DOCSLIB.ORG

See FAR 2.101 & 3.104 Page 1 of 8 Addendum 2 to Ju

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
See FAR 2.101 & 3.104 Page 1 of 8 Addendum 2 to Ju DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY HEADQUARTERS 8725 JOHN J. KINGMAN ROAD FORT BELVOIR, VIRGINIA 22060-6221 Addendum 2 to Justification and Approval for Other than Full and Open Competition (SPRBL1-15-D-0017) 1. Contracting Activity: This Justification and Approval for Other than Full and Open Competition (J&A) Addendum 2 supports requirements generated by the Army, Air Force, Marine Corps, Navy, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), and Foreign Military Sales (FMS). The contracting activity for this requirement is DLA Land at Aberdeen, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD. 2. Description of the Action Being Approved: Contract SPRBL1-15-D-0017 was awarded to Raytheon Company – 350 Lowell Street Andover, Massachusetts, Cage code 05716, on September 28, 2015, on a firm-fixed-price basis including a three (3) year base followed by a three (3) year redeterminable option period. The contract anticipates performance by the following Raytheon Contractor and Government Entity (CAGE) codes: 05716; 15090; 37695; 96214; 072E5; 2M191; 3B150; 4U884; 7Y193; 00724; 06845; 49956; 54X10; 5D744; 4D494; K0268 and 9F358. Raytheon is a large business. The original J&A, approved on July 23, 2014, supported an Indefinite-Delivery Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) contract on a sole source basis for the acquisition of Depot Level Repairable (DLR) and consumable spare parts associated with 176 specific Raytheon manufactured systems and/or system components. The J&A scope included an attachment, titled the “Add-On Process”, detailing the procedure for on-ramping items covered by an attached list of platforms, systems and subsystems for which Raytheon is the sole source Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM). J&A Addendum 1 was approved on June 29, 2016, for a scope increase to contract SPRBL1-15-D-0017. This scope increase broadened DLA’s long-term strategic sourcing contract with Raytheon to encompass repairs, engineering services and associated data that are sole source to Raytheon. J&A Addendum 1 also authorized an increase in the base contract period from three (3) years to six (6) years, resulting in a nine (9) year contract. Additionally, the Government identified more systems for which Raytheon is the sole source OEM; therefore, J&A Addendum 1 expanded the number of platforms, systems and subsystems supported from 176 to 244. The contract contains DLAD 52.216-9006, Addition/Deletion of Items, to allow for the addition of items of supply and their associated services within the contract scope. Ultimately, the contract is expected to include all supplies and services identified as sole source to Raytheon in support of DoD weapon system requirements. This evolutionary Source Selection Information & Sensitive – See FAR 2.101 & 3.104 Page 1 of 8 Justification and Approval Addendum 2 SPRBL1-15-D-0017 acquisition approach assumes iterative contract modifications throughout the life of the contract to add on sole source requirements as they are identified. This J&A Addendum 2 authorizes an increase to the contract ceiling from to , expands the contract scope to include Performance Based Logistics (PBL), maintenance, training, and kit services, adds four additional systems to the scope of platforms, systems and subsystems supported, and revises the Add-On Procedures to more clearly document the process to add sole source Raytheon services to the contract. See Attachment 1 for revised Add-On Procedures, originally developed under the J&A from June 2014, which better aligns the procedures for processing services-related requirements, in addition to supplies. It also authorizes addition of other supplies and services demonstrated to be sole source to Raytheon in accordance with the procedures in Attachment 1. Presently, an increase to the ceiling is needed in order to ensure comprehensive sustainment and support of the critical sole source Raytheon Patriot system. Due to the value associated with adding Patriot projects (including the PBL) and various other projects to SPRBL1-15-D-0017, it is projected that a maximum contract ceiling is necessary in order to support the current nine-year contract duration. This ceiling authority will provide coverage for the previously added systems, and will provide the continued flexibility to on-ramp additional systems in the coming years. Funding will come from Defense-Wide working capital funds, Military Service working capital funds, Military Service procurement or operations and maintenance funding, as well as FMS funds. Approximately of the current contract ceiling remains, which is anticipated to be exhausted rapidly with the existing roadmap of systems to be on- ramped. The estimated total 9-year spend for projects already on contract is . The estimated total spend for the six Patriot projects that are in process for award during FY18/FY19 is . The estimated total spend for the eleven other non-Patriot projects in process for award in FY18 is . Additionally, is requested to support the 13 other identified prospective projects, as well as to allow for additional growth of the contract from 2019 thru 2024. A breakout of the projects and estimated values are shown in Table 1 below. This contract ceiling increase ensures authority to allow for the award of the Patriot and other projects identified in Table 1, and provides flexibility for future growth. Space left blank intentionally Source Selection Information & Sensitive – See FAR 2.101 & 3.104 Page 2 of 8 Justification and Approval Addendum 2 SPRBL1-15-D-0017 PBL services will provide cost effective weapon system support for Raytheon sole source systems where applicable and beneficial to the Government. These contract efforts are designed to deliver performance outcomes rather than a good or service. PBLs may be utilized as needed to support the sustainment of systems listed on Attachment 2 “List of Raytheon Sole Source Systems”. 