Causes and Consequences of Australia's

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Causes and Consequences of Australia's 1 Introduction East Timor: an Australian battleground In December 1975, Alarico Fernandes, a Minister in the government of the Democratic Republic of East Timor, broadcast a desperate radio message to Darwin, pleading for international assistance. He reported that Indonesian forces have been landed in Dili by sea… They are flying over Dili dropping out paratroopers… A lot of people have been killed indiscriminately… Women and children are going to be killed by Indonesian forces… we are going to be killed! SOS, we call for your help, this is an urgent call…1 Fernandes’ pleas went unheeded, and perhaps 200,000 of his compatriots would die as a result of the Indonesian occupation. Nearly a quarter of a century later, in September 1999, a distressingly familiar message was delivered by Joao Carrascalao, a representative of the East Timorese independence movement in Australia. He argued that because the East Timorese population had decisively voted for independence from Indonesia, they were now being systematically murdered and that the fascist Indonesian military machine and its civil government collaborators… are well on their way to their target of exterminating 344,580 East Timorese… These people will die, shot, hacked, tortured, raped and starved to death, unless the free, democratic nations of the world confront Indonesia today… please help now. If you don’t, there will be no East Timor tomorrow.2 1 Cited in Jill Jolliffe, East Timor: Nationalism and colonialism, St Lucia, University of Queensland Press, 1978, p. 232. 2 344,580 was the number of ballots cast for independence. Joao Carrascalao, Media release: Indonesia’s ethnic cleansing target: kill 344,580 East Timorese, National Council for Timorese Resistance, 08.09.1999 (accessed 29.05.2006, http://www.labournet.de/internationales/crnt.html). 2 This time though, the response from Australia was very different.3 By the end of September the Australian military had taken control of East Timor. They failed to prevent the deaths of around 1,500 East Timorese, the forced deportation of several hundred thousand people, and widespread physical destruction. But their presence had served as guarantee that East Timor would finally become an independent nation. It is the central concern of this thesis to explain this dramatic change in Australia’s response to East Timor’s suffering. For decades, the half-island of East Timor has been a battleground of Australian foreign policy, both literally and figuratively. Its position in the national consciousness was secured during World War Two, when Australia launched a pre- emptive invasion of the then Portuguese controlled territory, and subsequently engaged in guerilla fighting with Japanese forces. Amidst a chaotic decolonisation process, Indonesia invaded East Timor in 1975. Australia supported the Indonesian occupation until 1999, but it was a bitterly divisive policy domestically, attracting unusually vocal and long-lasting criticism. Indeed, East Timor became emblematic of debates over whether Australian foreign policy should pursue moral goals, or whether it should be conducted according to considerations of pure realpolitik. Australia’s 1999 military intervention provided a far more unifying and positive narrative about its foreign relations. To be sure, there have been debates about exactly why Australia intervened. There has also been no shortage of political recriminations about who might be responsible for the violence and destruction which accompanied East Timor’s independence ballot. Nonetheless, there is a near uniform consensus among commentators that the military deployment was a self- evidently positive development, which represented a fundamental break with previous Australian policy. Moreover, most existing accounts explain this change through the impact of ethical factors arising from outside the normal foreign policy making processes, although a range of differing political actors are ultimately identified as being responsible for the new policy. This consensus makes a fresh assessment of the East Timor intervention an important task for critical scholars of Australian international relations. General popular support for the deployment stood in marked contrast to the political polarisation and 3 The convention of using the country’s name as representative of policy makers is adhered to throughout, except where internal divisions are being emphasised. 3 at times overwhelming opposition with which other aspects of the Howard government’s foreign policy was met, notably its strong support for the United States’ invasion of Iraq. If the intervention in East Timor was indeed driven by substantially different interests to Canberra’s usual international realpolitik, then it would suggest a model for the more general reform of Australian foreign policy. If, however, as this thesis argues, the intervention represented a continuation of previous Australian policy in East Timor by other means, then the Howard government engineered a remarkable political victory, pursuing its own preferred policy while drawing support from those who were more normally its critics. Main argument of the thesis Currently, there are two main explanations of why Australia intervened in East Timor. The first, mainstream explanation is that Australia was motivated by natural and obvious humanitarian concerns for the East Timorese population. A second, more Left-wing position, holds that the Howard government was forced to act against its own wishes by a mass popular campaign, which demanded intervention. In contrast, it is argued here that Canberra’s dispatching of