Plato on Political Stability: Some Lessons for Nigeria

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Plato on Political Stability: Some Lessons for Nigeria Sabaragamuwa University Journal Volume 17 Number 1 February 2019 pp 38-48 ISSN 1391-3166; eISSN 2386-2041 http://dx.doi.org/10.4038/suslj.v17i1.7730 ©2019 Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka Plato on Political Stability: Some Lessons for Nigeria M.O. Olatunji Faculty of Education, Ajayi Crowther University, Oyo, Nigeria [email protected] Abstract The Greek world during the time of Plato was characterized by political challenges and pronounced social injustices. There were turmoil and party conflicts. Plato saw Greece of his time as a place that was very difficult to govern properly because of opposition from those who were bent on putting their own interest above that of the state. Plato saw most of the politicians of his time as selfish. There was violence and party struggles and the eventual defeat of Athens by Sparta and other members of the Peloponnesian Confederacy in 404 BC; a defeat which Plato attributed to maladministration by the rulers. In order to change the undesirable trend of event for better, Plato came up with a series of ideas. The scenario that characterized the Greek world in which Plato lived is to a very large extent similar to the happenings in twenty first century Nigeria. This paper therefore examines the theory postulated by Plato as the panacea to the crisis in Greece of his time and draw out areas that are relevant as solutions to the socio-political challenges facing Nigeria in the twenty first century. The paper adopts a blend of Critical Theory, Historiography and Philosophical analysis as its research methodology and concludes among other things with a clarion call to address headlong the obvious leadership challenges that have been the cog in the wheel of the Nigeria's progress for years. Key words: Plato, Stability, Nigeria, Athens, Morality, Greek Introduction opportunity to settle old scores. There was anxi- ety, party bitterness and uncertainty. Morality was No one has ever equaled Plato in the voy- at very low ebb, essential traditional values were ages of intellectual discovery and adventure overlooked, the rule of law was greatly abused, and [Brumbaugh, 1974]. Plato was born in 427 B.C., there were injustices. Plato saw the Athens as a the son of Ariston and Perictione, both of whom place that was extremely difficult to govern prop- were descended from distinguished Athenians of erly and that the defeat that was suffered in the royalty and were well to do. His father died when Peloponnesian war was as a result of mal admin- Plato was a few years old. The Greek custom like istration and mutual distrust among the leaders. what operates in most part of the contemporary When the masses could no longer bear rule of the world allowed his mother Pericitone to re-marry. Thirty, there was an uprising that eventually led Plato's step father, Pyrilampes, was a prominent to the Thirty been driven out of government and Athenian. He had been a close friend and supporter all of them killed. This incident was followed by a of Pericles [Jane, 1994]. Socrates frequented Pyril- very short period of relative sanity in Athens dur- ampes' home for discussion. As a result of this, ing which Plato contemplated the idea of taking Plato over time developed interest in Socrates and very active part in the politics of Athens. How- his philosophical ideas. Plato grew up in a period ever, in 399 B.C., Socrates, whom Plato greatly of political crisis. The Peloponnesian war began be- admired and seen as \the most upright man then fore he was born and lasted until he was 23 years living", was condemned and executed by politicians old. The war involved Athens on the one hand on a charge of impiety and corrupting the youth, and Sparta together with the other members of the Plato became more convinced that Athenian soci- Peloponnesian Confederacy on the other. The war ety was politically too corrupt, ignorant of the na- ended on a bad note for Athens in 404 B.C. With ture of man, and particularly wrong in condemning the fall of Athens, a commission of thirty men was Socrates. For these reasons, he abandoned his in- set up to produce a new constitution. In the in- terest in politics and took to philosophy and the terim, the Thirty governed Athens. They however search for solution to Athenian leadership chal- ruled with iron hands and this degenerated into in- lenge. Some scholars maintain that Plato served ternal conflict as the Thirty used their new found as the \defense attorney" for Socrates during his 38 Sabaragamuwa University Journal 2019, V.17 NO.1 pp 38-48 trial. That he lost the case, coupled with the fact with each other [Sabine, 1973]. Plato was grieved that his beloved mentor had a profound effect on by the situation in Greece as he saw that public him made Plato anxious to preserve the memory of action can only be carried out