DOCSLIB.ORG

Engels, Manchester, and the Working Class / Steven Marcus

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Engels, Manchester, and the Working Class / Steven Marcus Originally published by Random House Published 2015 by Transaction Publishers Published 2017 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, USA Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business New material this edition copyright © 2015 by Taylor & Francis. Copyright © 1974, 1985 by Steven Marcus. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. Library of Congress Catalog Number: 2015000011 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Marcus, Steven, 1928- Engels, Manchester, and the working class / Steven Marcus. pages cm Revised edition of the author’s Engels, Manchester, and the working class 1986. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-4128-5669-0 1. Engels, Friedrich, 1820-1895. 2. Working class--England-- Manchester--History--19th century. 3. Great Britain--Economic conditions--1760-1860. I. Title. HD8389.E534 2015 305.5’620942--dc23 2015000011 ISBN 13: 978-1-4128-5669-0 (pbk) To Lionel Trilling Contents Acknowledgements ix Preface xi New Introduction xvii 1 Historical Prologue 1 2 The Town 21 3 Friedrich Engels from 1820 to 1845 53 4 The Condition of the Working Class (1) 105 5 The Condition of the Working Class (2) 161 6 In Place of a Conclusion 201 Bibliographical Note 207 About the Author 209 Index 211 Acknowledgements A part of this study, in different form, has appeared as a chapter in The Victorian City: Images and Realities (London, 1973), 2 vols., edited by H. J. Dyos and Michael Wolff. I want to thank both editors for their kindness and cooperation. H. J. Dyos in particular merits a special note of gratitude for tireless encouragement and cajolery. The last draft of this work was completed at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, at Stanford, California. The admin- istration and staff of that institution were most helpful. My thanks go especially to Miriam Gallaher. Devra Rosenberg has helped me with bibliography and proofs. A number of friends and colleagues read the manuscript at different stages and offered critical suggestions on a variety of topics. I want to express my thanks to Lillian Hellman, Eugene Genovese, F. W. Dupee and Lionel Trilling for their generosity in this connection. J. P. Bauke read through the manuscript critically with the question of translation in mind and helped me considerably with the rendering of certain passages. My wife, Gertrud Lenzer, made her stalwart energies and intelligence continually available to me, for which as she knows she has my unfailing gratitude. ix Preface The following study tries to consider a number of things together. First, there is a place: Manchester, the site and center of the first Industrial Revolution, a new kind of city in which the formation of a new kind of human world seemed to be occurring. Second, a relatively brief moment in time, roughly the fifteen years from 1835 to 1850, during which Britain—and Manchester—underwent the first grand crisis of the newly emerging system of social existence, the system known to us historically as industrialism or industrial capitalism. Third, there is a young man, Friedrich Engels, whose fortunes in life had brought him to this place at this time. Engels was in his early twenties when he first arrived in Manchester; he was the son of a prosperous German textile mill-owner, and the purpose of his protracted visit—it lasted twenty months—was to complete his business training in the Manchester cotton mills and offices owned in partnership by his father. In addi- tion, this young foreign businessman was an intellectual (although the term did not yet exist), and a self-taught one to boot; he had not been a university student and had not even completed the course of study in the Gymnasium of his native Rhineland town. Such disadvantages, however, did not deter him from holding definite views on a far-flung variety of recondite subjects; and he had already begun to publish essays, articles and journalistic pieces in certain organs of the liberal, democratic, radical and left-wing German-language movements. The combination of these three elements resulted some two and a half years later in a book, The Condition of the Working Class in England in 1844. This effort, Engels’ first major publication in a distinguished career that was to continue without interruption for the next half- century, is also the best and most original work that he ever wrote, and the final purpose of the study that follows is its critical examination. The purpose and terms of the study having been framed, it may be fitting at the outset to direct attention to a number of difficulties. In particular there are the obvious dangers attaching to the fact that the xi Engels, Manchester, and the Working Class following essay trespasses on certain specialist disciplines and fields of study in which I can claim no professional competence. It touches unavoidably upon such matters as the history of socialism, of Marxist thought and Marxism, and of social theory in general. It fishes perforce in the troubled, not to say polluted, waters of the history and theory of the Industrial Revolution. In the nature of the case, it is compelled to deal with questions that involve the lively interests of urban studies and urban sociology. Finally, it deals with certain problems of nineteenth- century English literature and cultural life and history. It is only in the last of these that I feel qualified