LAKE MINCHUMINA PREHISTORY an Archeologicalanalysis Charlese

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

LAKE MINCHUMINA PREHISTORY an Archeologicalanalysis Charlese LAKE MINCHUMINA PREHISTORY An ArcheologicalAnalysis CharlesE. Holmes ,.,i"|iiifti ',,,, .' ti!.'Ji.:.' :.rl!. ALAS E 78 I A3 H623 1986 Crz AlaskaAnthropological Associafron Monograph Senes rrent drop in core (Figure forest during Ier this to be on of vegeta. Toklat River 3. ETHNOHISTORICBACKGROUND rop in spruce rer 1.5 meters At the time of historic contact in the late 1800s,the Lake Minchumina ine cl:aysedi- ion was inhabitedby Koyukon speakingAthapaskan Indians. Hosley(l96gb:g, sse clays may l98l:618) has suggestedon ethnographicevidence that the Athapaskan group llen from the known as the Kolchan extendedtheir territory northeastwardto include Lake Minchuminaand the upper Kantishnaarea in late prehistoric/earlyhistoric times. He concludedthat this region had been inhabited earlier by Koyukon from the ,lowerTanana River. However,linguistic studiesindicate there was a spreadof Upper Koyukon dialectsinto the Minchuminaarea during the nineteenthcentury (Kraussand Golla l98l:74). Koyukon is viewed by Kraussand Golla as intrusive betweenlower Tananaand upper Kuskokwim(Kolchan) languages. Lower Tanana and Kolchan are partly intelligibleand are consideredto have been(at an earlier time)part of a dialectchain (Kraussand Golla l98l:74). 'Perhaps the earliest documented reference to Lake Minchumina and its local inhabitants is that of the Russian Zagoskin. In 1843 Zagoskin traveled up the Yukon River to a point just downstream from the mouth of the Nowitna (Noggoy- ya) River. He sought information concerning the unexplored remote interior from local Nowitna Natives and Koyukon traders who visited the territory up the yukon River beyond the Nowitna. Although the information is not entirely accurate (apparently communication was difficult), the large lake described was likely Lake Minchumina. The Noggoyya [Nowitna] River flows out of a large lake which connects with many others, and flows into the yukon from the left side, that is, from the south; it is up to 50 sazhens [about 105 m] in width, and the point where it leaves the lake is a day's journey, which means about 30 miles. There are a great many native winter houses at the river's exit from the lake; indeed, a good many people live along the banks of the lake itself, which is well supplied with fish. There are no high mountains on the side where these natives live, but there are bare, pointed mountain peaks stretching beyond the horizon on the right side of the river fZagoskin 1967:174, 175). In the following year, zagoskin made a summer trip up the Kuskokwim River as far as the mouth of the Takotna River in the vicinity of the present village of McGrath. He learned from the local Natives of a large lake at the headwaters of the Kuskokwim, and believed this lake to be the same as the one mentioned the previous year by Natives on the yukon. ...I should make the observation that a large lake or inland sea must exist between the parallels of 630 and 65o N and meridians l54o and l45o W. The testimony of the natives we saw on the Yukon and along the Innoka [Innoko], and of those who lived on the Tochotno [Takotna], upholds this supposition IZagoskin 1967:27 2J. l5 Lake Minchumina is by far the largest lake that lies within the coordinates the _meansof communi given by Zagoskin. That so many different Native groupsfrom diverse geograph- upper Kuskokwim (AlL ical areas were aware of Lake Minchumina is an indication of the mJUitlty'of (own the Yukon River thesepeople and their contactswith, and knowledgeof, other groups. According portagebetween the Tal to VanStoneand (1981:560) Goddard the Koyukon peoplethat Zagoskinmet at the at the American Churc Nowilna River may have been among the Koyukon that later moved up the him about the portage. KantishnaRiver. The mid'nineteenthcentury must have beena time of populationadjustments TheseIndian in the Lake Minchuminaregion and on the lower Tananaand Kantishna Rivers. be found by There