DOCSLIB.ORG

COMPLETE STREETS DESIGN GUIDE THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Complete Streets Design Guide ACTIVITY LOG Complete Streets Design Guide ACTIVITY LOG

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
COMPLETE STREETS DESIGN GUIDE THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Complete Streets Design Guide ACTIVITY LOG Complete Streets Design Guide ACTIVITY LOG Los Angeles Great Streets for Streets Great CITY OF LOS ANGELES COMPLETE STREETS DESIGN GUIDE THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Complete Streets Design Guide ACTIVITY LOG Complete Streets Design Guide ACTIVITY LOG Street Standards Commitee Amendments Date Amendment III ACTIVITY LOG Complete Streets Design Guide Date Amendment IV THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Complete Streets Design Guide Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 3 Goals of the Guide � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 3 4 �9 Bicycle Parking � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 87 Complete Streets Design � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 4 4 �10 Bikeshare Stations � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 91 Applicability � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 4 4 �11 Parking Meters and Pay Stations � � � � � � � � � � � 93 Design Immunity � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 5 4 �12 Utilities and other infrastructure � � � � � � � � � � 95 Guide Organization � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 5 4 �13 Street Lighting � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 97 Glossary � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 6 4 �14 Waste and Recycling Receptacles � � � � � � � � � 101 Definitions � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 7 4 �15 Parklets � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 104 Right-of-Way Zones and Sample Uses � � � � � � � � � � 10 4 �16 Bus Stop Location � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 107 4 �17 Bus Bulb � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 109 2. STREET CLASSIFICATIONS . 15 4 �18 Sidewalk Equestrian Trails � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �111 Introduction � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 15 4 �19 Esplanade � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 113 Network Overlays � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 16 Additional Overlays � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 17 5. ROADWAYS . .117 Arterial Streets � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 18 Introduction � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �117 Non-Arterial Streets � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 22 5 �1 Pedestrian Plaza � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 118 Hillside Streets� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 25 5 �2 Bicycle Lane � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 120 Service Road � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 27 5 �3 Protected Bicycle Lane � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 127 Other Public Rights-of-Way � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 29 5 �4 Shared Lane Marking (Sharrow) � � � � � � � � � � � � 131 5 �5 Bicycle Corral � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 133 3. COMPLETE STREET DIAGRAMS . 35 5 �6 Shared Bicycle-Bus Lane � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 135 Introduction � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 35 5 �7 Peak-hour Bus Lane � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 136 Complete Street Cross Sections � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 35 5 �8 Offset Bus Lane � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 138 Complete Street Sample Plan Views � � � � � � � � � � � � 51 5 �9 Median Bus Lane / Busway � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 139 5 �10 Bus Pad � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �141 4. SIDEWALK AREA ��������������������������������������������������57 5 �11 Median Bus Boarding Island � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 142 Introduction � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 57 5 �12 Lane Reconfiguration / Road Diet � � � � � � � � � 144 4 �1 Building Entries � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 58 5 �13 Lane Narrowing � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 146 4 �2 Portable Signage and Sidewalk 5 �14 Neckdown � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 147 Merchandising � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 60 5 �15 Chicane � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 148 4 �3 Streetscape Signage and Wayfinding � � � � � � � � 62 5 �16 Landscaped Median � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 150 4 �4 Public Seating � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 65 5 �17 Speed Feedback Sign � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 152 4 �5 Outdoor Dining � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 68 5 �18 On-Street Carshare Parking � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 153 4 �6 Public Art � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 71 5 �19 Back-In Angle Parking � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 154 4 �7 Street Trees and Landscaping � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 73 5 �20 Commercial Loading � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 156 4 �8 Stormwater Treatment and Management � � � � 78 V Complete Streets Design Guide  6. INTERSECTIONS AND CROSSINGS ������������������ 161 7. OFF-STREET NON-VEHICULAR TREATMENTS Introduction � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 161 AND STRATEGIES . 