Regional Review on Status and Trends in Aquaculture Development in North America: Canada and the United States of America — 2010

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Regional Review on Status and Trends in Aquaculture Development in North America: Canada and the United States of America — 2010 FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1061/2 FIRA/C1061/2 (En) ISSN 2070-6065 REGIONAL REVIEW ON STATUS AND TRENDS IN AQUACULTURE DEVELOPMENT IN NORTH AMERICA: CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA — 2010 Cover: Cage farming in Canada.Photo courtesy of Marine Harvest. J. Aguilar-Manjarrez, S. Borghesi and P. Olin. Copies of FAO publications can be requested from: Sales and Marketing Group Office of Knowledge Exchange, Research and Extension Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations E-mail: [email protected] Fax: +39 06 57053360 Web site: www.fao.org/icatalog/inter-e.htm FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1061/2 FIRA/C1061/2 (En) Regional Review on Status and Trends in Aquaculture Development in North America: Canada and the United States of America — 2010 by Paul G. Olin California Sea Grant Scripps Institution of Oceanography University of California San Diego United States of America James Smith Aquaculture Management Directorate Fisheries and Oceans Canada Canada Rashed Nabi Aquaculture Management Directorate Fisheries and Oceans Canada Canada FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS ROME, 2011 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of FAO. E-ISBN 978-92-5-106895-3 (PDF) All rights reserved. FAO encourages reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Non-commercial uses will be authorized free of charge, upon request. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes, including educational purposes, may incur fees. Applications for permission to reproduce or disseminate FAO copyright materials, and all queries concerning rights and licences, should be addressed by e-mail to [email protected] or to the Chief, Publishing Policy and Support Branch, Office of Knowledge Exchange, Research and Extension, FAO, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy. © FAO 2011 iii PREPARATION OF THIS DOCUMENT The present Regional Review on Status and Trends in Aquaculture Development in North America was prepared as a collaborative effort of FAO’s Aquaculture Service (FIRA) and Paul Olin, James Smith and Rashed Nabi. The document was compiled and edited by Paul Olin. The authors greatly appreciate the contributions by the following experts: Ruth Salmon, Executive Director, Canadian Aquaculture Industry Alliance; Sherry Sadler, Project Manager, Canadian Aquaculture Industry Alliance; Angela Bexten, Assistant Director, Global Fisheries and Marine Governance Bureau, Fisheries and Oceans Canada; and Gloria Falk, Team Leader, Aquaculture Management Directorate, Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Additional contributions were provided by FAO colleagues, in particular José Aguilar-Manjarrez of FAO’s Aquaculture Service (FIRA) and Devin Bartley, Marine and Inland Fisheries Service (FIRF). Xiaowei Zhou from FAO’s Statistics and Information Service (FIPS) prepared the FAO aquaculture statistics presented in this review. Danielle Rizcallah and Lei Chen (FIRA) assisted in the completion of the final layout and formatting to standard FAO editorial guidelines. iv Olin, P., Smith, J. and Nabi, R. Regional Review on Status and Trends in Aquaculture Development in North America – 2010 FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1061/2. Rome, FAO. 2011. 84 pp. ABSTRACT The aquaculture industry in North America produced 644 213 tonnes of product in 2008 with an estimated value of US$1.6 billion. This represents an annual percentage increase over the previous decade of 1.8 percent by volume and 4.5 percent in value. The finfish industry is at the forefront of the aquaculture sector, led by production of Atlantic salmon in Canada and channel catfish in the United States of America. There is potential for significant increases in North American production and both the Canadian and United States governments have projections for expansion of their aquaculture industries. Canada estimates that by 2020 production in Canada could exceed 308 000 tonnes with a farmgate value of US$1.6 billion. The United States Department of Commerce estimates that domestic aquaculture production in the United States of America has the potential to increase in value from US$1 billion to more than US$3 billion by 2025. Future significant growth in the North American aquaculture industry will require policies and regulations that protect the environment while ensuring the economic viability of the sector in an increasingly competitive international arena. CONTENTS PREPARATION OF THIS DOCUMENT iii ABSTRACT iv TABLES vii FIGURES viii ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ix EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1. SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC BACKGROUND OF THE REGION 5 2. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SECTOR 9 2.1 Status and Trends 9 2.2 North American production and value 9 2.3 Canadian production and value 11 2.3.1 Salmon 14 2.3.2 Trout 16 2.3.3 Mussels 17 2.3.4 Oysters 17 2.4 United States of America production and value 18 2.4.1 Channel catfish 18 2.4.2 Shellfish production 19 2.5 Salient issues and success stories 22 2.6 The way forward 23 3. RESOURCES, SERVICES AND TECHNOLOGIES 25 3.1 Status and trends 25 3.1.1 Land and water 25 3.1.2 Seed 26 3.1.3 Biotechnology 28 3.1.4 Feed 29 3.1.5 Culture technologies 30 3.1.6 Aquatic animal health support 31 3.1.7 Capital 33 3.1.8 Insurance 34 3.2 Salient issues and success stories 35 3.3 The way forward 36 4. AQUACULTURE AND THE ENVIRONMENT 37 4.1 Status and trends 37 4.1.1 General environmental conditions 37 4.1.2 Health management 37 4.1.3 Alien species 40 4.1.4 Integrated aquaculture 41 vi 4.1.5 User conflicts 41 4.1.6 Public perception 43 4.2 Salient issues and success stories 44 4.3 The way forward 44 5. MARKETS AND TRADE 45 5.1 Status and trends 45 5.1.1 Canadian markets and trade 45 5.1.2 United States of America markets and trade 45 5.1.3 Food safety requirements 49 5.1.4 Certification, organic aquaculture 51 5.1.5 Social organization in marketing 52 5.1.6 Potential for increased demand for aquaculture products 52 5.2 Salient issues and success stories 52 5.3 The way forward 52 6. CONTRIBUTION OF AQUACULTURE TO FOOD SECURITY, SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 53 6.1 Status and trends 53 6.1.1 Aquaculture employment 53 6.1.2 Seafood consumption 55 6.2 Salient issues and success stories 56 6.3 The way forward 56 6.3.1 Farmers clusters 57 7. EXTERNAL PRESSURES ON THE SECTOR 59 7.1 Status and trends 59 7.1.1 Climate change 59 7.1.2 Coastal storms 59 7.1.3 Ocean acidification 59 7.1.4 Economics and fish health 60 7.2 Salient issues and success stories 61 7.3 The way forward 61 8. THE ROLE OF SHARED INFORMATION: RESEARCH, TRAINING, EXTENSION AND NETWORKING 63 8.1 Status and trends 63 8.1.1 North American aquaculture facilities 63 8.1.2 Canadian aquaculture initiatives 64 8.1.3 United States of America National Marine Aquaculture Initiative 65 8.1.4 Aquaculture networking 66 8.1.5 Canadian international conventions and treaties 67 8.1.6 United States of America international conventions and treaties 67 8.1.7 Indigenous aquaculture 70 vii 8.2 Salient issues and success stories 70 8.3 The way forward 70 9. GOVERNANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF THE SECTOR 73 9.1 Status and trends 73 9.1.1 Canadian aquaculture strategy 73 9.1.2 United States of America aquaculture strategy 75 9.2 Salient issues and success stories 76 9.3 The way forward 77 10. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BANGKOK DECLARATION 79 10.1 Investing in people through education and training 79 10.2 Investing in research and development 79 10.3 Improving information flow and communication 79 10.4 Improving environmental sustainability 79 10.5 Applying innovations in aquaculture 80 10.6 Applying genetics to aquaculture 80 10.7 Applying biotechnology 80 10.8 Improving food quality and safety 80 11. REFERENCES 81 TABLES Table 1: North American components of population growth, 2007. 6 Table 2: North American gross domestic product (GDP), growth and employment. 7 Table 3: Salmon production tonnes by province/region. 15 Table 4: Canadian Trout production, 1997–2008. 17 Table 5: Declines in catfish farm surface area and production in the United States of America. 19 Table 6: Different species farmed in Canada. 24 Table 7: Freshwater farming in the United States of America – area and primary states involved, 1998–2005. 26 Table 8: Saltwater farming in the United States of America – area and primary states involved, 1998–2005. 26 Table 9: Catfish feed utilization in the United States of America 2008, tonnes. 30 Table 10: Canadian aquaculture trade balance, US$1 000. 45 Table 11: States in the United States of America with aquaculture payroll exceeding US$10 million in 2005. 55 Table 12: Per capita seafood consumption in Canada, kg/person. 55 Table 13: Volume and value of salmon products exported to the United States of America by Canada and Chile.
