DOCSLIB.ORG

Quaternary Reactivation of the Kern Canyon Fault System, Southern Sierra Nevada, California

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Quaternary Reactivation of the Kern Canyon Fault System, Southern Sierra Nevada, California Published online May 20, 2010; doi:10.1130/B30009.1 Quaternary reactivation of the Kern Canyon fault system, southern Sierra Nevada, California Elisabeth S. Nadin† and Jason B. Saleeby Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, MS 100-23, Pasadena, California 91125, USA ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION the Isabella basin (Fig. 2), is a geographically signifi cant location for defi ning Kern Canyon The Kern Canyon fault, the longest fault The Sierra Nevada batholith of California is fault geometry. South of the Isabella basin, the in the southern Sierra Nevada, is an active one of the world’s largest batholiths, and was Kern Canyon fault has been interpreted to con- structure and has been reactivated at discrete assembled by multiple intrusive events largely nect with the Breckenridge scarp and the White times over the past ~100 m.y. in response to during Cretaceous time. The mountain range Wolf fault (Fig. 1; e.g., Ross, 1986). Across this changing lithospheric stresses. After initiation and westward-adjacent Great Valley, fi lled northeast-striking segment of the fault zone, as a Cretaceous transpressional structure, largely with sediments eroded from the batho- brittle deformation is localized along discrete the Kern Canyon fault transitioned into a lith, together constitute a semi-rigid crustal fractures across an ~150-m-wide zone at the dextral strike-slip shear zone that remained block termed the Sierra Nevada microplate, currently exposed surface. This segment devel- active as it was exhumed into the brittle re- whose velocity and rotation vectors differ from oped ca. 86 Ma as a plastic-to-brittle structure gime during regional Late Cretaceous uplift those of the rest of North America (Argus and during exhumation of the southernmost part of of the Sierra Nevada batholith. The Kern Gordon, 1991; Dixon et al., 2000; Sella et al., the batholith (Nadin and Saleeby, 2008; Saleeby Canyon fault was reactivated during Miocene 2002). This “microplate” is bounded to the et al., 2009). North of the Isabella basin, brittle regional extension as part of a transfer zone west by the San Andreas transpressive plate structures of the Kern Canyon fault overprint between two differentially extending domains junction. To the east are the Eastern Califor- the proto–Kern Canyon fault (labeled PKCF in in the southern Sierra Nevada. Subsequent nia Shear Zone and its northward continuation, Fig. 1), a 2-km-wide zone of pervasively duc- normal displacement along the fault began in the Walker Lane (Fig. 1), which together form tilely sheared igneous and metamorphic rocks. Pliocene time. New evidence for fault activity, the western boundary of the Basin and Range The proto–Kern Canyon fault was a transpres- which continued into late Quaternary time, extensional province (e.g., Jones et al., 2004). sive structure that accommodated arc-normal includes its current geomorphic expression Geodetic data show that the Eastern California shortening and dextral offset from 100 to 80 Ma as a series of meters-high, west-side-up scarps Shear Zone–Walker Lane belt is undergoing (Nadin and Saleeby, 2008). that crop out discontinuously along the fault’s dextral shear that accounts for ~20% of total Part of the Kern Canyon fault system near the 130-km length. Relocated focal mechanisms relative motion between the North American latitude of the Isabella basin was remobilized as of modern earthquakes confirm ongoing and Pacifi c plates (Dokka and Travis, 1990; an early to middle Miocene oblique-slip transfer normal faulting, and geodetic measure ments Thatcher et al., 1999; Dixon et al., 2000; Gans zone between two extensional domains, one at suggest that the Sierra Nevada is uplifting et al., 2000; Bennett et al., 2003; Oldow et al., the southernmost end of the San Joaquin basin relative to the adjacent valleys. This evidence 2008; Hammond and Thatcher, 2007). and the other just east of the Isabella basin (see for recent activity overturns a long-held Many studies have shown that there is active Fig. 2 for landmarks; see fi g. 8 of Mahéo et al., view that the Kern Canyon fault has been faulting in the eastern Sierra Nevada range front 2009, for extensional domains). The Brecken- in active for more than 3.5 m.y. Its reactiva- (recent selected references: Le et al., 2007; ridge scarp and White Wolf fault segments of