4. Statutory Authority for Other than Full and Open Competition: Use of Other than Full and Open Competition is authorized by 10 U.S.C. 2304(c)(1) and FAR 6.302-1, as there is only one responsible source and no other supplies or services will satisfy agency requirements. The acquisition of current and future add-on projects is restricted to the prime contractor, Raytheon, for requirements in which they are verified to be the only source having the capability to furnish the required support. 5. Demonstration of the Contractor’s Unique Qualifications or Rationale for use of the Cited Statutory Authority: This J&A Addendum 2 supports adding projects which relate to sole source Raytheon systems, platforms and subsystems for which only Raytheon can provide the necessary support. Added projects will be verified sole source to Raytheon via the Attachment 1 Add-on Procedures before being solicited. The Government will evaluate all future add- ons, identifying each part/item/service and the system to which it belongs, and will verify through market research that the item is sole source. Only projects for which Raytheon is determined to be the only company possessing the requisite engineering expertise, data rights, configuration management, tooling, and/or management knowledge will be added. This process also ensures that complex weapon systems remain reliable and safe. PBL contract efforts are designed to deliver performance outcomes rather than a good or service. Given that the Government does not possess the technical data packages for these systems, the Government cannot solicit other contractors to integrate and manage these system readiness objectives for the sole source systems as a whole. Due to rapid technological changes and disruptive innovations, components may become outdated or reach end of life at any time. As the designer, developer, and manufacturer of supported items, only Raytheon is capable and qualified to provide the government with the required supplies and services and integrate these into the overall systems. Only Raytheon possesses the technical data required to upgrade current system architecture by performing obsolescence management or technical support. Additionally, for supplies, the Acquisition Method Code (AMC) and Acquisition Method Suffix Code (AMSC) assigned by the DOD will be used to support a conclusion that the item is sole source in accordance with DFARS PGI 217.7056 - Spare Parts Breakout Program, 2-201.1 Acquisition Method Codes, and 2-201.2 Acquisition Method Suffix Codes. If any item or service belonging to a system, platform, or subsystem is determined to be competitively available, it will not be awarded under this contract vehicle. If any item or Source Selection Information & Sensitive – See FAR 2.101 & 3.104 Page 4 of 8 Justification and Approval Addendum 2 SPRBL1-15-D-0017 service is determined to be competitively available after contract award it may be deleted from the contract and competitively re-solicited. 6. Market Research/Efforts to Obtain Competition (10 U.S.C. 2304(f)(3)(D)): Relative to the September 28, 2015, award of contract SPRBL1-15-D-0117, a special notice, in the form of a market survey, was posted on the Federal Business Opportunities (FedBizOpps) web page on March 25, 2014. This market survey outlined a brief scope of work, including information about the possibility of adding future phases. The survey listed questions regarding potential sources’ abilities to satisfy the requrement. No vendors responded. In accordance with FAR 5.201, the proposed action was synopsized in FedBizOpps on April 4, 2014. A synopsis posting a draft Request For Proposal (RFP) was issued through FedBizOpps on April 24, 2014. Raytheon was the only contractor to respond. The J&A was made available for public inspection via FedBizOpps after award, in accordance with FAR 6.305. Relative to J&A Addendum 1, a Sources Sought Announcement outlining the proposed scope expansion including the addition of three (3) base contract years, repair and engineering services was publicized on FedBizOpps on May 25, 2016. Raytheon was the only contractor to respond. A synopsis was posted on June 8, 2016, summarizing the anticipated contract modification. This J&A Addendum was made available for public inspection via FedBizOpps after contract modification.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RAYTHEON COMPANY (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter) ______
    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2019 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number 1-13699 ________________________________________________________________________________ RAYTHEON COMPANY (Exact name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter) ________________________________________________________________________________ Delaware 95-1778500 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 870 Winter Street, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code) (781) 522-3000 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) ________________________________________________________________________________ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.
