ADVISORS | Weapons of Mass Distraction: Foreign State-Sponsored Disinformation in the Digital Age Authored by Christina Nemr and William Gangware Acknowledgements The authors are grateful to the following subject matter experts who provided input on early drafts of select excerpts: Dr. Drew Conway, Dr. Arie Kruglanski, Sean Murphy, Dr. Alina Polyakova, and Katerina Sedova. The authors also appreciate the contributions to this paper by Andrew Rothgaber and Brendan O’Donoghue of Park Advisors, as well as the editorial assistance provided by Rhonda Shore and Ryan Jacobs. This report was produced with support from the US Department of State’s Global Engagement Center. Any views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the US State Department, Park Advisors, or its subject matter expert consultants. Any errors contained in this report are the authors’ alone. PARK ADVISORS | Weapons of Mass Distraction: Foreign State-Sponsored Disinformation in the Digital Age 0. Table of Contents 01 Introduction and contextual analysis 04 How do we define disinformation? 06 What psychological factors drive vulnerabilities to disinformation and propaganda? 14 A look at foreign state-sponsored disinformation and propaganda 26 Platform-specific challenges and efforts to counter disinformation 39 Knowledge gaps and future technology challenges PARK ADVISORS | Weapons of Mass Distraction: Foreign State-Sponsored Disinformation in the Digital Age 1 Introduction and 1. contextual analysis On July 12, 2014, viewers of Russia’s main state-run television station, Channel One, were shown a horrific story.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Interference: an Evolving Strategic Situation
    Election Interference: An Evolving Strategic Situation Andrew Rose POLS 290-001W Political Science Capstone Fall 2020 Semester Introduction While democratic government is a commonplace geopolitical model today, there are still some states dedicated to the erosion of democratic values. Perhaps there is no pillar more integral to a functioning democracy than free elections. One of the best ways to compromise that foundation is through election interference. This practice, which can involve cyber-attacks on a variety of targets, the dispersal of ‘fake news’ and the co-option of stateside actors, has recently become a topic of much discussion. It is, in fact, too far ranging a concept to tackle in one place. The many disparate appearances which interference takes on, as well as its many potential trajectories complicate any study of the matter. A completely comprehensive survey will not be undertaken here. Firstly, what exactly election interference is must be defined. The exactness is what makes this a demanding task. When it is accomplished, it should be clear what harm interference can really do. The next point of exploration is one that becomes increasingly complex depending upon one’s worldview and political affiliation: what can be done about it? As a destabilizing tool, election interference has been deployed with increasing dexterity by numerous international actors. While most modern states have offensive and defensive cyber tools in their arsenals, there are only a select handful which use cyber meddling to interfere in elections and other democratic processes. China, North Korea and Iran all engage in cyber meddling and election interference, although with sometimes diverging methods and disparate goals in mind.
    [Show full text]
  • Authoritarian Influence Operations in East Asia: Chinese Foreign Interference Through Cyberwarfare, Influence Operations, and Coercion
    AUTHORITARIAN INFLUENCE OPERATIONS IN EAST ASIA: CHINESE FOREIGN INTERFERENCE THROUGH CYBERWARFARE, INFLUENCE OPERATIONS, AND COERCION Adam Foster Recently, China has increased its foreign political interference operations and developed cyber-strategies to hedge against threats from both state and individual actors. Since 2016, IR scholars have recognized Russian attempts at foreign interference in advanced democracies and US allies. Investigation as to how the Chinese government has devel- oped and deployed foreign interference tactics, however, have largely gone unnoticed. Through the examination of case-studies in Chinese cyberwarfare, influence operations in Australia, and economic and diplomatic coercion in Taiwan, this paper aims to determine how the CCP uses foreign interference tactics to address its regime security concerns. This paper will argue that, as a safeguard against threats to its regime security, China has increasingly deployed interference in domestic economies and politics as part of its statecraft. Cyberwarfare efforts to promote pro-PRC business leaders and elected officials in Australia and to influence Taiwan’s media have had some success in promoting pro- PRC views. However, overt electoral interference by the CCP almost inevitably leads to negative media coverage and backlash against the PRC. INTRODUCTION As China asserts itself as a global superpower, the Chinese Communist Party endeav- ors to pursue legitimation of its rule via reinstating the historical norm of Chinese political, economic, and cultural dominance in East Asia. Whereas prior to the Xi Jinping era, the CCP was content to live within an international system centered around US hegemony, its surge in both economic and political capital has encouraged the CCP to increase foreign political interference operations and develop cyber-op- erations strategies to hedge against risk from both state and individual actors that the CCP perceives as a threat to regime security.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of China's Hacking Culture: Defining Chinese Hackers
