DOCSLIB.ORG

Stavins Article in Outreach Can

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stavins Article in Outreach Can COP16 • DAY 1 CANCUN, MEXICO • NOVEMBER 29th, 2010 OUTREACH a multi-stakeholderOUTREACH magazine on environment and sustainable development. KNOWINGKNOWING HIGHHIGH NOONNOON SUCCESSSUCCESS IFIF ININ CANCUN:CANCUN: CANCAN WEWE STILLSTILL MAKEMAKE YOUYOU SEESEE ITIT PROGRESSPROGRESS ININ THETHE ROBERTROBERT N.N. STAVINSSTAVINS UNFCCC?UNFCCC? A HISTORIC WHICHWHICH WAYWAY CONSENSUS AT FORFOR CANCUN?CANCUN? THE NAGOYA BIODIVERSITY FROMFROM THETHE COPENHAGENCOPENHAGEN DISCORDDISCORD TOTO THETHE SUMMIT COCHABAMBACOCHABAMBA ACCORDACCORD Knowing Success if You See It Robert Stavins John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University By: Christie Kneteman, Islands First PHOTO: Shutterstock.com The key challenge of the climate negotiations in Cancun -- the Sixteenth Conference of the Parties (COP-16) of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) – is to continue the process of constructing a sound foundation for meaningful, long-term global action. ome of the gloom-and-doom Second, the cost-effective path for notion of immediate “success.” predictions made about these stabilizing concentrations involves a Snegotiations are misleading, because gradual ramp-up in target severity, to Major Long-Term Achievements they are based upon unreasonable – and avoid rendering large parts of the capital are Needed, Not Minor Short- fundamentally inappropriate – expectations stock prematurely obsolete. (despite the fact that expectations have Term Gains been lowered dramatically since COP-15 Third, massive technological change in Copenhagen last year). is the key to the needed transition from It might be relatively easy, but actually quite reliance on carbon-intensive fossil fuels unfortunate, for countries to achieve what some people might define as “success” in Keeping Your Eyes on the Prize to more climate-friendly energy sources. Long-term price signals (most likely from Cancun: a signed international agreement, followed by glowing press releases. I say Why do I say that the best goal for the government policies) will be needed to it would be unfortunate, because such Cancun climate talks is to make real inspire such technological change. an agreement could only be the Kyoto progress on a sound foundation for Protocol on steroids: more stringent meaningful, long-term global action, not Fourth and finally, the creation of long- targets for the original list of industrialized some notion of immediate triumph? This lasting international institutions is central countries (Annex I) and no meaningful is because of some basic scientific and to addressing this global challenge. commitments by the key rapidly-growing economic realities. This is not to suggest that there should be emerging economies, such as China, India, Brazil, Korea, Mexico, and South the focus of scientists is (and the anything other than a sense of urgency First, Africa. focus of policy makers should be) on brought to these efforts to address the stabilizing concentrations of greenhouse threat of climate change. But for all of Such an agreement could — in principle — gases in the atmosphere at acceptable the reasons above, international climate be signed, but it would not reduce global levels by the year 2050 and beyond, negotiations will be an ongoing process, emissions, and it would not be ratified by because it is the accumulated stock of not a single task with a clear end-point. the U.S. Senate (just like Kyoto). Hence, greenhouse gas emissions — not the flow So, the bottom-line is that a sensible there would be no real progress on climate of emissions in any year — that are linked goal for the international negotiations in change. with climate consequences. Cancun is progress on a sound foundation for meaningful long-term action, not some 1 What Will Real Progress in Protocol between Annex I and non-Annex Cancun Look Like? I countries. (Note that more than 50 non- Annex I countries have greater per capita income than the poorest of the Annex I If it is not reasonable to expect that ROBERT N. STAVINS a comprehensive post-Kyoto policy countries.) architecture will be identified and enacted Robert N. Stavins is the Albert Pratt in Cancun, what will constitute real The UNFCCC principle of “common Professor of Business and Government progress? but differentiated responsibilities” could be made meaningful through the dual at the Harvard Kennedy School, Director principles that: all countries recognize their of the Harvard Environmental Economics 