DOCSLIB.ORG

The G20 and the EU: a Win-Win Game

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The G20 and the EU: a Win-Win Game ISSN 2443-8030 (online) The G20 and the EU: A Win-Win Game Moreno Bertoldi, Heinz Scherrer and Guergana Stanoeva ECONOMIC BRIEF 009 | APRIL 2016 EUROPEAN ECONOMY Economic and EUROPEAN Financial Affairs ECONOMY European Economy Economic Briefs are written by the staff of the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs to inform discussion on economic policy and to stimulate debate. The views expressed in this document are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official views of the European Commission. Authorised for publication by Anne Bucher, Deputy Director-General for Economic and Financial Affairs. LEGAL NOTICE Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on its behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained in this publication, or for any errors which, despite careful preparation and checking, may appear. This paper exists in English only and can be downloaded from http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/. Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). More information on the European Union is available on http://europa.eu. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2016 KC-BE-16-009-EN-N (online) KC-BE-16-009-EN-C (print) ISBN 978-92-79-54471-2 (online) ISBN 978-92-79-54470-5 (print) doi:10.2765/532431 (online) doi:10.2765/2540 (print) © European Union, 2016 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. European Commission Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs The G20 and the EU: A Win-Win Game By Moreno Bertoldi, Heinz Scherrer and Guergana Stanoeva Summary This article analyses the role played by the European Union in the G20 Finance Ministerial and Central Bank Governors process, the so-called "G20 finance track". Thanks to its experience in the coordination of economic policies and its important economic weight, the EU has been able to add significant value to the work of the G20. In return, it has been quite open in taking into account the suggestions of its peers in the G20 and translating some of them into policy action. We discuss some cases that demonstrate the important synergies that have been developed between the G20 and the EU and we conclude with suggestions for further developing the existing potential. Acknowledgements: The note benefited from comments by Elena Flores, Anne Bucher and Marco Buti. Contact: Moreno Bertoldi, EU Delegation to the United States, [email protected]; Heinz Scherrer, European Commission, Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs, [email protected]; Guergana Stanoeva, European Commission, Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs, [email protected]. EUROPEAN ECONOMY Economic Brief 009 European Economy Economic Briefs Issue 009 | April 2016 Introduction The EU in the G20 "finance track" This article analyses the role played by the EU in the How the G20 "finance track" works G20 Finance Ministerial process, the so-called "G20 finance track". The G20 was established in 1999 as a As the G20 is the main forum for international gathering of Finance Ministers and Central Bank economic and financial cooperation, inevitably the Governors in the context of the Asian financial crisis G20 finance track plays a crucial role in it. Still it is and upgraded to Leaders level in 2008 in reaction to not the only work strand of the G20. There is also the global financial crisis. The EU has been a the "non-financial track" that covers issues member of the G20 from the very beginning. Thanks concerning trade, employment, agriculture, to its experience in the coordination of economic development, climate change, etc. The issues policies, the EU has been able to provide significant discussed in the "finance" and "non-finance" tracks value added to the G20 work. In return, it has been are brought to the attention of G20 Sherpas who, as quite open in taking into account the suggestions of representatives of G20 Leaders, are in charge of its peers in the G20 and translating some of them in preparing the G20 Summits (see Table 1 for the policy action. main types of meetings under the 2016 G20 Presidency). Table 1: Main Types of Meetings and Working Groups under the Chinese G20 Presidency G20 Summit of Heads of State/Government G20 Finance Track G20 Sherpa Track Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors Sherpas Finance and Central Bank Deputies Labour and Employment Ministers Framework for Strong Sustainable and Balanced Growth Working Energy Ministers Group (WG) International Financial Architecture WG Trade Ministers Investment & Infrastructure WG Agriculture Ministers Climate Finance Study Group (SG) Agriculture Deputies Green Finance SG Employment WG Energy Sustainability WG Development WG Anti-Corruption WG Trade and Investment WG Meetings of engagement groups: B20 (Business 20); L20 (Labour 20); T20 (Think 20); Y20 (Youth 20); W20 (Women 20) The agenda of the G20 "finance-track" is composed preparation of the finance track meetings, the G20 of (i) recurrent topics and (ii) special topics. Presidency prepares "issues notes" presenting the Recurrent topics include: the global economic main questions for discussion. situation and outlook; macroeconomic cooperation and coordination, policies aimed at fostering growth; The finance track work of each Presidency starts financial regulatory reform; tax transparency; and with a top down approach. Following the Leaders' the reform of the international financial architecture. Summit (which in general takes place in the Depending on the mandate provided by Leaders at autumn), the new Presidency normally organises their Summits other issues can be added to the before the end of the year a G20 Finance Deputy agenda. For instance, recognising