DOCSLIB.ORG

AU-COM2017-349 Date of Issue 27 April 2017 Date of Expiry 30 December 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AU-COM2017-349 Date of Issue 27 April 2017 Date of Expiry 30 December 2019 Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Regulations 2000 Access to Biological Resources in a Commonwealth Area for Non-Commercial Purposes Permit number AU-COM2017-349 Date of issue 27 April 2017 Date of expiry 30 December 2019 Name and organisation of person to Dr Alison King and Dion Wedd whom the permit is issued: Charles Darwin University c/-RIEL, S of Environment, Charles Darwin University, Ellengowan Drive, Brinkin NT 0909 Provision of Regulations for which permit issued 8A.06 Collection of biological material from Kakadu National Park – Charles Darwin University Access is permitted to the following location: Mary River, Kakadu National Park to collect the following biological resources for non-commercial purposes: a maximum of the following: Common Name Scientific Name Amount/ Volume Longfin glassfish Ambassis interrupta 20 Macleay's glassfish Ambassis macleayi 20 Vachell’s Glassfish Ambassis vachellii 20 Northwest glassfish Ambassis sp. 50 Barred Grunter Amniataba percoides 150 short fin eel Anguilla bicolor 20 Toothless catfish Anodontiglanis dahli 20 Snub-nosed garfish Arrhamphus sclerolepis 20 Freshwater sole Brachirus selheimi 20 Crimson-tipped gudgeon Butis butis 20 bull shark Carcharhinus leucas 20 smallmouth catfish Cinetodus frogatti 20 Fly-specked hardyhead Craterocephalus stercusmuscarum 20 Strawman hardyhead Craterocephalus stramineus 200 Anchovy sp. Engraulidae 20 silver biddy Gerres filamentosus 20 Mouth almighty Glossamia aprion 50 Permit Number: AU-COM2017-349 Page 1 of 4 Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Regulations 2000 Golden goby Glossogobius aureus 50 Flathead goby Glossogobius giuris 20 Square blotch goby Glossogobius munroi 20 Sooty Grunter Hephaestus fuliginosus 50 Freshwater Whipray Himantura dalyensis 20 Empire gudgeon Hypseleotris compressa 20 Nurseryfish Kurtus gulliveri 20 Barramundi Lates calcarifer 150 Common ponyfish Leiognathus equulus 20 Spangled perch Leiopotherapon unicolor 50 Freshwater sole Leptachirus triramus 50 Darwin sole Leptachirus darwinensis 20 Ord River mullet Liza ordensis 150 Tarpon Megalops cyprinoides 20 Western rainbowfish Melanotaenia australis 200 Exquisite rainbowfish Melanotaenia exquisita 20 Black-banded rainbowfish Melanotaenia nigrans 20 chequered rainbowfish Melanotaenia splendida inornata 200 Northern trout gudgeon Mogurnda mogurnda 50 Mangrove gobies Mugilogobius spp. 50 Bony bream Nematalosa erebi 200 Berney's catfish Neoarius berneyi 20 Blue catfish Neoarius graeffei 50 Triangular shield catfish Neoarius leptaspis 20 Shovel-nosed catfish Neoarius midgleyi 20 Black catfish Neosilurus ater 50 Hyrtl's tandan Neosilurus hyrtlii 20 False spined catfish Neosilurus pseudospinosus 20 Sinuous gudgeon Odonteleotris macrodon 20 Swamp eel Ophisternon gutturale 20 Sleepy cod Oxyeleotris lineolatus 20 Poreless gudgeon Oxyeleotris nullipora 20 Giant gudgeon Oxyeleotris selheimi 20 Webers Mudskipper Periophthalmus weberi 20 Lorentz grunter Pingalla lorentzi 20 Obbes' catfish Porochilus obbesi 20 Rendahl's catfish Porochilus rendahli 50 Small-eyed sleeper Prionobutis microps 20 Freshwater sawfish Pristis pristis 2 Snubnose goby Pseudogobius sp. 20 Spotted blue-eye Pseudomugil gertrudae 50 Delicate blue-eye Pseudomugil tenellus 50 Spot fin goby Redigobius chrysosoma 20 Spotted scat Scatophagus argus 20 Northern saratoga Scleropages jardinii 20 Freshwater longtom Strongylura kreffti 20 Butler's grunter Syncomistes butleri 50 Archerfish Toxotes chatareus 100 Primitive archerfish Toxotes lorentzi 20 River garfish Zenarchopterus spp. 20 Fly-specked hardyhead Craterocephalus stercusmuscarum 20 Spangled perch Leiopotherapon unicolor 20 Northern trout gudgeon Mogurnda mogurnda 10 Rainbowfish complex Melanotaenia Sp. 20 Bony bream Nematalosa erebi 20 Barramundi Lates calcarifer 10 Ord River mullet Liza ordensis 20 Permit Number: AU-COM2017-349 Page 2 of 4 Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Regulations 2000 Barred grunter Amniataba percoides 20 Sleepy cod Oxyeleotris lineolatus 10 Sooty grunter Hephaestus fuliginosus 10 Narrow-fronted catfish Neosilurus ater 10 Mouth almighty Glossamia aprion 10 Lesser salmon catfish Neoarius graeffei 10 Triangular shield catfish Neoarius leptaspis 10 Fork-tailed catfish Neoarius midgleyi 10 Riparian vegetation Various 3 leaves or blades of grass for representative species Aquatic and emergent Various species such as water lilies, 3 leaves for representative species macrophytes Vallisneria, Hydrilla, Aponogeton, Limnophylla etc. Benthic algae Various species Small scraping from substrate, not more than 20ml sample Invertebrates Insects and crustaceans. 