    [Show full text]
  • SBX Sourcebook, Volume II
    An SBX Sourcebook, Volume II Version of 2012-05-13 Additional information for this sourcebook would be welcome. Please send it to [email protected] SBX ballasted down in stable “semi-submerged” operating position SBX-1 fully afloat and under way http://www.indeed.com/salary/q-Shift-Security-Lead-Sbx-l-Adak,-AK.html http://marinetraffic.com/ais/ Accessed 2012-05-11T14:32Z http://hosted.ap.org/specials/interactives/documents/nas_response.pdf April 30, 2012 Representative Michael R. Turner Chairman, Strategic Forces Subcommittee House Armed Services Committee Representative Loretta Sanchez Ranking Member House Armed Services Committee Dear Mr. Turner and Ms. Sanchez: We are pleased to provide the following responses to the twelve (12) questions you raised to us in your April 20 letter. Before doing so, however, it is appropriate to make clear that our responses are unclassified as you requested (i.e., some specific details have been omitted to avoid making this letter classified). Furthermore, our responses are based on the briefing we provided to your subcommittee on April 18, as well as the work of a National Research Council (NRC) committee1 which we co-chaired and helped prepare the NRC report entitled Making Sense of Ballistic Missile Defense: An Assessment of Concepts and Systems for U.S. Boost-Phase Missile Defense in Comparison to Other Alternatives which is undergoing final security classification review by the Missile Defense Agency (MDA). It is also appropriate to make clear that the committee examined ballistic missile defense (BMD) for the following limited missions for defense against attacks that could plausibly be mounted by “rogue states” in the next decade or so: (1) protection of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Raytheon Annual Report
    Focused on the Customer 2004 annual report Board of Directors ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ . . . . . , .** Chairman and CEO Institute Professor Chairman and Retired President and Chairman and Raytheon Company Massachusetts Institute of Chief Executive Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief Executive Officer Technology American Standard Data General Corporation Cypress International Inc. ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ Companies, Inc. ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ Retired General, U.S. Army . . ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ . Former Commander-in- International Business and President Emeritus . * Retired President and Chief of the United Nations Aviation Attorney California Institute of of Counsel Chief Executive Officer Command, Republic of ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ Technology Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Luminent, Inc. Korea/United States Wharton Garrison ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ Combined Forces/United - ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ . States Forces Korea Retired Chairman and . Partner Chief Executive Officer Chairman Stuntz, Davis Staffier, P.C. *Lead Director Cabot Industrial Trust EMC Corporation **Retiring effective “2004 was a strong year with May 4, 2005 record orders of $25.7 billion; sales Leadership Team of $20.2 billion – a 12% increase Clockwise from upper left: Rebecca R. Rhoads, Jay B. Stephens, Donald M. Ronchi, Charles E. Franklin, Keith J. Peden, John D. Harris II, Edward S. Pliner, Thomas M. Culligan,
    [Show full text]
  • Innovation in All Domains. Raytheon in the United Kingdom
    Raytheon in the United Kingdom: Raytheon UK Innovation in all domains. 5th Floor, Harman House 1 George Street Uxbridge, Middlesex UB8 1QQ United Kingdom [email protected] www.raytheon.co .uk Cleared for public release. Copyright © 2011 Raytheon Company. All rights reserved. “ Customer Success Is Our Mission” is a registered trademark of Raytheon Company.. “ Raytheon Six Sigma” is a registered trademark of Raytheon Company.. “ Clear View” is a registered trademark of Raytheon Company.. From the Chief Executive Today Raytheon in the UK employs more than In air traffic management, Raytheon in the UK 1,200 people at six sites. Our engineers and has an unbroken heritage stretching back to the scientists are leading the way in designing, first British radar trials in the 1930s. Our developing and manufacturing innovative Monopulse Secondary Surveillance Radar