successfully only Socrates [Hare, 1999]. Following the way Socrates with the availability and support of trustworthy was brutally exterminated, Plato dedicated his life supporters. Such was the society in which Plato to the vindication of Socrates' memory and teach- lived. He was therefore convinced that mankind ings and also the presentation of his own theory on would have no respite from trouble until something how society can be properly governed. He wrote 34 drastic was done to halt and redirect the danger- dialogues, with The Republic in the middle. It is of ous trend of events then. He believed that hope general consensus that the first dialogues written could come about only when real philosophers suc- by Plato were the immortalization of his mentor's ceeded in gaining political powers or until, through thought, and also a distinctive Socratic Philoso- divine intervention, those who rule and have po- phy. Beginning with the Republic and the following litical authority become real philosophers. These later dialogues a Platonic philosophy and philoso- should be persons who love wisdom and truth, who phy of education was outlined. must study and distinguish themselves in their un- According to Korab- Karpowicz (2016), Plato derstanding of the basic nature of true existence. developed such distinct areas of philosophy as epis- To some extent, many of the conditions that Plato st temology, metaphysics, ethics and aesthetics. He lamented about in his days are prevailing in 21 alludes further that the deep influence of Plato century Nigeria. This reality motivated the thought on Western philosophy is asserted in the famous that some of Plato's recommendations may give in- remark of Alfred North Whitehead: \the safest sight on how to solve some of the major challenges characterization of the Western philosophical tra- facing Nigeria today. dition is that it consists of a series of footnotes to Methods and Conceptual Clarifi- Plato".Korab-Karpowicz, (2016) also observes that Plato was an ideal political philosopher whose ideas cations had a profound impact on subsequent political the- Political Stability is a major concept in this pa- ories. His greatest impact was Aristotle but he in- per. Attempt is therefore made to examine it and fluenced Western political thought in many ways. come up with the context within which it will be The Academy, the school that Plato founded be- used in the discussion. came the model for other schools of higher learning Political Stability is a relatively permanent and later for European universities. It is the view social arrangement within which both the af- of Plato that the interest of different parts of so- fairs of the state and the conduct of all aspects ciety can be harmonized. Korab-Karpowicz (2016) of social life, spiritual, cultural and economical, argues that the best, rational and righteous, polit- can go on without fear of disruption or threat ical order which Plato proposes leads to a harmo- either from within or from outside aggressors nious unity of society and allows each of its parts [Bamisaiye, 1998]. Political stability therefore be- to flourish, but not at the expense of others. Plato comes both an aspiration and a value in the modern however points out that the theoretical design and state. It is an aspiration without which a state can- practical implementation of the order he proposes not exist. Bamisaiye, (1998) explains further that are impossible without virtue. political stability is a value necessary for the attain- Plato criticized the politicians of his days for be- ment of the good life for the people living within ing ignorant and incompetent. He criticized them her borders. She gives some factors that make for for their violence, selfishness that was manifested in political stability. These are: party struggles with the different factions placing their own interest above the interest of the state. Social Order and Control Plato saw the disparity of economic interests be- Social Order is the absence of chaos while social tween those who had property and those who had control is the prevalence of established agen- none as the main reason factionalism and party cies responsible for the smooth working of the selfishness. Even in the smallest city, Plato saw that machinery of state. Order is a state of affairs there were, in fact, two distinct cities - \a city of brought about by effective control of the appa- the rich and a city of the poor, externally at war ratus of state over social life. Where there is 39 ©2019 Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka Sabaragamuwa University Journal 2019, V.17 NO.1 pp 38-48 lack of or ineffective control, disorder sets in. training that he or she has the capacity for, he did On the contrary, a situation of relative perma- not support the idea of providing the education nent means of social control leads to a perma- that an individual will not be able to cope with nent state of order or predictable functioning nor profit by.
