DOCSLIB.ORG

Explanation of Factors Influencing Cyclists' Route Choice Using Actual

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Explanation of Factors Influencing Cyclists' Route Choice Using Actual Explanation of factors influencing cyclists’ route choice using actual route data from cyclists Doh Kyoum Shin Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds Institute for Transport Studies April, 2016 ii The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. © 2016 The University of Leeds and Doh Kyoum Shin The right of Doh Kyoum Shin to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. iii Acknowledgements There were many things happened during the PhD study and it was rather a hard time for me. However, I have enjoyed the study. I would like to sincerely and graciously thank my supervisors, Dr. Astrid Gühnemann and Dr. Ann Jopson. Without their help, I could not have completed the study. I feel that my English, though improving, is still not enough to enable me to express my thanks fully. I would like to thank my parents for their support and love. Unfortunately, my father did not live to see the outcome of my study. I also would like to thank all the participants who took part in the study, especially to those who provide route data collection and interview responses. Their help in these areas was critical to the success of the study, and was much appreciated by me. I also wish to say ‘thank you’ to Keith, Nurul Hidayati, Ian Philips and all the PhD students and staff of ITS. Keith especially provided much help for administrational matters during the study. Nurul Hidayati and Ian Philips especially provided valuable input and discussion during the study. I would also like to thank my senior colleagues Dr. Dong Pil Son, Dr. Young Jin Cho and Dr. Kwang Heum Yu for their advices. Finally, I really want to thank Minji Kim, Hyeran Ji and Su Yeon Ryu for providing me with lots of good cheer and support during the last four months. My thanks are extended to all of you. iv Abstract Cycling as a sustainable means of transport brings a number of benefits, which includes improved health and well-being for individuals, improved air quality and climate change, accessibility and reduced traffic congestion at the national level. However, despite the benefits of cycling and the efforts by the government to promote this mode of transport, many short trips in Britain suitable for cycling are still made by motorised transport modes. People seem reluctant to change their mode of travel behaviour in favour of cycling. Therefore, it is important to understand the nature of complicated behaviour of people and the ones of cyclists at first. The thesis aimed to understand route choice behaviour for cycling for utility purposes in England. The thesis examined why cyclists use their current routes and how various features influence their choices. The thesis also probed the reasons for the choices and the relationship between the choice and the characteristics of cyclists. A mixed method approach was applied for the thesis, using questionnaires, actual route data collection for quantitative methods and interviews for qualitative methods. This approach allowed the researcher to examine diverse aspects of the research questions, which individual methods were unlikely to address. The thesis has identified what route features are important for cyclists, and why these features are considered important. In terms of the issues regarding cycling infrastructures, the preferences of cyclists were found to be linked to the fear to motorised traffic on roads, which is a fundamental issue that may not be revealed through quantitative studies. Another key finding identified was that cyclists choose different routes dependent on the conditions applicable even for same trip purposes. In this respect, it was noted that often their choices are forced by prevailing road instructions such as one-way road, although they may be aware that the alternative road conditions may not be good from a cycling viewpoint. However, it was also found that, where practicable, cyclists are likely to choose a route strategically, in a manner that will minimise the physical efforts required for cycling. Finally, based on the observations of the different geographical and environmental characteristics and atmosphere to cycling in two case study cities, the thesis also discovered the segment of the population who could become the main target for promoting the benefits of cycling. v Table of Contents Acknowledgements .................................................................................... iii Abstract ....................................................................................................... iv Table of Contents ........................................................................................ v List of Tables .............................................................................................. xi List of Figures .......................................................................................... xiv Chapter 1 Introduction ................................................................................ 1 1.1 Introduction ..................................................................................... 1 1.2 Rationale of the Thesis .................................................................... 1 1.3 Research Aims and Objectives ....................................................... 4 1.4 Structure of the Thesis .................................................................... 6 Chapter 2 Literature Review ....................................................................... 