10 NTRO( NUMBE It

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

10 NTRO( NUMBE It AGENCY V011 INTERNATIONAL DEVELOIMENT FOR AID USE ONLY WAIIHINGTON, D. C. 20523 BIBLIOGRAPHIC INPUT SHEET 3.ATH(SSI- A.RSCrN )ARY FICATION Fisheries 2. TITLE STITLEAN E AND Improving food and nutrition through aquaculture in the developing countries 3. AUTHOR(S) Caton,Douglas; Moss,D.D.; Urano,J.A. 4. DOCUMENT DATE 5." NUMBER OF PAGES 6. ARC NUMBER 1974 : =58p. ARC 7. REFERENCE ORGANIZA IOIN NAME AND ADDRESS AID/TA,/AGR 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES (Sponsoring Origanization, Publishers, Availability) 9. ABSTRAC Aquaculture, the production of freshwater and now marine organisms through husbandry, contributes less than 10% of the water-derived if the best proteins in the world. However, existing methods were applied more widely, times as aquaculture could produce ten much protein annually by the year 2000. fishculture The total area presently used for is estimated to be four million to hectares. This area could be expanded about 30 million hectares. With improved methods, this would increase production from the present five million metric tons to 50 million tons by the end century. Ongoing research needs of the to be reinforced by coordinated planning financial assistance. This paper and describes selected aquacultures, including of the Chinese carp, common carp, Indian those pangasius, carp, tilapia, trout and salmon, catfish, walking catfish, milkfish, molluscs, shrimp, and eels, and discusses the most effective way to reinforce present LDG's research efforts. Research relating should concentrate on important scientific to of species: problems concerning a small number carps. catfish, tilapia, milkfish, mullets, priority research and shrimps. The highest i.salso needed on disei'es and the broad problems related spectrum of water quality to the cultured animal and its aquatic regional research environment. One or more centers should be established to conduct required, offer short-term the long-term research training for scientific personnel of and disseminate research national institutiuns, findings. A network of national centers established to investigate should also be local problems and conduct pilot studies. 10. CONTROL NUMBER 10 NTRO( NUMBE It. PRICE OF DOCUMENT . DESCRIPTORS 13. PROJECT NUMBER Aquaculture Food supply AERPjNUMBER 15. TYPE OF DOCUMENT AID 590.1 14-74) DRAFT: 3/5/74 Office of Agriculture Technical Assistance Bureau Improving Food and Nutrition Through Aquaculture in the Developing Countries by Douglas D. Caton, Donovan D. Moss and James A. Urano I. A. Problem: Economic development of food supplies needi to be sharply accelerated because: 1. Per capita food supplies are not keeping pace with income and population growth, and the need for stocks 2. The world protein gap is between 60 and 80 percent and increasing 3. The economical land base is decreasing under urbanization, cost and population pressures requiring: a. intensification of output yields per land unit b. diversification of crop and animal production c. multiple cropping using same soil and water resources B. Hypotheses 1. Aquaculture is an economical source of protein and vitamins 2. Aquaculture meets the criterion of bio-physical resource intensification 3. Aquaculture provides value added products to multiple land and water uses 4. Aquaculture helps utilize all the food niches in the water environment -2- I. Role of Aquaculture Presently Aquaculture, the production of freshwater and marine organisms through husbandry, contributes less than 10 percent of the world's water-derived proteins, with a production of 5-6 million metric tons (MT)valued at more than 2,500 million U.S. dollars annually. However, this is double the production of fice years ago, and an equally high rate of aquacultural growth could be sustained for a long period if the best existing production methods were applied more widely, and if necessary improvements were effected. By the year 2000, aquaculture could produce at least 50 MMT (millions metric TONS) of animal protein, representing an annual return of 25,000 million dollars at present proces. Its importance in the nutrition of certain countries, expecially land-locked ones, is greater than the magnitude of production suggests. Furthermore, aquaculture represents an ecologically sound practice and a use of solar energy that would otherwise be wasted. The increasing impact of the industry in developing countries and the recent