10-15 of each species sampled in a small dip net from 3 sites within the collection area Zooplankton Crustaceans, rotifers, water fleas and fish Towing a small plankton net and invertebrate larvae. (diameter ~30cm), towed behind a boat for 100m. Phytoplankton Various pelagic algae species A 200ml water sample filtered through a glass mat filter. Conditions: 1. The permit holder may authorise in writing another person to perform actions specified in this permit. 2. The permit holder must obtain all other required permit(s) to conduct the specified project. 3. Collection methods shall not attract undue attention or cause unapproved damage, depletion, or disturbance to the environment and other resources such as historic sites. 4. The permit holder will maintain records for each biological sample taken in accordance with subregulation 8A.19 of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Regulations 2000, and provide a copy of these records to the Commonwealth within a reasonable period after the sample is taken. 5. No specimens (including materials) may be collected unless authorised by this permit. 6. The permit holder who undertakes an activity that results in the unintentional death, injury, trading, taking, keeping or moving of a member of a listed threatened species (except a conservation dependent species), a member of a listed threatened ecological community, a member of a listed migratory species, or a member of a listed marine species in or on a Commonwealth area that was not authorised by the permit must notify the Department of the Environment and Energy (The Secretary, Department of the Environment and Energy, GPO Box 787, Canberra ACT 2601; email: [email protected]) within 7 days of becoming aware of the results of the activity. Permit Number: AU-COM2017-349 Page 3 of 4 Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Regulations 2000 7. The permit holder shall not use the biological resources to which this permit relates for commercial purposes, and will provide a written report on the results of any research on the biological resources to the Commonwealth of Australia. 8. The permit holder will not give the sample to any person without permission of the Commonwealth of Australia. 9. The permit holder will not carry out, or allow others to carry out, research or development for commercial purposes on any genetic resources, or biochemical compounds, comprising or contained in the biological resources unless a benefit sharing agreement has been entered into with the access provider. 10. Access is permitted for Non-Commercial purposes. Failure to adhere to these conditions is an offence and may also result in suspension or cancellation of this permit. Date 02/05/17 . Ben Phillips, Director, Protected Area Policy and Planning Permit issued by Delegate of the Minister for the Environment and Energy Permit Number: AU-COM2017-349 Page 4 of 4 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Common Lexical Semantics in Dalabon Ethnobiological Classification
