DOCSLIB.ORG

Transforming Tomorrow 2018 2018 Annual Report Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transforming Tomorrow 2018 2018 Annual Report Annual Report Raytheon Transforming Tomorrow 2018 2018 Annual Report Annual Report Raytheon.com @Raytheon Raytheon @RaytheonCompany Raytheon 2019 Proxy Statement 2018 Annual Report 2018 Corporate Responsibility Report For further information about Raytheon, we invite you to review our Raytheon Company investor communications at https://www.raytheon.com 870 Winter Street Waltham, Massachusetts 02451-1449 USA © 2019 Raytheon Company. All rights reserved. Approved for public release. F-35 is a registered trademark of Lockheed Martin Corporation; Patriot is a registered trademark of the United States Department of the Army; Sidewinder is a trademark of the United States Department of the Navy; GROWLER is a trademark of Growler Manufacturing and Engineering; Raytheon, Raytheon in red block letters, SM-3, TOW, AMRAAM, MALD and Coyote are registered trademarks of Raytheon Company, and StormBreaker, InSITE and PAX are trademarks of Raytheon Company. Designed by Addison 350625_RTN_AR18_Covers_R4.indd 1-3 4/9/19 7:33 AM TRANSFORMING TOMORROW Breakthrough technologies have been the driving force behind national security, economic strength and social cohesion. And they will continue to transform tomorrow. At Raytheon, we’re continually pushing the boundaries of technology, working at the forefront of quantum physics, artificial intelligence and machine learning, hypersonics, cybersecurity and much more. Together, we’re advancing defense strategy, protecting people and infrastructure through proven solutions that make the world a safer place — ​faster than ever before. RAYTHEON 2018 ANNUAL REPORT 1 2018 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31 In millions, except per share amounts 2016 2017 2018 Backlog $36,709 $38,210 $42,420 Net sales 24,124 25,348 27,058 $42.4B RECORD BACKLOG Operating income1 3,896 4,231 4,538 Diluted EPS from continuing operations 7.55 6.94 10.15 Operating cash flow from continuing operations 2,852 2,747 3,428 Dividends declared per share 2.93 3.19 3.47 $32.2B In billions, except per share amounts RECORD BOOKINGS Net Sales Operating Income1 $27.1 $4.5 $27.1B RECORD NET SALES (UP 6.7%) ‘14 ‘15 ‘16 ‘17 ‘18 ‘14 ‘15 ‘16 ‘17 ‘18 Diluted EPS From Continuing Dividends Declared Per Share Operations $10.15 $3.47 $3.4B RECORD OPERATING CASH FLOW ‘14 ‘15 ‘16 ‘17 ‘18 ‘14 ‘15 ‘16 ‘17 ‘18 1 Amounts reflect the impact of the adoption of ASU 2017-07, Compensation — Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost, in the first quarter of 2018. See “Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” within Item 8 of our 2018 Form 10-K for additional information. 2 RAYTHEON 2018 ANNUAL REPORT “Raytheon achieved accelerated sales growth for the fourth consecutive year and set a number of company records in backlog, bookings, sales and cash flow.” Thomas A. Kennedy Chairman and Chief Executive Officer FOUR-PILLAR GROWTH STRATEGY Build Focus Extend Engage upon our areas of additional resources on Raytheon cyber key countries as strength within our emerging opportunities solutions beyond the individual markets with key mission areas within the Department U.S. government multiple customers of Defense market RAYTHEON 2018 ANNUAL REPORT 3 DEAR FELLOW SHAREHOLDERS, Over the past several years, Raytheon has successfully navigated U.S. government budgetary headwinds, returned to growth and invested in the company’s future. Many customer budgets have since stabilized and increased, opening new opportunities and turning our focus toward emerging technologies and modernization capabilities. I’m pleased to report that in 2018 Raytheon’s global team took advantage of these opportunities while continuing to execute our growth strategy. As a result, the company posted a very successful year on behalf of our shareholders and customers. In 2018, Raytheon achieved accelerated sales growth for the fourth consecutive year and set $27.1B a number of company records, including net sales of $27.1 billion, which was a 6.7 percent NET SALES IN 2018 year-over-year increase. Our earnings per share from continuing operations was $10.15, and our operating cash flow from continuing operations was a record $3.4 billion, even after making a $1.25 billion pretax discretionary pension contribution. Continued strong global demand for our innovative solutions drove full-year bookings to a record high of $32.2 billion. Our backlog grew to $42.4 billion at the end of 2018, representing another record and a $4.2 billion increase over the prior year. These financial accomplishments position Raytheon for a strong 2019 and beyond. $10.15 Balanced Capital Deployment DILUTED EPS FROM Our strong cash flow and balance sheet provide us with financial