219 6 �1 Crosswalk Markings � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 162 Introduction � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 219 6 �2 Decorative Pavement Materials � � � � � � � � � � � � 165 7 �1 Bicycle Channel Ramps for Stairways � � � � � � � 220 6 �3 Advance Yield Markings � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 166 7 �2 Multi-Purpose Paths (Class I) � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 222 6 �4 Raised Crosswalk � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 167 7 �3 Multi-Purpose Paths in River and Utility 6 �5 Corner Bulbout � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 169 Corridors � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 229 6 �6 Curb Radius � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �171 7 �4 Multi-Purpose Paths in Existing Active Rail 6 �7 Curb Ramp � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 174 Corridor � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 231 6 �8 Crossing Refuge Island � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 176 7 �5 Multi-Purpose Path Constructed within New 6 �9 Driveways � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 178 Transit Corridor � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 233 6 �10 Bicycle Pavement Markings approaching an 7 �6 Coastal Paths � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 234 Intersection � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 180 7 �7 Grade-Separated Undercrossings and 6 �11 Bicycle Pavement Markings through an Overcrossings � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 236 Intersection � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 183 7 �8 Fencing for Bike Paths � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 239 6 �12 Bicycle Box � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 185 7 �9 Programming and Temporary Treatments � � � 241 6 �13 Two-Stage Turn Queue Box � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 187 6 �14 Bicycle-Only Left Turn Pocket � � � � � � � � � � � � 189 6 �15 Diverter � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 190 6 �16 Traffic Mini-Circle � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 192 6 �17 Mini-Roundabout � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 195 6 �18 Exclusive Pedestrian Phase � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 198 6 �19 Pedestrian Beacon � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 200 6 �20 Leading Pedestrian Interval � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 202 6 �21 Accessible Pedestrian Signal � � � � � � � � � � � � � 204 6 �22 Shorter Signal Cycle Length � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 205 6 �23 Split Phasing � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 207 6 �24 Bicycle-Only Signal � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 209 6 �25 Bicycle Loop Detector � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 211 6 �26 Bicycle Green Wave � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 213 6 �27 Transit Signal Prioritization � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 215 VI THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK COMPLETE STREETS DESIGN GUIDE INTRODUCTION 1 THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Complete Streets Design Guide 1. INTRODUCTION 1. INTRODUCTION Goals of the Guide Great Streets for Los Angeles: Complete Streets Design Guide lays out a vision for designing safe, accessible and vibrant streets in Los Angeles� As outlined in California’s Complete Streets Act of 2008 (AB 1358), the goal of Complete Streets is to ensure that the safety, accessibility, and convenience of all transportation users – pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, and motorists – is accommodated� Streets not only influence our mobility choices, but they also affect the safety and quality of life in our neighborhoods� When streets are designed with only vehicular throughput in mind, they create an environment that invites unsafe speeds� As a result, bicycling becomes more daunting and pedestrian walkways become less enjoyable� An overabundance of single-occupancy vehicles on the road slows down buses and other motorists, making public transit less convenient and driving more frustrating� When streets are continually widened to accommodate more vehicular volume, they create an induced demand for car travel that only encourages future traffic congestion� Los Angeles’ streets serve a much larger purpose than just moving cars� They can provide
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Traffic Calming Fact Sheets May 2018 Update Speed Table/Raised Crosswalks