results of development programs clearly shows its role in integrated rural development. The supply of one third of the world's animal protein (exclusive of milk) is dependent upon fisheries. Ninety percent or more of fish are captured from wild stocks,for which no yield increase comparable to that of aquaculture is regarded as possible within the same time span. Many of the most valuable stocks are already fully exploited or overfished, and relatively few new stocks are open td exploitation. -3- Capture fisheries did increase by 25 percent in the last five years, but this increase was largely through industiial fish landings, and levelled off to less than two percent during the last two years despite large injections of capital and of new technologies. III. The Present Status of Aquaculture A. Background The present contribution to world protein supplies by aquaculture is estimated between 5-6 million metric tons (MMT) of fish, equivalent to 10 percent of the total annual world fish catch utilized directly for human consumption(1 ). The potential for increased production of protein by aquaculture is large, with a ten-fold increase judged to be realistic in the immediate future through application of present technology. The total area presently utilized for fishculture is estimated to range between 3-4 million hectares, and this area could be expanded to approximately 30 million hectares which could, with improved aquaculture methodology, increase present level of production of about 5 MMT to 50 MMT by the end of this century. The major expansion would be into presently unused resources and not encroach onto lands now in production. (1) Report of the Technical Advisory Committee on Aquaculture, Consultative Group on International Agricultural reasearch, FAO, Rome. 1973 -4­ 13. Definition Aquaculture may be defined as the culture of food crops in water. Different culture systems have been developed for fresh­ water, brackish water and sea water where crops produced are proncipally fish, shrimp, bivalves (mussels and oysters) and certain edible aquatic plants. The significance of aquaculture in the nutrition of many countries is considerably more important than is indicated by the volume of production. Production through aquacultuve constitutes 40 percent of total fish harvest in China, 38, 22 and 20 percent of the total annual fish production in India, Indonesia and the Philippines respectively (2 ) . Another example of the importance of aquaculture to a country bordering the Mediter­ ranean Sea is Israel where fish culture harvest amounts to 50 perccit of the total fisheries annual catch.(3) C. Importance Aquaculture makes a significantly large contribution to the food supplies of developing countries. It now contributeg four percent of the world's animal protein supply (milk excluded), and its importance in the nutrition of certain countries, especially landlocked ones, is greater than the magnitude of production suggests. Its considerable importance in integrated rural devel­ opment is indicated by the increasing impact of the industry in developing countries and by recent results of development programs. (2) FAO Aquaculture Bulletin, Volume 5, April-July, 1973. (3) BAMIDCEH Bulletin of Fish Culture in Israel, Vol. 25, No. 2, June, 1973. - 5 - The future potential for an increased production of protein food by aquaculture is very large. While capture fisheries for food fish are not expected to double their present tonnage (45 MT), means can already be identified to prompt a ten-fold increase in aquaculture production. Even greater increases are possible if certain unproved and imaginative techniques (e.g. artificial upwelling of deep water) can be developed. Unlike capture fisheries production, which is to a large extent dependent on uncontrollable natural variables, the limitations on production in aquaculture are directly related to inputs. The total area presently under fish culture is not accurately known but is believed to be in the order of 3-4 million ha. It is estimated that this area could be increased up to about 30 million ha. A significant proportion of these large potential increases in aquaculture production will depend upon the solution df certain problems through research. On-going research does not now solve the problems at a pace which is desirable, and which would be possible if the effort were reinforced strongly by coordinated planning and financial assistance. Other constraints (e.g. lack of development policies and programs in aquaculture, pollution, site competition) also reatrict expansion of aqua­ culture, but with only their partial resolution significant advances could be made through research.are summarized in the next section. - 6 - IV. Purposes and Types of Aquaculture A. Characteristics of Aquaculture Although aquaculture, especially the culture of fish in ponds, originated many centuries ago, it is practiced on a large scale only in relatively few countries. Food production from this source has been significant in Asia and the Far East, but the overall importance of aquaculture in human nutrition came to be recognized only in recent years. Studies on quantity and quality