to fix critical judgments and render them in their (necessarily) argumentative form. I think it therefore useful to admit at once that this study almost certainly offends on a number of counts, and that historians, social scientists and others will find errors, innocences and crudities of thought that are probably, in the nature of the undertaking, inevitable, apart from whatever mistakes and awkwardnesses might have been avoided. To this it must be added that I was able to find no acceptable alternative in which the first class of error might be automatically eliminated. At the same time, it would be less than candid of me to deny that the taking up of such difficulties was not, in part, the result of deliber- ate intention. In this sense the present work may be regarded as part of a continuing experiment; some of its purposes may be described as follows: to ascertain how far literary criticism can help us understand history and society; to see how far the intellectual discipline that begins with the work of close textual analysis can help us understand certain social, historical or theoretical documents. In a previous study (The Other Victorians) most of the material I dealt with analytically could be appraised as “bad text,” in the sense that its complexities and contradictions were largely unconscious and revealed themselves in the prose as unintended ambiguities, lapses, non sequiturs and other less than logical formations. In the present study I have taken a “good text,” most of whose complexity is a result of conscious intention, and whose ambiguities, paradoxes and contradictions attach as much to its object as to itself. If this work succeeds in some measure, it may, perhaps, have some salutary effect on literary criticism or study in its present uneasy state as well. If literary criticism is not to decline further than it already has into aesthetic or political fashionability on the one side and academic stupor on the other, it must—in my judgment—now that its heroic modern period is past, begin to draw with increasing deliberation xii Preface upon the other cognitive disciplines. For literature and literary criti- cism are very little if they cannot sustain the claim to cognitive status. Either we take literature seriously in this sense or we don’t. If we don’t, then we can study and discuss it in a formal or formalistic way—as the arranging of patterns and designs, as a superior form of organized amusement, as a series of language games (all of which have their due place in a full account of the process). If we do, however, then we have to regard literature in ways that are comparable to the ways we regard any of the essential and fundamental human activities, such as language, sexuality or economics, although literature itself may not be ultimately irreducible as these three seem to be. And by the same token we have to regard the study of literature with the same seriousness that we regard the disciplines of study appropriate to those other activities. This, of course, is no place to argue theoretically the case for literature and the study of literature as modes of knowledge. This much may be said, however, in brief and in passing. According to Max Weber’s way of thinking, that which is distinctively and constitutively significant about human activity is that it produces meaning.1 Literary criticism, the study of literature, is nothing if it is not the study of meaning and meanings as they appear essentially in the forms of literature. It is, in addition, and by means of its own activity, the creation of further meaning. In these attributes literature and literary criticism are no different from other essential human activities and the branches of study that have grown up around them—both the activity and the discourse appropriate to it are cognitive and produce meaning.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Dickens Fellowship at Komazawa Univ., 8 June, 2002, Ueki
    The Dickens Fellowship at Komazawa Univ., 8 June, 2002, Ueki Steven Marcus (b. 1928), George Delacorte Professor in the Humanities, Columbia University * The Life and Work of Sigmund Freud, / Earnest Jones, edited and abridged by Lionel Trilling & Steven Marcus. Basic Books, 1961 * Dickens: From Pickwick to Dombey, Chatto & Windus, 1965 * The Other Victorians: A Study of Sexuality and Pornography in Mid-nineteenth Century England, Basic Books, 1966 * "Reading the Illegible", in The Victorian City, 1973 * Engels, Manchester, and the Working Class, Random House, 1974 * Representations: Essays on Literature and Society, Random House, 1975 * Art, Politics, and Will: Essays in Honor of Lionel Trilling, edited by Quintin Anderson, Stephen Donadio, Steven Marcus, Basic Books, 1977 . the committee salutes Marcus' "lifelong commitment to the college, a place where he has worn many hats, including student, administrator and teacher." http://www.columbia.edu/cu/record/archives/vol22/vol22_iss19/record2219.16.html p. 2. Dickens: From Pickwick to Dombey 1. The means Dickens employs, in Pickwick Papers, to achieve the idealization of the relation of father and son is not unfamiliar to us in the literature of a later age: he provides Sam with two fathers, a plenitude in which, like Kipling's Kim but unlike Joyce's Stephen Dedalus, Sam luxuriates. On the one hand there is the actual father, Tony, with whom Sam is altogether intimate and direct, for over him Tony holds only the authority of affection: when he and Sam initially meet in the novel, it is the first time in more than two years that they have seen each other.