1.Embracing Parallel Processes historic emissions (read, the industrialized Program, Faculty Chairman of Doctoral world); and all countries are responsible Programs, Co Chair of the Harvard A significant step forward would be for for their future emissions (think of those Business School Kennedy School Joint the UNFCCC to embrace the parallel rapidly-growing emerging economies). Degree Programs, and Director of the processes that are carrying out multilateral Harvard Project on Climate Agreements. discussions (and in some cases, This would represent a great leap beyond He is a University Fellow of Resources for negotiations) on climate change policy: what has become the “QWERTY keyboard” the Future, a Research Associate of the the Major Economies Forum or MEF (a (that is, unproductive path dependence) of National Bureau of Economic Research, multilateral venue for discussions – but international climate policy: the distinction Co-Editor of the Review of Environmental not negotiations – outside of the UNFCCC, in the Kyoto Protocol between the small Economics and Policy, and a member of initiated by the United States); the G20 set of Annex I countries with quantitative the Board of Directors of Resources for (periodic meetings of the finance ministers targets, and the majority of countries in the Future, the Scientific Advisory Board – and sometimes heads of government the world with no responsibilities. Various of the Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, and – of the twenty largest economies in the policy architectures could subsequently editorial boards of numerous academic world); and various other multilateral and build on these dual principles and make journals. bilateral organizations and discussions. them operational, beginning to bridge the massive political divide which exists The most sensible goal for Cancun is progress on a sound foundation for meaningful long-term action, not some notion of immediate triumph. The previous leadership of the UNFCCC between the industrialized and the seemed to view the MEF, the G20, developing world. and most other non-UNFCCC forums as competition – indeed, as a threat. At the Harvard Project on Climate Fortunately, the UNFCCC’s new leadership Agreements — a multi-national initiative under Executive Secretary Christiana with some 35 research projects in Figueres has displayed a considerably Australia, China, Europe, India, Japan, more positive and pragmatic attitude and the United States — we have toward these parallel processes. developed a variety of architectural proposals that could make these dual 2. Consolidating Negotiations principles operational. (See, for example: Tracks “Global Climate Policy Architecture and Political Feasibility: Specific Formulas and There are three major and somewhat Emission Targets to Attain 460 PPM CO2 parallel processes operative: first, the Concentrations” by Valentina Bosetti and UNFCCC’s KP track (negotiating national Jeffrey Frankel; and “Three Key Elements targets for a possible second commitment of Post-2012 International Climate Policy The Bottom Line period – post-2012 – for the Kyoto Architecture” by Sheila M. Olmstead and Protocol); second, the LCA track (the Robert N. Stavins.) It is important to bring to the Cancun UNFCCC’s negotiation track for Long- discussions sensible expectations and term Cooperative Action); and third, the 3. Productive Steps in Narrow, effective plans. Negotiations in this Copenhagen Accord, negotiated and domain will be an ongoing process, not Focused Agreements, such as a single task with a clear end-point. The noted at COP-15 in Copenhagen last year. REDD+ Consolidating these three tracks into two most sensible goal for Cancun is progress tracks (or better yet, one track) would be on a sound foundation for meaningful long- another significant step forward. A third area of success at the Cancun term action, not some notion of immediate negotiations could be realized by some triumph. The key question is not what One way this could happen would be for productive steps with specific, narrow Cancun accomplishes in the short-term, the LCA negotiations to take as their point agreements, such as on REDD+ (Reduced but whether it helps put the world in a of departure the existing Copenhagen Deforestation and Forest Degradation, better position five, ten, and twenty years Accord, which itself marked an important plus enhancement of forest carbon from now in regard to an effective long- step forward by blurring for the first time stocks). Other areas where talks are term path of action to address the threat (although not eliminating) the unproductive moving forward, although somewhat more of global climate change. Whether it does and utterly obsolete distinction in the Kyoto slowly, are finance and technology. that remains to be seen. • 2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Climate Change and Pacific Island Countries
