Strathchat Issue 2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Strathchat Issue 2 STRATHchat ISSUE NO. 2 : JUNE 2016 NHS Highland’s major service change project in Badenoch & Strathspey Latest plans In this issue... for redesign Latest updates New service model proposals announced Academic study IN February 2015, Shona Robison, cated to the new facility but the other the Cabinet Secretary for Health and health centres will remain at their exist- planned Wellbeing, approved NHS Highland’s ing locations. proposals for the modernisation of The redesign will also mean the services in Badenoch and Strath- eventual closure of the Ian Charles Community spey. Hospital in Grantown-on-Spey and the Empowerment The redesign will include the devel- St Vincent’s Hospital in Kingussie once opment of community and adult social the new arrangements are in place. Act considera- care services as well as the construc- Further updates on all aspects of tions tion of a new community hospital and the work to redesign health and social resource centre in Aviemore. care services are set out in this news- Aviemore Health Centre will be relo- letter. Update on project team Transport and New model of service access THE details of the proposed new Community hospital and resource cen- model of service and workforce plan tre in Aviemore for Badenoch and Strathspey are An external academic and inde- Key dates being finalised. pendent review of demographic projec- They will be considered by the pro- tions and how they relate to health ject board in July. needs is now under way. How to find out The following specific areas are cur- This builds on internal projections more rently under consideration: and will provide greater information on (Continued on next page) Produced by NHS Highland STRATHchat New model of service proposals (Continued from front page ) future requirements for both in- hospital and community services in the Badenoch and Strathspey area. The accommodation schedule is also being completed for the new hospital and work is ongoing on options for hotel services in- cluding catering. Actions have been ongoing for some time to procure a site in Aviemore for the proposed new facility. Health centres Both the Grantown and Kingus- sie health centres will need to be upgraded. The next steps are be- ing developed as part of the over- all redesign. In Grantown, the plans include An artist’s impression of the new Aviemore facility improving the entrance to the health centre. velop a care academy which will Patients will get a special as- This will require Scottish Gov- support staff recruitment and train- sessment and initial treatment but ernment funding and bids are cur- ing. will generally be supported to return rently being prepared. to their local community quickly. Older adult mental health services: in-patient care Care homes Community mental health services The seven older adult specialist Work is already under way on There will also be investment in mental health beds currently pro- changes to both NHS Highland community mental health and com- vided at St Vincent’s Hospital in managed care homes in the area: munity care services in the local Kingussie will transfer to the acute Grant House in Grantown-on Spey area. mental health specialist unit at New and the Wade Centre in Kingus- This is to ensure that there is Craigs Psychiatric Hospital in Inver- sie. This is to allow them to pro- extra capacity to manage patients ness. vide more flexible use including with increased complexity and This is planned to occur in ad- emergency respite, palliative and avoid admission to hospital where vance of the new hospital being end-of-life care. possible. It will also generally help opened in Aviemore. to improve access to mental health The beds in St Vincent’s are not Care at home services. exclusively for the use of people Significant steps to transform living in Badenoch and Strathspey. the delivery of care at home ser- Audits have shown that around Providing choice for end-of-life care vices is happening across all parts half of the patients in these beds do A local multi-agency group has of Highland including in Badenoch not live locally and overall the trans- been set up to look at enhancing and Strathspey. This will see more fer to Inverness will improve access end-of-life care to improve choice care at home being commissioned for more people. for patients about where they wish through independent providers In addition, under the current to die. and support greater independence arrangements visiting consultant through an approach called en- psychiatrists provide a weekly ser- Transport and access ablement. This will necessitate vice. The transport assessment car- the appointment of more occupa- Once the new arrangements are ried out by Aberdeen University and tional therapists which is already in place, there will be improved ac- commissioned by the Badenoch happening. cess to on-site psychiatrists, with and Strathspey Transport Company NHS Highland is also pro- 24 hours a day, seven