DOCSLIB.ORG

Implications of Climate Change for Australia's World Heritage Propertiesl: a Preliminary Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

IMPLICATIONS OF CLIMATE CHANGE FOR AUSTRALIA’S WORLD HERITAGE PROPERTIES: A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT IMPLICATIONS OF CLIMATE CHANGE FOR AUSTRALIA’S WORLD HERITAGE PROPERTIES: A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT IMPLICATIONS OF CLIMATE CHANGE FOR AUSTRALIA’S WORLD HERITAGE PROPERTIES: A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT A report to the DEPARTMENT OF CLIMATE CHANGE and the DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT, WATER, HERITAGE AND THE ARTS. Prepared by The Australian National University The Australian National University cannot accept any responsibility for any use of or reliance on the contents of this report by any third party. Image Credits Cover 1 Subtropical rainforest in Lamington National Park, Paul Candlin and the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. 2 Indigenous Rock Art site, Tom Smith and the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. 3 King Penguins on Heard Island, G. Budd and the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. 4 Dugongs, Lochman Transparencies. Title Pages p.1 Leura Cascades Blue Mountains National Park, Mark Mohell and the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. p.43 Royal Penguins at The Nugget, Macquarie Island, Noel Carmichael and the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. © Commonwealth of Australia 2009 ISBN: [978-0-9806342-0-4] Format: Paperback Publication Date: 12/2008 Recommended Retail Price: $0.00 This report is also available online at <www.environment.gov.au>. ISBN: [978-0-9806342-2-8] Format: Online Publication Date: 12/2008 Recommended Retail Price: $0.00 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth, available from the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to: Assistant Secretary International Heritage and Policy Branch Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts GPO Box 787 CANBERRA ACT 2601 Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or the Minister for Climate Change and Water and the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts. Note on the names of departments referenced in this report Name changes to the Australian Government’s environment department have occurred over the past several years. This report refers to: • The Department of the Environment and Heritage (DEH)—former name • The Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts (DEWHA)—current name • The Department of Climate Change—current name (part of which was formerly the Australian Greenhouse Office in DEH) Citation The report should be cited as: Australian National University (2009) Implications of climate change for Australia’s World Heritage properties: A preliminary assessment. A report to the Department of Climate Change and the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts by the Fenner School of Environment and Society, the Australian National University. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The ANU Fenner School of Environment and Society thanks the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts for the opportunity to undertake this project. We particularly acknowledge the cooperation, engagement, feedback and contributions made by Liz Dovey, Anna van Dugteren and Anne-Marie Wilson from the Department of Climate Change and Bruce Wellington, Ken Heffernan, Veronica Blazely, Madeleine Maple and Megan Smith from the Heritage Division of the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. We also wish to acknowledge the contributions made by Lance Heath, Will Steffen and Bruce Arnold of the ANU Climate Change Institute (formerly the ANU Institute for Environment). Many people contributed to this project and report through discussions, comments on early drafts and provision of written material. Comments and contributions on the World Heritage properties were received from Tony Auld, Jane Balmer, Linda Beaumont, Dana Bergstrom, Corey Bradshaw, Ross Bradstock, Dick Braithwaite, Adam Britton, Virginia Chadwick, Bob Conroy, Bart Currie, John Day, Michael Driessen, Max Finlayson, Marc Hockings, David Hilbert, Angela Hill, Harry Hines, Ove Hoegh-Guldberg, Ian Houshold, Lesley Hughes, John Hunter, Stephen Goosem, Kate Hammill, David Jones, Kate Kiefer, Karen King, Roger Kitching, Adam Leavesley, W J F McDonald, Michael Mahony, Paul Marshall, John Merson, Joe Morrison, Bronwyn Ness, Peter Ogilvie, Michael Pemberton, David Priddel, Sarah Pizzey, Lynda Prior, Don Sands, Peter Sharp, Stephen Swearer, Ray Tonkin, Paul Tregoning, Steve Turton, Peter Waterman, Ian White and Eric Woehler. Apologies if anyone has been missed. We are very appreciative of all your contributions. iii IMPLICATIONS OF CLIMATE CHANGE FOR AUSTRALIA’S WORLD HERITAGE PROPERTIES: A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT iv PREFACE BY THE AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT World Heritage properties are important to all people and have a universal value that transcends national boundaries. Australia’s 17 World Heritage properties include the largest World Heritage property, the Great Barrier Reef, extensive natural and Indigenous places like Kakadu National Park, isolated marine and terrestrial areas such as Macquarie Island, and Sydney Opera House, an architectural masterpiece. Climate changes such as sea level rise, reduced rainfall and higher temperatures are expected to threaten the resilience of our World Heritage properties, exacerbating issues such as habitat loss and degradation, spread of invasive species and changing fire regimes. Committed to protecting the values of Australia’s World Heritage properties, in 2006 the Australian Government asked the Australian National University to assess the exposure, potential impacts, vulnerability and adaptive capacity of our World Heritage properties to climate change and to identify major knowledge gaps. This resulting report will inform management plans and government policy on World Heritage and climate change adaptation into the future. Some of our World Heritage properties have already embarked on far-sighted initiatives to manage the effects of climate change. For example, the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority has completed a detailed vulnerability assessment and is implementing an $8.9 million Climate Change Action Plan, and a $200 million Reef Rescue Plan, funded by the Australian Government. A range of other Australian Government and intergovernmental studies and initiatives are contributing to our understanding of the risks posed to biodiversity and natural landscapes from climate change. The National Climate Change Adaptation Framework is the basis for government action on adaptation over the next five to seven years, and it includes actions to assist the most vulnerable sectors and regions of the country. $126 million has been provided towards the implementation of the framework, including the establishment of a Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility, which will lead Australia’s researchers in generating robust biophysical, social and economic information that decision makers need to manage the risk of climate change. One of the first countries to ratify the World Heritage Convention in 1974, Australia is committed to helping other countries protect World Heritage. Keen to share our skills and experience on World Heritage and climate change, in 2007 we provided significant input and guidance on the World Heritage Convention’s Climate Change Policy. Our election to the World Heritage Committee in 2007 for a four-year term provides further opportunities for collaboration. v IMPLICATIONS OF CLIMATE CHANGE FOR AUSTRALIA’S WORLD HERITAGE PROPERTIES: A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT vi CONTENTS Acknowledgements iii Preface by the Australian Government v Executive summary xi PART 1—SYNTHESIS OF IMPLICATIONS OF CLIMATE CHANGE FOR AUSTRALIA’S WORLD HERITAGE PROPERTIES 1 1. Introduction 3 1.1 Scope of the report 3 1.2 What is a World Heritage property? 4 1.3 Climate change scenarios for 2030 7 2. Important aspects of climate change for World Heritage properties 9 2.1 Australian impacts 9 3. Summary of potential impacts of climate change on Australia’s World Heritage properties and values 21 3.1 Potential impacts on natural heritage values 21 3.2 Potential impacts on cultural heritage values 27 4. Flow-on effects for industry and society 31 5. Adaptation to impacts 33 6. Key findings and recommendations 35 6.1 Opportunities for mitigation 35 6.2 Adaptation and management 35 6.3 Creating and sharing knowledge 36 7. Bibliography—Executive Summary and Part 1 39 PART 2—SYNTHESIS OF IMPLICATIONS OF CLIMATE CHANGE FOR EACH OF AUSTRALIA’S WORLD HERITAGE PROPERTIES 43 8. Climate change impacts on Australia’s World Heritage properties 45 8.1 Kakadu National Park 45 8.2 Great Barrier Reef 53 8.3 Willandra Lakes Region 65 8.4 Lord Howe Island Group 70 8.5 Tasmanian Wilderness 79 8.6 Gondwana Rainforests of Australia 95 8.7 Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park 103 8.8 Wet Tropics of Queensland 106 8.9 Shark Bay, Western Australia 119 8.10 Fraser Island 125 8.11 Australian Fossil Mammal Sites (Riversleigh/Naracoorte) 130 8.12 Heard and McDonald Islands 133 8.13 Macquarie Island 140 8.14 Greater Blue Mountains Area 146 8.15 Purnululu National Park 153 8.16 Royal Exhibition Building and Carlton Gardens 157 8.17 Sydney Opera House 161 vii IMPLICATIONS OF CLIMATE CHANGE FOR AUSTRALIA’S
Recommended publications
  • Known Impacts of Tropical Cyclones, East Coast, 1858 – 2008 by Mr Jeff Callaghan Retired Senior Severe Weather Forecaster, Bureau of Meteorology, Brisbane