Recommended publications
  • AU-COM2017-349 Date of Issue 27 April 2017 Date of Expiry 30 December 2019
    Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Regulations 2000 Access to Biological Resources in a Commonwealth Area for Non-Commercial Purposes Permit number AU-COM2017-349 Date of issue 27 April 2017 Date of expiry 30 December 2019 Name and organisation of person to Dr Alison King and Dion Wedd whom the permit is issued: Charles Darwin University c/-RIEL, S of Environment, Charles Darwin University, Ellengowan Drive, Brinkin NT 0909 Provision of Regulations for which permit issued 8A.06 Collection of biological material from Kakadu National Park – Charles Darwin University Access is permitted to the following location: Mary River, Kakadu National Park to collect the following biological resources for non-commercial purposes: a maximum of the following: Common Name Scientific Name Amount/ Volume Longfin glassfish Ambassis interrupta 20 Macleay's glassfish Ambassis macleayi 20 Vachell’s Glassfish Ambassis vachellii 20 Northwest glassfish Ambassis sp. 50 Barred Grunter Amniataba percoides 150 short fin eel Anguilla bicolor 20 Toothless catfish Anodontiglanis dahli 20 Snub-nosed garfish Arrhamphus sclerolepis 20 Freshwater sole Brachirus selheimi 20 Crimson-tipped gudgeon Butis butis 20 bull shark Carcharhinus leucas 20 smallmouth catfish Cinetodus frogatti 20 Fly-specked hardyhead Craterocephalus stercusmuscarum 20 Strawman hardyhead Craterocephalus stramineus 200 Anchovy sp. Engraulidae 20 silver biddy Gerres filamentosus 20 Mouth almighty Glossamia aprion 50 Permit Number: AU-COM2017-349 Page 1 of 4 Environment Protection and
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Aquaculture in the United States: Economic Considerations, Implications & Opportunities
    Offshore Aquaculture in the United States: Economic Considerations, Implications & Opportunities July 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration Silver Spring, Maryland NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS F/SPO-103 You may download an electronic version of this report from: http://aquaculture.noaa.gov This document should be cited as follows: Rubino, Michael (editor). 2008. Offshore Aquaculture in the United States: Economic Considerations, Implications & Opportunities. U.S. Department of Commerce; Silver Spring, MD; USA. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS F/SPO-103. 263 pages. For more information: NOAA Aquaculture Program 1315 East-West Hwy. SSMC #3 – Room 13117 Silver Spring MD 20910 (301) 713-9079 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://aquaculture.noaa.gov Offshore Aquaculture in the United States: Economic Considerations, Implications & Opportunities Prepared by the NOAA Aquaculture Program From technical contributions by James L. Anderson, John Forster, Di Jin, James E. Kirkley, Gunnar Knapp, Colin E. Nash, Michael Rubino, Gina L. Shamshak, Diego Valderrama NOAA Aquaculture Program 1315 East-West Hwy. SSMC #3 – Room 13117 Silver Spring MD 20910 July 2008 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Carlos M. Gutierrez, Secretary NATIONAL OCEANIC & ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION Vice Admiral Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr. USN (Ret.), Administrator NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE James Balsiger, Assistant Administrator for Fisheries This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction …………………………………………………………….. 1 Michael Rubino Chapter 2: Economic Potential for U.S. Offshore Aquaculture: An Analytical Approach ………………………………………………. 15 Gunnar Knapp Chapter 3: Emerging Technologies in Marine Aquaculture ……………………….. 51 John Forster Chapter 4: Future Aquaculture Feeds and Feed Costs: The Role of Fish Meal and Fish Oil …………………………………… 73 Gina Shamshak & James Anderson Chapter 5: Lessons from the Development of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of the King Edward River in the Kimberley Region, Western Australia