Recommended publications
  • AU-COM2017-349 Date of Issue 27 April 2017 Date of Expiry 30 December 2019
    Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Regulations 2000 Access to Biological Resources in a Commonwealth Area for Non-Commercial Purposes Permit number AU-COM2017-349 Date of issue 27 April 2017 Date of expiry 30 December 2019 Name and organisation of person to Dr Alison King and Dion Wedd whom the permit is issued: Charles Darwin University c/-RIEL, S of Environment, Charles Darwin University, Ellengowan Drive, Brinkin NT 0909 Provision of Regulations for which permit issued 8A.06 Collection of biological material from Kakadu National Park – Charles Darwin University Access is permitted to the following location: Mary River, Kakadu National Park to collect the following biological resources for non-commercial purposes: a maximum of the following: Common Name Scientific Name Amount/ Volume Longfin glassfish Ambassis interrupta 20 Macleay's glassfish Ambassis macleayi 20 Vachell’s Glassfish Ambassis vachellii 20 Northwest glassfish Ambassis sp. 50 Barred Grunter Amniataba percoides 150 short fin eel Anguilla bicolor 20 Toothless catfish Anodontiglanis dahli 20 Snub-nosed garfish Arrhamphus sclerolepis 20 Freshwater sole Brachirus selheimi 20 Crimson-tipped gudgeon Butis butis 20 bull shark Carcharhinus leucas 20 smallmouth catfish Cinetodus frogatti 20 Fly-specked hardyhead Craterocephalus stercusmuscarum 20 Strawman hardyhead Craterocephalus stramineus 200 Anchovy sp. Engraulidae 20 silver biddy Gerres filamentosus 20 Mouth almighty Glossamia aprion 50 Permit Number: AU-COM2017-349 Page 1 of 4 Environment Protection and
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Aquaculture in the United States: Economic Considerations, Implications & Opportunities
    Offshore Aquaculture in the United States: Economic Considerations, Implications & Opportunities July 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration Silver Spring, Maryland NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS F/SPO-103 You may download an electronic version of this report from: http://aquaculture.noaa.gov This document should be cited as follows: Rubino, Michael (editor). 2008. Offshore Aquaculture in the United States: Economic Considerations, Implications & Opportunities. U.S. Department of Commerce; Silver Spring, MD; USA. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS F/SPO-103. 263 pages. For more information: NOAA Aquaculture Program 1315 East-West Hwy. SSMC #3 – Room 13117 Silver Spring MD 20910 (301) 713-9079 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://aquaculture.noaa.gov Offshore Aquaculture in the United States: Economic Considerations, Implications & Opportunities Prepared by the NOAA Aquaculture Program From technical contributions by James L. Anderson, John Forster, Di Jin, James E. Kirkley, Gunnar Knapp, Colin E. Nash, Michael Rubino, Gina L. Shamshak, Diego Valderrama NOAA Aquaculture Program 1315 East-West Hwy. SSMC #3 – Room 13117 Silver Spring MD 20910 July 2008 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Carlos M. Gutierrez, Secretary NATIONAL OCEANIC & ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION Vice Admiral Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr. USN (Ret.), Administrator NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE James Balsiger, Assistant Administrator for Fisheries This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction …………………………………………………………….. 1 Michael Rubino Chapter 2: Economic Potential for U.S. Offshore Aquaculture: An Analytical Approach ………………………………………………. 15 Gunnar Knapp Chapter 3: Emerging Technologies in Marine Aquaculture ……………………….. 51 John Forster Chapter 4: Future Aquaculture Feeds and Feed Costs: The Role of Fish Meal and Fish Oil …………………………………… 73 Gina Shamshak & James Anderson Chapter 5: Lessons from the Development of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of the King Edward River in the Kimberley Region, Western Australia
    Records of the Western Australian Museum 25: 351–368 (2010). Fishes of the King Edward River in the Kimberley region, Western Australia David L. Morgan Freshwater Fish Group, Centre for Fish and Fisheries Research, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract – The King Edward River, in the far north of the Kimberley region of Western Australia drains approximately 10,000 km2 and discharges into the Timor Sea near the town of Kalumburu. This study represents an ichthyological survey of the river’s freshwaters and revealed that the number of freshwater fishes of the King Edward River is higher than has previously been recorded for a Western Australian river. Twenty-six strictly freshwater fish species were recorded, which is three species higher than the much larger Fitzroy River in the southern Kimberley. The study also identified a number of range extensions, including Butler’s Grunter and Shovel-nosed Catfish to the west, and the Slender Gudgeon to the north and east. A possibly undescribed species of glassfish, that differs morphologically from described species in arrangement of head spines, fin rays, as well as relative body measurements, is reported. A considerable proportion of Jenkins’ Grunter, which is widespread throughout the system but essentially restricted to main channel sites, had ‘blubber-lips’. There were significant differences in the prevailing fish fauna of the different reaches of the King Edward River system. Thus fish associations in the upper King Edward River main channel were significantly different to those in the tributaries and the main channel of the Carson River.