DOCSLIB.ORG

Section 9.11: Village of Fort Plain

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Section 9.11: Village of Fort Plain Section 9.11: Village of Fort Plain 9.11 Village of Fort Plain This section presents the jurisdictional annex for the Village of Fort Plain. 9.11.1 Hazard Mitigation Plan Point of Contact The following individuals have been identified as the hazard mitigation plan’s primary and alternate points of contact. Primary Point of Contact Alternate Point of Contact George Capece, Jr., Superintendent of Public Works Barry Vickers, Code Enforcement 168 Canal Street, Fort Plain, NY 13339 168 Canal Street, Fort Plain, NY 13339 Phone: (518) 993-4271 Phone: (518) 993-4271 E-mail:[email protected] or E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] 9.11.2 Municipal Profile This section provides a summary of the community. Population According to the U.S. Census, the 2010 population for the Village of Fort Plain was 2,322; of which, 369 were citizens over the age of 65. That encompasses 15.9 percent of the population. Location The Village of Fort Plain is located within the borders of the Town of Minden in the western portion of Montgomery County. It shares its boundaries with the Villages of Minden and Palatine to the north, Village of Nelliston to the east, Villages of Minden and Canajoharie to the south and the Village of Minden to the west. Brief History The Village of Fort Plain is built on the site of a Revolutionary War fort. The fort was constructed in 1776 and a blockhouse was maintained here throughout the war. The Village of Fort Plain became an incorporated village in 1823. The opening of the Erie Canal was an economic boon. It became a center of manufacturing during the nineteenth century for textiles and furniture for the Village. Governing Body Format The Village of Fort Plain is governed by the Village Board, consisting of four trustees and the mayor. This governing body will be responsible for the adoption and implementation of this plan. Growth/Development Trends The Village is fully developed at this point, with no further substantial development envisioned. 9.11.3 Natural Hazard Event History Specific to the Municipality Montgomery County has a history of natural and non-natural hazard events as detailed in Volume I, Section 5.0 of this plan. A summary of historical events is provided in each of the hazard profiles and includes a chronology of events that have affected the County and its municipalities. The table below presents a summary of natural events that have occurred to indicate the range and impact of natural hazard events in the DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update – Montgomery County, New York 9.11-1 June 2016 Section 9.11: Village of Fort Plain community. Information regarding specific damages is included if available based on reference material or local sources. Table 9.11-1. Hazard Event History FEMA Declaration # County Dates of Event Event Type (If Applicable) Designated? Summary of Damages/Losses The Otsquago Creek was seven feet higher than its previously recorded high mark. This led to flooding that caused stream bank failure along sections of the Otsquago and Canajoharie Creeks, as well as along Lasselville Road in St. Johnsville. Over 100 homes and June 26 – July 10, Severe Storms and DR-1429 Yes numerous businesses in the Village of 2013 Flooding Fort Plain along the Otsquago Creek were inundated by floodwaters, which undermined building foundations, destroyed belongings, and in some cases washed entire structures away. Many businesses in the Village of Fort Plain were entirely destroyed Notes: EM Emergency Declaration (FEMA) FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency DR Major Disaster Declaration (FEMA) IA Individual Assistance N/A Not Applicable PA Public Assistance 9.11.4 Hazard Vulnerabilities and Ranking The hazard profiles in Section 5.0 of this plan have detailed information regarding each plan participant’s vulnerability to the identified hazards. The following summarizes the hazard vulnerabilities and their ranking in the Village of Fort Plain. For additional