    [Show full text]
  • The Moral Imagination: from Edmund Burke to Lionel Trilling'
    H-Albion Weaver on Himmelfarb, 'The Moral Imagination: From Edmund Burke to Lionel Trilling' Review published on Sunday, July 1, 2007 Gertrude Himmelfarb. The Moral Imagination: From Edmund Burke to Lionel Trilling. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee Publisher, 2006. xv + 259 pp. $26.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-1-56663-624-7; $16.95 (paper), ISBN 978-1-56663-722-0. Reviewed by Stewart Weaver (Department of History, University of Rochester)Published on H- Albion (July, 2007) Divided Natures In this latest of her several collections of occasional essays, Gertrude Himmelfarb offers subtle appreciations of some notable thinkers and writers who besides being "eminently praiseworthy" in themselves have, she says, enriched her life and been especially important to her own political and philosophical development (p. ix). Though with one exception all of the essays have appeared in print before--some of them more than once, oddly--together they have original interest both for their close juxtaposition and for what they reveal about the evolving interests and attitudes of a prominent American Victorianist. The oldest essay, an "untimely appreciation" of the popular novelist John Buchan, dates to 1960; the most recent, a centenary tribute to Lionel Trilling, dates to 2005. The rest range in origin widely across the intervening forty-five years and they encompass a wide variety of subjects. Not surprisingly, given what we know of Himmelfarb's own post-Trotskyite disposition, many of her characters (Edmund Burke, Benjamin Disraeli, Michael Oakeshott, Winston Churchill) are recognizably conservative. But conservatism is a loose category, especially in the British context, and Himmelfarb is not unduly bound by it.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 the Traffic in Obscenity
    Notes Chapter 1 The traffic in obscenity 1 John Ashcroft, Remarks, Federal Prosecutors’ Symposium on Obscenity, National Advocacy Center, Columbia, SC (6 June 2002); Report from the Joint Select Committee on Lotteries and Indecent Advertisements (London: Vacher & Sons, 1908). 2 Steven Marcus, The Other Victorians: A Study of Sexuality and Pornography in Mid-Nineteenth-Century England (New York: Basic, 1964). 3 The earliest legal term for this print crime in Britain was obscenity, and I therefore prefer it to more recent terminology. 4 Michel Foucault, The Archaeology of Knowledge, 1969, trans. A. M. Sheridan Smith (London: Routledge, 2001). 5 Society for the Suppression of Vice (London: S. Gosnell, 1825), 29. 6 Robert Darnton, The Forbidden Best-Sellers of Pre-Revolutionary France (New York: Norton, 1995); Jay David Bolter and Richard Grusin, Remediation: Understanding New Media (Cambridge: MIT, 1999); Lisa Gitelman and Geoffrey B. Pingree eds, New Media, 1740–1914 (Cambridge, MA: MIT 2003); and David Thorburn and Henry Jenkins, eds, Rethinking Media Change: The Aesthetics of Transition (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003). 7 Anthony Giddens, Runaway World: How Globalization is Reshaping Our Lives (New York: Routledge, 2002), 1. 8 Jean Baudrillard, The Ecstasy of Communication, ed. Sylvère Lotringer, trans. Bernard and Caroline Schutze (Paris: Editions Galilée, 1988), 22, 24. 9 Laurence O’Toole, Pornocopia: Porn, Sex, Technology and Desire (London: Serpent’s Tale, 1999), 51. 10 Baudrillard, The Ecstasy, 24. 11 Edward Said, Orientalism (New York: Vintage, 1979), 87. 12 Saree Makdisi, Romantic Imperialism: Universal Empire and the Culture of Modernity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 128. 13 Thomas Pakenham, The Scramble for Africa, 1876–1912, 1991 (London: Abacus, 2001), 140, 122.
