DOCSLIB.ORG

Free PDF Download

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Free PDF Download European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences 2019; 23: 3-15 Use of cognitive enhancers: methylphenidate and analogs J. CARLIER1, R. GIORGETTI2, M.R. VARÌ3, F. PIRANI2, G. RICCI4, F.P. BUSARDÒ2 1Unit of Forensic Toxicology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy 2Section of Legal Medicine, Universita Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy 3National Centre on Addiction and Doping, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy 4School of Law, University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy Abstract. – OBJECTIVE: In the last decades, phenidate analogs should be undertaken to re- several cognitive-enhancing drugs have been duce the uprising threat, and education efforts sold onto the drug market. Methylphenidate and should be made among high-risk populations. analogs represent a sub-class of these new psy- choactive substances (NPS). We aimed to re- Key Words: view the use and misuse of methylphenidate and Cognitive enhancers, Methylphenidate, Ritalin, Eth- analogs, and the risk associated. Moreover, we ylphenidate, Methylphenidate analogs, New psycho- exhaustively reviewed the scientific data on the active substances. most recent methylphenidate analogs (methyl- phenidate and ethylphenidate excluded). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Literature Introduction search was performed on methylphenidate and analogs, using specialized search engines ac- cessing scientific databases. Additional reports Consumption of various pharmaceutical drugs were retrieved from international agencies, in- by healthy individuals in an attempt to improve stitutional websites, and drug user forums. cognitive faculties is on the rise, whether for aca- RESULTS: Methylphenidate/Ritalin has been demic or recreational purposes1. These substances used for decades to treat attention deficit disor- are stimulants that preferentially target the cate- ders and narcolepsy. More recently, it has been used as a cognitive enhancer and a recreation- cholamines of the prefrontal cortex of the brain to al drug. Acute intoxications and fatalities involv- induce their effects (e.g., methylphenidate and an- ing methylphenidate were reported. Methylphe- alogs, modafinil and analogs, and amphetamine)2,3. nidate was scheduled as an illegal drug in ma- However, scientific studies supported only small ny countries, but NPS circumventing the ban benefits from cognition-enhancing drugs4 while the and mimicking the psychostimulant effects of risks to health are serious and include dependence, methylphenidate started being available: ethyl- phenidate, 3,4-dichloromethylphenidate, 3,4-di- tolerance, and cardiovascular, neurologic, and psy- chloroethylphenidate, 4-fluoromethylphenidate, chological disorders, with a risk of overdose leading 5 4-fluoroethylphenidate, methylnaphthidate, eth- to death . As a consequence, many of these sub- ylnaphthidate, isopropylphenidate, propylphe- stances are controlled internationally6. Like other nidate, 4-methylmethylphenidate, and N-benzy- new psychoactive substances (NPS), new molecules lethylphenidate have been available in the past mimicking the psychoactive effects of the scheduled few years. Only little data is currently available drugs are being synthesized to evade the legislation. for these substances. Many intoxications involv- ing methylphenidate analogs were reported. To Little information on the pharmacology and the date, ethylphenidate was involved in 28 fatali- toxicology of the new substances is known when ties, although it was reportedly directly related they first emerge. Methylphenidate (MPH) is one of to the cause of death in only 7 cases; 3,4-dichlo- the most popular cognitive enhancers4 and several roethylphenidate was involved in 1 death. analogs appeared on the drug market during the last CONCLUSIONS: The rapid expansion of meth- years. However, little or no scientific data on these ylphenidate analogs onto the drug market in the past few years makes likely the occurrence of in- new analogs is available. toxications and fatalities in the next years. Care- In this mini-review, we aimed to report the cur- ful monitoring and systematic control of methyl- rent trends in the use and misuse of cognitive en- Corresponding Authors: Francesco Paolo Busardò MD, MSc, DipFMS, Ph.D; e-mail: [email protected] 3 J. Carlier, R. Giorgetti, M.R. Varì, F. Pirani, G. Ricci, F.P. Busardò hancers within the sub-class of methylphenidate pairs previously established performance – and (MPH) and analogs. We performed an exhaustive reduced regional blood flow in different parts of review of the scientific data on MPH analogs that the brain3,11. MPH administration increases atten- first