days a week has been ratified by the transport gressing work with partners to de- availability at New Craigs. and access sub-group. STRATHchat Page 3 Community Act Research planned considered in redesign plans THE Community Empowerment will need to have processes in DR Ellen Stewart, a researcher Act 2015 has been considered place to assess requests, deter- from Edinburgh University, is as part of the B&S redesign pro- mine if a group meets the require- looking at a number of case posals. ments of the act, and to implement studies across Scotland in- The Act has 12 parts and covers the necessary outcome improve- volving the redesign of health a wide range of issues. Most of the ment process. services, including any areas Act is not yet in force as the Scot- Notably, these participation re- where there are proposals to tish Government is in the process quests are to supplement and not close hospitals. of consultation on some of the draft replace consultation and engage- Her research questions will regulations. ment processes that public bodies include: Two key elements of the Act are already legally required to un- are: dertake. What types of knowledge and evidence inform deci- Participation requests Asset transfer requests sions to propose hospital A new way for communities to A process to allow a community closures in the NHS in Scotland? enter into dialogue with public bod- organisation to apply to buy, lease, ies on their own terms. Community manage or use publicly-owned What information do mem- bodies might use the act to discuss buildings or land. On receipt of a bers of the public draw on with service providers how they request, the public authority must when responding to a pro- could better meet the needs of us- assess the request’s economic, posed hospital closure? ers, to offer volunteers to support a social and environmental benefits How does the NHS involve service, or even propose to take- and whether it contributes to reduc- the public in decisions? over delivery of the service them- ing inequalities. selves. All community bodies making an Anyone interested in finding If a community body identifies asset transfer request must have a out more or participating in an issue, need or opportunity constitution. If a community body the research should contact where it believes it could help to wishes to buy rather than lease, Ellen: improve outcomes, it can then manage or use an asset, it must Ellen Stewart | Chief Scientist make a request to a public body to meet additional requirements. Office Postdoctoral Fellow take part in an outcome improve- Requests must be granted Centre for Population Health ment process. unless the public authority has rea- Sciences | University of Edin- Requests must be agreed sonable grounds to refuse. The burgh unless there are reasonable public body must have processes in [email protected] grounds for refusal. Public bodies place to handle such requests. STRATHchat Page 3 Who’s who on Recent community NHS Highland and staff updates project team REPRESENTATIVES on-Spey & Vicinity Com- from NHS Highland at- munity Council and NHS Key dates tended the Grantown- Highland websites. on-Spey and Vicinity At the meeting it was 31st May: Update Community Council on also agreed to hold some to board of NHS Tuesday 24th May. follow-up sessions later Highland Following a brief in the year specifically on presentation there was a how NHS Highland is series of question and delivering changes to 6th July: Project answers. care at home service to board The questions and increase capacity and discussion focused on: improve quality. Georgia Haire, 6th September: the need for flexible use NHS Highland will be project director beds in care homes; in- in contact with all com- Highland Council creased capacity for care munity councils in the area committee at home; clarification that area in due course to location of health centres offer to meet and provide 19th September: won’t be changing and an update on the redes- Transport and that there will be no ign. change to Scottish Am- There will also be an Access Group bulance Service’s ar- update to the Highland rangements in Grantown; Council Area Committee. 5th October: Pro- and the impact and op- The project board ject board portunities relating to the meets quarterly and in- Community Empower- cludes three public mem- ment Act (see previous bers: Alex Murray 29th November: page). (Grantown-on-Spey), Update to board The questions and Mairi Palmer of NHS Highland responses will be pub- (Newtonmore) and Coun- lished on the Grantown- cillor Jaci Douglas. Rhiannon Pitt, area manager How to find out more... FOR further updates on Alternatively, contact 01463 706712 the progress of the re- any of the following: [email protected] design work, there is a Boyd Peters dedicated section on the Maimie Thompson associate medical direc- NHS Highland website: head of PR and engage- tor /clinical lead http:// ment 079 767 105 69 www.nhshighland.scot.n 01463 704722 [email protected] hs.uk/News/ maimie.thompson@nhs.