seemsto have been almost continuousmovements of people into and a day's trav( throughoutthe study area. Given the linguistic evidenceand Native traditions streamsand (Hosley 1968b:9;schneider 1983) it is clear that both Kolchan and Koyuk,on the Kuskokw speakersconstituted fairly recent incursionsinto the Minchumina region. But how are we to know whether or not this pattern of populationmouement, dis- This reference is probr placement,and settlementwas happeningin prehistorictimes? I believethat the McNalley 1922:8-9)rat archeologicaldata presentedin this study supportsthe premisethat it was. would be approximate It is a foregoneconclusion that Athapaskanswere engagedin intergroup mention of a portage trade and visitationlong before the comingof Europeans,but very little is known However,he makesno : of these early intergroup contacts(cf. whymper t868; A. clark t974). That these networks were long standing is clear from the presenceof raw materials The Lower (suchas obsidianfrom the middle Koyukuk River drainageand copperfrom the ascendsthe upperCopper River drainage)found in archeologicalsites throughout the interior. crossesto th During the early nineteenthcentury, Russian traders extended their fur trad- this trail wr ing activitiesup the Kuskokwim River. A permanentstation was establishedthere Alaska; but in 1834,later (1841)named Kolmokovskiy Redoubt (Zagoskin 1967.252). By 1844 region is one Russianswere conducting trading venturesto the upper Kuskokwim drainage. Vinasale,a Kolchan fishing camp, becamean intermittent trading post (perhaps Unsubstantiatedr seasonal)from the 1840son into the twentieth century (Hosley l98l:620). It is and Kuskokwim River highly likely that Nativesfrom Telida and Minchuminawere trading at Vinasale. Beachmade a journey However,the Russiantrade on the Kuskokwim at the time of Zagoskin'stravels, 1884. Other reports was alreadybeing affected by Tanainaacting as middlemanbetween the Russians poling up the Kantis at Cook Inlet and the deep interior upper Kuskokwim Indians (Zagoskin shown the portage by 1967:168-169).According to Fall (1981:207),"These Tanaina crossed the mountains Kuskokwim River (Hel to meet the interior peopleat a placecalled 'Itstsyno'(modern day Medfra), near The first docume the mouth of the 'TogtygchagnaRiver', a tributary of the Kuskokwim." The home ground was the Tyonek Tanaina had a tradition of trading with other groupsfrom the interior. Army (Herron 1909). They would also meet upper Kuskokwim Nativesat Merrill Passin the summeror kwim River down-stre fall to conduct trading (Fall l98l). Intergroup encounterswere not always for the Tanana).. Aft friendly. This was illustrated,in the oral accountof Diqelas Tukda, a Tanaina monthswith the Kolcl who was faccd with bodily harm by upper Kuskokwim Natives,when it was dis- of NovembgrHerron's coveredthat he was exploitingthem by chargingexorbitant prices for goods(Pete Native trail to Lake Ir 1977:25).Trade from anotherdirection became possible in the late 1840swith the Cosjacket. Herron ( establishmentof the Hudson'sBay Companyon the upper Yukon River at Fort fifteen at Lake Min Yukon. It is quite likely that at least someBritish trade goodsmade their way Schneider(1983) has c to both the Kolchan and Minchumina Koyukon. In 1883Frederick Schwatkamade a reconnaissancedown the Yukon River. Considering His is possiblythe earliestmention of the KantishnaRiver and its inhabitants. In the heartlar describingthe Koyukon of the lower TananaRiver, he reportedthat they "...unite the upper for war only with thoseliving on the 'Koskoquien' and a band called the Upper 'Too-clok' [Kuskokwim] the [Toclat] who live on a river of the sarne name..."