Former President Zelaya's Report on the Situation of Honduras 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Former President Zelaya's Report on the Situation of Honduras 1 Appendix 3 – Former President Zelaya’s Report on the Situation of Honduras ORIGINAL TEXT IN SPANISH REPORT ON THE SITUATION IN HONDURAS Santo Domingo, July 9, 2010 Regarding the resolution adopted at the fortieth regular session of the General Assembly of the Organization of American States “[t]o form a High-Level Commission composed of persons appointed by the Secretary General to analyze the evolution of the situation referred to in Resolution AG/RES.1 (XXXVII-E/09).” FACTORS AND BACKGROUND WORTH NOTING The report of the OAS Secretary General on the status and situation of the resolution on the coup d’état in Honduras (AG/RES.1-XXXII-E/09), which he submitted to the OAS General Assembly at its fortieth regular session in Lima, Peru states and concludes that all the efforts and initiatives undertaken by the Organization to comply with the mandate assigned therein were in vain. Tegucigalpa/San José Agreement. The Agreements and suggestions promoted by diplomatic efforts and initiatives, backed by governments, were never implemented because of the de facto regime’s radical refusal to comply with them, which effectively doomed them to failure. That was what happened with the so-called Tegucigalpa/San José Agreement or “Guaymuras Dialogue,” the main purpose of which was to restore President Zelaya to office, along with other related obligations, such as the establishment of a Commission to verify compliance with the Agreements, the organization of a Government of Reconciliation and Unity, the holding of elections under the reconstituted rule of law, and the installation of a Truth Commission. Since the principal obligation related to the OAS mandate of restitution of the Constitutional President was not met, the legitimate Government denounced the Agreement to the OAS because of noncompliance with the Agreement on the part of those who had perpetrated the coup d’état. Consequently, all the obligations derived from the Agreement were then null and void. ASSESSMENT OF THE SITUATION REFERRED TO IN OAS RESOLUTION AG/RES.1 (XXXII-E/09), COUP D’ÉTAT IN HONDURAS 1. The restoration of democracy and the rule of law (AG/RES.1 / XXXII-E/09) According continuity to the coup d’état, and in violation of all the resolutions adopted and the mandates contained therein, the de facto regime of Roberto Micheletti Baín 1 Appendix 3 – Former President Zelaya’s Report on the Situation of Honduras managed to achieve its goal of holding elections under duress and handing over government to his successor, Porfirio Lobo Sosa. Having assumed office, and despite acknowledging that there had been a coup d’état in Honduras, Lobo Sosa has neither made an effort nor complied with even elementary requirements to restore democracy and the rule of law and thereby achieve international recognition. During Mr. Lobo Sosa’s government, the immunities, privileges, and impunity of the perpetrators and instigators of the violent disruption of the constitutional order have been systematically reinforced. The institutional integrity of the Honduran State is still being usurped by the perpetrators and accomplices of the coup d’état, who continue to hold public office and take steps impeding the restoration of democracy and the rule of law in Honduras. The most glaring evidence of that is the following: No punishment has yet been meted out to those who violated State institutions by forging, executing, legitimizing, and justifying the coup d’état of June 28, 2009 and all the offenses and breaches of the law that went with it. The National Congress appointed Roberto Micheletti Baín a Congressman for life, as a reward for having violated the constitutional order; suspended constitutional rights and guarantees; permitted and abetted falsification of the Constitutional President's signature in order to publish his fictitious resignation; allowed and attempted top legitimize the kidnapping, expulsion, and persecution of President Zelaya and senior officials in his government, and installed a regime for massive and selective repression of peacefully demonstrating citizens: a flagrant violation of human rights and crimes against humanity, in this case against the Honduran people, as well as other related crimes and offenses. The National Congress adopted an amnesty decree applicable only to the perpetrators of the coup d’état, granting impunity to the most abominable crimes and violations of human rights to the detriment of the defenseless population of Honduras. The Supreme Court dismissed all proceedings against the military command responsible for executing the coup d’état and for crimes against humanity. The Supreme Court dismissed judges opposed to the coup d’état. Perpetrators and accomplices of the coup d’état remain in office and unpunished, as do the Attorney General and the Magistrates of the Supreme Court of Justice, who are engaged in politically motivated judicial prosecution