History Counts: a Comparative Analysis of Racial/Color Categorization in US and Brazilian Censuses

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

History Counts: a Comparative Analysis of Racial/Color Categorization in US and Brazilian Censuses Public Health Then and Now History Counts: A Comparative Analysis of Racial/Color Categorization in US and Brazilian Censuses ABSTRACT Melissa Nobles, PhD Categories of race (ethnicity, color, State officials, international organizations, sessing the contemporary production and uses or both) have appeared and continue to ap- and the general public today consider census- of racial data and, in particular, the recent de- pear in the demographic censuses of nu- taking an indispensable component of modern cision by the US Office of Management and merous countries, including the United governance. Most national census bureaus em- Budget (OMB) to allow Americans to check States and Brazil. Until recently, such cat- ploy similar statistical methods and adminis- more than one racial category. egorization had largely escaped critical trative procedures, and international guidelines scrutiny, being viewed and treated as a tech- have advanced this uniformity. Since 1946, for nical procedure requiring little conceptual example, the United Nations has sponsored 4 American Censuses: Race is clarity or historical explanation. Recent world population programs whose express pur- Fundamental political developments and methodologi- pose was to improve and standardize national cal changes, in US censuses especially, censuses.1 The race question and racial categories have engendered a critical reexamination An unavoidable consequence of this ap- have appeared in every US decennial census, of both the comparative and the historical parent uniformity and universality has been from the Republic’s first in 1790 to the 2000 dimensions of categorization. the obfuscation of the very particular dimen- census. Although the term “color” actually ap- The author presents a comparative sions of census-taking within and between peared on 19th-century census schedules, it analysis of the histories of racial/color countries. That is, while census bureaus may was synonymous with “race” in meaning. The categorization in American and Brazilian use the same statistical methods to produce nu- history of racial categorization can be divided censuses and shows that racial (and merical data, they often do not employ the same into 4 periods (see Table 1). color) categories have appeared in these categories (e.g., race, language, ethnicity) to The first period is 1790 through 1840, censuses because of shifting ideas about generate these data. Moreover, even if the same when categorization was shaped by represen- race and the enduring power of these categories are used, they usually do not bear tational apportionment, slavery, and racial ideas as organizers of political, eco- the same meanings. Indeed, the basic incon- ideas. The second period is 1850 through 1920, nomic, and social life in both countries. sistency of official categories and their mean- when categorization was used expressly to ad- These categories have not appeared sim- ings can even be observed within the census vance the racial theories of scientists. The third ply as demographic markers. The author history of one country. In American censuses, period is 1930 through 1960, when census def- demonstrates that censuses are instru- for example, census and other state officials initions of racial categories were identical to ments at a state’s disposal and are not have changed racial categories and their defi- those of Southern race laws. The fourth period simply detached registers of population nitions several times since the first census in is 1970 to the present, during which categori- and performance. (Am J Public Health. 1790 and on nearly every census since 1890. zation has been shaped most profoundly by 2000;90:1738–1745) In short, the political impulses behind cen- civil rights legislation, the implementation of sus categories vary across national settings and OMB Statistical Directive No. 15, and the lob- within national settings across time. Whether bying efforts of organized groups. Before the the terms used are “race,” “ethnicity,” “color,” introduction of self-identification on the 1960 or some combination of these depends largely census, enumerators determined the person’s on historical circumstance. What these terms race by observation on the basis of the defini- mean, to whom they apply, and how they are tions provided in official instructions. employed in public policies are most intelligi- ble in