appeared on the drug market in the last five tion and cognition in healthy subjects through DA years, i.e. all MPH analogs with the exception of and NE increase in the striatum of the subcortical MPH and ethylphenidate. Finally, we compiled basal ganglia, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, the fatalities associated with the consumption of and the posterior parietal cortex of the brain3. MPH analogs reported in the literature. It was initially used for the treatment of depres- sion, chronic fatigue syndrome, and narcolepsy because of its stimulating and exciting effect, Materials and Methods tiredness and inhibitions elimination, physical efficiency increase for a short time12-15. The sale A literature search was performed on MED- of MPH is approved in some European countries, LINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL (Cochrane such as the United Kingdom and Germany, but Central Register of Controlled Trials) using the the number of prescriptions is significantly lower keywords methylphenidate intoxication, methyl- than the US and it is commonly prescribed under phenidate fatality, methylphenidate death, meth- the brand name Ritalin16, which is used in the ylphenidate analog, ethylphenidate, nopaine, di- treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disor- chloromethylphenidate, 3,4-CTMP, 3,4-DMPH, der (ADHD), with limited effectiveness17. dichloroethylphenidate, fluoromethylphenidate, MPH is also a substance under international 4F-TMP, fluoroethylphenidate, methylnaphthi- control, in accordance with the Convention date, HDMP-28, ethylnaphthidate, HDEP-28, on Psychotropic Substances of 19716. MPH isopropylphenidate, IPH, propylphenidate, PPH, is among the substances the most commonly methylmethylphenidate, and benzylethylpheni- misused by individuals seeking to extend their date, with the aim of identifying relevant articles capacities for alertness and cognition18,19. A published in English, up to December 2018. Fur- recent systematic review assessed MPH effect ther research manuscripts were retrieved through on cognitive performances in healthy subjects reference lists of selected articles. Additional including 46 trials and several meta-analyses of reports were found on international agencies or studies that tested the effects of MPH20. It was institutional websites including the European found that a single dose of MPH (5 to 40 mg monitoring centre for drugs and drug addiction or 0.25 to 0.5 mg/kg) had a significant effect (EMCDDA) and drug user forums. on memory but no effect on attention and ex- ecutive functions. When taken for a prolonged period, MPH presents a risk of addiction, and Results possibly physical dependence21. In sport, the substance is considered a doping substance and Methylphenidate is therefore prohibited. Within the last decade, Methylphenidate (MPH) (methyl phenyl Ritalin’s production almost increased tenfold (2-piperidinyl)acetate) is a sympathomimetic due to its misuse as brain doping substance and drug that was first synthesized in 1944 and estab- party drug. Indeed, the drug is one of the most lished as a psychostimulant in 1954. Its 2-benzyl misused cognitive enhancer, especially in US piperidine structure resembles that of catechol- college campuses, with a prevalence from 7 to amines and phenylethylamines, with a piperidine 25%22,23. Several studies investigated MPH mis- group substituting the amine (Figure 1). As such, use in college and University Students starting MPH’s structure is closely related to that of am- from the first years of new century24-26. In 2000, phetamines7. a study showed that more than 16% of 283 stu- Similarly to amphetamines, MPH competes dents of the Massachusetts College of Liberal with catecholamines in the central nervous system Arts had tried MPH recreationally24. A larger and blocks dopamine (DA) and norepinephrine study carried out at the University of Michigan (NE) transporters (DAT and NET, respectively), found that approximately 3% students (out of resulting in elevated synaptic extracellular DA 2250 students who completed the survey) had and NE levels8-10. MPH was shown to modulate declared past year illicit use of the drug. No cognition: e.g., improved planning and spatial significant differences between males and fe- working memory performance – although it im- males percentages of misuse/abuse were found. 4 Use of cognitive enhancers: methylphenidate and analogs Figure 1. Structural formula of methylphenidate and analogs. In addition, an association between MPH and reported Ritalin as their stimulant of choice. alcohol and drugs’ use was found25. A national More than 50% of the students using Ritalin US survey reported that 2.3% high school se- reported 2 or 3 administrations per year, 34% niors declared past-year use of Ritalin in 2003, reported 1 or 2 administrations per month, while 1.9% used methamphetamine27. The same and 15.5% reported 2 or 3 administrations per survey, carried out in 2006, showed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Methylphenidate Hydrochloride
