DOCSLIB.ORG

RAYTHEON COMPANY (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003. ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number 1-13699 RAYTHEON COMPANY (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter) DELAWARE 95-1778500 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 870 WINTER STREET, WALTHAM, MASSACHUSETTS 02451 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code) (781) 522-3000 Registrant’s telephone number, including area code Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered Common Stock, $.01 par value New York Stock Exchange Chicago Stock Exchange Pacific Exchange Equity Security Units New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer. Yes ☒ No ☐ The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, as of June 29, 2003, was approximately $13.3 billion. Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of December 31, 2003: 418,136,000. Documents incorporated by reference and made a part of this Form 10-K: Portions of the Proxy Statement for Raytheon’s 2004 Annual Meeting which will be filed with the Commission within 120 days after the close of Part III Raytheon’s fiscal year. Table of Contents INDEX Table of Contents Page PART I Item 1. Business 3 Item 2. Properties 16 Item 3. Legal Proceedings 18 Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 20 Item 4(A). Executive Officers of the Registrant 20 PART II Item 5. Market For Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters 23 Item 6. Selected Financial Data 24 Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 25 Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 39 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 40 Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 68 Item 9A. Controls and Procedures 68 PART III Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant 69 Item 11. Executive Compensation 69 Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters 69 Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions 70 Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services 70 PART IV Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K 71 2 Table of Contents PART I Item 1. Business GENERAL Raytheon Company (“Raytheon” or the “Company”), with worldwide 2003 sales of $18.1 billion, is an industry leader in defense and government electronics, space, information technology, technical services, and business and special mission aircraft. Raytheon was founded in 1922 and is currently incorporated in the state of Delaware. The Company is the surviving company of the 1997 merger of HE Holdings, Inc. and Raytheon Company. Raytheon’s government and defense business is currently aligned in six business segments: Integrated Defense Systems; Intelligence and Information Systems; Missile Systems; Network Centric Systems; Space and Airborne Systems; and Technical Services. Raytheon Aircraft is one of the leading providers of business and special mission aircraft and delivers a broad line of jet, turboprop, and piston-powered airplanes to individual, corporate and government customers world- wide. The Company’s principal executive offices are located at 870 Winter Street, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451. The Company’s Internet address is www.raytheon.com. The content on the Company’s website is available for information purposes only. It should not be relied upon for investment purposes, nor is it incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K. The Company makes available free of charge on or through its Internet website under the heading “Investor Relations,” its report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after it electronically files such material with, or furnishes it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. BUSINESS SEGMENTS Effective January 1, 2003, the Company began reporting its government and defense businesses in six segments. In addition, the Company’s Commercial Electronics businesses were reassigned to the new Integrated Defense Systems and Network Centric Systems defense segments. The Company has conformed its segment reporting accordingly and has reclassified comparative prior period information to reflect this change. See “Note P - Business Segment Reporting” within Item 8 of this Form 10-K. Integrated Defense Systems. The Integrated Defense Systems (IDS) segment is Raytheon’s leader in mission systems integration. With a strong international and domestic customer base, including the U.S. Missile Defense Agency and the U.S. Armed Forces, IDS provides integrated air and missile defense and naval and maritime solutions. IDS’ major programs, products and initiatives currently include: DD(X), SPY-3 Radar, the Patriot Air and Missile Defense System, Early Warning Radars, the Cobra Judy Replacement program, Surface-Launched AMRAAM (SLAMRAAM), Complementary Low-Altitude Weapon System (CLAWS), Theater High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) Radar, Sea-Based X-Band Radar (SBX), Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS), Upgraded Early Warning Radar (UEWR), Joint Land Attack Cruise Missile Defense Elevated Netted Sensor (JLENS), Landing Platform Dock Amphibious Ship LPD-17, Common Aviation Command and Control System (CAC2S), Combat System Mk2 (CCS Mk2), Ship Self-Defense System (SSDS) and Aegis Weapon Systems radar equipment. Some specific IDS accomplishments in 2003 included: • Award of a contract to provide engineering, construction, integration and testing of a forward-deployable BMDS radar. The BMDS radar, is a transportable, X-band, phased array radar with sufficient sensitivity to detect, track and discriminate between missile threats; • Mission systems engineering, software development, and test and evaluation services as systems integrator on the DD(X) program, the U.S. Navy’s next-generation surface combatant ship; • Fabrication, assembly and testing of the Sea-based Test-XBR, a high powered, phased-array radar mounted on an ocean-going platform and designed to meet near-term ballistic missile threats; • Design, production, integration, and testing of Cobra Judy Replacement Mission Equipment for the Naval Sea Systems Command. The existing Cobra Judy is an integrated, computer-driven surveillance and data collection radar system. IDS will replace the current Cobra Judy with a dual-band radar suite consisting of X-band and S-band active phased array sensors and other related mission equipment; and • Development of the JLENS Spiral 2, a netted sensor system for cruise missile defense, for the U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command. 3 Table of Contents Product performance and support and price are among the principal competitive factors considered by IDS’ customers, which include the U.S. Missile Defense Agency and the U.S. Armed Forces. IDS relies upon its domain knowledge and products to compete in the Missile Defense, Integrated Air Defense and other mission areas. Intelligence and Information Systems. The Intelligence and Information Systems (IIS) segment is a leading provider of systems, subsystems, and software engineering services for national and tactical intelligence systems, as well as for homeland security and information technology solutions. Areas of special concentration include processing, analysis and dissemination of signals and imagery, production of geospatial intelligence, command and control of airborne and spaceborne platforms including unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV’s) and satellites, and integrated ground systems for weather and environmental programs. IIS contracts encompass a broad range of products from signal intelligence (SIGINT) sensors (used on platforms such as U2) to mission management systems (used to manage operation and data for platforms like Global Hawk). In addition, IIS delivers integrated solutions for government IT requirements and knowledge driven homeland security solutions for customers worldwide. IIS’ major programs, products and initiatives currently include: UAV systems and Ground Stations, Signal and Imagery Intelligence Programs, Communications Systems, Information Solutions Programs, Department of Education Programs, Supercomputing, National Polar-orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite System Program, Mobile Very Small Aperture Satellite
Recommended publications
  • RAYTHEON COMPANY (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter) ______

