Download the Publication
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Chicago Neighborhood Resource Directory Contents Hgi
CHICAGO NEIGHBORHOOD [ RESOURCE DIRECTORY san serif is Univers light 45 serif is adobe garamond pro CHICAGO NEIGHBORHOOD RESOURCE DIRECTORY CONTENTS hgi 97 • CHICAGO RESOURCES 139 • GAGE PARK 184 • NORTH PARK 106 • ALBANY PARK 140 • GARFIELD RIDGE 185 • NORWOOD PARK 107 • ARCHER HEIGHTS 141 • GRAND BOULEVARD 186 • OAKLAND 108 • ARMOUR SQUARE 143 • GREATER GRAND CROSSING 187 • O’HARE 109 • ASHBURN 145 • HEGEWISCH 188 • PORTAGE PARK 110 • AUBURN GRESHAM 146 • HERMOSA 189 • PULLMAN 112 • AUSTIN 147 • HUMBOLDT PARK 190 • RIVERDALE 115 • AVALON PARK 149 • HYDE PARK 191 • ROGERS PARK 116 • AVONDALE 150 • IRVING PARK 192 • ROSELAND 117 • BELMONT CRAGIN 152 • JEFFERSON PARK 194 • SOUTH CHICAGO 118 • BEVERLY 153 • KENWOOD 196 • SOUTH DEERING 119 • BRIDGEPORT 154 • LAKE VIEW 197 • SOUTH LAWNDALE 120 • BRIGHTON PARK 156 • LINCOLN PARK 199 • SOUTH SHORE 121 • BURNSIDE 158 • LINCOLN SQUARE 201 • UPTOWN 122 • CALUMET HEIGHTS 160 • LOGAN SQUARE 204 • WASHINGTON HEIGHTS 123 • CHATHAM 162 • LOOP 205 • WASHINGTON PARK 124 • CHICAGO LAWN 165 • LOWER WEST SIDE 206 • WEST ELSDON 125 • CLEARING 167 • MCKINLEY PARK 207 • WEST ENGLEWOOD 126 • DOUGLAS PARK 168 • MONTCLARE 208 • WEST GARFIELD PARK 128 • DUNNING 169 • MORGAN PARK 210 • WEST LAWN 129 • EAST GARFIELD PARK 170 • MOUNT GREENWOOD 211 • WEST PULLMAN 131 • EAST SIDE 171 • NEAR NORTH SIDE 212 • WEST RIDGE 132 • EDGEWATER 173 • NEAR SOUTH SIDE 214 • WEST TOWN 134 • EDISON PARK 174 • NEAR WEST SIDE 217 • WOODLAWN 135 • ENGLEWOOD 178 • NEW CITY 219 • SOURCE LIST 137 • FOREST GLEN 180 • NORTH CENTER 138 • FULLER PARK 181 • NORTH LAWNDALE DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY & SUPPORT SERVICES NEIGHBORHOOD RESOURCE DIRECTORY WELCOME (eU& ...TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD RESOURCE DIRECTORY! This Directory has been compiled by the Chicago Department of Family and Support Services and Chapin Hall to assist Chicago families in connecting to available resources in their communities. -
Tracking the Biden Agenda on Immigration Enforcement
SPECIAL REPORT TRACKING THE BIDEN AGENDA ON IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT by Jorge Loweree and Aaron Reichlin-Melnick About the American Immigration Council The American Immigration Council works to strengthen America by shaping how America thinks about and acts towards immigrants and immigration and by working toward a more fair and just immigration system that opens its doors to those in need of protection and unleashes the energy and skills that immigrants bring. Through its research and analysis, the American Immigration Council provides policymakers, the media, and the general public with information about how the immigration system works, the impact of policy proposals, and the crucial role that immigration plays in our communities and workplaces. Visit us at www.AmericanImmigrationCouncil.org and www.ImmigrationImpact.com. About the Authors Jorge Loweree is the Director of Policy at the American Immigration Council, where he directs the Council’s administrative and legislative advocacy and leads the Council’s efforts to provide lawmakers, policymakers, advocates, and the general public with accurate and timely information about the role of immigrants in the United States. Previously, Jorge spent ten years in a variety of positions with the U.S. House of Representatives, most recently as Senior Counsel for Immigration Law and Policy, working on a wide range of enforcement and benefits issues. Jorge holds a J.D. from the University of Colorado Law School and Bachelor of Arts in Mathematics from the Saint Mary’s University. Aaron Reichlin-Melnick is Policy Counsel at the American Immigration Council, where he works primarily on immigration court issues and the intersection of immigration law and policy. -
