Plecoptera: Perlodidae), Two New Stonefly Species from North Carolina, U.S.A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Plecoptera: Perlodidae), Two New Stonefly Species from North Carolina, U.S.A Beaty, S.R., V.B. Holland, & D.R. Lenat. 2017. Isoperla arcana and Isoperla borisi (Plecoptera: Perlodidae), two new stonefly species from North Carolina, U.S.A. with notes on the distribution of Isoperla powhatan. Illiesia, 13(14):140-166. https://doi.org/10.25031/2017/13.14 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8EFAB403-E49D-489A-A9BA-F237880142C6 ISOPERLA ARCANA AND ISOPERLA BORISI (PLECOPTERA: PERLODIDAE), TWO NEW STONEFLY SPECIES FROM NORTH CAROLINA, U.S.A. WITH NOTES ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF ISOPERLA POWHATAN Steven R. Beaty1*, Victor B. Holland1, & David R. Lenat2 1 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Resources, Water Sciences Section, 4401 Reedy Creek Road, Raleigh, NC, 27607, U.S.A. Email: [email protected], [email protected] 2 deceased, 28 April 2016 *Corresponding author ABSTRACT Two new perlodid stonefly species, Isoperla arcana Beaty, Holland, & Lenat, 2017 and I. borisi Beaty, Holland, & Lenat, 2017, are described from North Carolina, U.S.A. Associated images, scanning electron micrographs, and illustrations of reared adult males, females, larvae, and eggs are presented for each species. In addition, a map is included depicting the North Carolina distributions of each species. Adult males of the recently described I. powhatan Szczytko and Kondratieff, 2015 were also reared from larvae collected from a North Carolina stream. This represents a range extension for I. powhatan, previously known only from Pennsylvania and Virginia. Including Isoperla borisi sp. nov., I. arcana sp. nov. and the range extension of I. powhatan, thirty Isoperla species are now known from North Carolina. Keywords: Isoperla arcana Beaty, Holland, & Lenat, 2017; Isoperla borisi Beaty, Holland, & Lenat, 2017; North Carolina; Slate Belt; eastern Nearctic; Southeast; North Carolina Biotic Index; Fontinalis INTRODUCTION Hitchcock (1974), Stark and Gaufin (1978), and Identification of adult eastern Nearctic species Unzicker and McCaskill (1982). Recently, Stark of Isoperla Banks, 1906 has historically relied on (2017) has published a new regional key for larvae several disjunct regional keys authored by Frison known from the southeastern United States. (1935, 1942), Hitchcock (1974), Stark and Gaufin However, there are still many species whose larvae (1978), and Poulton & Stewart (1991). This has are unknown, undescribed, or were described after made species determinations of Isoperla difficult the above treatments (see James 1974, Nelson 1976, due to the non-overlapping geographical nature of Nelson & Kondratieff 1983, Grubbs & Szczytko the treatments. Identification of southeastern 2010, Verdone & Kondratieff 2016). U.S.A. species of Isoperla, in both the adult and A recent revision of the Isoperlinae by Szczytko larval stage, have typically been attempted using & Kondratieff (2015a) provided the first Illiesia – http://illiesia.speciesfile.org Volume 13 – Number 14 – Page 140 Beaty, S.R., V.B. Holland, & D.R. Lenat. 2017. Isoperla arcana and Isoperla borisi (Plecoptera: Perlodidae), two new stonefly species from North Carolina, U.S.A. with notes on the distribution of Isoperla powhatan. Illiesia, 13(14):140-166. https://doi.org/10.25031/2017/13.14 comprehensive treatment of all known Isoperla Isoperla not treated in Szczytko & Kondratieff occurring in eastern North America. This (2015a). Numerous larvae of these species, herein extensively illustrated monograph and its named I. arcana sp. nov. and I. borisi sp. nov., have companion photographic atlas, Szczytko & been collected over the last 30 years by North Kondratieff (2015b), recognizes 60 Isoperla species Carolina’s Biological Assessment Branch of the as occurring in eastern North America. Previously Division of Water Resources during routine water 41 eastern Nearctic species of Isoperla were known quality bioassessments in headwater streams of the (Szczytko & Kondratieff 2015a). In addition to Appalachian Mountains and streams of the providing amended descriptions of the males, Carolina Slate Belt (Griffith et al. 2002), females, and eggs of all previously known species, respectively. At least one more undescribed species Szczytko and Kondratieff (2015a) described 22 new of Isoperla is known to occur in North Carolina but species and proposed three new synonymies. They requires additional material before a formal