    Known Impacts of Tropical Cyclones, East Coast, 1858 – 2008 by Mr Jeff Callaghan Retired Senior Severe Weather Forecaster, Bureau of Meteorology, Brisbane

    ARCHIVE: Known Impacts of Tropical Cyclones, East Coast, 1858 – 2008 By Mr Jeff Callaghan Retired Senior Severe Weather Forecaster, Bureau of Meteorology, Brisbane The date of the cyclone refers to the day of landfall or the day of the major impact if it is not a cyclone making landfall from the Coral Sea. The first number after the date is the Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) for that month followed by the three month running mean of the SOI centred on that month. This is followed by information on the equatorial eastern Pacific sea surface temperatures where: W means a warm episode i.e. sea surface temperature (SST) was above normal; C means a cool episode and Av means average SST Date Impact January 1858 From the Sydney Morning Herald 26/2/1866: an article featuring a cruise inside the Barrier Reef describes an expedition’s stay at Green Island near Cairns. “The wind throughout our stay was principally from the south-east, but in January we had two or three hard blows from the N to NW with rain; one gale uprooted some of the trees and wrung the heads off others. The sea also rose one night very high, nearly covering the island, leaving but a small spot of about twenty feet square free of water.” Middle to late Feb A tropical cyclone (TC) brought damaging winds and seas to region between Rockhampton and 1863 Hervey Bay. Houses unroofed in several centres with many trees blown down. Ketch driven onto rocks near Rockhampton. Severe erosion along shores of Hervey Bay with 10 metres lost to sea along a 32 km stretch of the coast.
  • 6. Annual Review and Significant Events

    6. Annual Review and Significant Events

    6. Annual Review and Significant Events January-April: wet in the tropics and WA, very hot in central to eastern Australia For northern Australia, the tropical wet season (October 2005 – April 2006) was the fifth wettest on record, with an average of 674 mm falling over the period. The monsoon trough was somewhat late in arriving over the Top End (mid-January as opposed to the average of late December), but once it had become established, widespread heavy rain featured for the next four months, except over the NT and Queensland in February. One particularly noteworthy event occurred towards the end of January when an intense low (central pressure near 990 hPa) on the monsoon trough, drifted slowly westward across the central NT generating large quantities of rain. A two-day deluge of 482 mm fell at Supplejack in the Tanami Desert (NT), resulting in major flooding over the Victoria River catchment. A large part of the central NT had its wettest January on record. Widespread areas of above average rain in WA were mainly due to the passages of several decaying tropical cyclones, and to a lesser extent southward incursions of tropical moisture interacting with mid-latitude systems. Severe tropical cyclone Clare crossed the Pilbara coast on 9t h January and then moved on a southerly track across the western fringes of WA as a rain depression. Significant flooding occurred around Lake Grace where 226 mm of rain fell in a 24-hour period from 12 t h to 13 t h January. Tropical cyclone Emma crossed the Pilbara coast on 28 th February and moved on a southerly track; very heavy rain fell in the headwaters of the Murchison River on 1s t March causing this river’s highest flood on record.
  • Summary of 2005/6 Australian-Region Tropical Storm Season and Verification of Authors’ Seasonal Forecasts

    Summary of 2005/6 Australian-Region Tropical Storm Season and Verification of Authors’ Seasonal Forecasts