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries Guidelines for Design of Stream Crossings
    Fish Habitat Guideline FHG 001 FISH PASSAGE IN STREAMS Fisheries guidelines for design of stream crossings Elizabeth Cotterell August 1998 Fisheries Group DPI ISSN 1441-1652 Agdex 486/042 FHG 001 First published August 1998 Information contained in this publication is provided as general advice only. For application to specific circumstances, professional advice should be sought. The Queensland Department of Primary Industries has taken all reasonable steps to ensure the information contained in this publication is accurate at the time of publication. Readers should ensure that they make appropriate enquiries to determine whether new information is available on the particular subject matter. © The State of Queensland, Department of Primary Industries 1998 Copyright protects this publication. Except for purposes permitted by the Copyright Act, reproduction by whatever means is prohibited without the prior written permission of the Department of Primary Industries, Queensland. Enquiries should be addressed to: Manager Publishing Services Queensland Department of Primary Industries GPO Box 46 Brisbane QLD 4001 Fisheries Guidelines for Design of Stream Crossings BACKGROUND Introduction Fish move widely in rivers and creeks throughout Queensland and Australia. Fish movement is usually associated with reproduction, feeding, escaping predators or dispersing to new habitats. This occurs between marine and freshwater habitats, and wholly within freshwater. Obstacles to this movement, such as stream crossings, can severely deplete fish populations, including recreational and commercial species such as barramundi, mullet, Mary River cod, silver perch, golden perch, sooty grunter and Australian bass. Many Queensland streams are ephemeral (they may flow only during the wet season), and therefore crossings must be designed for both flood and drought conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Risk Assessment of Cane Toads in Kakadu National Park Scientist Report 164, Supervising Scientist, Darwin NT
    supervising scientist 164 report A preliminary risk assessment of cane toads in Kakadu National Park RA van Dam, DJ Walden & GW Begg supervising scientist national centre for tropical wetland research This report has been prepared by staff of the Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist (eriss) as part of our commitment to the National Centre for Tropical Wetland Research Rick A van Dam Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, Locked Bag 2, Jabiru NT 0886, Australia (Present address: Sinclair Knight Merz, 100 Christie St, St Leonards NSW 2065, Australia) David J Walden Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801, Australia George W Begg Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801, Australia This report should be cited as follows: van Dam RA, Walden DJ & Begg GW 2002 A preliminary risk assessment of cane toads in Kakadu National Park Scientist Report 164, Supervising Scientist, Darwin NT The Supervising Scientist is part of Environment Australia, the environmental program of the Commonwealth Department of Environment and Heritage © Commonwealth of Australia 2002 Supervising Scientist Environment Australia GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801 Australia ISSN 1325-1554 ISBN 0 642 24370 0 This work is copyright Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Supervising Scientist Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of the King Edward and Carson Rivers with Their Belaa and Ngarinyin Names