analyzed the taxonomic status of the 60 valid description can be completed. eastern North American Isoperla species based Finally, numerous adult male specimens of the primarily on adult morphology and placed 53 recently described species, Isoperla powhatan species into 12 species groups, leaving seven Szczytko & Kondratieff, 2015 were reared from a species unassigned. However, as Szczytko and single North Carolina piedmont stream and Kondratieff (2015a) noted, the phylogenetic represent a significant southern range extension for relationships among many Isoperla species remain this species. unclear as certain life stages, particularly the larvae, of numerous species are unknown or MATERIALS AND METHODS undescribed. As part of a larger ecological study, The Isoperla fauna of North Carolina presently unidentified Isoperla larvae were collected during includes 30 recognized species, 15 of which are the springs of 2012–2016 from various Appalachian newly described (Szczytko & Kondratieff 2015a, mountain streams as well as both Collins Creek, a Verdone & Kondratieff 2017, DeWalt et al. 2017) small North Carolina Slate Belt stream and Barnes and is easily the most species-rich stonefly genus in Creek, a mid-order slate belt stream. the state (Beaty 2015). Kondratieff et al. (1995) Supplementary trips were made during late April provided the first comprehensive list of Isoperla in and early May of 2015 and 2016 to collect North Carolina (Table 1), totaling only 14 species of additional adult Isoperla specimens. Isoperla at that time. Four species recorded from Adult Isoperla were collected by beating sheet in North Carolina by Kondratieff et al. (1995), Isoperla riparian vegetation while pre-emergent Isoperla bilineata (Say, 1823); I. distincta Nelson, 1976; I. larvae were collected from in-stream habitat using namata Frison, 1942; and I. similis (Hagen, 1861), dip nets and bucket sieves. Larvae were sorted were not confirmed as valid North Carolina streamside from moss and detritus using modified records by Szczytko & Kondratieff (2015a) likely plastic pipettes and were placed in an aerated caused by misidentification of larvae of cryptic cooler containing ice for transport back to the species. In addition, Szczytko and Kondratieff laboratory. Concurrent with larval collection, (2015a) provide the first North Carolina published approximately 50 liters of stream water, stream records of I. montana Banks, 1898, although these conditioned leaves, and gravel were collected for records may refer to either I. kirchneri Szczytko and use in artificial flumes during rearing. At the Kondratieff, 2015 or I. dewalti, a species recently laboratory, live pre-emergent Isoperla larvae were described from the southern Appalachians by sorted out for rearing with the remaining larvae Verdone and Kondratieff (2017). preserved in 80% ethanol for later examination. During the course of rearing and associating Along with a small leaf pack cleaned of resident larval stoneflies in North Carolina, the authors competitors, up to 3 pre-emergent larvae were discovered two previously unknown species of placed into a small plastic cup with screened sides Illiesia – http://illiesia.speciesfile.org Volume 13 – Number 14 – Page 141 Beaty, S.R., V.B. Holland, & D.R. Lenat. 2017. Isoperla arcana and Isoperla borisi (Plecoptera: Perlodidae), two new stonefly species from North Carolina, U.S.A. with notes on the distribution of Isoperla powhatan. Illiesia, 13(14):140-166. https://doi.org/10.25031/2017/13.14 1 Fig. 1. Artificial stream used in rearing immature aquatic insects in the laboratory. and enclosed with a tented screen top. Stream alive for 48–72 hours after emergence to allow for gravel was used to weigh down the leaf substrate complete hardening and darkening of the and provide refuge. Chambers were subsequently exoskeleton. Some males and females were placed floated on the water surface of a small artificial together for mating in an attempt to yield mature stream leaving the screened tented area of the ova. rearing cup above the surface of the water for the Reared females were placed in 80% ethanol emergent adult. along with the associated exuvia while live males The artificial stream (Fig. 1) was constructed of were prepared for aedeagal eversion. Eversion of a modified 55 liter cooler with a central Plexiglas™ the aedeagus was performed using a divider and two internal pumps to provide stereomicroscope to ensure complete and full circulation. Water temperature, controlled and extrusion. Upon successful eversion, specimens maintained by an attached water chiller (Aqua were immersed into near-boiling water to fix the Euro US Max Chill), was set to simulate field aedeagus in place. surface water temperatures. Room lighting was Preserved larvae and exuvia were examined at controlled by an integrated automatic timer to 20–40X and photographed using a Lumenera® provide a natural diurnal cycle in an approximate Infinity 1–5C camera attached to a Leica® MZ6 14:10 hour light: dark cycle. Successfully reared stereomicroscope. The maxillae and legs from specimens were collected, along with the exuvia, preserved larvae and exuvia were slide mounted
