The Mabo Lecture. Larissa Behrendt

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Mabo Lecture. Larissa Behrendt The Joumal o.fIndigenous Policv - Issue 8 THE MABO LECTURE. LARISSABEHRENDT- The Long Path to Land Justice In the yearssince the Mabo casedelivered the promiseof land justice, many factors have worked to prevent the expectationsit gave to Indigenous peopleacross Australia from being delivered. This lecture will explore the barriers to achieving the vision of Aboriginal rights to land that were articulatedin theMabo case.These include the re-conceptualisingof native title as a regime to give certainty to non- Aboriginal interests,the romanticismof Aboriginal culturethat permeatedthe judgement and the fact that, under the judicial system. it is judges who determinewhat 'Aboriginal culfure' is. Intricately related to this issue is the way that native title, like other Aboriginal rights and interests,tends to polariseAustralians. This lecturewill posethe questionof why this is so and what this meansif real socialjustice is to be achievedfor Aboriginal people. So fundamentalwas the result in the Mabo case,many of us still remember where we were when we first heard that the High Court had overturnedthe doctrineof terra nullius and had found that Aboriginal rights existedin land. I was in the corridor of the law schoolthat I was studyingat, the samelaw schoolwhere my property classand briefly looked at the Gove Land Rightscase and was told that it had affirmedthe fact that Australianlaw did not recogniserights to land of Aboriginal people.We thenmoved on for the rest of the term to study the heavily protectedrights to land of non-Aboriginal people. Therewere threethings that made the Mabo casean importantmoment: It overtumed the notion that we as Aboriginal people did not exist; It recognisedIndigenous rights to land; and it providedan exampleof how laws that for so long had beenused as a tool of colonisationcould actuallybe a tool ofjustice. I want to exploreeach of thesethree themes in my lecturetonight and I am particularlygoing to focus on why it is that the first two propositions the 'I This paperwas presentedon 7'r'June.2006 at JamesCook University LarissaBehrendt is Professorof Law and Director of Researchat the Jumbunnalndigenous House of Leaming, University of Technology, Sydney. She has a law degree from the University of New South Wales and a Mastersof Laws and SeniorDoctorate of Jurisprudence from the Harvard Law School. Her current rcscarchis focusedon Indigenousgovernance and Indigenouspolicy issues.She is the author of Achie'"ing SocialJusticc and the award-winning novel. Home. She is a Director of thc Bangarra Dance Thcatre and the Sydney Writers Festival.Larissa also sits on the Board of the Muscum of ContemporaryArt. She is a Judicial Member of the Administrative DccisionsTribunal and tl.reSerious Off'cndcrs Review Council. Sheis alsoa columnisttbr the NationalIndiscnous Times. lu-l Tne .llaho Lecture overturning of the doctrine of terrq nullius and the recognition of a native title - remain so contentioussince the decision and I also want to look at the extent to which the law has been usedto limit the potential of the Mabo decision and look at what possiblerole it canplay in achievingland justice and socialjustice for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanderpeople today. I. The War on Terru Nullius The reason why many of us remember where we were when we first heard about the Mabo case was becauseof the importance of the symbolic overturning of the doctrine of terrq nullius.I grew up in a country where the legal system did not recognisethe rights of my people to our land and was silent about our sovereignty. It was still the law of the land when I studied at universify and to those laws we remainedinvisible. In the decisionin Mabo, Australian law finally recognisedthat Indigenouspeople were actually here and that we had a system of laws and governance.It was also an important legal victory because the recognition of Indigenous presence and Indigenous governancesystems meant that the court had to find that Aboriginal people held certainrights, including rights to land and that in certaincircumstances, thoserights survivetoday. In the yearssince the Mabo case,many of our communityhave become disillusionedwith the way in which subsequentcourts have wound back the promiseof the Mabo decision.But the symbolicimportance remains. And it is true that the law no longertreats us as thoughwe are invisible. So why has the notion of terra nullius become the centre of heated debate?The basic argumentput forward in a new book is that terra rullius is a new conceptand so, when CaptainCook claimedAustralia, he did not do so as a resultof the doctrine.Instead, the doctrinecame to prominencein the work of historian Henry Reynolds- whose work has been the most attackedby the white-blindfoldview of Australianhistory - and it was this flawed work (so the argumentgoes) that misled the court. As such, the argumentgoes, the High Court must have been wrong when it