flexibility. We remain focused CONTINUING OPERATIONS on deploying capital in ways that create value for our shareholders and customers, including making strategic internal investments that support our continued growth, paying a sustainable and competitive dividend, reducing our share count, making targeted acquisitions that fit our technology and global growth needs, and making discretionary contributions to fund our pension obligations from time to time. Of particular note, Raytheon in 2018 increased its 4 RAYTHEON 2018 ANNUAL REPORT dividend by 8.8 percent, marking the 14th consecutive year with an increase. The company also repurchased 6.7 million shares of common stock for $1.3 billion. Investing in the Future VISION A highlight of our 2018 results was the strength of our classified business, where we achieved One global team record levels of bookings and sales. Classified bookings were up 46 percent year-over-year, creating trusted, to almost $7 billion; classified sales increased 19 percent and also represented 19 percent of innovative solutions total company sales in 2018. to make the world These increases were largely driven by the need of our domestic customers to address a safer place. advanced peer threats as outlined in both the National Defense Strategy and the Missile Defense Review. Raytheon remains well-aligned to both of these documents, which emphasize capabilities such as high-energy lasers, high-power microwaves, space, hypersonics and counter-hypersonics, next-generation sensors and cybersecurity. Classified business is crucial for Raytheon’s growth and success; it is our seed corn, often funding next-generation technology development that leads to production awards and “Our dividend per opportunities to create future franchise programs. These are the advanced solution sets for share grew by which we expect longer-term customer demand, both domestically and internationally. 8.8%, increasing Continuous Innovation We believe that the alignment of our broad mix of technologies, domain expertise and for the 14th key capabilities with customer needs, and our focus on creating cost-effective, best-value consecutive year.” solutions, enabled us to win a number of new franchise awards in 2018. Raytheon’s Naval Strike Missile was chosen by the U.S. Navy as its new over-the-horizon weapon system. Raytheon was also selected to develop and deliver the next-generation electro-optical distributed aperture system, or EO-DAS, for the F-35®, as well as additional classified franchises that will help the U.S. maintain its operational and technical dominance. In addition to developing the solutions of tomorrow, Raytheon also embraces a culture of RECORD CLASSIFIED continuous innovation that allows us to refresh the technology in our current franchises, BOOKINGS OF thereby creating new franchises. By disrupting ourselves, we are making the investments NEARLY needed to keep our franchises relevant and generating value for decades to come. International Growth $7B Raytheon’s continued topline growth has also been driven by our ongoing focus on broadening the international marketplace for our franchises, particularly as nations look to protect their borders and sovereignty. Demand signals for our suite of deterrence capabilities, particularly our combat-proven Patriot® Air and Missile Defense System remain strong across Europe, the Middle East and North Africa and the Asia-Pacific regions. In 2018, we booked four major Patriot production awards totaling almost $4 billion, including bookings from three new countries: Romania, Poland and Sweden. In addition, Raytheon’s international sales in 2018 increased for the 15th consecutive year. RAYTHEON 2018 ANNUAL REPORT 5 A Legacy of Innovation One of the foundations of our success is our legacy of innovation. Raytheon has a long, proud VALUES history as a global technology leader. For generations, our global team has been pushing the bounds of what’s possible, a tradition that continues today. This resulted in Raytheon being fortunate enough to earn U.S. Patent No. 10,000,000, which was signed during a White House ceremony. That patent, for an innovation involving laser radars, is one of more than 13,000 active Raytheon patents. Trust But just as important as innovation is Raytheon’s culture of integrity, our insistence on We take pride in our ethical culture, achieving results the right way and ensuring the company operates in a manner consistent are honest and do the right thing. with our values. As we position the company for long-term success, and welcome the next generation of talent, it’s a business imperative to ensure Raytheon is a diverse and inclusive workplace. When people put on the Raytheon badge, we want them to feel they are treated with trust and respect; that they can bring their whole selves to work; and are ready to develop the innovative solutions our customers need. Respect We are inclusive, embrace diverse This approach starts at the top, with strong engagement from the board of directors, perspectives and value the role and their focus on sound corporate governance and a strategic approach to corporate we all play in our shared vision. responsibility. Adding three talented female directors in 2018 greatly enhanced the board’s leadership, expertise and diversity, with women now representing 36 percent of our board.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 11Th Australian Space Forum Wednesday 31 March 2021 Adelaide, South Australia