    RAYTHEON COMPANY (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter) ______

    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2019 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number 1-13699 ________________________________________________________________________________ RAYTHEON COMPANY (Exact name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter) ________________________________________________________________________________ Delaware 95-1778500 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 870 Winter Street, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code) (781) 522-3000 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) ________________________________________________________________________________ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.
  • Cruise Missiles Post World War II

    Cruise Missiles Post World War II

    Cruise missiles milestones MILE post STONES World War II Dr Carlo Kopp THE BASIC TECHNOLOGY AND OPERATIONAL CONCEPT OF MODERN CRUISE MISSILES EMERGED DURING THE LATE 1960S, at the peak of the Cold War era. This type of weapon was exemplified by the RGM-109 Tomahawk series, the AGM-86C/D CALCM, the AGM-158 JASSM, and the Russian Kh-55SM Granat. Much less known is the generation of cruise missile technology that supplanted the 1940s era FZG-76/V-1 and its Russian and American clone variants. A good number of the former Soviet weapons of this generation remain in use, some still in production. The aim of all cruise missile designs is to provide a weapon that can strike at a target while not exposing the launch platform to attack by enemy defences, whether the launch platform is an aircraft, surface warship, submarine or ground vehicle. Key parameters in the design of any cruise missile are its standoff range, its accuracy and its survivability against target defences. Increasing standoff range reduces risk to the launch platform while increasing accuracy and survivability reduces the number of launches required to achieve desired effect. The economics of bombardment are simple: the more expensive the weapon employed, the smaller the war stock available for combat at any time, and the longer it takes to replenish this war stock once expended. Northrop SM-62 Snark strategic cruise missile. This enormous 50,000 lb plus GLCM was built to directly attack the Soviet Union from US basing. It introduced the fi rst stellar-inertial guidance system in a cruise missile.
  • SBX Sourcebook, Volume II

    SBX Sourcebook, Volume II

    An SBX Sourcebook, Volume II Version of 2012-05-13 Additional information for this sourcebook would be welcome. Please send it to [email protected] SBX ballasted down in stable “semi-submerged” operating position SBX-1 fully afloat and under way http://www.indeed.com/salary/q-Shift-Security-Lead-Sbx-l-Adak,-AK.html http://marinetraffic.com/ais/ Accessed 2012-05-11T14:32Z http://hosted.ap.org/specials/interactives/documents/nas_response.pdf April 30, 2012 Representative Michael R. Turner Chairman, Strategic Forces Subcommittee House Armed Services Committee Representative Loretta Sanchez Ranking Member House Armed Services Committee Dear Mr. Turner and Ms. Sanchez: We are pleased to provide the following responses to the twelve (12) questions you raised to us in your April 20 letter. Before doing so, however, it is appropriate to make clear that our responses are unclassified as you requested (i.e., some specific details have been omitted to avoid making this letter classified). Furthermore, our responses are based on the briefing we provided to your subcommittee on April 18, as well as the work of a National Research Council (NRC) committee1 which we co-chaired and helped prepare the NRC report entitled Making Sense of Ballistic Missile Defense: An Assessment of Concepts and Systems for U.S. Boost-Phase Missile Defense in Comparison to Other Alternatives which is undergoing final security classification review by the Missile Defense Agency (MDA). It is also appropriate to make clear that the committee examined ballistic missile defense (BMD) for the following limited missions for defense against attacks that could plausibly be mounted by “rogue states” in the next decade or so: (1) protection of the U.S.
  • GAO WEAPONS ACQUISITION Precision Guided Munitions In