    Records of the Western Australian Museum 25: 351–368 (2010). Fishes of the King Edward River in the Kimberley region, Western Australia David L. Morgan Freshwater Fish Group, Centre for Fish and Fisheries Research, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract – The King Edward River, in the far north of the Kimberley region of Western Australia drains approximately 10,000 km2 and discharges into the Timor Sea near the town of Kalumburu. This study represents an ichthyological survey of the river’s freshwaters and revealed that the number of freshwater fishes of the King Edward River is higher than has previously been recorded for a Western Australian river. Twenty-six strictly freshwater fish species were recorded, which is three species higher than the much larger Fitzroy River in the southern Kimberley. The study also identified a number of range extensions, including Butler’s Grunter and Shovel-nosed Catfish to the west, and the Slender Gudgeon to the north and east. A possibly undescribed species of glassfish, that differs morphologically from described species in arrangement of head spines, fin rays, as well as relative body measurements, is reported. A considerable proportion of Jenkins’ Grunter, which is widespread throughout the system but essentially restricted to main channel sites, had ‘blubber-lips’. There were significant differences in the prevailing fish fauna of the different reaches of the King Edward River system. Thus fish associations in the upper King Edward River main channel were significantly different to those in the tributaries and the main channel of the Carson River.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Review on Status and Trends in Aquaculture Development in North America: Canada and the United States of America — 2010
    FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1061/2 FIRA/C1061/2 (En) ISSN 2070-6065 REGIONAL REVIEW ON STATUS AND TRENDS IN AQUACULTURE DEVELOPMENT IN NORTH AMERICA: CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA — 2010 Cover: Cage farming in Canada.Photo courtesy of Marine Harvest. J. Aguilar-Manjarrez, S. Borghesi and P. Olin. Copies of FAO publications can be requested from: Sales and Marketing Group Office of Knowledge Exchange, Research and Extension Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations E-mail: [email protected] Fax: +39 06 57053360 Web site: www.fao.org/icatalog/inter-e.htm FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1061/2 FIRA/C1061/2 (En) Regional Review on Status and Trends in Aquaculture Development in North America: Canada and the United States of America — 2010 by Paul G. Olin California Sea Grant Scripps Institution of Oceanography University of California San Diego United States of America James Smith Aquaculture Management Directorate Fisheries and Oceans Canada Canada Rashed Nabi Aquaculture Management Directorate Fisheries and Oceans Canada Canada FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS ROME, 2011 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries Guidelines for Design of Stream Crossings
    Fish Habitat Guideline FHG 001 FISH PASSAGE IN STREAMS Fisheries guidelines for design of stream crossings Elizabeth Cotterell August 1998 Fisheries Group DPI ISSN 1441-1652 Agdex 486/042 FHG 001 First published August 1998 Information contained in this publication is provided as general advice only. For application to specific circumstances, professional advice should be sought. The Queensland Department of Primary Industries has taken all reasonable steps to ensure the information contained in this publication is accurate at the time of publication. Readers should ensure that they make appropriate enquiries to determine whether new information is available on the particular subject matter. © The State of Queensland, Department of Primary Industries 1998 Copyright protects this publication. Except for purposes permitted by the Copyright Act, reproduction by whatever means is prohibited without the prior written permission of the Department of Primary Industries, Queensland. Enquiries should be addressed to: Manager Publishing Services Queensland Department of Primary Industries GPO Box 46 Brisbane QLD 4001 Fisheries Guidelines for Design of Stream Crossings BACKGROUND Introduction Fish move widely in rivers and creeks