the essential role meeting to discuss and define the priorities and the that the long-term financing of the economy plays in work programme until the next Summit. The supporting the G20 goal of strong, sustainable and working and study groups1 of the finance track then balanced growth, in February 2013 Finance meet and prepare a work programme that is Ministers and Central Bank Governors agreed to discussed and approved by Finance Ministers at their establish a Study Group on Financing for Investment ministerial meeting in February. On the basis of the which afterwards was upgraded to the G20 approved work programme, the working groups Investment and Infrastructure Working Group. In prepare reports and policy recommendations (for 3 European Economy Economic Briefs Issue 009 | April 2016 instance on the G20 growth strategies) that are then The role of the EU in the G20 transmitted to Deputies and Ministers that, once approved, become the core of the Action Plan for Examples of EU contributions to the the G20 Summit. economic policy coordination process in After each G20 Finance meeting, Finance Ministers the G20 and Central Bank Governors issue a carefully crafted The EU is the G20 member which by its own nature communiqué, where they state the consensus has decade-long experience in economic policy reached and possible policy actions to be undertaken coordination. Due to this and also to its important by G20 members. As the G20 works by consensus, economic weight (see Fig. 1) it is well placed to these documents generally are market-reassuring and provide constructive suggestions and proposals try to support global confidence. More importantly, regarding economic policy cooperation and they provide an indication of the level of ambition in coordination even in situations where G20 members the field of international economic cooperation have different views and positions. Three examples among G20 countries (most recently on tax 2 taken from the work of the G20 Framework for cooperation) , and are therefore carefully read by market participants. Strong, Sustainable and Balanced Growth illustrate quite well the originality of the EU contribution. Graph 1: G20 GDP Shares, USD bln, current prices, 2016 projections The EU in the G20 "finance track" At the Finance Ministers' and Central Bank Governors' meetings, the EU is represented by the Commissioner for Economic and Financial Affairs, Taxation and Customs, the Finance Minister of the rotating EU Council Presidency, and the European Central Bank Governor3 (this applies also for the Deputies meetings). The EU in the G20 represents all EU Member States. As some EU Member States are also G20 members (France, Germany, Italy and the UK) or permanent guests (Spain), EU representatives play a key role in the coordination process of the EU positions in the G20. The aim is to provide as much as possible a consistent message on the EU policy stance and actions to the rest of the world. Source: IMF, WEO, October 2015 The common European negotiating position on "finance track" topics is stated in so-called "terms of The first example concerns the correction of macro- reference". This is a short document which economic imbalances. This issue has been at the summarises the EU common view on the topics heart of the G20 policy agenda since 2009, when the present in the Finance Ministers' and Central Bank Framework for Strong Sustainable and Balanced Governors' agenda4. Growth was launched. However, as of the beginning of 2011, there was still not an agreed approach on The EU coordination process starts well in advance how to analytically identify and then tackle global of each G20 meeting. "Draft Terms of reference", imbalances. Because of an early unsuccessful jointly prepared by the European Commission, the attempt at reducing global imbalances through ECB and the EU Council Presidency, are first international cooperation within the IMF circulated for written comments and then discussed framework5 and the impossibility to reach by EU State Secretaries for Finance in the EU agreement within the G20 on "thresholds" above Economic and Financial Committee.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Battle Over Taxing Offshore Accounts
    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2012 The Battle Over Taxing Offshore Accounts Itai Grinberg Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/1786 http://ssrn.com/abstract=2497998 60 UCLA L. Rev. 304 This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Taxation-Transnational Commons, and the Tax Law Commons The Battle Over Taxing Offshore Accounts Itai Grinberg EVIEW R ABSTRACT The international tax system is in the midst of a contest between automatic information reporting and anonymous withholding models for ensuring that nations have the ability to LA LAW LA LAW tax offshore accounts. At stake is the extent of many countries’ capacity to tax investment UC income of individuals and profits of closely held businesses through an income tax in an increasingly financially integrated world. Incongruent initiatives of the European Union, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Switzerland, and the United States together represent an emerging international regime in which financial institutions act to facilitate countries’ ability to tax their residents’ offshore accounts. The growing consensus that financial institutions should act as cross-border tax intermediaries represents a remarkable shift in international norms that has yet to be recognized in the academic literature. The debate, however, is about how financial institutions should serve as cross-border tax intermediaries, and for which countries. Different outcomes in this contest portend starkly different futures for the extent of cross-border tax administrative assistance available to most countries.