of President Zelaya and senior officials in his government. Proceedings fabricated after the coup d’état are 2 Appendix 3 – Former President Zelaya’s Report on the Situation of Honduras still running their course. The Government of Porfirio Lobo Sosa has incorporated into his government perpetrators and accomplices of the coup d’état, who are currently performing the most important functions directly for the Executive Branch. The wave of repression, persecution, and political crime which began on June 28, 2009 has systematically increased and become consolidated and institutionalized. No initiatives have been taken that suggest a political will to restore democracy and reconciliation by re-establishing the freedoms, rights, and civil and political guarantees of President Zelaya, senior officials in his Government and opponents of the coup d’état and current regime who are members of the National Popular Resistance Front and victims of repression and politically motivated judicial persecution, of defamation in the media, and of threats to their physical safety and honor, as a means of intimidating and sidelining them proper to the reign of terror created in Honduras. 2. Restitution to office of the Constitutional President, José Manuel Zelaya. AG/RES.1/XXXII-E/09): President Zelaya was not restored to the office to which he was elected, in free, transparent, and legitimate elections, by the Honduran people, in the presence of OAS, United Nations, and European Union observers. Valiant efforts by the international community and governments in the Americas, mediation initiatives, and agreements to that end were all totally in vain and were never implemented. Before and after his government was installed, Porfirio Lobo Sosa publicly acknowledged that a coup d’état had been carried out in his country and, in the Agreement signed with the President of the Dominican Republic, Leonel Fernández, on January 20, 2010, he recognized the ongoing validity of the investiture of José Manuel Zelaya Rosales as Constitutional President. Nevertheless, nothing has yet been done to restore the rights and guarantees that, in his own right and because of that investiture under the Constitution, pertain to former President Zelaya after the conclusion of the period for which he was elected legitimate representative of the sovereignty of the people. On the contrary, like other senior officials in his Government, President Zelaya remains in exile, still deprived of his constitutional rights and guarantees. He and his officials are being persecuted politically with judicial proceedings invented after his kidnapping and expulsion from his country, in an attempt to justify the coup d’état. Meanwhile the repressive regime remains implacable in its flagrant violation of the human rights of the population in general and of the regime’s opponents in particular. 3. Refusal to recognize the regime that arose from a rupture of the constitutional order (AG/RES.1 (XXXII-E/09) 3 Appendix 3 – Former President Zelaya’s Report on the Situation of Honduras Although the international community resolutely refused to recognize the de facto regime led by Roberto Micheletti Baín, the elections of November 30, 2009 created a transition to impunity and contempt of international opinion that is still in effect today. The elections were challenged as illegal and not recognized by the majority of Hondurans, and as having taken place without the participation of a considerable number of candidates for elected office, who decided not to run. The elections were held without the presence of international observers to validate the results and in violation of international treaties and conventions to which Honduras is party (Vienna Convention, human rights, and democratic rights). The elections of November 30 were held in the midst of a bloody repression, with civil rights suspended and harassment of the opposition media, in a militarized country subjected to systematic violation of human rights. The opposition in resistance had no part in the elections, after hundreds of candidates elected in primaries the year before resigned, and the Constitutional President was exposed, along with his family, fellow citizens, journalists and embassy officials, to constant harassment and torture in the Brazilian embassy in Tegucigalpa. IN CONCLUSION 1. The initial coup d’ état, assessed as such by the OAS and condemned by all, could not be reverted, due to the failure of all the diplomatic moves undertaken by the Organization of American States, despite all its efforts to “achieve the restoration of democracy and the rule of law in Honduras and the reinstatement
Recommended publications
  • Preliminary Report of the OAS Electoral Observation Mission in Honduras