vulnerability information relevant to this jurisdiction, refer to Section 5.0. Hazard Risk/Vulnerability Risk Ranking The table below summarizes the hazard risk/vulnerability rankings of potential hazards for Village of Fort Plain. Table 9.11-2. Hazard Risk/Vulnerability Risk Ranking Risk Ranking Estimate of Potential Dollar Losses Score to Structures Vulnerable to the Probability of (Probability Hazard Hazard type Hazarda,c Occurrence x Impact) Rankingb Drought Damage estimate not available Occasional 26 Medium 500-Year MRP: $747,230 Earthquake Rare 12 Low 2,500-Year MRP $7,209,302 Extreme Temperature Damage estimate not available Frequent 18 Medium Flood 1% Annual Chance: $448,000 Frequent 18 High Severe Storm 500-Year MRP: $92,230 Frequent 48 High DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update – Montgomery County, New York 9.11-2 June 2016 Section 9.11: Village of Fort Plain Risk Ranking Estimate of Potential Dollar Losses Score to Structures Vulnerable to the Probability of (Probability Hazard Hazard type Hazarda,c Occurrence x Impact) Rankingb 1% GBS: $1,389,760 Severe Winter Storm Frequent 51 High 5% GBS: $6,948,800 Notes: a. The general building stock valuation is based on the custom inventory generated for the municipality and based on improved value. b. High = Total hazard priority risk ranking score of 31 and above Medium = Total hazard priority risk ranking of 20-30+ Low = Total hazard risk ranking below 20 c. Loss estimates for the severe winter storm hazard is structural values only and do not include the value of contents. Loss estimates for the flood and earthquake hazards represent both structure and contents. National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Summary The following table summarizes the NFIP statistics for the municipality. Table 9.11-3. NFIP Summary # Rep. # Severe # Policies in # Policies # Claims Total Loss Loss Rep. Loss 100-Year Municipality (1) (Losses) (1) Payments (2) Prop. (1) Prop. (1) Boundary (3) Village of Fort 60 46 $2,042,214.74 4 0 47 Plain Source: FEMA Region 2, 2013 (1) Policies, claims, repetitive loss and severe repetitive loss statistics provided by FEMA Region 2, and are current as of May 31, 2013. Please note the total number of repetitive loss properties includes the severe repetitive loss properties. The number of claims represents claims closed by 5/31/2013. (2) Total building and content losses from the claims file provided by FEMA Region 2. (3) The policies inside and outside of the flood zones is based on the latitude and longitude provided by FEMA Region 2 in the policy file. Notes: FEMA noted that where there is more than one entry for a property, there may be more than one policy in force or more than one GIS possibility. A zero percentage denotes less than 1/100th percentage and not zero damages or vulnerability as may be the case. Critical Facilities The table below presents HAZUS-MH estimates of the damage and loss of use to critical facilities in the community as a result of a 1- and 0.2-percent annual chance flood events. Table 9.11-4. Potential Flood Losses to Critical Facilities Potential Loss from Exposure 1% Flood Event Percent Percent Days to Structure Content 100- Name Municipality Type 1% Event Damage Damage Percent(2) Police Fort Plain Police Hdqrs Fort Plain, Village of X 14 64 630 Station Highway RTE 80 Fort Plain, Village of X - - - Bridge Highway 90IX Fort Plain, Village of X - - - Bridge Willett Street Sewer Pump Fort Plain, Village of WW Pump X 40 NA NF Station Fort Plain Fire Dept Fort Plain, Village of Fire Station X 11 70 - Source: HAZUS-MH 2.1 DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update – Montgomery County, New York 9.11-3 June 2016 Section 9.11: Village of Fort Plain Note: NP = Not provided by HAZUS x = Facility located within the DFIRM boundary. - = No loss calculated by HAZUS NA = Not calculated in HAZUS NF =HAZUS estimate the facility will not be functional WW Pump – Wastewater Pump Station WWTP – Wastewater Treatment Plant Please note it is assumed the wells have electrical equipment and openings are three-feet above grade. (1) HAZUS-MH 