Recommended publications
  • Isoperla Bilineata (Group)
    Steven R Beaty Biological Assessment Branch North Carolina Division of Water Resources [email protected] 2 DISCLAIMER: This manual is unpublished material. The information contained herein is provisional and is intended only to provide a starting point for the identification of Isoperla within North Carolina. While many of the species treated here can be found in other eastern and southeastern states, caution is advised when attempting to identify Isoperla outside of the study area. Revised and corrected versions are likely to follow. The user assumes all risk and responsibility of taxonomic determinations made in conjunction with this manual. Recommended Citation Beaty, S. R. 2015. A morass of Isoperla nymphs (Plecoptera: Perlodidae) in North Carolina: a photographic guide to their identification. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Resources, Biological Assessment Branch, Raleigh. Nymphs used in this study were reared and associated at the NCDENR Biological Assessment Branch lab (BAB) unless otherwise noted. All photographs in this manual were taken by the Eric Fleek (habitus photos) and Steve Beaty (lacinial photos) unless otherwise noted. They may be used with proper credit. 3 Keys and Literature for eastern Nearctic Isoperla Nymphs Frison, T. H. 1935. The Stoneflies, or Plecoptera, of Illinois. Illinois Natural History Bulletin 20(4): 281-471. • while not containing species of isoperlids that occur in NC, it does contain valuable habitus and mouthpart illustrations of species that are similar to those found in NC (I. bilineata, I richardsoni) Frison, T. H. 1942. Studies of North American Plecoptera with special reference to the fauna of Illinois. Illinois Natural History Bulletin 22(2): 235-355.
    [Show full text]
  • Stoneflies^ Or Plecoptera, of Illinois
    STATE OF ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION DIVISION OF THE NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY THEODORE H. PRISON. Chiij Vol. XX BULLETIN Article IV The Stoneflies^ or Plecoptera, of Illinois THKODORE H. FRISON PRINTED BY AUTHORITY OP THE STATE OF ILLINOIS URBANA, ILLINOIS JANUARY 1935 STATE OF ILLINOIS Honorable Henry Horner, Governor DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION Honorable John J. Hallihan, Dirertor BOARD OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION - ! Honorable John J. Hallihan, Chairman William Trelease, D. Sc, LL. D., Biology William A. Noyes, Ph. D., LL. D., Chemistry Henry C. Cowles, Ph. D., D. Sc, Forestry Chem. D., D. Sc, John W. Alvord, C. E., Engineering Edson C. Bastxn, Ph. D., Geology Arthur Cutts Willard, D. Eng., LL. D., President of the University of Illinois NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY DIVISION URBANA, ILLINOIS Scientific and Technical Staff Theodore H. Prison, Ph. D., Chief SECTION OF economic ENTOMOLOGY SECTION OF INSECT SURVEY W. P. Flint, B. S., Chief Entomologist H. H. Ross, Ph. D., Systematic En- C. C. CoMPTON, M. S., Associate En- tomologist tomologist Carl O. Mohr, Ph. D., Associate En- M. D. Farrar, Ph. D., Research E.n- tomologist, Artist tomologist L. H. TowNSEND, M. S., Assistant En- tomologist S. C. Chandler, B. S., Sontheni Field Entomologist J. H. Bigger, B. S., Central Field SECTION OF APPLIED BOTANY AND Entomologist PLANT PATHOLOGY L. H. Shropshire, M. S., Northern L. Ph. D., Botanist Field Entomologist R. Tehon, C. Carter, Ph. D., Assistant Bota- E. R. McGovran, Ph. D., Research J. nist Fellow in Entomology G. H. BoEWE, M. S., Field Botanist W. E.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Insects: Bryophyte Roles As Habitats
