DOCSLIB.ORG

Combined Power and Biomass Heating System Fort Yukon, Alaska

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Combined Power and Biomass Heating System Fort Yukon, Alaska FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR A COMBINED POWER AND BIOMASS HEATING SYSTEM FORT YUKON, ALASKA U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy GOLDEN FIELD OFFICE In Cooperation with USDA RURAL UTILITIES SERVICE DENALI COMMISSION APRIL 2013 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ADEC Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation NEPA National Environmental Policy Act AFRPA Alaska Forest Resources Practices NFS Act Non‐Frost Susceptible BFE Base Flood Elevation NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service BMP best management practice NO2 nitrogen dioxide BTU British Thermal Unit NOX nitrogen oxide CATG Council of Athabascan Tribal Governments NPDES National Pollutant Discharge CEQ Council on Environmental Quality Elimination System CFR Code of Federal Regulations O3 Ozone CHP Combined Heat and Power OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration CO carbon monoxide Pb Lead CO2 carbon dioxide PM2.5 particulate Matter equal to or less CWA Clean Water Act than 2.5 microns in diameter dBA A-weighted decibel PM10 particulate Matter equal to or less than 10 microns in diameter DBH diameter at breast height ppb parts per billion DOE U.S. Department of Energy ppm parts per million EA Environmental Assessment PSD Prevention of Significant EFH Essential Fish Habitat Deterioration EO Executive Order RCA Regulatory Commission of Alaska Degrees Fahrenheit °F SO2 sulfur dioxide FEMA Federal Emergency Management SPCC Spill Prevention, Control, and Agency Countermeasure FONSI Finding of No Significant Impact SWPPP Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan GHG greenhouse gas TCC Tanana Chiefs Conference GZC Gwitchyaa Zhee Corporation U.S.C. United States Code GZGTG Gwitchyaa Zhee Gwich’in Tribal Government USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers GZU Gwitchyaa Zhee Utility Company USDA U.S. Department of Agriculture kVA kilovolt-ampere USEPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency kW kilowatt USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service mg/m3 milligram per cubic meter µg/m3 microgram per cubic meter VOC volatile organic compound FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR A COMBINED POWER AND BIOMASS HEATING SYSTEM FORT YUKON, ALASKA DOE/EA-1922 APRIL 2013 Final EA For A Combined Power and Biomass Heating System Fort Yukon, Alaska FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR A COMBINED POWER AND BIOMASS HEATING SYSTEM FORT YUKON, ALASKA TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ......................................................... INSIDE FRONT COVER 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 PROJECT LOCATION ................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 PURPOSE AND NEED ............................................................................................................... 1-3 1.3 ORGANIZATION AND OBJECTIVES OF THIS EA ....................................................................... 1-4 1.3.1 National Environmental Policy Act .......................................................................... 1-4 1.3.2 Integration of Other Environmental Statutes and Regulations .................................. 1-5 1.3.3 Scope of the Analysis ................................................................................................ 1-5 1.4 SCOPING AND PUBLIC/AGENCY INVOLVEMENT ..................................................................... 1-6 1.4.1 Community/Public Involvement ............................................................................... 1-6 1.4.2 Agency Consultations................................................................................................ 1-7 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES ...................................... 2-1 2.1 AGENCIES’ PROPOSED ACTION .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 PROPOSED PROJECT ................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.2.1 Construction of the CHP Plant and Distribution System .......................................... 2-2 2.2.2 Biomass Harvest ........................................................................................................ 