DOCSLIB.ORG

Rhino Death Record in Chitwan National Park

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Rhino Death Record in Chitwan National Park - Deepak Acharya [email protected] Year : 1998 A.D. Date Remarks S.N Death Cause Place Sex Age Attack by Male 1 05 Jan.98 Rhino South of Icharni Post M/baby Unknown Mid area of Khorsor Range 2 09 Jan.98 Being Old post Jungle Male Old Drowned in North of Dumariya Post 3 10 Jan.98 marshy land CNP Female Old 4 05 Feb.98 Paralysis 1 km. east of Kujauli post Female Unknown 1 km south of Sukhebhar Horn Not 5 07 Feb.98 Fell into pit post Male Unknown found. Poachers took Shoot by 500m. south of away 6 09 Feb.98 poacher Khagendramalli Male Unknown horn. Near Tiger tops Tented 7 17 Feb.98 Rhinos Fighting Camp Female Unknown Horn was 06 not 8 Mar.98 Killed by Tiger At Sauraha area M/baby 1.5year. grown. Horn was 15 Killed by other not 9 Mar.98 Rhino Bagmara Community Forest F/baby 3 week grown. 1.5km far of Chitwan Horn not 10 06 Apr.98 Found dead Jungle lodge Male Unknown found. At Buffer Zoneer zone area 11 30 Jun.98 Being Old near Amaltari Male Old 12 4-Jul-98 Naturally At Bhimle post Jungle Mature 13 8-Aug-98 Fighting Bankatta post area Male Mature Gandak Canal,Nepal India 14 21Aug.98 Swept by flood Border M/baby Unknown BufferZone area at 15 22Aug.98 Unknown Laukhani,Kawasoti Male Unknown 16 26Aug.98 Attack by rhino Bagmara post area baby Unknown 17 13Sep.98 Being Old Near Bankatta post Male Old Drowned in 18 02 Oct.98 marsh 2 km.west of Bagmara post Male 40 Year Buffer Zone area at 19 04 Oct.98 Naturally Tangrikhola, Pithauli Male Unknown Drowned in Near Binaykhola, Bagwan 20 19 Oct.98 marsh post Female Unknown Fighting each 21 11Nov.98 other 1km.east of Kujauli post Female Unknown Found dead. Killed before 6- 7 22 11Nov.98 Poaching Near Bagban post Unknown months. Poachers took away the 23 14Nov.98 Fell into pit 1.5km east of Amrite post Male Unknown Horn. 15- 24 18Nov.98 Fighting Near Bhawanipur post area Male 16Years. Amaltari, at the confluence of Narayani river & 25 22Nov.98 Being Old Bimkhola Female Unknown Kasara (headquarter), Small 26 19Dec.98 Morbidity while rearing. baby 2.5 mon. baby. •Total Rhino death in 1998= 26, Natural= 22 Poaching = 4 Year : 1999 A.D. S.N. Date Death Cause Place Sex Age Remarks 1 04 Jan.99 Unknown South of Sauraha near M/baby Not bridges no 2. Known 2 06 Jan.99 Fighting Reu river bank, near Male Old Bankatta post. 3 11 Jan.99 Fighting Aghyauli Community Male 10 Forest Years 4 26 Jan.99 Drowned in Confluence of Rapti & Unknown Not marsh. Narayani Rivers,Lamichaur Known area,Kali Jungle. 