    Fishes of the King Edward and Carson Rivers with their Belaa and Ngarinyin names By David Morgan, Dolores Cheinmora Agnes Charles, Pansy Nulgit & Kimberley Language Resource Centre Freshwater Fish Group CENTRE FOR FISH & FISHERIES RESEARCH Kimberley Language Resource Centre Milyengki Carson Pool Dolores Cheinmora: Nyarrinjali, kaawi-lawu yarn’ nyerreingkana, Milyengki-ngûndalu. Waj’ nyerreingkana, kaawi-ku, kawii amûrike omûrung, yilarra a-mûrike omûrung. Agnes Charles: We are here at Milyengki looking for fish. He got one barramundi, a small one. Yilarra is the barramundi’s name. Dolores Cheinmora: Wardi-di kala’ angbûnkû naa? Agnes Charles: Can you see the fish, what sort of fish is that? Dolores Cheinmora: Anja kûkûridingei, Kalamburru-ngûndalu. Agnes Charles: This fish, the Barred Grunter, lives in the Kalumburu area. Title: Fishes of the King Edward and Carson Rivers with their Belaa and Ngarinyin names Authors: D. Morgan1 D. Cheinmora2, A. Charles2, Pansy Nulgit3 & Kimberley Language Resource Centre4 1Centre for Fish & Fisheries Research, Murdoch University, South St Murdoch WA 6150 2Kalumburu Aboriginal Corporation 3Kupungari Aboriginal Corporation 4Siobhan Casson, Margaret Sefton, Patsy Bedford, June Oscar, Vicki Butters - Kimberley Language Resource Centre, Halls Creek, PMB 11, Halls Creek WA 6770 Project funded by: Land & Water Australia Photographs on front cover: Lower King Edward River Long-nose Grunter (inset). July 2006 Land & Water Australia Project No. UMU22 Fishes of the King Edward River - Centre for Fish & Fisheries Research, Murdoch University / Kimberley Language Resource Centre 2 Acknowledgements Most importantly we would like to thank the people of the Kimberley, particularly the Traditional Owners at Kalumburu and Prap Prap. This project would not have been possible without the financial support of Land & Water Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX 1 Classified List of Fishes Mentioned in the Text, with Scientific and Common Names
    APPENDIX 1 Classified list of fishes mentioned in the text, with scientific and common names. ___________________________________________________________ Scientific names and classification are from Nelson (1994). Families are listed in the same order as in Nelson (1994), with species names following in alphabetical order. The common names of British fishes mostly follow Wheeler (1978). Common names of foreign fishes are taken from Froese & Pauly (2002). Species in square brackets are referred to in the text but are not found in British waters. Fishes restricted to fresh water are shown in bold type. Fishes ranging from fresh water through brackish water to the sea are underlined; this category includes diadromous fishes that regularly migrate between marine and freshwater environments, spawning either in the sea (catadromous fishes) or in fresh water (anadromous fishes). Not indicated are marine or freshwater fishes that occasionally venture into brackish water. Superclass Agnatha (jawless fishes) Class Myxini (hagfishes)1 Order Myxiniformes Family Myxinidae Myxine glutinosa, hagfish Class Cephalaspidomorphi (lampreys)1 Order Petromyzontiformes Family Petromyzontidae [Ichthyomyzon bdellium, Ohio lamprey] Lampetra fluviatilis, lampern, river lamprey Lampetra planeri, brook lamprey [Lampetra tridentata, Pacific lamprey] Lethenteron camtschaticum, Arctic lamprey] [Lethenteron zanandreai, Po brook lamprey] Petromyzon marinus, lamprey Superclass Gnathostomata (fishes with jaws) Grade Chondrichthiomorphi Class Chondrichthyes (cartilaginous
    [Show full text]
  • Movements of Forktail Catfish in the Daly River, Northern Territory, As Determined by Otolith Chemistry Analysis
    Movements of Forktail Catfish in the Daly River, Northern Territory, as Determined by Otolith Chemistry Analysis Thesis submitted by Sally Catherine Oughton (BSc/BComm) in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science with Honours in the School of Environmental and Life Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Health, Science and the Environment, Charles Darwin University. June 2014. Statement of Authorship I declare that this thesis is my own work and has not been submitted in any form for another degree or diploma at any university or other institute of tertiary education. Information derived from the published and unpublished work of others has been acknowledged in the text and a list of references given. Sally Catherine Oughton Cover Illustration: Daly River at Galloping Jacks (left), and an otolith section magnified under transmitted light. I Abstract Although the vast majority of fishes spend their entire lives in either fresh water or the sea, some are capable of moving across salinity gradients. “Diadromous” species migrate between fresh and salt water on a regular, well-defined basis, whereas “euryhaline” species move across salinity gradients freely and not necessarily at particular life history stages. These species are particularly vulnerable to anthropogenic developments that regulate flow and diminish connectivity between freshwater and marine biomes, such as the construction of dams and extraction of water for agricultural use. As a result, diadromous and euryhaline species are considered among the most threatened vertebrate groups in the world. Studying fish movement behaviour provides vital information on the importance of different aquatic habitats and species’ ecological roles, and improves environmental management outcomes for diadromous species.