    Empowered lives. Resilient nations. Climate Change and Pacic Island Countries Background Papers Series 2012/07 Asia-Pacific Human Development Report Background Papers Series 2012/07 Climate Change and Pacific Island Countries Patrick D. Nunn For more than 25 years, Patrick Nunn worked at the University of the South Pacific and is currently at the University of New England. He has authored more than 200 publications including five books. In 2003 he was awarded the Gregory Medal of the Pacific Science Association and in 2007 shared the Nobel Peace Prize awarded to the IPCC. Email: [email protected] Abstract Since being first settled by humans more than 3000 years ago, the Pacific Islands region has experienced innumerable changes in climate that have affected livelihoods, something that underlines the sensitivity of such comparatively small and resource-constrained landmasses to extraneous change but also helps explain why their inhabitants developed resilience strategies that remain important today. During the past 100 years, the region has been affected by increased temperatures and sea- level rise, together with other climate-linked changes including variability in ENSO periodicity and tropical-cyclone frequency. Owing to the increasing pace of globalisation in the region during the same period, together with growing populations and demands on island resources, it is difficult to isolate changes ascribable to climate change; some of the clearest of these are the increases in coral bleaching, incidences of coastal flooding and shoreline erosion. Despite knowledge about the causes and effects of climate-related environmental (and related) changes in the region, supported by considerable financial aid and other external assistance, the awareness of most Pacific people about climate change and the extent of community buy-in to appropriate adaptation agendas have been negligible.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change As Opportunity*
    the author(s) 2012 articles ISSN 1473-2866 ephemera www.ephemeraweb.org theory & politics in organization volume 12(1/2): 113-137 The prey of uncertainty: Climate change as opportunity* Jerome Whitington abstract In this article I describe the post-Copenhagen moment in carbon markets and climate politics as one characterised by deep uncertainty. Uncertainty describes the social experience of emerging climate policy, but it is also business strategy. Uncertainty is necessary for markets to function. To understand this, I look toward practices of capitalism, which produce the future as indeterminate. Uncertainty is generated by business practices of treating conventions – rules and institutions, but also social conventions such as people’s ‘green’ expectations – in terms of their material opportunities. Treating conventions as always open to negotiation requires an ambitious or speculative ethos. Rather than projecting a stable vision of reality, nature or truth, these practitioners constantly ask, what can we do with these possibilities? I project that the near future will involve a proliferation of low-value, nontransparent carbon markets without any binding global cap on emissions. Introduction The establishment of global carbon markets by regulatory fiat would mark the triumph of financial hegemony over the politics of climate change risk. Climate finance practitioners have first multiplied in numbers in the speculative lead-up to Copenhagen’s COP15 and then spectacularly retreated to the wings to wait again for the signs of easy short-term profit, an ebb and flow marking new high tide for what Christian Marazzi (2010) has called the ‘violence of financial capitalism’. Even so, the theme for 2010 was how carbon markets might still be a basis for accumulation in the absence of a global market organised around a comprehensive UN agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • How Island States Can Maintain Statehood in the Face of Disappearing Territory