Recommended publications
  • Argyll and Bute Council Best Value Audit 2015
    The Audit of Best Value and Community Planning Argyll and Bute Council Best Value audit 2015 Prepared by Audit Scotland December 2015 The Accounts Commission The Accounts Commission is the public spending watchdog for local government. We hold councils in Scotland to account and help them improve. We operate impartially and independently of councils and of the Scottish Government, and we meet and report in public. We expect councils to achieve the highest standards of governance and financial stewardship, and value for money in how they use their resources and provide their services. Our work includes: • securing and acting upon the external audit of Scotland’s councils and various joint boards and committees • assessing the performance of councils in relation to Best Value and community planning • carrying out national performance audits to help councils improve their services • requiring councils to publish information to help the public assess their performance. You can find out more about the work of the Accounts Commission on our website: www.audit-scotland.gov.uk/about/ac Audit Scotland is a statutory body set up in April 2000 under the Public Finance and Accountability (Scotland) Act 2000. We help the Auditor General for Scotland and the Accounts Commission check that organisations spending public money use it properly, efficiently and effectively. Argyll and Bute Council: Best Value Audit 2015 | 3 Contents Commission findings 4 Introduction 5 Summary 7 Audit assessment 9 Conclusions 24 Endnotes 26 4 | Commission findings 1 The Commission accepts this report by the Controller of Audit on progress made by Argyll and Bute Council since our 2013 and 2014 reports on Best Value in the council.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Borders Council Business Information Aug 10
    Scottish Borders Council Business Information Aug 10 GENERAL CONTACTS Borders College Our Scottish Borders Portal Scottish Borders Campus, Nether Road, www.ourscottishborders.com Galashiels, TD1 3HE [email protected] Tel: 08700 505152 [email protected] www.borderscollege.ac.uk Borders Construction Industry Forum Scottish Borders Chamber of Commerce East Port, Melrose, TD6 9EE Ettrick Riverside, Dunsdale Road, Tel: 01896 820469 Selkirk, TD7 5EB [email protected] www.bcif.org.uk Tel: 01750 505058 [email protected] www.borderschamber.org.uk Borders Health Board Scottish Borders Council Newstead, Melrose, TD6 9DB Council Headquarters, Newtown St. Boswells, Tel: 01896 825500 Melrose, TD6 0SA [email protected] Tel: 01835 824000 www.nhsborders.org.uk www.scotborders.gov.uk Business Gateway Scottish Borders Social Enterprise Chamber Ettrick Riverside, Dunsdale Road, 1 Orchard Park, St Boswells, TD6 0DA Selkirk, TD7 5EB Tel: 01835 822099 Tel: 0845 609 6611 [email protected] [email protected] www.sbsec.org.uk www.bgateway.com Eildon Enterprise Scottish Enterprise The Weaving Shed, Ettrick Mill, Dunsdale Road, Bridge Street, Galashiels, TD1 1SW Selkirk, TD7 5EB Tel: 01896 758991 Tel: 01750 725900 www.scottish-enterprise.com [email protected] www.eildon.org.uk Heriot Watt University VisitScotland Borders Scottish Borders Campus, Nether Road, Shepherds Mill, Whinfield Road, Galashiels, TD1 3HF Selkirk, TD7 5DT Tel: 01896 892133 Tel: 01750 20555 http://www.hw.ac.uk/student-life/ [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Services for Older Adults in Lochaber
    Services for Older Adults in Lochaber Mid Highland Community Health Partnership DRAFT Service Plan Proposal 5th DRAFT, 25th January, 2006 1 Contents 1. Introduction and Background 2. National Context 3. The Need for Change 4. Process to Date 5. Service Plan for the Future 6. Skills for Health 7. Well being and Health Improvement 8. Staff Governance 9. Resources 10.Next Steps Appendices 1. Rapid Re design methodology 2. Condition of Glencoe Hospital 3. Operational Policy for Intermediate Care 4. Draft Role, Remit and Membership of Implementation Group 5. Draft Action Plan 6. Bibliography 2 1. Introduction and Background This paper will describe proposals for changes in service provision for older people in Lochaber, that are in keeping with the „Delivering for Health‟ principles of more emphasis on care in the community, support for self care, anticipatory, proactive care and avoidance of hospital admissions. The building of a modernised community infrastructure will facilitate the shift in the balance of care away from hospital, into local communities and in people‟s own homes. Evidence from elsewhere has demonstrated that through timely interventions and support in the community, hospital admissions can be avoided. This shift has been part of the agenda for NHS and Partner agencies for some years and has been reinvigorated through the work of Professor Kerr, Delivering for Health and the 21st Century Social Work Review. There has been a gradual move to disinvest in NHS continuing care beds and, in Lochaber, there is a need to do so in Glencoe Hospital so that the resource can be re invested in a range of community based services which will provide for many more people than can be accommodated in a hospital building.
