DOCSLIB.ORG

Poverty and Our Social Order: Implications and Reservations Author(S): James H

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Poverty and Our Social Order: Implications and Reservations Author(S): James H Agricultural & Applied Economics Association Poverty and Our Social Order: Implications and Reservations Author(s): James H. Copp Source: American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 52, No. 5, Proceedings Issue (Dec., 1970), pp. 736-744 Published by: Oxford University Press on behalf of the Agricultural & Applied Economics Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1237692 . Accessed: 29/03/2013 12:15 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Agricultural & Applied Economics Association and Oxford University Press are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to American Journal of Agricultural Economics. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 152.14.176.89 on Fri, 29 Mar 2013 12:15:25 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions RURAL POVERTY-PROBLEMS AND PROGRAMS PROGRAMORGANIZER: WILLIAM C. MOTES, ECONOMICRESEARCH SERVICE, USDA Poverty and Our Social Order: Implications and Reservations* JAMESH. CoPP A FTERsix years of war on poverty, the out- quality.1 The bases of stratification may vary, come remains indecisive. We know where but stratification is found in socialist societies no the enemy is (although we continue to less than in ours. Although there is much debate find new sanctuaries) and we know his numbers about the bases of social stratification in Ameri- (although these numbers are always changing). can society, and the various strata are indistinct, We have appropriated funds, mobilized the there is common agreementthat these strata may troops, and laid down a barrage of programs.We be indexed by such characteristicsas income, ed- have devised some grand strategies and we have ucation, occupation, ethnicity (including race), won a few skirmishes. We have had many fine and life styles. Because these indicators are mod- reports from the field and victory has seemed erately intercorrelated,those at a given relative within our grasp. Yet, the war on poverty has be- position on one indicator tend to be at the same come stalemated and the early optimism moder- relative position on others. For example, those ated. What went wrong? who are low in income tend to be disadvantaged I propose that we retrace our steps and look at in educational attainment, occupational status, the origins of poverty within our society. Perhaps ethnic background, and life styles (identified by there are some structural clues in our social and some as the "culture of poverty"). Thus, when economic systems that throw light on the poverty we talk about poverty in rural America, we are problem and on our human dilemma in trying to talking about those who are at the bottom of the do something about it. Among the points I would heap, the have-nots, and those who don't have like to examine are these: (1) our failure to con- much more-the lower class. ceptualize poverty in terms of social stratifica- When we talk about eliminating poverty, we tion; (2) our failure to recognize that American are talking about eliminating or moving up those society is based to an important degree on ine- who are at the bottom of the stratification sys- quality; (3) our unwillingness to face up to cer- tem, those below some cutting point.2 However, tain basic premises of our free enterprisesystem; if we miraculously succeeded in doing this, the (4) our failure to get overwhelmingcommitment strata immediately above, though better off ma- to the war on poverty from the body politic; and terially, would become the new lower class and a (5) our unwillingnessto admit the true nature of potential focus for concern. Eliminating those our national priorities. Consideration of these who are presently poor will not eliminate a lower points certainly will not solve our problem, but class and the associated phenomena of depreca- facing up to realities may be helpful if we really tion and disparagement from the stratification want to do something about rural poverty. system. But much more important, in our con- Poverty and Social Stratification 'This apt descriptive term is taken from the title of Celia S. Heller's book [6]. All societies are stratified into various levels of 'In this paper conventional operational definitions of power, wealth, and prestige. No society has been poverty (e.g., Orshansky) are taken as the point of de- able to escape a system of structured social ine- parture, although, in my opinion, they err on the con- servative side. The amount of research and administra- *This paper expresses the views of the writer on the tive energy devoted to haggling over cutting points and questions considered and does not necessarily reflect the estimating the number of the poor is appalling. This en- official position of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. terprise, although important, has received disproportion- Special acknowledgment is due William B. Back, Helen ate attention and is an excellent example of goal dis- W. Johnson, and Robert B. Glasgow, Economic Develop- placement from the ultimate objective of doing some- ment Division, ERS, for criticism and suggestions regard- thing about the poor to the particulars of estimating the ing certain sections of the paper. service load. Much of the reported progress in the war on poverty may have been accomplished through up- JAMES H. CoPP is chief of the Human Resources dating estimates utilizing cutting points rendered ob- Branch, Economic Research Service, USDA. solete by secular trends. 