    Glime, J. M. 2017. Aquatic insects: Bryophyte roles as habitats. Chapt. 11-2. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 2. 11-2-1 Bryological Interaction. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 19 July 2020 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology2/>. CHAPTER 11-2 AQUATIC INSECTS: BRYOPHYTE ROLES AS HABITATS TABLE OF CONTENTS Potential Roles .................................................................................................................................................. 11-2-2 Refuge ............................................................................................................................................................... 11-2-4 Habitat Diversity and Substrate Variability ...................................................................................................... 11-2-4 Nutrients ..................................................................................................................................................... 11-2-5 Substrate Size ............................................................................................................................................. 11-2-5 Stability ...................................................................................................................................................... 11-2-6 pH Relationships .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Georeferenced Probabilistic Risk Assessment of Pesticides
    TEXTE 05/2014 Georeferenced Probabil- istic Risk Assessment of Pesticides – Further Advances in Assessing the Risk to Aquatic Ecosystems by Spray Drift from Permanent Crops | TEXTE | 05/2014 ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH OF THE FEDERAL MINISTRY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT, NATURE CONSERVATION, BUILDING AND NUCLEAR SAFETY Project No. (FKZ) 3707 63 4001 Report No. (UBA-FB) 001740/E Georeferenced Probabilistic Risk Assessment of Pesticides – Further Advances in Assessing the Risk to Aquatic Ecosystems by Spray Drift from Permanent Crops by Kubiak R. & Hommen U., Bach M., Classen S., Gergs A., Golla B., Guerniche D., Klein M., Krumpe J., Preuss TG., Ratte HAT., Roß-Nickol M., Schäfers C., Strauss T., Toschki A., Trapp M. Project coordination Prof. Dr. Roland Kubiak Institute of Agroecology, RLP Agroscience, Neustadt a.d. Weinstraße Dr. Udo Hommen Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Apllied Ecology, Schmallenberg On behalf of the Federal Environment Agency (Germany) UMWELTBUNDESAMT Imprint Publisher: Umweltbundesamt Wörlitzer Platz 1 06844 Dessau-Roßlau Tel.: 0340/2103-0 Telefax: 0340/2103 2285 [email protected] Internet: www.umweltbundesamt.de http://fuer-mensch-und-umwelt.de/ www.facebook.com/umweltbundesamt.de www.twitter.com/umweltbundesamt Study performed by: Consortium under the leadership of: RLP AgroScience GmbH Institut für Agrarökologie Breitenweg 71 67435 Neustadt Study completed in: October 2011 Edited by: Section IV 1.3 Plant Protection Products Alexandra Müller Steffen Matezki Publikation as pdf: http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen/georeferenced-probabilistic-risk- assessment-of ISSN 1862-4804 Dessau-Roßlau, February 2014 Vorwort Das Umweltbundesamt unterstützt die Entwicklung von landschaftsbezogenen proba- bilistischen Methoden in der Umweltrisikobewertung von Pestiziden bereits seit 20031 mit eigenen Beiträgen einschließlich der Vergabe von Forschungsvorhaben.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Species of Isoperla Banks (Plecoptera: Perlodidae) from the Southern Appalachians, with Notes on the I
    Verdone, C.J. and B.C. Kondratieff. 2017. A new species of Isoperla Banks (Plecoptera: Perlodidae) from the southern Appalachians, with notes on the I. montana group. Illiesia, 13(12):111-126. https://doi.org/10.25031/2017/13.12 http://zoobank.org/ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:39554E35-3E42-4BC1-AF04-3DC5ABD92DAC A NEW SPECIES OF ISOPERLA BANKS (PLECOPTERA: PERLODIDAE) FROM THE SOUTHERN APPALACHIANS, WITH NOTES ON THE I. MONTANA GROUP Chris J. Verdone1 and Boris C. Kondratieff1 1 Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT A new species, Isoperla dewalti Verdone & Kondratieff, 2017, is described from the Appalachian Mountains of North Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia. The new species is proposed based on details of the male aedeagus, paraprocts, vesicle, general body coloration, female subgenital plate, and uniqueness of the ovum chorion. Supporting data includes color images and scanning electron micrographs. Isoperla smithi Szczytko and Kondratieff, 2015 is synonymized with I. nelsoni Szczytko and Kondratieff, 2015 based on examination of additional material. Previously unreported records of I. montana (Banks, 1898) and I. nelsoni are presented. Keywords: Plecoptera, stonefly, Perlodidae, Isoperla dewalti Verdone & Kondratieff, 2017, Appalachian Mountains, Great Smoky Mountain National Park, North Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia INTRODUCTION Remarkably, an additional undescribed species of Isoperla Banks is the most diverse Plecoptera Isoperla was recently discovered while studying the genus in the Nearctic Region with 84 described conservation status of stonefly species in the species (DeWalt et al. 2017). Szczytko and southern Appalachians of North Carolina, Kondratieff (2015) recently described 22 new species Tennessee, and Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Outlook
