DOCSLIB.ORG

Abolishing the Toxic “Tough-On-Immigration” Paradigm

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Abolishing the Toxic “Tough-On-Immigration” Paradigm Feature Abolishing the Toxic “Tough-on-Immigration” Paradigm Felipe Hernández “The greatest purveyor of violence in the Introduction world today [is] my own government.” – In October 2018, a caravan of about 7,000 Dr. Martin Luther King (1967)1 people from Central America seeking ref- uge from extortion, state and gang violence, Abstract femicide, and the effects of climate change This article contextualizes and examines were violently met with hundreds of Federal the tough-on-immigration paradigm that has Mexican Police forces on the Guatemala– driven both Republican and Democratic Mexico border armed with tactical gear immigration policies. First, this article traces and training largely provided by the United the evolution of the sociopolitical construct States.2,3 As if preparing for war, Trump mobi- of the undeserving criminal alien, a non- lized nearly 6,000 troops on the US–Mexico White person deemed a threat to White border, issued an executive order authorizing free personhood, to demonstrate how this military personnel to use “force [including construct legitimizes tough-on-immigration lethal force, where necessary],”4 and issued policy prescriptions. Second, the article a proclamation suspending asylum rights for demonstrates how elected offcials since the all people on the caravan because “the mass Reagan administration have crafted immi- migration of aliens with no basis for admission gration policies solely through the tough-on- . precipitated a crisis.”5 When the caravan immigration paradigm as a tactic to obtain arrived at San Ysidro, Customs and Border political power. Third, this article illustrates Patrol (CBP) shut down the border and fred how both political parties leading up to the rubber bullets and tear gas to prevent them 2020 presidential election continue to pre- from crossing. Meanwhile, on the US side of serve the tough-on-immigration paradigm the border, nearly 15,000 children and thou- even in opposition to the Trump adminis- sands of adults, a majority of whom are from tration. Finally, the article proposes a new Central America, were held in cages, often up reparative justice paradigm for immigration to 20 people in one, causing abuse, trauma, policy that follows the lead of organizers and and the deaths of two children.6,7,8 In the back- those directly impacted in order to address the drop, the government was shut down over root causes of human displacement. Trump’s border wall by falsely declaring that Volume 31 | 2019 45 Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3444515 immigrants were fooding the border bringing center of this toxic cycle are the millions of crime, drugs, and violence.9 human beings whose dreams, hopes, and bod- While Trump’s actions against immigrants ies are bruised, abused, and disposed as if they have been overwhelming, they are not new. were meaningless byproducts of the law-and- Rather, they stem from the toxic cycle of order system of subordination.21,22 tough-on-immigration policies built across Historically, despite state repression coali- multiple administrations. This cycle uses tions of multiethnic, immigrant, and working- state-sanctioned violence such as military class peoples, particularly along border states, force, caging, and policing to separate families immigrants have successfully organized to and control displaced people as an ordinary challenge the law-and-order system to se- practice to maintain the dominant law-and- cure labor, immigrant, and civil rights and order system of subordination to divide social liberties.23 Such movements, often led by and political mobility on a global hierarchy by women and queer folx of color, have recog- race, class, gender, sexuality, and citizenship nized that struggles against prisons, police, status.10,11 The tough-on-immigration toxic state violence, capitalism, imperialism, and cycle, a global phenomenon, begins with the military occupations are inextricably linked false—but powerfully persuasive—dehuman- izing narrative that “illegal (criminal) aliens,” The tough-on-immigration toxic cycle… particularly from non-European “shithole” begins with the false—but powerfully countries, are invaders threatening the eco- persuasive—dehumanizing narrative nomic, social, moral, and political interests that “illegal (criminal) aliens,” …are of the country’s citizens. Once designated as threats and undesired populations, immi- invaders threatening the economic, social, grants are systematically linked to criminality moral, and political interests of to facilitate their permanent exploitation and the country’s citizens. marginalization, positioned against a strug- gling poor White class.12 This positioning to the global immigrant struggle.24,25 Yet the then moves those with political power, i.e., dominant discourse for immigration reform is poor White class, to legitimize the use of the often presented as a binary that supports the police, prisons, and