2.1 provides a general indication of the maximum restoration time for 100% operations. Clearly, a great deal of effort is needed to quickly restore essential facilities to full functionality; therefore this will be an indication of the maximum downtime (HAZUS-MH 2.1 User Manual). (2) In some cases, a facility may be located in the DFIRM flood hazard boundary; however HAZUS did not calculate potential loss. This may be because the depth of flooding does not amount to any damages to the structure according to the depth damage function used in HAZUS for that facility type. (3) Dams located in the floodplain are not listed in the table above. HAZUS does not calculate potential losses to a dam as a result of a flood event. Other Vulnerabilities Identified by Municipality Montgomery County was selected to participate in the statewide competitive program, New York Rising Community Reconstruction Program. Projects addressing flooding vulnerabilities of infrastructure, natural resources, private and public properties, and the recovery of commerce in the Village of Fort Plain were identified. Issues and concerns of this nature were also addressed specifically by the Village of Fort Plain in Letters of Intent (LOI) submitted for the FEMA Hazard Mitigation Grant Program. Action Worksheets located at the end of this annex provide detail on the projects. 9.11.5 Capability Assessment This section identifies the following capabilities of the local jurisdiction: Planning and regulatory capability Administrative and technical capability Fiscal capability Community classification NFIP Integration of mitigation planning into existing and future planning mechanisms Planning and Regulatory Capability The table below summarizes the regulatory tools that are available to the municipality.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mohawk River Watershed – HUC-12
    ID Number Name of Mohawk Watershed 1 Switz Kill 2 Flat Creek 3 Headwaters West Creek 4 Kayaderosseras Creek 5 Little Schoharie Creek 6 Headwaters Mohawk River 7 Headwaters Cayadutta Creek 8 Lansing Kill 9 North Creek 10 Little West Kill 11 Irish Creek 12 Auries Creek 13 Panther Creek 14 Hinckley Reservoir 15 Nowadaga Creek 16 Wheelers Creek 17 Middle Canajoharie Creek 18 Honnedaga 19 Roberts Creek 20 Headwaters Otsquago Creek 21 Mill Creek 22 Lewis Creek 23 Upper East Canada Creek 24 Shakers Creek 25 King Creek 26 Crane Creek 27 South Chuctanunda Creek 28 Middle Sprite Creek 29 Crum Creek 30 Upper Canajoharie Creek 31 Manor Kill 32 Vly Brook 33 West Kill 34 Headwaters Batavia Kill 35 Headwaters Flat Creek 36 Sterling Creek 37 Lower Ninemile Creek 38 Moyer Creek 39 Sixmile Creek 40 Cincinnati Creek 41 Reall Creek 42 Fourmile Brook 43 Poentic Kill 44 Wilsey Creek 45 Lower East Canada Creek 46 Middle Ninemile Creek 47 Gooseberry Creek 48 Mother Creek 49 Mud Creek 50 North Chuctanunda Creek 51 Wharton Hollow Creek 52 Wells Creek 53 Sandsea Kill 54 Middle East Canada Creek 55 Beaver Brook 56 Ferguson Creek 57 West Creek 58 Fort Plain 59 Ox Kill 60 Huntersfield Creek 61 Platter Kill 62 Headwaters Oriskany Creek 63 West Kill 64 Headwaters South Branch West Canada Creek 65 Fly Creek 66 Headwaters Alplaus Kill 67 Punch Kill 68 Schenevus Creek 69 Deans Creek 70 Evas Kill 71 Cripplebush Creek 72 Zimmerman Creek 73 Big Brook 74 North Creek 75 Upper Ninemile Creek 76 Yatesville Creek 77 Concklin Brook 78 Peck Lake-Caroga Creek 79 Metcalf Brook 80 Indian
    [Show full text]
  • NYS Disaster Preparedness Commission
    New York State Disaster Preparedness Commission 2013 Annual Report Prepared by the NYS Division of Homeland Security & Emergency Services Office of Emergency Management March 31, 2014 Andrew M. Cuomo Governor Jerome M. Hauer Chairman TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 HIGHLIGHTS OF ACTIVITIES ........................................................................................................................... 3 February 8–9: Winter Storm “Nemo” ....................................................................................................... 