7 2.1 Introduction ..................................................................................... 7 2.2 Factors Affecting Cycling Route Choices ........................................ 7 2.2.1 Classifying Factors Affecting Cycling Route Choice ............. 8 2.2.2 Route Choice Criteria: Distance, Time, Safety ................... 13 2.2.3 Physical Environment ......................................................... 15 2.2.4 Traffic Environment ............................................................ 19 2.2.5 Cyclist Characteristics ........................................................ 20 2.2.6 Natural Environment........................................................... 23 2.2.7 Trip Characteristics ............................................................ 24 2.2.8 Cyclist Concerns ................................................................ 25 2.2.9 Summary of Section 2.2 ..................................................... 27 2.3 Classifying Cyclists........................................................................ 28 2.4 Stated Preference and Revealed Preference ................................ 33 2.4.1 SP based Approaches........................................................ 33 2.4.2 RP based Approach: Use of GIS and GPS ........................ 36 2.5 Mixed Methods Approach .............................................................. 42 2.6 Chapter Summary ......................................................................... 47 Chapter 3 Methodology ............................................................................ 52 3.1 Introduction .................................................................................. 52 3.2 Mixed Methods Approach ............................................................. 52 3.3 Overall Design of the Thesis ......................................................... 56 vi 3.3.1 Methods used in the Thesis ............................................... 58 3.4 Study Areas and Samples ............................................................ 62 3.4.1 Study Areas ....................................................................... 62 3.4.2 Samples ............................................................................ 65 3.5 Phase 1 : Questionnaires ............................................................. 68 3.5.1 Variables measured ........................................................... 69 3.5.2 Structure of the Questionnaire .......................................... 71 3.5.3 Data Collection Procedure ................................................ 74 3.5.4 Statistical Analysis of Questionnaire Data ......................... 74 3.5.4.1 Factor Analysis ........................................................ 75 3.5.4.2 Cluster Analysis ...................................................... 76 3.5.4.3 The X2 (Chi-square) Test ........................................ 78 3.5.4.4 Mann-Whitney U Test.............................................. 79 3.5.4.5 Kruskal Wallis Test .................................................. 79 3.6 Phase 2: GPS Route Collection ................................................... 79 3.6.1 Equipment ......................................................................... 80 3.6.2 Data Collection Procedure ................................................ 81 3.6.3 Analysis of GPS Route Data ............................................. 83 3.7 Phase 3: Interviews ...................................................................... 87 3.7.1 Overview of Interviews ....................................................... 87 3.7.2 Topics questioned ............................................................. 88 3.7.2 Interview Procedure
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Travel Information: the Foundry, Cavendish Street, Leeds
    Student Travel Information Pack. 2018/19. 1 Travel Information: The Foundry, Cavendish Street, Leeds We can all see the effects of the way we travel on our environment, our health and our quality of life. Increases in road traffic have produced unsustainable levels of congestion and pollution. However, sustainable travel can reduce congestion, improve local environments and encourage healthier and safer lifestyles. All of The Foundry residents are encouraged to use sustainable modes of travel to and from the site. This document has been produced to inform students about local facilities and travel options available, and to encourage the use of sustainable travel to and from The Foundry by promoting walking, cycling, public transport and responsible car use. Walking Facilities All roads surrounding The Foundry have footways and are lit by street lighting with the majority of uncontrolled crossing points having dropped kerbs with tactile paving. Crossing facilities in the form of signal controlled - including pedestrian phases, advanced stop lines, guard rail and tactile paving, assist pedestrians at the nearby junctions. All these extensive facilities provide convenient pedestrian access to the surrounding areas including Leeds City Centre, off-site amenities and Leeds Beckett University Campus. A free online walking journey planner is available at http://walkit.com/cities/leeds/. UTravelActive promotes healthier, cheaper and cleaner everyday journeys for students at universities, colleges and hospitals in Leeds and helps students to switch everyday journeys to walking and cycling. www.utravelactive.org.uk. Travelling to University Both the University of Leeds and Leeds Beckett University have their own travel plans. These plans promote sustainable travel to the universities in order to reduce the number of vehicles in the vicinity of their campuses.