Recommended publications
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Democratic Education in The
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Democratic Education in the Works of Plato A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science by Richard A. Barrett Committee in charge: Professor Tracy B. Strong, Chair Professor Page duBois Professor Fonna Forman Professor Marcel Hénaff Professor Gerry Mackie 2014 Copyright Richard A. Barrett, 2014 All rights reserved. The Dissertation of Richard A. Barrett is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: ______________________________________________ ______________________________________________ ______________________________________________ Chair UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO 2014 iii DEDICATION To those who have shared conversations about our world with me. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page……………………………………………………………………...…iii Dedication……………………………………………………………………………..iv Table of Contents……………………………………………………………………....v Vita…………………………………………………………………………………....vii Abstract of the Dissertation.………………………………………………………....viii Introduction: Plato and the Problem of Democratic Education ..................................... 1 Chapter 1 Reading Plato: Plato and Xenophon as Teachers and Poets ............. 7 1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 7 1.2 Comparison of Apologies ................................................................................ 8 1.3 Plato on the Relationship of Philosophy,
    [Show full text]
  • MINEOLA BIBLE INSTITUTE and SEMINARY Philosophy II Radically
    MINEOLA BIBLE INSTITUTE AND SEMINARY Page | 1 Philosophy II Radically, Biblical, Apostolic, Christianity Bishop D.R. Vestal, PhD Larry L Yates, ThD, DMin “Excellence in Apostolic Education since 1991” 1 Copyright © 2019 Mineola Bible Institute Page | 2 All Rights Reserved This lesson material may not be used in any manner for reproduction in any language or use without the written permission of Mineola Bible Institute. 2 Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 7 Alexander the Great (356-323 B.C.) ........................................................................................... 8 Philip II of Macedonia (382-336 B.C.) ....................................................................................... 12 Page | 3 “Olympias the mother of Alexander was an evil woman. .......................................... 13 Philip II (of Macedonia) (382-336 BC) .............................................................................. 13 Aristotle (384-322 BC) ............................................................................................................... 15 Works .................................................................................................................................... 16 Methods ............................................................................................................................... 17 Doctrines ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Plato's Defence of the Forms in the Parmenides
    1 Plato’s defence of the Forms in the Parmenides In Plato’s Parmenides we find objections against the Forms which Aristotle in the Metaphysics presents as arguments that refute the theory of Forms. Plato does not refute those objections. This led many philosophers to suppose that the Parmenides initiated a new, critical phase in Plato’s thought, in which he radically revised the theory of Forms presented in the Republic.i I shall argue that Plato in the Parmenides defends the Forms by pointing to his presentation of them in the Republic. Parmenides reflects on his criticism of the Forms in the Parmenides as follows: ‘And yet, these difficulties and many more still in addition necessarily hold of the characters (anankaion echein ta eidȇ), if these characteristics of things that are exist (ei eisin hautai hai ideai tȏn ontȏn), and one is to distinguish each character as something by itself (kai horieitai tis auto hekaston eidos). The result is that the hearer is perplexed and contends that they do not exist, and that even if their existence is conceded, they are necessarily unknowable by human nature. In saying this, he thinks he is saying something significant (kai tauta legonta dokein ti legein) and, as we just remarked (kai, ho arti elegomen), it’s astonishingly hard to convince him to the contrary. Only a man of considerable natural gifts will be able to understand that there is a certain kind of each thing, a nature and reality alone by itself, and it will take a man more remarkable still to discover it and be able to instruct someone else who has examined all these difficulties with sufficient care.’ (134e-135b, tr.
    [Show full text]
  • Socrates and Plato
    M01_JOHN0380_04_SE_C01.qxd 1/7/11 5:05 PM Page 17 1 Socrates and Plato Time Line for Socrates 470 BC Is born in Athens, Greece, the son of Sophroniscus, a stonemason, and Phaenarete, a midwife. 470–400 Grows up during the “golden age” of Greece—his father, an intimate friend of the son of Aristides the Just, provides Socrates an acquaintanceship with the members of the Pericles circle. Serves with valor in the Peloponnesian War. Marries Xanthippe. They have seven or eight children. Is declared the wisest man by the Oracle at Delphi. Is put on trial for corrupting the minds of the youth of Athens. 399 Is found guilty and forced to drink hemlock. Socrates wrote nothing. All that we know of him is from the writings of Aristophenes (The Clouds), Plato, and Xenophon. Time Line for Plato 427 BC Is born in Athens, Greece, to a prominent family. Following his father’s death, his mother marries Pyrilampes, a close friend of Pericles. 405–400 Studies with Socrates. 399 Attends the trial and execution of Socrates. 387 Establishes the Academy. Later, Eudoxius, respected mathematician, unites his school, located at Cyzicus, with the Academy. 367 Accepts Aristotle into the Academy. 347 Dies in Athens. Although scholars continue to debate the time frame of Plato’s writings, the following are generally attributed to each period: Early Period Works, usually referred to as Socratic dialogues, focus on ethics. Included in this period are Apology, Crito, Charmides, Laches, Euthyphro, Euthydemus, Cratylus, Protagoras, and Gorgias. 17 M01_JOHN0380_04_SE_C01.qxd 1/7/11 5:05 PM Page 18 18 Chapter 1 • Socrates and Plato Middle Period Works focus on theory of ideas and metaphysical doctrines.