(Schwatka gleaned fr, 1885:95). conclusions Henry Allen's 1885exploration of the Tanana River provided the first de- and travel tailed accountof this important river. At the mouth of the Kantishna River he Herron recc obtainedinformation from Native informantsthat the KantishnaRiver was "partly l6 le coordinates means of communication between the )rsegeograph- natives of the lower Tanana and the lstT:85). warburtonpike, who e mobility : f:t5:T:--fl]l.l- madea canoejourney of rn the Yukon River in 1887,provides another reference )s. According to a Native trail and Talal1.ald Kuskokwim Rivers. pike met rndians ^;;;^,"1d rin met at the ::9"^b:,::^"_1tle, rcovrr""i t the American church Mission near the present day Tanan" ,lii;;;, ooved up the im aboutthe portage. n adjustments TheseIndians told us of an easyway to the coastthat might tishna Rivers. be found by poling for two days up the Tanana,and making ple into and a day's travel with many small portagesup and down littlJ ive traditions streamsand through severallakes, till a creek tributarv to lnd Koyuk,on the Kuskokwim is reached[pike 1967:23g1. region. But rovement, dis- This referenceis probably to the cosna River trail (cf. Herron lieve l90l:Map; Rand- that the McNalley 1922:8-9)rather than to the Kantishna River, since was. "two day;s travel,, would be approximately50 kilometers. Alfred Brooks made the first specific in intergroup portage mention of a trail betweenthe Kantishna and the Kuskokwim i.ivers. ittle.is known However,he makesno referenceto Lake Minchumina. 1974), That raw materials The Lower Tanana Indians are said to have a route which rper from the ascendsthe Toclat [Kantishna]and thence by portage trail the interior. crossesto the waters of the Kuskokwim.It is rumored that heir fur trad- ' this trail was used some by traders in the early historv of ablishedthere '.52). Alaska; but this rumor has never been verifiid, and the By 1844 regionis one which is entirelyunexprored
Recommended publications
  • Kisaralik River
    KISARALIK RIVER A WILD AND SCENIC RIVER ANALYSIS by the · . neritage Conservation & Recreation Service October 1979 Anchor an '. - .. ·.. :~ .• . ~~ ., ·. ARLIS .· .· Alaska Resources Uotary & Information Services AlM INTRODUCTION At the request of the Bureau of Land Management, the Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service made an independent study of the resources of the Kisaralik River area to determine the river's suitability for designation as a component of the National Wild and Scenic River System. In the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (PL. 90-542) Congress stated: "It is hereby declareq to be the policy of the United States that certain selected rivers of the Nation which with their immediate envi:r:onments, possess outstandingly remarkable scenic, recreational, geologic, fish and wildlife, historic, cultural, or other similar values, shall be preserved in free-flowing condition, and that they and their immediate environments shall be protected for the benefit and enjoyment of present and future generations." Ibis study was made in compliance with ~he Act. An interagency field inspection was conducted of the Kisaralik River in July 1978. Participating in the inspection were: Bureau of Land Management U.s. Fish & Wildlife Service State of AI;aska, Division Heritage Conseravtion & of Parks Recreation Service The following analysis is largel~ based on information obtained during the interagency field inspection; the Kisaralik River Report of August 7-14, 1976, by BLM staff (unpublished); the BOR aerial reconaissance in 1977; and library materials. THE RIVER AND ITS SETTING ~eral Setting The 3,000-4,000 foot high Kuskokwim Mountains run from near the central Yukon River in a southwest direction to the Bering Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Tanana Ethnographic Overview and Assessment, Wrangell St
    Technical Paper No. 325 Upper Tanana Ethnographic Overview and Assessment, Wrangell St. Elias National Park and Preserve by Terry L. Haynes and William E. Simeone July 2007 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Subsistence Symbols and Abbreviations The following symbols and abbreviations, and others approved for the Système International d'Unités (SI), are used without definition in the following reports by the Divisions of Sport Fish and of Commercial Fisheries: Fishery Manuscripts, Fishery Data Series Reports, Fishery Management Reports, and Special Publications. All others, including deviations