    11th Australian Space Forum Wednesday 31 March 2021 Adelaide, South Australia 11th Australian Space Forum a 11th Australian Space Forum Wednesday 31 March 2021 Adelaide, South Australia Major Sponsor Supported by b 11th Australian Space Forum c Contents Welcome from the Chair of The Andy Thomas Space Foundation The Andy Thomas Space Foundation is delighted to welcome you to the 11th Australian Space Forum. Contents 11th Australian Space Forum The Foundation will be working with partners Wednesday 31 March 2021 1 Welcome and sponsors, including the Australian Space Adelaide, South Australia — Chair of The Andy Thomas Agency, on an ambitious agenda of projects Space Foundation to advance space education and outreach. Adelaide Convention Centre, — Premier of South Australia We are reaching out to friends and supporters North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia — Head of the Australian who have a shared belief in the power of Forum sessions: Hall C Space Agency education, the pursuit of excellence and a Exhibition: Hall H commitment to diversity and inclusion. We 6 Message from the CEO The Foundation was established in 2020 for look forward to conversations during the 8 Forum Schedule the purpose of advancing space education, Forum – as well as ongoing interaction - about raising space awareness and contributing our shared interests and topics of importance 11 Speaker Profiles to the national space community. We to the national space community. are delighted that the South Australian 28 Company Profiles We hope you enjoy the 11th Australian Government has entrusted us with the future Space Forum. 75 Foundation Corporate Sponsors conduct of the Australian Space Forum – and Professional Partners Australia’s most significant space industry Michael Davis AO meeting – and we intend to ensure that the Chair, Andy Thomas Space Foundation 76 Venue Map Forum continues to be the leading national 77 Exhibition Floorplan platform for the highest quality information and discussion about space industry topics.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Jurisdiction in OSHA, Region 10 Version 2018.2
    Guide to Jurisdiction in OSHA, Region 10 Version 2018.2 General Principles - Federal civilian employers are covered by OSHA throughout the four-state region. State, county, municipal and other non-federal public employers (except tribal government employers) are covered by state programs in Washington, Oregon, and Alaska. There is no state program in Idaho, and OSHA’s coverage of public employers in Idaho is limited to the federal sector. OSHA regulates most private employers in Idaho with exceptions noted below. Industry / Location State Coverage OSHA Coverage Air Carriers1 Washington, Oregon and Alaska: Air Washington, Oregon and Alaska: carrier operations on the ground only. Aircraft cabin crewmembers’ exposures to only hazardous chemicals (HAZCOM), bloodborne pathogens, noise, recordkeeping, and access to employee exposure and medical records. Idaho: Air carrier operations on the ground. Aircraft cabin crewmembers’ exposures to only hazardous chemicals (HAZCOM), bloodborne pathogens, noise, recordkeeping, and access to employee exposure and medical records. Commercial Diving Washington, Oregon and Alaska: Washington, Oregon, and Alaska: Employers with diving operations staged Employers with diving operations from shore, piers, docks or other fixed staged from boats or other vessels afloat locations. on navigable waters 2. Idaho: All diving operations for covered employers. 1 The term “air carrier refers to private employers engaged in air transportation of passengers and/or cargo. The term “aircraft cabin crew member” refers to employees working in the cabin during flight such as flight attendants or medical staff; however, the term does not include pilots. 2 In the state of Washington, for vessels afloat, such as boats, ships and barges moored at a pier or dock, DOSH’s jurisdiction ends at the edge of the dock or pier and OSHA’s jurisdiction begins at the foot of the gangway or other means of access to the vessel; this principle applies to all situations involving moored vessels, including construction, longshoring, and ship repair.