the criminal legal sys- deserving immigrant while punishing the tem to control or eliminate the “criminal undeserving “criminal alien” via increased alien.”13,14,15 Throughout this entire process, border security and detention policies.26 Such corporate shareholders, politicians, and social binary organizing has led to some temporary, elites reap massive benefts from investing in and important, wins, such as the Deferred the law-and-order system that punishes and re- Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) pro- moves the “criminal alien” as a means to reg- gram, the 1986 Immigration Reform and ulate a stable global supply of labor to exploit Control Act, stopping the 2005 Sensenbrenner from predominantly non-White people with Immigration Bill (H.R. 4437), suspending little to no legal and political powers to resist, Sessions’s zero-tolerance policy, sanctuary i.e., factory workers, farm laborers, and domes- bills, and various state wins. However, as legal tic workers.16 In doing so, elite corporate and scholar Angelica Chazaro recently outlined, political classes facilitate a global social strati- the binary framing has also widened who fcation by creating a race to the bottom and qualifes as the undeserving “criminal alien” social death of undesirable groups through and strengthened the deportation machine.27 state violence like private prisons or mili- Today, both parties operate solely within the tarized borders, for example.17,18,19,20 At the dominant binary evident by their immigration 46 Harvard Kennedy School Journal of Hispanic Policy Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3444515 policy proposals: both call for tougher bor- protect and advance all economic, civil, and der security, more funds for detention and political interests of White citizens while de- deportation, and prioritized removals of the nying, or at the expense of, noncitizens (i.e., criminal alien, despite rejecting President non-Whites).32,33 Rooted in the historical Trump’s demand for a physical border wall.28 practice of European conquest-violence and Ultimately, as immigrant-rights groups like under the doctrine of Manifest Destiny, the United We Dream have recognized, tough-on- myth of Anglo-Saxon superiority, embedded immigration politics only marginally help the in US citizenship, was created by political small portion of immigrants characterized as and economic elites to convince a majority deserving at the expense of feeding more and poor White populace that they were entitled more people designated as criminal aliens to the lands, and fruits from those lands, they through the deportation machine.29 occupied by eliminating Native Americans This article has three aims. First, it traces and non-White Mexican peoples—both the evolution of the sociopolitical construct of characterized as sub-species invaders who the undeserving criminal alien to demonstrate were inherently vicious and criminal without how it serves as the basis for the tough-on- any right to land—as well as by subjecting immigration paradigm and, thus, toxic Black people to slavery and bondage.34,35,36 immigration policies. Second, this article Accordingly, in 1798, Congress passed the demonstrates how the tough-on-immigration Alien and Sedition Acts, which made aliens paradigm continues to shape immigration “liable to be apprehended, restrained, secured, policy across both parties today. Third, this and removed” during wartime under orders of article calls for the abolition of the tough-on- the president—a precursor to Trump’s emer- immigration paradigm and highlights the gency powers.37 By the 1820s, as the United calls of organizers for a new reparative justice States occupied western Mexican and Native paradigm. This new paradigm must reconcile lands, US settlers developed a complex and how the US law-and-order capitalist system proftable system of leased convict labor in continues to produce mass global human which those labeled as noncitizens or aliens, displacement, violence, and instability, pri- overwhelmingly Native, African, mulatto, and marily from communities of color in the mestizo people, were imprisoned on public global south, for exploitative labor practices charges (e.g., sleeping on the street, requiring as well as how the criminal and immigration public assistance) or as enemies of war. This legal systems are used as a social death “purga- included criminalizing habits of immigrants tory” for people designated as undesirable or that were deemed to threaten White people, criminal aliens.30 like the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, which criminalized opium smoking on the notion
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tracking the Biden Agenda on Immigration Enforcement