tion indicates that deformation repeatedly Surpless , 2008; Taylor et al., 2008). There have the Kern Canyon fault system lie between these localized along a preexisting crustal weak- also been predictions of extensional defor- extensional domains and are undergoing Qua- ness, a Cretaceous shear zone. We propose mation within the southern part of the Sierra ternary offset, with the notable 1952 M = 7.3 that a system of inter related normal faults, Nevada batholith (Jones et al., 2004) and, more Kern County earthquake attributed to the White including the Kern Canyon fault, is respond- recently, evidence for uplift of the southern Wolf fault. However, focal mechanisms along ing to mantle lithosphere removal beneath Sierra Nevada relative to the Owens Valley to the Breckenridge scarp, the White Wolf fault, the southern Sierra Nevada region. The loca- the east (Fay et al., 2008; see Fig. 1 for location). and the Kern Canyon fault segment north of tion of the active Kern Canyon fault within This study presents the fi rst documentation of the Isabella basin indicate substantially differ- the Sierra Nevada–Great Valley microplate active extensional structures within the range ent styles of modern deformation, which we de- indicates that deformation is occurring within that are consistent with the predicted uplift. scribe in this paper. the microplate. We defi ne the Kern Canyon fault system as The Kern Canyon fault has long been consid- an ~130-km-long zone of faulted basement, ered inactive because a 3.5 Ma lava fl ow (Dal- with several parallel, near-vertical fault strands rymple, 1963) was reported to cap its northern † E-mail: [email protected]; Current address: end (Webb, 1936). Our recent fi eld investiga- Department of Geology and Geophysics, University that strike generally northward from the south- of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775-5780, ern edge of the Sierra Nevada along the batho- tions reveal that the basalt is pervasively frac- USA. lith’s long axis (Fig. 1). Latitude 35.7°N, at tured and measurably displaced along the trace GSA Bulletin; September/October 2010; v. 122; no. 9/10; p. 1671–1685; doi: 10.1130/B30009.1; 9 fi gures; 2 tables. For permission to copy, contact [email protected] 1671 © 2010 Geological Society of America Nadin and Saleeby Lake Tahoe CA SSierra Nevada batholith i WalkerW Lane e r a NV r l a k e Pacific Ocean N r e Mono Lake v Figure 1. Regional tectonic a L d a framework, with features dis- a n e cussed in the text. The southern b a t Sierra Nevada batholith and h o westward adjacent San Joaquin San Joaquin Valle l EasternE California Shear Zo 37° 38° 39° N i t a Valley host the main features h s t e discussed: the proto–Kern Can- San r Mesozoic OV n yon, Kern Canyon, Brecken- C intrusive rocks a l ridge, and White Wolf faults. i f Also of note are the Walker Paleozoic and Mesozoic SNFF o (P)KCF IWV r metasedimentary- n Lane–Eastern California Shear y i Andreas a metavolcanic rocks KCF Zone belt of seismicity and the S Bakersfield h BF F e Sierra Nevada frontal fault. OV - Owens Valley a PKC r The box outlines the region IWV - Indian Wells Valley WWF 35° 36° Z o shown in Figures 2, 3, 7, and 8. Garlock Mojavefault Desert nne (P)KCF - (Proto) Kern Canyon fault e KCF - Kern Canyon fault fault BF - Breckenridge fault WWF - White Wolf fault 34° SNFF- Sierra Nevada frontal fault 125° W124° 123° 122° 121° 120° 119° 118° 117° 116° of the fault. Our geomorphic and structural stud- northwest of the Isabella basin (Jones et al., dipping normal faults that (1) place Cretaceous ies, presented here, are used to estimate Quater- 1994; surface projection outlined in Fig. 2) granitic bedrock of the footwall against Quater- nary offset along the Kern Canyon fault system. that has been interpreted to result from the re- nary alluvium of the hanging wall, and (2) cut These are distinguished from late Cenozoic ver- moval of ~106 km3 of dense eclogitic material and offset a 3.5 Ma lava fl ow. The scarps off- tical offsets within the southernmost 200 km of from beneath the southern Sierra Nevada batho- set Pliocene volcanic deposits and Quaternary the Sierra Nevada batholith (Fig. 3), which were lith (e.g., Ducea and Saleeby, 1998; Jones et al., sedimentary deposits and are classifi ed here as revealed by low-temperature thermo chrono- 2004). The presence of extensional structures in young and potentially active structures of the metric studies by Mahéo et al. (2009). Persis- the vicinity of the Isabella anomaly supports pre- Kern Canyon fault system. We distinguish them tent seismicity associated with the Kern Canyon dictions