is the solutions for our customers in different industries, most successful radar of its type in the world, with businesses and governments. Raytheon brings to more than 500 systems in service in 43 countries, the UK and Europe proven U.S. technology, and we have a large number of new systems on leveraging established products and skills. order from the U.S. and other countries. We have numerous relationships with industrial and research partners which enable us to play an Continuous development of our people and improvement to our processes ensures that as a BOB DELORGE important role as a major technology exporter to more than 40 countries. business we add operational capability to our Chief Executive & customers and ultimately a competitive advantage Managing Director. Raytheon’s UK operations are recognised for the to British industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections on Apollo
    SPACE CHRONICLE A BRITISH INTERPLANETARY SOCIETY PUBLICATION Vol. 72 No.3 2019 REFLECTIONS ON APOLLO At the sharp end of STILETTO TIANGONG-2 TUKHACHEVSKY operations Soviet rocket pioneer ISBN 978-0-9567382-2-6 SEPTEMBER 20191 Submitting papers to From the editor SPACE CHRONICLE THIS, MY PENULTIMATE ISSUE as editor of Space Chronicle, contains four widely differing papers. Space Chronicle welcomes the submission for publication of technical articles of general The first is a brief biography of Marshall Tukhachevsky, a military man, who was interest, historical contributions and reviews also influential in the development of Russian rocketry in the 1930s before he met in space science and technology, astronautics an untimely end in the Stalin purges. This is authored by two Russian historians and related fields. and is a new venture for Chronicle, reaching out beyond the normal sources.. The second paper – authored by David Baker, editor of the BIS’s SpaceFlight GUIDELINES FOR AUTHORS magazine – is the story of his work on the Apollo programme. It is, as the author ■ As concise as the content allows – says, “a summary of one person’s experience of what it was like for a British born typically 5,000 to 6,000 words. Shorter in that great adventure”. papers will also be considered. Longer papers will only be considered in The third, authored by Phillip Clark, a pioneer in documenting Soviet and exceptional circumstances and, at the Chinese space activities, looks at the mission of the Chinese orbiting laboratory - discretion of the Editor, may be split into Tiangong 2 – during 2018 and 2019 until its planned de-orbit in July 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 239/Friday, December 11, 2020
    Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 239 / Friday, December 11, 2020 / Notices 80069 assistance, engineering and logistics warfighting effectiveness as needed, 2. The highest level of classification of support services, and other related which can counter or deter aggressions defense articles, components, and elements of logistics support. by demonstrated precision against services included in this potential sale (vi) Military Department: Navy (TW– surface targets. This capability will is CONFIDENTIAL. P–LIB) easily integrate into existing force 3. If a technologically advanced (v) Prior Related Cases, if any: None infrastructure as it will only improve adversary were to obtain knowledge of (vi) Sales Commission, Fee, etc., Paid, defense against opposing threats. The the hardware and software elements, the Offered, or Agreed to be Paid: None recipient will have no difficulty information could be used to develop (vii) Sensitivity of Technology absorbing these systems into its armed countermeasures or equivalent systems, Contained in the Defense Article or forces. which might reduce system Defense Services Proposed to be Sold: The proposed sale of this equipment effectiveness or be used in the See Attached Annex and support will not alter the basic development of a system with similar or (viii) Date Report Delivered to military balance in the region. advanced capabilities. Congress: October 21, 2020 The principal contractor will be the 4. A determination has been made *As defined in Section 47(6) of the Boeing Company, St. Louis, MO. There that the recipient can provide Arms Export Control Act. are no known offset agreements substantially the same degree of proposed in connection with this protection for the sensitive technology POLICY JUSTIFICATION potential sale.