736 This content downloaded from 152.14.176.89 on Fri, 29 Mar 2013 12:15:25 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions POVERTY AND OUR SOCIAL ORDER / 737 cern for those who are presently poor we have ologists have opportunisticallytaken the problem virtually ignored the possibilities of reducing the as defined by policy makers and granters of re- chances of the nonpoor becoming poor.3 search funds. Therefore, when we talk about poverty, we are I maintain that if we want to understand pov- talking about our stratification system; we are erty we must begin by looking at the American talking about an established system of organizing stratification system. How, in reality, is political political, economic, and social inequality. To un- power distributed?How, in reality, are control of derstand poverty we must examine the nature of property, access to jobs, and distribution of re- our stratification system-the mechanisms wards allocated? How, in reality, do we socially whereby some people are arrayed at the top, oth- evaluate the worth and desirability of people? ers at the middle, and still others at the bottom. Let us look at our institutions. Let us look at our To alter the condition of those in poverty is to notions of property, government,and welfare. Let alter the functioning of our society. Furthermore, us look at our basic notions about human nature, a genuine war on poverty involves fundamental human potentialities, individual achievement, changes in the organization of our society. I and free will. Let us look at the ways the prod- don't think we have been looking at the poverty ucts and rewards of our economy are distributed. problem in this way. We have been trying to Let us look at our notions of social worth. In change people in the lowest ranks, rather than brief, I am arguing that poverty is a logical out- change the basic mechanics of the ranking sys- come of our social order. I am arguing that our tem. Our social programs are designed to adjust social order is premised on inequality, discrimi- poor people, rather than the conditions that nation, and the preservation of privileges. I say make people poor. this not in criticism of our social order but as a Part of our deficiencies in conceptualization point of fact. I do not believe that any social or- and programdesign can be attributed to the state der can avoid the dilemmas of stratification. of our knowledge. As some critics of stratification However, I do believe we can profitably examine research by American sociologists have pointed our institutions and consider alternatives with out, the field is underdeveloped. Some sociolo- the goal of reducing the severity of conditions for gists have even denied that stratification exists. those at the bottom and opening up channels of The raw truth is that we don't understand the mobility so that those at the bottom, and their American stratification system. We have concen- children, and their children's children shall not trated on status and life styles rather than on the be doomed to an endless "cycle to nowhere" [5]. bases of social class [14]. In recent years, soci- Furthermore,we want to reduce the chances that ologists have been inclined to study poverty as a others, now above the poverty level, will fall into special problem rather than as a product of the the same abyss. underlying structure of our stratification system. We have studied as an individual poverty symp- Inequality in American Society tom rather than as a societal phenomenon.4Soci- 3 Equality is a common shibboleth in popular One of the gravest oversightsin the war on poverty, of American We tell school in terms of political implications,has been the neglect of discussions society. the lower middle class. They see programsdesigned to children and foreign visitors that our country is bring the lower classes closer to them.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Social-Property Relations, Class-Conflict and The
    Historical Materialism 19.4 (2011) 129–168 brill.nl/hima Social-Property Relations, Class-Conflict and the Origins of the US Civil War: Towards a New Social Interpretation* Charles Post City University of New York [email protected] Abstract The origins of the US Civil War have long been a central topic of debate among historians, both Marxist and non-Marxist. John Ashworth’s Slavery, Capitalism, and Politics in the Antebellum Republic is a major Marxian contribution to a social interpretation of the US Civil War. However, Ashworth’s claim that the War was the result of sharpening political and ideological – but not social and economic – contradictions and conflicts between slavery and capitalism rests on problematic claims about the rôle of slave-resistance in the dynamics of plantation-slavery, the attitude of Northern manufacturers, artisans, professionals and farmers toward wage-labour, and economic restructuring in the 1840s and 1850s. An alternative social explanation of the US Civil War, rooted in an analysis of the specific path to capitalist social-property relations in the US, locates the War in the growing contradiction between the social requirements of the expanded reproduction of slavery and capitalism in the two decades before the War. Keywords origins of capitalism, US Civil War, bourgeois revolutions, plantation-slavery, agrarian petty- commodity production, independent-household production, merchant-capital, industrial capital The Civil War in the United States has been a major topic of historical debate for almost over 150 years. Three factors have fuelled scholarly fascination with the causes and consequences of the War. First, the Civil War ‘cuts a bloody gash across the whole record’ of ‘the American .