    GAO WEAPONS ACQUISITION Precision Guided Munitions In

    United States General Accounting Office GAO Report to Congressional Committees June 1995 WEAPONS ACQUISITION Precision Guided Munitions in Inventory, Production, and Development GAO/NSIAD-95-95 United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 National Security and International Affairs Division B-260458 June 23, 1995 Congressional Committees The military services are spending billions of dollars to acquire new and improved munitions whose technical sophistication allows guidance corrections during their flight to the target. These weapons are referred to as precision guided munitions (PGM). We reviewed Air Force, Navy, and Army munitions programs in inventory, production, and development that could be defined as using precision guidance to attack surface targets.1 Our objectives were to determine (1) the costs and quantities planned for the PGMs, (2) the services rationale for initiating PGM development programs, (3) options available to the services to attack surface targets with PGMs, and (4) the extent to which the services are jointly developing and procuring PGMs. We conducted this work under our basic legislative responsibilities and plan to use this baseline report in planning future work on Defense-wide issues affecting the acquisition and effectiveness of PGMs. We are addressing the report to you because we believe it will be of interest to your committees. PGMs employ various guidance methods to enhance the probability of Background hitting the target. These include target location information from a human designator, global positioning system (GPS) satellites, an inertial navigation system, a terminal seeker on the munition, or a combination of these sources. Since PGMs can correct errors in flight, the services expect to need fewer rounds to achieve the same or higher probabilities of kill as unguided weapons.
  • 2004 Raytheon Annual Report

    2004 Raytheon Annual Report

    Focused on the Customer 2004 annual report Board of Directors ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ . . . . . , .** Chairman and CEO Institute Professor Chairman and Retired President and Chairman and Raytheon Company Massachusetts Institute of Chief Executive Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief Executive Officer Technology American Standard Data General Corporation Cypress International Inc. ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ Companies, Inc. ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ Retired General, U.S. Army . . ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ . Former Commander-in- International Business and President Emeritus . * Retired President and Chief of the United Nations Aviation Attorney California Institute of of Counsel Chief Executive Officer Command, Republic of ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ Technology Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Luminent, Inc. Korea/United States Wharton Garrison ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ Combined Forces/United - ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ . States Forces Korea Retired Chairman and . Partner Chief Executive Officer Chairman Stuntz, Davis Staffier, P.C. *Lead Director Cabot Industrial Trust EMC Corporation **Retiring effective “2004 was a strong year with May 4, 2005 record orders of $25.7 billion; sales Leadership Team of $20.2 billion – a 12% increase Clockwise from upper left: Rebecca R. Rhoads, Jay B. Stephens, Donald M. Ronchi, Charles E. Franklin, Keith J. Peden, John D. Harris II, Edward S. Pliner, Thomas M. Culligan,
  • Innovation in All Domains. Raytheon in the United Kingdom

    Innovation in All Domains. Raytheon in the United Kingdom

    Raytheon in the United Kingdom: Raytheon UK Innovation in all domains. 5th Floor, Harman House 1 George Street Uxbridge, Middlesex UB8 1QQ United Kingdom [email protected] www.raytheon.co .uk Cleared for public release. Copyright © 2011 Raytheon Company. All rights reserved. “ Customer Success Is Our Mission” is a registered trademark of Raytheon Company.. “ Raytheon Six Sigma” is a registered trademark of Raytheon Company.. “ Clear View” is a registered trademark of Raytheon Company.. From the Chief Executive Today Raytheon in the UK employs more than In air traffic management, Raytheon in the UK 1,200 people at six sites. Our engineers and has an unbroken heritage stretching back to the scientists are leading the way in designing, first British radar trials in the 1930s. Our developing and manufacturing innovative Monopulse Secondary Surveillance Radar is the solutions for our customers in different industries, most successful radar of its type in the world, with businesses and governments. Raytheon brings to more than 500 systems in service in 43 countries, the UK and Europe proven U.S. technology, and we have a large number of new systems on leveraging established products and skills. order from the U.S. and other countries. We have numerous relationships with industrial and research partners which enable us to play an Continuous development of our people and improvement to our processes ensures that as a BOB DELORGE important role as a major technology exporter to more than 40 countries. business we add operational capability to our Chief Executive & customers and ultimately a competitive advantage Managing Director. Raytheon’s UK operations are recognised for the to British industry.
  • Air Base Defense Rethinking Army and Air Force Roles and Functions for More Information on This Publication, Visit