troops to East Timor can be more satisfactorily explained as an act of Australian imperialism, designed to protect Australia’s own security interests. It ensured that East Timor’s transition to independence went as smoothly as possible from that point onwards, and that the new state was relatively stable and friendly towards Australia. As such, while at one level obviously a repudiation of past policy, Australia’s military deployment more fundamentally pursued the same objectives as its earlier support for the Indonesian occupation. Crucial to this argument is a wider understanding of the historical development of Australia’s position within global affairs. To provide this context, this thesis employs a Marxist theory of imperialism, in which the international system is seen as being characterised by unavoidable economic and strategic competition among the major capitalist powers. As a middle ranking power, Australian policy makers are forced to accept the logic of this systematic rivalry, and take for granted that Australia may be drawn into wider conflicts between major powers in the Asia-Pacific region. Nonetheless, Australia is also an imperialist power in its own right, with its 4 significant economic and military power providing a substantial capacity to defend its interests in Southeast Asia and the Southwest Pacific. Most importantly, Australia has sought to ensure the existence of friendly and stable regimes in the Indonesian archipelago. Successive Australian governments have been driven by a fear that if a major power such as Japan or China gained a foothold in this region, it could then threaten Australia’s territory, or sever vital trade and communications routes. Australia’s relations with Indonesia since World War Two have been dominated by this concern, leading to policies as diverse as qualified support for Indonesian independence and strong backing for the Suharto dictatorship. The question of East Timor was subsumed within these wider security interests. Australia supported Indonesia’s invasion of the territory in 1975 not only to further the relationship with Jakarta, but also due to Australia’s own aversion to the creation of a small, strategically vulnerable neighbour. This strategy was reasonably successful as long as the Suharto dictatorship remained intact. By September 1999, however, Indonesian authoritarianism could no longer be relied upon to protect Australia’s strategic interests. Indonesia’s economy was decimated by the Asian financial crisis of 1997-1998, leading to a mass popular movement which forced Suharto to resign in May 1998. At the same time, a new wave of resistance within East Timor itself challenged Jakarta’s control of the territory. Faced with increasing political and financial pressures to resolve the East Timor question, Suharto’s successor BJ Habibie granted an independence referendum. The Indonesian military responded to their defeat in this ballot with a wave of mass killings, physical destruction and forced deportations. Their purpose, however, was not to retain the territory, but to punish the East Timorese population and warn other Indonesian provinces not to challenge Jakarta’s centralised rule. As the ballot approached, Australia was forced to confront the unwelcome reality that East Timor would soon become an independent nation. This was particularly troubling given the uncertain regional situation at the time, which came to be known as the ‘arc of instability’ across Australia’s northern approaches. The possibility that East Timor might become a weak or failed state, vulnerable to great power manipulation or causing further regional unrest, was no more attractive in 1999 than in 1975. 5 From early 1999, the Howard government therefore sought to reconcile two sometimes contradictory interests. On the one hand, Australia wanted the transition to independence to proceed as smoothly as possible, and to ensure that its own interests
Recommended publications
  • Recorder 298.Pages
    RECORDER RecorderOfficial newsletter of the Melbourne Labour History Society (ISSN 0155-8722) Issue No. 298—July 2020 • From Sicily to St Lucia (Review), Ken Mansell, pp. 9-10 IN THIS EDITION: • Oil under Troubled Water (Review), by Michael Leach, pp. 10-11 • Extreme and Dangerous (Review), by Phillip Deery, p. 1 • The Yalta Conference (Review), by Laurence W Maher, pp. 11-12 • The Fatal Lure of Politics (Review), Verity Burgmann, p. 2 • The Boys Who Said NO!, p. 12 • Becoming John Curtin and James Scullin (Review), by Nick Dyrenfurth, pp. 3-4 • NIBS Online, p. 12 • Dorothy Day in Australia, p. 4 • Union Education History Project, by Max Ogden, p. 12 • Tribute to Jack Mundey, by Verity Burgmann, pp. 5-6 • Graham Berry, Democratic Adventurer, p. 12 • Vale Jack Mundey, by Brian Smiddy, p. 7 • Tribune Photographs Online, p. 12 • Batman By-Election, 1962, by Carolyn Allan Smart & Lyle Allan, pp. 7-8 • Melbourne Branch Contacts, p. 12 • Without Bosses (Review), by Brendan McGloin, p. 8 Extreme and Dangerous: The Curious Case of Dr Ian Macdonald Phillip Deery His case parallels that of another medical doctor, Paul Reuben James, who was dismissed by the Department of Although there are numerous memoirs of British and Repatriation in 1950 for opposing the Communist Party American communists written by their children, Dissolution Bill. James was attached to the Reserve Australian communists have attracted far fewer Officers of Command and, to the consternation of ASIO, accounts. We have Ric Throssell’s Wild Weeds and would most certainly have been mobilised for active Wildflowers: The Life and Letters of Katherine Susannah military service were World War III to eventuate, as Pritchard, Roger Milliss’ Serpent’s Tooth, Mark Aarons’ many believed.