    [Show full text]
  • Argyll and Bute Council Best Value Audit 2015
    The Audit of Best Value and Community Planning Argyll and Bute Council Best Value audit 2015 Prepared by Audit Scotland December 2015 The Accounts Commission The Accounts Commission is the public spending watchdog for local government. We hold councils in Scotland to account and help them improve. We operate impartially and independently of councils and of the Scottish Government, and we meet and report in public. We expect councils to achieve the highest standards of governance and financial stewardship, and value for money in how they use their resources and provide their services. Our work includes: • securing and acting upon the external audit of Scotland’s councils and various joint boards and committees • assessing the performance of councils in relation to Best Value and community planning • carrying out national performance audits to help councils improve their services • requiring councils to publish information to help the public assess their performance. You can find out more about the work of the Accounts Commission on our website: www.audit-scotland.gov.uk/about/ac Audit Scotland is a statutory body set up in April 2000 under the Public Finance and Accountability (Scotland) Act 2000. We help the Auditor General for Scotland and the Accounts Commission check that organisations spending public money use it properly, efficiently and effectively. Argyll and Bute Council: Best Value Audit 2015 | 3 Contents Commission findings 4 Introduction 5 Summary 7 Audit assessment 9 Conclusions 24 Endnotes 26 4 | Commission findings 1 The Commission accepts this report by the Controller of Audit on progress made by Argyll and Bute Council since our 2013 and 2014 reports on Best Value in the council.
    [Show full text]
  • Caithness Profile Summary
    The Caithness Conversation Community Profile May 2013 Funded by RWE npower renewables i Glossary ....................................................................................... iv Introduction .................................................................................. x SECTION 1 – OBSERVATIONS BY FOUNDATION SCOTLAND ............. 1 SECTION 2 – THE PROFILE............................................................... 6 1 Geography and Administration ................................................. 6 2 Strategic Context ...................................................................... 8 3 Voluntary and Community Activity ......................................... 16 4 Population ............................................................................. 21 5 Economy ................................................................................ 26 6 Employment & Income Levels ................................................. 32 7 Education and Training ........................................................... 39 8 Transport and Access to Services ............................................ 43 9 Housing and Health ................................................................ 46 10 Natural and Cultural Heritage ................................................. 49 11 Caithness Profile summary ..................................................... 52 SECTION 3 – THE CAITHNESS CONVERSATION .............................. 54 1 Who participated in the Caithness Conversation? ................... 54 2 What was the methodology?
    [Show full text]
  • Lochaber Area Asset Management Plan
    The Highland Council Agenda 28 Item Resources Committee – 27th May 2015 Report RES/ No 55/15 Lochaber Area Asset Management Plan Report by Director of Development and Infrastructure Summary This report presents an overview of Corporate Property Asset Management and the development of Area Asset Management Plans. It highlights the findings and actions in the draft Lochaber Area Asset Management Plan and provides a progress update against the Plan actions. The report asks Resources Committee to agree the Lochaber Area Asset Management Plan as a Council plan. 1. Background 1.1 On 18th August 2010, Resources Committee agreed a “target operating model”1 for property which stated the need to develop: • a property strategy; and • Asset Management Plans against the overall aims, objectives and property strategy of the Council such that a coherent corporate plan is developed. 1.2 The Highland Council’s Corporate Property Strategy2 describes a strategic approach to property asset management to deliver an effective, efficient, and economic property portfolio that supports improved service delivery and the corporate aims and objectives. 1.3 The following agreed Corporate Property Asset Management (CPAM) objectives support the aims of the Corporate Property Strategy: a. Reduce the number of property assets held. b. Generate capital receipts from the disposal of property assets that can be reinvested. c. Reduce the overall revenue costs of owning and occupying property by holding fewer assets that are in better condition, and thereby spending less
    [Show full text]
  • Community Planning Governance, Operating and Financial Framework
    COMMUNITY PLANNING GOVERNANCE, OPERATING AND FINANCIAL FRAMEWORK As at 1 September 2010 1. DUMFRIES AND GALLOWAY STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP (16) Dumfries and Galloway Council 5 Political Group Leaders Chief Executive Dumfries and Galloway Chief Constable Constabulary NHS Dumfries and Galloway Chair Chief Executive Private Sector 2 representatives Regional Transport Partnership Chairman Scottish Enterprise Regional Director South Third Sector 2 representatives from Voluntary Sector 1 representative from Community Councils to be implemented when arrangements are in place for the democratic selection of a representative Observer Scottish Government 1 Director Dumfries and Galloway Strategic Partnership is a partnership of agencies and organisations from the public, private, voluntary and community sectors that have an interest in Dumfries and Galloway. It is an unincorporated body. The aim of the Strategic Partnership is to work together ‘to create an ambitious, prosperous and confident Dumfries and Galloway where people achieve their potential’. Remit • Set out a joint vision and high level outcomes for Dumfries and Galloway in the form of a Community Plan and Single Outcome Agreement • Set out the contribution expected from partners towards delivering these outcomes • Monitor and evaluate progress on agreed outcomes, and receive regular reports on these. Identify and agree corrective action where appropriate • Identify and secure the resources necessary to achieve the agreed outcomes • Influence the national agenda to secure the best outcomes