throughout Queensland and Australia. Fish movement is usually associated with reproduction, feeding, escaping predators or dispersing to new habitats. This occurs between marine and freshwater habitats, and wholly within freshwater. Obstacles to this movement, such as stream crossings, can severely deplete fish populations, including recreational and commercial species such as barramundi, mullet, Mary River cod, silver perch, golden perch, sooty grunter and Australian bass. Many Queensland streams are ephemeral (they may flow only during the wet season), and therefore crossings must be designed for both flood and drought conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Risk Assessment of Cane Toads in Kakadu National Park Scientist Report 164, Supervising Scientist, Darwin NT
    supervising scientist 164 report A preliminary risk assessment of cane toads in Kakadu National Park RA van Dam, DJ Walden & GW Begg supervising scientist national centre for tropical wetland research This report has been prepared by staff of the Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist (eriss) as part of our commitment to the National Centre for Tropical Wetland Research Rick A van Dam Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, Locked Bag 2, Jabiru NT 0886, Australia (Present address: Sinclair Knight Merz, 100 Christie St, St Leonards NSW 2065, Australia) David J Walden Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801, Australia George W Begg Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801, Australia This report should be cited as follows: van Dam RA, Walden DJ & Begg GW 2002 A preliminary risk assessment of cane toads in Kakadu National Park Scientist Report 164, Supervising Scientist, Darwin NT The Supervising Scientist is part of Environment Australia, the environmental program of the Commonwealth Department of Environment and Heritage © Commonwealth of Australia 2002 Supervising Scientist Environment Australia GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801 Australia ISSN 1325-1554 ISBN 0 642 24370 0 This work is copyright Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Supervising Scientist Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of the King Edward and Carson Rivers with Their Belaa and Ngarinyin Names
    Fishes of the King Edward and Carson Rivers with their Belaa and Ngarinyin names By David Morgan, Dolores Cheinmora Agnes Charles, Pansy Nulgit & Kimberley Language Resource Centre Freshwater Fish Group CENTRE FOR FISH & FISHERIES RESEARCH Kimberley Language Resource Centre Milyengki Carson Pool Dolores Cheinmora: Nyarrinjali, kaawi-lawu yarn’ nyerreingkana, Milyengki-ngûndalu. Waj’ nyerreingkana, kaawi-ku, kawii amûrike omûrung, yilarra a-mûrike omûrung. Agnes Charles: We are here at Milyengki looking for fish. He got one barramundi, a small one. Yilarra is the barramundi’s name. Dolores Cheinmora: Wardi-di kala’ angbûnkû naa? Agnes Charles: Can you see the fish, what sort of fish is that? Dolores Cheinmora: Anja kûkûridingei, Kalamburru-ngûndalu. Agnes Charles: This fish, the Barred Grunter, lives in the Kalumburu area. Title: Fishes of the King Edward and Carson Rivers with their Belaa and Ngarinyin names Authors: D. Morgan1 D. Cheinmora2, A. Charles2, Pansy Nulgit3 & Kimberley Language Resource Centre4 1Centre for Fish & Fisheries Research, Murdoch University, South St Murdoch WA 6150 2Kalumburu Aboriginal Corporation 3Kupungari Aboriginal Corporation 4Siobhan Casson, Margaret Sefton, Patsy Bedford, June Oscar, Vicki Butters - Kimberley Language Resource Centre, Halls Creek, PMB 11, Halls Creek WA 6770 Project funded by: Land & Water Australia Photographs on front cover: Lower King Edward River Long-nose Grunter (inset). July 2006 Land & Water Australia Project No. UMU22 Fishes of the King Edward River - Centre for Fish & Fisheries Research, Murdoch University / Kimberley Language Resource Centre 2 Acknowledgements Most importantly we would like to thank the people of the Kimberley, particularly the Traditional Owners at Kalumburu and Prap Prap. This project would not have been possible without the financial support of Land & Water Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX 1 Classified List of Fishes Mentioned in the Text, with Scientific and Common Names