    [Show full text]
  • The Raytheon Companycurrent (NYSE: Price RTN $116.96)
    Krause Fund Research Spring 2020 April 4, 2020 Aerospace and Defense The Raytheon CompanyCurrent (NYSE: Price RTN $116.96) Recommendation: Buy April 4 , 20 April20 2, 2020 Analysts Current Price $116.92 Yichen (Ethan) Sun Target Price $195-$215 [email protected] William Braverman Investment Thesis [email protected] Glei Hoxhalli We recommend a buy rating for Raytheon because the current [email protected] stock price does not adequately reflect the outlook for the company. We believe the stock prices recent decline was due to Company Overview the adverse market conditions created by the Covid-19 virus. This decline fails to consider Raytheon’s ability to weather this storm Raytheon is one of the world’s largest defense contractors, due to the long-term nature of their contracts, and the extent of with five main business segments providing products and their backlog. services to domestic and international customers. Raytheon was founded in Delaware in 1922 and has seen continuous Drivers of Thesis: growth. The company focuses on developing missile • Raytheon’s current corporate strategy to automate its systems, surveillance and radar solutions, and advanced manufacturing process, and merge with United space technology. Raytheon has grown to be large enough Technology will decrease their costs and increase to service the U.S Armed Forces and many of its allied margins. nations. On April 2, 2020, the company merged with United • Increase in backlog order from 2018 will cushion the Technologies Corporation to form Raytheon Technologies effect of COVID-19 crisis. and is now listed on the NYSE as RTX. Risks of Thesis: • Recent plunge in oil price will lead to weaker demand Stock Performance Highlights from Middle Easter customers, which drives roughly 52 week High $233.48 half of Raytheon’s international sales.
    [Show full text]
  • RAYTHEON COMPANY (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended June 29, 2008. ¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number 1-13699 RAYTHEON COMPANY (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 95-1778500 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 870 Winter Street, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (781) 522-3000 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller Smaller reporting company ¨ reporting company) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
    [Show full text]
  • Rocketry Index a “Catalog” of All the Hobby Rockets
    and Present The Rocketry Index A “Catalog” of all the hobby rockets... ever! (or at least as many as I could manage!) Compiled and Edited by John A. Lee OSL Revision: 13.01 Contents Introductory Materials............................................................... 43 What Is “The Rocketry Index?”........................................................43 What Gets Included With the Rockets ..............................................45 What Gets Included With the Companies .........................................47 Company Information .................................................................................... 47 Company Statement ....................................................................................... 47 Rocketeers’ Views of the Companies.............................................................. 47 Master Lists ................................................................................................... 47 Family Groups...................................................................................49 Patriarchal Families ...................................................................................... 49 Always Ready Rocketry Families ..................................................................... 50 ARR Basic Blues Family .................................................................................................... 50 Art Applewhite Families ................................................................................... 50 Applewhite Cinco Family .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 40636R AIM-9X.Qxp 7/2/2004 10:09 AM Page 1