    Traffic Calming Fact Sheets May 2018 Update Speed Table/Raised Crosswalks Description: • Long, raised speed humps with a flat section in the middle and ramps on the ends; sometimes constructed with brick or other textured materials on the flat section • If placed at a pedestrian crossing, it is referred to as a raised crosswalk • If placed only in one direction on a road, it is called an offset speed table Applications: • Appropriate for local and collector streets; mid-block or at intersections, with/without crosswalks • Can be used on a one-lane one-way or two-lane two-way street • Not appropriate for roads with 85th percentile speeds of 45 mph or more • Typically long enough for the entire wheelbase of a passenger car to rest on top or within limits of ramps • Work well in combination with textured crosswalks, curb extensions, and curb radius reductions • Can be applied both with and without sidewalks or dedicated bicycle facilities • Typically installed along closed-section roads (i.e. curb and gutter) but feasible on open section (Source: Google Maps, Boulder, Colorado) (Source: Delaware Department of Transportation) ITE/FHWA Traffic Calming EPrimer: https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/speedmgt/traffic_calm.cfm Design/Installation Issues: • ITE recommended practice – “Guidelines for the Design and Application of Speed Humps” • Most common height is between 3 and 4 inches (reported as high as 6 inches) • Ramps are typically 6 feet long (reported up to 10 feet long) and are either parabolic or linear • Careful design is needed for drainage
    [Show full text]
  • City Maintained Street Inventory
    City Maintained Streets Inventory DATE APPROX. AVG. STREET NAME ACCEPTED BEGINNING AT ENDING AT LENGTH WIDTH ACADEMYText0: ST Text6: HENDERSONVLText8: RD BROOKSHIREText10: ST T0.13 Tex20 ACADEMYText0: ST EXT Text6: FERNText8: ST MARIETTAText10: ST T0.06 Tex17 ACTONText0: WOODS RD Text6:9/1/1994 ACTONText8: CIRCLE DEADText10: END T0.24 Tex19 ADAMSText0: HILL RD Text6: BINGHAMText8: RD LOUISANAText10: AVE T0.17 Tex18 ADAMSText0: ST Text6: BARTLETText8: ST CHOCTAWText10: ST T0.16 Tex27 ADAMSWOODText0: RD Text6: CARIBOUText8: RD ENDText10: OF PAVEMENT T0.16 Tex26 AIKENText0: ALLEY Text6: TACOMAText8: CIR WESTOVERText10: ALLEY T0.05 Tex12 ALABAMAText0: AVE Text6: HANOVERText8: ST SWANNANOAText10: AVE T0.33 Tex24 ALBEMARLEText0: PL Text6: BAIRDText8: ST ENDText10: MAINT T0.09 Tex18 ALBEMARLEText0: RD Text6: BAIRDText8: ST ORCHARDText10: RD T0.2 Tex20 ALCLAREText0: CT Text6: ENDText8: C&G ENDText10: PVMT T0.06 Tex22 ALCLAREText0: DR Text6: CHANGEText8: IN WIDTH ENDText10: C&G T0.17 Tex18 ALCLAREText0: DR Text6: SAREVAText8: AVE CHANGEText10: IN WIDTH T0.18 Tex26 ALEXANDERText0: DR Text6: ARDIMONText8: PK WINDSWEPTText10: DR T0.37 Tex24 ALEXANDERText0: DR Text6: MARTINText8: LUTHER KING WEAVERText10: ST T0.02 Tex33 ALEXANDERText0: DR Text6: CURVEText8: ST ARDMIONText10: PK T0.42 Tex24 ALLENText0: AVE 0Text6:/18/1988 U.S.Text8: 25 ENDText10: PAV'T T0.23 Tex19 ALLENText0: ST Text6: STATEText8: ST HAYWOODText10: RD T0.19 Tex23 ALLESARNText0: RD Text6: ELKWOODText8: AVE ENDText10: PVMT T0.11 Tex22 ALLIANCEText0: CT 4Text6:/14/2009 RIDGEFIELDText8:
    [Show full text]
  • Accessibility and the Crowded Sidewalk: Micromobility’S Impact on Public Space CYNTHIA L
    Accessibility and The Crowded Sidewalk: Micromobility’s Impact on Public Space CYNTHIA L. BENNETT Carnegie Mellon University, [email protected] EMILY E. ACKERMAN Univerisity of Pittsburgh, [email protected] BONNIE FAN Carnegie Mellon University, [email protected] JEFFREY P. BIGHAM Carnegie Mellon University, [email protected] PATRICK CARRINGTON Carnegie Mellon University, [email protected] SARAH E. FOX Carnegie Mellon University, [email protected] Over the past several years, micromobility devices—small-scale, networked vehicles used to travel short distances—have begun to pervade cities, bringing promises of sustainable transportation and decreased congestion. Though proponents herald their role in offering lightweight solutions to disconnected transit, smart scooters and autonomous delivery robots increasingly occupy pedestrian pathways, reanimating tensions around the right to public space. Drawing on interviews with disabled activists, government officials, and commercial representatives, we chart how devices and policies co-evolve to fulfill municipal sustainability goals, while creating obstacles for people with disabilities whose activism has long resisted inaccessible infrastructure. We reflect on efforts to redistribute space, institute tech governance, and offer accountability to those who involuntarily encounter interventions on the ground. In studying micromobility within spatial and political context, we call for the HCI community to consider how innovation transforms as it moves out from centers of development toward peripheries of design consideration. CCS CONCEPTS • Human-centered computing~Accessibility~Empirical studies in accessibility Additional Keywords and Phrases: Micromobility, Accessibility, Activism, Governance, Public space ACM Reference Format: Cynthia L. Bennett, Emily E. Ackerman, Bonnie Fan, Jeffrey P. Bigham, Patrick Carrington, and Sarah E. Fox. 2021. Accessibility and The Crowded Sidewalk: Micromobility’s Impact on Public Space.