    [Show full text]
  • SOCIAL STRATIFICATION and POLITICAL Behavrori an EMPHASIS \T,PON STRUCTURAL 11YNAMICS
    SOCIAL STRATIFICATION AND POLITICAL BEHAVrORI AN EMPHASIS \T,PON STRUCTURAL 11YNAMICS by Christopher Bates Doob A.B., Oberlin College, 1962 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Oberlin College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Sociology 1964 ~-,-\t ii I," - ~ <" . , Preface There are a number of people whose assistance has made this project possible. Without their aid I literally would have been unable to complete this thesis and obtain my degree. xy" profoundest acknowledgment goes to Dr. Kiyoshi Ikeda, whose knowledge of theory and methodology literally shaped this project. The influence of Professors Richard R. xy"ers, George E. Simpson, .J. Milton Yinger, and Donald P. Warwick is also evident at various points through- out this work. Mr. Thomas Bauer, Dr. Leonard Doob, Miss Nancy Durham, and Miss .June Wright have given valuable assistance at different stages of the process. Christopher B. Doob Oberlin College June 1964 09\,~O\A4 'i::l "\ ~ S iii Table of Contents Page Preface 11 r. Introduction The Problem 1 An Historical Approach to the Dynamics of Social Stratification 2 Broad Sociological Propositions Concerning Social Mobility 3 Empirical Studies 4 Status Crystallization 6 Static Structural Variables in This Study 7 Some Observations on Voting Behavior 11 The Hypotheses 12 II. Methodology The Sample 17 The Major Independent Variables 18 Intermediate Variables 25 The Dependent Variables 26 A Concluding Note 28 III. Description of the Findings The Relationship of Mobility, Class, and Intermediate Variables to Liberalism-Conservatism 30 The Intermediate Variables 31 Status Crystallization, Class, and Liberalism­ Conservatism • iv III.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Capital in India: Networks, Organizations, and Confidence
    Social Capital in India: Networks, Organizations, and Confidence Reeve Vanneman, Sonalde Desai, and James Noon University of Maryland ABSTRACT Using original data from a newly collected nationally representative survey for 40,000 households in India, we examine associations of various dimensions of social capital with each other and with contextual and individual determinants. We focus on three measures of social capital: a positional generator of social networks, a count of memberships in formal organizations, and a subjective index of confidence in institutions. All three scales show good internal reliabilities. Associations among the three are quite low however suggesting that, in India at least, there seems to be little generalization from one type of social capital to another. Further analysis reveals that all three scales reveal strong geographic patterning across India, but the social networks measure also shows strong relationships with social position within communities. Network contacts are more extensive for high caste, wealthy, and well-educated households. Similar household status associations are much weaker for confidence in institutions and for membership in organizations. These more formal, institutionalized dimensions of social capital depend more on the presence of institutions in the local area, while the more informal measures of social networks reflects also an individual’s position within the community. Prepared for the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Montreal, August 11-14, 2006. Contact: Reeve Vanneman ([email protected]). Please do not quote or cite until a final version is complete. The data are still preliminary, and the results will change somewhat once fully cleaned data are available. These results are based on the India Human Development Survey, 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Position and Fairness Views