that Pliocene removal of dense eclogitic from the ca. 100 Ma damage zone along which fault system and the contiguous Breckenridge material should increase extensional strain in the they localized, and assess their potential geo- scarp and White Wolf fault (Ross, 1986), as well area (e.g., Jones et al., 2004). This paper docu- dynamic signifi cance. We also present a synthe- as contemporary strain-fi eld models derived in ments fault activity in what was considered a sis of seismic studies to show that normal-fault part from seismic studies (Bawden et al., 1997; tectonically quiescent region between the active earthquakes are associated with continued activ- Unruh and Hauksson, 2009), are also presented strike-slip San Andreas plate boundary and the ity along these scarps.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 3. Seismicity of Southern California* by Charle S F
    3. SEISMICITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA* BY CHARLE S F. RICHTER t AND B ENO GUTENBERG l Evidence for regional seismicity is of four kinds : ( 1) geological ment of only a few inches along the line of the Manix fault; Instru­ field observation of fault phenomena, ( 2) historical documents, ( 3) mental locations of epicenters of aftershocks aligned nearly at right instrumental recording, and ( 4) fi eld investigation immediately after angles to this fault, suggesting that the observed displacement is li earthquakes. secondary result of a larger displacement on a fault with different Historical and instrumental data cover a very small part of ge­ strike in the basement rocks; (6) July 21, 1952. Arvin-Tehachapi ological time, and thus constitute only a snapshot of the record, so earthquake, Kern County; probably thrust faulting, with surface to speak. They may furnish positive evidence of seismicity, but expression obscured and complicated by large-scale slumping and failure of earthquakes to occur on a given fault during a period of sliding; White Wolf fault. less than two centuries is no proof of quiescence. On the other hand, The historical record begins with a strong earthquake felt by the identifying faults as active on the basis of field evidence alone im­ Portola expedition on July 28, 1769, when the explorers were in plies an assumption that there have been no significant permanent camp along the Santa Ana River near the present townsite of Olive. changes in seismicity in a few tens of thousands of years. This Subsequent information for all of California is extremely scanty assumption is reasonable, but it does not necessarily apply without until 1850, and in southern California the record is imperfect for exception.
    [Show full text]
  • Displacements on the Imperial, Superstition Hills, and San Andreas Faults Triggered by the Borrego Mountain Earthquake1
    DISPLACEMENTS ON THE IMPERIAL, SUPERSTITION HILLS, AND SAN ANDREAS FAULTS TRIGGERED BY THE BORREGO MOUNTAIN EARTHQUAKE1 By CLARENCE R. ALLEN) SEISMOLOGICAL LABORATORY) CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY) MAx WYss) LAMONT-DOHERTY GEOLOGICAL OBSERVATORY OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY} jAMES N. BRUNE) INSTITUTE OF GEOPHYSICS AND PLANETARY PHYSICS) UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA} SAN DIEGO} AND ARTHUR GRANTZ and RoBERT E. WALLACE} U.S. GEOLOGICAL SuRVEY ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION The Borrego Mountain earthquake of April 9, 1968, trig­ The Borrego Mountain earthquake of April 9, 1968 gered small but consistent surface displacements on three (magnitude 6.4) was associated not only with a con­ faults far outside the source area and zone of aftershock activity. Right-lateral displacement of 1-2% em occurred spicuous surface-break in its source region along the along 22, 23, and 30 km of the Imperial, Superstition Hills, Coyote Creek fault (Clark, "Surface Rupture Along and San Andreas (Banning-Mission Cre.ek) faults, respec­ the Coyote Creek Fault," this volume), but also with tively, at distances of 70, 45, and 50 km from the epicenter. displacements far outside the epicentral region along Although these displacements were not noticed until 4 days three major faults in the Imperial Valley region to after the earthquake, their association with the earthquake is suggested by the freshness of the resultant en echelon the east and southeast of the epicenter (fig. 52). The 2 cracks at that time and by the absence of creep along most Imperial, Superstition Hills, and San Andreas faults of these faults during the year before or the year after the broke along segments at least 22, 23, and 30 km long, event.