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Michigan State University College of Law: Digital Commons THE GLOBAL “DISAPPEARING ACT”: HOW ISLAND STATES CAN MAINTAIN STATEHOOD IN THE FACE OF DISAPPEARING TERRITORY Jacquelynn Kittel* 2014 MICH.ST.L.REV.1207 ABSTRACT There are currently several island states that will cease to exist in a few decades. Due to climate change and rising sea levels, these islands will soon become uninhabitable and eventually disappear, leaving island populations without a home country. There have been several proposed solutions—including sea defenses, artificial islands, and governments-in-exile—though none have proved sufficient in addressing this problem, and the question of their continued statehood remains unresolved. International law does not adequately address this problem, and it needs to develop in a way that not only ensures the continued existence of these states, but also addresses the actions of other states that contribute to climate change in an attempt to slow or stop this process. Much of the existing legal scholarship on disappearing islands tackles the problem of climate migrants by suggesting changes to international refugee law, which does not solve the problem of statehood. Nonetheless, the legal scholarship that does address statehood rarely tackles the underlying cause of the problem—climate change. This Article recommends a hybrid treaty that allows for the continued existence of these states through a modified state-in-exile. The proposed treaty simultaneously encourages states to lower their greenhouse gas emissions by requiring the worst offenders of climate change to become host countries for displaced island people.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Island Developing Countries in Climate Negotiations
    1 2 Small Island Developing Countries in Climate Negotiations Position and Strategies to influence the 2009 Copenhagen Summit Inés de Águeda Corneloup May 2011 Master Thesis MSc Environmental Sciences Supervisor Prof. dr. ir. Arthur Mol Environmental Policy Group (ENP) Wageningen University and Research Center (WUR) 3 4 Abstract Despite being at the frontline of climate change, Small Islands Developing States (SIDS) remain powerless actors in the global political arena. This thesis explores the strategic influence of SIDS in climate negotiations, concretely at the Copenhagen summit in December 2009. Based on the analysis of the content of primary and secondary sources, and on three in-depth interviews, this study make use of several theoretical concepts – dimensions of leadership, discourse-coalition and discourse hegemony- to identify initiatives of SIDS to impact the bargaining process and the final outcome. The three main demands of small island countries at the summit compose the focus of this study: a temperature rise limit of 1.5ºC above pre-industrial levels, funding for adaptation, and a legally-binding outcome. Results reveal that SIDS did put into practice strategies of entrepreneurial, intellectual and environmental leadership, although those only succeeded to a limited extend. SIDS managed to hold a defined position in the climate debate, and eventually secured some small points in the final Copenhagen Accord. However, the lack of structural power inevitably harmed SIDS‘ efforts, and as a consequence, major significant influence was not achieved in the negotiations of Copenhagen. 5 6 Acknowledgements One year ago, I was actually starting another thesis research. I was trying to go to my beloved Bhutan, and to work on a totally different topic.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010: Volume XVII
    9 E 0 L H R 0 O O W T 2 H – E C S 8 E E 0 T I A N 0 U D 2 , 2009–2010 A V , Y R I T G I G V S E R E R E C X XVII I E N A V V I G e R N A E R U S m W . K C F I u R l L W T O B R o Y U E V Volume Volume P B W F E O N R O : H A : N T N N E E C U I N L R P S S O V RAN R I NAVIGATING THE ECONOMIC DOWNTURN: HIP ATIN ATIN A O I I I U S F HOW NONPROFITS AND FOUNDATIONS I L E NG U N S FRI E H N T T T E E W CAN WORK TOGETHER T O S O C P U W A A : S D A E L O T H C C A T N A AL, R THE I I IN R E T S MICRONUTRIENT INTERVENTIONS TO R S R L S O C E N S N R D Y AND THE AND Y T S TRATION EFORM C U S D A S O ADDRESS THE WORLD’S CHRONIC HEALTH N W A N Y E I A : N D E TH S A C A U S L R N TION AND HUNGER CRISIS N I M E N : O D N P U O E R N N , L U G EX D E E A U E O V EADER WAGNER A O L CHANGING THE LEGACY OF JUVENILE E O S OOL O L D W D ? TRONI O S R I O M L ARRIAGE ARRIAGE L P O I W N S G OLI JUSTICE IN NEW YORK STATE I U L T T S IGHT U TRIANIZING A C T N H U O E I H J R T T LE OF OF LE B C B C E FOR P O TIT E U O B M N TION FOR M R A C N I S T R R N U D S R G F H E N T C S R REVIEW N: S Y SPATIAL SPATIAL E O LE DMINI AND E A E O R U N A WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE SECTION L O IPATORY IPATORY G L E N, SO N, O I RU E A ROMOTE CHANGE ROMOTE A M R N Y Y