    [Show full text]
  • The Leeds Trolley Vehicle System Order Business Case Leeds NGT: Business Case Review January 2014
    Transport and TWAO Document Ref. C-1 Works Act 1992 The Leeds Trolley Vehicle System Order Business Case Leeds NGT: Business Case Review January 2014 Leeds NGT – Business Case Review Executive Summary The Leeds New Generation Transport (NGT) project will be a 14.8km trolleybus network with lines to: I Holt Park (North Line) I Stourton (South Line) The scheme includes Park & Ride sites on the North Line at Bodington and at the South Line terminus at Stourton. NGT will provide a high quality, highly segregated, rapid transit service with high capacity, greater punctuality and faster journey times than bus services. It will significantly improve the quality of public transport in Leeds and provide an attractive alternative to private car travel. NGT is being jointly promoted by the West Yorkshire Passenger Transport Executive (Metro) and Leeds City Council (LCC). It will open to passengers in early 2020. On award of Programme Entry to the NGT Project, DfT committed capital funding of £173.5 million towards the investment cost of the trolleybus solution as specified in the funding approval. The Promoters will contribute further to this. This document fulfils DfT’s requirements for a Business Case submission. It sets out NGT’s: I Strategic Case I Economic Case I Financial Case I Commercial Case I Management Case The Strategic Case sets out the scheme context and includes a description of the problems and issues which NGT will help to resolve. It sets out the scheme objectives and describes how the Preferred Option was developed. The Strategic Case demonstrates that NGT will make a strong contribution to meeting national, regional and local policy objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for West Yorkshire and York
    WEST YORKSHIRE AND YORK INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEETING TO BE HELD AT 2.00 PM ON TUESDAY, 11 JUNE 2019 IN COMMITTEE ROOM A, WELLINGTON HOUSE, 40-50 WELLINGTON STREET, LEEDS A G E N D A 1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE 2. DECLARATIONS OF DISCLOSABLE PECUNIARY INTERESTS 3.3. EXEMPT INFORMATION - POSSIBLE EXCLUSION OF THE PRESS AND PUBLIC 4. 1. To highlight Appendix 6 to Agenda Item 6 which officers have identified as containing exempt information within the meaning of Schedule 12A to the Local Government Act 1972, and where officers consider that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information, for the reasons outlined in the report. 2. To consider whether or not to accept the officers’ recommendation in respect of the above information as set out in paragraph 4.2 of Agenda Item 6. 3. If the recommendation is accepted, to formally pass the following resolution:- RESOLVED – That in accordance with paragraph 3 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A to the Local Government Act 1972, the public be excluded from the meeting during consideration of Appendix 6 to Agenda Item 6 on the grounds that it is likely, in view of the nature of the business to be transacted or the nature of the proceedings, that if members of the press and public were present there would be disclosure to them of exempt information and for the reasons set out in the report that in all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Director of City Development
    Agenda: Originator: Tim Parry Tel: 2476385 Report of the Director of City Development Executive Board Date: 14 October 2009 Subject: LEEDS CORE CYCLE NETWORK PROJECT Electoral Wards Af fected: Specific Implications For: All except Wetherby, Otley & Yeadon, Guiseley & Rawdon, Equality and Diversity Kippax & Methley Community Cohesion Narrowing the Gap ü Ward Members consulted (referred to in report) Eligible for Call In Not Eligible for Call In ü (Details contained in the report) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report provides an overview of proposals now being developed to implement a strategic approach to the longer term development of cycle facilities and routes within Leeds. The proposals build on a scheme submitted for Major Scheme funding to the Regional Transport Board early in 2009 which was not supported for funding. It is intended to take the project forward in phases. The Leeds Core Cycle Network which is the subject of this report will form the first phase of the project for development over the next few years as resources allow. Further work is in progress to identify extensions to this initial network capable of forming a Core Network 2 Project together with the intention to commence the early review of facilities provided within the City Centre. It is intended to progress the scheme from within the Local Transport Plan and the third Local Transport Plan from 2011 onwards, and to consider the scheme as a potential candidate for Major Scheme funding as opportunities arise. The first phase Leeds Core Cycle Network Project will provide a series of continuous safe and convenient cycle routes, primarily for commuting.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tour De France Legacy for Leeds
    Report author: Mark Allman Tel: (24) 78323 Joint Report of the Directors of City Development, Public Health and Children’s Services. Report to Executive Board Date: 25 th June 2014 Subject: Tour de France Legacy for Leeds – ‘Cycling Starts Here’ Are specific electoral Wards affected? Yes No If relevant, name(s) of Ward(s): Are there implications for equality and diversity and cohesion Yes No and integration? Is the decision eligible for Call-In? Yes No Does the report contain confidential or exempt information? Yes No If relevant, Access to Information Procedure Rule number: Appendix number: Summary of main issues 1. The “Grand Départ” of the Tour de France is nearly upon us. In July the focus of the whole cycling world will be on Leeds - with our city providing the backdrop to the world’s largest annual sporting event. This report however does not focus on cycling in Leeds on 5 th July 2014. Rather it focuses on how we can improve the experience of cycling in Leeds over the months and years that follow to create a city fit for cycling. 2. It is clear that the impact of the Tour de France on cycling in Leeds can already be seen throughout the district. The publicity associated with the Grand Départ has helped raise awareness of cycling and its associated benefits in the build up to the event over the past year particularly with regard to recreational cycling. However, it is also recognised that there is still progress to be made in delivering a sustainable increase in cycling as a commuter option.