    Preliminary Report of the OAS Electoral Observation Mission in Honduras The Electoral Observation Mission of the Organization of American States (EOM/OAS) in Honduras, headed by former President of Bolivia Jorge “Tuto” Quiroga, deployed a team of 82 experts and observers from 25 countries to cover the general elections held on November 26. The Mission began by dispatching an advance technical team to the country on October 30 to observe the preparation of the electoral cases (maletas electorales, containing election materials), the training being given to members of the polling stations, and the delivery of their credentials, along with other aspects relating to the transmission and dissemination of results, including demonstrations and the test run drill on November 12. On November 6 that team was joined by the mobile group observers, who traveled to the different departments in the country to observe in situ the progress being made with preparations for the elections and to meet the actors involved in the electoral process. The Mission completed its deployment with the arrival of the experts, regional coordinators, and international observers, together with the Head of Mission and the Special Advisor to the EOM, former President of Guatemala Álvaro Colom. During its stay in Honduras, the Mission met with government and electoral authorities, political parties and coalitions, the Supreme Court of Justice, representatives of civil society, the electricity company (Empresa de Energía de Honduras), and the diplomatic community, as well as other actors. The experts conducted a substantive analysis of the electoral process in terms of its organization, the technology used, campaign financing, gender perspective, electoral justice, and facilities for voting abroad.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter from the Government of Honduras on Actions Taken
    Appendix 13 – Letter from the Government of Honduras on actions taken OFFICIAL LETTER No.1077-DGPE/DSM-10 Tegucigalpa, June 4, 2010 Excellency, It is my honor to present my compliments and to say that the purpose of this letter in follow- up to the two notes sent to the international community in April 2010 is to express our desire for genuine understanding of the situation in our country and that the international community be suitably and correctly informed of the efforts of the Government of Honduras to implement a real process of national unity and reconciliation. I should begin by drawing attention to the fact that our president, Mr. Porfirio Lobo Sosa, has set about the task of leading the country with the strength afforded him by the legitimacy of a transparent election extensively observed by the international community, in which the majority of the people of Honduras clearly, lawfully, and unmistakably expressed their will in the search for peace, stability, and restored unity. This electoral process, called by the Supreme Electoral Tribunal under the administration of former President Zelaya Rosales, was preceded by the primary elections in which all legally registered political parties chose their candidates to the National Congress, Municipalities, and the Presidency of the Republic, a process monitored by international observers—including those from the Organization of American States (OAS)—who noted the transparency and success thereof. I am at pains to draw your attention to the fact that Article 51 of the Constitution of Honduras defines the Supreme Electoral Tribunal as an autonomous and independent entity responsible for the convocation, organization, direction, and supervision of electoral processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Term Development in Post-Disaster Intentional Communities in Honduras
    From Tragedy to Opportunity: Long-term Development in Post-Disaster Intentional Communities in Honduras A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Ryan Chelese Alaniz IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Ronald Aminzade June 2012 © Ryan Alaniz 2012 Acknowledgements Like all manuscripts of this length it took the patience, love, and encouragement of dozens of people and organizations. I would like to thank my parents for their support, numerous friends who provided feedback in informal conversations, my amazing editor and partner Jenny, my survey team, and the residents of Nueva Esperanza, La Joya, San Miguel Arcangel, Villa El Porvenir, La Roca, and especially Ciudad España and Divina for their openness in sharing their lives and experiences. Finally, I would like to thank Doug Hartmann, Pat McNamara, David Pellow, and Ross MacMillan for their generosity of time and wisdom. Most importantly I would like to express my gratitude to my advisor, Ron, who is an inspiration personally and professionally. I would also like to thank the following organizations and fellowship sponsors for their financial support: the University of Minnesota and the Department of Sociology, the Social Science Research Council, Fulbright, the Bilinski Foundation, the Public Entity Risk Institute, and the Diversity of Views and Experiences (DOVE) Fellowship. i Dedication This dissertation is dedicated to all those who have been displaced by a disaster and have struggled/continue to struggle to rebuild their lives. It is also dedicated to my son, Santiago. May you grow up with a desire to serve the most vulnerable.