    [Show full text]
  • The Salty Corner Meets the Year of the Catfish – Marine Catfish
    YYeeaarr ooff tthhee CCaattffiisshh A monthly column about Catfish The Salty Corner meets The Year of the Catfish: Marine Catfish By Derek P.S. Tustin So Klaus, recognizing something is missing in our club, has begun a new series of articles in Tank Talk on marine fishkeeping. I’ll admit I’ve been tempted at times to start up a saltwater tank, and I know that several members of our club have taken the leap in the last couple of years. I’ve been reading Klaus’ new selection of articles, published under the name The Salty Corner, with some interest. In doing so, and considering the research I’ve been doing for our Year of the Catfish, I got to wondering, “Are there any marine catfish?” Short answer is yes. Realistic answer is a bit more complicated. It appears that there is no family of catfish wherein all members of the family are marine Plotosus lineatus catfish. But there are two families of catfish, Ariidae and Plotosidae, where some species of the family are indeed brackish and marine. Ariidae Ariidae is a family of catfish that encompass marine, brackish and freshwater species, with the majority of the species being from marine habitats. As a group they are called “Sea Catfish” and are found in the tropical to sub-tropical zones of North America, South America, Africa, Asia and Australia (being absent from both Europe and Antarctica). There are about 30 genera in the Ariidae family encompassing approximately 150 species. They usually have a deeply forked caudal fin, three pairs of barbels, and bony plates on their heads and near their dorsal fins.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Fish and Aquatic Habitat Survey of Cape York Peninsula
    CAPE YORK PENINSULA NATURAL RESOURCES ANALYSIS PROGRAM (NRAP) FRESHWATER FISH AND AQUATIC HABITAT SURVEY OF CAPE YORK PENINSULA B. W. Herbert, J.A. Peeters, P.A. Graham and A.E. Hogan Freshwater Fisheries and Aquaculture Centre Queensland Department of Primary Industries 1995 CYPLUS is a joint initiative of the Queensland and Commonwealth Governments CAPE YORK PENINSULA LAND USE STRATEGY (CYPLUS) Natural Resources Analysis Program FRESHWATER FISH AND AQUATIC HABITAT SURVEY OF CAPE YORK PENINSULA B. W. Herbert, J. A. Peeters, P.A. Graham and A.E. Hogan Freshwater Fisheries and Aquaculture Centre Queensland Department of Primary Industries 1995 CYPLUS is a joint initiative of the Queensland and Commonwealth Governments Final report on project: NRlO - FISH FAUNA SURVEY Recommended citation: Herbert, B.W., Peeters, J.A., Graham, P.A. and Hogan, A.E. (1995). 'Freshwater Fish and Aquatic Habitat Survey of Cape York Peninsula'. (Cape York Peninsula Land Use Strategy, Office of the Co-ordinator General of Queensland, Brisbane, Department of the Environment, Sport and Territories, Canberra, Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Brisbane.) Note: Due to the timing of publication, reports on other CYPLUS projects may not be fully cited in the REFERENCES section. However, they should be able to be located by author, agency or subject. ISBN 0 7242 6204 0 The State of Queensland and Commonwealth of Australia 1995. Copyright protects this publication. Except for purposes permitted by the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any means without the prior written permission of the Office of the Co-ordinator General of Queensland and the Australian Government Publishing Service.