    Joey Steil From: Leslie Jordan <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 1:13 PM To: Angela Ruberto Subject: Potential Environmental Beneficial Users of Surface Water in Your GSA Attachments: Paso Basin - County of San Luis Obispo Groundwater Sustainabilit_detail.xls; Field_Descriptions.xlsx; Freshwater_Species_Data_Sources.xls; FW_Paper_PLOSONE.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S1.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S2.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S3.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S4.pdf CALIFORNIA WATER | GROUNDWATER To: GSAs We write to provide a starting point for addressing environmental beneficial users of surface water, as required under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). SGMA seeks to achieve sustainability, which is defined as the absence of several undesirable results, including “depletions of interconnected surface water that have significant and unreasonable adverse impacts on beneficial users of surface water” (Water Code §10721). The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is a science-based, nonprofit organization with a mission to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends. Like humans, plants and animals often rely on groundwater for survival, which is why TNC helped develop, and is now helping to implement, SGMA. Earlier this year, we launched the Groundwater Resource Hub, which is an online resource intended to help make it easier and cheaper to address environmental requirements under SGMA. As a first step in addressing when depletions might have an adverse impact, The Nature Conservancy recommends identifying the beneficial users of surface water, which include environmental users. This is a critical step, as it is impossible to define “significant and unreasonable adverse impacts” without knowing what is being impacted. To make this easy, we are providing this letter and the accompanying documents as the best available science on the freshwater species within the boundary of your groundwater sustainability agency (GSA).
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio USA Stoneflies (Insecta, Plecoptera): Species Richness
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 178:Ohio 1–26 (2012)USA stoneflies (Insecta, Plecoptera): species richness estimation, distribution... 1 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.178.2616 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Ohio USA stoneflies (Insecta, Plecoptera): species richness estimation, distribution of functional niche traits, drainage affiliations, and relationships to other states R. Edward DeWalt1, Yong Cao1, Tari Tweddale1, Scott A. Grubbs2, Leon Hinz1, Massimo Pessino1, Jason L. Robinson1 1 University of Illinois, Prairie Research Institute, Illinois Natural History Survey, 1816 S Oak St., Cham- paign, IL 61820 2 Western Kentucky University, Department of Biology and Center for Biodiversity Studies, Thompson Complex North Wing 107, Bowling Green, KY 42101 Corresponding author: R. Edward DeWalt ([email protected].) Academic editor: C. Geraci | Received 31 December 2011 | Accepted 19 March 2012 | Published 29 March 2012 Citation: DeWalt RE, Cao Y, Tweddale T, Grubbs SA, Hinz L, Pessino M, Robinson JL (2012) Ohio USA stoneflies (Insecta, Plecoptera): species richness estimation, distribution of functional niche traits, drainage affiliations, and relationships to other states. ZooKeys 178: 1–26. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.178.2616 Abstract Ohio is an eastern USA state that historically was >70% covered in upland and mixed coniferous for- est; about 60% of it glaciated by the Wisconsinan glacial episode. Its stonefly fauna has been studied in piecemeal fashion until now. The assemblage of Ohio stoneflies was assessed from over 4,000 records accumulated from 18 institutions, new collections, and trusted literature sources. Species richness totaled 102 with estimators Chao2 and ICE Mean predicting 105.6 and 106.4, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Plecoptera: Perlodidae), a Holarctic Stonefly Confirmedr F Om Lake Superior, with a Review and First Checklist of the Stoneflies of Michigan