Stories in Mexico and the United States About the Border
STORIES IN MEXICO AND THE UNITED STATES ABOUT THE BORDER: THE RHETORIC AND THE REALITIES GLORIA VALENCIA-WEBER & ANTOINETTE SEDILLO LOPEZ* I. Introduction Immigration was a hot topic before the failure of the June 2007 United States (U.S.) President's Immigration Reform Bill1 and remains so today. 2 President Obama has promised to work on comprehensive immigration reform.3 This initiative will, of course, involve popular discourse and press coverage. During the time in which the 2007 Immigration Reform Bill was being considered, the media on both sides of the Mexico-U.S. border published numerous * Gloria Valencia-Weber, J.D. Harvard, founding Director of the Indian Law Certificate Program and Professor of Law, University of New Mexico; Antoinette Sedillo Lopez, J.D. UCLA, Professor of Law, University of New Mexico. The authors presented an early draft of this paper at the conference, Once Upon a Legal Time: Developing the Skills of Story Telling in Law, The City Law School, Inns of Court, London, July 19, 2007. The authors also appreciate the feedback from their colleagues at the University of New Mexico at a faculty colloquium. Special thanks to Norman Bay, Sherri Thomas, Ernesto Longa, Joey Montano, J.D. UNM 2008 and Honor Keeler, J.D. UNM J.D. expected 2010. 1 Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act, 5. 1348, 110th Cong. (2007); see, e.g., Stephen Dinan, Immigration Bill Quashed, Senators Swayed by Pressure From Public, WASH. TIMES, June 29, 2007, availableat WL 12315089. 2 See, e.g., Julia Preston, White House Plan on Immigration Includes Legal Status, N.Y. -
“Go After the Women”: Mothers Against Illegal Aliens' Campaign
“Go After the Women”: Mothers Against Illegal Aliens’ Campaign Against Mexican Immigrant Women and Their Children ∗ MARY ROMERO INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................1355 I. INTERSECTIONALITY AND MOTHERING DISCOURSES ..................................1363 A. Domesticity and Motherhood............................................................1363 B. Latina Immigrants and Domesticity..................................................1365 C. Race, Ethnicity, Class, Citizenship, and Unfit Mothers....................1367 II. CONSTRUCTING ANTI-IMMIGRANT CAMPAIGN AGAINST IMMIGRANT MOTHERS ...................................................................................................1370 A. Nativism and Mothering Discourse ..................................................1371 B. Establishing Economic and Security Threats ...................................1380 CONCLUSION........................................................................................................1388 INTRODUCTION “Protect Our Children, Secure Our Borders!” is the rallying cry adopted by Mothers Against Illegal Aliens (MAIA), an Arizona-based women’s anti-immigration group founded by Michelle Dallacroce in January 2006.1 Like other race-based nativist groups emerging in the United States, MAIA targets immigrants as the reason for overcrowded and low-achieving schools, increased crime, unemployment, poor access to affordable health care, and the overall drain on public benefits.2 As mounting -
Dual Nationality for Mexicans?