2-4 2.2.3 Operation of the CHP Plant ....................................................................................... 2-8 2.2.4 Permits and Approvals .............................................................................................. 2-9 2.2.5 Applicant Committed Measures .............................................................................. 2-10 2.3 NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE ................................................................................................... 2-12 3. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ................... 3-1 3.1 RESOURCE AREAS DISMISSED FROM FURTHER ANALYSIS .................................................... 3-1 3.2 GEOLOGY AND SOIL RESOURCES ........................................................................................... 3-1 3.2.1 Affected Environment ............................................................................................... 3-1 3.2.2 Environmental Consequences of the Proposed Project ............................................. 3-2 3.2.3 Environmental Consequences of the No Action Alternative ..................................... 3-4 3.3 WATER RESOURCES ............................................................................................................... 3-5 3.3.1 Affected Environment ............................................................................................... 3-5 3.3.2 Environmental Consequences of the Proposed Project ............................................. 3-8 3.3.3 Environmental Consequences of the No Action Alternative ................................... 3-10 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ..................................................................................................... 3-11 3.4.1 Affected Environment ............................................................................................. 3-11 3.4.2 Environmental Consequences of the Proposed Project ........................................... 3-15 3.4.3 Environmental Consequences of the No Action Alternative ................................... 3-17 3.5 AIR QUALITY ........................................................................................................................ 3-17 3.5.1 Affected Environment ............................................................................................. 3-17 3.5.2 Environmental Consequences of the Proposed Project ........................................... 3-20 3.5.3 Environmental Consequences of the No Action Alternative ................................... 3-22 3.6 NOISE .................................................................................................................................... 3-22 Fort Yukon, Alaska April 2013 i Final EA For A Combined Power and Biomass Heating System Fort Yukon, Alaska TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) 3.6.1 Affected Environment ............................................................................................. 3-22 3.6.2 Environmental Consequences of the Proposed Project ........................................... 3-23 3.6.3 Environmental Consequences of the No Action Alternative ................................... 3-25 3.7 LAND USE ............................................................................................................................. 3-25 3.7.1 Affected Environment ............................................................................................. 3-25 3.7.2 Environmental Consequences of the Proposed Project ........................................... 3-25 3.7.3 Environmental Consequences of the No Action Alternative ................................... 3-26 3.8 CULTURAL AND HISTORIC RESOURCES ................................................................................ 3-26 3.8.1 Affected Environment ............................................................................................. 3-26 3.8.2 Environmental Consequences of the Proposed Project ........................................... 3-27 3.8.3 Environmental Consequences of the No Action Alternative ................................... 3-28 3.9 SOCIOECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ............................................................. 3-28 3.9.1 Affected Environment ............................................................................................. 