    Social Position and Fairness Views Kristoffer Balle Hvidberg Claus Thustrup Kreiner CEBI, University of Copenhagen CEBI, University of Copenhagen Stefanie Stantcheva Harvard University November 2020 MOTIVATION Long-standing topics in Social Sciences Social status and fairness of inequality Political Econ Theory and Optimal Tax Theory Relative income and income positions important for fairness considerations and the design of tax and redistribution policy 2 42 RESEARCH QUESTIONS 1: How well do people know social positions of themselves and others? 2: To what extent do their views on (un)fairness of inequality depend on their social position? 3: How do they view fairness of inequality within different reference groups and are they better or less informed about inequality and social position where it matters the most? 3 42 UNIQUE METHODOLOGY Link Subjective & Objective Info for Large, Representative Sample of the Danish Population • Subjective: Survey & information experiment, elicitating perceptions about income positions and fairness views • Objective: Admin records with detailed info about income (on tax return), income positions, income histories, shocks (unemployment, disability, health, promotion), reference groups Conceptually: • Income: Gross income as reported on tax return and verifiable via admin data • Social position: percentile position in income distribution within your cohort (not within population) • Position within reference groups: percentile position in income distribution within cohort + same gender, education, sector, municipality, (+ neighbors, co-workers, former schoolmates, family). • Impact analysis: Effects of shocks to social position on fairness views 4 42 Social position within cohort neutralizes life-cycle effects 1000 P50 P95 800 600 400 Within cohort income (1000 DKK) 200 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 Age 5 42 SURVEY OUTLINE 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Sense of State Socialization
    Review of International Studies (2001), 27, 415–433 Copyright © British International Studies Association Making sense of state socialization KAI ALDERSON Abstract. At present, International Relations scholars use the metaphor of ‘state socializ- ation’ in mutually incompatible ways, embarking from very different starting points and arriving at a bewildering variety of destinations. There is no consensus on what state socializ- ation is, who it affects, or how it operates. This article seeks to chart this relatively unmapped concept by defining state socialization, differentiating it from similar concepts, and exploring what the study of state socialization can contribute to important and longstanding theoretical debates in the field of international relations. Introduction Norms are gaining ground in the study of International Relations.1 Not only are they the focus of extensive conceptual and theoretical work, but international norms are increasingly seen as weight-bearing elements of explanatory theories in issue- areas ranging from national security to the study of international organization.2 Regime theory continues to generate an extraordinarily fecund research pro- gramme,3 and its central insight—that relations among competitive sovereign states are shot through with norms of cooperation—links contemporary scholarship to long-standing reflections on the nature of the international.4 Constructivist scholars, for their part, argue that social norms offer a radical alternative to interest- and power-based accounts of international politics.5 1 As readily attested by the contributions to the recent fiftieth anniversary edition of International Organization, 52: 4 (1998). See, in particular, contributions by Peter J. Katzenstein, Robert O. Keohane and Stephen D. Krasner (esp.
    [Show full text]
  • Outlines of Sociology (1898; Reprint 1913)
    Lester F. Ward: Outlines of Sociology (1898; reprint 1913) [i] OUTLINES OF SOCIOLOGY - by Lester F. Ward - (1897; reprint 1913) Page 1 of 313 Lester F. Ward: Outlines of Sociology (1898; reprint 1913) [ii] Page 2 of 313 Lester F. Ward: Outlines of Sociology (1898; reprint 1913) [iii] OUTLINES OF SOCIOLOGY BY LESTER F. WARD AUTHOR OF "DYNAMIC SOCIOLOGY," "THE PSYCHIC FACTORS OF CIVILIZATION," ETC. New York THE MACMILLAN COMPANY LONDON: MACMILLAN & CO., LTD. 1913 All rights reserved Page 3 of 313 Lester F. Ward: Outlines of Sociology (1898; reprint 1913) [iv] COPYRIGHT, 1897, BY THE MACMILLAN COMPANY. --------- Set up and electrotyped January, 1898. Reprinted June, 1899; February, 1904; August, 1909; March, 1913. Norwood Press J. S. Cushing & Co. – Berwick & Smith Norwood Mass. U.S.A. Page 4 of 313 Lester F. Ward: Outlines of Sociology (1898; reprint 1913) [v] To Dr. Albion W. Small THE FIRST TO DRAW ATTENTION TO THE EDUCATIONAL VALUE OF MY SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY THE STANCH DEFENDER OF MY METHOD IN SOCIOLOGY AND TO WHOM THE PRIOR APPEARANCE OF THESE CHAPTERS IS DUE THIS WORK IS GRATEFULLY DEDICATED Page 5 of 313 Lester F. Ward: Outlines of Sociology (1898; reprint 1913) [vi] Page 6 of 313 Lester F. Ward: Outlines of Sociology (1898; reprint 1913) [vii] PREFACE This little work has been mainly the outcome of a course of lectures which I delivered at the School of Sociology of the Hartford Society for Education Extension in 1894 and 1895. They were given merely from notes in six lectures the first of these years, and expanded into twelve lectures the following year in substantially their present form.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Identity Map: a Reflexivity Tool for Practicing Explicit Positionality In