3 June-July: Severe Weather / Repetitive Storms ....................................................................................... 6 PROGRAM STATUS ...................................................................................................................................... 12 Grant Administration .............................................................................................................................. 12 Operations .............................................................................................................................................. 13 Incident Management Team Program ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Post Office Box 1130, Cooperstown, NY 13326 · Tel: 607 547 8881 · Fax
    The Honorable Andrew M. Cuomo Governor of New York State NYS State Capitol Building Albany, NY 12224 Joseph Martens, Commissioner Dr. Howard Zucker, Acting Commissioner NYS Department of Conservation NYS Department of Health 625 Broadway Corning Tower, Empire State Plaza Albany, NY 12233-1011 Albany, NY 12237 March 24, 2015 RE: Brookman Corners Compressor Station Dear Governor Cuomo, DEC Commissioner Martens, and DOH Acting Commissioner Zucker: Otsego 2000 is extremely concerned with plans by Dominion Transmission Inc. (DTI) to expand its Brookman Corners compressor station in Montgomery County, which would expose families and children in the vicinity to high levels of pollutants dangerous to human health. (FERC Docket #CP14-497-000) Please see the attached information that we provided to NYS-DEC project manager, Chris Hogan, in a meeting with him and his staff on March 19, 2015. During that meeting we discussed errors and misrepresentations by DTI, including erroneous air dispersion modeling which neglects impacts to the Otsquago Valley and village of Fort Plain. However we also recommended several design and development improvements, described herein, that could significantly reduce those emission levels and other impacts to the valley, including Otsquago Creek. Otsego 2000 maintains that this relevant and factual information should be reviewed before agencies consider air and water resource permits for this project. Respectfully, our objective is to encourage dialogue and avoid circumstances that often result in litigation, resentment of industry, and disillusion with government agencies entrusted to protect the public. Our organization seeks to achieve positive solutions whenever possible, so we urge your active support and involvement to facilitate a better outcome in these proceedings.
    [Show full text]
  • Freeze-Up Ice Jams
    ICE JAM REFERENCE AND TROUBLE SPOTS Ice Jam Reference Ice jams cause localized flooding and can quickly cause serious problems in the NWS Albany Hydrologic Service Area (HSA). Rapid rises behind the jams can lead to temporary lakes and flooding of homes and roads along rivers. A sudden release of a jam can lead to flash flooding below with the addition of large pieces of ice in the wall of water which will damage or destroy most things in its path. Ice jams are of two forms: Freeze up and Break up. Freeze up jams usually occur early to mid winter during extremely cold weather. Break up jams usually occur mid to late winter with thaws. NWS Albany Freeze Up Jam Criteria: Three Consecutive Days with daily average temperatures <= 0°F NWS Albany Break Up Jam Criteria: 1) Ice around 1 foot thick or more? And 2) Daily Average Temperature forecast to be >= 42°F or more? Daily Average Temperature = (Tmax+Tmin)/2 Rainfall/snowmelt with a thaw will enhance the potential for break up jams as rising water helps to lift and break up the ice. A very short thaw with little or no rain/snowmelt may not be enough to break up thick ice. ** River forecasts found at: http://water.weather.gov/ahps2/forecasts.php?wfo=aly will not take into account the effect of ice. ** Ice jams usually form in preferred locations in the NWS Albany HSA. See the “Ice Jam Trouble Spots” below for a list of locations where ice jams frequently occur. Ice Jam Trouble Spots **This is not an all inclusive list, but rather a list of locations where ice jams have been reported in the past.