5 03 Hanging on Kasara,Chippleghat in Rapti F/baby 3 Feb.99 gabion wire river. Months 6 12 Fighting 5 km.west of Male Not Feb.99 Khagendramalli, Simalgairi known ghol, 7 15 Fighting Khagendramalli area Male Not Feb.99 known 8 20 Naturally Lamital, Ghadgain area Male Old Feb.99 9 20 Naturally Ratokhola bagar, north- Male 35-40 Feb.99 east of Amrite post. Years 10 14 Apr.99 Naturally Across Bhulaikhola, Bhimle Female 15-16 post area. Years 11 22 Apr.99 Poaching Pideni ghat area, north of Unknown Not Horn not Amrite post. known found. 12 19 May Naturally On the Island, 1 km. north- Male 25 99 west of Khagendramalli. Years 13 21 Jul.99 Electric shock Mahendra Chaudhari's Female Mature (might be) Field, Ratnanagar Buffer Zone area. 14 29 Jul.99 Naturally Buffer Zone area, Female Old Meghauli-9, Hariyali Community Forest. 15 8 Aug.99 killed using Bodreni Chaur at Sauraha. Male 4-5 spear Years 16 26 Naturally Laugain, Pithauli in Male Old Aug.99 Nawalparasi District. 17 13 Fighting with Dhungre kholabagar at Female Old Sep.99 Rhino Sauraha. 18 15 killed by Simalghari Ghol at Unknown Not Horn not Sep.99 poachers Khagendramalli. Known found. 19 22 Poisoning Barandabhar jungle, Buffer Female 25-30 Sep.99 Zone area. Years 20 23 Killed by Beeshajari lake, Unknown 20-25 Horn not Sep.99 poachers Barandabhar. Years found. 21 24 Paddy field, at Magarkot, Female Not Sep.99 Electric shock Kawasoti, Nawalparasi. known 22 7 Oct.99 Naturally Bairiya, near Icharni post. Female 35 Years 23 12 Naturally Mid jungle area of Male 7-8 Nov.99 Lamichaur. Years 24 19 Morbidity Kumroj community forest, Female Not Nov.99 Buffer Zone area. known 25 16 Naturally Mardikhola near Laukhani Female 38 Dec.99 gateway. Years 26 18 Naturally Dibya Buffer zone, Female 3 Years Dec.99 community Forest, Nawalparasi 27 19 Killed by C.N.P. Kasara M/baby 3 Week no horn Dec.99 Tiger 28 21 Naturally Belsar, Buffer Zone area Female 37 Dec.99 Patihani-8. Years 29 31 Shoot by Chisapani Ghol at Buffer Male Not Horn was Dec.99 Poachers Zone area, Kanthesori known not found. Community Forest. •Total Rhino Death in 1999 = 29, Natural = 23 Poaching = 6 Year : 2000 A.D. S.N. Date Death cause Place Sex Age Remarks 1 06 Jan.00 Naturally Dhungrekhola M/baby 2 Years 2 07 Jan.00 Being old Dhobighat khola at Tiger Female 35-40 tops. Years 3 13 Jan.00 On the grassland near M/baby 7-8 Horn not Dudhaura bridge, Months grown Sauraha. 4 21 Jan.00 Kumarwarti Community Female Not Forest at Laukhani. known 5 25 Jan.00 Morbidity Near Khoriya Muhan post Female 6-7 Baby rhino in CNP. Years 6 25 Jan.00 Drowned in Charchare Ghol near Male 3 Years Baby rhino Marsh Dumariya Post. 7 30 Jan.00 Naturally Khagendramalli Female 5 Years 8 30 Jan.00 Killed by Tiger Sauraha (during M/baby 4 treatment) Months 9 31 Jan.00 Attack by Baghuwa Ghol, Sauraha. Male 4-5 Rhino Years 10 03 Feb.00 Naturally 1 km. east of Bhimle Female 35 post. Years 11 11 Feb.00 Killed by Male Near Debital at Hattimar Male 2.5 Baby rhino rhino khola. Years 12 23 Feb.00 Due to injury Near Khoriya Muhan post. Male 30 Years 13 26 Feb.00 Fell into a pit Naya Belahani