    [Show full text]
  • Signature of Author:
    KINEMATICMODELS OF DEFORMATIONIN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CONSTRAINEDBY GEOLOGICAND GEODETICDATA Lori A. Eich S.B. Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2003 SUBMITTEDTO THE DEPARTMENTOF EARTH, ATMOSPHERIC, AND PLANETARYSCIENCES IN PARTIALFULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTSFOR THE DEGREEOF AT THE MASSACHUSETTSINSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY I FEBRUARY2006 1 LIBRARIES O 2006 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All rights reserved. Signature of Author: ....................................................................................:. ................................... Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences September 2 1,2005 Certified by: ...................................................%. .......... .%. .............. - ....- .. ......................................... Bradford H. Hager Cecil and Ida Green Professor of Earth Sciences Thesis Supervisor Accepted by: ................................................................................................................................. Maria T. Zuber E. A. Griswold Professor of Geophysics Head, Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences Kinematic Models of Deformation in Southern California Constrained by Geologic and Geodetic Data Lori A. Eich Submitted to the Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences on January 20,2006, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences Abstract Using a standardized fault geometry based on
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Scec Annual Technical Report
    1 2019 SCEC ANNUAL TECHNICAL REPORT - SCEC Award 19031 Evaluate & Refine 3D Fault and Deformed Surface Geometry to Update & Improve the SCEC Community Fault Model Craig Nicholson Marine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-6150 Summary Since SCEC3, I and my colleagues Andreas Plesch, Chris Sorlien, John Shaw, Egill Hauksson, and now Scott Marshall continue to make steady and significant improvements to the SCEC Community Fault Model (CFM), culminating in the release of CFM-v5.3 [Nicholson et al., 2019]. This on-going systematic update represents a substantial improvement of 3D fault models for southern California. The CFM-v3 fault set was expanded from 170 faults to over 860 fault objects and alternative representations in CFM- v5.3 that define nearly 400 faults organized into 106 complex fault systems (Fig.1). Most of these updated 3D fault models were developed by UCSB, or to which UCSB made significant contributions. This includes all the major fault models of major fault systems (e.g., San Andreas, San Jacinto, Elsinore- Laguna Salada, Newport-Inglewood, Imperial, Garlock, etc.), and most major faults in the Mojave, Eastern & Western Transverse Ranges, offshore Borderland, and updated faults within designated Special Fault Study or Earthquake Gate Areas (Fig.1) [Nicholson et al., 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019; Sorlien et al, 2012, 2014, 2015, 2016; Sorlien and Nicholson, 2015]. These new models allow for more realistic, curviplanar, complex 3D fault geometry, including changes in dip and dip direction along strike and down dip, based on the changing patterns of earthquake hypocenter and nodal plane alignments and, where possible, imaging subsurface fault geometry with industry seismic reflection data.