    [Show full text]
  • The Living Planet Index (Lpi) for Migratory Freshwater Fish Technical Report
    THE LIVING PLANET INDEX (LPI) FOR MIGRATORY FRESHWATER FISH LIVING PLANET INDEX TECHNICAL1 REPORT LIVING PLANET INDEXTECHNICAL REPORT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are very grateful to a number of individuals and organisations who have worked with the LPD and/or shared their data. A full list of all partners and collaborators can be found on the LPI website. 2 INDEX TABLE OF CONTENTS Stefanie Deinet1, Kate Scott-Gatty1, Hannah Rotton1, PREFERRED CITATION 2 1 1 Deinet, S., Scott-Gatty, K., Rotton, H., Twardek, W. M., William M. Twardek , Valentina Marconi , Louise McRae , 5 GLOSSARY Lee J. Baumgartner3, Kerry Brink4, Julie E. Claussen5, Marconi, V., McRae, L., Baumgartner, L. J., Brink, K., Steven J. Cooke2, William Darwall6, Britas Klemens Claussen, J. E., Cooke, S. J., Darwall, W., Eriksson, B. K., Garcia Eriksson7, Carlos Garcia de Leaniz8, Zeb Hogan9, Joshua de Leaniz, C., Hogan, Z., Royte, J., Silva, L. G. M., Thieme, 6 SUMMARY 10 11, 12 13 M. L., Tickner, D., Waldman, J., Wanningen, H., Weyl, O. L. Royte , Luiz G. M. Silva , Michele L. Thieme , David Tickner14, John Waldman15, 16, Herman Wanningen4, Olaf F., Berkhuysen, A. (2020) The Living Planet Index (LPI) for 8 INTRODUCTION L. F. Weyl17, 18 , and Arjan Berkhuysen4 migratory freshwater fish - Technical Report. World Fish Migration Foundation, The Netherlands. 1 Indicators & Assessments Unit, Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society 11 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION of London, United Kingdom Edited by Mark van Heukelum 11 Data set 2 Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Design Shapeshifter.nl Biology and Institute of Environmental Science, Carleton University, Drawings Jeroen Helmer 12 Global trend Ottawa, ON, Canada 15 Tropical and temperate zones 3 Institute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University, Albury, Photography We gratefully acknowledge all of the 17 Regions New South Wales, Australia photographers who gave us permission 20 Migration categories 4 World Fish Migration Foundation, The Netherlands to use their photographic material.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquaculture. Teacher Edition. INSTTJTON Mid-America Vocational Curriculum Consortium, Stillwater, Okla
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 327 657 CE 056 667 AUTHOR Walker, Susan S. TITLE Aquaculture. Teacher Edition. INSTTJTON Mid-America Vocational Curriculum Consortium, Stillwater, Okla. PUB DATE 90 NOTE 876p. AVAILABLr FROMMid-America 7ocational Curriculum Consortium, 1500 West Seventh Avenue, Stillwater, OK 74074 (order no. CN601501: $38.50). PUB TYPE Guides - Classroom Use Guides (For Teachers) (052) EDRS PRICE MF06 Plus Postage. PC Not Available from EDRS. DESCRIPTORS *Agricultural Production; Behavioral Objectives; Business Administration; *Equipment; *Fisheries; Learning Activities; Lesson Plans; Marine Biology; Postsecondary Education; Secondary Education; Teaching Methods; Test Items; Units of Study; *Water Quality IDENTIFIERS *Aquaculture ABSTRACT This color-coded guide was developed to assist teachers in helping interested students plan, build, stock, and run aquaculture facilities of varied sizes. The guide contains 15 instructional units, each of which includes some or all of the following basic components: objective sheet, suggested activities for the teacher, instructor supplements, transparency masters, information sheet, assignment sheets, assignment sheet answers, job sheets, practical tests, written test, and answers to written test. Units cover the following topics: introduction to aquaculture; the aquatic environment; fundamental fish biology; marketing; site selection; facility design and layout; water quality management; fish health management; commercial catfish production; commercial trout production; commercial baitfish production; commercial crayfish production; other commercial species; harvesting and hauling; and business management. All of the units focus on measurable and observable learning outcomes. They are designed for use in more than one lesson or class period of instruction. (KC) *******x*******X******************************X************************ Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document.
    [Show full text]