    SPECIAL REPORT TRACKING THE BIDEN AGENDA ON IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT by Jorge Loweree and Aaron Reichlin-Melnick About the American Immigration Council The American Immigration Council works to strengthen America by shaping how America thinks about and acts towards immigrants and immigration and by working toward a more fair and just immigration system that opens its doors to those in need of protection and unleashes the energy and skills that immigrants bring. Through its research and analysis, the American Immigration Council provides policymakers, the media, and the general public with information about how the immigration system works, the impact of policy proposals, and the crucial role that immigration plays in our communities and workplaces. Visit us at www.AmericanImmigrationCouncil.org and www.ImmigrationImpact.com. About the Authors Jorge Loweree is the Director of Policy at the American Immigration Council, where he directs the Council’s administrative and legislative advocacy and leads the Council’s efforts to provide lawmakers, policymakers, advocates, and the general public with accurate and timely information about the role of immigrants in the United States. Previously, Jorge spent ten years in a variety of positions with the U.S. House of Representatives, most recently as Senior Counsel for Immigration Law and Policy, working on a wide range of enforcement and benefits issues. Jorge holds a J.D. from the University of Colorado Law School and Bachelor of Arts in Mathematics from the Saint Mary’s University. Aaron Reichlin-Melnick is Policy Counsel at the American Immigration Council, where he works primarily on immigration court issues and the intersection of immigration law and policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Immigration Enforcement Actions: 2019
    Immigration Enforcement Actions: 2019 MIKE GUO SEPTEMBER 2020 INTRODUCTION • ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) engages in initiated 29 percent more intakes into immigration immigration enforcement actions to prevent unlawful detention, with detentions of aliens from Mexico entry into the United States and to apprehend and and the Northern Triangle of Central America repatriate aliens who have violated or failed to comply accounting for 82 percent of all detentions. with U.S. immigration laws. The primary responsibility • DHS performed 9.5 percent more removals in 2019 for the enforcement of immigration law within DHS than in 2018, with about 43 percent of removals rests with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and involving aliens who had a prior criminal U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). CBP conviction. primarily enforces immigration laws along the borders and at ports of entry (POEs) and ICE is responsible for ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS PROCESSES interior enforcement and most detention and removal operations. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Determinations of Inadmissibility (USCIS) adjudicates applications and petitions for All aliens seeking admission at a POE are subject to immigration and naturalization benefits. inspection. OFO officers conduct these inspections at designated POEs and at pre-clearance locations at The 2019 Immigration Enforcement Actions Annual Flow Report, certain foreign ports. Applicants for admission who are authored by the DHS Office of Immigration Statistics determined to be inadmissible may be permitted to (OIS), presents information on DHS immigration voluntarily withdraw their application for admission enforcement actions during 2019.1 This includes and return to their home country, processed for determinations of inadmissibility by CBP Office of expedited removal, referred to an immigration judge Field Operations (OFO) officers, apprehensions by CBP (IJ) for removal proceedings, processed for a visa U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Reasons Why Congress Should Defund ICE's Deportation Force
    Boston College Law School Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School Boston College Law School Faculty Papers 1-1-2019 10 Reasons Why Congress Should Defund ICE’s Deportation Force Kari E. Hong Boston College Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/lsfp Part of the Administrative Law Commons, Immigration Law Commons, and the Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons Recommended Citation Kari E. Hong. "10 Reasons Why Congress Should Defund ICE’s Deportation Force." NYU Review of Law & Social Change Harbinger 43, (2019). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Law School Faculty Papers by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 10 REASONS WHY CONGRESS SHOULD DEFUND ICE’S DEPORTATION FORCE KARI HONG¥ Calls to abolish ICE, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency tasked with deportations, are growing.1 ICE consists of two agencies – Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), which investigates transnational criminal matters, and Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO), which deports non-citizens. The calls to abolish ICE focus on the latter, the ERO deportation force. Defenders proffer that the idea is silly,2 that abolition could harm public safety,3 or that advocates of abolition must first explain what, if anything, would replace the agency.4 Those reasons are not persuasive.