from definitions listed below, are noted in the text at first mention, as well as in the titles or footnotes of tables, and in figure or figure captions. Weights and measures (metric) General Measures (fisheries) centimeter cm Alaska Administrative fork length FL deciliter dL Code AAC mideye-to-fork MEF gram g all commonly accepted mideye-to-tail-fork METF hectare ha abbreviations e.g., Mr., Mrs., standard length SL kilogram kg AM, PM, etc. total length TL kilometer km all commonly accepted liter L professional titles e.g., Dr., Ph.D., Mathematics, statistics meter m R.N., etc. all standard mathematical milliliter mL at @ signs, symbols and millimeter mm compass directions: abbreviations east E alternate hypothesis HA Weights and measures (English) north N base of natural logarithm e cubic feet per second ft3/s south S catch per unit effort CPUE foot ft west W coefficient of variation CV gallon gal copyright © common test statistics (F, t, χ2, etc.) inch in corporate suffixes: confidence interval CI mile mi Company Co. correlation coefficient nautical mile nmi Corporation Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • Denali National Park and Preserve
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Water Resources Stewardship Report Denali National Park and Preserve Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NRPC/WRD/NRTR—2007/051 ON THE COVER Photograph: Toklat River, Denali National Park and Preserve (Guy Adema, 2007) Water Resources Stewardship Report Denali National Park and Preserve Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NRPC/WRD/NRTR-2007/051 Kenneth F. Karle, P.E. Hydraulic Mapping and Modeling P.O. Box 181 Denali Park, Alaska 99755 September 2007 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resources Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer- reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resources Technical Reports series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission. The reports provide contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. Current examples of such reports include the results of research that addresses natural resource management issues; natural resource inventory and monitoring activities; resource assessment reports; scientific literature reviews; and peer reviewed proceedings of technical workshops, conferences, or symposia.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Native
    To conduct a simple search of the many GENERAL records of Alaska’ Native People in the National Archives Online Catalog use the search term Alaska Native. To search specific areas or villages see indexes and information below. Alaska Native Villages by Name A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Alaska is home to 229 federally recognized Alaska Native Villages located across a wide geographic area, whose records are as diverse as the people themselves. Customs, culture, artwork, and native language often differ dramatically from one community to another. Some are nestled within large communities while others are small and remote. Some are urbanized while others practice subsistence living. Still, there are fundamental relationships that have endured for thousands of years. One approach to understanding links between Alaska Native communities is to group them by language. This helps the student or researcher to locate related communities in a way not possible by other means. It also helps to define geographic areas in the huge expanse that is Alaska. For a map of Alaska Native language areas, see the generalized map of Alaska Native Language Areas produced by the University of Alaska at Fairbanks. Click on a specific language below to see Alaska federally recognized communities identified with each language. Alaska Native Language Groups (click to access associated Alaska Native Villages) Athabascan Eyak Tlingit Aleut Eskimo Haida Tsimshian Communities Ahtna Inupiaq with Mixed Deg Hit’an Nanamiut Language Dena’ina (Tanaina)
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrocarbon Potential of the Lower Kuskokwim River Area, Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta, Southwest Alaska