3-28 3.9.2 Environmental Consequences of the Proposed Project ........................................... 3-29 3.9.3 Environmental Consequences of the No Action Alternative ................................... 3-30 3.10 TRANSPORTATION ................................................................................................................ 3-30 3.10.1 Affected Environment ............................................................................................. 3-30 3.10.2 Environmental Consequences of the Proposed Project ........................................... 3-31 3.10.3 Environmental Consequences of the No Action Alternative ................................... 3-32 3.11 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND WASTE MANAGEMENT ....................................................... 3-32 3.11.1 Affected Environment ............................................................................................. 3-32 3.11.2
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oregon State University Insert PDF 480 K
    ARCTIC Arctic Research Consortium of the United States Member Institution Winter 2004/2005, Volume 11 Number 2 Arctic Research at Oregon State University land grant university, Oregon State Geosciences A University was designated as Oregon’s state-assisted agricultural college in 1868. Polar Ice Cores Sea grant and space grant designation came Ed Brook (Geosciences) applies geochemical techniques to diverse problems in late Quater- later, making OSU one of only six universi- nary paleoclimatology; several of his projects have arctic components. NSF-supported work ties to have all three titles. OSU currently focused on the relative timing of millennial-scale abrupt climate change in Greenland and enrolls 15,599 undergraduate and 3,380 Antarctica uses atmospheric methane and the isotopic composition of oxygen as correlation graduate students in more than 200 under- tools to place climate records from the Siple Dome (west Antarctica) and GISP2 (Green- graduate and 80 graduate degree programs. land) ice cores on a precise common chronology for the period from 9–57 ka. The onset With collaborative connections across of major millennial warming events in Siple Dome precedes major abrupt warmings in the globe, OSU researchers contribute to Greenland, and the pattern of millennial change at Siple Dome is broadly similar, though arctic research from disciplines housed in not identical, to that previously observed for the Byrd ice core (also in west Antarctica). a variety of colleges. The College of Oce- The addition of Siple Dome to the database of well-dated Antarctic paleoclimate records anic and Atmospheric Sciences (COAS) supports the case for a regionally consistent pattern of millennial-scale climate change in has several researchers working on arctic Antarctica during the last ice age and glacial-interglacial transition.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 NATIONAL FLIGHT DATA DIGEST Aeronautical Information
    NATIONAL FLIGHT DATA DIGEST Aeronautical Information Services National Flight Data Center Toll Free 1-866-295-8236 Wednesday NO. 076 04/21/2021 EFFECTIVE UPON PUBLICATION UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED BY AN EFFECTIVE DATE NAVAIDS ALASKA NFDD 076 - 1 04/21/2021 ADAK ISLAND ADAK TACAN IDENT BER LAT 51-52-16.43 N LONG 176-40-26.8 W MAG VAR 7 E MODIFIED NORTH DAKOTA NFDD 076 - 2 04/21/2021 GRAND FORKS RED RIVER TACAN IDENT RDR LAT 47-57-25.41 N LONG 097-24-21.69 W RMK ....MILITARY VALIDATED (FIL FIDEX-RDR-200033).... NOTE RMK DME UNUSBL 209-219 BYD 30 NM. MODIFIED WAKE ISLAND NFDD 076 - 3 04/21/2021 WAKE ISLAND WAKE ISLAND VORTAC IDENT AWK LAT 19-17-11.69 N LONG 166-37-38.4 E NAVAID STATUS OPERATIONAL IFR MODIFIED RMK ....MILITARY VALIDATED (FIL FIDEX-AWK-200127).... NOTE RMK VOR UNUSBL 120-175 BYD 35 NM. DELETED INSTRUMENT LANDING SYSTEMS GEORGIA NFDD 076 - 1 04/21/2021 ATLANTA ATLANTA RGNL FALCON FLD AIRPORT ILS/DME RWY 31 IDENT I-FFC DME DME STATUS OPERATIONAL IFR MODIFIED RMK DME UNUSBL BYD 25 DEGS L OF CRS. DELETED RMK ILS CLASSIFICATION CODE IA. MODIFIED Page 1 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWERS MICHIGAN NFDD 076 - 1 04/21/2021 SAGINAW MBS INTL-ATCT IDENT MBS FREQUENCIES FREQUENCY 118.45 DELETED FREQUENCY USE ASR DELETED APCH/DEP CALL GREAT LAKES FREQUENCY 120.95 DELETED FREQUENCY USE APCH/S DEP/S DELETED AIRPORT ALASKA NFDD 076 - 1 04/21/2021 ATQASUK ATQASUK EDWARD BURNELL SR MEML AIRPORT ( ATK ) 50044.5A LATITUDE - 70-28-01.6 N LONGITUDE - 157-26-08.4 W RMK COLD TEMPERATURE RESTRICTED AIRPORT.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Adjustments to Service Obligations