    Summary of 2005/6 Australian-Region Tropical Storm Season and Verification of Authors’ Seasonal Forecasts Issued: 15th May 2006 by Professor Mark Saunders and Dr Adam Lea Benfield Hazard Research Centre, UCL (University College London), UK. Summary ¢¡¤£¦¥¨§¨§¨© £¨¨ £¨£¨ ¨£"!$#%¨&('(¨)¨'*+%,¨-'(.¨&/%¨01¨.%'23'(%546¨7+£¨ ¤£¨ ¨£8!$#%¨&('(¨9&*¨¤7:¨&(&*'( ;¨.%'23'*%54=<3 ¢¡¤'*>.¨¤%¨%?@'(%¡9%¡£A:B¨#A-,£C3'(¨#/!$#%¨&('(¨ %,¨-¤'*.¨&%¨0D£¨¨E@¡'(.¡F¨&(&3¡¤¨7F)£&(,@£¨ ¨£"¨.%'23'(%54¨<G ¢¡£" ¢HIJ%£,.'(&(£K-,¨)¤¨)'(&*'(%54 :B¨,£.¨%¦:L¨M%¡¤£¥¨§¨§¨© N £¨¨O¡,@£7P£Q¨.£&*&(£%$R¤'*&(&(ST-,£7'(.%'( :,¨0VUW 4X¥¨§¨§¨©+%¡¨% !K#%¨&('*¨ )¨'( ¨7 &(¨7¤:¨&*&('( Y¨.%'Z3'(%54Y[¨#&(7 )£\.&*¨£\%Y£¨ ¨£<X ¢¡¤£] ¢H¤I 7¤£%£0^'*¤'*%'*.¦:B¨,£.¨%A¡,@£76 ¨¨¨76R¤'*&(&_:B¨;)¤¨'(`¨.%'23'(%54a¨76:B¨¦&*¨¤7:¨&(&*'( M%,¨-'(.¨& %¨0b¤#0^)£_:,¨0bUc 4d¥¨§¨§¨©¨< egf3hejilk m3n(opqsr=t k iu1vKn(wyxOze{r|vK}$ok ~3wk it nZ¨u1m¨ilhwh~¨tNw@pFwy¨u[upiOk¨st(f3h¨¨¨ ^"3wyt(ilpq(n*p~3 ilh,¨n(k ~;t*ilk m3n(opqwtNk iyuwhpwk ~9p~3¦p8gpq(n(¨pt n(k ~k¨t(f3hniwhpwk ~3pqm¨ilk 3p3n(q*n(wyt n(oAp~3¦¨ht hiunZ~3n(wyt n*o k ilhopwyt w>k i?t(f3n(w>potNn 3nZt*¨¤egf3hwh$k ilhopwyt w{@hilh$n*wwy3hKuk ~¨t(f3qZ95ilk ut*f3h$ t(f¦Wp9¨¨¨ "tNk"t*f3h t(f@hohu[3hi8¨¨¨ p~3nZ~3oqZ3¨hKwhm3pilptNhTm¨ilh¨n(otNn(k ~3wsk i{~¨¨u3hilwsk¨¤t*ilk m3n(opqwyt k iuw~¨¨u[3hilw k¨¢wh¤hilh t(ilk m3n(opq¡oC3oq(k ~3hw"p~3¢t(f3h A£E¤¥z5@oo¨u3q(ptNh^£E3oq*k ~3h¦¤¡~3hi 3}snZ~3¨h§3egf3h[q*pt(tNhiKn(w ¨n ¤h~dk i¨t*f3h/"f3k¨q(h/"3wyt(ilpq*n(p~35ilh ¨n(k ~3 Features of the 2005/6 Australian-Region Season • The 2005/6 Australian-region tropical storm season featured 11 storms of which 7 made severe tropical cyclone strength (U.S.
  • Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 2006

    Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 2006

    Queensland Nature Conservation Act 1992 Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 2006 Current as at 1 September 2017 Queensland Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 2006 Contents Page Part 1 Preliminary 1 Short title . 5 2 Commencement . 5 3 Purpose . 5 4 Definitions . 6 5 Scientific names . 6 Part 2 Classes of native wildlife and declared management intent for the wildlife Division 1 Extinct in the wild wildlife 6 Native wildlife that is extinct in the wild wildlife . 7 7 Declared management intent for extinct in the wild wildlife . 8 8 Significance of extinct in the wild wildlife to nature and its value 8 9 Proposed management intent for extinct in the wild wildlife . 8 10 Principles for the taking, keeping or use of extinct in the wild wildlife 9 Division 2 Endangered wildlife 11 Native wildlife that is endangered wildlife . 10 12 Declared management intent for endangered wildlife . 10 13 Significance of endangered wildlife to nature and its value . 10 14 Proposed management intent for endangered wildlife . 11 15 Principles for the taking, keeping or use of endangered wildlife . 12 Division 3 Vulnerable wildlife 16 Native wildlife that is vulnerable wildlife . 13 17 Declared management intent for vulnerable wildlife . 13 18 Significance of vulnerable wildlife to nature and its value . 13 19 Proposed management intent for vulnerable wildlife . 14 20 Principles for the taking, keeping or use of vulnerable wildlife . 15 Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 2006 Contents Division 4 Near threatened wildlife 26 Native wildlife that is near threatened wildlife . 16 27 Declared management intent for near threatened wildlife . 16 28 Significance of near threatened wildlife to nature and its value .
  • Habitat Conservation Plan a Plan for the Protection of the Perdido Key

    Habitat Conservation Plan a Plan for the Protection of the Perdido Key

    Perdido Key Programmatic Habitat Conservation Plan Escambia County, Florida HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN A PLAN FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE PERDIDO KEY BEACH MOUSE, SEA TURTLES, AND PIPING PLOVERS ON PERDIDO KEY, FLORIDA Prepared in Support of Incidental Take Permit No. for Incidental Take Related to Private Development and Escambia County Owned Land and Infrastructure Improvements on Perdido Key, Florida Prepared for: ESCAMBIA COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS P.O. BOX 1591 PENSACOLA, FL 32591 Prepared by: PBS&J 2401 EXECUTIVE PLAZA, SUITE 2 PENSACOLA, FLORIDA 32504 Submitted to: U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE ECOLOGICAL SERVICES & FISHERIES RESOURCES OFFICE 1601 BALBOA AVENUE PANAMA CITY, FLORIDA 32450 Final Draft January 2010 Draft Submitted December 2008 Draft Revised March 2009 Draft Revised May 2009 Draft Revised October 2009 ii Perdido Key Programmatic Habitat Conservation Plan Escambia County, Florida TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................ viii LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ x LIST OF APPENDICES ................................................................................................. xi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................ xii 1.0 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background
  • Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests?

    Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests?

    Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests? An Analysis of the State of the Nation’s Regional Forest Agreements Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests? An Analysis of the State of the Nation’s Regional Forest Agreements The Wilderness Society. 2020, Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests? The State of the Nation’s RFAs, The Wilderness Society, Melbourne, Australia Table of contents 4 Executive summary Printed on 100% recycled post-consumer waste paper 5 Key findings 6 Recommendations Copyright The Wilderness Society Ltd 7 List of abbreviations All material presented in this publication is protected by copyright. 8 Introduction First published September 2020. 9 1. Background and legal status 12 2. Success of the RFAs in achieving key outcomes Contact: [email protected] | 1800 030 641 | www.wilderness.org.au 12 2.1 Comprehensive, Adequate, Representative Reserve system 13 2.1.1 Design of the CAR Reserve System Cover image: Yarra Ranges, Victoria | mitchgreenphotos.com 14 2.1.2 Implementation of the CAR Reserve System 15 2.1.3 Management of the CAR Reserve System 16 2.2 Ecologically Sustainable Forest Management 16 2.2.1 Maintaining biodiversity 20 2.2.2 Contributing factors to biodiversity decline 21 2.3 Security for industry 22 2.3.1 Volume of logs harvested 25 2.3.2 Employment 25 2.3.3 Growth in the plantation sector of Australia’s wood products industry 27 2.3.4 Factors contributing to industry decline 28 2.4 Regard to relevant research and projects 28 2.5 Reviews 32 3. Ability of the RFAs to meet intended outcomes into the future 32 3.1 Climate change 32 3.1.1 The role of forests in climate change mitigation 32 3.1.2 Climate change impacts on conservation and native forestry 33 3.2 Biodiversity loss/resource decline 33 3.2.1 Altered fire regimes 34 3.2.2 Disease 35 3.2.3 Pest species 35 3.3 Competing forest uses and values 35 3.3.1 Water 35 3.3.2 Carbon credits 36 3.4 Changing industries, markets and societies 36 3.5 International and national agreements 37 3.6 Legal concerns 37 3.7 Findings 38 4.
  • Approved NSW & National Recovery Plan Eidothea Hardeniana

    Approved NSW & National Recovery Plan Eidothea Hardeniana

    Approved NSW & National Recovery Plan Eidothea hardeniana September 2004 © Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW), July 2004. This work is copyright. However, material presented in this plan may be copied for personal use or published for educational purposes, providing that any extracts are fully acknowledged. Apart from this and any other use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced without prior written permission from NSW Department of Environment and Conservation. NSW Department of Environment and Conservation 43 Bridge Street (PO Box 1967) Hurstville NSW 2220 Tel: 02 9585 6444 www.nationalparks.nsw.gov.au Requests for information or comments regarding the recovery program for the Nightcap Oak are best directed to: The Nightcap Oak Recovery Co-ordinator Threatened Species Unit, North East Branch NSW Department of Environment and Conservation Locked Bag 914 Coffs Harbour NSW 2450 Tel: 02 6651 5946 Cover illustrator: Lesley Elkan © Botanic Gardens Trust, Sydney Cover illustration: Adult and juvenile leaves and fruit of Eidothea hardeniana This plan should be cited as follows: NSW Department of Environment and Conservation 2004, Recovery Plan for the Nightcap Oak (Eidothea hardeniana), Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW), Hurstville. ISBN 0 7313 6781 2 Recovery Plan The Nightcap Oak Recovery Plan for the Nightcap Oak (Eidothea hardeniana) Foreword The New South Wales Government established a new environment agency on 24 September 2003, the Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW), which incorporates the New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service. Responsibility for the preparation of Recovery Plans now rests with this new department. This document constitutes the New South Wales State and National Recovery Plan for Eidothea hardeniana Weston & Kooyman (Nightcap Oak), and as such considers the conservation requirements of the species across its range.
  • Final Determination Under the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016

    Final Determination Under the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016

    New South Wales Final Determination under the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 The Scientific Committee established under the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 has made a final determination to amend the list of species and ecological communities in Schedules 1, 2 and 3 to the Act. Accordingly, that Act is amended as follows— (a) Schedule 1, Part 1, Division 1 (under the heading Amphibians), is amended by omitting the matter from Column 1 and inserting instead the matter from Column 2— Column 1 Column 2 * Litoria piperata * Litoria piperata Tyler & Davis, 1985 Tyler & Davies, 1985 (b) Schedule 1, Part 1, Division 1 (under the heading Birds), is amended by omitting the matter from Column 1 and inserting instead the matter from Column 2— Column 1 Column 2 * Thinornis Hooded Plover * Thinornis Eastern Hooded rubricollis (Gmelin, cucullatus Dotterel, Eastern 1789) cucullatus (Vieillot, Hooded Plover 1818) (c) Schedule 1, Part 1, Division 1 (under the heading Insecta), is amended by omitting the matter from Column 1 and inserting instead the matter from Column 2— Column 1 Column 2 Phasmatodea Phasmida (d) Schedule 1, Part 1, Division 2 (under the heading Plants), is amended by omitting the matter from Column 1 and inserting instead the matter from Column 2— Published LW 12 February 2021 (2021 No 38) Final Determination [NSW] Column 1 Column 2 * Pultenaea elusa * Pultenaea elusa (J.D. Briggs & (J.D.Briggs & Crisp) R.P.J. de Kok Crisp) de Kok * Gentiana * Gentiana wingecarribiensis wingecarribiensis L. Adams L.G.Adams Prasophyllum sp. Prasophyllum Majors Creek sandrae D.L.Jones (Jones 11084) * Pomaderris * Pomaderris delicata N.G.
  • Remotely Monitoring Change in Vegetation Cover on the Montebello Islands, Western Australia, in Response to Introduced Rodent Eradication