terms of specific national experiences. In this article I provide a succinct history and analysis of racial and color categorization The author is with the Department of Political Sci- in American and Brazilian demographic cen- ence, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cam- suses.2 This history clearly illustrates the fun- bridge, Mass. damental political and historical contingency of Requests for reprints should be sent to Melissa such categorization. It also shows that the pro- Nobles, PhD, Department of Political Science, Mas- sachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts duction of racial/ethnic data has served shift- Ave, E53-453, Cambridge, MA 02139 (e-mail: ing political and social purposes. Knowledge [email protected]). of this history is absolutely essential to as- This article was accepted June 30, 2000. 1738 American Journal of Public Health November 2000, Vol. 90, No. 11 the American Revolution competed, at the time, TABLE 1—US Census Race Categories, 1790–2000 with other ideas that claimed natural hierar- 1790—Free White Males; Free White Females; All Other Free Persons; Slaves chies and limitations. Further, the deepening 1800—Free White Males; Free White Females; All Other Free Persons, except Indians Not entrenchment of slavery in economic and po- Taxed; Slaves litical life rendered moot abstract commitments 1810—Free White Males; Free White Females; All Other Free Persons; except Indians Not to universal equality and liberty. Taxed; Slaves To be free and White and to be free and 1820—Free White Males; Free White Females; Free Colored Persons, All other persons, except Indians Not Taxed; Slaves Black were distinctly different political expe- 1830—Free White Persons; Free Colored Persons; Slaves riences. Whites were presumptively citizens. 1840—Free White Persons; Free Colored Persons; Slaves Although free Blacks were also citizens by a 1850—Black; Mulatto birthright, they did not enjoy the same rights 1860—Black; Mulatto; (Indian)b 1880—White; Black; Mulatto; Chinese; Indian and entitlements as Whites, precisely because 1890—White; Black; Mulatto; Quadroon; Octoroon; Chinese; Japanese; Indian Blacks were deemed inferior and unfit for re- 1900—White: Black; Chinese; Japanese; Indian publican life on the grounds of race.4,5 The cit- 1910—White; Black; Mulatto; Chinese; Japanese; Indian; Other (+ write in) izenship status of Native Americans was de- 1920—White; Black; Mulatto; Indian; Chinese; Japanese; Filipino; Hindu; Korean; Other termined by the particular status of tribes as (+ write in) 1930—White; Negro; Mexican; Indian; Chinese; Japanese; Filipino; Hindu; Korean; (Other spelled out in law and treaties. The federal gov- races, spell out in full) ernment considered most tribes “quasi- 1940—White; Negro; Indian; Chinese; Japanese; Filipino; Hindu; Korean; (Other races, sovereign nations,” thereby disqualifying their spell out in full) members from American citizenship.6 The cen- 1950—White; Negro; Indian; Japanese; Chinese; Filipino; (Other race—spell out) 1960—White; Negro; American Indian; Japanese; Chinese; Filipino; Hawaiian; sus schedules of 1800 through 1820 explicitly Part-Hawaiian; Aleut Eskimo, etc. reflected these arrangements in their category 1970—White; Negro or Black; American Indian; Japanese; Chinese; Filipino; Hawaiian; “all other free persons, except Indians Not Korean; Other (print race) Taxed.” 1980—White; Negro or Black; Japanese; Chinese; Filipino; Korean; Vietnamese; American The censuses from the years 1790 through Indian; Asian Indian; Hawaiian; Guamanian; Samoan; Eskimo; Aleut; Other (specify) 1990—White; Black or Negro; American Indian; Eskimo; Aleut; Chinese; Filipino; Hawaiian; 1840 asked few questions beyond those related Korean; Vietnamese; Japanese; Asian Indian; Samoan; Guamanian; Other API to population. They counted free White males (Asian or Pacific Islander); Other race and free White females, subdivided into age 2000—White; Black, African American, or Negro; American Indian or Alaska Native; Asian groups; free colored persons (in some years, Indian; Chinese; Filipino; Japanese; Korean; Vietnamese; Native Hawaiian; Guamanian or Chamorro; Samoan; Other Asian (Print Race); Other Pacific Islander all other free persons, except Indians not taxed); (Print Race); Some other race (Print Race) and slaves. The earliest censuses registered race, as it was then understood. Race was con- Note. Categories are presented in the order in which they appeared on schedules. sidered a natural fact, though its political and Source. US Bureau of the Census. social significance was still being sorted out. aIn 1850 and 1860, free persons were enumerated on schedules for “free inhabitants”; slaves were enumerated on schedules designated for “slave inhabitants.” On the free- To be sure, colonial racial discourse had long inhabitants schedule, instructions to enumerators read, in part: “In all cases where the regarded Africans as different from and inferior person is white leave the space blank in the column marked ‘Color.’” to the English, whatever their common hu- b Although “Indian” was not listed on the census schedule, the instructions read: manity.6Yet