    [Show full text]
  • Internal Deformation of the Southern Sierra Nevada Microplate Associated with Foundering Lower Lithosphere, California
    Geodynamics and Consequences of Lithospheric Removal in the Sierra Nevada, California themed issue Internal deformation of the southern Sierra Nevada microplate associated with foundering lower lithosphere, California Jeffrey Unruh1, Egill Hauksson2, and Craig H. Jones3 1Lettis Consultants International, Inc., 1981 North Broadway, Suite 330, Walnut Creek, California 94596, USA 2Seismological Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA 3Department of Geological Sciences and CIRES (Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences), CB 399, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0399, USA ABSTRACT here represents westward encroachment of Sierra Nevada east of the Isabella anomaly. The dextral shear into the microplate from the seismicity represents internal deformation of the Quaternary faulting and background eastern California shear zone and southern Sierra Nevada microplate, a large area of central seismicity in the southern Sierra Nevada Walker Lane belt. The strain rotation may and northern California that moves ~13 mm/yr microplate are concentrated east and south refl ect the presence of local stresses associated to the northwest relative to stable North Amer- of the Isabella anomaly, a high-velocity body with relaxation of subsidence in the vicinity ica as an independent and nominally rigid block in the upper mantle interpreted to be lower of the Isabella anomaly. Westward propaga- (Argus and Gordon, 1991, 2001). At the latitude Sierra lithosphere that is foundering into the tion of foundering lithosphere, with spatially of the Isabella anomaly, the majority of micro- astheno sphere. We analyzed seismicity in this associated patterns of upper crustal deforma- plate translation is accommodated by mixed region to evaluate patterns of upper crustal tion similar to those documented herein, can strike-slip and normal faulting in the southern deformation above and adjacent to the Isa- account for observed late Cenozoic time- and Walker Lane belt (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Active Tectonics at Wheeler Ridge, Southern San Joaquin Valley, California
    Active tectonics at Wheeler Ridge, southern San Joaquin Valley, California E. A. Keller* Environmental Studies Program and Department of Geological Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106 R. L. Zepeda 1342 Grove Street, Alameda, California 94501 T. K. Rockwell Department of Geological Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, California 91282 T. L. Ku Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-0740 W. S. Dinklage Department of Geological Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106 ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION where geomorphic surfaces are folded over the anticlinal axis (Zepeda et al., 1986). In addition, Wheeler Ridge is an east-west–trending Buried reverse faults associated with actively the 1952 Kern County earthquake was centered anticline that is actively deforming on the up- deforming folds are known to produce large earth- below Wheeler Ridge, but not on the Wheeler per plate of the Pleito–Wheeler Ridge thrust- quakes. Several recent, large California earth- Ridge thrust fault; therefore the potential earth- fault system. Holocene and late Pleistocene de- quakes are examples: M = 6.7, Northridge, 1994; quake hazard in the area is clear. formation is demonstrated at the eastern end M = 6.1, Whittier Narrows, 1987; MS = 6.4, The primary goals of the research at Wheeler of the anticline where Salt Creek crosses the Coalinga, 1983, and MS = 7.7, Kern County, Ridge are (1) to characterize the tectonic geomor- anticlinal axis. Uplift, tilting, and faulting, as- 1952. Detailed investigations of folding associ- phology; (2) to develop the Pleistocene chronol- sociated with the eastward growth of the anti- ated with concealed reverse faults are therefore ogy; and (3) to test the hypothesis that climatic cline, are documented by geomorphic surfaces necessary in order to better understand earthquake perturbations are responsible for most Pleistocene that are higher and older to the west.