    [Show full text]
  • A Toolkit for Gender Equality Experts
    ADVOCACY WITHIN THE T20: A toolkit for gender equality experts ADVOCACY WITHIN THE T20: A toolkit for gender equality experts Acknowledgements This guide was written by Mariela Magnelli, with the input and com- ments from Abigail Hunt and Brenda Yu (Overseas Development Insti- tute), Lorena Alcazar and Norma Correa (Grupo Sofia), and Gala Díaz Langou and Florencia Caro Sachetti (CIPPEC), and support from the International Development Research Centre (IDRC). With thanks to Carolina Robino and the Gender Economic Equity Task Force members for their contributions to the work of the Task Force and their commit- ment to advance gender equity and women’s rights. About the T20 The T20 is one of the G20’s engagement groups, where representatives of different civil society stakeholders take their demands and propos- als to G20 countries. It gathers think tanks and leading experts from around the world to produce concrete policy recommendations. During 2018 the T20 is co-chaired by the Argentine Council for International Relations (CARI) and the Center for the Implementation of Public Poli- cies for Equity and Growth (CIPPEC). More information here: https://t20argentina.org Table of Contents SECTION 1: The G20, Gender and Engagement Groups 6 1. Introduction 8 › The G20: a brief history, purposes and processes › How the G20 works 2. The G20 and the Gender Equity Agenda 10 › History › Establishment of Women 20 › Establishment of Think 20 3. The G20 Presidency under Argentina 11 › Overarching theme: ‘Building Consensus for fair and sustainable development’ › Women 20 Argentina: Aims › Think 20 Argentina › About the T20 Gender Economic Equity Task Force › Gender Economic Equity Task Force Secretariat SECTION 2: Gendering the T20.
    [Show full text]
  • FINANCIAL CRISIS and LEGITIMACY of GLOBAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS Masaki Kusano Graduate School of Economics, Kyoto University Kusa
    FINANCIAL CRISIS AND LEGITIMACY OF GLOBAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS Masaki Kusano Graduate School of Economics, Kyoto University [email protected] ∗ Masatsugu Sanada Graduate School of Business, Osaka City University [email protected] May, 2013 ∗ Corresponding author FINANCIAL CRISIS AND LEGITIMACY OF GLOBAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ABSTRACT Purpose : to examine and clarify a mechanism of global accounting standard-setting and accounting regulation, especially to investigate the legitimation crises of global accounting standards and their restoration process focusing on the IASB’s response to the financial crisis. Methodology : institutional theory and an analytical framework of ‘decoupling, compromises, and systematic dominance’ Findings : We find that the IASB decoupled its regular due process in order to maintain the endorsement mechanisms in the EU and avoid a further carve-out. To reconcile the concerns about the IASB’s governance from the U.S. and the outside of Europe, the IASB established the monitoring board with compromising its expertise principle laying weight on independence with the request for enhancing its accountability. We also find that the IASB systematically put a dominance position to the needs of the EU as the biggest customer. Originality/value : We show the complicated mechanism of accounting standard-setting which the mere debates of the politicization of accounting could not reveal, and clarify that the legitimacy of organization, procedure, and its outputs could not exist stand-alone, but mutually prerequisite or exist with reflexivity. This study extends our knowledge of global financial regulations and our discussion offers numerous suggestions to globalization, especially the IASB’s roles in the globalization of financial regulations, and regulatory forum or network centered on the IASB.