Buffer Unknown Not Horn was Zone area. known not found 14 27 Feb.00 Poisoning Bhutaha khola near Female Not Khagendramalli known 15 29 Feb.00 Shoot by Sano harda near Female 8 Years Poachers Khagendramalli 16 07 Mar.00 Poachers' Sanoharda near Female 25 bullet Khagendramalli Years 17 20 Mar.00 Attack by other Sauraha sector M/baby 5 Growing rhino Months horn 18 07 Apr.00 Attack by Male Jayamangala, eastern M/baby 1 Month Horn not rhino Chitwan. grown 19 13 Apr.00 Attack by Male South-east corner of 2.5 rhino Tamor Tal Years 20 17 Apr.00 Poaching Raj Tapu at Meghauli Male Not Poachers known took away the horn 21 29 Apr.00 Poaching Buffer zone forest of Male Not Poachers Tribeni known took away the horn 22 09 May Poaching Community forest at Male 30 Poachers 00 Meghauli. Years took away the horn 23 15 May Poaching Laukhani area, Near Male Not Poachers 00 Ratopani ghol. known took away the horn 24 18 May Naturally Narayani River at Unknown Mature 00 Sikhrauli Ghat. 25 14 Jun.00 Naturally Rapti River at Male 20 Dharmapur, Meghauli. Years 26 25 Jun.00 Fighting Near Temple Tiger Lodge, M/baby 3 Years at Bridge no.1. 27 05 Jul. 00 Shoot by Murdari Ghol at Chitrasen Female 20 Poachers poachers Community forest. Years took away the horn 28 25 Drowned in Bhangaha Ghat near Female 20-25 Aug.00 marsh Bhimle Post. Years 29 29 Not known In Paddy field at Hirapur, Male 25-30 Aug.00 Dibyanagar. Years 30 10 Sep.00 Naturally Badalkhola,Kawasoti Male 40 Years 31 27 Attack by big Near Laukhani post F/baby 2.5 Nov.00 rhino Years 32 16 Dec.00 Attack by other Badhkhola in Kawasoti-1, Male 28-30 rhino Buffer Zone area. Years 33 19 Dec.00 Not known Near Amaltari area. Unknown Not known 34 19 Dec.00 Naturally 3 km east of Bagmara M/baby 3-4 post. Years •Total Rhino Death in 2000 = 34 Natural = 27 Poaching = 7 Year : 2001 A.D. S.N. Date Death Cause Place Sex Age Remarks 1 14 Jan.01 Killed by Male Buffer zone forest of Female Matured rhino Kawasoti area 2 15 Jan.01 Fighting Buffer zone area of Male 7 Years Kawasoti 3 15 Jan.01 Fell into a pit Padampur, Chitwan Female 48 Years 4 18 Jan.01 Naturally Sauraha sector, Male Not Jayamangala ghol. known 5 12 Shoot by Sirke Tapu of Laukhani Male Mature Feb.01 poachers area 6 15 Shoot by Infront of Gainda hotel, Female 10-11 Mar.01 poachers Sauraha. Years 7 16 Apr.01 Shoot by Laukhuri village, Male 18-20 poachers Bagmara area. Years 8 11 Jun.01 Killed by Tiger Kolhuwa, Bagmara tandi M/baby Not horn not known grown 9 12 Jun.01 Shoot by Old tented camp of Tiger Female 20 Poachers poachers tops Years took away the horn 10 8 Jul.01 Shoot by North of Devi Tal Not Poachers poachers unidentified known took away the horn 11 18 Jul.01 Morbidity Kasara in captivity M/baby 2 Months 12 27 Jul.01 Unknown Andrauli, Buffer Zone Female Not area of Meghauli.
Recommended publications
  • Monthly District Report