    [Show full text]
  • Download The
    DEVELOPMENT OF AN AGENT BASED SIMULATION MODEL FOR PEDESTRIAN INTERACTIONS by MOHAMED HUSSEIN B.Sc., Ain Shams University, 2004 M.Sc., Ain Shams University, 2010 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (Civil Engineering) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) December 2016 © Mohamed Hussein, 2016 Abstract Developing a solid understanding of pedestrian behavior is important for promoting walking as an active mode of transportation and enhancing pedestrian safety. Computer simulation of pedestrian dynamics has gained recent interest as an important tool in analyzing pedestrian behavior in many applications. As such, this thesis presents the details of the development of a microscopic simulation model that is capable of modeling detailed pedestrian interactions. The model was developed based on the agent-based modeling approach, which outperforms other existing modeling approaches in accounting for the heterogeneity of the pedestrian population and considering the pedestrian intelligence. Key rules that control pedestrian interactions in the model were extracted from a detailed pedestrian behavior study that was conducted using an automated computer vision platform, developed at UBC. The model addressed both uni-directional and bi- directional pedestrian interactions. A comprehensive methodology for calibrating model parameters and validating its results was proposed in the thesis. Model parameters that could be measured from the data were directly calibrated from actual pedestrian trajectories, acquired by means of computer vision. Other parameters were indirectly calibrated using a Genetic Algorithm that aimed at minimizing the error between actual and simulated trajectories. The validation showed that the average error between actual and simulated trajectories was 0.35 meters.
    [Show full text]
  • American Title a Sociation ~ ~
    OFFICIAL PUBLICATION AMERICAN TITLE A SOCIATION ~ ~ VOUJME XXXVI JUNE, 1957 NUMBER 6 TITLE NEWS Official Publication of THE AMERICAN TITLE ASSOCIATION 3608 Guardian Building-Detroit 26, Michigan Volume XXXVI June, 1957 Number 6 Table of Contents Introduction-The Federal Highway Program ......... ... ................ .. .................... 2 J. E. Sheridan Highway Laws Relating to Controlled Access Roads ..... .. ....... ........... 6 Norman A. Erbe Title Companies and the Expanded Right of Way Problems ...... ............. .. 39 , Daniel W. Rosencrans Arthur A. Anderson Samuel J. Some William A . Thuma INTRODUCTION The Federal Highway Program J. E. SHERIDAN We are extremely grateful to Nor­ veloped its planning sufficiently to man A. Erbe, Attorney General of the show to the satisfaction of the dis­ State of Iowa, for permission to re­ trict engineer the effect of the pro­ print his splendid brief embracing posed construction upon adjace.nt the highway laws of various states property, the treatment of access con­ relating to the control in access roads. trol in the area of Federal acquisi­ Mr. Erbe originally presented this m tion, and that appropriate arrange­ narrative form before the convention ments have been made for mainte­ of the Iowa Title Association in May nance and supervision over the land of this year. As is readily ascertain­ to be acquired and held in the name able, this is the result of a compre­ of the United States pending transfer hensive study of various laws touch· of title and jurisdiction to the State ing on the incidents of highway regu­ or the proper subdivision thereof." lations. Additionally, we are privi­ It is suggested that our members leged to carry the panel discussion bring this quoted portion to the at­ of the American Right of Way Asso­ tention of officers of the Highway ciation Convention held in Chicago, Department and the office of its legal May 16 and 17, dealing with "Title division, plus the Office of the Attor­ Companies and the Expanded Right ney General within the members' ju­ of Way Problems".