    Application for Inclusion to the 22nd Expert Committee on the Selection and Use of Essential Medicines: METHYLPHENIDATE HYDROCHLORIDE December 7, 2018 Submitted by: Patricia Moscibrodzki, M.P.H., and Craig L. Katz, M.D. The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Graduate Program in Public Health New York NY, United States Contact: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 3 Summary Statement Page 4 Focal Point Person in WHO Page 5 Name of Organizations Consulted Page 6 International Nonproprietary Name Page 7 Formulations Proposed for Inclusion Page 8 International Availability Page 10 Listing Requested Page 11 Public Health Relevance Page 13 Treatment Details Page 19 Comparative Effectiveness Page 29 Comparative Safety Page 41 Comparative Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Page 45 Regulatory Status Page 48 Pharmacoepial Standards Page 49 Text for the WHO Model Formulary Page 52 References Page 61 Appendix – Letters of Support 2 1. Summary Statement of the Proposal for Inclusion of Methylphenidate Methylphenidate (MPH), a central nervous system (CNS) stimulant, of the phenethylamine class, is proposed for inclusion in the WHO Model List of Essential Medications (EML) & the Model List of Essential Medications for Children (EMLc) for treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) under ICD-11, 6C9Z mental, behavioral or neurodevelopmental disorder, disruptive behavior or dissocial disorders. To date, the list of essential medications does not include stimulants, which play a critical role in the treatment of psychotic disorders. Methylphenidate is proposed for inclusion on the complimentary list for both children and adults. This application provides a systematic review of the use, efficacy, safety, availability, and cost-effectiveness of methylphenidate compared with other stimulant (first-line) and non-stimulant (second-line) medications.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Methods for the Identification and Analysis of Synthetic Cathinones in Seized Materialsd
    Recommended methods for the Identification and Analysis of Synthetic Cathinones in Seized Materials (Revised and updated) MANUAL FOR USE BY NATIONAL DRUG ANALYSIS LABORATORIES Photo credits:UNODC Photo Library; UNODC/Ioulia Kondratovitch; Alessandro Scotti. Laboratory and Scientific Section UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Recommended Methods for the Identification and Analysis of Synthetic Cathinones in Seized Materials (Revised and updated) MANUAL FOR USE BY NATIONAL DRUG ANALYSIS LABORATORIES UNITED NATIONS Vienna, 2020 Note Operating and experimental conditions are reproduced from the original reference materials, including unpublished methods, validated and used in selected national laboratories as per the list of references. A number of alternative conditions and substitution of named commercial products may provide comparable results in many cases. However, any modification has to be validated before it is integrated into laboratory routines. ST/NAR/49/REV.1 Original language: English © United Nations, March 2020. All rights reserved, worldwide. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Mention of names of firms and commercial products does not imply the endorse- ment of the United Nations. This publication has not been formally edited. Publishing production: English, Publishing and Library Section, United Nations Office at Vienna. Acknowledgements The Laboratory and Scientific Section of the UNODC (LSS, headed by Dr. Justice Tettey) wishes to express its appreciation and thanks to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • How Pre-Clinical Studies Have Influenced Novel Psychoactive Substance Legislation in the UK and Europe
    Article How preclinical studies have influenced novel psychoactive substance legislation in the UK and Europe Santos, Raquel, Guirguis, Amira and Davidson, Colin Available at http://clok.uclan.ac.uk/31793/ Santos, Raquel ORCID: 0000-0003-3129-6732, Guirguis, Amira and Davidson, Colin ORCID: 0000-0002-8180-7943 (2020) How preclinical studies have influenced novel psychoactive substance legislation in the UK and Europe. British Journal Of Clinical Pharmacology, 86 (3). pp. 452-481. ISSN 0306-5251 It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.14224 For more information about UCLan’s research in this area go to http://www.uclan.ac.uk/researchgroups/ and search for <name of research Group>. For information about Research generally at UCLan please go to http://www.uclan.ac.uk/research/ All outputs in CLoK