    August 14,1995 Price: $3.40 Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys PUBLIC-DATA FILE 95-28 HYDROCARBON POTENTIAL OF THE LOWER KUSKOKWIM RIVER AREA, YUKON-KUSKOKWIM DELTA, SOUTHWEST ALASKA by C.G. Mull, T.K. Bundtzen, and R.R. Reifenstuhl August 1995 THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED FOR TECHNICAL CONTENT (EXCEPT AS NOTED IN TEXT) OR FOR CONFORMITY TO THE EDITORIAL STANDARDS OF DGGS. Released by STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENTOF NATURAL RESOURCES Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys 794 University Avenue, Suite 200 Fairbanks. Alaska 99709-3645 HYDROCARBON POTENTIAL OF THE LOWER KUSKOKWIM RIVER AREA, YUKON-KUSKOKWIM DELTA, SOUTHWEST ALASKA TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION REGIONAL GEOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK Regional structure of the lower Kuskokwim River area SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY Napatuk Creek #I well Lithology Petrology Paleontology Thermal maturity Discussion of thermal maturity Drill stem tests Hydrocarbon source rock potential of Napatuk Creek well Discussion GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS Reflection seismic surveys Gravity surveys Airborne magnetic surveys 1994 airborne magnetic survey HYDROCARBON POTENTIAL OP THE LOWER KUSKOKWIM RIVER AREA Reservoir rocks Hydrocarbon source rock potential SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS REFERENCES CITED APPENDIX #1 Petrographic analysis of 19 thinsections LIST OF FIGURES Pig. 1 Index map to the lower Kuskokwim River area showing area of 1994 airborne magnetic survey Fig. 2 Generalized geologic map of the Yukon-Kuskokwim delta area, modified from map by Kirschner, 1988. A-A'---line of cross section Pig. 3 Generalized cross section of Kuskokwim delta area, modified from section by C.M. Molenaar, Shell Oil Company, 1962. Fig. 4 Induction electrical log and gamma ray log of interbedded Cretaceous sandstones and shales at 7,000 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Phonlab Annual Report
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley PhonLab Annual Report Title Phonetic Sources of Morphological Patterns in Sound Change: Fricative Voicing in Athabascan Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3xm9418n Journal UC Berkeley PhonLab Annual Report, 11(11) ISSN 2768-5047 Author Manker, Jonathan Publication Date 2015 DOI 10.5070/P73xm9418n eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report (2015) Phonetic Sources of Morphological Patterns in Sound Change: Fricative Voicing in Athabascan Jonathan Manker University of California, Berkeley While most modern Athabascan languages are described as having contrastive voicing in fricatives, the patterns of fricative voicing still follow both transparent and sometimes more complex morphological (as well as phonological) environments. While a synchronic analysis of the language seems to demonstrate a direct connection between phonological patterns and morphology, such an analysis may also suggest the possibility of morphological conditions in sound change, which has been proposed by some (Crowley 1997, Donohue 2005). This paper investigates the development of fricative voicing in two Athabascan languages and demonstrates that purely phonetic conditions can be identified that led to what appears to be a case of a morphologically conditioned sound change, following a similar analysis in Blevins & Lynch (2009). Both class-specific affixation and prominence patterns are shown to provide phonetic environments that may result in synchronic phonological patterns following morphological environments. 1. Introduction Early models of linguistic organization suggest the impossibility that non-phonetic factors (morphosyntax, semantics, etc.) can influence sound change. For example, the Neogrammarians proposed that sound change is a “purely phonetic process,” occurring under “strictly phonetic conditions” (Bloomfield 1933:364, concerning the Neogrammarians).