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Intersections –– Stopping at Intersections Are Places Where a Number of Road Users Cross Intersections Paths
    4 rules of the road Chapter 3, signs, signals and road markings, gave you some in this chapter information about the most common signs, signals and road markings you will see when driving. This chapter gives • Understanding you the information you’ll need to help you drive safely at intersections intersections, use lanes correctly and park legally. – signalling – types of intersections Understanding intersections – stopping at Intersections are places where a number of road users cross intersections paths. There is often a lot of activity in intersections, so it’s – right‑of‑way at important to be alert. Remember that other road users may be intersections in a hurry, and may want to move into the same space that you • Using lanes are planning on moving into. correctly – which lane Signalling should you use Signals are important — they let other traffic know what you are – lane tracking intending to do. You should signal when you’re preparing to: – turning lanes – reserved lanes • turn left or right – pulling into a • change lanes lane • park – passing – merging • move toward, or away from, the side of the road. – highway or freeway Types of intersections entrances and exits Controlled intersections – cul‑de‑sacs A controlled intersection is one that has signs or traffic lights – turning around telling you what to do. To drive safely in these intersections, you • Parking tips and need to know what the signals and signs mean, and also the rules right‑of‑way rules. But always be cautious. Other drivers may not be paying attention to the signs and signals. Uncontrolled intersections Uncontrolled intersections have no signs or traffic lights.
    [Show full text]
  • ALLEY (NS) – Washington Avenue to Wright Avenue, Deane Boulevard to Quincy Avenue
    ALLEY (NS) – Washington Avenue to Wright Avenue, Deane Boulevard to Quincy Avenue Alderman District 9 – Trevor Jung Existing pavement - Bituminous Right-of-way width - 16’ PCI – Alleys not rated Improvement Cost - Concrete at $74.00/ft Alderman Request Last Public Hearing Date – Never City of Racine - Assessment Schedule CITY ENGINEER'S OFFICE AUTHORITY - Benefits and Damage FOR: PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVING RESOLUTION NUMBER 058319 15-May-20 LOCATION - Alley (NS) from Washington Ave to Wright Ave, Deane Blv Page 1 of 2 TAXNO NAME FRONTAGE RATE BENEFITS ADJUST SPEC. ADJ. ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS ASSESSMENT 10192000 Mauer, Kristi L. 35.000$74.00 $2,590.00 $0.00 $0.00 1367 Deane Boulevard 1367 Deane Boulevard Racine, WI 53405 $2,590.00 10193000 Arndt, Ryan 35.000$74.00 $2,590.00 $0.00 $0.00 1365 Deane Boulevard 1365 Deane Boulevard Racine, WI 53405 $2,590.00 10194000 Kosterman, Robert P. & Margaret M. 35.000$74.00 $2,590.00 $0.00 $0.00 1363 Deane Boulevard 1363 Deane Boulevard Racine, WI 53405 $2,590.00 10195000 Lochowitz, Justin 35.000$74.00 $2,590.00 $0.00 $0.00 1359 Deane Boulevard 1359 Deane Boulevard Racine, WI 53405 $2,590.00 10195000 Lochowitz, Justin 35.000$74.00 $2,590.00 $0.00 $0.00 1359 Deane Boulevard 1359 Deane Boulevard Racine, WI 53405 $2,590.00 10196000 Johnson, Kenneth Sr. 35.000$74.00 $2,590.00 $0.00 $0.00 Cloyd, Christina 1355 Deane Boulevard 1355 Deane Boulevard Racine, WI 53405 $2,590.00 10197000 Garcia, Gregory 40.000$74.00 $2,960.00 $0.00 $0.00 1351 Deane Boulevard 1351 Deane Boulevard Racine, WI 53405 $2,960.00 10198000 Williams, Randall 40.000$74.00 $2,960.00 $0.00 $0.00 Veltus, Julie 1345 Deane Boulevard 5735 Ridgecrest Drive Racine, WI 53403 $2,960.00 10199000 Degroot, Matthew J.
    [Show full text]
  • "2. Sidewalks". "Boston Complete Streets Design Guide."