    [Show full text]
  • Border Security and the Southwest Border: Background, Legislation, and Issues
    Border Security and the Southwest Border: Background, Legislation, and Issues Lisa M. Seghetti, Coordinator Section Research Manager (name redacted) Analyst in Domestic Security (name redacted) Analyst in Domestic Security (name redacted) Specialist in Immigration Policy September 28, 2005 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov RL33106 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Border Security and the Southwest Border: Background, Legislation, and Issues Summary Border security has emerged as an area of public concern, particularly after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. Although recent public concerns pertaining to border security may be attributed to the threat of potential terrorists coming into the country, past concerns that centered around drug and human smuggling and the illegal entry of migrants remain important issues. As Congress passes legislation to enhance border security (e.g., P.L. 109-13) and the Administration puts into place procedures to tighten border enforcement, concerns over terrorists exploiting the porous southwest border continue to grow. The U.S. border with Mexico is some 2,000 miles long, with more than 800,000 people arriving from Mexico daily and more than 4 million commercial crossings annually. The United States and Mexico are linked together in various ways, including through trade, investment, migration, tourism, environment, and familial relationships. Mexico is the second most important trading partner of the United States and this trade is critical to many U.S. industries and border communities. In an effort to facilitate the legitimate flow of travel and trade, the governments of the United States and Mexico signed the U.S.-Mexico Border Partnership agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Cuc Vu, Director
    Cuc Vu, Director July 3, 2019 Submitted via email OMB USCIS Desk Officer [email protected] Re: Agency USCIS, OMB Control Number 1615-0116 - Public Comment Opposing Changes to Fee Waiver Eligibility Criteria, Agency Information Collection Activities: Revision of a Currently Approved Collection: Request for Fee Waiver FR Doc. 2019-11744, Filed 6-5-19; 84 FR 26137 Dear Desk Officer: The City of Seattle (“the City”) submits this comment in response to the proposed revision of a currently approved collection published by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) in their Agency Information Collection Notice published on June 5, 2019. We are responding to the lack of response to the public comments previously submitted on April 5, 2019 and to address the inadequacy of responses by USCIS to comments submitted in response to their Notice of Revision of Currently Approved Collection published on September 28, 2018. The City of Seattle continues to strongly oppose the proposed rule to modify Form I-912, Request for Fee Waiver. The City of Seattle created the Office of Immigrant and Refugee Affairs (OIRA) in 2012 to improve the lives of Seattle’s immigrant and refugee families. Through OIRA, the City of Seattle funds and coordinates two naturalization programs called the New Citizen Campaign (NCC) and the New Citizen Program (NCP) to help an estimated 75,000 Seattle-area legal permanent residents (“LPR”) become U.S. citizens. Since its inception in 1997, NCP has served over 19,000 people, provided naturalization assistance to over 12,300 LPRs, successfully naturalized 9,500 LPRs, and provided over 90,000 hours of citizenship instruction.