    [Show full text]
  • Land at Sandgate Drive, Kippax Proposed Residential Development Travel Plan Persimmon Homes March 2016 (Revision 2)
    Land at Sandgate Drive, Kippax Proposed Residential Development Travel Plan Persimmon Homes March 2016 (Revision 2) QM Land at Sandgate Drive, Kippax– 12068 File reference O:\Land At Kippax\TEXT\REPORTS\Appeal\160323 ‐ Kippax TP (Rev 2).Doc Issue/revision Issue 1 Revision 1 Revision 2 Revision 3 Remarks FINAL Amended following Updated with latest Travelwise comments sustainable information Date 16th August 2013 25th November 2013 23rd March 2016 Prepared by S Phillips S Phillips S Phillips Signature Checked by R Murphy R Murphy R Murphy Signature Authorised by P Owen P Owen P Owen Signature Optima Highways and Transportation Consultancy Ltd Atlas House 31 King Street Leeds LS1 2HL Tel: 0113 245 1679 Fax: 0113 245 9042 www.optimahighways.com Registered address ‐ Leigh House 28‐32 St Paul’s Street Leeds LS1 2JT Company Registration Number: 07328946 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Existing Conditions 2 3 Objectives and Scope of the Plan 8 4 Roles and Responsibilities 10 5 Travel Plan Measures 12 6 Implementation / Communication 16 7 Monitoring and Review 20 Appendices Appendix A Masterplan Figures Figure 1 Site Location Plan – Strategic Figure 2 Site Location Plan – Local Figure 3 Not Used Figure 4 Not Used Figure 5 Pedestrian Accessibility Plan Figure 6 Cycle Accessibility Plan Figure 7 Bus Stop Accessibility Plan 12068 1 Introduction 1.1.1 This Travel Plan (TP) document has been prepared on behalf of Persimmon Homes Ltd. The TP should be read in conjunction with the Transport Assessment (TA) that has been produced to accompany the planning application for proposed residential development. 1.1.2 The proposed area for which Persimmon are seeking to gain planning permission for is located on to the north of Kippax, the attached Figures 1 and 2 show the Site Location in relation to the strategic and local highway networks respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Controversial Rugby Society Social Causes Chaos • Headingley Taps ‘Trashed’ •‘They Act Like They’Re Untouchable’
    Bringing you the best news on campus since 1897 14 November 2014 thegryphon.co.uk Controversial rugby society social causes chaos • Headingley Taps ‘trashed’ •‘They act like they’re untouchable’ Jasmine Andersson EXCLUSIVE Editor-In-Chief One staff member said: ’We’ve dealt Storm Jameson Halls with their behaviour before, and we’re one Members of Leeds University Union’s of the only places that will. They don’t Rugby Union society have taken part in a have any common courtesy. They con- controversial social that saw them cause stantly try to urinate in our pint glasses, havoc across the city. and leave us to clean it up. It’s beyond a An army gear-clad group of the so- joke. ciety’s members took part in an Otley ‘They act like they’re untouchable. Run on Wednesday night, which saw No other society behaves like that here. I them ‘cover’ the Headingley Taps in eggs, have not once heard them say thank you. smash a window of Storm Jameson halls, They don’t understand that we’re actually and excrete in front of Charles Morris res- doing them the favour.’ idences. The sportsmen then proceeded to set A manager of The Headingley Taps off several smoke bombs in Devonshire said: ‘They trashed the place. Halls, resulting in several fire alarms ring- ‘They were fine when they were get- ing around the site. Photo: Anna Lawson ting their drinks, but once they got what Devonshire’s warden, Darron Dix- they wanted, they turned. on-Hardy, said: pitalised. ‘They began jumping up and down ‘The incident that happened was dealt Charles Morris Halls refused to on furniture, and some tried to rip down with by the duty Sub-Warden and Night comment on the incident.