    [Show full text]
  • Plh Partido Liberal De Honduras
    Partis Politiques PLH PARTIDO LIBERAL DE HONDURAS Données clés Date de création : 5 février 1891. Positionnement idéologique actuel : Libéral, de centre-droit à centre-gauche. Le manque de cohésion idéologique et la forte fragmentation interne rendent le positionnement flou. Affiliations internationales : Membre de l’Internationale libérale et de la COPPPAL (Conférence Permanente des Partis Politiques d’Amérique Latine et des Caraïbes). Implantations territoriales : Mobilisation des zones urbaines principalement. Le parti compte 31 bastions, situés dans l’ouest du pays et a l’avantage dans environ 61 autres municipalités plus au centre, à tendance abstentionniste. Principaux dirigeants : Roberto Michelleti Bain (Président du parti), Ernesto Elvin Santos Lozano (Vice- président), Bill O’Neill Santos Brito (Secrétaire Général), Eduardo Antonio Bueso (Secrétaire des Finances). Mode de désignation des dirigeants : Le Président du Conseil National Exécutif, son Vice-président et les secrétaires sont choisis lors des élections primaires par un vote direct, secret et selon le principe de proportionnalité. Mode de désignation des candidats : Les candidats à la Présidence et la Vice-présidence sont choisis lors d’élections internes ouvertes. Périodes au gouvernement : 1957-1963, 1982-1986, 1986-1990, 1994-1998, 1998-2002, 2006-2010. ________________________________________________________ Résultats électoraux (29 novembre 2009) Elections présidentielles Elections législatives Candidats Nombre de Parti politique Votes % Parti politique présidentiels
    [Show full text]
  • The Case Against Roberto Micheletti Baín
    Parents of Assassinated Activist sue Honduran Coup Leader: The Case against Roberto Micheletti Baín HONDURAS AND THE COUP aftermath have not been called to account for their actions. On June 28, 2009, the Honduran military kidnapped and forcibly exiled President Zelaya in a coup d’etat. The MURILLO V. MICHELETTI BAÍN coup against President Zelaya was universally condemned by the United Nations, the European On June 23, 2011, Union, the Organization of American States, the Inter- the Center for American Commission on Human Rights, and Constitutional numerous governments around the world, including Rights (CCR) filed that of the United States. a complaint in the Houston Division COUP OPPOSITION & THE KILLING OF ISIS of the Southern MURILLO District of Texas, on behalf of On July 5, 2009, President Zelaya attempted to return David Murillo and to Honduras and restore the democratically-elected Silvia Mencías, the government. Zelaya intended to return by airplane and parents of Isis land at Toncontin International Airport in the capital Obed Murillo. Silvia Mencías, the mother of Isis Obed of Tegucigalpa, although the self-declared interim Murillo, holds a photograph of her son. The defendant is government under de facto President Roberto Roberto Micheletti Baín, former president of the Micheletti Bain said it would not allow him to return. Honduran National Congress who assumed the role of Nineteen-year-old Isis Obed Murillo and his family head of the de facto government immediately joined thousands of other coup opponents at the following the coup d’etat ousting President Zelaya, and airport for a non-violent, peaceful gathering to acted as such until January 27, 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • EU EOM Honduras Final Report General Elections 2017
    HONDURAS FINAL REPORT General Elections 2017 EUROPEAN UNION ELECTION OBSERVATION MISSION www.moeue-honduras.eu This report has been produced by the European Union Election Observation Mission (EU EOM) to Honduras 2017 and contains the conclusions of its observation of the general elections. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official position of the European Union. European Union Election Observation Mission, Honduras 2017 Final Report on the General Elections TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................................3 II. THE EU EOM AND THE 2017 GENERAL ELECTIONS ..........................................................................................................8 III. POLITICAL CONTEXT........................................................................................................................................................9 IV. ELECTION SYSTEM ..........................................................................................................................................................9 V. ELECTION CAMPAIGN ...................................................................................................................................................10 VI. LEGAL FRAMEWORK .....................................................................................................................................................13 VII. CIVIL REGISTRY AND VOTER REGISTER
    [Show full text]
  • Honduras SIGI 2019 Category Low SIGI Value 2019 22%
    Country Honduras SIGI 2019 Category Low SIGI Value 2019 22% Discrimination in the family 25% Legal framework on child marriage 50% Percentage of girls under 18 married 27% Legal framework on household responsibilities 50% Proportion of the population declaring that children will suffer if mothers are working outside home for a pay - Female to male ratio of time spent on unpaid care work 3.1 Legal framework on inheritance 0% Legal framework on divorce 0% Restricted physical integrity 25% Legal framework on violence against women 25% Proportion of the female population justifying domestic violence 12% Prevalence of domestic violence against women (lifetime) 22% Sex ratio at birth (natural =105) 105 Legal framework on reproductive rights 100% Female population with unmet needs for family planning 11% Restricted access to productive and financial resources 24% Legal framework on working rights 100% Proportion of the population declaring this is not acceptable for a woman in their family to work outside home for a pay 7% Share of managers (male) 53% Legal framework on access to non-land assets 0% Share of house owners (male) 69% Legal framework on access to land assets 25% Share of agricultural land holders (male) - Legal framework on access to financial services 25% Share of account holders (male) 54% Restricted civil liberties 15% Legal framework on civil rights 0% Legal framework on freedom of movement 0% Percentage of women in the total number of persons not feeling safe walking alone at night 66% Legal framework on political participation 0% Share of the population that believes men are better political leaders than women - Percentage of male MP’s 79% Legal framework on access to justice 0% Share of women declaring lack of confidence in the justice system 58% Note: Higher values indicate higher inequality.