    [Show full text]
  • Whitehall in Brussels: the Uk Permanent Representation to the Eu
    WHITEHALL IN BRUSSELS: THE UK PERMANENT REPRESENTATION TO THE EU MATT BEVINGTON WHITEHALL IN BRUSSELS: THE UK PERMANENT REPRESENTATION TO THE EU 1 FOREWORD The UK has left the European Union but the two sides, as neighbours, partners and competitors, will need to continue to work with each other. How this happens matters. The UK Permanent Represeenation to the European Union was, during the UK’s membership, a crucial cog in the machinery both of UK-EU interaction and of coordination within Whitehall. Renamed the UK Mission to the EU it will continue to play a vital role. I’d like to thank Matt Bevington for producing this report for us, and to recommend it to you as an invaluable summary both of how the UK interacted with the EU in the past, and what role UKMiss might play in those interactions going forward. More broadly, as Matt has now left UKICE to work elsewhere, this serves as an opportunity to thank him for all his work for us over the last few years. He will be sadly missed. In addition, thanks are due to Jill Rutter for editing and checking over the report, and Navjyot Lehl for handling design issues. I hope you find what follows interesting and useful. Anand Menon 10 March 2021 2 WHITEHALL IN BRUSSELS: THE UK PERMANENT REPRESENTATION TO THE EU CONTENTS Foreword 2 Introduction 4 The Permanent Representation to the EU 5 Size 6 Culture 7 Structure 8 Senior officials 13 Permanent Representative 13 Deputy Permanent Representative 17 EU Sherpa 19 Negotiation 24 Tactics 25 Personalities and experience 27 Engaging with Whitehall 31 Explaining Europe 31 A changing EU 34 Influencing policy 34 Influencing at EU level 38 The British approach 38 European Parliament 40 Bureaucratic positions 43 Brexit 46 The renegotiation 48 After the referendum 50 The UK Mission to the EU 55 Conclusion 58 WHITEHALL IN BRUSSELS: THE UK PERMANENT REPRESENTATION TO THE EU 3 INTRODUCTION The UK has left the EU, but a close and important relationship between the two is inevitable and needs to be maintained.
    [Show full text]
  • The Judges 2017 FT & Mckinsey Business Book of the Year Award
    By continuing to use this site you consent to the use of cookies on your device as described in our cookie policy unless you have disabled them. You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them. Business books The judges 2017 Lionel Barber, FT editor, chairs our panel of experts FT & McKinsey Business Book of the Year Award YESTERDAY LIONEL BARBER Editor, Financial Times Lionel Barber is the editor of the Financial Times. Since his appointment in 2005, Barber has helped solidify the FT’s position as one of the first publishers to successfully transform itself into a multichannel news organisation. During Barber’s tenure, the FT has won numerous global prizes for its journalism, including Newspaper of the Year, Overseas Press Club, Gerald Loeb and Society of Publishers in Asia awards. Barber has co-written several books and has lectured widely on foreign policy, transatlantic relations, European security and monetary union in the US and Europe and appears regularly on TV and radio around the world. As editor, he has interviewed many of the world’s leaders in business and politics, including: US President Barack Obama, Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany and President of Iran Hassan Rouhani. Barber has received several distinguished awards, including the St George Society medal of honour for his contribution to journalism in the transatlantic community. He serves on the Board of Trustees at the Tate and the Carnegie Corporation of New York. MITCHELL BAKER Executive chairwoman, Mozilla Mitchell Baker co-founded the Mozilla Project to support the open, innovative web and ensure it continues offering opportunities for everyone.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded on 2017-02-12T05:19:39Z ASIEN 128 (Juli 2013), S
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Cork Open Research Archive Title Existing and emerging powers in the G20: the case of East Asia Author(s) Duggan, Niall; Tiberghien, Yves Publication date 2013-07 Original citation Duggan, N. and Tiberghien, Y. (2013) 'Existing and emerging powers in the G20: the case of East Asia', Asien, 128, pp. 28-44. Type of publication Article (peer-reviewed) Link to publisher's http://asienforschung.de/wp- version content/uploads/2014/05/DGA_MV_2013_Konferenzbericht.pdf Access to the full text of the published version may require a subscription. Rights © 2013, German Association for Asian Studies. Item downloaded http://hdl.handle.net/10468/3567 from Downloaded on 2017-02-12T05:19:39Z ASIEN 128 (Juli 2013), S. 28–44 Existing and Emerging Powers in the G20: The Case of East Asia Yves Tiberghien and Niall Duggan Abstract Over the last twenty years, global financial integration and global financial volatility have greatly increased. The 2008 crisis represented a peak in the vulnerability of all countries around the world with regard to global financial volatility. In response to this volatility and as the first line of defense, states have used a growing array of domestic tools: monetary policy, fiscal policy, financial regulatory reforms, domestic security market reforms, occasional capital controls, or the accumulation of financial reserves. Although the G20 was formed in 1999, it did not begin to take center stage in global economic governance until the global financial crisis that started in 2008. Since 2008, systemically important states — both established and aspiring powers — have taken the further steps of committing to increased global financial governance and becoming more integrated into the G20.