    [Show full text]
  • Erotic Bonds Among Women in Victorian Literature
    571 11 DEBORAH LUTZ Erotic Bonds Among Women in Victorian Literature Anne Lister, an early- nineteenth- century lesbian, wrote in her diary about using Byron’s poetry to seduce – or fl irt with – pretty women. 1 She planned to give the fi fth canto of “Childe Harold’s Pilgrimage” (1812) to one young woman, who, when Lister asked her if she liked Byron’s poetry, responded “yes, perhaps too well”; when the girl haunted Lister’s “thoughts like some genius of fairy lore,” she pondered sending her a Cornelian heart with a copy of Byron’s lines on the subject. 2 Women she knew blushed when they “admitted” to having read Don Juan (1819– 1824) and spoke of being “almost afraid” to read Cain (1821). 3 To one of her lovers, Lister read aloud Glenarvon (1816), Lady Caroline Lamb’s melodramatic, fi ctional- ized version of her affair with Byron; they found it a “very dangerous sort of book.” 4 The novel’s heroine cross- dresses, a practice women in Lister’s social circle sometimes used to woo straight women. 5 Lister even played with performing Byronism in her romantic dalliances. 6 Like a bold Byronic hero, she gazed on attractive women with a “penetrating countenance,” and looked “unutterable things” at them, which led them to confess to wishing she “had been a gent.” 7 She tried to “mould” young women “to her purpose,” treating them like toys. 8 But it wasn’t only Byron who pro- vided Lister with ways to act on her own sexual identity. Like many in the nineteenth century who had little access to information about “deviant” types of sexuality, she read classical texts for their descriptions of same- sex desire, especially Juvenal’s Sixth Satire , with its famous lesbian orgy.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Europe, 1789-1918 the Age of Revolution and Counterrevolution
    SWARTHMORE COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY HISTORY 3A: MODERN EUROPE, 1789-1918 THE AGE OF REVOLUTION AND COUNTERREVOLUTION Spring 2007 Bob Weinberg Office Hours: Monday: 1-3 Trotter 218 Wednesday: 1--3 8133 Thursday: 1--2 rweinbe1 By Appointment This course introduces you to the impact of French Revolution on European politics, society, and culture from the late eighteenth to the early twentieth century. Topics include the revolutionary tradition; industrialization and its social consequences; the emergence of liberalism, feminism, socialism, and conservatism as social and political movements; nationalism and state building; imperialism, the rise of mass society; and world war. I make no attempt to narrate the entire history of the period. Instead, I will focus on a variety of themes and problems in order to illustrate certain key features of European history since 1789. I plan to mix lectures and discussions. It is therefore imperative that you keep up with the assigned readings so you can participate actively in the class All articles and documents are available through Blackboard. In addition, the following books are on reserve in McCabe and available for purchase: Gay Gullickson, Unruly Women of Paris: Images of the Commune Adam Hochschild, King Leopold’s Ghost Lynn Hunt, Politics, Culture, and Class in the French Revolution Jean-Yves Le Naour, The Living Unknown Soldier: A Story of Grief and the Great War Joan Neuberger and Robin Winks, Europe and the Making of Modernity, 1815-1914 Helmut Walser Smith, The Butcher’s Tale Evgenii Zamiatin, We Course Requirements: Attendance and participation in class discussions Three five-page papers Final Examination Seven-page research paper (Proposal and outline due April 29; Final paper due May 17) Short Papers Due: February 12 March 5 April 2 April 16 Please note that you need to write only three of these papers.