    [Show full text]
  • (Sbcs) and Their Relation to Bicycle Modal Share
    IP Online First, published on January 9, 2014 as 10.1136/injuryprev-2013-040964 Inj Prev: first published as 10.1136/injuryprev-2013-040964 on 9 January 2014. Downloaded from Systematic review An international review of the frequency of single-bicycle crashes (SBCs) and their relation to bicycle modal share Paul Schepers,1 Niels Agerholm,2 Emmanuelle Amoros,3 Rob Benington,4 Torkel Bjørnskau,5 Stijn Dhondt,6 Bas de Geus,6 Carmen Hagemeister,7 Becky P Y Loo,8 Anna Niska9 1Ministry of Infrastructure and ABSTRACT of serious injury, see e.g. figure 1 showing that non- the Environment, Delft, The Objectives To study cyclists’ share of transport modes fatal injuries incurred by Dutch cyclists are, regardless Netherlands 2Aalborg University, Aalborg, (modal share) and single-bicycle crashes (SBCs) in of injury severity, mostly due to crashes that do not Denmark different countries in order to investigate if the involve motor vehicles, the large majority being 3IFSTTAR, Université de Lyon, proportion of cyclist injuries resulting from SBCs is SBCs; (2) SBCs cause direct economic costs through Lyon, France 111 4 affected by variation in modal share. absence from work and from productivity losses; Public Health (Bristol), Bristol, Methods A literature search identified figures (largely (3) the hazards that lead to SBCs such as poor infra- UK 5TØI Institute of Transport from western countries) on SBC casualties who are structure quality may discourage more active travel Economics, Oslo, Norway fatally injured, hospitalised or treated at an emergency by bicycle, thereby preventing people from taking – 6Vrije Universiteit Brussel, department. Correlation and regression analyses were advantage of the health benefits of cycling;12 17 and Brussels, Belgium used to investigate how bicycle modal share is related to (4) there is a moral obligation to understand the risks 7Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany SBCs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foundry, Leeds
    Student Travel Information Pack. 2017/18. 1 Travel Information: The Foundry, Cavendish Street, Leeds We can all see the effects of the way we travel on our environment, our health and our quality of life. Increases in road traffic have produced unsustainable levels of congestion and pollution. However, sustainable travel can reduce congestion, improve local environments and encourage healthier and safer lifestyles. All of The Foundry residents are encouraged to use sustainable modes of travel to and from the site. This document has been produced to inform students about local facilities and travel options available, and to encourage the use of sustainable travel to and from The Foundry by promoting walking, cycling, public transport and responsible car use. Walking Facilities All roads surrounding The Foundry have footways and are lit by street lighting with the majority of uncontrolled crossing points having dropped kerbs with tactile paving. Crossing facilities in the form of signal controlled - including pedestrian phases, advanced stop lines, guard rail and tactile paving, assist pedestrians at the nearby junctions. All these extensive facilities provide convenient pedestrian access to the surrounding areas including Leeds City Centre, off-site amenities and Leeds Beckett University Campus. A free online walking journey planner is available at: http://walkit.com/cities/leeds/. UTravelActive promotes healthier, cheaper and cleaner everyday journeys for students at universities, colleges and hospitals in Leeds and helps students to switch everyday journeys to walking and cycling. www.utravelactive.org.uk. Travelling to University Both the University of Leeds and Leeds Beckett University have their own travel plans. These plans promote sustainable travel to the universities in order to reduce the number of vehicles in the vicinity of their campuses.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 11 15 Joanna Elvy Phd Thesis FINAL.Pdf