    [Show full text]
  • China in the G20: a Narrow Corridor for [email protected] Sino–European Cooperation
    Focus | ASIA Dr. des. Sebastian Biba Sebastian Biba and Heike Holbig Goethe University Frankfurt China in the G20: A Narrow Corridor for [email protected] Sino–European Cooperation GIGA Focus | Asia | Number 2 | May 2017 | ISSN 1862-359X Prof. Dr. Heike Holbig Since it hosted the G20 summit and since Trump’s ascent to the US presi- Senior Research Fellow [email protected] dency, China has promoted its role as a defender of free trade. In line with European interests, China has also become a supporter of G20 attempts to GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies tackle the emerging crisis of globalisation. Indeed, China has many reasons Leibniz-Institut für Globale und Regionale Studien to be a facilitative player in the G20. However, its engagement entails limi- Neuer Jungfernstieg 21 tations for the G20 going forward. 20354 Hamburg www.giga-hamburg.de/giga-focus • Compared to India, another emerging power, China has assumed an active role in the G20, seeking to put its stamp on the G20 agenda and calling for the fo- rum’s transformation from a crisis-response mechanism to one of long-term economic governance. • There are various incentives for China to play this role: the G20’s small but widen ed membership relative to the G7, the opportunities for status enhance- ment and for pushing global governance reforms, the loose institutional design, and the focus on issues that China feels comfortable dealing with. • However, China’s prospective engagement has limits. We cannot expect China to agree to a widening of the agenda beyond financial and economic issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Networked Governance and Summit Diplomacy: Shaping the Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Agenda
    Networked governance and summit diplomacy: shaping the maternal, newborn and child health agenda by Clint L. Abbott A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfilment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Global Governance Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2012 © Clint L. Abbott 2012 Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract Diplomatic summits serve as critical opportunities for national leaders to interact and mobilize the political will needed to address the world’s greatest challenges. Yet, summits have a checkered past with both successes and failures. Consequently, summit diplomacy has been equated with highly publicized photo opportunities for heads of government and grandiose communiqués with vague commitments that are never fully realized. Due to concerns about their effectiveness, legitimacy, and representation, summits are in a period of transition. These trends and challenges are especially evident in the G8, and scholars have recognized that the G8 summit has evolved to include more actors than the past. Although acknowledged as a potential site of networked governance, empirical evidence of such activity is limited. Research has yet to identify the actors involved, the structures of the relationships, and the impact of networked approaches on the preparatory process. This research specifically explores the question of how a global level network affects the priorities adopted by the G8. Using the 2010 G8 Summit as a case to examine the increased prevalence of networked activity, this study focuses on the Summit’s signature initiative: maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH).
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report | 2019-20 Ministry of External Affairs New Delhi
    Ministry of External Affairs Annual Report | 2019-20 Ministry of External Affairs New Delhi Annual Report | 2019-20 The Annual Report of the Ministry of External Affairs is brought out by the Policy Planning and Research Division. A digital copy of the Annual Report can be accessed at the Ministry’s website : www.mea.gov.in. This Annual Report has also been published as an audio book (in Hindi) in collaboration with the National Institute for the Empowerment of Persons with Visual Disabilities (NIEPVD) Dehradun. Designed and Produced by www.creativedge.in Dr. S Jaishankar External Affairs Minister. Earlier Dr S Jaishankar was President – Global Corporate Affairs at Tata Sons Private Limited from May 2018. He was Foreign Secretary from 2015-18, Ambassador to United States from 2013-15, Ambassador to China from 2009-2013, High Commissioner to Singapore from 2007- 2009 and Ambassador to the Czech Republic from 2000-2004. He has also served in other diplomatic assignments in Embassies in Moscow, Colombo, Budapest and Tokyo, as well in the Ministry of External Affairs and the President’s Secretariat. Dr S. Jaishankar is a graduate of St. Stephen’s College at the University of Delhi. He has an MA in Political Science and an M. Phil and Ph.D in International Relations from Jawaharlal Nehru University, Delhi. He is a recipient of the Padma Shri award in 2019. He is married to Kyoko Jaishankar and has two sons & and a daughter. Shri V. Muraleedharan Minister of State for External Affairs Shri V. Muraleedharan, born on 12 December 1958 in Kanuur District of Kerala to Shri Gopalan Vannathan Veettil and Smt.