    [Show full text]
  • Vivajoh O #Fuerajoh an Analysis of Twitter's Takedown of Honduran
    #VivaJOH o #FueraJOH An analysis of Twitter’s takedown of Honduran accounts Elena Cryst and Isabella García-Camargo Stanford Internet Observatory April 2, 2020 io.stanford.edu Contents 1 Summary 3 1.1 Summary Statistics . 3 2 Key Takeaways 4 3 Background 5 3.1 President Juan Orlando Hernández . 5 3.2 Social Media Usage and Past Takedowns in Honduras . 6 4 April 2020 Twitter Takedown 7 4.1 Network Graph Analysis . 7 4.2 TNH and the Government Accounts . 9 4.3 The Content Creators . 12 4.4 Las Sexi . 13 4.5 The Activistas . 16 5 Conclusion 19 2 1 Summary On April 2, 2020, Twitter announced a takedown of datasets attributed to the social media manager of Honduran president Juan Orlando Hernández Alvarado (commonly referred to by his initials “JOH”). Among the over 3,000 accounts pulled down were the accounts of the Honduran government-owned television station Televisión Nacional de Honduras, several content creator accounts, accounts linked to several presidential initiatives, and some “like-for- likes” accounts likely in the follower-building stage. Interestingly, a subset of accounts in the dataset are related to self-identified artists, writers, feminists and intellectuals who largely posted tweets critical of the Honduran president. 1.1 Summary Statistics The Honduras takedown consists of 3,104 accounts and 1,165,019 tweets. 553,211 tweets were original and 611,808 were retweets. Accounts dated as far back as 2008, but roughly two thirds were created in the last year. Figure 1: Accounts created per day, 11/21/2008 – 1/3/2020 The rate of tweets swelled as the number of accounts grew, but with distinct peaks that coincided with several events in Honduras, including the start of the president’s re-election bid in 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Transformaciones En La Política Exterior De Honduras Y Su Expresión En Las Relaciones Con El Salvador Y Nicaragua (2009-2017)
    Esta tesis está dedicada: Principalmente a Dios, por darme la vida y la oportunidad de llegar hasta este momento tan importante de mi formación profesional. Por brindarme la salud y la fuerza suficiente para lograr mis objetivos y, por nunca dejarme caer en los peores momentos de mi vida. A mis padres, Vicente Paul Kauil Nahuat y María Oliveria Poot Uc, quienes con su inmenso amor y sacrificio me han brindado todo lo que han podido, por hacer de mí una persona con buenos valores. Gracias por apoyarme en este proceso, por creer en mí y por enseñarme a no rendirme. Gracias por darme la dicha de ser su Hijo, ustedes son mi motor más grande en la vida. A mis hermanos: Josué, Osvaldo, Cristóbal, por soportar mis cambios de humor, quizá no he sido el mejor hermano, pero a ustedes les debo más de lo que se pueden imaginar, Gracias por no dejarme solo en este camino que no ha sido nada fácil. A mi hermana y cuñado: Elmi Roceli y Ever, por darme el tesoro más grande, mis dos sobrinos -Johan y Gina-, Gracias por escucharme y no juzgar mi vida. A mi directora de tesis, la Dra. Jazmín Benítez López, por creer en mí, por brindarme su experiencia y confianza en la elaboración de este proyecto. Gracias por el tiempo, por compartir el conocimiento, motivarme y aconsejarme. Mi más grande admiración, por su paciencia, esfuerzo y dedicación en el campo de la investigación. Estaré eternamente agradecido por brindarme su amistad. Asimismo, agradezco al comité lector de la tesis, al Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • As Honduran President Prepares for New Term, Doubts Persist Regarding Vote Count George Rodrãguez
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository NotiCen Latin America Digital Beat (LADB) 1-11-2018 As Honduran President Prepares for New Term, Doubts Persist Regarding Vote Count George RodrÃguez Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/noticen Recommended Citation RodrÃguez, George. "As Honduran President Prepares for New Term, Doubts Persist Regarding Vote Count." (2018). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/noticen/10486 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Latin America Digital Beat (LADB) at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in NotiCen by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LADB Article Id: 80492 ISSN: 1089-1560 As Honduran President Prepares for New Term, Doubts Persist Regarding Vote Count by George Rodríguez Category/Department: Honduras Published: 2018-01-11 The messy outcome of the recent presidential election in Honduras was nothing close to a surprise, considering the fact that, by nature, politics in this Central American nation are, at best, complicated. Promoted by the rightist and ruling Partido Nacional (National Party, PN), incumbent President Juan Orlando Hernández rode on his administration’s slogan, Honduras está cambiando (Honduras is changing), stressing that his social and security achievements needed four more years to be further strengthened (NotiCen, Jan. 5, 2017, April 20, 2017, Sept. 14, 2017). The center-left Alianza de Oposición Contra la Dictadura (Opposition Alliance Against the Dictatorship), with Salvador Nasralla, a sports journalist and television host as its presidential choice, came out with a powerful message accusing Hernández of leading a corrupt and repressive regime, arguing that he would surely rig the vote to ensure his re-election.