ARTICLES DUAL NATIONALITY FOR MEXICANS? A COMPARATIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE DUAL NATIONALITY PROPOSAL AND ITS EVENTUAL POLITICAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS JORGE A. VARGAS4 INTRODUCrION Recently, the government of Mexico has been pondering whether to amend its Constitution so its nationals will not be le- gally allowed to voluntarily abandon their nationality, even when they become naturalized citizens of another country. Contrary to the policy followed by Mexico since it became politically in- dependent in 1821,' pursuing this proposal would mean that the t Acting Professor of Law, University of San Diego School of Law. LL.B., summa cum laude, National Autonomous University of Mexico School of Law (UNAM); LL.M., Yale Law School, 1970; J.S.D. Candidate, Yale Law School, 1972. Former Professor of Law at UNAM, Iberoamericana, and Anahuac Law Schools in Mexico City, 1972-1978. Former member of the Mexico City Bar Association. The author acknowledges, with sincere gratitude, the research assistance pro- vided by USD law students Karen Ballesteros and Emily Goldbach, in the prepara- tion and design of the graphs and tables appearing in this article, respectively. This article would have not been written without the diligent and courteous assistance provided by Frank Weston, Reference Librarian at USD's Pardee Legal Research Center. The author verifies the accuracy of the Spanish language cites and all Eng- lish translations. 1. After ten years of war, the entering to Mexico City of the Army of the Three Guarantees led by Agustin de Iturbide on Sept. 27, 1821, symbolizes the con- summation of the Mexican independence. -
Citizenship and Belonging: the Construction of US Latino Identity Today
Rev25-01 1/3/07 13:11 Página 115 Suzanne Oboler* ➲ Citizenship and Belonging: The Construction of US Latino Identity Today Introduction “During times of war, the first casualty is Truth.” Those are the words written long ago by the famous British war correspondent, Phillip Knightly. Over the past few years, two Mexican American journalists, Patricia Gonzales and Roberto Rodríguez, have continuously exposed the hypocrisy, lies and dis- tortions that have penetrated what we could call the “common sense” knowledge that has thus far organized our everyday life in U.S. society. In their columns, they point out, for example, that in the name of patriotism, our civil liberties have been curtailed; that fear and distrust of fellow citizens have increasingly become the accepted norm. Mass round- ups of different national-origin groups have gone virtually unnoticed by anyone other than the groups directly involved. Racial profiling is now official government policy, and those who practice it are called our nation’s heroes and heroines. Indeed, the most recent example of these distortions is by Harvard Professor Samuel Huntington, in a new “domestic” version of his “clash of civilizations” argument. His argument in Who Are We: The Challenges to America’s National Identity (2004), was visibly discussed in various news outlets, including in The New York Times, which sum- marized it in the following terms: “In this new era [...] the single most immediate and most serious challenge to America’s traditional identity comes from the immense and continuing immigration from Latin America, especially Mexico. These new immigrants, [Huntington] argues, are not like earlier immigrants. -
Making Contributions to the Field Mission the Lloyd A
Lloyd A. Fry Foundation 2005 Annual Report Making Contributions to the Field Mission The Lloyd A. Fry Foundation supports organizations with the strength and commitment to address persistent problems of urban Chicago resulting from poverty, violence, ignorance, and despair. We seek to build the capacity of individuals and the systems that serve them. Our vision is a Chicago that offers education, prosperity, and hope for all. About the Foundation In 1933 Lloyd A. Fry founded the Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Company on the Southwest Side of Chicago. During the next five decades, the company grew to become the world’s largest manufacturer of asphalt roofing and allied products, with nearly 5,000 dedicated employees in manufacturing facilities nationwide. The company was sold to Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation in 1977. In large part, the proceeds from the sale of the company now serve as the endowment of the Lloyd A. Fry Foundation. The Foundation has been addressing the needs of the Chicago community since 1983. Table of Contents 2 Message from the Chairman 3 Message from the Executive Director 14 Grant Highlights 22 Urban Leadership Awards 24 High School Initiative 30 2005 Grants 36 Independent Auditor’s Report 42 Grantmaking Programs 43 Grant Application Procedures 44 Board of Directors and Staff Message from the Chairman Message from the Executive Director 2005 was a year of quiet change for the Fry Foundation. Our new executive director, Unmi Song, put her Fry Foundation grantees are among the most important institutions in Chicago. Reaching out to our indelible stamp on our grantmaking in a number of subtle (and a few not-so-subtle) ways. -