    Remotely Monitoring Change in Vegetation Cover on the Montebello Islands, Western Australia, in Response to Introduced Rodent Eradication

    RESEARCH ARTICLE Remotely Monitoring Change in Vegetation Cover on the Montebello Islands, Western Australia, in Response to Introduced Rodent Eradication Cheryl Lohr1*, Ricky Van Dongen2, Bart Huntley2, Lesley Gibson3, Keith Morris1 1. Department of Parks and Wildlife, Science and Conservation Division, Woodvale, Western Australia, Australia, 2. Department of Parks and Wildlife, GIS Section, Kensington, Western Australia, Australia, 3. Department of Parks and Wildlife, Science and Conservation Division, Keiran McNamara Conservation Science Centre, 17 Dick Perry Drive, Technology Park, Kensington, WA 6151, Australia *[email protected] OPEN ACCESS Citation: Lohr C, Van Dongen R, Huntley B, Gibson L, Morris K (2014) Remotely Monitoring Abstract Change in Vegetation Cover on the Montebello Islands, Western Australia, in Response to The Montebello archipelago consists of 218 islands; 80 km from the north-west Introduced Rodent Eradication. PLoS ONE 9(12): e114095. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0114095 coast of Western Australia. Before 1912 the islands had a diverse terrestrial fauna. Editor: Benjamin Lee Allen, University of By 1952 several species were locally extinct. Between 1996 and 2011 rodents and Queensland, Australia cats were eradicated, and 5 mammal and 2 bird species were translocated to the Received: September 16, 2014 islands. Monitoring of the broader terrestrial ecosystem over time has been limited. Accepted: October 29, 2014 We used 20 dry-season Landsat images from 1988 to 2013 and estimation of green Published: December 1, 2014 fraction cover in nadir photographs taken at 27 sites within the Montebello islands Copyright: ß 2014 Lohr et al. This is an open- and six sites on Thevenard Island to assess change in vegetation density over time.
  • The Discovery of 2,5-Dialkylcyclohexan-1,3-Diones As a New Class of Natural Products

    The Discovery of 2,5-Dialkylcyclohexan-1,3-Diones As a New Class of Natural Products

    The discovery of 2,5-dialkylcyclohexan-1,3-diones as a new class of natural products S. Frankea, F. Ibarraa, C. M. Schulza, R. Twelea, J. Poldyb, R. A. Barrowb, R. Peakallc, F. P. Schiestld, and W. Franckea,1 aDepartment of Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, University of Hamburg, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 6, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany; bDepartment of Chemistry and cDepartment of Botany and Zoology, School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia; and dInstitute of Systematic Botany, University of Zu¨rich, Zollikerstrasse 107, CH-8008 Zu¨rich, Switzerland Edited by Jerrold Meinwald, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, and approved March 31, 2009 (received for review January 22, 2009) Orchids employing sexual deceit attract males of their pollinator candidate compounds, followed by coupled gas chromatography/ species through specific volatile signals that mimic female-released mass spectrometry (GC/MS) to determine their chemical struc- sex pheromones. One of these signals proved to be 2-ethyl-5- tures. Confirmation of biological activity with synthetic com- propylcyclohexan-1,3-dione (chiloglottone1), a new natural prod- pounds during field bioassays was the final essential step (11–13). uct that was shown to be most important in the relations between A milestone in the understanding of thynnine wasp phero- orchids of the genus Chiloglottis, native to Australia, and corre- mones and the attractive principles of orchids that mimic them sponding pollinator species. Systematic investigations on the mass has been the identification of 2-ethyl-5-propylcyclohexan-1,3- spectrometric fragmentation pattern of 2,5-dialkylcyclohexan-1,3- dione, chiloglottone1, formerly called chiloglottone, as the de- diones identified key ions providing information about the struc- cisive compound involved in the chemical mimicry used by tures of the substituents at positions 2 and 5.
  • EPBC Protected Matters Database Search Results