    [Show full text]
  • What General Comments Would You Like to Make Regarding the Commission's Proposals for Councillor Numbers and Wards in Highland C
    What comments would you like to make What comments would you like to make What comments would you like to make What comments would you like to make What comments would you like to make What comments would you like to make What comments would you like to make What comments would you like to make What comments would you like to make What comments would you like to make regarding the number of councillors and ward What comments would you like to make What comments would you like to make regarding the number of councillors and ward What comments would you like to make What comments would you like to make What comments would you like to make What comments would you like to make What comments would you like to make regarding the What comments would you like to make What comments would you like to make regarding the number of councillors and ward regarding the number of councillors and ward What general comments would you like to make regarding the Commission's regarding the number of councillors and ward regarding the number of councillors and ward regarding the number of councillors and ward regarding the number of councillors and ward regarding the number of councillors and ward regarding the number of councillors and ward boundaries for the proposed Tain, Easter Ross regarding the number of councillors and ward regarding the number of councillors and ward What comments would you like to make regarding the number of boundaries for the proposed Caol, Mallaig and regarding the number of councillors and ward regarding the number of councillors
    [Show full text]
  • Argyll and Bute Council Bute and Cowal Area Committee
    ARGYLL AND BUTE COUNCIL BUTE AND COWAL AREA COMMITTEE ROADS AND 1 SEPTEMBER 2020 INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES ROADS AND INFRASTRUCTURE REVENUE AND CAPITAL UPDATE 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 The Roads and Infrastructure team deliver a wide range of works including street cleansing, the upkeep of public conveniences, grass cutting, refuse collection, burials, road maintenance and street lighting marine activities, fleet, waste disposal and engineering design. The service redesign introduced in December 2018 refocused the Network and Standards team who now support Operations with programming, obtaining consents and permissions and co-ordinating a support mechanism which enables the Operations team to focus on delivering works safely, to specification, to programme and within budget. As part of the wider support a control HUB has been established. The HUB will not only provide support to the operations team but also provides support to Elected Members by providing information and briefings. 1.2 This report provides an update of the Roads and Infrastructure Services operational capital and revenue matters relating to roads and grounds maintenance activities in the Bute and Cowal area. 1.3 It is recommended that Members note and consider the update. ARGYLL AND BUTE COUNCIL BUTE AND COWAL AREA COMMITTEE ROADS AND 1 SEPTEMBER 2020 INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES ROADS AND INFRASTRUCTURE REVENUE AND CAPITAL UPDATE 2.0 INTRODUCTION 2.1 This report provides a summary of activity carried out by the operations team across the Bute and Cowal Area Committee Area. 3.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 3.1 It is recommended that Members note and consider the update. 4.0 DETAIL 4.1 Much of the cyclic and ‘normal’ works carried out by our teams for the first months of this financial year has been reprioritised following Scotland entering lockdown on 23rd March 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Member Handbook Your Guide to Competition Incorporating Rules & Regulations 2017
    British Showjumping Member Handbook Your guide to competition Incorporating Rules & Regulations 2017 Effective from 1 January 2017 www.britishshowjumping.co.uk ©British Showjumping 2 Member Information Introduction The Rules in this book are established so that competitors may compete against each other in showjumping competitions under fair conditions. They can, however, never cover every eventuality. Matters that cannot be solved by interpreting the Rules to the letter should be resolved by following as nearly as possible the spirit of the text to obtain the solution that is fairest to all competitors. This handbook supersedes all previous publications and is subject to change from time to time by the Board in respect of operational/exceptional matters. Equality Statement British Showjumping is fully committed to the principles of equality of opportunity and aims to ensure that no individual receives less favourable treatment on the grounds of age, gender, disability, race, ethnic origin, nationality, colour, parental or marital status, pregnancy, religious belief, class or social background, sexual orientation or political belief. Including all those involved in whatever capacity, riders, employees, coaches, officials, other volunteers and spectators. British Showjumping will ensure, wherever it is reasonable and within British Showjumping's direct control, that there is open access to all those who wish to participate in all aspects of equestrian activity and that they are treated fairly. Welfare of The Horse See Annex A at the end of Section 1. Code of Conduct for Junior Members See Annex B. Financial Responsibility British Showjumping accepts no financial responsibility in respect of affiliated or unaffiliated shows. Offices British Showjumping Meriden Business Park, Copse Drive, Meriden, West Midlands, CV5 9RG.