    [Show full text]
  • Brainy Quote ~ Plato 002
    Brainy Quote ~ Plato 002 “Courage is knowing what not to fear.” ~ Plato 002 "Keberanian adalah mengetahui apa yang tidak perlu ditakuti." ~ Plato 002 Anda pernah memiliki rasa takut terhadap sesuatu? Takut datang ke sekolah pertama sekali, takut bertemua orang baru, atau takut meninggalkan kampung halaman? Takut menghadapi wawancana kerja atau takut berbicara di depan orang banyak? Pada akhirnya, Anda berani menghadapinya. Mengapa? Apa yang membuat keberanian Anda tumbuh? Apakah Anda berani karena kemampuan Anda bertambah atau karena Anda menyadari tidak ada yang perlu ditakuti? Sesungguhnya, rasa takut selalu ada. Namun, ketika kita mengetahui bahwa tidak perlu ada rasa takut, maka pada saat itu, keberanian kita muncul. Demikianlah apa yang pernah diutarakan Plato, seorang penulis dan filsuf berkebangsaan Yunani, hidup dalam rentang tahun 428-348 BC, lewat quote-nya, ‘Courage is knowing what not to fear.’ Secara bebas diterjemahkan, ‘Keberanian adalah mengetahui apa yang tidak perlu ditakuti.’ Kita memiliki keberanian akan sesuatu karena kita memiliki pengetahuan terhadap apa yang kita hadapi. Ketika kita memilik cukup ‘senjata’ saat menghadapi sesuatu yang baru atau sesuatu yang asing pada mulanya, kita tidak akan merasa khawatir terhadap apapun yang akan terjadi. Bila kita memiliki persiapan yang cukup, pengalaman yang mumpuni, atau wawasan yang relevan terhadap apa yang akan kita hadapi, keberanian kita otomatis akan muncul. Milikilah keberanian! Walaupun rasa takut selalu ada. Rasa takut tetap diperlukan agar kita mawas diri dan waspada senantiasa, andai sesuatu terjadi diluar bayangan kita. Dengan persiapan yang cukup serta pengetahuan yang layak, kita akan mampu mengatasi rasa takut yang menghantui. Kita tidak sendiri. Sesungguhnya, setiap orang memiliki ketakutan yang sama dengan kadar yang berbeda.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Daimonion of Socrates
    SAPERE Scripta Antiquitatis Posterioris ad Ethicam REligionemque pertinentia Schriften der späteren Antike zu ethischen und religiösen Fragen Herausgegeben von Heinz-Günther Nesselrath, Reinhard Feldmeier und Rainer Hirsch-Luipold Band XVI Plutarch On the daimonion of Socrates Human liberation, divine guidance and philosophy edited by Heinz-Günther Nesselrath Introduction, Text, Translation and Interpretative Essays by Donald Russell, George Cawkwell, Werner Deuse, John Dillon, Heinz-Günther Nesselrath, Robert Parker, Christopher Pelling, Stephan Schröder Mohr Siebeck e-ISBN PDF 978-3-16-156444-4 ISBN 978-3-16-150138-8 (cloth) ISBN 987-3-16-150137-1 (paperback) The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Natio- nal bibliographie; detailed bibliographic data is availableon the Internet at http:// dnb.d-nb.de. © 2010 by Mohr Siebeck Tübingen. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that permitted by copyright law) without the publisher’s written permission. This applies particularly to reproductions, translations, microfilms and storage and processing in electronic systems. This book was typeset by Christoph Alexander Martsch, Serena Pirrotta and Thorsten Stolper at the SAPERE Research Institute, Göttingen, printed by Gulde- Druck in Tübingen on non-aging paper and bound by Buchbinderei Spinner in Ottersweier. Printed in Germany. SAPERE Greek and Latin texts of Later Antiquity (1st–4th centuries AD) have for a long time been overshadowed by those dating back to so-called ‘classi- cal’ times. The first four centuries of our era have, however, produced a cornucopia of works in Greek and Latin dealing with questions of philoso- phy, ethics, and religion that continue to be relevant even today.