    This item is Chapter 15 of Language, land & song: Studies in honour of Luise Hercus Editors: Peter K. Austin, Harold Koch & Jane Simpson ISBN 978-0-728-60406-3 http://www.elpublishing.org/book/language-land-and-song Common lexical semantics in Dalabon ethnobiological classification Sarah Cutfield Cite this item: Sarah Cutfield (2016). Common lexical semantics in Dalabon ethnobiological classification. In Language, land & song: Studies in honour of Luise Hercus, edited by Peter K. Austin, Harold Koch & Jane Simpson. London: EL Publishing. pp. 209-227 Link to this item: http://www.elpublishing.org/PID/2015 __________________________________________________ This electronic version first published: March 2017 © 2016 Sarah Cutfield ______________________________________________________ EL Publishing Open access, peer-reviewed electronic and print journals, multimedia, and monographs on documentation and support of endangered languages, including theory and practice of language documentation, language description, sociolinguistics, language policy, and language revitalisation. For more EL Publishing items, see http://www.elpublishing.org 15 Common lexical semantics in Dalabon ethnobiological classification Sarah Cutfield School of Literature, Languages and Linguistics & The ARC Centre of Excellence for the Dynamics of Language, Australian National University 1. Introduction1 This paper is an analysis of the common lexical semantics in ethnobiological classification in Dalabon (Gunwinyguan, non-Pama-Nyungan), based on the intensive documentation in Bordulk et al. (2012), who cover 821 names for over 550 species, an unusually high number of named species for languages in Australia’s Top End (GW pers. com.). Dalabon shares many of the common formal and semantic features described for ethnoclassification in Australian languages. I present an overview and detailed exemplification of these phenomena in Dalabon, and highlight data which do not pattern according to common observations of ‘formal linguistic similarities indicate semiotic relationship’ in Australian languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Genomics of a Plastic Life History Trait: Galaxias Maculatus Amphidromous and Resident Populations
    EVOLUTIONARY GENOMICS OF A PLASTIC LIFE HISTORY TRAIT: GALAXIAS MACULATUS AMPHIDROMOUS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS by María Lisette Delgado Aquije Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia August 2021 Dalhousie University is located in Mi'kma'ki, the ancestral and unceded territory of the Mi'kmaq. We are all Treaty people. © Copyright by María Lisette Delgado Aquije, 2021 I dedicate this work to my parents, María and José, my brothers JR and Eduardo for their unconditional love and support and for always encouraging me to pursue my dreams, and to my grandparents Victoria, Estela, Jesús, and Pepe whose example of perseverance and hard work allowed me to reach this point. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ vii LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................... ix ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................... xii LIST OF ABBREVIATION USED ................................................................................ xiii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................ xv CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 1 1.1 Galaxias maculatus ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Aquaculture in the United States: Economic Considerations, Implications & Opportunities
    Offshore Aquaculture in the United States: Economic Considerations, Implications & Opportunities July 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration Silver Spring, Maryland NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS F/SPO-103 You may download an electronic version of this report from: http://aquaculture.noaa.gov This document should be cited as follows: Rubino, Michael (editor). 2008. Offshore Aquaculture in the United States: Economic Considerations, Implications & Opportunities. U.S. Department of Commerce; Silver Spring, MD; USA. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS F/SPO-103. 263 pages. For more information: NOAA Aquaculture Program 1315 East-West Hwy. SSMC #3 – Room 13117 Silver Spring MD 20910 (301) 713-9079 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://aquaculture.noaa.gov Offshore Aquaculture in the United States: Economic Considerations, Implications & Opportunities Prepared by the NOAA Aquaculture Program From technical contributions by James L. Anderson, John Forster, Di Jin, James E. Kirkley, Gunnar Knapp, Colin E. Nash, Michael Rubino, Gina L. Shamshak, Diego Valderrama NOAA Aquaculture Program 1315 East-West Hwy. SSMC #3 – Room 13117 Silver Spring MD 20910 July 2008 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Carlos M. Gutierrez, Secretary NATIONAL OCEANIC & ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION Vice Admiral Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr. USN (Ret.), Administrator NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE James Balsiger, Assistant Administrator for Fisheries This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction …………………………………………………………….. 