    Monthly District Report

    District Report Housing Recovery and Reconstruction Platform, Nepal Housing Recovery and Reconstruction Platform Monthly District Report Makwanpur, Chitwan, Nawalpur, Parasi 14 June - 14 July 2019 Summary of events during this period Districts Name of activity/event Event date Location (District, Contact Person Reference Municipality) Document Makwanpur District Facilitation and 18th June DCC Hall, [email protected] Meeting Coordination Meeting 2019 Makwanpur, Minute Hetauda Sub- click here.. Metropolitan Update Palika Profile data of 7th June 2019 [email protected] Palika Makwanpur Profile Data Chitwan District Coordination Meeting 26th June Chitwan GMaLi [email protected] Meeting 2019 Hall Minute click here... Organized interaction program 24th June, [email protected] in GMALI DLPIU and Building 2019 DLPIU at Chitwan Organized Technical 26th june, Kalika [email protected] Report Coordination Meeting in Plika 2019 Municipality Available level at Kalika Municipality Office Below Nawalpur Organized Technical 27th June Hupsekot Rural [email protected] Report Coordination Meeting in ward 2019 Municipality Available level at Hupsekot Rural Office Below Municipality Field visit Carry out 27th June, Devchuli 2019 Municipality Parasi Update Palika Profile data of 12th June [email protected] Palika Nawalpur 2019 Profile Data Upcoming Events & Meetings Name of activity/event Date, Time, and Organizer Contact Person Location (District, Municipality) District Facilitation and Tentative 19th July, DCC/GMaLI/HRRP [email protected] Coordination Meeting 2019; DCC Hall, Hetauda, Makwanpur Technical Coordination Meeting 24th July to 26th July, Joint Monitoring Team [email protected] in Ward level and Joint Field 2019 Bakaiya Rural Monitoring Visit Municipality, Participants: M&E Specialist, Makwanpur Gadhi DSE, HRRP team, Ward and Hetauda Sub- representatives, local Metropolitan technicians and Beneficiaries.
  • Conservation and the Impact of Relocation on the Tharus of Chitwan, Nepal Joanne Mclean Charles Sturt University (Australia)

    Conservation and the Impact of Relocation on the Tharus of Chitwan, Nepal Joanne Mclean Charles Sturt University (Australia)

    HIMALAYA, the Journal of the Association for Nepal and Himalayan Studies Volume 19 Number 2 Himalayan Research Bulletin; Special Article 8 Topic: The Tharu 1999 Conservation and the Impact of Relocation on the Tharus of Chitwan, Nepal Joanne McLean Charles Sturt University (Australia) Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/himalaya Recommended Citation McLean, Joanne (1999) "Conservation and the Impact of Relocation on the Tharus of Chitwan, Nepal," HIMALAYA, the Journal of the Association for Nepal and Himalayan Studies: Vol. 19 : No. 2 , Article 8. Available at: http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/himalaya/vol19/iss2/8 This Research Article is brought to you for free and open access by the DigitalCommons@Macalester College at DigitalCommons@Macalester College. It has been accepted for inclusion in HIMALAYA, the Journal of the Association for Nepal and Himalayan Studies by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Macalester College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Conservation and the linpact of Relocation on the Tharus of Chitwan, Nepal Joanne McLean Charles Sturt University (Australia) Since the establishment of the first national park in the United States in the nineteenth century, indig­ enous peoples have been forced to move from regions designated as parks. Some of these people have been relocated to other areas by the government, more often they have been told to leave the area and are given no alternatives (Clay, 1985:2). Introduction (Guneratne 1994; Skar 1999). The Thant are often de­ scribed as one people. However, many subgroups exist: The relocation of indigenous people from national Kochjla Tharu in the eastern Tarai, Chitwaniya and Desauri parks has become standard practice in developing coun­ in the central Tarai, and Kathariya, Dangaura and Rana tries with little regard for the impacts it imposes on a Tharu in the western Tarai (Meyer & Deuel, 1999).
  • Download 1.17 MB

    Download 1.17 MB

    Social Monitoring Report Quarterly Report May 2020 Project Number: 48337-002 Nepal: South Asia Subregional Economic Cooperation Roads Improvement Project Prepared by the Department of Roads for the Ministry of Finance and the Asian Development Bank. This social monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Government of Nepal Ministry of Physical Infrastructure and Transport DEPARTMENT OF ROADS Project Directorate (ADB) Bishalnagar, Kathmandu, Nepal CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION OF SASEC ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (SRIP) (ADB Loan No.: 3478-NEP) QUARTERLY REPORT NO. 7 (SOCIAL MONITORING) SASEC Roads Improvement Project Package 1: EWH- NarayanghatButwal Road, Section I (64.425 Km) Package 2: EWH- NarayanghatButwal Road, Section II (48.535 Km) Package 3:Bhairahawa –Lumbini- Taulihawa Road, (41.130 Km) (January - March) 2020 Submitted by M/S Korea Engineering Consultants Ltd. Corp.-MEH Consultant (P) Ltd., Kyong Dong Engineering Co. Ltd. JV In association with MULTI – Disciplinary Consultants (P) Ltd.&Seoul, Korea.SOIL Test (P) Ltd. QUARTERLY (SOCIAL MONITORING) REPORT NO. 7 January - March 2020 SOCIAL MONITORING REPORT QUARTERLY REPORT NO. 7 (January – March 2020) NEP: Loan No. 3478 SASEC Road Improvement Project (SRIP) Prepared by: Department of Roads, Project Directorate (ADB), for Ministry of Physical Infrastructure & Transport and the Asian Development Bank.
  • Performance Evaluation of Amaltari Bufferzone Community Homestay of Kawasoti Municipality in Nawalpur, Nepal