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 34 Number 2 - Fall/Winter 2001 Number 2 - Fall/ Article 10 Winter 2001 October 2001 Arcynopteryx Compacta (Plecoptera: Perlodidae), A Holarctic Stonefly Confirmedr F om Lake Superior, With a Review and First Checklist of the Stoneflies of Michigan Scott A. Grubbs Western Kentucky University Ethan Bright University of Michigan Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Grubbs, Scott A. and Bright, Ethan 2001. "Arcynopteryx Compacta (Plecoptera: Perlodidae), A Holarctic Stonefly Confirmedr F om Lake Superior, With a Review and First Checklist of the Stoneflies of Michigan," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 34 (2) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol34/iss2/10 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Grubbs and Bright: <i>Arcynopteryx Compacta</i> (Plecoptera: Perlodidae), A Holarcti 2001 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 77 ARCYNOPTERYX COMPACTA (PLECOPTERA: PERLODIDAE), A HOLARCTIC STONEFLY CONFIRMED FROM LAKE SUPERIOR, WITH A REVIEW AND FIRST CHECKLIST OF 'rHE STONEFLIES OF MICHIGAN Scott A. Grubbs' and Ethan Bright2 ABSTRACT Arcynopteryx compacta, a northern Holarctic species, is confirmed from Lake Superior along the Keweenaw Peninsula of Michigan's Upper Peninsula. A checklist of stoneflies ofMichigan is provided, reporting 58 species plus a list of an additional 19 species that are likely to occur in the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Insecta, Plecoptera) of Maryland, Including New and Emended State Records and an Updated State Checklist
    Grubbs, S.A. 2018. An update on the stonefly fauna (Insecta, Plecoptera) of Maryland, including new and emended state records and an updated state checklist. Illiesia, 14(04):65-80. https://doi.org/10.25031/2018/14.04 http://zoobank.org/ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D522B9EC-BAA9-49FD-AC24- 01BFF6627203 AN UPDATE ON THE STONEFLY FAUNA (INSECTA, PLECOPTERA) OF MARYLAND, INCLUDING NEW AND EMENDED STATE RECORDS AND AN UPDATED STATE CHECKLIST Scott A. Grubbs1 1 Department of Biology and Center for Biodiversity Studies, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, Kentucky 42101, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The stonefly fauna of Maryland is updated. An unassociated female of Perlesta Banks, 1906 is described under informal designation, complete with light microscopy micrographs of head and pronotal pigmentation patterns plus scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of eggs. New state records are presented for Cultus verticalis (Banks, 1920), Neoperla catharae Stark & Baumann, 1978, and P. mihucorum Kondratieff & Myers, 2011. Light microscopy and SEM micrographs are also presented for P. mihucorum. Published state records of Isoperla Banks, 1906 and Sweltsa onkos (Ricker, 1952) are emended given recent descriptions in both genera. Distribution maps for S. onkos and S. hoffmani Kondratieff & Kirchner, 2009, plus for all species of Isoperla and Perlesta known to occur in the Appalachian Mountain region of western Maryland, are provided. An updated state checklist of 114 species is included. Keywords: Plecoptera, Perlidae, Perlesta, state records, Maryland INTRODUCTION on the Maryland fauna have been included in Information on the stonefly fauna of Maryland systematic treatments of Allocapnia Claassen, 1928 was based initially on the species lists in Duffield & (Grubbs & Sheldon 2008), Leuctra Stephens, 1836 Nelson (1990) and Grubbs (1997), and now easily (Grubbs 2015, Grubbs & Wei 2017), Prostoia Ricker, searchable as a “Faunal list” in DeWalt et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Headwaters: the SCIENTIFIC BASIS for SAFEGUARDING STREAM and RIVER ECOSYSTEMS