overturned the doctrine and, by implication,the Mabo casewas wrongly decided.And much like the decision itself which led to a barrageof idiotic and unsubstantiatedfear-mongering claiming that people's homeswere in dangerfrom nativetitle claims,this tale of terrq nullius has also sparkedexcitement from the anti-Aboriginaland anti- rights brigade. Even legal commentatorshave joined the chorus. Professor David Flint was quoted in TheAustralian as saying that the farmersand miners 'who havepaid for Mabo, and are still paying', may havegrounds to sue.It has all the hallmarksof the hysteriawhipped up by white supremaciststhat Mabo would takeeveryone's back yard. However,as with the original decision,the hyped-uphysteria over lerra ntrlliuscan be dismissedwith a simplereading of the Mabo case.Terra nullius describesa legal fiction that treats Aboriginal people as though they were invisible and had no sovereignand, as a result, no recognisedrights to land, wateror otherresources or to self-governanceor sovereignty. t04 Larissa Behrendt And while the court may have said that the doctrine was overturned, what they really did in the judgement was overturn a case called Cooper v Stuart. It was this 1889 case that held that in coloniesthat were practically unoccupied,without inhabitantsand without settledlaw, Indigenouspeople's rights were not recognised.(It basically reinforced the terra nullius doctrine but didn't call it that).In usingthe term terra nullius in 1992,the court was usinga new term to describea long establishedattitude in dealing with Indigenous people.It is like sayingthat any slaughterof peoplebefore the 1930scould not be called 'genocide'because the word did not come into the languagein its currentuse before that time. Like 'genocide',terra nttlliusis a new term for an old concept. The real beef in this debate about terra nullius seemsto be with Henry Reynolds,but - and no offence to Henry - while the court did referencehis work in two places,this can hardly be characterisedas reliance.Sir Anthony Mason,who was the headof the High Court at the time of the Mabo decision, evenconfessed to not havingread any ofHenry Reynolds'books. To assert Reynolds' influenced on the court also fundamentally misunderstandsthe legal process,namely, that judges look to what the law is and refy on casesand precedents,like Cooper v Stuart.They are not deciding who was right or wrong in history. They are balancinglegal rights basedon what othercases tell them they canand cannotdo. Sir Anthony Mason also denouncedthose commentators who speculate abolt terra nullius and has assertedthat the key issue in the Mabo case was whether,when the British claimedAustralia, they did so absolutelyor whether they had to recognisecertain other rights that might exist.The court found that the British did have to take the land with the rights of Aboriginal people attachedto it. In the sameinterview, Sir Anthony Mason also noted that the contentionthat the doctrineof terrq nullius damagedthe nationwas 'absolutely absurd'.He said: We were brought up on the footing that the Aborigines were people roaming the continentwho never remainedin one particulararea without any relationshipwith thc land. Well. of course.we now know that's all wrong. When askedwhy the High Court seemsto get so much criticism for the Mabo and Zifr decision,the former Chief Justicenoted that the antagonism seemsto come from people 'who are against a just society, who want to repudiate that the state has a responsibility to assist' those who are disadvantaged. If sucha grossmisreadin-e of the importanceof terra nullius inthe Mabo casecan causesuch hysteria. it really doesraise the questionas to why this is so?The answer,I can guarantee.rvill say more aboutthe way non-Aboriginals see their history than it will say about Aboriginal people.At its heart, this quibbling overteva nullius is anotherattempt to Llsea semanticdebate to hide an historicaltravesty. We havewitnessed the denialsof frontierviolence against Aboriginal people.with historiansdebating * hetherthe accountsin police reportswere 1rt: The Mabo Lecture more valid than the accounts in squatter's diaries and the oral histories of Aboriginal people. We had to listen to the semanticdebates about whether the children taken from their families - and living with the legacy of the removal 'removed' policy - were 'stolen' or for their own good. And while Aboriginal peoplehad to come to terms with the psychological,emotional and sometimes physical trauma of those experiencesof being taken from their families or having children taken from them, they had to endure a public debate about 'cultural
Recommended publications
  • HOME Larissa Behrendt