    [Show full text]
  • Socialism and the ALP Left
    John Sendy Socialism and the ALP Left THE FEDERAL TAKE-OVER of the Victorian Labor Party, inspired by rightwing policies, ruling class desires and the ambi­ tions of attaining electoral victory at any cost, has proved a grand failure, irrespective of what occurs in the next weeks. The interventionists had a completely unreal estimate of the situation in Victoria and have proved quite unequal to the job undertaken. They in no way realised the depth of support for Hartley, Hogg and their colleagues. Estimating that Hartley, Hogg & Co. would have only a handful of supporters faced with strong-arm tactics, they to a large degree were paralysed by the strength and full-blooded nature of the opposition and defiance which they confronted from a membership sickened by the traditional parliamentary antics of a Whitlam and the hare­ brained, opportunist, power-game manoeuvrings of a Cameron. The idea of reforming the ALP to enhance its 1972 electoral prospects by eliminating “the madmen of Victoria” in exchange for some curbing of the rightwing dominance in NSW was swal­ lowed readily by sundry opportunistic, unprincipled “left wingers" in NSW and Victoria obsessed with positions and “power” and with achieving the “advance” of electing a Labor Government under Whitlam. The “Mad Hatters tea party” of Broken Hill was fol­ lowed by the circus-style orgy of the Travel Lodge Motel in the John Sendy is Victorian Secretary of the Communist Party. This article was written in mid-January. 2 AUSTRALIAN LEFT REVIEW— MARCH, 1971 full glare of television cameras and the shoddy backroom dealings of the dimly lit Chinese cafes of Sydney.
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of White Australia
    The making of White Australia: Ruling class agendas, 1876-1888 Philip Gavin Griffiths A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of The Australian National University December 2006 I declare that the material contained in this thesis is entirely my own work, except where due and accurate acknowledgement of another source has been made. Philip Gavin Griffiths Page v Contents Acknowledgements ix Abbreviations xiii Abstract xv Chapter 1 Introduction 1 A review of the literature 4 A ruling class policy? 27 Methodology 35 Summary of thesis argument 41 Organisation of the thesis 47 A note on words and comparisons 50 Chapter 2 Class analysis and colonial Australia 53 Marxism and class analysis 54 An Australian ruling class? 61 Challenges to Marxism 76 A Marxist theory of racism 87 Chapter 3 Chinese people as a strategic threat 97 Gold as a lever for colonisation 105 The Queensland anti-Chinese laws of 1876-77 110 The ‘dangers’ of a relatively unsettled colonial settler state 126 The Queensland ruling class galvanised behind restrictive legislation 131 Conclusion 135 Page vi Chapter 4 The spectre of slavery, or, who will do ‘our’ work in the tropics? 137 The political economy of anti-slavery 142 Indentured labour: The new slavery? 149 The controversy over Pacific Islander ‘slavery’ 152 A racially-divided working class: The real spectre of slavery 166 Chinese people as carriers of slavery 171 The ruling class dilemma: Who will do ‘our’ work in the tropics? 176 A divided continent? Parkes proposes to unite the south 183 Conclusion
    [Show full text]
  • Full Thesis Draft No Pics
    A whole new world: Global revolution and Australian social movements in the long Sixties Jon Piccini BA Honours (1st Class) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2013 School of History, Philosophy, Religion & Classics Abstract This thesis explores Australian social movements during the long Sixties through a transnational prism, identifying how the flow of people and ideas across borders was central to the growth and development of diverse campaigns for political change. By making use of a variety of sources—from archives and government reports to newspapers, interviews and memoirs—it identifies a broadening of the radical imagination within movements seeking rights for Indigenous Australians, the lifting of censorship, women’s liberation, the ending of the war in Vietnam and many others. It locates early global influences, such as the Chinese Revolution and increasing consciousness of anti-racist struggles in South Africa and the American South, and the ways in which ideas from these and other overseas sources became central to the practice of Australian social movements. This was a process aided by activists’ travel. Accordingly, this study analyses the diverse motives and experiences of Australian activists who visited revolutionary hotspots from China and Vietnam to Czechoslovakia, Algeria, France and the United States: to protest, to experience or to bring back lessons. While these overseas exploits, breathlessly recounted in articles, interviews and books, were transformative for some, they also exposed the limits of what a transnational politics could achieve in a local setting. Australia also became a destination for the period’s radical activists, provoking equally divisive responses.