    [Show full text]
  • Day Life Site List Press 2017 FINAL Copy
    Day in the Life Sites and Partners For 10/12/17 Borough/County River Site School Partner Time at Site Organization Staten Island Fort Wadsworth St. Clare School National Park 10-12 Service Staten Island Austen House Curtis High NYU Wallerstein 9-1:30 School Collaborative Brooklyn Kaiser Park Seth Low IS 96 City Parks 10-11:30 Foundation 11:45-1:30 Brooklyn Floyd Bennett Field Edward R. NYSDEC 9:30-12:30 Murrow HS Brooklyn Bay Ridge Veteran’s International 10:30-2 Memorial Park School of Brooklyn Brooklyn Bush Terminal Park Sunset Park HS Billion Oyster 9-11 Project 1-3 Brooklyn Valentino Pier, Red The Brooklyn 8:30-1:30 Hook New School/PS 146 Brooklyn Valentino Pier, Red JHS 223 NYSDEC 3:15-4:15 Hook Brooklyn Brooklyn Bridge Park Brooklyn Friends 9-11 School Brooklyn Brooklyn Bridge Park St. Francis Brooklyn Bridge 4-5:30 College Park Conservancy Brooklyn Coney Island Pier Andries Hudde 10:30-12:30 JHS Queens Bayswater Park, Queens Rockaways 10:30-1:30 Rockaways Alternative Waterfront Alliance Learning Center Queens Francis Lewis Park International HS NYSDEC 10-1 for Health Sciences Queens Fort Totten Park John Bowne HS NYC Queens Urban 10-1 Park Rangers/NYSDEC Queens Newtown Creek HarborLAB 10-3 Queens Pier 1, Hunter's Point Hunters Point NYC Department of 9-2 State Park Community Environmental Middle School Protection Day in the Life Sites and Partners For 10/12/17 Queens Gantry Plaza State Park PS IS 78Q 9-1:30 Bronx Ferry Point Park West Bronx NYSDEC 12-2 Academy for the Future Bronx Ferry Point Park Renaissance HS NYSDEC 9:30-11:30
    [Show full text]
  • Montgomery County Countywide Resiliency Plan
    NYRCR MONTGOMERY COUNTY NY RISING COUNTYWIDE RESILIENCY PLAN July 2014 NY Rising Community Reconstruction Program This page intentionally left blank Montgomery County NYRCR Planning Committee Name Position Group/Organization Dustin Swanger Co-Chair Fulton-Montgomery Community College Denis Wilson Co-Chair Fulmont Community Action Agency Ann Black Member Fulmont Community Action Agency Paul Clayburn Member Montgomery County Department of Public Works American Red Cross, Northeastern New York Region, Angelika Klapputh Member Albany, NY Michael McMahon Member Montgomery County Department of Social Services Corey Nellis Member Montgomery County Soil and Water Conservation District Matt Ossenfort Member Montgomery County Executive Office Frederick Quist Member United Way of Montgomery County Nancy Ryan Member Fort Plain Reformed Church Jeffery Smith Member Montgomery County Emergency Management Office PREPARED BY This document was developed by the NYRCR Montgomery County Planning Committee as part of the NY Rising Community Reconstruction (NYRCR) Program and is supported by the NYS Department of State. The document was prepared by the following Consultant Team: AKRF, Inc.; Nagle, Tatich, Cranston LLC d/b/a Elan.3.Consulting (E.3); MJ Engineering and Land Surveying, PC; and CDM Smith, Inc. i This page intentionally left blank Foreword Introduction Flooding from severe summer storms in 2013 inflicted damages in five upstate counties, bringing home the reality that it no longer takes a hurricane or tropical storm for raging flood waters to wreak havoc in our communities. Those summer storms – as well as Superstorm Sandy, Hurricane Irene, and Tropical Storm Lee – signal that we need to rebuild our com- munities in a way that will mitigate against future risks and build increased resilience.