Recommended publications
  • Umbanda: Africana Or Esoteric? Open Library of ­Humanities, 6(1): 25, Pp
    ARTICLE How to Cite: Engler, S 2020 Umbanda: Africana or Esoteric? Open Library of Humanities, 6(1): 25, pp. 1–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16995/olh.469 Published: 30 June 2020 Peer Review: This article has been peer reviewed through the double-blind process of Open Library of Humanities, which is a journal published by the Open Library of Humanities. Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Open Access: Open Library of Humanities is a peer-reviewed open access journal. Digital Preservation: The Open Library of Humanities and all its journals are digitally preserved in the CLOCKSS scholarly archive service. Steven Engler, ‘Umbanda: Africana or Esoteric?’ (2020) 6(1): 25 Open Library of Humanities. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.16995/olh.469 ARTICLE Umbanda: Africana or Esoteric? Steven Engler Mount Royal University, CA [email protected] Umbanda is a dynamic and varied Brazilian spirit-incorporation tradition first recorded in the early twentieth century. This article problematizes the ambiguity of categorizing Umbanda as an ‘Afro-Brazilian’ religion, given the acknowledged centrality of elements of Kardecist Spiritism. It makes a case that Umbanda is best categorized as a hybridizing Brazilian Spiritism. Though most Umbandists belong to groups with strong African influences alongside Kardecist elements, many belong to groups with few or no African elements, reflecting greater Kardecist influence.
    [Show full text]
  • Movimento Pardo-Mestiço Brasileiro (MPMB) Associação Dos Caboclos E Ribeirinhos Da Amazônia (ACRA)
    Audiência Pública sobre a Constitucionalidade de Políticas de Ação Afirmativa de Acesso ao Ensino Superior – Supremo Tribunal Federal Pol íticas P úblicas de Elimina ção da Identidade Mesti ça e Sistemas Classificat órios de Cor, Ra ça e Etnia Movimento Pardo-Mestiço Brasileiro (MPMB) Associação dos Caboclos e Ribeirinhos da Amazônia (ACRA) Helderli Fideliz Castro de Sá Leão Alves Brasília (DF), 5 de março de 2010 Excelentíssimos Senhores Ministros, As observações que faremos resultam do trato desde 2001, com idéias e práticas de políticas públicas étnicas e raciais no Brasil e em outros países. Esta atuação nos faz ter a convicção de que o Sistema de Cotas para Negros da UnB não é, a rigor, medida de ação afirmativa. MonumentoMonumento emem PortugalPortugal àà índiaíndia ParaguaçuParaguaçu ee seuseu marido,marido, oo portuguêsportuguês Caramuru.Caramuru. Políticas públicas de eliminação da identidade mestiça e sistemas classificatórios de cor, raça e etnia Ele não visa combater discriminação racial, de cor, ou de origem, nem corrigir efeitos de discriminações passadas, nem assegurar os direitos humanos e as liberdades fundamentais de grupos étnicos e raciais, como exige a Convenção Internacional Sobre a Eliminação de Todas as Formas de Discriminação Racial para distinguir uma medida especial de uma medida de discriminação MestiçosMestiços manifestam-semanifestam-se contracontra racial. imposiçãoimposição dada identidadeidentidade negranegra aa pardospardos nana II ConferênciaConferência EstadualEstadual dede PolíticasPolíticas dede PromoçãoPromoção
    [Show full text]
  • Can Money Whiten? Exploring Race Practice in Colonial Venezuela and Its Implications for Contemporary Race Discourse