    [Show full text]
  • Development and Its Discontents: the Indonesian Government, Indonesian Opposition, and the Occupation of East Timor
    Development and its Discontents: The Indonesian Government, Indonesian Opposition, and the Occupation of East Timor M. Scott Selders Based on a section of M. Scott Selders, “Patterns of Violence: Narratives of Occupied East Timor from Invasion to Independence, 1975-1999” (MA thesis, Concordia University, 2008). IAGS 9th Biennial Conference, Buenos Aires, July 2011 In 1974, decolonization began in Portugal’s colony of East Timor.1 In December 1975, this process was curtailed by neighboring Indonesia’s invasion, after which President Suharto’s New Order regime imposed a brutal occupation lasting until 1999. Between 1974 and 1999, it is estimated that over 100,000, and possibly as many as 183,000, East Timorese perished.2 The Indonesian government justified the invasion by reminding its Western allies of the Suharto regime’s staunch anti-Communism and by arguing that East Timor’s small size, poverty, and underdevelopment meant it was not a viable independent country.3 Consequently, after 1975, one of Indonesia’s main justifications for the occupation was that it was balancing the neglect of the Portuguese colonial administration by modernizing East Timor and the Timorese. This paper examines a sample of this development rhetoric from the 1980s. It also shows that such rhetoric was not universally accepted, even within Indonesia, as evidenced by two Indonesian sources from the early 1990s that directly question and contradict the Indonesian government’s civilizing claims. The Indonesian provenance of these 1 Standard surveys include Jill Jolliffe, East Timor: Nationalism and Colonialism (St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press, 1978); John G. Taylor, Indonesia’s Forgotten War: The Hidden History of East Timor (London: Zed Books, 1991); James Dunn, Timor: A People Betrayed (Sydney: ABC Books, 1996); Arnold S.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Up the New Channels'
    VOLUME V ❖ ISSUE 2: UQ CENTENARY ❖ 2011 ❖ 75–86 An interdisciplinary journal for the study of history, philosophy, religion, and classics ‘Up the new channels’ STUDENT ACTIVI S M IN BRI sba NE DURING AU S TR A LI A ’S SIXTIE S Jon Piccini This paper seeks to locate the development of Brisbane’s New Left student movement within a growing body of transna- tional studies on ‘the sixties.’ In particular, it focuses on the interrelation between global issues such as the Vietnam War and the local realities of Queensland under the supposedly oppressive and philistine Country-Liberal government, and the role this played in cultivating a radical practice during the sixties and seventies. Appropriations of urban space, both on and off-campus, were vital to youth activists fashioning oppositional identities within the parameters of this transnational mediation. Foco Club, headquartered in what was then Trades Hall, provided a place for youth entertainment and political involvement on an otherwise culturally-sterile Sunday night, while students’ continued attempts to redefine The University of Queensland as a space for struggle, saw a variety of interlinked contestations with the state, administration and other, less radical, students. An important, if overlooked, period of Brisbane’s youth history is thus contextualised, placing the city firmly within a developing narrative of the transnational sixties. Oh yes, we all know that young people are hedonistic and naive, and perpetually dissatisfied. But the joke is that the dissatisfaction is starting to be articulated.1 n 1970, several dozen Brisbane activists collectively published a wide-ranging assault on the capitalist Iuniversity, using as a case study their base at The University of Queensland.