    [Show full text]
  • Border Myths: How U.S. Policies and Practices Are Controlling the Border Narrative at the Expense of Asylum Seekers
    Woods: Border Myths: How U.S. Policies and Practices Are Controlling the Woods camera ready (Do Not Delete) 1/18/2020 12:00 PM BORDER MYTHS: HOW U.S. POLICIES AND PRACTICES ARE CONTROLLING THE BORDER NARRATIVE AT THE EXPENSE OF ASYLUM SEEKERS CINDY S. WOODS* TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................. 82 I. TRUMP’S BORDER WALL IMPERATIVE ...................................... 84 II. INTERNATIONAL LAW OBLIGATIONS AND THE UNITED STATES’ APPROACH TO ASYLUM SEEKERS ................................... 87 A. International Law Obligations to Asylum Seekers ....... 88 1. The Non-Refoulement Principle ............................. 88 a. Non-Rejection ................................................... 89 b. Access to Fair and Efficient Asylum Procedures ................................................ 90 B. U.S. Interpretations of International Obligations ........ 91 1. Exclusion of the Non-Rejection Principle ............. 92 2. Punitive Measures for Illegal Entrants ................. 93 3. Expedited Removal and the Credible Fear Process ............................................................... 94 III. THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION’S ATTEMPTS TO CONTROL THE BORDER NARRATIVE ............................................................. 96 A. Port of Entry Denials .................................................. 96 B. CBP Abuse at the Border .......................................... 102 C. Increased Prosecution of Illegal Border Crossers ... 107 * J.D. Georgetown University Law
    [Show full text]
  • Harvard Kennedy School Journal of Hispanic Policy a Harvard Kennedy School Student Publication
    Harvard Kennedy School Journal of Hispanic Policy A Harvard Kennedy School Student Publication Volume 30 Staff Kristell Millán Editor-in-Chief Estivaliz Castro Senior Editor Alberto I. Rincon Executive Director Bryan Cortes Senior Editor Leticia Rojas Managing Editor, Print Jazmine Garcia Delgadillo Senior Amanda R. Matos Managing Editor, Editor Digital Daniel Gonzalez Senior Editor Camilo Caballero Director, Jessica Mitchell-McCollough Senior Communications Editor Rocio Tua Director, Alumni & Board Noah Toledo Senior Editor Relations Max Wynn Senior Editor Sara Agate Senior Editor Martha Foley Publisher Elizabeth Castro Senior Editor Richard Parker Faculty Advisor Recognition of Former Editors A special thank you to the former editors Alex Rodriguez, 1995–96 of the Harvard Kennedy School Journal of Irma Muñoz, 1996–97 Hispanic Policy, previously known as the Myrna Pérez, 1996–97 Harvard Journal of Hispanic Policy, whose Eraina Ortega, 1998–99 legacy continues to be a source of inspira- Nereyda Salinas, 1998–99 tion for Latina/o students Harvard-wide. Raúl Ruiz, 1999–2000 Maurilio León, 1999–2000 Henry A.J. Ramos, Founding Editor, Sandra M. Gallardo, 2000–01 1984–86 Luis S. Hernandez Jr., 2000–01 Marlene M. Morales, 1986–87 Karen Hakime Bhatia, 2001–02 Adolph P. Falcón, 1986–87 Héctor G. Bladuell, 2001–02 Kimura Flores, 1987–88 Jimmy Gomez, 2002–03 Luis J. Martinez, 1988–89 Elena Chávez, 2003–04 Genoveva L. Arellano, 1989–90 Adrian J. Rodríguez, 2004–05 David Moguel, 1989–90 Edgar A. Morales, 2005–06 Carlo E. Porcelli, 1990–91 Maria C. Alvarado, 2006–07 Laura F. Sainz, 1990–91 Tomás J. García, 2007–08 Diana Tisnado, 1991–92 Emerita F.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Publication
    LATINO IMMIGRANTS IN THE WINDY CITY: New Trends in Civic Engagement Authors: Judith Boruchoff Katz Center for Mexican Studies, University of Chicago Oscar A. Chacón National Alliance of Latin American and Caribbean Communities Susan R. Gzesh Human Rights Program, University of Chicago Amalia Pallares Latin American and Latino Studies Program University of Illinois at Chicago Rebecca Vonderlack-Navarro School of Social Work University of Chicago Rapporteur’s report by: Amy Shannon Charles Stewart Mott Foundation Editors: Xóchitl Bada University of Illinois at Chicago Oscar A. Chacón National Alliance of Latin American and Caribbean Communities Jonathan Fox University of California, Santa Cruz Authors: Judith Boruchoff, Oscar A. Chacón, Susan R. Gzesh, Amalia Pallares, Amy Shannon, and Rebecca Vonderlack-Navarro Copyeditor: Leah Florence Series Editors: Xóchitl Bada, Jonathan Fox, and Andrew Selee Coordinators: Kate Brick and Robert Donnelly www.wilsoncenter.org/migrantparticipation Preferred citation: Bada, Xóchitl, Oscar A. Chacón, and Jonathan Fox, Eds. Latino Immigrants in the Windy City: New Trends in Civic Engagement, Reports on Latino Immigrant Civic Engagement, No. 6. Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, January 2010. © 2010, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars Cover images: At top, members of the honor guard of the Club Ciudad Hidalgo (Michoacán) hometown association participate in a ceremony commemorating the birth of Mexican President Benito Juárez at the Plaza de las Américas in Chicago, IL, on March 21, 2009. At bottom, dancers affiliated with Ballet Folclórico de Víctor Soria are photographed at the same ceremony. (Photos by Claudio Ugalde) CONTENTS PREFACE 5 PROLOGUE 6 Chicago Community Dialogue: A Step toward Stronger Transnational Collaboration Oscar A.