    [Show full text]
  • Pesticides in Surface Waters of the Hudson River Basin, New York and Adjacent States
    Pesticides in Surface Waters of the Hudson River Basin, New York and Adjacent States Introduction and Basin percent of the basin is forested land, 14 supply and the ecological health of streams. percent agricultural, and 8 percent is urban/ This fact sheet summarizes results of a study Description residential land. Water samples collected from of pesticides in surface waters of the Hudson streams and rivers in the Hudson River Basin River Basin. The National Water Quality Assessment in 1994 were analyzed for a broad suite of (NAWQA) program is designed to describe pesticides, which included herbicides and the status and trends in the water quality of insecticides. Herbicides are used to control Pesticide Sampling large representative parts of the Nation's weeds in agricultural fields as well as lawns, surface-water and ground-water resources and commercial land, and other open areas in to provide a scientific understanding of the urban and residential settings. Insecticides are Water samples were collected from a major natural and human factors that affect used to control insects in agricultural and basinwide network of 46 sites on 42 streams the quality of these resources. The Hudson urban settings. Because some pesticides can and rivers (fig. 1) during base-flow conditions River Basin, one of 60 NAWQA project areas, migrate from applied areas to streams and from late May through late June 1994, when encompasses 13,400 mi2 (square miles) in rivers, monitoring surface water for pesticides pesticides are commonly applied to fields. New
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Water Systems in the Headwaters: a Preliminary Surface Survey
    Industrial Water Systems in the Headwaters: A Preliminary Surface Survey Alexander R. Thomas, Ph.D. Achim Koeddermann, Ph.D. Introduction This is the first in a series of studies that examine the use of water-powered industrial technologies in the Headwaters Region of New York State. Throughout much of the nineteenth century, industrial activity in the region, as well as throughout the northeastern United States, was driven primarily (though not exclusively) by water power. This technology was well-suited to the mountainous interior of the region, and it is not surprising that the earliest industrial activity in the country occurred in New England and upstate New York. Much of the early industrial activity was oriented toward local consumption, and nearly every community—even tiny farming hamlets—contained a blacksmith shop, a saw mill, and a grist mill. Early in the region’s history, however, commodity-driven industrial activity aimed at export developed along fast-running streams suitable for water-powered technologies. The first textile mill in the United States was built in Pawtucket, Rhode Island, in 1790. In 1808, the first textile mill in New York State was built by a migrant from Rhode Island in New York Mills, a village on the east bank of Sauquoit Creek near present-day Utica. Within 50 years, Sauquoit Creek, with its 1,000-plus foot drop in just 17 miles, became among the most heavily industrial corridors in the world, with dozens of millponds, races, and factories lining both sides of the creek. The current study reports on an initial survey of water-industry sites conducted by research fellows during the spring of 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Flood Risk in a Changing Climate in the Mohawk and Hudson River Basins
    Final Report- Assessing Flood Risk in a Changing Climate in the Mohawk and Hudson River Basins Stephen Shaw SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY The report is divided into five different sections: 1. Hudson River – Controls on Peak River Stage 2. Causative Processes of Flooding on Tributaries to the Main Stem of the Hudson and Mohawk 3. Controls on Precipitation Intensity in the U.S. and Hudson Valley 4. Ice Jams on the Mohawk River – A simple model to predict future ice jams 5. Fact Sheet for Public: “Mohawk River Flooding: Will the future differ from the past?” The first four sections reflect basic research that has gone into better understanding processes that dictate discharge and stage on the Hudson , Mohawk, and tributaries. Work from Sections 3 and 4 (precipitation intensity and ice jams) is ongoing. We plan to have publications on these two topics complete by the end of the spring. Work on Sections 1 and 2 is complete and provides some helpful conclusions that can provide insight into predicting potential future flooding. Section 5 includes a draft fact sheet that draws from the basic research of Sections 1 to 4. The fact sheet is not a summary of the basic research, but it instead borrows bits and pieces of the basic research to make points as necessary. We are happy to incorporate any suggested revisions into this document as we presume it will be the deliverable from this project most suitable for distributing to the general public or policy makers. Section 1 – Controls on Peak River Stage in the Hudson Unlike many rivers, the main channel of the Hudson River up to Albany has a very low channel slope and is sometimes likened to being similar to a fjord.