1 Michael Rubino Chapter 2: Economic Potential for U.S. Offshore Aquaculture: An Analytical Approach ………………………………………………. 15 Gunnar Knapp Chapter 3: Emerging Technologies in Marine Aquaculture ……………………….. 51 John Forster Chapter 4: Future Aquaculture Feeds and Feed Costs: The Role of Fish Meal and Fish Oil …………………………………… 73 Gina Shamshak & James Anderson Chapter 5: Lessons from the Development of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of the King Edward River in the Kimberley Region, Western Australia
    Records of the Western Australian Museum 25: 351–368 (2010). Fishes of the King Edward River in the Kimberley region, Western Australia David L. Morgan Freshwater Fish Group, Centre for Fish and Fisheries Research, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract – The King Edward River, in the far north of the Kimberley region of Western Australia drains approximately 10,000 km2 and discharges into the Timor Sea near the town of Kalumburu. This study represents an ichthyological survey of the river’s freshwaters and revealed that the number of freshwater fishes of the King Edward River is higher than has previously been recorded for a Western Australian river. Twenty-six strictly freshwater fish species were recorded, which is three species higher than the much larger Fitzroy River in the southern Kimberley. The study also identified a number of range extensions, including Butler’s Grunter and Shovel-nosed Catfish to the west, and the Slender Gudgeon to the north and east. A possibly undescribed species of glassfish, that differs morphologically from described species in arrangement of head spines, fin rays, as well as relative body measurements, is reported. A considerable proportion of Jenkins’ Grunter, which is widespread throughout the system but essentially restricted to main channel sites, had ‘blubber-lips’. There were significant differences in the prevailing fish fauna of the different reaches of the King Edward River system. Thus fish associations in the upper King Edward River main channel were significantly different to those in the tributaries and the main channel of the Carson River.
    [Show full text]
  • Status Review, Disease Risk Analysis and Conservation Action Plan for The
    Status Review, Disease Risk Analysis and Conservation Action Plan for the Bellinger River Snapping Turtle (Myuchelys georgesi) December, 2016 1 Workshop participants. Back row (l to r): Ricky Spencer, Bruce Chessman, Kristen Petrov, Caroline Lees, Gerald Kuchling, Jane Hall, Gerry McGilvray, Shane Ruming, Karrie Rose, Larry Vogelnest, Arthur Georges; Front row (l to r) Michael McFadden, Adam Skidmore, Sam Gilchrist, Bruno Ferronato, Richard Jakob-Hoff © Copyright 2017 CBSG IUCN encourages meetings, workshops and other fora for the consideration and analysis of issues related to conservation, and believes that reports of these meetings are most useful when broadly disseminated. The opinions and views expressed by the authors may not necessarily reflect the formal policies of IUCN, its Commissions, its Secretariat or its members. The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Jakob-Hoff, R. Lees C. M., McGilvray G, Ruming S, Chessman B, Gilchrist S, Rose K, Spencer R, Hall J (Eds) (2017). Status Review, Disease Risk Analysis and Conservation Action Plan for the Bellinger River Snapping Turtle. IUCN SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group: Apple Valley, MN. Cover photo: Juvenile Bellinger River Snapping Turtle © 2016 Brett Vercoe This report can be downloaded from the CBSG website: www.cbsg.org. 2 Executive Summary The Bellinger River Snapping Turtle (BRST) (Myuchelys georgesi) is a freshwater turtle endemic to a 60 km stretch of the Bellinger River, and possibly a portion of the nearby Kalang River in coastal north eastern New South Wales (NSW).