    APPENDIX 1 Classified list of fishes mentioned in the text, with scientific and common names. ___________________________________________________________ Scientific names and classification are from Nelson (1994). Families are listed in the same order as in Nelson (1994), with species names following in alphabetical order. The common names of British fishes mostly follow Wheeler (1978). Common names of foreign fishes are taken from Froese & Pauly (2002). Species in square brackets are referred to in the text but are not found in British waters. Fishes restricted to fresh water are shown in bold type. Fishes ranging from fresh water through brackish water to the sea are underlined; this category includes diadromous fishes that regularly migrate between marine and freshwater environments, spawning either in the sea (catadromous fishes) or in fresh water (anadromous fishes). Not indicated are marine or freshwater fishes that occasionally venture into brackish water. Superclass Agnatha (jawless fishes) Class Myxini (hagfishes)1 Order Myxiniformes Family Myxinidae Myxine glutinosa, hagfish Class Cephalaspidomorphi (lampreys)1 Order Petromyzontiformes Family Petromyzontidae [Ichthyomyzon bdellium, Ohio lamprey] Lampetra fluviatilis, lampern, river lamprey Lampetra planeri, brook lamprey [Lampetra tridentata, Pacific lamprey] Lethenteron camtschaticum, Arctic lamprey] [Lethenteron zanandreai, Po brook lamprey] Petromyzon marinus, lamprey Superclass Gnathostomata (fishes with jaws) Grade Chondrichthiomorphi Class Chondrichthyes (cartilaginous
    [Show full text]
  • Movements of Forktail Catfish in the Daly River, Northern Territory, As Determined by Otolith Chemistry Analysis
    Movements of Forktail Catfish in the Daly River, Northern Territory, as Determined by Otolith Chemistry Analysis Thesis submitted by Sally Catherine Oughton (BSc/BComm) in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science with Honours in the School of Environmental and Life Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Health, Science and the Environment, Charles Darwin University. June 2014. Statement of Authorship I declare that this thesis is my own work and has not been submitted in any form for another degree or diploma at any university or other institute of tertiary education. Information derived from the published and unpublished work of others has been acknowledged in the text and a list of references given. Sally Catherine Oughton Cover Illustration: Daly River at Galloping Jacks (left), and an otolith section magnified under transmitted light. I Abstract Although the vast majority of fishes spend their entire lives in either fresh water or the sea, some are capable of moving across salinity gradients. “Diadromous” species migrate between fresh and salt water on a regular, well-defined basis, whereas “euryhaline” species move across salinity gradients freely and not necessarily at particular life history stages. These species are particularly vulnerable to anthropogenic developments that regulate flow and diminish connectivity between freshwater and marine biomes, such as the construction of dams and extraction of water for agricultural use. As a result, diadromous and euryhaline species are considered among the most threatened vertebrate groups in the world. Studying fish movement behaviour provides vital information on the importance of different aquatic habitats and species’ ecological roles, and improves environmental management outcomes for diadromous species.
    [Show full text]
  • The Salty Corner Meets the Year of the Catfish – Marine Catfish
    YYeeaarr ooff tthhee CCaattffiisshh A monthly column about Catfish The Salty Corner meets The Year of the Catfish: Marine Catfish By Derek P.S. Tustin So Klaus, recognizing something is missing in our club, has begun a new series of articles in Tank Talk on marine fishkeeping. I’ll admit I’ve been tempted at times to start up a saltwater tank, and I know that several members of our club have taken the leap in the last couple of years. I’ve been reading Klaus’ new selection of articles, published under the name The Salty Corner, with some interest. In doing so, and considering the research I’ve been doing for our Year of the Catfish, I got to wondering, “Are there any marine catfish?” Short answer is yes. Realistic answer is a bit more complicated. It appears that there is no family of catfish wherein all members of the family are marine Plotosus lineatus catfish. But there are two families of catfish, Ariidae and Plotosidae, where some species of the family are indeed brackish and marine. Ariidae Ariidae is a family of catfish that encompass marine, brackish and freshwater species, with the majority of the species being from marine habitats. As a group they are called “Sea Catfish” and are found in the tropical to sub-tropical zones of North America, South America, Africa, Asia and Australia (being absent from both Europe and Antarctica). There are about 30 genera in the Ariidae family encompassing approximately 150 species. They usually have a deeply forked caudal fin, three pairs of barbels, and bony plates on their heads and near their dorsal fins.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Fish and Aquatic Habitat Survey of Cape York Peninsula