C U E S R O F A , S E OVEMENT OVEMENT E R I W A H S U C L M C T T O AY, AY, P V C ORK: URBAN ORK: URBAN W B A RACE TO THE BOTTOM: INDULGENT USE H P O RO A EALTH AND EALTH NITY NITY W W O EDE S E V E S : O EER Y C A A n’ D S D M : AND SCARCITY OF WATER RESOURCES IN O S I ’ E G R C H P : T P R T H U N W R Y H E T O PPORT PPORT N D C P U THE AMERICAN SOUTHWEST C T I R OF OF E E N E N V H D K W E I E A T T RAINING TO TO RAINING H T G M NFORMAL SETTLEMENT SETTLEMENT NFORMAL E U I S S G U H O A I N S E C T A S I IGHT NEW YORK UNIVERSITY I T S ARTI L IDTO U D OME A OREIGN T T R O C D CLIMATE CHANGE AND WATER A SOL A I O T N N E U T R L O C T I E W ROVIDING ROVIDING T E L R A F G P A U ROBERT F.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Impacts in Hawai'i
    CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS IN HAWAI‘I A summary of climate change and its impacts to Hawai‘i’s ecosystems and communities 2014 ™ “Intelligence is the ability to adapt to change.” -Stephen Hawking- Image: Coastal taro fields, Hanalei, Kaua‘i. Source: Dolan Eversole. "Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, and since the 1950s, many of the observed changes are unprecedented over decades to millennia. The atmosphere and ocean have warmed, the amounts of snow and ice have diminished, sea level has risen, and the concentrations of greenhouse gases have increased." Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2013 University of Hawai‘i at Mänoa Sea Grant College Program. June 2014 Climate Change Impacts in Hawai‘i - A summary of climate change and its impacts to Hawai‘i’s ecosystems and communities. UNIHI-SEAGRANT-TT-12-04 Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ii I. INTRODUCTION 1 Climate Change and Hawai‘i's Residents 1 What is Climate Change? 2 What are Greenhouse Gasses (GHG)? 2 Principal Impacts of Climate Change in Hawai‘i 4 The Precautionary Principle and 'No Regrets' Aproaches 5 Adaptation, Mitigation, and Response 6 II. BACKGROUND: CLIMATE RESEARCH AND SYNTHESIS 7 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 7 Pacific Island Regional Climate Assessment 9 III. CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS TO HAWAI‘I’S ECOSYSTEMS 10 1. Marine Ecosystems 12 A. OPEN OCEAN 12 B. CORAL REEFS AND OTHER NEARSHORE HABITATS 14 2. Coasts and the Built Environment 16 3. Terrestrial Ecosystems 21 4. Freshwater Resources 23 5. Human Health 25 IV. NEXT STEPS FOR CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION IN HAWAI‘I 27 APPENDIX A: HAWAI‘I CLIMATE ADAPTATION POLICY 28 APPENDIX B: ADDITIONAL RESOURCES 29 REFERENCES 30 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document was produced by the University of Hawai'i Sea Grant College Program (UH Sea Grant).
    [Show full text]
  • Maldives: Post Tsunami Environmental Assessment
    MALDIVES Post-Tsunami Environmental Assessment United Nations Environment Programme MALDIVES Post-Tsunami Environmental Assessment United Nations Environment Programme CONTENTS Foreword 4 Introduction 6 Findings & conclusions 12 Geologic setting and tsunami characteristics 14 Impacts on the natural environment 17 Impacts on the human environment 32 Economy & livelihoods 48 Environmental management capacity 60 Recommendations 74 Rehabilitating natural resources 76 Rehabilitating the human environment 78 Livelihoods recovery 84 Strengthening environmental capacities Annex I. UNEP field mission, 21-27 February 2005 91 Annex II. Soil and groundwater sampling results 93 References 96 Acknowledgements 98 Contributors 99 Acronyms 100 Indian Ocean tsunami reaching Male’ a 2 at approximately 9:20 a.m. on 26 December 2004, approximately three hours after tremors were felt. Credit: L. Hiller 3 FOREWORD by Klaus Töpfer United Nations Under-Secretary General Executive Director of the United Nations Environment Programme Credit: UNEP In the immediate aftermath of the enormous devastation and suffering caused by the 26 December 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami, UNEP established the Asian Tsunami Disaster Task Force. At the request of the governments of affected countries, the Task Force has assessed tsunami-related environmental damage, worked to ensure that environment is a part of national recovery agendas, and mobilised environmental recovery assistance. In February 2005, UNEP issued a rapid environmental assessment of seven of the tsunami-impacted countries (see http://www.unep.org/tsunami/tsunami_rpt.asp). This report, which was developed in close cooperation with the Ministry of Environment & Construction and with the generous support of the UK’s Department for International Development and the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), elaborates the findings of the rapid 4 assessment in the Republic of Maldives, based on a detailed expert investigation of the tsunami’s environmental impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress at the UN? | 1