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Review on Status and Trends in Aquaculture Development in North America: Canada and the United States of America — 2010
    FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1061/2 FIRA/C1061/2 (En) ISSN 2070-6065 REGIONAL REVIEW ON STATUS AND TRENDS IN AQUACULTURE DEVELOPMENT IN NORTH AMERICA: CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA — 2010 Cover: Cage farming in Canada.Photo courtesy of Marine Harvest. J. Aguilar-Manjarrez, S. Borghesi and P. Olin. Copies of FAO publications can be requested from: Sales and Marketing Group Office of Knowledge Exchange, Research and Extension Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations E-mail: [email protected] Fax: +39 06 57053360 Web site: www.fao.org/icatalog/inter-e.htm FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1061/2 FIRA/C1061/2 (En) Regional Review on Status and Trends in Aquaculture Development in North America: Canada and the United States of America — 2010 by Paul G. Olin California Sea Grant Scripps Institution of Oceanography University of California San Diego United States of America James Smith Aquaculture Management Directorate Fisheries and Oceans Canada Canada Rashed Nabi Aquaculture Management Directorate Fisheries and Oceans Canada Canada FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS ROME, 2011 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries Guidelines for Design of Stream Crossings
    Fish Habitat Guideline FHG 001 FISH PASSAGE IN STREAMS Fisheries guidelines for design of stream crossings Elizabeth Cotterell August 1998 Fisheries Group DPI ISSN 1441-1652 Agdex 486/042 FHG 001 First published August 1998 Information contained in this publication is provided as general advice only. For application to specific circumstances, professional advice should be sought. The Queensland Department of Primary Industries has taken all reasonable steps to ensure the information contained in this publication is accurate at the time of publication. Readers should ensure that they make appropriate enquiries to determine whether new information is available on the particular subject matter. © The State of Queensland, Department of Primary Industries 1998 Copyright protects this publication. Except for purposes permitted by the Copyright Act, reproduction by whatever means is prohibited without the prior written permission of the Department of Primary Industries, Queensland. Enquiries should be addressed to: Manager Publishing Services Queensland Department of Primary Industries GPO Box 46 Brisbane QLD 4001 Fisheries Guidelines for Design of Stream Crossings BACKGROUND Introduction Fish move widely in rivers and creeks throughout Queensland and Australia. Fish movement is usually associated with reproduction, feeding, escaping predators or dispersing to new habitats. This occurs between marine and freshwater habitats, and wholly within freshwater. Obstacles to this movement, such as stream crossings, can severely deplete fish populations, including recreational and commercial species such as barramundi, mullet, Mary River cod, silver perch, golden perch, sooty grunter and Australian bass. Many Queensland streams are ephemeral (they may flow only during the wet season), and therefore crossings must be designed for both flood and drought conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of the King Edward and Carson Rivers with Their Belaa and Ngarinyin Names
    Fishes of the King Edward and Carson Rivers with their Belaa and Ngarinyin names By David Morgan, Dolores Cheinmora Agnes Charles, Pansy Nulgit & Kimberley Language Resource Centre Freshwater Fish Group CENTRE FOR FISH & FISHERIES RESEARCH Kimberley Language Resource Centre Milyengki Carson Pool Dolores Cheinmora: Nyarrinjali, kaawi-lawu yarn’ nyerreingkana, Milyengki-ngûndalu. Waj’ nyerreingkana, kaawi-ku, kawii amûrike omûrung, yilarra a-mûrike omûrung. Agnes Charles: We are here at Milyengki looking for fish. He got one barramundi, a small one. Yilarra is the barramundi’s name. Dolores Cheinmora: Wardi-di kala’ angbûnkû naa? Agnes Charles: Can you see the fish, what sort of fish is that? Dolores Cheinmora: Anja kûkûridingei, Kalamburru-ngûndalu. Agnes Charles: This fish, the Barred Grunter, lives in the Kalumburu area. Title: Fishes of the King Edward and Carson Rivers with their Belaa and Ngarinyin names Authors: D. Morgan1 D. Cheinmora2, A. Charles2, Pansy Nulgit3 & Kimberley Language Resource Centre4 1Centre for Fish & Fisheries Research, Murdoch University, South St Murdoch WA 