    [Show full text]
  • Plato, Parmenides1
    1 Primary Source 1.3 PLATO, PARMENIDES1 Plato (429–348 B.C.) was an ancient Greek philosopher, mathematician, writer of philosophical dialogues, and student of Socrates (469–399 B.C.). He also founded the Academy in Athens, the first institution of higher learning in the Western world. Along with Socrates and his student, Aristotle, Plato helped to lay the foundations of Western philosophy and science. Plato believed that every class of existing things corresponds to a transcendent and permanently existing idea of that class of things and that each transcendent idea (or form) is more real than the things themselves and indeed makes their existence possible. Thus, the idea of a “man” must have a real, transcendent existence, and each individual human being must correspond to this idea or form. Plato’s theory of forms was perhaps his most notable contribution to philosophy. In the dialogue excerpted below, Plato imagines a conversation between a youthful Socrates and two pre-Socratic philosophers, Zeno (490–430 B.C.) and Parmenides (fl. early 5th century B.C.). The pre-Socratic philosophers, of whose writings only fragments still remain, investigated and theorized about the nature of reality, the complexities of human thought, and the natural world. Zeno was famous for discovering contradictions, absurdities, and paradoxes even in assertions by philosophers. Parmenides believed that everything is interconnected and forms a single unchanging unity. Opposed to his thinking, but not mentioned in the dialogue, was Heraclitus (c. 535–c. 475 B.C.), who claimed that everything constantly changes, such that no one can ever step in the same river twice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Afterlife Myths in Plato's Moral Arguments
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Philosophy Theses Department of Philosophy 5-18-2009 The Role of Afterlife Myths in Plato's Moral Arguments Daniel William Issler Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/philosophy_theses Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Issler, Daniel William, "The Role of Afterlife Myths in Plato's Moral Arguments." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2009. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/philosophy_theses/56 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Philosophy at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ROLE OF AFTERLIFE MYTHS IN PLATO’S MORAL ARGUMENTS by DANIEL ISSLER Under the Direction of Tim O’Keefe ABSTRACT I will address the issue of Plato’s use of myths concerning the afterlife in the context of the ethical arguments of the Gorgias , Phaedo and Republic , and I will contend that while the arguments in each dialogue are aimed at convincing the rational part of the self, the myths are aimed at persuading the non-rational part of the self. In support of this interpretation, I will examine Plato’s views on the relation between the different parts of the soul and the relationship that poetry and myth have to philosophy. I will argue that Plato’s use of myth is a legitimate tactic in his project of moral education, given his views concerning the role that the non-rational parts of the self play in one’s moral life.
    [Show full text]
  • Listening Carefully: Plato Tells About the Sophists*
    Rustam Galanin Listening Carefully: Plato Tells About the Sophists* Rustam Galanin Listening Carefully: Plato Tells About the Sophists Abstract. It is well known that most of our knowledge of the Sophists is obtained from Plato’s dialogues as well as the long tradition of criticism aimed at sophistry. Thanks to the œuvre of Plato and Aristotle and their followers, we envisage the Sophists as bad guys, obnoxious “many-sided creatures” who take fees for their teachings and are “not to be caught with one hand”. Fortunately we know not only how bad the Sophists were, but also what they taught, and it is Plato who in many cases is our only source of information on the topic. That is why I am not going to criticize Plato for having an inadequate view of the Sophists — which is a common notion — but, on the contrary, will try to offer an apology in behalf of Plato by way of demostrating how much we owe him in terms of our knowledge about the Sophists. Further, I am planning to make a summary of modern assessments of Plato as a source for sophistology, and to show that Plato’s dialogues are unique historical testimonies, and therefore many things written by him about the Sophists are to be taken on trust. Keywords: ancient philosophy, sophistry, rhetoric. The dialogues never lie Everyone would remember the famous words of the Eleatic Stranger to Theaetetus regarding a Sophist, “that this creature is many-sided and, as the saying is, not to be caught with one hand.”¹ The irony of Socrates ridiculing the false importance in which wallow the Sophists and their © Р.Б.