    Performance Evaluation of Amaltari Bufferzone Community Homestay of Kawasoti Municipality in Nawalpur, Nepal

    IOSR Journal of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) Volume 25, Issue 7, Series 4 (July. 2020) 01-10 e-ISSN: 2279-0837, p-ISSN: 2279-0845. www.iosrjournals.org Performance Evaluation of Amaltari Bufferzone Community Homestay of Kawasoti Municipality in Nawalpur, Nepal Dr. Rajan Binayek Pasa Assistant Professor at Central Department of Rural Development Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu ABSTRACT:This study analyzed performance evaluation of Amaltari Bufferzone Community Homestay (ABCH) of Kawasoti Municipality. This study followed post-positivist paradigm and survey methodology by applying evaluation indicators such as relevancy, efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability. The research issueshave been theorized from social capital, ecotourism, asset based community developmentand sustainability approach on development.The survey result shows that relevancy got highest mean value 3.9922 with std. deviation 0.90575 which is followed by impact mean value 3.7871 with std. deviation 0.78242 and sustainability mean value 3.6325 with std. deviation 0.79901. It signifies that majority of respondents are relatively satisfied with relevancy, impact and sustainability related variables. More so, effectiveness secured least mean value 3.5145 with std. deviation 0.85903 that is followed by efficiency mean value 3.6052 with std. deviation 0.78690. The value its self is not disagreed views of the respondents but from evaluation perspectives it requires more attention. However, ABCH has performed effectively due to the strong social capital, conservation and mobilization fund, good networks of physical assets, as well as quality leaderships that has brought positive impacts in community and social level. Finally, this study has high implications in the sector of improving the lives of people residing around bufferzone through the tourism activities.
  • Strengthening Livelihood Capacities to Disaster Risk Reduction - Compilation of Change Studies, Kathmandu, Nepal, Practical Action

    Strengthening Livelihood Capacities to Disaster Risk Reduction - Compilation of Change Studies, Kathmandu, Nepal, Practical Action

    S T R E N G T H E N I N G L I V E L I H O O D C A P A C I T I E S T O D I S A S T E R R I S K R E D U C T I O N I N N E P A L Compilation of Change Studies Study Team Dinanath Bhandari and Yuwan Malakar Suported By Ghanashyam Bhandari, SAHAMATI Yani Gaha, SAHAMATI Yadu Kandel, SAHAMATI Anil Prajapati, SAHAMATI Anju Adhikari, MADE Nepal Gita Kumal, MADE Nepal Baburam KC, MADE Nepal Reviewers Pieter van Den Ende, Practical Action Gehendra Gurung, Practical Action © Practical Action Nepal Office, 2011 In collaboration with SAHAMATI and MADE Nepal Citation: Practical Action (2011) Strengthening Livelihood Capacities to Disaster Risk Reduction - Compilation of Change Studies, Kathmandu, Nepal, Practical Action ISBN: 978-9937-8135-8-7 No use of this publication may be made for resale or other commercial purpose without prior permission of the copyright holder. 'This material has been funded by UKaid from the Department for International Development, however the views expressed do not necessarily reflect the department's official policies.' C O N T E N T S Foreword ii Why work in disaster risk reduction? iv Acronyms vi Chapter 1. Introduction 1 Chapter 2. Irrigation facilites reduce sensitivity to drought 10 Chapter 3. Electric fencing decreases exposure to wild animals 22 Chapter 4. Vegetables are an additional source of income to improve resilience 29 Chapter 5. Improved bee keeping and its contribution to reducing landslides 36 Chapter 6.
  • Tourism in Nepal: the Models for Assessing Performance of Amaltari Bufferzone Community Homestay in Nawalpur