are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including Copyright law. Copyright, IPR and Moral Rights for the works on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the policies page. CLoK Central Lancashire online Knowledge www.clok.uclan.ac.uk How Pre-Clinical Studies Have Influenced Novel Psychoactive Substance Legislation in The UK and Europe Raquel Santos1, Amira Guirguis2 & Colin Davidson1* 1School of Pharmacy & Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Clinical & Biomedical Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, UK. 2Swansea University Medical School, Institute of Life Sciences 2, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UK. *Corresponding author Colin Davidson School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Science Faculty of Clinical & Biomedical Sciences University of Central Lancashire Preston PR1 2HE +44 (0)1772 89 3920 [email protected] Key words: novel psychoactive substance, legal high, legislation, toxicity, abuse Running Head: review of NPS pharmacology The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare Page | 1 Abstract Novel psychoactive substances (NPS) are new drugs of abuse.
    [Show full text]
  • FSI-D-16-00226R1 Title
    Elsevier Editorial System(tm) for Forensic Science International Manuscript Draft Manuscript Number: FSI-D-16-00226R1 Title: An overview of Emerging and New Psychoactive Substances in the United Kingdom Article Type: Review Article Keywords: New Psychoactive Substances Psychostimulants Lefetamine Hallucinogens LSD Derivatives Benzodiazepines Corresponding Author: Prof. Simon Gibbons, Corresponding Author's Institution: UCL School of Pharmacy First Author: Simon Gibbons Order of Authors: Simon Gibbons; Shruti Beharry Abstract: The purpose of this review is to identify emerging or new psychoactive substances (NPS) by undertaking an online survey of the UK NPS market and to gather any data from online drug fora and published literature. Drugs from four main classes of NPS were identified: psychostimulants, dissociative anaesthetics, hallucinogens (phenylalkylamine-based and lysergamide-based materials) and finally benzodiazepines. For inclusion in the review the 'user reviews' on drugs fora were selected based on whether or not the particular NPS of interest was used alone or in combination. NPS that were use alone were considered. Each of the classes contained drugs that are modelled on existing illegal materials and are now covered by the UK New Psychoactive Substances Bill in 2016. Suggested Reviewers: Title Page (with authors and addresses) An overview of Emerging and New Psychoactive Substances in the United Kingdom Shruti Beharry and Simon Gibbons1 Research Department of Pharmaceutical and Biological Chemistry UCL School of Pharmacy
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of the Inhibitory and Excitatory Effects of ADHD Medications Methylphenidate and Atomoxetine on Motor Cortex
    Neuropsychopharmacology (2006) 31, 442–449 & 2006 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0893-133X/06 $30.00 www.neuropsychopharmacology.org Comparison of the Inhibitory and Excitatory Effects of ADHD Medications Methylphenidate and Atomoxetine on Motor Cortex ,1 2 3 1 1 4 Donald L Gilbert* , Keith R Ridel , Floyd R Sallee , Jie Zhang , Tara D Lipps and Eric M Wassermann 1 2 Division of Neurology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA; University of Cincinnati 3 4 School of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA; Division of Psychiatry, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA; Brain Stimulation Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA Stimulant and norepinephrine (NE) reuptake inhibitor medications have different effects at the neuronal level, but both reduce symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). To understand their common physiologic effects and thereby gain insight into the neurobiology of ADHD treatment, we compared the effects of the stimulant methylphenidate (MPH) and NE uptake inhibitor atomoxetine (ATX) on inhibitory and excitatory processes in human cortex. Nine healthy, right-handed adults were given a single, oral dose of 30 mg MPH and 60 mg ATX at visits separated by 1 week in a randomized, double-blind crossover trial. We used paired and single transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of motor cortex to measure conditioned and unconditioned motor-evoked potential amplitudes at inhibitory (3 ms) and facilitatory (10 ms) interstimulus intervals (ISI) before and after drug administration. Data were analyzed with repeated measures, mixed model regression. We also analyzed our findings and the published literature with meta-analysis software to estimate treatment effects of stimulants and NE reuptake inhibitors on these TMS measures.