    California State University, San Bernardino CSUSB ScholarWorks Electronic Theses, Projects, and Dissertations Office of aduateGr Studies 6-2016 The Rise of China's Hacking Culture: Defining Chinese Hackers William Howlett IV California State University - San Bernardino Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd Part of the Asian Studies Commons, Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons, International Relations Commons, Politics and Social Change Commons, and the Science and Technology Studies Commons Recommended Citation Howlett, William IV, "The Rise of China's Hacking Culture: Defining Chinese Hackers" (2016). Electronic Theses, Projects, and Dissertations. 383. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd/383 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Office of aduateGr Studies at CSUSB ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses, Projects, and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of CSUSB ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE RISE OF CHINA’S HACKING CULTURE DEFINING CHINESE HACKERS A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in Social Sciences and Globalization by William Sedgwick Howlett June 2016 THE RISE OF CHINA’S HACKING CULTURE DEFINING CHINESE HACKERS A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino by William Sedgwick Howlett June 2016 Approved by: Cherstin Lyon, Committee Chair, Social Sciences and Globalization Jeremy Murray, Committee Member, History Jose Munoz, Committee Member, Sociology © 2016 William Sedgwick Howlett ABSTRACT China has been home to some of the most prominent hackers and hacker groups of the global community throughout the last decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Penggunaan Kapabilitas Cyberwarfare Tiongkok Dalam
    IR - PERPUSTAKAAN UNIVERSITAS AIRLANGGA DAFTAR PUSTAKA Artikel Jurnal dan Jurnal Elektronik Breen, M., & Geltzer, J. A. (2011). Asymmetric strategies as strategies of the strong. Parameters, 41(1), 41. Burk, R. A., & Kallberg, J. (2016). Bring on the Cyber Attacks–The increased predatory power of the restrained red queen in a nation-state cyber conflict. The Cyber Defense Review, 1(2), 61-72. Eun, Y. S., & Aßmann, J. S. (2016). Cyberwar: Taking stock of security and warfare in the digital age. International Studies Perspectives, 17(3), 343-360. Gootman, S. (2016). OPM hack: The most dangerous threat to the federal government today. Journal of Applied Security Research, 11(4), 517-525. Haizler, O. (2017). The United States’ Cyber Warfare History: Implications on Modern Cyber Operational Structures and Policymaking. Cyber, Intelligence, and Security, 1(1), 31-45. Heginbotham, E. (2015). The US-China military scorecard: Forces, geography, and the evolving balance of power, 1996–2017. Rand Corporation. Hjortdal, M. (2011). China’s use of cyber warfare: Espionage meets strategic deterrence. Journal of Strategic Security, 4(2), 1-24. Iasiello, E., 2014., Is cyber deterrence an illusory course of action?. Journal of Strategic Security, 7(1), 54-67 SKRIPSI PENGGUNAAN KAPABILITAS CYBERWARFARE TIONGKOK … PRADANA ADI PRASETYO IR - PERPUSTAKAAN UNIVERSITAS AIRLANGGA Krekel, B. (2009). Capability of the People's Republic of China to conduct cyber warfare and computer network exploitation. NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP MCLEAN VA. Lewis, J. A., & Hansen, S. (2014). China's cyberpower: International and domestic priorities. Australian Strategic Policy Institute Liff, A. P. (2012). Cyberwar: a new ‘absolute weapon’? The proliferation of cyberwarfare capabilities and interstate war.
    [Show full text]
  • A Temperate Alternative to Cyber Insecurity
    Authorized Investigation: A Temperate Alternative to Cyber Insecurity Casey M. Bruner* “Wage war honorably. You may be obliged to wage war but not to use poison arrows.”1 -Baltasar Gracián I. INTRODUCTION In 2011, “Operation Shady RAT” became universally known as one of the most widespread and pervasive cyber espionage campaigns ever discovered.2 The security breach, which persisted over a five-year period, infected more than seventy organizations worldwide including: federal and state government entities, high-tech and communications businesses, thirteen different national defense contractors, and the International Olympic Committee, among others.3 The Operation Shady RAT vulner- ability promulgated the way most computer viruses do: through an email and an attachment.4 An employee of one of the infected defense contrac- tors received an email with an Excel file attached.5 The file contained a * Casey Bruner is a J.D. Candidate at Seattle University School of Law. He previously served as Project Manager for the National Bureau of Asian Research (NBR) and for the Commission on the Theft of American Intellectual Property (IP Commission). The views, opinions, and policy recom- mendations contained in this paper are his alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of NBR, the IP Commission, or any other organization. 1. BALTASAR GRACIÁN, THE ART OF WORLDLY WISDOM 67 (Joseph Jacobs trans., Dover Publications 2005) (1653). 2. See DMITRI ALPEROVITCH, MCAFEE, REVEALED: OPERATIONS SHADY RAT (2011), http://www.mcafee.com/us/resources/white-papers/wp-operation-shady-rat.pdf; see also WILLIAM C. HANNAS ET AL., CHINESE INDUSTRIAL ESPIONAGE: TECHNOLOGY ACQUISITION AND MILITARY MODERNIZATION 220 (2013) (stating that some experts believe that the “Shady RAT” vulnerability originated in China).