    [Show full text]
  • Marilyn P. Maccabe, Editor U.S. Geological Survey 345 Middlefield
    EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS REDUCTION PROGRAM PROJECT SUMMARIES - 1979-80 Marilyn P. MacCabe, Editor U.S. Geological Survey 345 Middlefield Road Menlo Park, California 94025 Open-File Report 81-41 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey standards Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the USGS CONTENTS Introduction ........................... 1 Highlights of Major Accomplishments .................. 2 Earthquake Hazards ....................... 2 Earthquake Prediction ...................... 5 Global Seismology ........................ 7 Induced Seismicity ........................ 9 Project Summaries .......................... 10 Earthquake Hazards Studies .................... 10 Earthquake potential ..................... 10 Tectonic framework, Quaternary geology, and active faults . 10 California ...................... 10 Western U.S. (excluding California) ........... 21 Eastern U.S. ..................... 31 National ...................... 34 Earthquake recurrence and age dating .............. 35 Earthquake effects ...................... 41 Ground Motion .............. ....... 41 Ground failure ...................... 51 Surface faulting ..................... 54 Post-earthquake studies .................. 55 Earthquake losses ...................... 55 Transfer of Research Findings ................. 56 Earthquake Prediction Studies ................... 57 Location of areas where large earthquake are most likely to occur . 57 Syntheses of seismicity,
    [Show full text]
  • Geomorphic Constraints on the Evolution of the Kern Gorge, Southern Sierra Nevada
    Geomorphic constraints on the evolution of the Kern Gorge, southern Sierra Nevada, California By Blake C. Foreshee A Thesis Submitted to the Department of Geological Sciences, California State University Bakersfield In Partial Fulfillment for the Degree of Masters of Geology Summer 2017 Copyright By Blake C. Foreshee 2017 Geom(Jrpbh; Con:!tlrainls on lb t- E,·ulut1oo or4.1 1¢ F<c1·n Go•·ge, Southern Sien-a Nevada, Caljfornia By Blake Foreshee Thi10 thesis has bt!eo a&<:ept.ed uo behalf or UlC Dcp;:u·tmcnl of Geological Sciences by their supervisor}' t:OII'imi u;ee: ~v~---- Dr. W1lh<~m C. Krugh A sst~ Ian t. Prn rr.s ~or of Gr.ology, Cfl lit"orn [a St>lt e lJ n i \' er~ity, Haker;;fie:u Commi:tcc Chclir' Pmfc.<Sod :~.:' Univmity, lli<ke,ftdd Ur. Acl<~m ~ u :\ s ~ i st<mt l'rofessor of Geology, Cal ifumla SWt.tl Un iVCl'Si t~r. Ra l<ersfi el d ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I want to thank, first and foremost, my advisor and committee chair Dr. William C. Krugh for guiding and mentoring me through this thesis project. Thank you for leading me through an intriguing investigation of the Sierra Nevada and for expressing passion and enthusiasm throughout the duration of this work. I am grateful for my committee members Dr. Adam Guo and Dr. Anthony Rathburnfor providing constructive support and feedback during this project. Thank you Dr. Greg Wilkerson for taking time out of your schedule to go into the field and show me around the lower Kern River.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Photo Lineaments, Southern Sierra Nevada, California
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Air photo lineaments, southern Sierra Nevada, California by Donald C. Ross1 Open-File Report 89-365 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U. S. Government. 'Menlo Park, California 1989 CONTENTS Page Introduction .................................................................................................................................... i Discussion .................................................................................................................................... 2 Air photo lineaments along known faults.............................................................................. 2 San Andreas and Garlock faults................................................................................. 2 Kern Canyon-Breckenridge-White Wolf fault zone.................................................. 2 Durmc>c>d fault?.........7...:............... 2 Pinyon Peak fault....................................................................................................... 4 Jawbone fault............................................................................................................. 4 Sierra Nevada fault.................................................................................................... 4 Kern River fault........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 21St Century Dam Design — Advances and Adaptations