    [Show full text]
  • Seven Fatalities Associated with Ethylphenidate
    University of Huddersfield Repository Maskell, Peter D., Smith, Paul, Cole, Richard, Hikin, Laura and Morley, Stephen Seven fatalities associated with ethylphenidate Original Citation Maskell, Peter D., Smith, Paul, Cole, Richard, Hikin, Laura and Morley, Stephen (2016) Seven fatalities associated with ethylphenidate. Forensic Science International, 265. pp. 70-74. ISSN 03790738 This version is available at http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/27267/ The University Repository is a digital collection of the research output of the University, available on Open Access. Copyright and Moral Rights for the items on this site are retained by the individual author and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full items free of charge; copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided: • The authors, title and full bibliographic details is credited in any copy; • A hyperlink and/or URL is included for the original metadata page; and • The content is not changed in any way. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/ Seven fatalities associated with ethylphenidate a* b b b b P.D. Maskell P.R. Smith , R. Cole , L. Hikin , S.R. Morley , aDepartment of Chemical and Forensic Sciences, School of Applied Sciences. University of Huddersfield. Huddersfield. HD1 3DH bForensic Toxicology Unit, Department of Clinical Chemistry and Metabolic Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, LE1 5WW, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Methylphenidate Amplifies the Potency and Reinforcing Effects Of
    ARTICLE Received 1 Aug 2013 | Accepted 7 Oct 2013 | Published 5 Nov 2013 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3720 Methylphenidate amplifies the potency and reinforcing effects of amphetamines by increasing dopamine transporter expression Erin S. Calipari1, Mark J. Ferris1, Ali Salahpour2, Marc G. Caron3 & Sara R. Jones1 Methylphenidate (MPH) is commonly diverted for recreational use, but the neurobiological consequences of exposure to MPH at high, abused doses are not well defined. Here we show that MPH self-administration in rats increases dopamine transporter (DAT) levels and enhances the potency of MPH and amphetamine on dopamine responses and drug-seeking behaviours, without altering cocaine effects. Genetic overexpression of the DAT in mice mimics these effects, confirming that MPH self-administration-induced increases in DAT levels are sufficient to induce the changes. Further, this work outlines a basic mechanism by which increases in DAT levels, regardless of how they occur, are capable of increasing the rewarding and reinforcing effects of select psychostimulant drugs, and suggests that indivi- duals with elevated DAT levels, such as ADHD sufferers, may be more susceptible to the addictive effects of amphetamine-like drugs. 1 Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, USA. 2 Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S1A8. 3 Department of Cell Biology, Medicine and Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to S.R.J. (email: [email protected]). NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 4:2720 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3720 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 & 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited.