    [Show full text]
  • The Alaskan Athabascan Grammar Database
    The Alaskan Athabascan Grammar Database Sebastian Nordhoff, Siri Tuttle, Olga Lovick Glottotopia, Alaska Native Language Center, First Nations University of Canada Berlin, Fairbanks, Regina [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract This paper describes a repository of example sentences in three endangered Athabascan languages: Koyukon, Upper Tanana, Lower Tanana. The repository allows researchers or language teachers to browse the example sentence corpus to either investigate the languages or to prepare teaching materials. The originally heterogeneous text collection was imported into a SOLR store via the POIO bridge. This paper describes the requirements, implementation, advantages and drawbacks of this approach and discusses the potential to apply it for other languages of the Athabascan family or beyond. Keywords: Athabascan languages, linguistic examples, least-resourced languages 1. Introduction there is no syntax outside the verb. While this is not a seri- This paper presents the Alaskan Athabascan Grammar ous claim, it is still the case that syntactic research in Atha- Database (AAGD). bascan languages considerably lags behind that on mor- The goal of this database is to make available comparable phology cf. (Rice, 2000, 1) and phonology. annotated grammar examples from all eleven Athabascan languages, drawn from texts, lexicons, grey literature and 3. Use case new fieldwork, accessible to researchers and community The long term goal of this project is to make all existing members. This poses a number of technical and concep- textual data from the Athabascan languages in Alaska dig- tual challenges, which will be explored in this paper. itally available for (syntactic) research, complemented by new field data for the languages where data is lacking and 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Holton-2011-Alaska Landscape.Pdf
    John Benjamins Publishing Company This is a contribution from Landscape in Language. Transdisciplinary perspectives. Edited by David M. Mark, Andrew G. Turk, Niclas Burenhult and David Stea. © 2011. John Benjamins Publishing Company This electronic file may not be altered in any way. The author(s) of this article is/are permitted to use this PDF file to generate printed copies to be used by way of offprints, for their personal use only. Permission is granted by the publishers to post this file on a closed server which is accessible to members (students and staff) only of the author’s/s’ institute, it is not permitted to post this PDF on the open internet. For any other use of this material prior written permission should be obtained from the publishers or through the Copyright Clearance Center (for USA: www.copyright.com). Please contact [email protected] or consult our website: www.benjamins.com Tables of Contents, abstracts and guidelines are available at www.benjamins.com chapter 10 Differing conceptualizations of the same landscape The Athabaskan and Eskimo language boundary in Alaska Gary Holton This paper further explores the non-universality of landscape terms by focusing on one particular landscape, the Yukon Intermontane Plateau of western Alas- ka. This region serves as the boundary between two great language families of North America, Athabaskan and Eskimo, and thus offers a unique laboratory in which to examine the extent to which cultural factors in two genetically unrelat- ed languages influence the categorization of a single, fixed landscape. Drawing on published lexical sources, unpublished place name documentation, and first- hand interviews with Native speakers, the results presented here demonstrate that, while Athabaskan and Eskimo speakers may occupy the same landscape, their respective languages conceptualize that landscape in different ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Publication No. BOF 2018-06
    Special Publication No. BOF 2018-06 Overview of the Development and Implementation of the Kuskokwim River Household Subsistence King Salmon Permit System, 2018 by David M. Runfola Christopher R. McDevitt and Caroline L. Brown December 2018 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Subsistence Symbols and Abbreviations The following symbols and abbreviations, and others approved for the Système International d'Unités (SI), are used without definition in Division of Subsistence reports. All others, including deviations from definitions listed below, are noted in the text at first mention, in the titles or footnotes of tables, and in figures or figure captions. Weights and measures (metric) General Mathematics, statistics centimeter cm Alaska Administrative Code AAC all standard mathematical signs, deciliter dL all commonly-accepted symbols and abbreviations gram g abbreviations e.g., alternate hypothesis HA hectare ha Mr., Mrs., base of natural logarithm e kilogram kg AM, PM, etc. catch per unit effort CPUE kilometer km all commonly-accepted coefficient of variation CV liter L professional titles e.g., Dr., Ph.D., common test statistics (F, t, χ2, etc.) meter m R.N., etc. confidence interval CI milliliter mL at @ correlation coefficient (multiple) R millimeter mm compass directions: correlation coefficient (simple) r east E covariance cov Weights and measures (English) north N degree (angular ) ° cubic feet per second ft3/s south S degrees of freedom df foot ft west W expected value E gallon gal copyright greater than > inch in corporate suffixes: greater than or equal to ≥ mile mi Company Co. harvest per unit effort HPUE nautical mile nmi Corporation Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • Denali National Park and Preserve