    [Show full text]
  • HIGHLAND 04.Indd
    Local Government Boundary Commission for Scotland Fourth Statutory Review of Electoral Arrangements Highland Council Area Report E06016 Report to Scottish Ministers August 2006 Local Government Boundary Commission for Scotland Fourth Statutory Review of Electoral Arrangements Highland Council Area Constitution of the Commission Chairman: Mr John L Marjoribanks Deputy Chairman: Mr Brian Wilson OBE Commissioners: Professor Hugh M Begg Dr A Glen Mr K McDonald Mr R Millham Report Number E06016 August 2006 Highland Council Area 1 Local Government Boundary Commission for Scotland 2 Highland Council Area Fourth Statutory Review of Electoral Arrangements Contents Page Summary Page 7 Part 1 Background Pages 9 – 14 Paragraphs Origin of the Review 1 The Local Governance (Scotland) Act 2004 2 – 4 Commencement of the 2004 Act 5 Directions from Scottish Ministers 6 – 9 Announcement of our Review 10 – 16 General Issues 17 – 18 Defi nition of Electoral Ward Boundaries 19 – 24 Electorate Data used in the Review 25 – 26 Part 2 The Review in Highland Council Area Pages 15 – 32 Paragraphs Meeting with The Highland Council 1 – 3 Concluded View of the Council 4 – 6 Aggregation of Existing Wards 7 – 12 Initial Proposals 13 – 21 Informing the Council of our Initial Proposals 22 – 23 The Highland Council Response 24 – 29 Consideration of the Council Response to the Initial Proposals 30 – 36 Provisional Proposals 37 – 41 Representations 42 Consideration of Representations 43 – 59 Revised Proposals 60 – 61 Representations on Revised Proposals 62 Consideration of
    [Show full text]
  • SCOTTISH BORDERS 03.Indd
    Local Government Boundary Commission for Scotland Fourth Statutory Review of Electoral Arrangements Scottish Borders Council Area Report E06026 Report to Scottish Ministers July 2006 Local Government Boundary Commission for Scotland Fourth Statutory Review of Electoral Arrangements Scottish Borders Council Area Constitution of the Commission Chairman: Mr John L Marjoribanks Deputy Chairman: Mr Brian Wilson OBE Commissioners: Professor Hugh M Begg Dr A Glen Mr K McDonald Mr R Millham Report Number E06026 July 2006 Scottish Borders Council Area 1 Local Government Boundary Commission for Scotland 2 Scottish Borders Council Area Fourth Statutory Review of Electoral Arrangements Contents Page Summary Page 7 Part 1 Background Pages 9 – 14 Paragraphs Origin of the Review 1 The Local Governance (Scotland) Act 2004 2 – 4 Commencement of the 2004 Act 5 Directions from Scottish Ministers 6 – 9 Announcement of our Review 10 – 16 General Issues 17 – 18 Defi nition of Electoral Ward Boundaries 19 – 24 Electorate Data used in the Review 25 – 26 Part 2 The Review in Scottish Borders Council Area Pages 15 – 26 Paragraphs Meeting with the Scottish Borders Council 1 – 3 Concluded View of the Council 4 – 7 Aggregation of Existing Wards 8 – 11 Initial Proposals 12 – 19 Informing the Council of our Initial Proposals 20 – 21 The Scottish Borders Council Response 22 – 23 Consideration of the Council Response to the Initial Proposals 24 – 30 Provisional Proposals 31 – 35 Representations 36 Consideration of Representations 37 – 46 Part 3 Final Recommendation Pages
    [Show full text]