    [Show full text]
  • We Other Victorians Syllabus
    We Other Victorians? Historicism, Presentism, and the Endless Nineteenth Century English 556 Spring 2016 Mon. 3-6 PM, Fisher-Bennett 20 Emily Steinlight [email protected] Fisher-Bennett 116, ext. 8-5143 Office hours: Thurs. 10-12 or by appointment Course Description A strange fact worth acknowledging: to the Victorians we owe our field. Before them, no modern literary studies in English. Indeed, nineteenth-century writers were the first to speak of “literature” in its current sense. The disciplinary divisions they drew remain present in the structure of academic institutions and in the scholarly work we do; so too does their ideal of professionalism and the peculiar morality they attached to vocation. Not least among our debts to the nineteenth century, for better or for worse, is a certain fidelity to historicism and to the notion of literary periods. The field, in its organization and its favored methods, attests to that commitment. To what extent, then, can we historicize historicism? Can we do so while recognizing that we still dwell—conceptually, materially, and geopolitically—in a world historically forged by the nineteenth century? How might our situatedness in the present, and in the particular context of the early twenty-first century U.S., enter critically rather than inadvertently into the way we read Victorian literature and history now? What conflicting historicisms confront each other in literary studies today, and what alternatives to historicism seem desirable or practicable? This graduate seminar will provide an introduction to Victorian studies while attending to methodological debates about periodicity, the place of the present, and related concerns in and beyond the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning from Manchester: Uneven Development, Class and the City1
    praktyka 237 teoretycna 3(9)/2013 Kacper pobłocKi Learning from Manchester: Uneven 1 {Development, Class and the City This paper argues that one of the greatest challenges mount- ed to urban theory is accounting for the simultaneous un- folding in the Global South of “planetary urbanization” and world’s greatest industrial revolution. In order to show that industrial cities are still pertinent to urban theory, I revisit Victorian Manchester and Fredrick Engels’ classic account of it. I argue that Engels was a pioneer of what I dub “anthropology of the impersonal” and his “discovery” of class became the cornerstone for Marxist thought. Yet, his in- 1 An earlier version of this paper was presented at a weekly seminar held at The Center for Place, Culture and Politics at the Graduate Center of the City Uni- versity of New York when I was a visiting fellow there back in 2009. I am deeply grateful to Neil Smith for the invitation, and David Harvey and Peter Hitchcock, Center’s directors, as well as other fellows (especially Charity Schribner, Mehmet Kuymulu, Amy Chazkel, Karen Miller, Lilly Siant and Sujatha Fernandes) for their comments and encouragement. I would also like to thank Gáspár Miklós Tamás, whose “Class on Class” I took back in 2005 at the Central European University. It left an indelible mark on my thinking and convinced me that the “retreat from class” was both futile and temporary. Most ideas in this essay, however, are deeply indebted to Neil’s work and spirit, and I am deeply saddened that he will not see it getting published.
    [Show full text]
  • RISK and UTOPIA a Dialogue on Pornography
    RISK AND UTOPIA A Dialogue on Pornography Paul Morris and Susanna Paasonen In his 1977 essay “Entertainment and Utopia,” the film scholar Richard Dyer maps the utopian sensibilities of entertainment. For Dyer, the point of entertain- ment is to present “what utopia would feel like” and to provide solutions to social tensions, inadequacies, and absences experienced in everyday life.1 The utopian promise of entertainment is of “something better” that viewers can escape to and that moves and touches them on the plane of the affective. The utopian promise of porn is one of carnal intensity, sexual plenitude, and pleasure. The literary scholar Steven Marcus describes these utopian aspects of the genre — the abundant depic- tion of sexual acts and flowing desires — with the notion of “pornotopia.”2 Originating from an interest in pornography — in how it works and matters — this essay probes its particularities and utopian promises. Structured as a dia- logue between Paul Morris, a gay bareback porn producer, director, and founder of Treasure Island Media (TIM, est. 1998), with a background in studies of music, and Susanna Paasonen, a media studies scholar who has spent the last decade researching online pornography, this essay combines practice- based insights with theoretical reflection. By doing so, it addresses the force and appeal of pornogra- phy in general and its importance in and for gay bareback subculture in particular. Risky Sex Susanna Paasonen: Gay bareback pornography (that features penetrative sex without the use of condoms)
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Dissertation 081202 V3
    Copyright by Moira M. Di Mauro-Jackson, B.A.; M.A. 2008 The Dissertation Committee for Moira M. Di Mauro-Jackson certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Decadence as a Social Critique in Huysmans, D'Annunzio, and Wilde Committee: Katherine Arens, Co-Supervisor Daniela Bini, Co-Supervisor Elizabeth Richmond-Garza Janet Swaffar Antonio Gragera Decadence as a Social Critique in Huysmans, D'Annunzio, and Wilde by Moira M. Di Mauro-Jackson, B.A.; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin December 2008 To Larry and Logan Acknowledgements I want to thank my committee supervisors Daniela Bini and Katie Arens for their patience in evaluating and re-evaluating, editing, advising and supporting my work during all the years that this project took to complete. I am grateful for their support and patient coaching. My thanks also to all the other members of my dissertation committee: Antonio Gragera, Elizabeth Richmond-Garza and Janet Swaffar. All of you have been at once time mentors, friends and colleagues and a true example for me to follow. In particular, thanks to Antonio Gragera who endured the first edit of all my chapters and graciously guided me through all the toils and pangs of writing. My gratitude to Dolora Chapelle Wojciehowski and Elizabeth Richmond-Garza who encouraged me to come back and finish my dissertation, long postponed, and to the faculty at Texas State University who never lost faith in me, and whose emotional support have made this project possible: Ann Marie Ellis, dean of Liberal Arts, Robert Fischer, chairman of the department of Modern Languages, Blake Locklin, Carole Martin, and Michael Farris.