    Sidewalk Zone Widths The width of the sidewalk contributes to the degree of When making decisions for how to allocate sidewalk space, comfort and enjoyment of walking along a street. Narrow the following principles should be used: sidewalks do not support lively pedestrian activity, and may create dangerous conditions where people walk in the Frontage Zone street. Typically, a five foot wide Pedestrian Zone supports > The Frontage Zone should be maximized to provide space two people walking side by side or two wheel chairs passing for cafés, plazas, and greenscape elements along build- each other. An eight foot wide Pedestrian Zone allows two ing facades wherever possible, but not at the expense of pairs of people to comfortably pass each other, and a ten reducing the Pedestrian Zone beyond the recommended foot or wider Pedestrian Zone can support high volumes of minimum widths. pedestrians. Pedestrian Zone Vibrant sidewalks bustling with pedestrian activity are not > The Pedestrian Zone should be clear of any obstructions only used for transportation, but for social walking, lingering, including utilities, traffic control devices, trees, and furniture. and people watching. Sidewalks, especially along Downtown When reconstructing sidewalks and relocating utilities, all Commercial, Downtown Mixed-Use, and Neighborhood Main utility access points and obstructions should be relocated Streets, should encourage social uses of the sidewalk realm outside of the Pedestrian Zone. by providing adequate widths. > While sidewalks do not need to be perfectly straight, the SIDEWALKS Pedestrian Zone should not weave back and forth in the When determining sidewalk zone widths, factors to consider right-of-way for no other reason than to introduce curves.
    [Show full text]
  • Access Management Manual, September 5, 2019 TABLE of CONTENTS
    AccessAccess ManagementManagement ManualManual T E X A S Prepared by the City of Irving Public Works/Traffic and Transportation Department Adopted September 5, 2019 Access Management Manual, September 5, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 Introduction Page 1.0 Purpose 1 1.1 Scope 1 1.2 Definitions 3 1.3 Authority 10 Section 2 Principles of Access Management 2.1 Relationship between Access and Mobility 11 2.2 Integration of Land Use and Transportation 11 2.3 Relationship between Access and Roadway Efficiency 12 2.4 Relationship between Access and Traffic Safety 12 Section 3 Access Management Programs and Policies 3.1 Identifying Functional Hierarchy of Roadways 14 3.1.1 Sub-Classifications of Roadways 14 3.1.1.1 Revising the “Master Thoroughfare Plan” 15 3.1.2 Comprehensive Plan 15 3.1.3 Discretionary Treatment by the Director 15 3.2 Land Use 15 3.3 Unified Access Planning Policy 16 3.4 Granting Access 16 3.4.1 General Mutual Access 17 3.4.2 Expiration of Access Permission 17 3.4.3 “Grandfathered” Access and Non-Conforming Access 17 3.4.4 Illegal Access 19 3.4.4.1 Stealth Connection 19 3.4.5 Temporary Access 19 3.4.6 Emergency Access 19 3.4.7 Abandoned Access 20 3.4.8 Field Access 20 3.4.9 Provision for Special Case Access 20 3.4.10 Appeals, Variances and Administrative Remedies 20 3.5 Parking and Access Policy 20 3.6 Access vs Accessibility 21 3.7 Precedence of Access Rights Policy 21 3.8 Right to Access A Specific Roadway 22 3.9 Traffic Impact Analyses (TIA’s) 22 3.9.1 Level of Service (LOS) 22 3.9.2 Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Requirements
    [Show full text]
  • East Midtown Waterfront Esplanade Community Working Group June 24, 2013
    East Midtown Waterfront Esplanade Community Working Group June 24, 2013 East Midtown Waterfront Esplanade Project : Community Working Group 06/24/13 1 Agenda I. Project Overview a) Project Goals b) Project Considerations c) Progress Update II. Pre-Concept Design a) Design Inspiration b) Community Working Group 1 Meeting Summary c) Responding to Community Aspirations III. Breakout Session IV. Reporting Back V. Project Timeline and Next Steps East Midtown Waterfront Esplanade Project : Community Working Group 06/24/13 2 I Project Overview Site Context East Midtown Waterfront Esplanade Project : Community Working Group 06/24/13 4 Project Overview Contemplated by State legislation in July 2011: . Sponsored by State Assemblymember Brian Kavanagh and State Senator Liz Krueger (locally by Councilmember Daniel Garodnick) Project purpose: . Construct a continuous greenway from East 38th – 60th Street along the East River to create a critical transportation connection and to provide new open space to alleviate chronic shortage in the immediate area East Midtown Waterfront Esplanade Project : Community Working Group 06/24/13 5 Project Goals Provide Critical Transportation Route Achieve major transportation need and policy goal by filling critical gap . East Side of Manhattan lacks dedicated greenway for non-motorized transportation; creating one is a major public policy goal . Improve transportation options for thousands of pedestrians, joggers, rollerbladers and cyclists . Support alternative forms of transportation for New Yorkers and improve air quality Bicyclist on 2nd Ave & 38th Street NYC Bike Map in 2016 East Midtown Waterfront Esplanade Project : Community Working Group 06/24/13 7 Provide Waterfront Access & Open Space Provide waterfront access and new open space for densely populated East Midtown communities .