    [Show full text]
  • (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub
    US 20130289061A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/0289061 A1 Bhide et al. (43) Pub. Date: Oct. 31, 2013 (54) METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS TO Publication Classi?cation PREVENT ADDICTION (51) Int. Cl. (71) Applicant: The General Hospital Corporation, A61K 31/485 (2006-01) Boston’ MA (Us) A61K 31/4458 (2006.01) (52) U.S. Cl. (72) Inventors: Pradeep G. Bhide; Peabody, MA (US); CPC """"" " A61K31/485 (201301); ‘4161223011? Jmm‘“ Zhu’ Ansm’ MA. (Us); USPC ......... .. 514/282; 514/317; 514/654; 514/618; Thomas J. Spencer; Carhsle; MA (US); 514/279 Joseph Biederman; Brookline; MA (Us) (57) ABSTRACT Disclosed herein is a method of reducing or preventing the development of aversion to a CNS stimulant in a subject (21) App1_ NO_; 13/924,815 comprising; administering a therapeutic amount of the neu rological stimulant and administering an antagonist of the kappa opioid receptor; to thereby reduce or prevent the devel - . opment of aversion to the CNS stimulant in the subject. Also (22) Flled' Jun‘ 24’ 2013 disclosed is a method of reducing or preventing the develop ment of addiction to a CNS stimulant in a subj ect; comprising; _ _ administering the CNS stimulant and administering a mu Related U‘s‘ Apphcatlon Data opioid receptor antagonist to thereby reduce or prevent the (63) Continuation of application NO 13/389,959, ?led on development of addiction to the CNS stimulant in the subject. Apt 27’ 2012’ ?led as application NO_ PCT/US2010/ Also disclosed are pharmaceutical compositions comprising 045486 on Aug' 13 2010' a central nervous system stimulant and an opioid receptor ’ antagonist.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon-I I-D-Threo-Methylphenidate Binding to Dopamine Transporter in Baboon Brain
    Carbon-i i-d-threo-Methylphenidate Binding to Dopamine Transporter in Baboon Brain Yu-Shin Ding, Joanna S. Fowler, Nora D. Volkow, Jean Logan, S. John Gatley and Yuichi Sugano Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York; and Department of Psychiatry, SUNY Stony Brook@Stony Brook@NY children (1). MP is also used to treat narcolepsy (2). The The more active d-enantiomer of methyiphenidate (dI-threo psychostimulant properties of MP have been linked to its methyl-2-phenyl-2-(2-piperidyl)acetate, Ritalin)was labeled with binding to a site on the dopamine transporter, resulting in lic (t1,@:20.4 mm) to characterize its binding, examine its spec inhibition of dopamine reuptake and enhanced levels of ificftyfor the dopamine transporter and evaluate it as a radio synaptic dopamine. tracer forthe presynapticdopaminergicneuron. Methods PET We have developed a rapid synthesis of [11C]dl-threo studies were canied out inthe baboon. The pharmacokinetics of methylphenidate ([“C]MP)to examine its pharmacokinet r1c]d-th@O-msth@ha@idate @f'1C]d-thmo-MP)weremeasured ics and pharmacological profile in vivo and to evaluate its and compared with r1cY-th@o-MP and with fts racemate ff@1C]fl-thmo-meth@1phenidate,r1c]MP). Nonradioact,ve meth suitability as a radiotracer for the presynaptic dopaminergic ylphenidate was used to assess the reveralbilityand saturability neuron (3,4). These first PET studies of MP in the baboon of the binding. GBR 12909, 3@3-(4-iodophenyI)tropane-2-car and human brain demonstrated the saturable [1‘C]MP boxylic acid methyl ester (fi-Cfl), tomoxetine and citalopram binding to the dopamine transporter in the baboon brain were used to assess the binding specificity.
    [Show full text]
  • Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs
    ACMD Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs Chair: Dr Owen Bowden-Jones Secretary: Zahi Sulaiman 1st Floor (NE), Peel Building 2 Marsham Street London SW1P 4DF Tel: 020 7035 1121 [email protected] Sarah Newton MP Minister for Vulnerability, Safeguarding and Countering Extremism Home Office 2 Marsham Street London SW1P 4DF 10 March 2017 Dear Minister, RE: Further advice on methylphenidate-related NPS In February 2016, my predecessor Professor Les Iversen wrote to the then minister for Preventing Abuse, Exploitation and Crime, requesting that the Temporary Class Drug Order (TCDO) on seven methylphenidate-related Novel Psychoactive Substances be re-laid for a further 12 months. This TCDO was re-laid until June 2017, to allow the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD) more time to collect the evidence required to provide further advice for full control under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971. The ACMD believes that the TCDO has been effective in reducing the prevalence of these substances and that the TCDO level of control was proportionate in the interim. I am now pleased to present to you the ACMD’s further advice on this matter in the enclosed report. The ACMD’s recommendation for full control applies to the seven substances currently controlled under the TCDO and extends to an additional five closely-related substances. These five similar substances have subsequently appeared on markets following the TCDO and are included in this advice due to their potential for similar harms. Recommendation The ACMD recommends that the
    [Show full text]
  • CAS Number Index
    2334 CAS Number Index CAS # Page Name CAS # Page Name CAS # Page Name 50-00-0 905 Formaldehyde 56-81-5 967 Glycerol 61-90-5 1135 Leucine 50-02-2 596 Dexamethasone 56-85-9 963 Glutamine 62-44-2 1640 Phenacetin 50-06-6 1654 Phenobarbital 57-00-1 514 Creatine 62-46-4 1166 α-Lipoic acid 50-11-3 1288 Metharbital 57-22-7 2229 Vincristine 62-53-3 131 Aniline 50-12-4 1245 Mephenytoin 57-24-9 1950 Strychnine 62-73-7 626 Dichlorvos 50-23-7 1017 Hydrocortisone 57-27-2 1428 Morphine 63-05-8 127 Androstenedione 50-24-8 1739 Prednisolone 57-41-0 1672 Phenytoin 63-25-2 335 Carbaryl 50-29-3 569 DDT 57-42-1 1239 Meperidine 63-75-2 142 Arecoline 50-33-9 1666 Phenylbutazone 57-43-2 108 Amobarbital 64-04-0 1648 Phenethylamine 50-34-0 1770 Propantheline bromide 57-44-3 191 Barbital 64-13-1 1308 p-Methoxyamphetamine 50-35-1 2054 Thalidomide 57-47-6 1683 Physostigmine 64-17-5 784 Ethanol 50-36-2 497 Cocaine 57-53-4 1249 Meprobamate 64-18-6 909 Formic acid 50-37-3 1197 Lysergic acid diethylamide 57-55-6 1782 Propylene glycol 64-77-7 2104 Tolbutamide 50-44-2 1253 6-Mercaptopurine 57-66-9 1751 Probenecid 64-86-8 506 Colchicine 50-47-5 589 Desipramine 57-74-9 398 Chlordane 65-23-6 1802 Pyridoxine 50-48-6 103 Amitriptyline 57-92-1 1947 Streptomycin 65-29-2 931 Gallamine 50-49-7 1053 Imipramine 57-94-3 2179 Tubocurarine chloride 65-45-2 1888 Salicylamide 50-52-2 2071 Thioridazine 57-96-5 1966 Sulfinpyrazone 65-49-6 98 p-Aminosalicylic acid 50-53-3 426 Chlorpromazine 58-00-4 138 Apomorphine 66-76-2 632 Dicumarol 50-55-5 1841 Reserpine 58-05-9 1136 Leucovorin 66-79-5
    [Show full text]
  • Download Product Insert
    PRODUCT INFORMATION Cathinone Analytical Standards Panel Item No. 31616 Storage: -20°C Stability: ≥2 years Laboratory Procedures Uncap each vial to be used. Add 500 µl of methanol to each vial. This will provide a 200 µg/ml standard solution for each analyte. Re-cap the vials and place plate on a plate mixer or vortexer. Mix for a minimum of 15 minutes to ensure full reconstitution. The plate included in this panel contains a residual amount of glycerol to aid in the reconstitution of the analyte in methanol. Recovery in methanol has been validated for all analytes on the plate. Recovery from other solvents has not been verified. Description The Cathinone Analytical Standards Panel contains 239 analytical reference materials and standards categorized as cathinones and cathinone metabolites. These compounds are supplied at 100 μg/well in a 96-well plate format for rapid screening or cataloging. The plate included in this panel contains a residual amount of glycerol to aid in the reconstitution of the analyte in methanol. Recovery in methanol has been validated for all analytes on the plate. Recovery from other solvents has not been verified. Please review the product insert for a full list of targets. The Cathinone Analytical Standards Panel contains compounds regulated as Schedule I compounds in the United States and is regulated as a Schedule I item. This product is intended for research and forensic applications. Panel Contents Plate Well Contents Item Number Molecular Formula CAS Number 1 A1 Unused 1 A2 (−)-(S)-Cathinone (hydrochloride)
    [Show full text]