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Denali National Park and Preserve Denali National Park and Preserve Center for Resources, Science, and Learning NPS Photo by Lucy Tyrrell Summary of Current Resource Projects 2005 Table of Contents Natural Resources ............................................................................................................... 3 Integrated Programs .............................................................................................................. 3 Central Alaska Network (CAKN) and Inventory and Monitoring at Denali........ 3 Proactive Approach to Protecting the Toklat Basin.................................................. 5 Plants........................................................................................................................................ 6 Off-Road Vehicle (ORV) Impacts................................................................................ 6 Long-term Monitoring.................................................................................................. 6 Removal of Exotic (Non-native) Plants ...................................................................... 8 Revegetation of Construction/Disturbed Sites.......................................................... 8 Revegetation .................................................................................................................... 9 Monitoring Dust Palliatives on the Park Road .......................................................... 9 Wildland Fire .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Cultural Overview of the Yukon Flats Region Prepared By: Kevin Bailey, USFWS Archaeologist Date: 2/12/2015 In
    Environmental and Cultural Overview of the Yukon Flats Region Prepared by: Kevin Bailey, USFWS Archaeologist Date: 2/12/2015 Introduction With a substantial population of Native people residing in their traditional homeland and living a modern traditional lifestyle, the Yukon Flats Refuge and all of the Alaskan Interior is a dynamic and living cultural landscape. The land, people, and wildlife form a tight, interrelated web of relationships extending thousands of years into the past. Natural features and human created “sites” form a landscape of meaning to the modern residents. The places and their meanings are highly relevant to modern residents, not just for people and culture but for the land. To many Gwich’in people culture is not distinct from their homeland. Although only minimally discussed in this overview, this dynamic living cultural landscape should be considered and discussed when writing about this area. Environmental Setting Containing the largest interior basin in Alaska, the Yukon Flats Refuge encompasses over 11 million acres of land in east central Alaska. Extending roughly 220 miles east-west along the Arctic Circle, the refuge lies between the Brooks Range to the north, and the White-Crazy Mountains to the south. The pipeline corridor runs along the refuge’s western boundary while the eastern boundary extends within 30 miles of the Canadian border. The Yukon River bisects the refuge, creating the dominant terrain. As many as 40,000 lakes, ponds, and streams may occur on the refuge, most concentrated in the flood plain along the Yukon and other rivers. Upland terrain, where lakes are less abundant, is the source of important drainage systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Text Supplement for Recorded Interviews with Elders in Minto and Nenana About 1 Earthquakes in Alaska (Archived at University of Alaska Fairbanks)
    Earthquake Stories from Minto and Nenana, Alaska Item Type Recording, oral; Report Authors Tape, Carl Download date 01/10/2021 18:19:51 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/5670 Text supplement for recorded interviews with elders in Minto and Nenana about 1 earthquakes in Alaska (archived at University of Alaska Fairbanks) Earthquake Stories from Minto and Nenana, Alaska Version 1: July 13, 2015 Version 21: September 12, 2018 Carl Tape, University of Alaska Fairbanks Email: [email protected] Summary of accounts of 1947 earthquake On Wednesday October 15, 1947 at 4:10pm local time, a magnitude 7.2 earthquake struck Interior Alaska, near Healy. This is a collection of stories of six life-long Alaskan elders who felt this earthquake and shared their recollections in fall of 2014, sixty-seven years after the earthquake. Geraldine Charlie had recently turned 18 years old and worked in the village store in Minto2 when the earthquake hit. Geraldine was crouching down to weigh a bag of potatoes at the moment the earthquake hit. She felt dizzy and noticed Coleman lanterns swaying from side to side, and items shook off the shelves. Sarah Silas and Berkman Silas were also in Minto and had been married for three years. Sarah recalls watching her toddler son, who laughed as he tried to maintain his balance as the floor rolled back and forth under his feet. Berkman and other men were ice fishing near Little Goldstream Creek when the earthquake hit. Rafting ice caused the men to run for the shore. Paul Esau was near Tolovana working on the roof of their home.
    [Show full text]