    United States Society on Dams 21st Century Dam Design — Advances and Adaptations 31st Annual USSD Conference San Diego, California, April 11-15, 2011 CONTENTS Plenary Session Managing Multiple Priorities: Raising a Dam, Operating a Reservoir, and Coordinating a System of Projects ............................1 Kelly Rodgers and Gerald E. Reed III, San Diego County Water Authority; Rosalva Morales and Yana Balotsky, City of San Diego; Thomas O. Keller, GEI Consultants, Inc.; and Kevin N. Davis, Black & Veatch Corporation Partnering with Project Stakeholders at the San Vicente Dam Raise...........3 Thomas C. Haid, Parsons/Black & Veatch JV; Gerald E. Reed III, Vic Bianes and Kelly Rodgers, San Diego County Water Authority; and William A. Corn, Shimmick Construction Company Managing Unexpected Endangered Species Issues on Bid-Ready Projects........5 Anita M. Hayworth, Dudek; Mary Putnam, San Diego County Water Authority; and Douglas Gettinger, Jeffrey D. Priest and Paul M. Lemons, Dudek Planning and Cost Reduction Considerations for RCC Dam Construction........7 Adam Zagorski, Shimmick/Obayashi JV; and Mike Pauletto, M. Pauletto and Associates Ten Years After the World Commission on Dams Report: Where Are We?........9 Manoshree Sundaram, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Australian Risk Approach for Assessment of Dams ...................11 M. Barker, GHD The Relative Health of the Dams and Reservoirs Market ................13 Del A. Shannon, ASI Constructors, Inc. Design of the Dams of the Panama Canal Expansion ..................15 Lelio Mejia, John Roadifer and Mike Forrest, URS Corporation; and Antonio Abrego and Maximiliano De Puy, Autoridad del Canal de Panama Concrete Dams: Advances in Analysis Myponga Dam Stability Evaluation: Modeling Stress Relaxation for Arch Dams Using Linear Finite Element Analysis ..........................17 Scott L.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Cenozoic Structure and Tectonics of the Southern Sierra Nevada–San Joaquin Basin Transition, California
    Research Paper GEOSPHERE Late Cenozoic structure and tectonics of the southern Sierra Nevada–San Joaquin Basin transition, California GEOSPHERE, v. 15, no. 4 Jason Saleeby and Zorka Saleeby Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA https://doi.org/10.1130/GES02052.1 ■ ABSTRACT the San Joaquin Basin is widely known for its Neogene deep-marine condi- 17 figures; 3 tables; 1 set of supplemental files tions that produced prolific hydrocarbon reserves (Hoots et al., 1954). Rarely This paper presents a new synthesis for the late Cenozoic tectonic, paleogeo- in the literature are the late Cenozoic geologic features of these two adjacent CORRESPONDENCE: [email protected] graphic, and geomorphologic evolution of the southern Sierra Nevada and adja- regions discussed in any depth together. The late Cenozoic features of these cent eastern San Joaquin Basin. The southern Sierra Nevada and San Joaquin Ba- two regions speak to a number of significant issues in tectonics and geomor- CITATION: Saleeby, J., and Saleeby, Z., 2019, Late Cenozoic structure and tectonics of the southern Si- sin contrast sharply, with the former constituting high-relief basement exposures phology. These include: (1) the Earth’s surface responses to geologically rapid erra Nevada–San Joaquin Basin transition, Califor- and the latter constituting a Neogene marine basin with superposed low-relief changes in the distribution of mantle lithosphere loads; (2) the stability of nia: Geosphere, v. 15, no. 4, p. 1164–1205, https:// uplifts actively forming along its margins. Nevertheless, we show that Neogene cover strata–basement transition zones and the time scales over which pro- doi .org /10.1130 /GES02052.1.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.6 Geologic and Seismic Hazards
    METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD METROPOLITAN BAKERSFIELD GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR 4.6 GEOLOGIC AND SEISMIC HAZARDS The purpose of this Section is to describe the geologic and seismic setting of the Bakersfield Metropolitan area, identify potential impacts associated with implementation of the General Plan Update, reference General Plan goals, policies, and standards, and, where necessary, recommends mitigation measures to reduce the significance of impacts. The issues addressed in this section include risks associated with: faults, strong seismic ground shaking, seismic related ground failure such as liquefaction, landslides, and unstable geologic units and/or soils. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING GEOLOGY Geologic Structure The Metropolitan Bakersfield area is a part of the Great Valley Geomorphic Province of California which is an alluvial plain, about 50 miles wide and 400 miles long, between the Coast Ranges and Sierra Nevada. The Great Valley is drained by the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers, which join and enter San Francisco Bay. The southern part of the Great Valley is the San Joaquin Valley. The Valley is a northwesterly trending trough (geocycline) filled with immense thickness of sediments (estimated at 40,000 feet at the axis) deposited from surrounding mountains. Streams flowing westerly from the Sierra Nevada have eroded and deposited materials into the trough, forming alluvial fans at the surface. The largest of these in the Plan area is the Kern River fan, covering about 300 square miles of the valley and made up of sand, silt and clay deposits. The Kern River flood plain is incised into the upper part of the fan, north of downtown Bakersfield, and spread out across the broad, flat lower fan to the southwest.
    [Show full text]