    Progress at the UN? | 1 The annual Conference of Parties of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change opened this week in Lima, Peru, drawing delegates from around the world, including a few from UCLA Law. I am in Lima along with Legal Planet blogger Jesse Lueders and three students from our UCLA Environmental Law Clinic, Sarah Kozal ’16, Jacob Cohen ’15, and Sunny Tsou ’15. We are here with clinic client Islands First, a nonprofit that provides support to small island developing states, or SIDS. SIDS often have tremendous exposure to the impacts of greenhouse gas emissions, such as sea level rise and ocean acidification; some of these low-lying countries face the very real prospect of forced relocation if sea level rise is not controlled. At the same time, SIDS bear the least responsibility for the creation of the problem and face significant constraints on the resources they can bring to these international talks. Islands First provides these countries with additional capacity and legal support in multilateral environmental negotiations, helping them to work toward strong outcomes. The aims of the Lima COP are diverse and a lot is at stake here. Parties are sorting through details of the (shrinking) obligations under the Kyoto Protocol’s second commitment period. Parties are also developing the contours of a new post-Kyoto Protocol agreement, to be signed in Paris at next year’s COP and to take effect in 2020. And, recognizing the need for urgent action even before 2020, parties are working to hasten and enhance action on mitigation, adaptation, finance, capacity building, and other pressing issues between now and 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report Palau Integrated Marine Protected Area Model
    Palau Integrated Marine Protected Area Model The Final Report of The Project for Exploratory Research on Models of a Micronesian Marine Protected Area FY 2010-2011 The Sasakawa Peace Foundation The Sasakawa Pacific Island Nations Fund CopyrightⒸ 2013 by The Sasakawa Peace Foundation All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without the permission of the publisher, except for the purpose of a review written for inclusion in a magazine, newspaper, broadcast or online service. The Sasakawa Pacific Island Nations Fund, The Sasakawa Peace Foundation The Nippon FoundationBldg., 4th Fl. 1-2-2, Akasaka, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan Phone: +81-3-6229-5450 Fax: +81-3-6229-5473 URL: http://www.spf.org/spinf/ Edited by Chihiro Sato, Administrative Staff, SPINF Junichi Koyanagi, Program officer, SPINF Supported by Yuriko Hasegawa, Assistant Manager, SPINF Printed at Tobi Co.,Ltd., Tokyo, Japan Contents Foreword The Micronesia Marine Environment Committee Members Glossary Chapter 1 Project Overview ··············································································································································· 1 1.1 Background and Objectives ·························································································································· 1 1.2 Scope and Content of Project Implementation ··························································································· 2 1.2.1 Establishment of the Micronesia Marine Environment
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Pacific Early Childhood Development (ECD) Forum Implementing Pasifika Call to Action on ECD 23-25 October 2019 Sheraton Hotel, Nadi, Fiji
    2019 Pacific Early Childhood Development (ECD) Forum Implementing Pasifika Call to Action on ECD 23-25 October 2019 Sheraton Hotel, Nadi, Fiji CONTENTS Acronyms 1 Introduction 2 2019 ECD Forum Outcomes Statement 3 Forum Highlights: Day 1 (Wednesday, 23 October 2019) 8 Opening ceremony 6 Welcome Remarks by UNICEF 6 Remarks by Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat 8 Remarks by New Zealand Government 11 Opening Remarks by Fiji Government 13 Keynote address: Prioritizing a Holistic Agenda for Young Children by Honourable Dr. Teuea Toatu, Vice-President of Kiribati 17 Remarks by the World Bank 23 Plenary session: Realising a Holistic Agenda for Children: Policies and Systems that Support a Whole-of-government Approach to ECD 24 Officials Forum: Final deliberation on draft Terms