    Tourism in Nepal: the Models for Assessing Performance of Amaltari Bufferzone Community Homestay in Nawalpur

    NJDRS 51 CDRD DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/njdrs.v17i0.34952 Tourism in Nepal: The Models for Assessing Performance of Amaltari Bufferzone Community Homestay in Nawalpur Rajan Binayek Pasa, PhD Lecturer at Central Department of Rural Development Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu Email for correspondence: [email protected] Abstract This study assesses performance of Amaltari Bufferzone Community Homestay that received best homestay award in 2017. For the survey study, the datacollected from 236 sample respondents were theorized based on social capital, ecotourism, asset-based community development and sustainability approach that are then supported by the empirical findings. An index was developed to describe the overall performance of the homestay by compositing five thematic indexes: relevancy, efficiency, effectiveness, impact, sustainability. The index value 92.65 from the range of minimum 48 and maximum 240 for the overall performance provides the strong quantitative evidence to answer the question “why did Amaltari receive the best award among”. The multiple regression model (R-square value 0.99) for overall performance also proves that independent variables describe the dependent variables by 99 percent. Among the independent variables relevancy and effectiveness indexes are more likely to describe dependent variable- the overall performance index. The evidence shows that Amaltari homestay has performed well due to the technical/financial supports of WWF, proper mobilization/utilization of conservation fund and homestay community fund, strong social capital, and quality leadership that has transforming the livelihoods of Tharu, Bote and Mushar indigeneous people. However, they have some concerns like waste management in bufferzone areas, reviving the cultural organizations for preserving and transmitting culture from generation to generation, minimizing the modernization and demonstrative effects due to the excessive flow of the tourists and upgrading road connectivity.
  • Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal

    Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal

    SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics Acknowledgements The completion of both this and the earlier feasibility report follows extensive consultation with the National Planning Commission, Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), World Food Programme (WFP), UNICEF, World Bank, and New ERA, together with members of the Statistics and Evidence for Policy, Planning and Results (SEPPR) working group from the International Development Partners Group (IDPG) and made up of people from Asian Development Bank (ADB), Department for International Development (DFID), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UNICEF and United States Agency for International Development (USAID), WFP, and the World Bank. WFP, UNICEF and the World Bank commissioned this research. The statistical analysis has been undertaken by Professor Stephen Haslett, Systemetrics Research Associates and Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand and Associate Prof Geoffrey Jones, Dr. Maris Isidro and Alison Sefton of the Institute of Fundamental Sciences - Statistics, Massey University, New Zealand. We gratefully acknowledge the considerable assistance provided at all stages by the Central Bureau of Statistics. Special thanks to Bikash Bista, Rudra Suwal, Dilli Raj Joshi, Devendra Karanjit, Bed Dhakal, Lok Khatri and Pushpa Raj Paudel. See Appendix E for the full list of people consulted. First published: December 2014 Design and processed by: Print Communication, 4241355 ISBN: 978-9937-3000-976 Suggested citation: Haslett, S., Jones, G., Isidro, M., and Sefton, A. (2014) Small Area Estimation of Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal, Central Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commissions Secretariat, World Food Programme, UNICEF and World Bank, Kathmandu, Nepal, December 2014.
  • A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Practical Action's Livelihood-Centred

    A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Practical Action's Livelihood-Centred