    [Show full text]
  • Cyber Threats and Nuclear Weapons New Questions for Command and Control, Security and Strategy
    Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies Occasional Paper Cyber Threats and Nuclear Weapons New Questions for Command and Control, Security and Strategy Andrew Futter Cyber Threats and Nuclear Weapons New Questions for Command and Control, Security and Strategy Andrew Futter RUSI Occasional Paper, July 2016 Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies ii Cyber Threats and Nuclear Weapons Over 180 years of independent defence and security thinking The Royal United Services Institute is the UK’s leading independent think-tank on international defence and security. Its mission is to be an analytical, research-led global forum for informing, influencing and enhancing public debate on a safer and more stable world. Since its foundation in 1831, RUSI has relied on its members to support its activities, sustaining its political independence for over 180 years. London | Brussels | Nairobi | Doha | Tokyo | Washington, DC The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s), and do not reflect the views of RUSI or any other institution. Published in 2016 by the Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No-Derivatives 4.0 International Licence. For more information, see <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/>. RUSI Occasional Paper, July 2016. ISSN 2397-0286 (Online). Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies Whitehall London SW1A 2ET United Kingdom +44 (0)20 7747 2600 www.rusi.org RUSI is a registered charity (No. 210639) Contents Acknowledgements v Introduction: Hacking the Bomb 1 I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Disinformation Age
    Steven Livingston W. LanceW. Bennett EDITED BY EDITED BY Downloaded from terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/1F4751119C7C4693E514C249E0F0F997THE DISINFORMATION AGE https://www.cambridge.org/core Politics, and Technology, Disruptive Communication in the United States the United in https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms . IP address: 170.106.202.126 . , on 27 Sep 2021 at 12:34:36 , subject to the Cambridge Core Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.202.126, on 27 Sep 2021 at 12:34:36, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/1F4751119C7C4693E514C249E0F0F997 The Disinformation Age The intentional spread of falsehoods – and attendant attacks on minorities, press freedoms, and the rule of law – challenge the basic norms and values upon which institutional legitimacy and political stability depend. How did we get here? The Disinformation Age assembles a remarkable group of historians, political scientists, and communication scholars to examine the historical and political origins of the post-fact information era, focusing on the United States but with lessons for other democracies. Bennett and Livingston frame the book by examining decades-long efforts by political and business interests to undermine authoritative institutions, including parties, elections, public agencies, science, independent journalism, and civil society groups. The other distinguished scholars explore the historical origins and workings of disinformation, along with policy challenges and the role of the legacy press in improving public communication. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core. W. Lance Bennett is Professor of Political Science and Ruddick C.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 29 Cyber Attacks by Terrorists and Other Malevolent Actors
    Chapter 29 Cyber Attacks by Terrorists and other Malevolent Actors: Prevention and Preparedness With Three Case Studies on Estonia, Singapore, and the United States Shashi Jayakumar The field of cyberterrorism has existed for as a long as it has been possible to interdict or compromise computer systems. While contributions of scholars, researchers, and practitioners have enriched discussions, there are longstanding and unresolved issues of definition which can give rise to confusion. Does cyberterrorism mean attacks only by individuals groups that fall within widely accepted definitions of “terrorist” or “terrorist organizations?” To what degree does the aim or intention of the malicious actor matter? For the purposes of the present volume, this study (without sidestepping these questions) examines attacks against computer infrastructure and Critical Information Infrastructure (CII) by all actors with capability, and not just groups such as Al-Qaeda or ISIS. As the author notes and establishes early in his discussion, this is necessary given that while conventional terrorist groups might have intent, they have not to date acquired the capability to carry out a genuinely destructive cyber-attack of the type that might lead to major loss of life or infrastructural damage. It is (for the most part) states which have this capability. Cyber prevention and preparedness covers a wide range. This three-part chapter includes technical aspects of cyber protection, systems (and people) resilience, risk mitigation, as well as nurturing talent within
    [Show full text]