    Served: May 12, 2020 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. CONTINUATION OF CERTAIN AIR SERVICE PURSUANT TO PUBLIC LAW NO. 116-136 §§ 4005 AND 4114(b) Docket DOT-OST-2020-0037 NOTICE OF ADJUSTMENTS TO SERVICE OBLIGATIONS Summary By this notice, the U.S. Department of Transportation (the Department) announces an opportunity for incremental adjustments to service obligations under Order 2020-4-2, issued April 7, 2020, in light of ongoing challenges faced by U.S. airlines due to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) public health emergency. With this notice as the initial step, the Department will use a systematic process to allow covered carriers1 to reduce the number of points they must serve as a proportion of their total service obligation, subject to certain restrictions explained below.2 Covered carriers must submit prioritized lists of points to which they wish to suspend service no later than 5:00 PM (EDT), May 18, 2020. DOT will adjudicate these requests simultaneously and publish its tentative decisions for public comment before finalizing the point exemptions. As explained further below, every community that was served by a covered carrier prior to March 1, 2020, will continue to receive service from at least one covered carrier. The exemption process in Order 2020-4-2 will continue to be available to air carriers to address other facts and circumstances. Background On March 27, 2020, the President signed the Coronavirus Aid, Recovery, and Economic Security Act (the CARES Act) into law. Sections 4005 and 4114(b) of the CARES Act authorize the Secretary to require, “to the extent reasonable and practicable,” an air carrier receiving financial assistance under the Act to maintain scheduled air transportation service as the Secretary deems necessary to ensure services to any point served by that air carrier before March 1, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Climate Change Implications for U.S
    Arctic Climate Change Implications for U.S. National Security Perspective - Laura Leddy September 2020 i BOARD OF DIRECTORS The Honorable Gary Hart, Chairman Emeritus Scott Gilbert Senator Hart served the State of Colorado in the U.S. Senate Scott Gilbert is a Partner of Gilbert LLP and Managing and was a member of the Committee on Armed Services Director of Reneo LLC. during his tenure. Vice Admiral Lee Gunn, USN (Ret.) Governor Christine Todd Whitman, Chairperson Vice Admiral Gunn is Vice Chairman of the CNA Military Christine Todd Whitman is the President of the Whitman Advisory Board, Former Inspector General of the Department Strategy Group, a consulting firm that specializes in energy of the Navy, and Former President of the Institute of Public and environmental issues. Research at the CNA Corporation. The Honorable Chuck Hagel Brigadier General Stephen A. Cheney, USMC (Ret.), Chuck Hagel served as the 24th U.S. Secretary of Defense and President of ASP served two terms in the United States Senate (1997-2009). Hagel Brigadier General Cheney is the President of ASP. was a senior member of the Senate Foreign Relations; Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs; and Intelligence Committees. Matthew Bergman Lieutenant General Claudia Kennedy, USA (Ret.) Matthew Bergman is an attorney, philanthropist and Lieutenant General Kennedy was the first woman entrepreneur based in Seattle. He serves as a Trustee of Reed to achieve the rank of three-star general in the United States College on the Board of Visitors of Lewis & Clark Law Army. School. Ambassador Jeffrey Bleich The Honorable John F. Kerry The Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Yukon Hunting / Unit 25