    A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Practical Action’s Livelihood-Centred Disaster Risk Reduction Project in Nepal Dr Dirk Willenbockel Institute of Development Studies at the University of Sussex, Brighton, UK Report Commissioned by Practical Action, UK, March 2011 Acknowledgements The author would like to thank Maggie Ibrahim, International Program Coordinator at Practical Action UK, for her lead role in commissioning and overseeing this study and for providing helpful comments on an earlier draft. The help of Dinanath Bhandari at the Practical Action Nepal Office, who responded promptly to all requests for additional information and further clarifications is gratefully acknowledged. Stacey Townsend at the Institute of Development Studies provided competent research assistance and administrative support. Copyright © Practical Action 2011 Author Dirk Willenbockel Institute of Development Studies at the University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RE – UK [email protected] Suggested citation D. Willenbockel (2011) A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Practical Action’s Livelihood-Centred Disaster Risk Reduction Project in Nepal. Brighton: IDS. Abstract This study provides a systematic cost-benefit analysis of a community-based disaster risk management project led by Practical Action in two districts of Nepal over the period 2007 to 2010. Under cautious assumptions about the long-term impacts of the project initiatives, the overall benefit-cost ratio ranges from 1.13 to 1.45, while under moderately optimistic assumptions the estimated benefit- cost ratio is up to 2.04. The internal rate of return of the project is between 22.2 and 26.3 percent. These findings indicate that the livelihood-centred approach to disaster risk reduction adopted in this project has resulted in a significant net contribution to the economic welfare of the target communities and delivered value for money.
  • Kawasoti Updated IEE Small Towns

    Kawasoti Updated IEE Small Towns

    Updated Initial Environmental Examination Project number: 35173-013 July 2015 NEP: Third Small Towns Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Project —Kawasoti (Nawalparasi) Prepared by ITECO Nepal (P) Ltd., SILT Consultants (P) Ltd., and Unique Engineering Consultancy (P) Ltd. for the Government of Nepal and the Asian Development Bank. This revised initial environmental examination report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Government of Nepal Ministry of Urban Development Department of Water Supply and Sewerage Small Towns Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Project (STWSSSP) Project Management Office (PMO) Panipokhari, Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal Enhance Functionality in Small Towns Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Project (STWSSSP) UPDATED INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EXAMINATION REPORT (IEE) For Kawasoti Small Towns Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Project Kawasoti, Nawalparasi Kathmandu, July 2015 Submitted by: Joint Venture in Between ITECO Nepal (P) Ltd. SILT Consultants (P) Ltd. Unique Engineering P. O. Box 2147 P.O. Box 2724 Consultancy (P) Ltd. Ratopul, Gaushala, Kathmandu, Nepal Min Bhawan, Kathmandu,
  • Resettlement Plan: Narayanghat–Butwal Road

    Resettlement Plan: Narayanghat–Butwal Road

    Resettlement Plan July 2016 NEP: SASEC Roads Improvement Project Narayanghat-Butwal Road Prepared by Department of Roads, Ministry of Physical Infrastructure and Transports, Government of Nepal for the Asian Development Bank. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 27 May 2016) Currency unit – Nepalese rupee (NPR) NPR1.00 = $ 0.00931 $1.00 = 107.432 ABBREVIATIONS ADB - Asian Development Bank Aps - Affected Persons BPL - Below Poverty Line CBO - Community Based Organization CBS - Central Bureau of Statistics CDC - Compensation Determination Committee CDO - Chief District Officer CoI - Corridor of Impact DAO - District Administration Office DDC - District Development Committee DLSO - District Land Survey Office DLRO - District Land Revenue Office DoR - Department of Roads CSC - Construction and Supervisi0n Consultant EA - Executing Agency FGD - Focus Group Discussion GDI - Gender Development Index GEU - Geo- Environment Unit GRC - Grievance Redress Committee GoN - Government of Nepal HDI - Human Development Index HPI - Human Poverty Index HHs - Households IA - Implementing Agency INGO - International Nongovernment Organization MoF - Ministry of Finance MoPIT - Ministry of Physical Infrastructure and Transport NGO - Non-governmental Organization PDP(s)- Project Affected Family (Families) PD - Project Director, PID PIU - Project Implementation Unit PPTA - project preparatory Technical Assistance RoW - Right of Way RP - Resettlement Plan R&R - Resettlement and Rehabilitation RS - Resettlement Specialist SPAF - Severely project Affected Family SPS - Safeguard Policy Statement (ADB 2009) Sqm - Square meters TPPF - Transport Project Preparatory Facility VDC - Village Development Committee ZoI - Zone of Influence GLOSSARY Affected Person – Any person including Vulnerable encroachers/squatters, households, business affected by the project through the acquisition of land or other assets or disruption in business irrespective of legal or ownership title.
  • Struggle for Environmental Justice Aug 23.Indd