    [Show full text]
  • AUSTRALIAN and INDONESIAN NEWS COVERAGE of the Dili MASSACRE
    AUSTRALIAN AND INDONESIAN NEWS COVERAGE OF THE DILi MASSACRE ( A Content Analysis of Australian and Indonesian Newspapers from 1 July 1991 to 31 March 1992) ' Yuventius Agustinus Nunung Prajarto A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts SCHOOL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE FACULTY OF ARTS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA 1994 iv AUSTRALIAlf ARD IImOHBSIAN IIEWS COVERAGE OP TBB DILI IIASSACRB (A content Analysis of Australian and Indonesian Newspapers frOII 1 July 1991 to 31 Karch 1992) SCHOOL OP POLITICAL SCIENCE FACULTY OP AR'l' ARD SOCIAL SCIENCES THE UNIVERSITY OP REif SOUTH WALES 1994 V AUSTRALIAN AIID IRDONBSIAN NEWS COVERAGE OF TIIB DILI MASSACRE (A Content Analysis of Australian and Indonesian Newspapers fr0111 July 1991 to 31 Karch 1992) Yuventius Agustinus Hunung Prajarto Thesis POLITICAL SCIENCE 1994 STATEMENT Name : Yuventius Agustinus Nunung Prajarto student No.: 2114322 School of Political science Faculty of Arts and social Sciences University of New south Wales I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, it contains no material previously published or written by another person nor material which to a substantial extent has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma of a university or other institute of higher learning, except where due acknowledgement is made in the text. Date : 8 Febr~y 1994 Signatu ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are a number of people whom I can thank by name. I am particularly grateful to Rodney Smith, my supervisor. His help was invaluable in guiding the process of this research till its finishing touch.
    [Show full text]
  • Katherine Thomson
    What I Wrote: Katherine Thomson A STUDY GUIDE by KATY MARRINER Snodger Media and Ronin Films http://www.theeducationshop.com.au Introduction the screenplay for the film Unfolding Florence – The Many Lives of Florence This study guide to accompany What Broadhurst. She has been Vice-Pres- I Wrote: Katherine Thomson has been ident of the Australian Writers’ Guild written for senior secondary students. and President of Sydney PEN. It provides information and sugges- tions for learning activities in English, About the filmmakers Literature, Theatre Studies and Drama. Dr Tess Brady – Presenter What I Wrote: Katherine Thomson is a Dr Tess Brady is a highly respected short film about Australian playwright editor, researcher and teacher of writ- Katherine Thomson. Dr Tess Brady in- ing at university level. She was the terviews Thomson and provides a criti- co-founding editor of the international cal introduction to Harbour, Answered online scholarly journal TEXT and has by Fire, Mavis Goes to Timor and published children’s picture books, Wonderlands. What I Wrote: Katherine adult radio drama, crime fiction, short Thomson also includes a discussion of stories and popular non-fiction. Her some of Thomson’s other plays and an most recent publication is Creative investigation of her approach to writing Writing: Theory beyond practice, with for the stage. Nigel Krauth. What I Wrote: Katherine Thomson Catherine Gough-Brady – is one title from a four-part series Director spotlighting Australian playwrights. Catherine Gough-Brady is a documen- The series offers students information tary filmmaker. She has made works about the ideas and processes of the for a variety of media.