Immigration Enforcement Actions: 2019
Immigration Enforcement Actions: 2019 MIKE GUO SEPTEMBER 2020 INTRODUCTION • ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) engages in initiated 29 percent more intakes into immigration immigration enforcement actions to prevent unlawful detention, with detentions of aliens from Mexico entry into the United States and to apprehend and and the Northern Triangle of Central America repatriate aliens who have violated or failed to comply accounting for 82 percent of all detentions. with U.S. immigration laws. The primary responsibility • DHS performed 9.5 percent more removals in 2019 for the enforcement of immigration law within DHS than in 2018, with about 43 percent of removals rests with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and involving aliens who had a prior criminal U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). CBP conviction. primarily enforces immigration laws along the borders and at ports of entry (POEs) and ICE is responsible for ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS PROCESSES interior enforcement and most detention and removal operations. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Determinations of Inadmissibility (USCIS) adjudicates applications and petitions for All aliens seeking admission at a POE are subject to immigration and naturalization benefits. inspection. OFO officers conduct these inspections at designated POEs and at pre-clearance locations at The 2019 Immigration Enforcement Actions Annual Flow Report, certain foreign ports. Applicants for admission who are authored by the DHS Office of Immigration Statistics determined to be inadmissible may be permitted to (OIS), presents information on DHS immigration voluntarily withdraw their application for admission enforcement actions during 2019.1 This includes and return to their home country, processed for determinations of inadmissibility by CBP Office of expedited removal, referred to an immigration judge Field Operations (OFO) officers, apprehensions by CBP (IJ) for removal proceedings, processed for a visa U.S. -
2006-07 Annual Report
����������������������������� the chicago council on global affairs 1 The Chicago Council on Global Affairs, founded in 1922 as The Chicago Council on Foreign Relations, is a leading independent, nonpartisan organization committed to influencing the discourse on global issues through contributions to opinion and policy formation, leadership dialogue, and public learning. The Chicago Council brings the world to Chicago by hosting public programs and private events featuring world leaders and experts with diverse views on a wide range of global topics. Through task forces, conferences, studies, and leadership dialogue, the Council brings Chicago’s ideas and opinions to the world. 2 the chicago council on global affairs table of contents the chicago council on global affairs 3 Message from the Chairman The world has undergone On September 1, 2006, The Chicago Council on tremendous change since Foreign Relations became The Chicago Council on The Chicago Council was Global Affairs. The new name respects the Council’s founded in 1922, when heritage – a commitment to nonpartisanship and public nation-states dominated education – while it signals an understanding of the the international stage. changing world and reflects the Council’s increased Balance of power, national efforts to contribute to national and international security, statecraft, and discussions in a global era. diplomacy were foremost Changes at The Chicago Council are evident on on the agenda. many fronts – more and new programs, larger and more Lester Crown Today, our world diverse audiences, a step-up in the pace of task force is shaped increasingly by forces far beyond national reports and conferences, heightened visibility, increased capitals. -
Border Security and the Southwest Border: Background, Legislation, and Issues