    Fort Yukon Hunting / Unit 25 $UFWLF9LOODJH &KDQGDODU :LVHPDQ &KULVWLDQ &ROGIRRW 9HQHWLH &KDON\LWVLN )RUW<XNRQ %HDYHU %LUFK&UHHN 6WHYHQV9LOODJH )RUW+DPOLQ &LUFOH &HQWUDO 5DPSDUW /LYHQJRRG &LUFOH+RW6SULQJV (XUHND 0LQWR )R[ &KHQD )$,5%$1.6 +RW (DJOH 6SULQJV Federal Public Lands Open to Subsistence Use 2014/2016 Federal Subsistence Wildlife Regulations 115 Unit 25 / Hunting (See Unit 25 Fort Yukon map) Unit 25 consists of the Yukon River drainage upstream from (but excluding) the Hamlin Creek drainage; and excluding drainages into the south bank of the Yukon River upstream from the Charley River. Unit 25A consists of the Hodzana River drainage rivers; and drainages into the north bank of the Yukon River upstream from the Narrows; the Chandalar River drainage upstream from Circle, including the islands in the Yukon upstream from (and including) the East Fork drainage; River. the Christian River drainage upstream from Christian; the Unit 25C consists of drainages into the south bank of Sheenjek River drainage upstream from (and including) the the Yukon River upstream from Circle to the Unit 20E Thluichohnjik Creek; the Coleen River drainage; and the boundary; the Birch Creek drainage upstream from the Old Crow River drainage. Steese Highway bridge (milepost 147); the Preacher Creek Unit 25B consists of the Little Black River drainage drainage upstream from (and including) the Rock Creek upstream from (but excluding) the Big Creek drainage; drainage; and the Beaver Creek drainage upstream from the Black River drainage upstream from (and including) (and including) the Moose Creek drainage. the Salmon Fork drainage; the Porcupine River drainage Unit 25D consists of the remainder of Unit 25.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Forest Conservation in the Pacific Northwest, 1891-1913
    A HISTORY OF FOREST CONSERVATION IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST, 1891-1913 By LAWRENCE RAKESTRAW 1955 Copyright 1979 by Lawrence Rakestraw A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON 1955 TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER LIST OF MAPS LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS LIST OF TABLES ABSTRACT PREFACE CHAPTER 1. BACKGROUND OF THE FOREST CONSERVATION MOVEMENT, 1860-91 2. RESERVES IN THE NORTHWEST, 1891-97 3. FOREST ADMINISTRATION, NATIONAL AND LOCAL, 1897-1905 4. GRAZING IN THE CASCADE RANGE, 1897-99: MUIR VS. MINTO 5. RESERVES IN WASHINGTON, BOUNDARY WORK, 1897-1907 I. The Olympic Elimination II. The Whatcom Excitement III. Rainier Reserve IV. Other Reserves 6. RESERVES IN OREGON, BOUNDARY WORK, 1897-1907 I. Background II. The Cascade Range Reserve III. The Siskiyou Reserve IV. The Blue Mountain Reserve V. Other Reserves in Eastern Oregon VI. Reserves in the Southern and Eastern Oregon Grazing Lands VII. 1907 Reserves 7. THE NATIONAL FORESTS IN DISTRICT SIX, 1905-1913 I. E. T. Allen II. Personnel and Public Relations in District Six III. Grazing IV. Timber: Fires, Sales and Research V. Lands 8. THE TRIPLE ALLIANCE I. Background II. The Timber Industry III. Political Currents IV. The Triple Alliance V. Conclusion BIBLIOGRAPHY ENDNOTES VITA LIST OF MAPS MAP 1. Scene of the Whatcom Excitement 2. Rainier Reserve 3. Proposed Pengra Elimination 4. Temporary Withdrawals in Oregon, 1903 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS ILLUSTRATION 1. Copy of Blank Contract Found in a Squatter's Cabin, in T. 34 N., R. 7 E., W.M. LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Regular Council Meeting Will Be Held in the Municipal Council Chambers on Tuesday, October 9, 2018 at 7:30 P.M
    A REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING WILL BE HELD IN THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 9, 2018 AT 7:30 P.M. A G E N D A CALL MEETING TO ORDER: 6:45 P.M. RESOLUTION TO MOVE INTO IN-CAMERA AND CLOSE THE MEETING TO THE PUBLIC PURSUANT TO DIVISION 3, SECTION 90(1) (l) OF THE COMMUNITY CHARTER (to discuss matters relating to discussions with municipal officers and employees respecting municipal objectives, measures, and progress reports). 7:30 PM - REGULAR MEETING ADDENDUM: DELEGATIONS OR GUESTS: MINUTES: Regular Council Meeting, September 24, 2018 BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES (OLD BUSINESS): CORRESPONDENCE: RESOLUTION TO MOVE INTO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE – DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COMPONENT: 1. Temporary Use Permit No. 02-2018 – Progressive Venture Ltd. (5412 & 5414 Highway 16 West) 2. Zoning Amendment – Global Dewatering Ltd. (3800 Jack Talstra Way) COMMITTEE REPORTS: Committee of the Whole (Development Services Component), October 9, 2018 (verbal) Committee of the Whole Report, September 20, 2018 Committee of the Whole Report, September 21, 2018 Committee of the Whole Finance, Personnel and Administration Component Report, September 27, 2018 Committee of the Whole Report, October 2, 2018 COMMITTEE REPORTS (FOR INFORMATION ONLY): Committee of the Whole (Development Services Component), September 24, 2018 SPECIAL REPORTS: Memo – Economic Development Manager, Funding Applications for Skeena Industrial Development Park Marketing Strategy Memo – Director of Development Services, City of Terrace Noise Control Bylaw