    [Show full text]
  • Communism and the Australian Labour Movement 1920-1955
    Robin Gollan RevolutionariesGollan • and ReformistsRobin Communism has played a central part in Australian political nightmares for over half a century. Yet it has received scant serious attention comparable in scope and perspec­ tive with this work. This book places the Communist Party of Australia firmly in its political context, national and international, from the 1920s to the mid-1950s. It is important in its in­ sights into the general history of Australian radicalism; its contribution to Australian history, especially labour history; and its placing of radical Australian history in a Communism and the Australian Labour world context. It is written from the per­ spective of one who joined the Communist Movement 1920-1955 Party of Australia because it seemed the only party 'committed to the struggle for socialism and against fascism' and who left it because Robin Gollan this 'no longer seemed the case'. Its breadth, perceptiveness, and understanding com­ mend it to all people concerned w ith the con­ tinuing political struggles of the Right, the Left, and the Centre. Robin Gollan RevolutionariesGollan • and ReformistsRobin Communism has played a central part in Australian political nightmares for over half a century. Yet it has received scant serious attention comparable in scope and perspec­ tive with this work. This book places the Communist Party of Australia firmly in its political context, national and international, from the 1920s to the mid-1950s. It is important in its in­ sights into the general history of Australian radicalism; its contribution to Australian history, especially labour history; and its placing of radical Australian history in a Communism and the Australian Labour world context.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Fall of Australian Maoism
    The Rise and Fall of Australian Maoism By Xiaoxiao Xie Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Asian Studies School of Social Science Faculty of Arts University of Adelaide October 2016 Table of Contents Declaration II Abstract III Acknowledgments V Glossary XV Chapter One Introduction 01 Chapter Two Powell’s Flowing ‘Rivers of Blood’ and the Rise of the ‘Dark Nations’ 22 Chapter Three The ‘Wind from the East’ and the Birth of the ‘First’ Australian Maoists 66 Chapter Four ‘Revolution Is Not a Dinner Party’ 130 Chapter Five ‘Things Are Beginning to Change’: Struggles Against the turning Tide in Australia 178 Chapter Six ‘Continuous Revolution’ in the name of ‘Mango Mao’ and the ‘death’ of the last Australian Maoist 220 Conclusion 260 Bibliography 265 I Declaration I certify that this work contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in my name, in any university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. In addition, I certify that no part of this work will, in the future, be used in a submission in my name, for any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution without the prior approval of the University of Adelaide and where applicable, any partner institution responsible for the joint-award of this degree. I give consent to this copy of my thesis, when deposited in the University Library, being made available for loan and photocopying, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968.
    [Show full text]
  • Dili Massacre and How It Backfired, I Popular Support
    Brian Martin, Justice Ignited, chapter 3 (author’s prepublication version) 3 Dili On 12 November 1991, Indonesian troops colonies — such as Angola and Mozambique gunned down hundreds of peaceful protesters — to gain independence. in Dili, the capital of East Timor. This act was In East Timor, Portugal’s most remote intended to intimidate opponents of Indonesian colony, with a population of nearly 700,000, rule. But instead, the killings triggered a huge rival political forces struggled for supremacy increase in international support for East in the transition from Portuguese rule, with the Timor’s independence. In order to understand liberation movement Fretilin having most the Dili massacre and how it backfired, I popular support. In December 1975, Indone- review its background and aftermath, giving sian military forces invaded and occupied East special attention to the five methods attackers Timor. According to some commentators, the use to inhibit outrage. Indonesian government had obtained agree- Most of the archipelago today called ment for the operation from the Australian and Indonesia was previously a colony of the U.S. governments.2 Fretilin fought the inva- Netherlands. Indonesia obtained its independ- sion but soon retreated to the mountains where ence in 1949. The new government, led by it maintained a guerrilla resistance to the Sukarno, fostered a strong sense of national- Indonesian occupiers. ism. In 1965, there was a military coup, The invasion and occupation were bloody, accompanied by a massive anticommunist with many fighters and civilians killed. purge, with hundreds of thousands of people Indonesian forces perpetrated serious human killed.1 The new regime, led by General rights violations, including torture, rape, and Suharto, was ideologically procapitalist, but it killing of civilians; Fretilin did the same, retained its predecessor’s strong nationalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Darwin University Screening East Timorese Women and History
    Charles Darwin University Screening East Timorese Women and History in Timor-Leste's Beatriz's War Hearman, Vannessa Published in: Gender and History DOI: 10.1111/1468-0424.12380 Published: 01/10/2018 Document Version Early version, also known as pre-print Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Hearman, V. (2018). Screening East Timorese Women and History in Timor-Leste's Beatriz's War. Gender and History, 30(3), 786-802. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0424.12380 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 01. Oct. 2021 This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article: Hearman, V. (2018), Screening East Timorese Women and History in Timor‐Leste's Beatriz's War. Gender & History, 30: 786-802. doi:10.1111/1468-0424.12380, which has been published in final form at https:// doi.org/10.1111/1468-0424.12380.
    [Show full text]