6150 2Kalumburu Aboriginal Corporation 3Kupungari Aboriginal Corporation 4Siobhan Casson, Margaret Sefton, Patsy Bedford, June Oscar, Vicki Butters - Kimberley Language Resource Centre, Halls Creek, PMB 11, Halls Creek WA 6770 Project funded by: Land & Water Australia Photographs on front cover: Lower King Edward River Long-nose Grunter (inset). July 2006 Land & Water Australia Project No. UMU22 Fishes of the King Edward River - Centre for Fish & Fisheries Research, Murdoch University / Kimberley Language Resource Centre 2 Acknowledgements Most importantly we would like to thank the people of the Kimberley, particularly the Traditional Owners at Kalumburu and Prap Prap. This project would not have been possible without the financial support of Land & Water Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Movements of Forktail Catfish in the Daly River, Northern Territory, As Determined by Otolith Chemistry Analysis
    Movements of Forktail Catfish in the Daly River, Northern Territory, as Determined by Otolith Chemistry Analysis Thesis submitted by Sally Catherine Oughton (BSc/BComm) in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science with Honours in the School of Environmental and Life Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Health, Science and the Environment, Charles Darwin University. June 2014. Statement of Authorship I declare that this thesis is my own work and has not been submitted in any form for another degree or diploma at any university or other institute of tertiary education. Information derived from the published and unpublished work of others has been acknowledged in the text and a list of references given. Sally Catherine Oughton Cover Illustration: Daly River at Galloping Jacks (left), and an otolith section magnified under transmitted light. I Abstract Although the vast majority of fishes spend their entire lives in either fresh water or the sea, some are capable of moving across salinity gradients. “Diadromous” species migrate between fresh and salt water on a regular, well-defined basis, whereas “euryhaline” species move across salinity gradients freely and not necessarily at particular life history stages. These species are particularly vulnerable to anthropogenic developments that regulate flow and diminish connectivity between freshwater and marine biomes, such as the construction of dams and extraction of water for agricultural use. As a result, diadromous and euryhaline species are considered among the most threatened vertebrate groups in the world. Studying fish movement behaviour provides vital information on the importance of different aquatic habitats and species’ ecological roles, and improves environmental management outcomes for diadromous species.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Fish and Aquatic Habitat Survey of Cape York Peninsula
    CAPE YORK PENINSULA NATURAL RESOURCES ANALYSIS PROGRAM (NRAP) FRESHWATER FISH AND AQUATIC HABITAT SURVEY OF CAPE YORK PENINSULA B. W. Herbert, J.A. Peeters, P.A. Graham and A.E. Hogan Freshwater Fisheries and Aquaculture Centre Queensland Department of Primary Industries 1995 CYPLUS is a joint initiative of the Queensland and Commonwealth Governments CAPE YORK PENINSULA LAND USE STRATEGY (CYPLUS) Natural Resources Analysis Program FRESHWATER FISH AND AQUATIC HABITAT SURVEY OF CAPE YORK PENINSULA B. W. Herbert, J. A. Peeters, P.A. Graham and A.E. Hogan Freshwater Fisheries and Aquaculture Centre Queensland Department of Primary Industries 1995 CYPLUS is a joint initiative of the Queensland and Commonwealth Governments Final report on project: NRlO - FISH FAUNA SURVEY Recommended citation: Herbert, B.W., Peeters, J.A., Graham, P.A. and Hogan, A.E. (1995). 'Freshwater Fish and Aquatic Habitat Survey of Cape York Peninsula'. (Cape York Peninsula Land Use Strategy, Office of the Co-ordinator General of Queensland, Brisbane, Department of the Environment, Sport and Territories, Canberra, Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Brisbane.) Note: Due to the timing of publication, reports on other CYPLUS projects may not be fully cited in the REFERENCES section. However, they should be able to be located by author, agency or subject. ISBN 0 7242 6204 0 The State of Queensland and Commonwealth of Australia 1995. Copyright protects this publication. Except for purposes permitted by the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any means without the prior written permission of the Office of the Co-ordinator General of Queensland and the Australian Government Publishing Service.