    [Show full text]
  • 1 'Namgis First Nation Council Meeting March 3, 2016 9:30Am
    ‘Namgis First Nation Council Meeting March 3, 2016 9:30am Council Chambers Council: Chief Debra Hanuse; Councillors Sharon Gordon; Kelly Speck; Robert Mountain; Steven Smith Bill Wasden (1pm) Staff: Administrator Hopeton Louden; Assistant Administrator Verna Ambers; Record Keeper Gina Wadhams Open Meeting 9:30am Agenda MOTION #2474: SHARON GORDON/STEVEN SMITH That the agenda be accepted with amendments/addition of ‘Tides of Change’. CARRIED Minutes TABLED until afternoon Council minutes to be together for Debra Hanuse to sign for auditors. A ‘true copy’ – with all corrections/amendments Decision in the past to compile all Council minutes in a binder – all stored in a central place for Council to read through. Minutes are missing – need access to computer with minutes file. Systems Administrator can access all work stations. Minutes/Website Question on why approved minutes are not posted to website. Administration will review and ensure that this happens. Gina Wadhams will ensure the minutes are on website FA #18 AANDC AANDC Amendment #0018 2015/2016 Fiscal Year TEFA $10,141.00. Instructional Services Formula for Low Enrolment MOTION #2475: KELLY SPECK/STEVEN SMITH Approve the signing of AANDC Amendment #0018 2016/2016 Fiscal Year TEFA. CARRIED Amendments #9-17 have been misplaced. These will be needed for audit. Health Centre Policy binder distributed to Council. Council requires a briefing note on the policies. Policies Concern with this coming to Council now with a request for approval by March 31, 2016 with Procedures no background information. Accreditation Request briefing note from Georgia Cook. BY CONSENSUS: That Committee reports and recommendations come to Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Election District Report
    Fiscal Year 1992 Election District Report Legislative Finance Division P.O. BoxWF Juneau, Alaska 99811 (907) 465-3795 TABLE OF CONTENTS ELECTION DISTRICT PAGE NUMBER Summaries ........................................................... III - VI 01 Ketchikan - Wrangell - Petersburg. 1 02 Inside Passage . .. 7 03 Baranof - Chichagof. .. 11 04 Juneau. .. 15 05 Kenai - Cook Inlet . .. 21 06 Prince William Sound . .. 25 07 - 15 Anchorage .............................................................. 31 16 Matanuska - Susitna . .. 61 17 Interior Highways. .. 67 18 Southeast North Star Borough. .. 71 19 - 21 Fairbanks . .. 73 22 North Slope ~- Kotzebue ..................................................... 79 23 Norton Sound ........................................................... 83 24 Interior Rivers . 89 25 Lower Kuskokwim ......... ~.............................................. 93 26 Bristol Bay - Aleutian Islands . 97 27 Kodiak - East Alaska Peninsula ... .. 101 99 Statewide & Totals. .. 107 I II FY92 CAPITAL BUDGET /REAPPROPRIATIONS (CH 96, SLA 91) - AFTER VETOES ELECTION CAPITAL CAPITAL REAPPROP REAPPROP DISTRICT GENFUNDS TOTAL FUNDS GENFUNDS TOTAL FUNDS TOTALS 1 21,750.1 35,266.3 0.0 0.0 35,266.3 2 8,223.8 15,195.6 0.0 0.0 15,195.6 3 3,524.8 6,446.1 0.0 0.0 6,446.1 4 8,397.2 19,387.0 1,360.0 1,360.0 20,747.0 5 11,885.0 16,083.9 0.0 0.0 16,083.9 6 5,315.0 14,371.1 0.0 0.0 14,371.1 7 - 15 73,022.9 99,167.9 -95.3 -95.3 99,072.6 16 13,383.0 66,817.2 -20.0 -20.0 66,797.2 17 6,968.5 39,775.5 0.0 0.0 39,775.5 18 2,103.6 2,753.6 0.0 0.0 2,753.6
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Tanana Ethnographic Overview and Assessment, Wrangell St