    [Show full text]
  • PLATO (The Philosopher): USER's GUIDE
    PLATO (the philosopher): USER’S GUIDE (version of December 6, 2016, emended April 6, 2020) “Unless either the philosophers become kings in the cities or those who are nowadays called kings and rulers get to philosophizing truly and adequately, and this falls together upon the same person, political power and philosophy, while the many natures of those who are driven toward the one apart from the other are forcibly set aside, there will be no cessation of evils, my dear Glaucon, for cities, nor, methinks, for the human race.” Plato, République, V, 473c11-d61 “I realised that it is not only the material world that is different from the aspect in which we see it; that all reality is perhaps equally dissimilar from what we think ourselves to be directly perceiving and that we compose by means of ideas which don’t show up but are active, in the same way the trees, the sun and the sky would not be such as we see them if they were appre- hended by beings having eyes differently constituted from ours, or else en- dowed for this task with organs other than eyes which would provide equiva- lents of trees and sky and sun, though not visual.” M. Proust, The Guermantes Way, translation C. K. Scott Moncrieff revised by me (Note: a table of contents based on bookmarks is available for display on the left part of the screen in Adobe Reader) Foreword: this paper is a translation by me into English of a paper I originally wrote in French, my native tongue, under the title “Platon: mode d’emploi” (version of December 6, 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Godless Human Philosophy: Truth According to Man
    Chapter One Godless Human Philosophy: Truth According to Man “The desire of power in excess caused the angels to fall; the desire of knowledge in excess caused man to fall.” Francis Bacon, Advancement of Learning, 1605 Man’s Futile Search for Wisdom and Truth The origin of the word “philosophy” comes from the combination of the Greek words philos, which means love, and sophia, which means wisdom. The meaning of the word philosophy, therefore, is a “love of wisdom.” As sentient creatures made in the image and likeness of God, human beings have an inborn urge to know and understand the truth. No other creatures have this desire for wisdom and knowledge. That’s what separates us from the brutes. Merely surviving from day to day like the animals do is not enough for mankind, for we cannot live in peace with ourselves if we don’t ponder where we come from and where we’re going when we die. God recognizes this inborn desire we have, for he was the one who gave it to us in the first place, and has revealed himself to us in order that we may know the truth, and love him and seek him out, and ultimately be reunited to him when we die. As we have discovered from the modern sciences of archaeology, anthropology, and paleontology, the whole of human history has been a never-ending search for the truth about our creator. Primitive savages once believed that the heavenly bodies and the natural forces and elements of the earth were gods and therefore worshipped such things as the moon, the sun, the planets, earth, wind, fire, rain, crops, animals, insects, and many other things that exist in the natural realm.
    [Show full text]
  • Plato's Gorgias
    a fi : 'I 1 tJly' Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from University of Toronto http://www.archive.org/details/platosgorgiasOOplat PLATO'S GOEGIAS. Cambritjge: PRINTED BY C. J. CLAY, 3I.A. AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS. : PLATO'S GORGIAS, LITERALLY TRANSLATED, WITH AN INTRODUCTORY ESSAY, CONTAINING A SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT. BY E. M. COPE, FELLOW OF TRINITY COLLEGE. CAMBRIDGE DEIGHTON, BELL, AND CO. LONDON: BELL AND DALDY, 1864. THE INSTITI'Tr ri!" ftfrr!»n/£| STUDIES JO - . Jot ^ WAH 3 1 1932 PREFACE. The object aimed at in this Translation is, as the title-page sets forth, to render Plato's text as nearly as possible word for word into English, and it is therefore not intended specially for English readers. On the contrary, it is intended principally for stu- dents and scholars, for those who are learning or have learnt to compare the structure and resources of the Greek and the English language, and the several modes of expression which the habits of thought pre- vailing in times and places so far removed from one another have stamped upon their respective idioms. Those who have done so are the only fair judges of such an attempt, and will be the first to make the requisite allowance for the defects and shortcomings which will most assuredly be found in this transla- tion. My endeavour has been not only to convey the spirit and freedom, which of course must be the aim of every translator, but also as far as possible to preserve the form of the original language; and I have done my best to hold a middle course between the pedantic and servile adherence to the letter by vi rUEFACE.
    [Show full text]