    Michigan Journal of Race and Law Volume 3 1998 Can Money Whiten? Exploring Race Practice in Colonial Venezuela and Its Implications for Contemporary Race Discourse Estelle T. Lau State University of New York at Buffalo Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjrl Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Law and Race Commons, Law and Society Commons, and the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation Estelle T. Lau, Can Money Whiten? Exploring Race Practice in Colonial Venezuela and Its Implications for Contemporary Race Discourse, 3 MICH. J. RACE & L. 417 (1998). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjrl/vol3/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Journal of Race and Law by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CAN MONEY WHITEN? EXPLORING RACE PRACTICE IN COLONIAL VENEZUELA AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR CONTEMPORARY RACE DISCOURSE Estelle T. Lau* The Gracias al Sacar, a fascinating and seemingly inconceivable practice in eighteenth century colonial Venezuela, allowed certain individuals of mixed Black and White ancestry to purchase "Whiteness" from their King. The author exposes the irony of this system, developed in a society obsessed with "natural" ordering that labeled individuals according to their precise racial ancestry. While recognizing that the Gracias al Sacar provided opportunities for advancement and an avenue for material and social struggle, the author argues that it also justified the persistence of racial hierarchy.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Is Black, White, Or Mixed Race? How Skin Color, Status, and Nation Shape Racial Classification in Latin America1
    Who Is Black, White, or Mixed Race? How Skin Color, Status, and Nation Shape Racial Classification in Latin America1 Edward Telles Princeton University Tianna Paschel University of Chicago Comparative research on racial classification has often turned to Latin America, where race is thought to be particularly fluid. Using nationally representative data from the 2010 and 2012 America’sBa- rometer survey, the authors examine patterns of self-identification in four countries. National differences in the relation between skin color, socioeconomic status, and race were found. Skin color predicts race closely in Panama but loosely in the Dominican Republic. Moreover, de- spite the dominant belief that money whitens, the authors discover that status polarizes ðBrazilÞ, mestizoizes ðColombiaÞ, darkens ðDomin- ican RepublicÞ, or has no effect ðPanamaÞ. The results show that race is both physical and cultural, with country variations in racial schema that reflect specific historical and political trajectories. Throughout the Americas, the idea of race has commonly been used to make social distinctions, especially regarding persons of African origin. 1 We thank the Ford Foundation for funding the ethnicity module of the America’s Barometer through the Project on Ethnicity and Race in Latin America ðPERLAÞ as well as the Latin American Public Opinion Project ðLAPOPÞ and its major supporters ðthe U.S. Agency for International Development, the United Nations Development Program, the Inter-American Development Bank, and Vanderbilt UniversityÞ. We also thank Scott Lynch, René Flores, Jennifer Jones, Andreas Wimmer, Denia Garcia, and the AJS reviewers for their feedback. Direct correspondence to Edward Telles, Depart- © 2015 by The University of Chicago.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Origins of the One-Drop Racial Rule in the United States
    Historical Origins of the One-Drop Racial Rule in the United States Winthrop D. Jordan1 Edited by Paul Spickard2 Editor’s Note Winthrop Jordan was one of the most honored US historians of the second half of the twentieth century. His subjects were race, gender, sex, slavery, and religion, and he wrote almost exclusively about the early centuries of American history. One of his first published articles, “American Chiaroscuro: The Status and Definition of Mulattoes in the British Colonies” (1962), may be considered an intellectual forerunner of multiracial studies, as it described the high degree of social and sexual mixing that occurred in the early centuries between Africans and Europeans in what later became the United States, and hinted at the subtle racial positionings of mixed people in those years.3 Jordan’s first book, White over Black: American Attitudes Toward the Negro, 1550–1812, was published in 1968 at the height of the Civil Rights Movement era. The product of years of painstaking archival research, attentive to the nuances of the thousands of documents that are its sources, and written in sparkling prose, White over Black showed as no previous book had done the subtle psycho-social origins of the American racial caste system.4 It won the National Book Award, the Ralph Waldo Emerson Prize, the Bancroft Prize, the Parkman Prize, and other honors. It has never been out of print since, and it remains a staple of the graduate school curriculum for American historians and scholars of ethnic studies. In 2005, the eminent public intellectual Gerald Early, at the request of the African American magazine American Legacy, listed what he believed to be the ten most influential books on African American history.