    [Show full text]
  • RAYTHEON COMPANY (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter) ______
    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2019 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number 1-13699 ________________________________________________________________________________ RAYTHEON COMPANY (Exact name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter) ________________________________________________________________________________ Delaware 95-1778500 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 870 Winter Street, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code) (781) 522-3000 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) ________________________________________________________________________________ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.
    [Show full text]
  • SBX Sourcebook, Volume II
    An SBX Sourcebook, Volume II Version of 2012-05-13 Additional information for this sourcebook would be welcome. Please send it to [email protected] SBX ballasted down in stable “semi-submerged” operating position SBX-1 fully afloat and under way http://www.indeed.com/salary/q-Shift-Security-Lead-Sbx-l-Adak,-AK.html http://marinetraffic.com/ais/ Accessed 2012-05-11T14:32Z http://hosted.ap.org/specials/interactives/documents/nas_response.pdf April 30, 2012 Representative Michael R. Turner Chairman, Strategic Forces Subcommittee House Armed Services Committee Representative Loretta Sanchez Ranking Member House Armed Services Committee Dear Mr. Turner and Ms. Sanchez: We are pleased to provide the following responses to the twelve (12) questions you raised to us in your April 20 letter. Before doing so, however, it is appropriate to make clear that our responses are unclassified as you requested (i.e., some specific details have been omitted to avoid making this letter classified). Furthermore, our responses are based on the briefing we provided to your subcommittee on April 18, as well as the work of a National Research Council (NRC) committee1 which we co-chaired and helped prepare the NRC report entitled Making Sense of Ballistic Missile Defense: An Assessment of Concepts and Systems for U.S. Boost-Phase Missile Defense in Comparison to Other Alternatives which is undergoing final security classification review by the Missile Defense Agency (MDA). It is also appropriate to make clear that the committee examined ballistic missile defense (BMD) for the following limited missions for defense against attacks that could plausibly be mounted by “rogue states” in the next decade or so: (1) protection of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory Numbers Are Total Active Inventory figures As of Sept
    Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory numbers are total active inventory figures as of Sept. 30, 2014. By Aaron M. U. Church, Associate Editor I 2015 USAF Almanac BOMBER AIRCRAFT flight controls actuate trailing edge surfaces that combine aileron, elevator, and rudder functions. New EHF satcom and high-speed computer upgrade B-1 Lancer recently entered full production. Both are part of the Defensive Management Brief: A long-range bomber capable of penetrating enemy defenses and System-Modernization (DMS-M). Efforts are underway to develop a new VLF delivering the largest weapon load of any aircraft in the inventory. receiver for alternative comms. Weapons integration includes the improved COMMENTARY GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator and JASSM-ER and future weapons The B-1A was initially proposed as replacement for the B-52, and four pro- such as GBU-53 SDB II, GBU-56 Laser JDAM, JDAM-5000, and LRSO. Flex- totypes were developed and tested in 1970s before program cancellation in ible Strike Package mods will feed GPS data to the weapons bays to allow 1977. The program was revived in 1981 as B-1B. The vastly upgraded aircraft weapons to be guided before release, to thwart jamming. It also will move added 74,000 lb of usable payload, improved radar, and reduced radar cross stores management to a new integrated processor. Phase 2 will allow nuclear section, but cut maximum speed to Mach 1.2. The B-1B first saw combat in and conventional weapons to be carried simultaneously to increase flexibility. Iraq during Desert Fox in December 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • USAF USAF Weapons 2008 USAF Almanac by Susan H.H