    Air Base Defense Rethinking Army and Air Force Roles and Functions for More Information on This Publication, Visit

    C O R P O R A T I O N ALAN J. VICK, SEAN M. ZEIGLER, JULIA BRACKUP, JOHN SPEED MEYERS Air Base Defense Rethinking Army and Air Force Roles and Functions For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR4368 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0500-5 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2020 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface The growing cruise and ballistic missile threat to U.S. Air Force bases in Europe has led Headquarters U.S.
  • NSIAD-95-95 Weapons Acquisition: Precision Guided Munitions

    NSIAD-95-95 Weapons Acquisition: Precision Guided Munitions

    United States General Accounting Offhe -GAO Report to Congressional Committees June 1996 GAO/NSL4D-95-96 .-- _.-- United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 National Security and International Affairs Division B-260458 June 23,1995 Congressional Committees The military services are spending billions of dollars to acquire new and improved munitions whose technical sophistication allows guidance corrections during their flight to the target. These weapons are referred to as precision guided munitions (PGM). We reviewed Air Force, Navy, and Army munitions programs in inventory, production, and development that could be defined as using precision guidance to attack surface targets.’ Our objectives were to determine (1) the costs and quantities planned for the PGMS, (2) the services rationale for initiating PGM development programs, (3) options available to the services to attack surface targets with PGMs, and (4) the extent to which the services are jointly developing and procuring PGMS. We conducted this work under our basic legislative responsibilities and plan to use this baseline report in planning future work on Defense-wide issues affecting the acquisition and effectiveness of PGMS. We are addressing the report to you because we believe it will be of interest to your committees. -ll.._-~ PGMS employ various guidance methods to enhance the probability of Background hitting the target. These include target location information from a human designator, global positioning system (GPS) satellites, an inertial navigation system, a terminal seeker on the munition, or a combination of these sources. Since PGMs can correct errors in flight, the services expect to need fewer rounds to achieve the same or higher probabilities of kill as unguided weapons, Additionally, the services expect PGM accuracy and lethality to reduce the number of launch platforms and soldiers required to counter specific targets.
  • Optimizing Selection of Tomahawk Cruise Missiles

    Optimizing Selection of Tomahawk Cruise Missiles

    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1998-03 Optimizing selection of Tomahawk Cruise Missiles Kuykendall, Scott D. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/32721 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, California THESIS OPTIMIZING SELECTION OF TOMAHAWK CRmSE MISSILES by Scott D. Kuykendall March, 1998 Thesis Advisor: Richard E. Rosenthal Second Reader: George W. Conner r • Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. DTIC QUALITY INSPECTED--- a REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED March 1998 Master's Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS OPTIMIZING SELECTION OF TOMAHAWK CRUISE MISSILES 6. AUTHOR(S) Kuykendall, Scott D. 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) ANDADDRESS(ES) REPORT NUMBER Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, CA 93943-5000 9. SPONSORING I MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING I MONITORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S.
  • Anarchy Is What Anarchists Make of It: Reclaiming the Concept of Agency in IR and Security Studies

    Anarchy Is What Anarchists Make of It: Reclaiming the Concept of Agency in IR and Security Studies

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by LSE Research Online Chris Rossdale Anarchy is what anarchists make of it: reclaiming the concept of agency in IR and security studies Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Rossdale, Chris (2010) Anarchy is what anarchists make of it: reclaiming the concept of agency in IR and security studies. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 39 (2). pp. 483-501. ISSN 0305-8298 DOI: 10.1177/0305829810384006 © 2010 The Author This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/75253/ Available in LSE Research Online: May 2017 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final accepted version of the journal article. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Anarchy is What Anarchists Make of it: Reclaiming the Concept of Agency in IR and Security Studies Dr Chris Rossdale [email protected] International Relations Department, London School of Economics & Political Science A later version of this paper was published in Millennium: Journal of International Relations, Vol.
  • See FAR 2.101 & 3.104 Page 1 of 8 Addendum 2 to Ju