    Article International Journal of Qualitative Methods Volume 18: 1–12 ª The Author(s) 2019 Social Identity Map: A Reflexivity Tool Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions for Practicing Explicit Positionality DOI: 10.1177/1609406919870075 in Critical Qualitative Research journals.sagepub.com/home/ijq Danielle Jacobson1 and Nida Mustafa1 Abstract The way that we as researchers view and interpret our social worlds is impacted by where, when, and how we are socially located and in what society. The position from which we see the world around us impacts our research interests, how we approach the research and participants, the questions we ask, and how we interpret the data. In this article, we argue that it is not a straightforward or easy task to conceptualize and practice positionality. We have developed a Social Identity Map that researchers can use to explicitly identify and reflect on their social identity to address the difficulty that many novice critical qualitative researchers experience when trying to conceptualize their social identities and positionality. The Social Identity Map is not meant to be used as a rigid tool but rather as a flexible starting point to guide researchers to reflect and be reflexive about their social location. The map involves three tiers: the identification of social identities (Tier 1), how these positions impact our life (Tier 2), and details that may be tied to the particularities of our social identity (Tier 3). With the use of this map as a guide, we aim for researchers to be able to better identify and understand their social locations and how they may pose challenges and aspects of ease within the qualitative research process.
    [Show full text]
  • The Self-Control Consequences of Political Ideology
    The self-control consequences of political ideology Joshua J. Clarksona,1, John R. Chambersb, Edward R. Hirtc, Ashley S. Ottoa, Frank R. Kardesa, and Christopher Leoned aMarketing Department, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221; bPsychology Department, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63103; cDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405; and dPsychology Department, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224 Edited by Jonathan W. Schooler, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, and accepted by the Editorial Board May 26, 2015 (received for review February 22, 2015) Evidence from three studies reveals a critical difference in self-control This potential discrepancy in freewill beliefs is critical to the as a function of political ideology. Specifically, greater endorsement proposition that conservatives demonstrate greater self-control of political conservatism (versus liberalism) was associated with than liberals. Recent work, for instance, demonstrates that freewill greater attention regulation and task persistence. Moreover, this beliefs are intricately linked to basic motor processes critical to relationship is shown to stem from varying beliefs in freewill; effective self-control (15, 16). Indeed, discouraging a belief specifically, the association between political ideology and self- in freewill decreases activation in brain regions associated with control is mediated by differences in the extent to which belief in — — freewill is endorsed, is independent of task performance or motiva- intentional and arguably goal-directed action (i.e., readiness tion, and is reversed when freewill is perceived to impede (rather potential) (16). Similarly, the belief in freewill appears critical to than enhance) self-control. Collectively, these findings offer insight individuals’ ability to overcome the temptation to engage in self- into the self-control consequences of political ideology by detailing detrimental and antisocial behavior (6, 17, 18).