    Technical Paper No. 325 Upper Tanana Ethnographic Overview and Assessment, Wrangell St. Elias National Park and Preserve by Terry L. Haynes and William E. Simeone July 2007 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Subsistence Symbols and Abbreviations The following symbols and abbreviations, and others approved for the Système International d'Unités (SI), are used without definition in the following reports by the Divisions of Sport Fish and of Commercial Fisheries: Fishery Manuscripts, Fishery Data Series Reports, Fishery Management Reports, and Special Publications. All others, including deviations from definitions listed below, are noted in the text at first mention, as well as in the titles or footnotes of tables, and in figure or figure captions. Weights and measures (metric) General Measures (fisheries) centimeter cm Alaska Administrative fork length FL deciliter dL Code AAC mideye-to-fork MEF gram g all commonly accepted mideye-to-tail-fork METF hectare ha abbreviations e.g., Mr., Mrs., standard length SL kilogram kg AM, PM, etc. total length TL kilometer km all commonly accepted liter L professional titles e.g., Dr., Ph.D., Mathematics, statistics meter m R.N., etc. all standard mathematical milliliter mL at @ signs, symbols and millimeter mm compass directions: abbreviations east E alternate hypothesis HA Weights and measures (English) north N base of natural logarithm e cubic feet per second ft3/s south S catch per unit effort CPUE foot ft west W coefficient of variation CV gallon gal copyright © common test statistics (F, t, χ2, etc.) inch in corporate suffixes: confidence interval CI mile mi Company Co. correlation coefficient nautical mile nmi Corporation Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Policy &
    Arctic Policy & Law References to Selected Documents Edited by Wolfgang E. Burhenne Prepared by Jennifer Kelleher and Aaron Laur Published by the International Council of Environmental Law – toward sustainable development – (ICEL) for the Arctic Task Force of the IUCN Commission on Environmental Law (IUCN-CEL) Arctic Policy & Law References to Selected Documents Edited by Wolfgang E. Burhenne Prepared by Jennifer Kelleher and Aaron Laur Published by The International Council of Environmental Law – toward sustainable development – (ICEL) for the Arctic Task Force of the IUCN Commission on Environmental Law The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of ICEL or the Arctic Task Force of the IUCN Commission on Environmental Law concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers and boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of ICEL or the Arctic Task Force. The preparation of Arctic Policy & Law: References to Selected Documents was a project of ICEL with the support of the Elizabeth Haub Foundations (Germany, USA, Canada). Published by: International Council of Environmental Law (ICEL), Bonn, Germany Copyright: © 2011 International Council of Environmental Law (ICEL) Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non- commercial purposes is authorized without prior permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: International Council of Environmental Law (ICEL) (2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Boats Built at Toledo, Ohio Including Monroe, Michigan
    Boats Built at Toledo, Ohio Including Monroe, Michigan A Comprehensive Listing of the Vessels Built from Schooners to Steamers from 1810 to the Present Written and Compiled by: Matthew J. Weisman and Paula Shorf National Museum of the Great Lakes 1701 Front Street, Toledo, Ohio 43605 Welcome, The Great Lakes are not only the most important natural resource in the world, they represent thousands of years of history. The lakes have dramatically impacted the social, economic and political history of the North American continent. The National Museum of the Great Lakes tells the incredible story of our Great Lakes through over 300 genuine artifacts, a number of powerful audiovisual displays and 40 hands-on interactive exhibits including the Col. James M. Schoonmaker Museum Ship. The tales told here span hundreds of years, from the fur traders in the 1600s to the Underground Railroad operators in the 1800s, the rum runners in the 1900s, to the sailors on the thousand-footers sailing today. The theme of the Great Lakes as a Powerful Force runs through all of these stories and will create a lifelong interest in all who visit from 5 – 95 years old. Toledo and the surrounding area are full of early American History and great places to visit. The Battle of Fallen Timbers, the War of 1812, Fort Meigs and the early shipbuilding cities of Perrysburg and Maumee promise to please those who have an interest in local history. A visit to the world-class Toledo Art Museum, the fine dining along the river, with brew pubs and the world famous Tony Packo’s restaurant, will make for a great visit.
    [Show full text]