    [Show full text]
  • Pontifícia Universidade Católica De São Paulo Puc-Sp
    PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DE SÃO PAULO PUC-SP LUÍS CLÁUDIO CARDOSO BANDEIRA “ROTAS E RAIZES” DE ANCESTRAIS ITINERANTES DOUTORADO EM HISTÓRIA SOCIAL SÃO PAULO 2013 PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DE SÃO PAULO PUC-SP LUÍS CLÁUDIO CARDOSO BANDEIRA “ROTAS E RAIZES” DE ANCESTRAIS ITINERANTES DOUTORADO EM HISTÓRIA SOCIAL Tese apresentada à Banca Examinadora da Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, como exigência parcial para obtenção do título de Doutor em História Social, sob a orientação da Profª Drª Maria Antonieta Martines Antonacci. SÃO PAULO 2013 Banca Examinadora __________________________________ __________________________________ __________________________________ __________________________________ __________________________________ Laroiê Esu ! Chegou a hora, quem lá no mato mora, é que vai agora se apresentar. No chão do terreiro a flecha do Seu Flecheiro foi que primeiro zuniu no ar. Vi Seu Aimoré, Seu Coral, vi Seu Guiné, Vi Seu Jaguará, Seu Araranguá, Tupaíba eu vi, Seu Tupã, vi Seu Tupi, Seu Tupiraci, Seu Tupinambá. Vi Seu Pedra-Preta se anunciar, Seu Rompe-Mato, Seu Sete-Flechas, Vi Seu Ventania me assoviar, Seu Vence Demandas eu vi dançar,Benzeu meu patuá. Vi Seu Pena-Branca rodopiar, Seu Mata-Virgem, Seu Sete-Estrelas, Vi Seu Vira-Mundo me abençoar, Vi toda a falange do Jurema. Dentro do meu gongá. Seu Ubirajara trouxe Seu Jupiara, e Seu Tupiara pra confirmar. Linha de Caboclo, diz Seu Arranca-Toco, um é irmão do outro quem vem lá. Com berloque e jóia vi Seu Araribóia, com Seu Jibóia, beirando o mar,com cocar, borduna, chegou Seu Grajaúna,com Baraúna mandou chamar. Vi Seu Pedra-Branca se aproximar, Seu Folha-Verde, Seu Serra-Negra, Seu Sete-Pedreiras eu vi rolar, Seu Cachoeirinha ouvi cantar, Seu Girassol girar.
    [Show full text]
  • (In)Determinable: Race in Brazil and the United States
    Michigan Journal of Race and Law Volume 14 2009 Determining the (In)Determinable: Race in Brazil and the United States D. Wendy Greene Cumberland School fo Law at Samford University Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjrl Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Education Law Commons, Law and Race Commons, and the Law and Society Commons Recommended Citation D. W. Greene, Determining the (In)Determinable: Race in Brazil and the United States, 14 MICH. J. RACE & L. 143 (2009). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjrl/vol14/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Journal of Race and Law by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DETERMINING THE (IN)DETERMINABLE: RACE IN BRAZIL AND THE UNITED STATES D. Wendy Greene* In recent years, the Brazilian states of Rio de Janeiro, So Paulo, and Mato Grasso du Sol have implemented race-conscious affirmative action programs in higher education. These states established admissions quotas in public universities '' for Afro-Brazilians or afrodescendentes. As a result, determining who is "Black has become a complex yet important undertaking in Brazil. Scholars and the general public alike have claimed that the determination of Blackness in Brazil is different than in the United States; determining Blackness in the United States is allegedly a simpler task than in Brazil. In Brazil it is widely acknowledged that most Brazilians are descendants of Aficans in light of the pervasive miscegenation that occurred during and after the Portuguese and Brazilian enslavement of * Assistant Professor of Law, Cumberland School of Law at Samford University.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiracial in America Proud, Diverse and Growing in Numbers
    NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE JUNE 11, 2015 Multiracial in America Proud, Diverse and Growing in Numbers FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT: Kim Parker, Director of Social Trends Research Rich Morin, Senior Editor Juliana Menasce Horowitz, Associate Director Mark Hugo Lopez, Director of Hispanic Research Molly Rohal, Communications Manager 202.419.4372 www.pewresearch.org RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center. 2015. “Multiracial in America: Proud, Diverse and Growing in Numbers.” Washington, D.C.: June 1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER About This Report This report, produced by Pew Research Center, examines the attitudes, experiences and demographic characteristics of multiracial Americans. The findings are based on data from two primary sources: A nationally representative survey of 1,555 multiracial Americans ages 18 and older, conducted online from Feb. 6 to April 6, 2015, and Pew Research analyses of data collected by the U.S. Census Bureau. Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan “fact tank” that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. It does not take policy positions. The center conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, content analysis and other data-driven social science research. It studies U.S. politics and policy; journalism and media; internet, science and technology; religion and public life; Hispanic trends; global attitudes and trends; and U.S. social and demographic trends. All of the center’s reports are available at www.pewresearch.org. Pew Research Center is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts, its primary funder. While Pew Research Center is solely responsible for the content of this report, we received invaluable advice from Ann Morning, associate professor of Sociology at New York University; Aliya Saperstein, assistant professor of sociology at Stanford University; and Taeku Lee, professor of political science and law at the University of California, Berkeley.
    [Show full text]
  • Afro-Descendants, Discrimination and Economic Exclusion in Latin America by Margarita Sanchez and Maurice Bryan, with MRG Partners
    macro study Afro-descendants, Discrimination and Economic Exclusion in Latin America By Margarita Sanchez and Maurice Bryan, with MRG partners Executive summary Also, Afro-descendants do not have a significant voice in the This macro study addresses the economic exclusion of people planning, design or implementation of the policies and activi- of African descent (Afro-descendants) in Latin America. It ties that directly affect their lives and regions. This is an aims to examine how and why race and ethnicity contribute to important omission; while Afro-descendant populations may the disproportionately high levels of poverty and economic dis- be materially poor, they have a rich cultural heritage and access crimination in most Afro-descendant communities, and how to key natural resources. Development strategies need to recog- to promote change. nize the historical, social and cultural complexity of There are clear links between Afro-descendant communi- Afro-descendants’ poverty and consult them on the most cul- ties and poverty, however there is a need for disaggregated data turally appropriate means of achieving positive change. to provide a more precise picture, and to enable better plan- The views of Afro-descendants are central to much of the ning and financing of development programmes for this highly information used in this study, which uses a rights-based marginalized group. approach. The study explains some of the causes and conse- A prime cause for the lack of quantitative material, is that quences of Afro-descendants’ exclusion, and offers donors and governments have only recently begun to acknowl- recommendations for a more inclusive minority rights-based edge Afro-descendant populations’ existence.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.OROPHARYNGEAL DYSPHAGIA: ANALYSES OF
    Revista CEFAC ISSN: 1516-1846 [email protected] Instituto Cefac Brasil de Resende, Patrícia Dorotéia; Borges Dobelin, Juliane; Bittante de Oliveira, Iara; Fontes Luchesi, Karen OROPHARYNGEAL DYSPHAGIA: ANALYSES OF BRAZILIANS AND AMERICANS PROTOCOLS OF FLUOROSCOPY Revista CEFAC, vol. 17, núm. 5, septiembre-octubre, 2015, pp. 1610-1618 Instituto Cefac São Paulo, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=169342586026 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative 1610 OROPHARYNGEAL DYSPHAGIA: ANALYSES OF BRAZILIANS AND AMERICANS PROTOCOLS OF FLUOROSCOPY Disfagia orofaríngea neurogênica: análise de protocolos de videofluoroscopia brasileiros e norte-americanos Patrícia Dorotéia de Resende (1), Juliane Borges Dobelin (1), Iara Bittante de Oliveira (1), Karen Fontes Luchesi (2) ABSTRACT The aim of this study is to analyze and compare the use of Brazilian and North American protocols for videofluoroscopy in patients with stroke. It was conducted a literature review in Brazilian and North American articles. It were selected articles with description of procedures for videofluoroscopy of swallowing in subjects who had stroke, published between 2003 and 2013. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the procedures for videofluoroscopy was performed. It was considered the variables: positioning for the exam, consistency and quantities of the bolus, types of tools and use of protocols. Sixteen studies were included, nine (56.25%) North Americans and 7 (43.75%) Brazilians. It was observed that four of the national studies (57.14%) did not report the quantities offered, while all Americans detailed it between 2 and 15 mL; the types of food and their consistencies were detailed in all national and North American studies, but national studies did it generically, without identification of foods.