    [Show full text]
  • The Living Planet Index (Lpi) for Migratory Freshwater Fish Technical Report
    THE LIVING PLANET INDEX (LPI) FOR MIGRATORY FRESHWATER FISH LIVING PLANET INDEX TECHNICAL1 REPORT LIVING PLANET INDEXTECHNICAL REPORT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are very grateful to a number of individuals and organisations who have worked with the LPD and/or shared their data. A full list of all partners and collaborators can be found on the LPI website. 2 INDEX TABLE OF CONTENTS Stefanie Deinet1, Kate Scott-Gatty1, Hannah Rotton1, PREFERRED CITATION 2 1 1 Deinet, S., Scott-Gatty, K., Rotton, H., Twardek, W. M., William M. Twardek , Valentina Marconi , Louise McRae , 5 GLOSSARY Lee J. Baumgartner3, Kerry Brink4, Julie E. Claussen5, Marconi, V., McRae, L., Baumgartner, L. J., Brink, K., Steven J. Cooke2, William Darwall6, Britas Klemens Claussen, J. E., Cooke, S. J., Darwall, W., Eriksson, B. K., Garcia Eriksson7, Carlos Garcia de Leaniz8, Zeb Hogan9, Joshua de Leaniz, C., Hogan, Z., Royte, J., Silva, L. G. M., Thieme, 6 SUMMARY 10 11, 12 13 M. L., Tickner, D., Waldman, J., Wanningen, H., Weyl, O. L. Royte , Luiz G. M. Silva , Michele L. Thieme , David Tickner14, John Waldman15, 16, Herman Wanningen4, Olaf F., Berkhuysen, A. (2020) The Living Planet Index (LPI) for 8 INTRODUCTION L. F. Weyl17, 18 , and Arjan Berkhuysen4 migratory freshwater fish - Technical Report. World Fish Migration Foundation, The Netherlands. 1 Indicators & Assessments Unit, Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society 11 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION of London, United Kingdom Edited by Mark van Heukelum 11 Data set 2 Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Design Shapeshifter.nl Biology and Institute of Environmental Science, Carleton University, Drawings Jeroen Helmer 12 Global trend Ottawa, ON, Canada 15 Tropical and temperate zones 3 Institute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University, Albury, Photography We gratefully acknowledge all of the 17 Regions New South Wales, Australia photographers who gave us permission 20 Migration categories 4 World Fish Migration Foundation, The Netherlands to use their photographic material.
    [Show full text]
  • Status Reports of the Fisheries and Aquatic Resources of Western
    Status reports of the fisheries and aquatic resources of Western Australia 2015/16 State of the fisheries Status reports of the fisheries and aquatic resources of Western Australia 2015/16 State of the fisheries Edited by W.J. Fletcher, M.D. Mumme and F.J. Webster Produced by the Science and Resource Assessment and Strategic and Aquatic Resource Divisions Published by the Department of Fisheries 3rd Floor, The Atrium 168 St Georges Terrace Perth WA 6000 Website: www.fish.wa.gov.au ABN: 55 689 794 771 ISSN 2200-7849 (Print) ISSN 2200-7857 (Online) Illustrations © R.Swainston/www.anima.net.au Suggested citation format: Entire report: Fletcher WJ, Mumme MD and Webster FJ. (eds). 2017. Status Reports of the Fisheries and Aquatic Resources of Western Australia 2015/16: The State of the Fisheries. Department of Fisheries, Western Australia. Individual status report: Strain L, Brown J and Walters S. 2017. West Coast Roe’s Abalone Resource Status Report 2016. In: Status Reports of the Fisheries and Aquatic Resources of Western Australia 2015/16: The State of the Fisheries eds. WJ Fletcher, MD Mumme and FJ Webster Department of Fisheries, Western Australia. pp. 39-43. CONTENTS EDITOR'S INTRODUCTION ................................... 1 NORTH COAST NEARSHORE AND ESTUARINE HOW TO USE THIS VOLUME ................................ 2 RESOURCE STATUS REPORT 2016 ........... 140 OVERVIEW OF THE STATUS OF KEY ECOLOGICAL NORTH COAST DEMERSAL RESOURCE RESOURCES (ASSETS) .......................................... 9 STATUS REPORT 2016 ............................. 144 ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT .............................. 21 STATEWIDE LARGE PELAGIC FINFISH WEST COAST BIOREGION .................................. 25 RESOURCE STATUS REPORT 2016 ........... 153 NORTH COAST PEARL OYSTER RESOURCE ABOUT THE BIOREGION ................................. 25 SUMMARY OF ACTIVITIES POTENTIALLY STATUS REPORT 2016 ............................
    [Show full text]