    1 UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND PRESS HOME Larissa Behrendt Teachers’ Notes Written by a practising high school teacher and head of department – middle school curriculum ISBN: 978 0 7022 3407 1 AU$24.95 Synopsis 2 Themes 2 Belonging 2 Marginalisation 3 Cultural Identity and 3 Aboriginality Aboriginal History and Law 3 Study Notes 4 About the Author 6 These notes may be reproduced free of charge for use and study within schools but they may not be reproduced (either in whole or in part) and offered for commercial sale. Staff House Road PO Box 6042 St Lucia QLD 4067 St Lucia QLD 4067 Ph: (+61 7) 3365 2606 [email protected] University of Queensland Press Australia Australia Fax: (+61 7) 3365 7579 www.uqp.com.au ABN 63 942 912 684 2 UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND PRESS SYNOPSIS Larissa Behrendt’s award-winning novel, Home, is a poignant look into the direct and indirect consequences of the Aboriginal stolen generation. The chain of events begins when Garibooli, a young Aboriginal girl, is removed by authorities in 1918, never to be reunited with her family. The subsequent search for identity by the generations of children stemming from Garibooli reveals scars within the Aboriginal community that can never be healed completely. Behrendt cleverly shows this search for identity and belonging in a colonial world by following the children and grandchildren of Garibooli, as Garibooli was made to feel too ashamed to pass on her heritage to her progeny. The numerous characters give human faces and experiences to a highly politicised issue in contemporary Australian society, making Home a solid text in which to explore these issues in the classroom.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aboriginal Gender Study | FINAL REPORT
    The Aboriginal Gender Study A research report prepared by the Aboriginal Health Council of South Australia Ltd. © The Aboriginal Health Council of South Australia Ltd. Contacts and the Lowitja Institute. 2019 The Aboriginal Health Council ISBN: 978-0-9943253-1-0 of South Australia Ltd. 220 Franklin Street, Adelaide First published: June 2019 South Australia, 5000 AUSTRALIA This work is published by the Aboriginal Health T +61 8 8273 7200 Council of South Australia Ltd. The project was E [email protected] funded by the Lowitja Institute, Australia’s national www.ahcsa.org.au institute for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health research, incorporating the Lowitja Institute The Lowitja Institute Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health CRC (the PO Box 650, Carlton South Lowitja Institute CRC), a collaborative partnership Victoria, 3053 AUSTRALIA funded by the Cooperative Research Centre Program T +61 3 8341 5555 of the Australian Government Department of Industry, E [email protected] Innovation and Science. www.lowitja.org.au This work is copyright. It may be reproduced in For Citation Aboriginal Health Council of whole or in part for study or training purposes, or South Australia Ltd. (2019). The Aboriginal Gender by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community Study: Final Report. AHCSA, Adelaide. organisations subject to an acknowledgment of the source and no commercial use or sale. Reproduction Project Investigator Group Amanda Mitchell, for other purposes or by other organisations requires Alice Rumbold, Gabriella Zizzo, Dominic Guerrera, the written permission of the copyright holder. Courtney Hammond, Odette Pearson, Karen Glover, Gokhan Ayturk and Vivienne Moore.
    [Show full text]
  • A Sociology of the Chick Lit of Anita Heiss
    A Sociology of the Chick Lit of Anita Heiss By Fiannuala Morgan Submitted in total fulfillment of the requirements of Master of Arts (Thesis only) School of Culture and Communication, University of Melbourne 1 Abstract Wiradjuri woman, Anita Heiss, is arguably one of the first Australian authors of popular fiction. Since 2007, she has published across a diversity of genres including chick lit, contemporary women’s fiction, romance, memoir and children’s literature. A focus on the political characterises her work; and her identity as an author is both supplemented and complemented by her roles as an academic, activist and public intellectual. Heiss has discussed genre as a means of targeting specific audiences that may be less engaged with Indigenous affairs, and positions her novels as educative but not didactic. There remains, however, some ambivalence about the significance of the role that genre plays in her literature as well as for the diverse and differentiated audience that she attracts. The aims of this thesis then are two-fold: firstly, to present a complication of academic conceptions of genre, then to use this discussion to explore the social significance of Heiss’ literature. My focus is Heiss’ first four chick lit novels: Not Meeting Mr Right (2007), Avoiding Mr Right (2008), Manhattan Dreaming (2010) and Paris Dreaming (2011). Scholarship in the field leans toward an understanding that the racial politics of non-white articulations of the chick lit genre are invariably incompatible with the basic formula of chick lit texts. My thesis proposes a methodological shift from the dominant mode of ideological analysis to one that is largely focused on reader response.
    [Show full text]
  • Income Management and Indigenous Women: a New Chapter of Patriarchal Colonial Governance?