    See FAR 2.101 & 3.104 Page 1 of 8 Addendum 2 to Ju

    DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY HEADQUARTERS 8725 JOHN J. KINGMAN ROAD FORT BELVOIR, VIRGINIA 22060-6221 Addendum 2 to Justification and Approval for Other than Full and Open Competition (SPRBL1-15-D-0017) 1. Contracting Activity: This Justification and Approval for Other than Full and Open Competition (J&A) Addendum 2 supports requirements generated by the Army, Air Force, Marine Corps, Navy, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), and Foreign Military Sales (FMS). The contracting activity for this requirement is DLA Land at Aberdeen, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD. 2. Description of the Action Being Approved: Contract SPRBL1-15-D-0017 was awarded to Raytheon Company – 350 Lowell Street Andover, Massachusetts, Cage code 05716, on September 28, 2015, on a firm-fixed-price basis including a three (3) year base followed by a three (3) year redeterminable option period. The contract anticipates performance by the following Raytheon Contractor and Government Entity (CAGE) codes: 05716; 15090; 37695; 96214; 072E5; 2M191; 3B150; 4U884; 7Y193; 00724; 06845; 49956; 54X10; 5D744; 4D494; K0268 and 9F358. Raytheon is a large business. The original J&A, approved on July 23, 2014, supported an Indefinite-Delivery Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) contract on a sole source basis for the acquisition of Depot Level Repairable (DLR) and consumable spare parts associated with 176 specific Raytheon manufactured systems and/or system components. The J&A scope included an attachment, titled the “Add-On Process”, detailing the procedure for on-ramping items covered by an attached list of platforms, systems and subsystems for which Raytheon is the sole source Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM). J&A Addendum 1 was approved on June 29, 2016, for a scope increase to contract SPRBL1-15-D-0017.
  • PDF Versiyonu

    PDF Versiyonu

    ‹Ç‹NDEK‹LER 4 BAfiYAZI / Ardan ZENTÜRK 48 TEKNOLOJ‹ HABER Karadeniz: Siyasetin H›rç›n Yüzü 50 ÖZEL DOSYA / Emre TEK 8 SAVUNMA HABER Havadan Erken ‹hbar ve 18 ÖZEL HABER / Kudret KILIÇ, Ersin ÇAYIR Türkiye Savafl Gemisi ‹nflas›nda M‹LGEM ile S›n›f Atl›yor Kontrol Uçaklar› 24 ANAL‹Z / Sami ATALAN 62 HARP TAR‹H‹ / Prof. Dr. Mesut Hakk› CAfiIN Türk Komutanl›¤› Öncesi Afganistan’da Ortal›k Toz Duman Pasifik Muharebeleri Bölüm IV 28 ANAL‹Z / Kudret KILIÇ 66 DÜNYADAN / Naile ASLAN Orta ‹rtifa Düflmana Yasaklan›yor 68 STRATEJ‹ HABER / Ardan ZENTÜRK 36 ANAL‹Z / Can EREL Teknoloji Yo¤un Havac›l›k Faaliyetlerinin Diktatörlü¤ün Yeni Ad›: Petro-Devlet Konumlanmas› ve Yap›lanmas› Totaliterizm ‹çin “Tipik” Örnek: Özbekistan 42 ÖZEL HABER / Naile ASLAN Azerbaycan’da “Denge Politikas›”n›n Sonuna Do¤ru Afganistan’daki Dengelere Pekin Etkisi Yeni “Berlin Duvar›” Gürcistan’da Örülüyor 44 TSK HABER ‹ran’da Rusya ile Yeni Dönem 46 ÖZEL HABER / Can EREL Yenileflim Etkisinde Havac›l›k Kümeleri ve 74 ANAL‹Z / Burak ÇINAR 1’inci ‹zmir Havac›l›k Konferans› Vietnam Savafl›’nda Hava Muharebeleri ve Kay›plar I Military Science & Intelligence / MSI YAYIN Sorumlu Yaz› ‹flleri Müdürü Foto Muhabiri Genel Yay›n Yönetmeni Dr. A. Poyraz GÜRSON Petek ARICI ZAR‹F Yayg›n Süreli Yay›n [email protected] 2008 Ekim SAYI: 2008 - 036 Ümit BAYRAKTAR YAYIN KURULU [email protected] F›r›n Sok. fieren Apt. No:17/9 www.savunmahaber.com Teflvikiye/fiiflli/‹stanbul-TÜRK‹YE Prof. Dr. Süleyman TOLUN Genel Yay›n Koordinatörü Prof. Dr.