    [Show full text]
  • Mexican and Central American Asylum and Credible Fear Claims Background and Context
    MEXICAN AND CENTRAL AMERICAN ASYLUM AND CREDIBLE FEAR CLAIMS Background and Context By Sara Campos, Esq. and Joan Friedland, Esq. Special Report | May 2014 MEXICAN AND CENTRAL AMERICAN ASYLUM AND CREDIBLE FEAR CLAIMS BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT ABOUT THE AUTHORS Sara Campos, Esq. is a writer, lawyer, and consultant specializing in immigration and refugee issues. Before working independently, she was a Staff Attorney for the National Immigration Law Center and the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area. She also taught Refugee Law at Golden Gate University and USF Law Schools. Joan Friedland, Esq., was Managing Attorney at the National Immigration Law Center in Washington, D.C. until 2011. She worked for many years with non-profits and in private practice in New Mexico and Florida, practicing primarily in the areas of civil rights, immigration, and criminal law. She is a graduate of Harvard Law School and currently lives in New Mexico. ABOUT THE AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL The American Immigration Council’s policy mission is to shape a rational conversation on immigration and immigrant integration. Through its research and analysis, the Immigration Council provides policymakers, the media, and the general public with accurate information about the role of immigrants and immigration policy in U.S. society. Our reports and materials are widely disseminated and relied upon by press and policymakers. Our staff regularly serves as experts to leaders on Capitol Hill, opinion-makers, and the media. We are a non-partisan organization that neither supports nor opposes any political party or candidate for office. Visit our website at www.immigrationpolicy.org and our blog at www.immigrationimpact.com.
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC CHARGE and the THREAT to IMMIGRANT FAMILIES in CALIFORNIA Reducing the Chilling Effect on Medi-Cal Participation
    PUBLIC CHARGE AND THE THREAT TO IMMIGRANT FAMILIES IN CALIFORNIA Reducing the Chilling Effect on Medi-Cal Participation Grace Kim • Renee Lahey • Marcus Silva • Sean Tan CALIFORNIA IMMIGRANT POLICY CENTER ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thank you to the following individuals whose significant contributions were instrumental in developing this report: Prof. Mark A. Peterson, Primary Advisor Prof. Wesley Yin, Second Advisor Almas Sayeed, California Immigrant Policy Center Irma Livadic, Iman Nanji, Josh Summers, Caio Velasco, Ryan Weinberg; Peer Reviewers We would also like to thank the following individuals for their help in refining our analysis: Nancy Aspaturian Hon. Brian Nestande Adam Barsch Mike Odeh Connie Choi Prof. Ninez Ponce Prof. Darin Christensen Prof. Sarah Reber Madeleine Ildefonso Eric Schattl Mitchell Jacobs Kristen Golden Testa Sabrina Kim Prof. Abel Valenzuela Prof. Gerald Kominski Virdiana Velez Marielle Kress Joseph Villela Thai Le Prof. Steve Wallace Laurel Lucia AJ Young Disclaimer This report was prepared in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Public Policy degree in the Department of Public Policy at the University of California, Los Angeles. It was prepared at the direction of the Department and the California Immigrant Policy Center as a policy client. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Department, the UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs, UCLA as a whole, or the client. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 5 Glossary 6 Acronyms and Initialisms 7 Chapter
    [Show full text]