    [Show full text]
  • The Slave Population in Pernambuco, Brazil, 1560-1872: a Macrodemographic Reconstruction
    Heitor P. de Moura Filho The Slave Population in Pernambuco, Brazil, 1560-1872: A Macrodemographic Reconstruction Abstract This paper exposes a demographic model to represent the evolution of the population of African slaves brought to the province of Pernambuco, Brazil, from 1560 to 1872, including their descendants. The main conclusion at this stage of the research is the confirmation that realistic combinations of mortality and fertility parameters, in a spreadsheet-based simulation, succeed in generating populations of size and distribution by age and sex that fit with those of Brazil’s first nationwide census, in 1872. Such combinations of parameters also reinforce the thesis that the slave trade was the main motor for the growth of the slave population and its descendants in that region. Volume 2-3, No. 1 (2014-2015) | ISSN 2169-0812 (online) DOI 10.5195/jwhi.2015.8 | http://jwhi.pitt.edu The Slave Population in Pernambuco, Brazil, 1560-1872: A macrodemographic reconstruction Journal of World-Historical Information | http://jwhi.pitt.edu | DOI 10.5195/jwhi.2015.8 2 Heitor P. de Moura Filho The Slave Population in Pernambuco, Brazil, 1560-1872: A Macrodemographic Reconstruction1 This article presents a demographic model for the development of the population of African slaves brought to a province of Brazil, Pernambuco, from 1560 to 1872, including their descendants. We make use of two essential sets of historical data. The time series of African slaves disembarked in Pernambuco, researched and organized by Daniel Domingues da Silva and David Eltis (2008), constitutes the main demographic flow to influence the population of this province.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics
    Brazil in Black and White? Race Categories and the Study of Inequality Mara Loveman, University of Wisconsin, Madison Stanley R. Bailey, University of California, Irvine Jeronimo O. Muniz, Federal University of Minas Gerais 1 Brazil in Black and White? Race Categories and the Study of Inequality ABSTRACT Many scholars advocate the adoption of a black-and-white lens for analysis of racial inequality in Brazil. Drawing on a nationally representative dataset that includes race questions in multiple formats, we evaluate how removal of the ‗brown‘ category from social surveys would likely affect (1) the descriptive picture of Brazil‘s racial composition, and (2) estimates of income inequality between and within racial groups. We find that a forced binary question format results in a whiter and more racially unequal picture of Brazil through the movement of many higher income mixed-race respondents into the white category. We also find that regardless of question format, racial inequality in income accounts for relatively little of Brazil‘s overall income inequality. We discuss implications for public policy debates in Brazil, and for the broader scientific and political challenges of ethnic and racial data collection and analysis. 2 Introduction The recent introduction of race-targeted affirmative action policies in Brazil unleashed a contentious national debate over whether, how, and toward what ends the government should engage in the racial classification of citizens. In its general contours, this national conversation in Brazil echoes analogous discussions in a growing number of countries around the globe. Voices of opposition to the Brazilian government‘s long-established practice of official racial classification raise principled arguments in defense of the liberal ideal of individual equality before the law.
    [Show full text]