    2016 Thematic: Income Management and Indigenous Women 843 16 INCOME MANAGEMENT AND INDIGENOUS WOMEN: A NEW CHAPTER OF PATRIARCHAL COLONIAL GOVERNANCE? SHELLEY BIELEFELD* I INTRODUCTION Like other colonial countries, Australia has long governed its First Peoples with intrusive paternalism. Paternalistic governance has created ongoing problems for Australia’s First Peoples, also referred to in national discourse as Indigenous peoples and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. 1 Such paternalism has created specific difficulties for Indigenous women who have been subject to surveillance and controlled by colonialism in every sphere of their lives. This article will explore some of these forms of surveillance and argue that new forms of paternalism ushered in by ‘the global ascendance of neo- liberal policies and discourses’2 have reproduced similar racialised and gendered impacts for Indigenous women as were apparent in previous policies. Situating income management in a global context, welfare reform has been and continues to be underway in many Western nations as policies are fitted to the framework * Dr Shelley Bielefeld is the Inaugural Braithwaite Research Fellow at the RegNet School of Regulation and Global Governance at the Australian National University. The author wishes to thank Professor Jon Altman, Professor Larissa Behrendt, Associate Professor Thalia Anthony, Dr Marina Nehme, Dr Elise Klein and the anonymous reviewers for their most helpful comments on an earlier draft. This article was written whilst a visiting scholar at the Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research at the Australian National University and Jumbunna Indigenous House of Learning at the University of Technology Sydney. The author thanks both institutions for their gracious hospitality and their staff for such stimulating dialogue.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Thesisadobe
    Difficult Knowledge and Uncomfortable Pedagogies: student perceptions and experiences of teaching and learning in Critical Indigenous Australian Studies Marcelle Townsend-Cross (BA, SCU; MEd, UTS) A thesis submitted in fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences University of Technology Sydney 2018 ii Certificate of Original Authorship I, Marcelle Townsend-Cross declare that this thesis is submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at the University of Technology Sydney. This thesis is wholly my own work unless otherwise referenced or acknowledged. In addition, I certify that all information sources and literature used are indicated in the thesis. This document has not been submitted for qualifications at any other academic institution. Signature: Production Note: Signature removed prior to publication. Date: 26th February 2018 iii Acknowledgements I owe my gratitude to the teachers and students who generously agreed to participate in my research. Their courageous and candid contributions provided rich and compelling insights that positively shaped my research in immeasurable ways. I am very grateful to Dr. Rick Flowers who expertly guided me through the research process with enthusiasm, mindfulness and patience. I am so very grateful and privileged to have been a recipient of the Jumbunna Postgraduate Research Scholarship. Many people have inspired and encouraged me throughout my candidature – family, friends and colleagues - and I am humbled by your consistent and persistent belief in me, especially during the times when I didn’t particularly believe in myself, thank you.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Eliza: Power and Colonial Storytelling by Larissa Behrendt 211 Pp., Illus, University of Queensland Press, St Lucia, 2016, ISBN 9780702253904 (Pbk), $24.95
    finding Eliza: power and Colonial storytelling by Larissa Behrendt 211 pp., illus, University of Queensland Press, St Lucia, 2016, ISBN 9780702253904 (pbk), $24.95. Review by Peter Read National Centre for Indigenous History The Australian National University Larissa Behrendt, distinguished Professor of Law in the Jumbunna Indigenous House of Learning at the University of Technology Sydney, has extended her redoubtable talents into film-production, fiction and history. This short but punchy book begins with the variety of ways in which the story of Eliza Fraser, shipwrecked off Fraser Island near Hervey Bay in 1836, has been interpreted by many writers of many generations. Fraser’s story has been conflated with popular tales of Native American and Man Friday–style savages, which served to exaggerate the supposed barbarism of her hosts and enabled subsequent writers to place her story firmly into the sensational category of female captivity narratives. In this she traverses the same ground as other writers, especially Kay Shaeffer and Veronica Brady. A short chapter addresses the Butchulla people, amongst whom Fraser lived. The Elder Olga Miller, following an oral tradition, believes that a Clever Woman, on Fraser’s unexpected arrival, marked her with white ochre which continued to protect her until her rescue. Fraser was indignant at being asked to carry out camp chores which Olga Miller interpreted as her necessary contribution to her being cared for. From this point the book widens into a broader discussion on literature, including an analysis of Pritchard’s Coonardoo. Many, including Manning Clark, welcomed the book demonstrating that love was possible between whites and Aborigines (as if such a proposition needed to be verified).