    Struggle for Environmental Justice Aug 23.Indd

    Chapter Five From Local Resistance to a Movement The restrictions imposed by the Park on daily life have produced immense hardship for the indigenous communities that live in Chitwan. Their livelihoods have been seriously affected, especially those of the landless Bote-Majhi and Musahar. Fishing and harvesting of forest products is no longer possible. The nutritional standards of the communities have fallen noticeably. The struggle launched by the people, to which this study now turns its attention, has to be understood as a struggle for life. Gradually, a mass movement has evolved, but it has very much remained a grassroots movement. Emergence of MMBKSS The resistance movement of the indigenous people started in 1983/84 (2040 BS) ‘before democracy’. Ten active individuals from different villages organised informal meetings to discuss their problems. Their efforts did not go unchallenged, particularly by local elites (e.g., landlords). Bote-Majhi leaders were persuaded to renounce their attempt to register a formal organisation. In response to complaints filed by local elites, police took action. By 1986 (2042 BS) arrest warrants had been issued for the leaders of the movement. Once, while mobilising the people, the leaders were forced to take refuge in the forest and went underground for months. They hid in the forests of Gajapur across from Sighrauli. Amar Bahadur Majhi, Jit Bahadur Majhi and his wife, Buli Ram Majhi, Tej Bahadur Bote, Hari Bahadur Musahar, Kaliya Musahar, and others had to desert their villages. Interestingly, they report that Army personnel were fairly cooperative while they hid inside the National Park and relied on the products of the forest.
  • S.N Local Government Bodies EN स्थानीय तहको नाम NP District

    S.N Local Government Bodies EN स्थानीय तहको नाम NP District

    S.N Local Government Bodies_EN थानीय तहको नाम_NP District LGB_Type Province Website 1 Fungling Municipality फु ङलिङ नगरपालिका Taplejung Municipality 1 phunglingmun.gov.np 2 Aathrai Triveni Rural Municipality आठराई त्रिवेणी गाउँपालिका Taplejung Rural municipality 1 aathraitribenimun.gov.np 3 Sidingwa Rural Municipality लिदिङ्वा गाउँपालिका Taplejung Rural municipality 1 sidingbamun.gov.np 4 Faktanglung Rural Municipality फक्ताङिुङ गाउँपालिका Taplejung Rural municipality 1 phaktanglungmun.gov.np 5 Mikhwakhola Rural Municipality लि啍वाखोिा गाउँपालिका Taplejung Rural municipality 1 mikwakholamun.gov.np 6 Meringden Rural Municipality िेररङिेन गाउँपालिका Taplejung Rural municipality 1 meringdenmun.gov.np 7 Maiwakhola Rural Municipality िैवाखोिा गाउँपालिका Taplejung Rural municipality 1 maiwakholamun.gov.np 8 Yangworak Rural Municipality याङवरक गाउँपालिका Taplejung Rural municipality 1 yangwarakmuntaplejung.gov.np 9 Sirijunga Rural Municipality लिरीजङ्घा गाउँपालिका Taplejung Rural municipality 1 sirijanghamun.gov.np 10 Fidhim Municipality दफदिि नगरपालिका Panchthar Municipality 1 phidimmun.gov.np 11 Falelung Rural Municipality फािेिुुंग गाउँपालिका Panchthar Rural municipality 1 phalelungmun.gov.np 12 Falgunanda Rural Municipality फा쥍गुनन्ि गाउँपालिका Panchthar Rural municipality 1 phalgunandamun.gov.np 13 Hilihang Rural Municipality दिलििाङ गाउँपालिका Panchthar Rural municipality 1 hilihangmun.gov.np 14 Kumyayek Rural Municipality कु म्िायक गाउँपालिका Panchthar Rural municipality 1 kummayakmun.gov.np 15 Miklajung Rural Municipality लि啍िाजुङ गाउँपालिका