    [Show full text]
  • THE UNIVERSITY of SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI Department of Parking and Transit Services
    THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI Department of Parking and Transit Services Parking and Traffic Regulations 2020-2021 Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 105, Section 37-105-1 and Section 37-105-3, Mississippi Code of 1972, the Board of Trustees of State Institutions of Higher Learning hereby enacts the rules and regulations for vehicles, motorcycles and bicycles on the grounds of The University of Southern Mississippi campuses. A. GENERAL INFORMATION AND DEFINITIONS A.1. The University of Southern Mississippi reserves the right to regulate the use of all vehicles on the Hattiesburg and Gulf Park campuses and at the Gulf Coast Research Laboratory (GCRL), including the Halstead Road and Cedar Point locations, and to forbid the use of a vehicle by any person not complying with the regulations on its campuses or teaching/research sites under applicable Mississippi law and policies of the Mississippi State Institutions of Higher Learning. The University of Southern Mississippi, Department of Parking and Transit Services (PTS) is responsible for implementing and enforcing the parking regulations. Except where indicated, all regulations contained herein are enforced 24 hours a day, seven days a week. (Miss. Code Ann. § 37-105-3). A.2. The University utilizes a license plate recognition (LPR) system on all University-owned and controlled properties. License plates are used to verify that a vehicle can park at a particular location on university property. Faculty, staff and students are allowed up to four vehicles registered to a virtual parking permit. However, only one vehicle is allowed to park on a University property at any given time.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Streets Safe
    About WalkBoston WalkBoston plays an important role ensuring walker- CHICANE TREES BIKE friendly/safe designs and has an impressive record LANES of getting cities, towns, state agencies, developers, RAISED institutions, and elected officials to provide for the CROSSWALK needs of walkers. Every additional member helps our message be heard. Join online at walkboston.org. We work to transform communities into more walkable CURB places and reintroduce people to walking as a con- EXTENSION venient, healthy and low-cost transportation choice. People who depend on walking most: lower income, elders, children, people with disabilities, and transit PARKED users especially benefit from our advocacy. CARS SPEED How we can help you CUSHION • Advise on walking improvements for your community. MIDBLOCK CROSSWALK • Provide guidance, moral support, technical assistance. making • Give a variety of presentations on pedestrian design and advocacy. Speed Kills: Small-scale fixes go a long way to slow traffic • Help set up advocacy groups and strengthen them. • Demonstrate how these techniques are working streets The human costs and economic consequences of The tools can be small in scale, relatively inexpensive, across Massachusetts and elsewhere. speed-related crashes are immense. In 2007, about and are easily tested and evaluated. Streets can be 31 percent of all fatal crashes were speeding-related, made safer by putting them on a “road diet,” reducing safe resulting in 13,420 fatalities. In Massachusetts, 15 to speeds and enhancing pedestrian safety. Techniques Thanks to our supporters 20 percent of all road fatality victims are pedestrians. include signage, pavement devices and paint. Physically Nationwide, the economic cost to society of speed- or visually narrowing a standard width lane by 1 foot Striders ing-related crashes is estimated to be $40.4 billion slows cars by 7 miles per hour.
    [Show full text]