  • Why Reorganization-Oriented Abolitionism Won't Meaningfully Change Ice
    NOTES SEPARATING THE HANDS: WHY REORGANIZATION-ORIENTED ABOLITIONISM WON'T MEANINGFULLY CHANGE ICE CASEY L. CHALBECK* ªUnder this president, who's now letting us do our job and taking the hand- cuffs off the men and women of the Border Patrol and ICE, arrests are up.º ± Thomas Homan, Former Immigration and Customs Enforcement Acting Director.1 ªAny essential functions carried out by ICE that do not violate funda- mental due process and human rights can be executed with greater transparency, public accountability, and adherence to domestic and international law by other Federal agencies.º ± Establishing a Humane Immigration Enforcement System Act. 2 * Casey L. Chalbeck, J.D. Candidate, 2020, Georgetown University Law Center. I would like to thank the participants of the Administrative Law and Public Administration Seminar, including Kerissa Barron, Ian Bruckner, Matthew Caplan, Gary DePalo, Isaac Hoenig, Alexandra Keck, Mitchell Mengden, Kate Rheaume, Danielle Robinette, Louis Rosenbaum, Julia Siegenberg, and Parnia Zahedi for their helpful comments during the drafting stages of this Note. I owe additional thanks to the editors of the Georgetown Immigration Law Journal for their outstanding work. This project bene®ted from Annamaria Morales-Kimball's intensive and thoughtful engagement, which made every part better. Two people merit special acknowledgment. This piece ± and so much more ± would not have been possible without Professor Eloise Pasachoff's careful feedback, constructive criticism, guidance, and mentorship; I am grateful to be her student. And, ®nally, I am most grateful to Sam Grayck for her commitment to in- tellectual production, willingness to interrogate that which we hold obvious, brilliant ideas, inspiring work ethic, and steadfast support.
    [Show full text]
  • Immigration Policy As a Defense of White Nationhood
    ARTICLE Immigration Policy as a Defense of White Nationhood JUAN F. PEREA* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. THE FRAMERS’ WISH FOR A WHITE AMERICA . 3 II. THE CYCLES OF MEXICAN EXPULSION ........................ 5 III. DEPORTATION AND MASS EXPULSION: SOCIAL CONTROL TO KEEP AMERICA WHITE ............................................ 11 President Trump has declared war on undocumented immigrants. Attempting to motivate his voters before the 2018 mid-term elections, President Trump sought to sow fear by escalating his anti-immigrant rhetoric.1 Trump labeled a caravan of Central American refugees seeking asylum as an “invasion” and a “crisis” that demanded, in his view, the use of military troops to defend the U.S. border with Mexico.2 When the caravan arrived, the border patrol used tear gas on the refugees, including mothers with infant children.3 Trump also referred to undocumented immigrants as criminals, rapists, and gang members who pose a direct threat to the welfare of “law-abiding” people.4 Despite the imagery of invasion, crisis, and crime disseminated by President Trump, undocumented immigrants pose no such threats. The number of * Curt and Linda Rodin Professor of Law and Social Justice, Loyola University Chicago School of Law. © 2020, Juan F. Perea. Thanks to Ala Salameh for expert research assistance on this project. Thanks to Valencia Richardson, Cindy Anderson and the editors of the Georgetown Journal of Law and Modern Critical Race Perspectives for their able assistance with this article. The author also appreciates the support of Loyola University of Chicago’s Summer Research Grant Program. 1. See Alan Gomez, Central American Migrants Keep Heading Towards USA Even as Trump Focuses on Stopping Caravan, USA TODAY (Jan.
    [Show full text]