    [Show full text]
  • Telling Stories
    LeadingWriters-FinalText.x 5/2/07 9:45 AM Page 16 Telling Stories By Larissa Behrendt I was born into a culture that has a tradition of storytelling. Indigenous cultures across Australia have cultural on “Dreamtime” stories that explain our relationship to each other and to our land and also teach us about the standard of behav- iour that are expected of us. These stories are like “law stories” or morality tales. Perhaps because I came from this background, I always knew that telling a story is a powerful way to influence people. Even now, as a lawyer and advocate for Aboriginal issues, I find that being able to explain in human terms how an unfair law or policy will affect a person’s life will be much more influential in getting politicians, policy makers, law makers or the general public to understand why we need law reform than sticking to simple, legalistic arguments. I always loved writing. I enjoy writing stories and I find writing about the issues I believe in — social justice, reconcilia- tion, government policy and Indigenous matters — to be an important and empowering thing. And I enjoyed writing when I was younger and my interest in politics was beginning. I used writing as a way of finding my voice. Even today I write both fiction and non-fiction to talk about the issues that are of continuing importance to Aboriginal people — the debilitating experiences of racism, the impact of poverty on families, the redeeming and healing power of love, identity and community — as a way of giving voice to these experiences.
    [Show full text]
  • No Place for a White Woman?
    Edith Cowan University Research Online Theses: Doctorates and Masters Theses 2012 No place for a white woman? An exploration of the interplay of gender, race and class on power relations experienced by white western women in cross-cultural settings Suzanne Jane Rumney Edith Cowan University Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses Part of the Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons Recommended Citation Rumney, S. J. (2012). No place for a white woman? An exploration of the interplay of gender, race and class on power relations experienced by white western women in cross-cultural settings. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/482 This Thesis is posted at Research Online. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/482 Edith Cowan University Copyright Warning You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorize you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person any copyright material contained on this site. You are reminded of the following: Copyright owners are entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright infringement. A court may impose penalties and award damages in relation to offences and infringements relating to copyright material. Higher penalties may apply, and higher damages may be awarded, for offences and infringements involving the conversion of material into digital or electronic form. No place for a white woman? An exploration of the interplay of gender, race and class on power relations experienced by white western women in cross-cultural settings.
    [Show full text]
  • Mediating Across Difference: Oceanic and Asian Approaches To
    mediating across difference oceanic and asian approaches to conflict resolution Edited by Morgan Brigg and Roland Bleiker writing past colonialism mediating across difference Writing Past Colonialism is the signature book series of the Institute of Postcolonial Studies, based in Melbourne, Australia. By postcolonialism we understand modes of writing and artistic production that critically engage with and contest the legacy and continuing mindset and practices of colonialism, and inform debate about the processes of globalization. This manifests itself in a concern with difference from the Euro-American, the global, and the norm. The series is also committed to publishing works that seek “to make a difference,” both in the academy and outside it. our hope is that books in the series will • engage with contemporary issues and problems relating to colonialism and postcolonialism • attempt to reach a broad constituency of readers • address the relation between theory and practice • be interdisciplinary in approach as well as subject matter • experiment with new modes of writing and methodology INSTITUTE OF POSTCOLONIAL STUDIES | WRITING PAST COLONIALISM Selves in Question: Interviews on Southern African Auto/biography Edited by Judith Lütge Coullie, Stephan Meyer, Thengani Ngwenya, and Thomas Olver Boundary Writing: An Exploration of Race, Culture, and Gender Binaries in Contemporary Australia Edited by Lynette Russell Postcolonizing the International: Working to Change the Way We Are Edited by Phillip Darby Dark Writing: geography, performance,
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Wollstonecraft Revisited 29 Ann Curthoys
    Contents Contributors iii Introduction: Key Thinkers and Their Contemporary Legacy 1 Ned Curthoys Volney and the science of morality in revolutionary France 7 Alexander Cook Mary Wollstonecraft revisited 29 Ann Curthoys Raphaël Lemkin, creator of the concept of genocide: a world history perspective 49 John Docker Thinking with Stanner in the present 75 Melinda Hinkson Judith Butler: disturbance, provocation and the ethics of non-violence 93 Fiona Jenkins Contributors Ned Curthoys is a research fellow in the School of Cultural Inquiry at the Australian National University. His areas of interest include comparative and post-colonial literature and German-Jewish intellectual history. He is the co- editor, along with Debjani Ganguly, of Edward Said: the Legacy of a Public Intellectual (2007) and is working on a book about the influence of Liberal Judaism on the thought of Ernst Cassirer and Hannah Arendt. Alexander Cook is based in the School of History, RSSS, at the Australian National University. His research focuses on the social history of ideas in Western Europe and its colonies during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Ann Curthoys is an Australian Research Council Professorial Fellow at the University of Sydney. She has written on many aspects of Australian history and on questions of historical theory and writing. Her publications include For and Against Feminism (1988); Freedom Ride: A Freedom Rider Remembers (2002), (with John Docker) Is History Fiction? (2005, 2nd ed. 2010); (with Ann Genovese and Alexander Reilly), Rights and Redemption: History, Law, and Indigenous People (2008); and (with Ann McGrath) How to Write History that People Want to Read (2009).