    CAPE YORK PENINSULA NATURAL RESOURCES ANALYSIS PROGRAM (NRAP) FRESHWATER FISH AND AQUATIC HABITAT SURVEY OF CAPE YORK PENINSULA B. W. Herbert, J.A. Peeters, P.A. Graham and A.E. Hogan Freshwater Fisheries and Aquaculture Centre Queensland Department of Primary Industries 1995 CYPLUS is a joint initiative of the Queensland and Commonwealth Governments CAPE YORK PENINSULA LAND USE STRATEGY (CYPLUS) Natural Resources Analysis Program FRESHWATER FISH AND AQUATIC HABITAT SURVEY OF CAPE YORK PENINSULA B. W. Herbert, J. A. Peeters, P.A. Graham and A.E. Hogan Freshwater Fisheries and Aquaculture Centre Queensland Department of Primary Industries 1995 CYPLUS is a joint initiative of the Queensland and Commonwealth Governments Final report on project: NRlO - FISH FAUNA SURVEY Recommended citation: Herbert, B.W., Peeters, J.A., Graham, P.A. and Hogan, A.E. (1995). 'Freshwater Fish and Aquatic Habitat Survey of Cape York Peninsula'. (Cape York Peninsula Land Use Strategy, Office of the Co-ordinator General of Queensland, Brisbane, Department of the Environment, Sport and Territories, Canberra, Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Brisbane.) Note: Due to the timing of publication, reports on other CYPLUS projects may not be fully cited in the REFERENCES section. However, they should be able to be located by author, agency or subject. ISBN 0 7242 6204 0 The State of Queensland and Commonwealth of Australia 1995. Copyright protects this publication. Except for purposes permitted by the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any means without the prior written permission of the Office of the Co-ordinator General of Queensland and the Australian Government Publishing Service.
    [Show full text]
  • The Living Planet Index (Lpi) for Migratory Freshwater Fish Technical Report
    THE LIVING PLANET INDEX (LPI) FOR MIGRATORY FRESHWATER FISH LIVING PLANET INDEX TECHNICAL1 REPORT LIVING PLANET INDEXTECHNICAL REPORT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are very grateful to a number of individuals and organisations who have worked with the LPD and/or shared their data. A full list of all partners and collaborators can be found on the LPI website. 2 INDEX TABLE OF CONTENTS Stefanie Deinet1, Kate Scott-Gatty1, Hannah Rotton1, PREFERRED CITATION 2 1 1 Deinet, S., Scott-Gatty, K., Rotton, H., Twardek, W. M., William M. Twardek , Valentina Marconi , Louise McRae , 5 GLOSSARY Lee J. Baumgartner3, Kerry Brink4, Julie E. Claussen5, Marconi, V., McRae, L., Baumgartner, L. J., Brink, K., Steven J. Cooke2, William Darwall6, Britas Klemens Claussen, J. E., Cooke, S. J., Darwall, W., Eriksson, B. K., Garcia Eriksson7, Carlos Garcia de Leaniz8, Zeb Hogan9, Joshua de Leaniz, C., Hogan, Z., Royte, J., Silva, L. G. M., Thieme, 6 SUMMARY 10 11, 12 13 M. L., Tickner, D., Waldman, J., Wanningen, H., Weyl, O. L. Royte , Luiz G. M. Silva , Michele L. Thieme , David Tickner14, John Waldman15, 16, Herman Wanningen4, Olaf F., Berkhuysen, A. (2020) The Living Planet Index (LPI) for 8 INTRODUCTION L. F. Weyl17, 18 , and Arjan Berkhuysen4 migratory freshwater fish - Technical Report. World Fish Migration Foundation, The Netherlands. 1 Indicators & Assessments Unit, Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society 11 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION of London, United Kingdom Edited by Mark van Heukelum 11 Data set 2 Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Design Shapeshifter.nl Biology and Institute of Environmental Science, Carleton University, Drawings Jeroen Helmer 12 Global trend Ottawa, ON, Canada 15 Tropical and temperate zones 3 Institute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University, Albury, Photography We gratefully acknowledge all of the 17 Regions New South Wales, Australia photographers who gave us permission 20 Migration categories 4 World Fish Migration Foundation, The Netherlands to use their photographic material.
    [Show full text]