    40636R AIM-9X.qxp 7/2/2004 10:09 AM Page 1 AIM-9X Sidewinder AIM-9X The world’s best dogfight missile for the world’s best fighter pilots. AIM-9X Sidewinder warfighter has offensive firepower components (rocket motor, Benefits The AIM-9X is the latest member that is unparalleled to any other warhead and fuze), this evolutionary Q Low cost of development and of the AIM-9 Sidewinder short- weapon systems in the world design is a low cost, low risk AUR ownership range missile family currently in today. The AIM-9X program with robust performance. The use by more than 40 nations addresses the requirement for digital design architecture of the Q Superior performance exceeds tactical requirement throughout the world. This next evolutionary improvements to the AIM-9X provides inherent growth generation Sidewinder Missile is AIM-9 series missile through capability to ensure air superiority Q Leader in advanced IR missiles currently in its fifth year of a revolutionary advancements. This in the future. and weapon systems integration 6-year Engineering and Manu- extends the operational effectiveness facturing Development (E&MD) of existing inventories at an AIM-9X is a joint U.S. Navy and contract. Additionally, AIM-9X affordable cost while continuing U.S. Air Force program with the has been approved for low rate the evolution of the AIM-9 series. Navy designated as the Executive production and awarded its first AIM-9X provides the warfighter Service. The Air Force plans to buy low rate initial production with the following capabilities: 5,080 and the Navy 5,000 AIM-9X contract in November 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Raytheon 2007 Annual Report
    Raytheon 2007 Annual Report Raytheon Company Raytheon 2007 Annual Report 870 Winter Street Waltham, Massachusetts 02451-1449 USA www.raytheon.com rray_version_03-31-08_Press_Cover.indday_version_03-31-08_Press_Cover.indd OCVRSOCVRS 44/3/08/3/08 22:23:00:23:00 AAMM Raytheon Financial Highlights Years ended December 31 2005 2006 2007 In millions, except per share amounts Backlog $ 31,528 $ 33,838 $ 36,614 Sales 18,491 19,707 21,301 Operating Income 1,619 1,944 2,328 1 Income from Continuing Operations (Adjusted in 2007) 898 1,187 1,474 1 Diluted EPS from Continuing Operations (Adjusted in 2007) 1.98 2.63 3.31 Operating Cash Flow from Continuing Operations 2,352 2,477 1,249 Dividends Declared per Share 0.88 0.96 1.02 Debt to Capital 29.3 % 26.3 % 15.3 % 2 1 Return on Invested Capital (Adjusted in 2007) 6.5 % 8.3 % 9.5 % BACKLOG NET SALES OPERATING INCOME ROIC2 In billions, except percentages $36.6 $21.3 $2.3 9.5% 8.3% $33.8 $19.7 $1.9 $31.5 $18.5 6.5% $1.6 $29.9 5.4% $17.4 4.9% $1.3 $1.3 $15.6 $25.3 03 04 05 06 07 03 04 05 06 07 03 04 05 06 07 03 04 05 06 07 1 Excludes $219 million or $0.49 per diluted share tax-related benefit as described on page 39 of the Form 10K included within this report. 2007 Income from Continuing Operations was $1,693 million and 2007 Diluted EPS from Continuing Operations was $3.80.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea-Based X-Band Radar (SBX) for Missile Defense
    Sea-Based X-Band Radar (SBX) for Missile Defense SBX — Sensor for the Ground-Based Midcourse Defense System Key Features and Benefits The Sea-Based X-Band (SBX) Radar or XBR) is being Raytheon developed the XBR radar is a midcourse fire con- designed, built and tested from lessons learned on earlier g State-of-the-art technology trol sensor for the Ground- by Raytheon. “Family of Radars” programs, combined with comprehensive Based Midcourse Defense including the Ground-Based XBR is a mechanically-slewed software functionality result (GMD) component of the Radar – Prototype (GBR-P), phased array sensor that uses in the world’s most capable Ballistic Missile Defense located at Kwajalein in the Sea-Based X-Band radar the most advanced electronic System. Installed on a Republic of the Marshall components and software. Its g Optimized for threat acquisi- re-locatable semi-submersible Islands, and the Terminal high output power, along with tion, tracking, discrimination platform for siting flexibility, High Altitude Area Defense sophisticated signal detection and hit assessment the radar performs the critical (THAAD) radar. Through algorithms, allow the radar to functions of cued acquisition, continued design and pro- g Self-propelled, semi-sub- accomplish its mission against target tracking, discrimination ducibility enhancements many mersible platform affords a host of very small targets and outstanding stability during and engagement hit assess- of the radar components have at very long ranges. To protect elevated sea-state conditions ment. By providing the radar realized significant perform- the radar from the anticipated with a sea-borne mobility, this ance improvements while g Relocation capability maximizes harsh environments, an air- sensor can be deployed to undergoing reductions in siting flexibility and operational supported radome was devel- support either GMD system both cost and risk.
    [Show full text]