    [Show full text]
  • History, Power, Text: Cultural Studies and Indigenous
    History, Power, Text: Cultural Studies and Indigenous Studies is a History, Power, Text collection of essays on Indigenous themes published between 1996 and 2013 in the journal known first as UTS Review and now as Cultural Studies Review. This journal opened up a space for new kinds of politics, new styles of writing and new modes of interdisciplinary engagement. History, Power, Text highlights the significance of just one of the exciting interdisciplinary spaces, or meeting points, the journal enabled. ‘Indigenous cultural studies’ is our name for the intersection of cultural studies and Indigenous studies showcased here. Timothy Neale, Crystal McKinnon and Eve Vincent (eds) This volume republishes key works by academics and writers Katelyn Barney, Jennifer Biddle, Tony Birch, Wendy Brady, Gillian Cowlishaw, Robyn Ferrell, Bronwyn Fredericks, Heather Goodall, Tess Lea, Erin Manning, Richard Martin, Aileen Moreton-Robinson, Stephen Muecke, Alison Ravenscroft, Deborah Bird Rose, Lisa Slater, Sonia Smallacombe, Rebe Taylor, Penny van Toorn, Eve Vincent, Irene Watson and Virginia Watson—many of whom have taken this opportunity to write reflections on their work—as well as interviews between Christine Nicholls and painter Kathleen Petyarre, and Anne Brewster and author Kim Scott. The book also features new essays by Birch, Moreton-Robinson and Crystal McKinnon, and a roundtable discussion with former and current journal editors Chris Healy, Stephen Muecke and Katrina Schlunke. Cover illustration: History, Power, Text: Cultural Studies Michael Cook, Majority Rule (Bus), 2014, ink-jet print on paper, 98 × 140 cm Courtesy the artist and Andrew Baker Art Dealer and Indigenous Studies Timothy Neale, Crystal McKinnon and Eve Vincent (eds) CSR Books CSR Books History, Power, Text CSR Books CSR Books is a book series initiated by the journal Cultural Studies Review, and published as an e-book by UTS e-Press with print-on-demand paperbacks also available.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminist Periodicals
    The Un vers ty of W scons n System Feminist Periodicals A current listing of contents WOMEN'S STUDIES Volume 25, Number 2 Summer 2005 Published by Phyllis Holman Weisbard LIBRARIAN Women's Studies Librarian Feminist Periodicals A current listing of contents Volume 25, Number 2 (Summer 2005) Periodical literature is the cutting edge ofwomen's scholarship, feminist theory, and much ofwomen's culture. Feminist Periodicals: A Current Listing of Contents is published by the Office of the University of Wisconsin System Women's Studies Librarian on a quarterly basis with the intent of increasing public awareness of feminist periodicals. It is our hope that Feminist Periodicals will serve several purposes: to keep the reader abreast of current topics in feminist literature; to increase readers' familiarity with a wide spectrum offeminist periodicals; and to provide the requisite bibliographic information should a reader wish to subscribe to a journal or to obtain a particular article at her library or through interlibrary loan. (Users will need to be aware of the limitations of the new copyright law with regard to photocopying of copyrighted materials.) Table ofcontents pages from currentissues ofmajor feministjournals are reproduced in each issue ofFeminist Periodicals, preceded by a comprehensive annotated listing of all journals we have selected. As publication schedules vary enormously, not every periodical will have table of contents pages reproduced in each issue of FP. The annotated listing provides the fOllowing information on each journal: 1. Year of first publication. 2. Frequency of publication. 3. U.S. sUbscription price(s). 4. Subscription address. 5. Current editor. 6.
    [Show full text]