of Reference of the Pacific Regional Council for ECD (PRC4ECD) 25 Ministerial Roundtable: Endorsement of Terms of Reference (ToR) of the Pacific Regional Council for ECD (PRC4ECD) 26 Concurrent session: Family Friendly Policies Panel 29 Plenary: Announcement of Ministerial Decision on Terms of Reference for the Pacific Regional Council for Early Childhood Development (PRC4ECD) 33 Plenary: The Triple Burden of Malnutrition in the Pacific 34 Burden #1 Stunting 34 Burden #2 Micronutrient deficiency – Hidden Hunger 35 Burden #3 Maternal and Childhood Obesity 36 Common Solutions 37 Plenary Address: Promoting Healthy Eating in Pacific Homes 38 Forum Highlights: Day 2 (Thursday, 24 October 2019) 39 Special Message by Government of Tonga, “ECD Investments in the Pacific” 40 Plenary:
    [Show full text]
  • Hawaii and CC Navigating Change
    Navigating Change HAWAI‘I’S APPROACH TO ADAPTATION Report for the First Meeting of State, Local and Tribal Leaders Task Force on Climate Preparedness and Resilience December 10, 2013 Source photo Polynesian Voyaging Society Executive Summary his report describes Hawai‘i’s Vulnerability Change Adaptation Priority Guidelines into and Vantage Point law for multi-sector resilience n Hawai‘i hosts several research institutions the State of As the most geographically isolated islands and regional collaborations around climate on Earth, Hawai‘i is especially vulnerable to Hawai‘i’s unique change the impacts of climate change: T n position and perspective Freshwater. Hawai‘i is 100% dependent on rainfall for our very survival. Rainfall and Hawai‘i’s Top as a member of President stream flows are declining. Recommendations: n Coastlines. Hawai‘i’s shorelines (more An Opportunity to Strengthen Obama’s State, Local and than 750 miles) are its natural borders, but Resilience with Federal Partners they are vulnerable to beach erosion and sea Tribal Leaders Task Force 1. Provide actionable information level rise. for local decision-making and the on Climate Preparedness n Ocean Resources. Pacific Islanders island context are ocean peoples. Rising temperatures and n First Step: Support Task Force members’ and Resilience. Hawai‘i’s acidification kill the reefs, damage fisheries engagement of local stakeholders to develop and jeopardize the island way of life. specific recommendations and expedite team of state, federal, n Security. Climate change is a matter the development and delivery of priority of security for Hawai‘i. Climate change technical assistance and academic partners will disrupt and then threaten economic systems--food, water, energy, biodiversity, 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Cook Islands Country Evaluation
    JOINT EVALUATION OF THE PARIS DECLARATION PHASE 2 COOK ISLANDS COUNTRY EVALUATION December 2010 Credits We would like to express our thanks to the contributors to the design of the cover. The photo was taken by Harvie Allison. The designs were developed by Antonio Tungane Manuel. The design incorporates values embodied in the principles of development: • Tikitikitangata –represents people holding hands as a symbol of unity. • Kota’a – frigate bird – collectively linked together represent travel so for our purposes the journey of development. • The shape of the ngaru (wave) represents strength and also peace. In addition photographs as part of the document have been supplied by Health Specialists Ltd or the Aid Management Division. ii Paris Declaration Principles The Paris Declaration was formally agreed to by 91 countries which attended the Paris High level Forum in 2005. The declaration was signed on the 2nd March 2005. The following are the Paris Declaration Principles: Ownership Developing countries set their own strategies for development, improve their institutions and tackle corruption. Alignment Donor Countries bring their support in line with these objectives and use local systems. Harmonisation Donor countries co‐ordinate their action, simplify procedures and share information to avoid duplication. Managing for Results Developing countries and donors focus on producing – and measuring – results. Mutual Accountability Donor and developing country partners are accountable for development results. * * * * * * * * * Cook Islands Maori Translation: Te tango e rima no te akatere anga i te tuanga tauturu: Mouanga mai Ko te au enua katoatoa e kimi ia nei te puapinga, na ratou raie tuku i ta ratou ture no tei reira akapuapinga anga, pera katoa no te akameitaki anga atu i te au taokotai’anga no tei reira auangaanga ma te kimi ravenga I te takore atu i te au kino.
    [Show full text]