    Gallery of USAF USAF Weapons 2008 USAF Almanac By Susan H.H. Young Note: Inventory numbers are total active inventory figures as of Sept. 30, 2007. Bombers B-1 Lancer Brief: A long-range, air refuelable multirole bomber capable of flying missions over intercontinental range, then penetrating enemy defenses with the largest pay- load of guided and unguided weapons in the Air Force inventory. Function: Long-range conventional bomber. Operator: ACC, AFMC. First Flight: Dec. 23, 1974 (B-1A); Oct. 18, 1984 (B-1B). Delivered: June 1985-May 1988. IOC: Oct. 1, 1986, Dyess AFB, Tex. (B-1B). Production: 104. Inventory: 67. Unit Location: Dyess AFB, Tex., Ellsworth AFB, S.D., Edwards AFB, Calif. Contractor: Boeing; AIL Systems; General Electric. Power Plant: four General Electric F101-GE-102 turbo- fans, each 30,780 lb thrust. B-1B Lancer (Richard VanderMeulen) Accommodation: four, pilot, copilot, and two systems officers (offensive and defensive), on zero/zero ACES II ejection seats. B-1B. Initiated in 1981, the first production model of Unit Location: Whiteman AFB, Mo. Dimensions: span spread 137 ft, swept aft 79 ft, length the improved variant B-1 flew in October 1984. USAF Contractor: Northrop Grumman; Boeing; Vought. 146 ft, height 34 ft. produced a total of 100. The active B-1B inventory was Power Plant: four General Electric F118-GE-100 turbo- Weights: empty equipped 192,000 lb, max operating reduced to 67 aircraft (from the remaining 92) with con- fans, each 17,300 lb thrust. weight 477,000 lb. solidation to two main operating bases within Air Combat Accommodation: two, mission commander and pilot, Ceiling: more than 30,000 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Raytheon Annual Report
    Focused on the Customer 2004 annual report Board of Directors ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ . . . . . , .** Chairman and CEO Institute Professor Chairman and Retired President and Chairman and Raytheon Company Massachusetts Institute of Chief Executive Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief Executive Officer Technology American Standard Data General Corporation Cypress International Inc. ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ Companies, Inc. ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ Retired General, U.S. Army . . ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ . Former Commander-in- International Business and President Emeritus . * Retired President and Chief of the United Nations Aviation Attorney California Institute of of Counsel Chief Executive Officer Command, Republic of ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ Technology Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Luminent, Inc. Korea/United States Wharton Garrison ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ Combined Forces/United - ․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․․ . States Forces Korea Retired Chairman and . Partner Chief Executive Officer Chairman Stuntz, Davis Staffier, P.C. *Lead Director Cabot Industrial Trust EMC Corporation **Retiring effective “2004 was a strong year with May 4, 2005 record orders of $25.7 billion; sales Leadership Team of $20.2 billion – a 12% increase Clockwise from upper left: Rebecca R. Rhoads, Jay B. Stephens, Donald M. Ronchi, Charles E. Franklin, Keith J. Peden, John D. Harris II, Edward S. Pliner, Thomas M. Culligan,
    [Show full text]