Border Security and the Southwest Border: Background, Legislation, and Issues Lisa M. Seghetti, Coordinator Section Research Manager (name redacted) Analyst in Domestic Security (name redacted) Analyst in Domestic Security (name redacted) Specialist in Immigration Policy September 28, 2005 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov RL33106 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Border Security and the Southwest Border: Background, Legislation, and Issues Summary Border security has emerged as an area of public concern, particularly after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. Although recent public concerns pertaining to border security may be attributed to the threat of potential terrorists coming into the country, past concerns that centered around drug and human smuggling and the illegal entry of migrants remain important issues. As Congress passes legislation to enhance border security (e.g., P.L. 109-13) and the Administration puts into place procedures to tighten border enforcement, concerns over terrorists exploiting the porous southwest border continue to grow. The U.S. border with Mexico is some 2,000 miles long, with more than 800,000 people arriving from Mexico daily and more than 4 million commercial crossings annually. The United States and Mexico are linked together in various ways, including through trade, investment, migration, tourism, environment, and familial relationships. Mexico is the second most important trading partner of the United States and this trade is critical to many U.S. industries and border communities. In an effort to facilitate the legitimate flow of travel and trade, the governments of the United States and Mexico signed the U.S.-Mexico Border Partnership agreement. -
Undocumented Women and Social Media Jillian Báez
VOICING CITIZENSHIP: Undocumented Women and Social Media Jillian Báez Abstract: This essay explores how voice is mediated by social media through case studies of two highly visible undocumented women in the immigrant rights movement. Through a rhetorical analysis of the Facebook pages and blogs of the case studies, the essay documents the possibilities and constraints of deploying marginalized voices on social media. Ultimately, I argue that social media, as interactive and accessible platforms, enable these women to voice claims to citizenship in more nuanced and unconventional ways than in traditional media outlets. In particular, social media make it possible for these women to use multiple, and sometimes contradictory, voices that challenge conventional notions of citizenship and function as an addendum to more limited messages in traditional media outlets and demonstrations. Key Words: immigration, social media, citizenship, voice, undocumented women, activism Immigration continues to generate heated debates in US politics and mass media. On the one hand, there is an anti-immigration rhetoric present that is particularly aimed at the undocumented and continuously present in mainstream media and politics. At the same time, there are activists challenging dominant discourses that construct immigrants as both physical and symbolic threats to the nation. These counter-narratives are especially present in social media where immigrants and their supporters organize for comprehensive immigration reform and a moratorium on deportations (an estimated 1,100 people are deported each day under the Obama administration [Nakamura 2013]). While the immigrant rights movement utilizes traditional forms of protest such as rallies, boycotts, and marches, it is also increasingly present online in social media (Costanza-Chock 2008, 2014; Hondagneu-Sotelo and Salas 56 CHICANA/LATINA STUDIES 16:1 FALL 2016 CHICANA/LATINA STUDIES 16:1 FALL 2016 57 VOICING CITIZENSHIP 2008; Voss and Bloemraad 2011). -
Cuc Vu, Director
Cuc Vu, Director July 3, 2019 Submitted via email OMB USCIS Desk Officer [email protected] Re: Agency USCIS, OMB Control Number 1615-0116 - Public Comment Opposing Changes to Fee Waiver Eligibility Criteria, Agency Information Collection Activities: Revision of a Currently Approved Collection: Request for Fee Waiver FR Doc. 2019-11744, Filed 6-5-19; 84 FR 26137 Dear Desk Officer: The City of Seattle (“the City”) submits this comment in response to the proposed revision of a currently approved collection published by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) in their Agency Information Collection Notice published on June 5, 2019. We are responding to the lack of response to the public comments previously submitted on April 5, 2019 and to address the inadequacy of responses by USCIS to comments submitted in response to their Notice of Revision of Currently Approved Collection published on September 28, 2018. The City of Seattle continues to strongly oppose the proposed rule to modify Form I-912, Request for Fee Waiver. The City of Seattle created the Office of Immigrant and Refugee Affairs (OIRA) in 2012 to improve the lives of Seattle’s immigrant and refugee families. Through OIRA, the City of Seattle funds and coordinates two naturalization programs called the New Citizen Campaign (NCC) and the New Citizen Program (NCP) to help an estimated 75,000 Seattle-area legal permanent residents (“LPR”) become U.S. citizens. Since its inception in 1997, NCP has served over 19,000 people, provided naturalization assistance to over 12,300 LPRs, successfully naturalized 9,500 LPRs, and provided over 90,000 hours of citizenship instruction.