    [Show full text]
  • Latin American Middle Classes: the Distance Between Perception and Reality
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Lora, Eduardo; Fajardo, Deisy Johanna Working Paper Latin American Middle Classes: The Distance between Perception and Reality IDB Working Paper Series, No. IDB-WP-275 Provided in Cooperation with: Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), Washington, DC Suggested Citation: Lora, Eduardo; Fajardo, Deisy Johanna (2011) : Latin American Middle Classes: The Distance between Perception and Reality, IDB Working Paper Series, No. IDB- WP-275, Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), Washington, DC This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/88953 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Social Class and Styles of Living
    10 Social Class and Styles of Living The concept of social class is crucial to the analysis of society and human behaviour and therefore to any explanation of the existence and scale of poverty. Historically, the concept has played a prominent part in political and sociological theory. In cruder senses, it also plays a prominent part in public discussion of political and social events. It is recognized to be a more complex stratifying factor than, say, age or sex, and emphasis is variously given in its definition and exposition to economic position, power, social status or prestige and culture. In the survey reported in this book, we tried to obtain both objective and subjective indicators of class membership in analysing the distribution of resources. This chapter gives some account of these indicators and the results of using ‘class’ in different senses, as an analytic variable. We developed a number of operational classifications, which are discussed below. They are: 1. Individual unprompted self-assignation. 2. Individual prompted self-assignation. 3. The Registrar General’s five-fold occupational classification. 4. A sociological eight-fold classification. 5. The combined occupational class of husband and wife. 6. The combined occupational class of husband, wife, husband’s father and wife’s father. The Problem of Measurement The state’s acknowledgement of the existence of ‘social class’ might be said to date from the Census of 1911, when the Registrar General sought to grade occupations according to ‘social position’ into eight classes. These were reduced from 1921 to five classes.1 The criteria were arbitrary, and the classification has been frequently criticized.
    [Show full text]
  • Under a Middle-Class Gaze
    Chapter 5 Under a Middle-Class Gaze 5.1 Governing Inequality Capitalism harms human beings through neglect, rather than through terror. Compared to the personal will of the dictator, the structural vio- lence of the market “forces” appears benign. Those individuals or groups excluded from capitalism’s dreamworlds appear themselves to blame. The fate of the poor is social ostracism. Their gulag is the ghetto. buck-morss, 2002: 188 An important aspect of the neoliberal transformation of society is the recruitment of civil society to serve its objectives. Foucault has pointed to the central role of the new homo oeconomicus in this, a figure thought of in terms of the individual as an “entrepreneur of oneself”, maximiz- ing himself or herself as “human capital” in competition with all other individuals […] this process not only adds to the general insecuritization which the neoliberal government of conduct promotes, but it is also de- structive of social bonds and the conditions for social cohesion. This poses a severe problem for the neoliberal state, which it attempts to resolve by reconstituting racism and through war. lazzarato, 2009: 111 These two citations above disclose different structures and dimensions of in- equality, exclusion, coercion, and exploitation met in capitalist states. Susan Buck-Morss’ citation demonstrates the limits of the kind of “freedom” associ- ated with capitalism and the regimes of exclusion it creates, particularly in the absence of welfare institutions. Exclusion occurs organically, and its violence is much more abstract than the one potentially exercised by a dictator. For this reason, it can be normalised easier.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Inequality Via Social Stratification
    Entreciencias: Diálogos en la Sociedad del Conocimiento ISSN: 2007-8064 [email protected] Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México México Analysis of inequality via social stratification Rodríguez Esparza, Luz Judith; Maza Díaz Cortés, Octavio Martín; Macías Ponce, Julio César; Ortiz Lazcano, Dolly Anabel Analysis of inequality via social stratification Entreciencias: Diálogos en la Sociedad del Conocimiento, vol. 8, no. 22, 2020 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México Available in: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=457662386030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/enesl.20078064e.2020.2276859e22.76859 PDF generated from XML JATS4R by Redalyc Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative CIENCIAS SOCIALES, HUMANIDADES Y ARTES Analysis of inequality via social stratification Análisis de la desigualdad a través de la estratificación social Luz Judith Rodríguez Esparza a [email protected] National Council of Science and Technology [Conacyt], México hp://orcid.org/0000-0003-2241-1102 Octavio Martín Maza Díaz Cortés b [email protected] Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, México hp://orcid.org/0000-0002-3991-7751 Julio César Macías Ponce c [email protected] Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, México hp://orcid.org/0000-0001-5141-7074 Dolly Anabel Ortiz Lazcano d [email protected] Entreciencias: Diálogos en la Sociedad del Conocimiento, vol. 8, no. 22, 2020 Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, México Universidad Nacional Autónoma de hp://orcid.org/0000-0003-3452-3291 México, México Received: 08 September 2020 Accepted: 03 November 2020 Published: 18 November 2020 Abstract: . DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/ Purpose: To analyze the contribution that social stratification provides to inequality enesl.20078064e.2020.2276859e22.76859 using the Gini index as an input.
    [Show full text]