    [Show full text]
  • Honduras Political Crisis
    Honduras political crisis The situation 2. Crisis management planning After more than 27 years of democratic rule, Honduras was Once it was clear to our crisis management team that the thrown into political turmoil following the removal of President security situation was deteriorating, a meeting was convened Manuel Zelaya by the military in the early hours of 28 June to determine a strategy to support clients in Honduras and 2009. Zelaya’s ousting and subsequent exile were sparked by those who planned to travel there. his attempt to push forward with a controversial referendum which would have allowed him to change the constitution red24 assistance in the Honduras crisis: red24’s Crisis and extend his term in office. A few hours after the apparent Response Management Centre is actively monitoring coup, the Honduran congress speaker, Roberto Micheletti, developments in Honduras. We currently have security was sworn in as interim president with the support of the consultants on the ground who are aiding clients in the country. legislature, the courts and the military. Should you require assistance, please do not hesitate to contact red24. These political changes led to substantial tension; pro- and anti-Zelaya protests were held in a number of towns and cities 3. Travel and security alerts – Email and SMS (text) and some turned violent. The situation was particularly acute in notification the capital, Tegucigalpa. Violent confrontations were focused Email and SMS alerts were sent to subscribers whenever there on the presidential palace and later the international airport, was a significant security development in Honduras. Using this and riot police used teargas and water cannon to disperse information, clients could avoid potentially dangerous areas hundreds of angry demonstrators.
    [Show full text]
  • Amicus Curiae in the Case of Vicky Hernández
    350 Fifth Avenue, 34th Floor New York, NY 10118-3299 Tel: +1-212-290-4700 Fax: +1-212-736-1300; 917-591-3452 Kenneth Roth, Executive Director New York, November 11, 2020 Deputy Executive Directors Michele Alexander, Development and Global Initiatives Judge Elizabeth Odio Benito Emma Daly, Media (Acting) Barbara Pirto, Operations (Acting) President Joseph Saunders, Program (Acting) Bruno Stagno Ugarte, Advocacy Inter-American Court of Human Rights San José, Costa Rica Colin Mincy, Chief People Officer Dinah PoKempner, General Counsel James Ross, Legal and Policy Director Subject: Human Rights Watch Amicus Curiae in Division and Program Directors the Case of Vicky Hernández and Family v. Brad Adams, Asia Nicole Austin-Hillery, United States Honduras Eric Goldstein, Middle East & North Africa (Acting) Mausi Segun, Africa José Miguel Vivanco, Americas Hugh Williamson, Europe and Central Asia I. INTRODUCTION Heather Barr, Women’s Rights (Acting) Shantha Rau Barriga, Disability Rights Richard Dicker, International Justice Lama Fakih, Crisis and Conflict Human Rights Watch (“HRW”) respectfully submits this brief to the Inter- Bill Frelick, Refugees’ Rights Arvind Ganesan, Business and Human Rights Steve Goose, Arms American Court of Human Rights (“Inter-American Court” or “this Court”) as Amanda Klasing, Women’s Rights (Acting) Zama Neff, Children’s Rights amicus curiae in the case Vicky Hernández and Family v. Honduras, filed by La Graeme Reid, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Rights Daniel Wilkinson, Environment and Human Rights (Acting) Red Lésbica Cattrachas and Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights on behalf of three Advocacy Directors Maria Laura Canineu, Brazil family members of the decedent in the case.
    [Show full text]