  • Innovation in All Domains. Raytheon in the United Kingdom
    Raytheon in the United Kingdom: Raytheon UK Innovation in all domains. 5th Floor, Harman House 1 George Street Uxbridge, Middlesex UB8 1QQ United Kingdom [email protected] www.raytheon.co .uk Cleared for public release. Copyright © 2011 Raytheon Company. All rights reserved. “ Customer Success Is Our Mission” is a registered trademark of Raytheon Company.. “ Raytheon Six Sigma” is a registered trademark of Raytheon Company.. “ Clear View” is a registered trademark of Raytheon Company.. From the Chief Executive Today Raytheon in the UK employs more than In air traffic management, Raytheon in the UK 1,200 people at six sites. Our engineers and has an unbroken heritage stretching back to the scientists are leading the way in designing, first British radar trials in the 1930s. Our developing and manufacturing innovative Monopulse Secondary Surveillance Radar is the solutions for our customers in different industries, most successful radar of its type in the world, with businesses and governments. Raytheon brings to more than 500 systems in service in 43 countries, the UK and Europe proven U.S. technology, and we have a large number of new systems on leveraging established products and skills. order from the U.S. and other countries. We have numerous relationships with industrial and research partners which enable us to play an Continuous development of our people and improvement to our processes ensures that as a BOB DELORGE important role as a major technology exporter to more than 40 countries. business we add operational capability to our Chief Executive & customers and ultimately a competitive advantage Managing Director. Raytheon’s UK operations are recognised for the to British industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded April 22, 2006
    SIX DECADES OF GUIDED MUNITIONS AND BATTLE NETWORKS: PROGRESS AND PROSPECTS Barry D. Watts Thinking Center for Strategic Smarter and Budgetary Assessments About Defense www.csbaonline.org Six Decades of Guided Munitions and Battle Networks: Progress and Prospects by Barry D. Watts Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments March 2007 ABOUT THE CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND BUDGETARY ASSESSMENTS The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments (CSBA) is an independent, nonprofit, public policy research institute established to make clear the inextricable link between near-term and long- range military planning and defense investment strategies. CSBA is directed by Dr. Andrew F. Krepinevich and funded by foundations, corporations, government, and individual grants and contributions. This report is one in a series of CSBA analyses on the emerging military revolution. Previous reports in this series include The Military-Technical Revolution: A Preliminary Assessment (2002), Meeting the Anti-Access and Area-Denial Challenge (2003), and The Revolution in War (2004). The first of these, on the military-technical revolution, reproduces the 1992 Pentagon assessment that precipitated the 1990s debate in the United States and abroad over revolutions in military affairs. Many friends and professional colleagues, both within CSBA and outside the Center, have contributed to this report. Those who made the most substantial improvements to the final manuscript are acknowledged below. However, the analysis and findings are solely the responsibility of the author and CSBA. 1667 K Street, NW, Suite 900 Washington, DC 20036 (202) 331-7990 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEGEMENTS .................................................. v SUMMARY ............................................................... ix GLOSSARY ………………………………………………………xix I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................... 1 Guided Munitions: Origins in the 1940s............. 3 Cold War Developments and Prospects ............