    [Show full text]
  • NY State Highway Bridge Data: August 31, 2021
    NY State Highway Bridge Data: August 31, 2021 Montgomery County Year Date BIN Built or of Last Poor Region County Municipality Location Feature Carried Feature Crossed Owner Replaced Inspectio Status n N 02 Montgome Ames (Village) 1007920 2.2 MI S JCT RTS 163 & 10 10 10 25031013 BRIMSTONE CREEK NYSDOT 1994 10/28/2020 ry N 02 Montgome Amsterdam (City) 1090340 .1MI.NW JCT.RT30&MOHAWK R 5 5 25122020 CHUCTANUNDA CREEK NYSDOT 1971 08/01/2019 ry N 02 Montgome Amsterdam (City) 1068860 0.3 MI NE JCT RT30&MOHK R 5 5 25122419 CHUCTANUNDA CREEK NYSDOT 1979 10/22/2019 ry N 02 Montgome Amsterdam (City) 1002950 0.9 MI W JCT RTS 5S & 30 5S 5S25032001 FLORIDA AVENUE NYSDOT 1956 07/20/2020 ry Y 02 Montgome Amsterdam (City) 1002960 1.0 MI W JCT RTS 5S & 160 5S 5S25032010 30 2504 2004 Southbound NYSDOT 1960 09/24/2020 ry N 02 Montgome Amsterdam (City) 1021080 .6 MI N JCT SH 5S & SH 3 30 30 2502R200 MINAVILLE STREET NYSDOT 1960 09/24/2020 ry Y 02 Montgome Amsterdam (City) 1021079 .5 MI N JCT SH 5S & SH 30 30 30 25042008 CLEVELAND AVENUE NYSDOT 1960 11/30/2020 ry N 02 Montgome Amsterdam (City) 4425059 0.2 MI S JCT RTS 5 & 30 30 30 25042009 E.W.ARTERIAL NYSDOT 1973 12/12/2019 ry N 02 Montgome Amsterdam (City) 442505A 02MI S JCT RTS 5+30 30 30 25042011 E W ARTERIAL NYSDOT 1973 11/25/2019 ry N 02 Montgome Amsterdam (City) 1051890 JCT OF RTS 67+30 30 30 25042014 67 67 25022024 NYSDOT 1969 12/17/2019 ry N 02 Montgome Amsterdam (City) 442505B 02MI S JCT RTS 5+30 30 X E W ARTERIAL NYSDOT 1973 11/25/2019 ry N 02 Montgome Amsterdam (City) 1051910 JCT OF SH 30 & SH
    [Show full text]
  • Characterizing the Waters of 6 Rivers in Upstate New York with a Focus
    Union College Union | Digital Works Honors Theses Student Work 6-2019 Characterizing the Waters of 6 Rivers in Upstate New York With a Focus on Physical Hydrology and Controls on Water Quality Connor Horan Union College - Schenectady, NY Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons, and the Fresh Water Studies Commons Recommended Citation Horan, Connor, "Characterizing the Waters of 6 Rivers in Upstate New York With a Focus on Physical Hydrology and Controls on Water Quality" (2019). Honors Theses. 2303. https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses/2303 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at Union | Digital Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Union | Digital Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Characterizing the Waters of Six Rivers in Upstate New York With a Focus on Physical Hydrologic Controls on Water Quality By: Connor Horan Table of Contents ABSTRACT: ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................................................. 4 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................... 5 GEOLOGY ........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • In Defense of the Facts an Ongoing Search for Fort Plank
    -1- IN DEFENSE OF THE FACTS AN ONGOING SEARCH FOR FORT PLANK Since the initial publication of the "The Bloodied Mohawk" a plethora of new data has been collected. All reviews of the tome, with the exception of two - by the same critic, the first dated November of 2001 and the second written in August of 2010 , have been positive. However, his criticisms have led the author to carefully reexamine his own work, and after much consideration the author has found a need to arise "In Defense of the Facts" in "An Ongoing Search For Fort Plank". Over the succeeding 225+ years since its construction in 1778, Revolutionary War historians have stated multiple locations for Fort Plank [see “Fort Plank’s Stated Locations”]. William W. Campbell (1806-1881) is the first known non-contemporary to have stated a location for Fort Plank:1 Sir John Johnson settled at Fox’s Mills. about eight miles above Fort Plank, (or as it now called Fort Plain), and two miles below the upper Mohawk castle. Campbell was later quoted by Colonel William L. Stone (1792-1844); who, when writing his Life of Brant, employed Thomas Sammons,2 a Tryon County militiaman who had taken part in the defense of Fort Plank on August 2, 1780 to review the truth and veracity of William W. Campbell’s, The Annals of Tryon County.3 And thus the controversy began. It seems quite remarkable that Stone not only copied Campbell’s statement concerning the location of Fort Plank, but universally accepted it as true, despite his independent review of the facts.
    [Show full text]