    Towards Socially Inclusive Sustainable Mobility: The Role of Social Capital in Participatory Transport Planning Processes Joanna Katherine Elvy Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds Institute for Transport Studies November 2019 1 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is her own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement The right of Joanna Katherine Elvy to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by her in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. 2 Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to thank my supervisors Frances Hodgson and Karen Lucas for their academic guidance and emotional support throughout my time at ITS. Secondly, I would like to thank the University of Leeds, White Rose Doctoral Training College and the Economic and Social Research Council for funding this research and providing additional training and support. Thirdly I would like to thank the following people and organisations who in their own way were all instrumental in enabling me to carry out this research including: Alissa Twinning, Alvaro Guzman, Chris Green, Fiona Crawford, Julian Burkinshaw, Leeds City Council, Leeds College of Building, Leicester City Council, Milton Keynes Bus User Group, Milton Keynes Centre for Integrated Living, Milton Keynes Council, Milton Keynes Disability Advisory Group, Monash University (particularly Graham Currie and Alexa Delbosc), Peter Atkinson, Royal Geographical Society, West Yorkshire Combined Authority, and all of the anonymous participants who agreed to be observed and interviewed in this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex to MS94: Compilation of Case Study Reports a Compendium of Case Study Reports from 40 Cities in 14 European Countries
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Garzillo, Cristina; Ulrich, Peter Working Paper Annex to MS94: Compilation of case study reports A compendium of case study reports from 40 cities in 14 European countries WWWforEurope Working Paper, No. 94 Provided in Cooperation with: WWWforEurope - WelfareWealthWork, Wien Suggested Citation: Garzillo, Cristina; Ulrich, Peter (2015) : Annex to MS94: Compilation of case study reports A compendium of case study reports from 40 cities in 14 European countries, WWWforEurope Working Paper, No. 94, WWWforEurope, Vienna This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/125749 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Annex to MS94: Compilation of case study reports A compendium of case study reports from 40 cities in 14 European countries Working Paper No.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Allocations Plan Adoption Version Appendices
    Site Allocations Plan Adoption Version Appendices Leeds Local Plan Development Plan Document June 2019 www.leeds.gov.uk/yourcity APPENDICES Appendix 1: Annex 1 – Identified housing (HG1) sites with planning permission/expired planning permission Annex 2 – Identified office (EO1) sites with planning permission / expired planning permission Annex 3 – Identified general employment (EG1) sites with planning permission / expired planning permission Appendix 2: Infrastructure Delivery Plan Appendix 3: Schedule of the Leeds UDP ‘Saved’ Policies including those to be superseded by the Site allocations plan Glossary 595 of 850 Appendix 1 ANNEX 1 – IDENTIFIED HOUSING (HG1) SITES WITH PLANNING PERMISSION/EXPIRED PLANNING PERMISSION AIREBOROUGH Plan Ref Address Capacity HG1-1 Bradford Road - High Royds, Menston 349 HG1-2 Netherfield Road - Cromptons, Guiseley 116 HG1-4 The Drop Inn 29 Town Street, Guiseley 6 HG1-5 Parkside Works Otley Road, Guiseley 7 HG1-6 Springfield Road - Springhead Mills, Guiseley 54 HG1-7 Former Dairy Crest Site, Queensway, Guiseley 14 HG1-8 107 Queensway Yeadon 9 HG1-9 Haworth Court, Chapel Lane 45 HG1-11 Station Garage, Henshaw Lane, Yeadon 5 Site of Units at Green Lane Dyeworks and Mill Ponds and25 and 27 Green HG1-12 171 Lane, Yeadon, Leeds HG1-13 26-28 New Road Side, Rawdon 5 HG1-14 Batter Lane, Rawdon 4 HG1- 96* Low Hall Road -Riverside Mill, Horsforth LS19 52 Total 837 *No further flood risk exception test would be needed for this site provided the development is carried out in accordance with the permission. If the scheme is altered or reapplication made, a further exception test will be required.
    [Show full text]