    Protecting Headwaters: THE SCIENTIFIC BASIS FOR SAFEGUARDING STREAM AND RIVER ECOSYSTEMS A Research Synthesis from the Stroud™ Water Research Center Small headwater streams like this one are the lifeblood of our streams and rivers. Protecting these headwaters is essential to preserving a healthy freshwater ecosystem and protecting our freshwater resources. About THE STROUD WATER RESEARCH CENTER The Stroud Water Research Center seeks to advance knowledge and stewardship of fresh water through research, education and global outreach and to help businesses, landowners, policy makers and individuals make informed decisions that affect water quality and availability around the world. The Stroud Water Research Center is an independent, 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. For more information go to www.stroudcenter.org. Sierra Club provided partial support for writing this white paper. Editing and executive summary by Matt Freeman. Contributors STROUD WATER RESEARCH CENTER SCIENTISTS AUTHORED PROTECTING HEADWATERS Louis A. Kaplan Senior Research Scientist Thomas L. Bott Vice President Senior Research Scientist John K. Jackson Senior Research Scientist J. Denis Newbold Research Scientist Bernard W. Sweeney Director President Senior Research Scientist For a downloadable, printer-ready copy of this document go to: http://www.stroudcenter.org/research/PDF/ProtectingHeadwaters.pdf. For a downloadable, printer-ready copy of the Executive Summary only, go to: http://www.stroudcenter.org/research/PDF/ProtectingHeadwaters_ExecSummary.pdf. 1 STROUD WATER RESEARCH CENTER | PROTECTING HEADWATERS Small headwater streams like this one are the lifeblood of our streams and rivers. Protecting these headwaters is essential to preserving a healthy freshwater ecosystem and protecting our freshwater resources. Executive Summary HEALTHY HEADWATERS ARE ESSENTIAL TO PRESERVE OUR FRESHWATER RESOURCES Scientific evidence clearly shows that healthy headwaters — tributary streams, intermittent streams, and spring seeps — are essential to the health of stream and river ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of the Aquatic Invertebrates of the Delaware River Basin, 1990-2000
    A Checklist of the Aquatic Invertebrates of the Delaware River Basin, 1990-2000 By Michael D. Bilger, Karen Riva-Murray, and Gretchen L. Wall Data Series 116 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2005 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to repro- duce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Bilger, M.D., Riva-Murray, Karen, and Wall, G.L., 2005, A checklist of the aquatic invertebrates of the Delaware River Basin, 1990-2000: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 116, 29 p. iii FOREWORD The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is committed to providing the Nation with accurate and timely sci- entific information that helps enhance and protect the overall quality of life and that facilitates effec- tive management of water, biological, energy, and mineral resources (http://www.usgs.gov/). Informa- tion on the quality of the Nation’s water resources is critical to assuring the long-term availability of water that is safe for drinking and recreation and suitable for industry, irrigation, and habitat for fish and wildlife.
    [Show full text]
  • An Ecological Investigation of Stream Insects in Algonquin Park, Ontario
    UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO STUDIES BIOLOGICAL SERIES, No. 56 AN ECOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF STREAM INSECTS IN ALGONQUIN PARK, ONTARIO By Wm. M. SPRULES (From the Department of Zoology, University of Toronto) PUBLICATIONS OF THE ONTARIO FISHERIES RESEARCH LABORATORY, No. 69 TORONTO UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO PRESS 1947 1 it CONTENTS PAGE Abstract • ......1 Introduction ...................................................................................... 2 Historical Review ............................................................................. 3 Acknowledgments ............................................................................. 4 Description of Drainage Area, Streams and Station Sites ........... 5 Physico-Chemical Conditions ......................................................... 10 Apparatus and Methods ............................................................. 11 Oxygen .......................................................................................... 12 Hydrogen Ion Concentration ..................................................... 13 Type of Bottom ........................................................................... 13 Flow ................................................................................................ 13 Depth ............................................................................................. 14 Colour ............................................................................................ 14 Temperature ................................................................................
    [Show full text]