    [Show full text]
  • SWP Comments Andreas Maurer
    Introduction Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs Scale back or Forge ahead? Opportunities and risks associated with the Intergovernmental Conference on the European Constitution SWP Comments Andreas Maurer On 4 October 2003 the heads of state and government and foreign ministers of all 25 existing and imminently acceding Member States of the European Union, European Commission President Romano Prodi and two representatives of the European Parlia- ment opened the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC) convened in Rome to discuss the draft European Constitution. Just under nine weeks from that date, by mid-December, after a probable total of nine meetings, the Constitution will supposedly be adopted. The period elapsing between the official that the Italian EU Presidency is proposing reception of the draft Constitution and the to subject both the institutional and start of the IGC totalled three-and-a-half security policy chapters of the Constitution months. Bearing in mind the widely dif- to review by the IGC. However, in addition fering standpoints, the questions arising to this, Italy, France, Germany, the Benelux with regard to the IGC are as follows: countries and – since just recently – Den- firstly, whether the draft Constitution mark have all rejected the call to scale back should undergo any substantial changes, the draft Constitutional Treaty consider- and secondly, what consequences such ably, pointing out that any Member State changes might have for the EU’s further wishing to call into question the Conven- development. It should be clear by now that tion’s consensus on a particular issue will all actors involved in the IGC are unhappy be responsible for reaching a fresh agree- with some sections of the draft Constitu- ment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Group of Seven
    The Group of Seven We are now in the era of the G8, although the G7 still exists as a grouping for finance ministers and central bank governors. Why do G7 finance ministries and central banks co-operate? What are the implications of this for the power of the United States and the abilities of the other six states to exercise leadership? What influence do the G7 have on global financial governance? How much authority do they possess and how is that authority exercised? This is the first major work to address these fundamental questions. It argues that to understand the G7’s contribution to global financial governance it is necessary to locate the group’s activities in a context of ‘decentralized globalization’. It also provides original case study material on the G7’s contribution to macro- economic governance and to debates on the global financial architecture over the last decade. The book assesses the G7’s role in producing a system of global financial governance based on market supremacy and technocratic trans-governmental consensus and articulates normative criticisms of the G7’s exclusivity. For researchers in the fields of IR/IPE, postgraduate students in the field of international organization and global governance, policy-makers and financial journalists, this is the most comprehensive analysis of the G7 and financial governance to date. Andrew Baker is Lecturer at the School of Politics and International Studies at the Queen’s University of Belfast. He is the co-editor of Governing Financial Globalisation (Routledge, 2005) and has published in journals such as Review of International Political Economy and Global Governance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Procyclicality of Loan Loss Provisions: a Literature Review
    Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Working Paper 39 The procyclicality of loan loss provisions: a literature review May 2021 The Working Papers of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision contain analysis carried out by experts of the Basel Committee or its working groups. They may also reflect work carried out by one or more member institutions or by its Secretariat. The subjects of the Working Papers are of topical interest to supervisors and are technical in character. The views expressed in the Working Papers are those of their authors and do not represent the official views of the Basel Committee, its member institutions or the BIS. This publication is available on the BIS website (www.bis.org/bcbs/). Grey underlined text in this publication shows where hyperlinks are available in the electronic version. © Bank for International Settlements 2021. All rights reserved. Brief excerpts may be reproduced or translated provided the source is stated. Contents List of members of the Research Group work stream ......................................................................................................... v Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Relevant background information ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]