    EPBC Protected Matters Database Search Results

    FLORA AND FAUNA TECHNICAL REPORT Gold Coast Quarry EIS ATTACHMENT A – EPBC Protected Matters Database Search Results April 2013 Cardno Chenoweth 71 EPBC Act Protected Matters Report This report provides general guidance on matters of national environmental significance and other matters protected by the EPBC Act in the area you have selected. Information on the coverage of this report and qualifications on data supporting this report are contained in the caveat at the end of the report. Information about the EPBC Act including significance guidelines, forms and application process details can be found at http://www.environment.gov.au/epbc/assessmentsapprovals/index.html Report created: 01/06/12 14:33:07 Summary Details Matters of NES Other Matters Protected by the EPBC Act Extra Information Caveat Acknowledgements This map may contain data which are ©Commonwealth of Australia (Geoscience Australia), ©PSMA 2010 Coordinates Buffer: 6.0Km Summary Matters of National Environment Significance This part of the report summarises the matters of national environmental significance that may occur in, or may relate to, the area you nominated. Further information is available in the detail part of the report, which can be accessed by scrolling or following the links below. If you are proposing to undertake an activity that may have a significant impact on one or more matters of national environmental significance then you should consider the Administrative Guidelines on Significance - see http://www.environment.gov.au/epbc/assessmentsapprovals/guidelines/index.html World Heritage Properties: None National Heritage Places: None Wetlands of International 1 Great Barrier Reef Marine Park: None Commonwealth Marine Areas: None Threatened Ecological Communities: 1 Threatened Species: 57 Migratory Species: 27 Other Matters Protected by the EPBC Act This part of the report summarises other matters protected under the Act that may relate to the area you nominated.
  • Assessment of Species Listing Proposals for CITES Cop18

    Assessment of Species Listing Proposals for CITES Cop18

    VKM Report 2019: 11 Assessment of species listing proposals for CITES CoP18 Scientific opinion of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment Utkast_dato Scientific opinion of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (VKM) 15.03.2019 ISBN: 978-82-8259-327-4 ISSN: 2535-4019 Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (VKM) Po 4404 Nydalen N – 0403 Oslo Norway Phone: +47 21 62 28 00 Email: [email protected] vkm.no vkm.no/english Cover photo: Public domain Suggested citation: VKM, Eli. K Rueness, Maria G. Asmyhr, Hugo de Boer, Katrine Eldegard, Anders Endrestøl, Claudia Junge, Paolo Momigliano, Inger E. Måren, Martin Whiting (2019) Assessment of Species listing proposals for CITES CoP18. Opinion of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment, ISBN:978-82-8259-327-4, Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (VKM), Oslo, Norway. VKM Report 2019: 11 Utkast_dato Assessment of species listing proposals for CITES CoP18 Note that this report was finalised and submitted to the Norwegian Environment Agency on March 15, 2019. Any new data or information published after this date has not been included in the species assessments. Authors of the opinion VKM has appointed a project group consisting of four members of the VKM Panel on Alien Organisms and Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), five external experts, and one project leader from the VKM secretariat to answer the request from the Norwegian Environment Agengy. Members of the project group that contributed to the drafting of the opinion (in alphabetical order after chair of the project group): Eli K.