    [Show full text]
  • FRIEDRICH ENGELS Also by Terrell Carver
    FRIEDRICH ENGELS Also by Terrell Carver A MARX DICTIONARY ENGELS KARL MARX: Texts on Method MARX AND ENGELS: The Intellectual Relationship MARX'S SOCIAL THEORY Friedrich Engels His Life and Thought Terrell Carver Lecturer in Politics University ofBristol Palgrave Macmillan ISBN 978-0-333-56530-8 ISBN 978-1-349-20403-8 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-20403-8 © Terrell Foster Carver 1990 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1990 978-0-333-36017-0 All rights reserved. For information, write: Scholarly and Reference Division, SL Martin's Press, Inc., 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10010 Fu:st published in the United States of America in 1990 ISBN 978-0-312-04501-2 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Carver, Terrell. Friedrich Engels: his life and thought/ferrell Carver. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-0-312-04501-2 I. Engels, Friedrich, 1820-1895. 2. Dialectical materialism. I. Title. B3224.E6C37 1990 335.4'092--dc20 [B] 89-77153 CIP For my friends in America Contents List of Plates ix List of Abbreviations xi Map: Germany about 1848 xiv Introduction: Which Engels? XV 1 Intellectual Awakening 1 I Early Years 1 II Away from Home 12 III Radicalism 19 IV Scepticism 24 v Rationalism 28 2 Beginning of a Career 31 I Factory Towns 32 II 'Oswald' 39 III Young Hegelians 43 IV Liberalism and Nationalism 47 v Theory and Practice 53 3 Autodidact in Philosophy 60 I Correspondent in Berlin 62 II Pamphleteer 69 III Bombardier 80 IV Rhenish Radicals 81 v 'The Free' 86 vii viii Contents 4 Manchester Man 95 I Meeting
    [Show full text]
  • Fictions of Crime and the Experience of Modernity. Jon Francis Thompson Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1989 Modernism's Illegitimate Progeny: Fictions of Crime and the Experience of Modernity. Jon Francis Thompson Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Thompson, Jon Francis, "Modernism's Illegitimate Progeny: Fictions of Crime and the Experience of Modernity." (1989). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 4883. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/4883 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Pornography, Society, and the Law in Imperial Germany
    Grand Valley State University ScholarWorks@GVSU Peer Reviewed Articles History Department 2014 Pornography, Society, and the Law in Imperial Germany Gary D. Stark University of Texas at Arlington Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/hst_articles Part of the History Commons ScholarWorks Citation Stark, Gary D., "Pornography, Society, and the Law in Imperial Germany" (2014). Peer Reviewed Articles. 21. https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/hst_articles/21 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History Department at ScholarWorks@GVSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Peer Reviewed Articles by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@GVSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. and the Law Pornography, Society, In Imperial Germany GARY D. STARK recent years, the popular literature of the masses (so-called Tri- vialliteratur) has received increasing attention from literary and cul? IN tural historians, as has the response ofthe social elite to this form of popular culture.1 Yet few scholars have seriously investigated the his? tory of what must surely be one ofthe most pervasive genres of mass literature: pornography. This is unfortunate since (as Steven Marcus has shown in his pioneering study of sexuality in Victorian England) the view of human sexuality that surfaces in a society's pornographic sub- culture is often a reflection, however distorted or reversed, of officially I wish to thank the University of Texas at Arlington Organized Research Fund, which made possible the research for this project, and Konrad Jarausch and Leslie Page Moch, who offered helpful suggestions and criticisms. A preliminary draft of this paper was presented at the Western Association for German Studies Conference, 1979.
    [Show full text]