    [Show full text]
  • Andrew Whittaker
    Raytheon Australia 4 Brindabella Cct Brindabella Park Canberra Airport, ACT 2609 Andrew Whittaker General Manager Above Water Systems Andrew Whittaker is the General Manager of the Above Water Systems Product Line for Raytheon Australia. In this role he is accountable for Raytheon Australia’s performance on a range of maritime programs, including the complex multi-billion dollar Air Warfare Destroyer (AWD) Program. With skilled resources in Adelaide, Sydney and Perth, he is responsible for the sustainment and growth of Raytheon Australia’s surface ships capability, including Combat System integration, enterprise services, sustainment and training services. Andrew has over 33 years experience as a professional engineer, including 23 years experience in senior leadership positions. He has an extensive background in project management, systems engineering, and in the, specification, development, and implementation of electronics and software based systems. He joined Raytheon Australia in 2005 as Engineering Director in the Naval Systems Business Unit and has served as a member of AWD Alliance Management Team since 2007. He held the Navy delegation as the senior engineer on the AWD Program between 2007 and 2017. Andrew started his professional career in 1987 with Cossor Electronics (a Raytheon company) as an electronics design engineer. In 1991 he migrated from the UK to Australia joining Stanilite and then ADI Limited (now Thales). He was responsible for the design and development of communications switching systems that were integrated into the ANZAC frigates, Military Air Traffic Control systems and Cellular telephony systems exported to PNG and China. He was also the technical lead for the JTFHQ integration into HMAS Manoora and a number of other successful projects and bids.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 78, No. 193/Friday, October 4, 2013/Notices
    Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 193 / Friday, October 4, 2013 / Notices 61851 11. Type of Information Collection this collection contact Anitra Johnson at would constitute a clearly unwarranted Request: Reinstatement without change 410–786–0609). invasion of personal privacy. of a previously approved collection; 13. Type of Information Collection Name of Committee: National Human Title of Information Collection: Request: Extension of a currently Genome Research Institute Special Emphasis Medicare Geographic Classification approved collection; Title of Panel Extramural Gene Function Research Review Board (MGCRB) Procedures and Information Collection: State Children’s Initiative (R21) UDP. Supporting Regulations; Use: The Health Insurance Program and Date: November 27, 2013. information submitted by the hospitals Supporting Regulations; Use: States Time: 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. is used to determine the validity of the must submit title XXI plans and Agenda: To review and evaluate grant hospitals’ requests and the discretion amendments for approval by the applications. Secretary. We use the plan and its Place: National Human Genome Research used by the Medicare Geographic Institute, 4076 Conference Room, 5635 Classification Review Board (MGCRB) subsequent amendments to determine if Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20852, in reviewing and making decisions the state has met the requirements of (Telephone Conference Call). regarding hospitals’ requests for title XXI. Information provided in the Contact Person: Keith McKenney, Ph.D., geographic reclassification. Form state plan, state plan amendments, and Scientific Review Officer, NHGRI, 5635 Number: CMS–R–138 (OCN: 0938– from the other information we are Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, Bethesda, MD 0573); Frequency: Yearly; Affected collecting will be used by advocacy 20814, 301–594–4280, mckenneyk@ Public: Business or other for-profits and groups, beneficiaries, applicants, other mail.nih.gov.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision Analysis Methodology to Evaluate Integrated Solid Waste Management Alternatives for a Remote Alaskan Air Station
    Air Force Institute of Technology AFIT Scholar Theses and Dissertations Student Graduate Works 3-2001 Decision Analysis Methodology to Evaluate Integrated Solid Waste Management Alternatives for a Remote Alaskan Air Station Mark J. Shoviak Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.afit.edu/etd Part of the Environmental Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Shoviak, Mark J., "Decision Analysis Methodology to Evaluate Integrated Solid Waste Management Alternatives for a Remote Alaskan Air Station" (2001). Theses and Dissertations. 4696. https://scholar.afit.edu/etd/4696 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Graduate Works at AFIT Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of AFIT Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DECISION ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY TO EVALUATE INTEGRATED SOLID WASTE MANAGMENT ALTERNATIVES FOR A REMOTE ALASKAN AIR STATION THESIS Mark J. Shoviak, Captain, USAF AFIT/GEE/ENV/01M-20 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR UNIVERSITY AIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED. The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or the U. S. Government. AFIT/GEE/ENV/01M-20 DECISION ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY TO EVALUATE INTEGRATED SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES FOR A REMOTE ALASKAN AIR STATION THESIS Presented to the Faculty Department of Systems and Engineering Management Graduate School of Engineering and Management Air Force Institute of Technology Air University Air Education and Training Command In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Engineering and Environmental Management Mark J.
    [Show full text]