DOCSLIB.ORG

Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Biological Sampling of Nonsalmon Fish Species in the Yukon Flats Region, Alaska

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Biological Sampling of Nonsalmon Fish Species in the Yukon Flats Region, Alaska Technical Paper No. 362 Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Biological Sampling of Nonsalmon Fish Species in the Yukon Flats Region, Alaska by Michael Koskey, University of Alaska Fairbanks and Kristin Mull, Bureau of Land Management May 2011 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Subsistence Symbols and Abbreviations The following symbols and abbreviations, and others approved for the Système International d'Unités (SI), are used without definition in the reports by the Division of Subsistence. All others, including deviations from definitions listed below, are noted in the text at first mention, as well as in the titles or footnotes of tables, and in figure or figure captions. Weights and measures (metric) General Mathematics, statistics centimeter cm Alaska Administrative Code AAC all standard mathematical signs, symbols deciliter dL all commonly-accepted and abbreviations gram g abbreviations e.g., alternate hypothesis HA hectare ha Mr., Mrs., base of natural logarithm e kilogram kg AM, PM, etc. catch per unit effort CPUE kilometer km all commonly-accepted coefficient of variation CV liter L professional titles e.g., Dr., Ph.D., common test statistics (F, t, 2, etc.) meter m R.N., etc. confidence interval CI milliliter mL at @ correlation coefficient (multiple) R millimeter mm compass directions: correlation coefficient (simple) r east E covariance cov Weights and measures (English) north N degree (angular ) ° cubic feet per second ft3/s south S degrees of freedom df foot ft west W expected value E gallon gal copyright greater than > inch in corporate suffixes: greater than or equal to mile mi Company Co. harvest per unit effort HPUE nautical mile nmi Corporation Corp. less than < ounce oz Incorporated Inc. less than or equal to pound lb Limited Ltd. logarithm (natural) ln quart qt District of Columbia D.C. logarithm (base 10) log yard yd et alii (and others) et al. logarithm (specify base) log2, etc. et cetera (and so forth) etc. minute (angular) ' Time and temperature exempli gratia (for example) e.g. not significant NS day d Federal Information Code FIC null hypothesis HO degrees Celsius °C id est (that is) i.e. percent % degrees Fahrenheit °F latitude or longitude lat. or long. probability P degrees kelvin K monetary symbols (U.S.) $, ¢ probability of a type I error (rejection of the hour h months (tables and figures) first three null hypothesis when true) minute min letters (Jan,...,Dec) probability of a type II error (acceptance of second s registered trademark the null hypothesis when false) trademark second (angular) " Physics and chemistry United States (adjective) U.S. standard deviation SD all atomic symbols United States of America (noun) USA standard error SE alternating current AC U.S.C. United States Code variance ampere A U.S. state two-letter abbreviations population Var calorie cal (e.g., AK, WA) sample var direct current DC hertz Hz Measures (fisheries) horsepower hp fork length FL hydrogen ion activity (negative log of) pH mideye-to-fork MEF parts per million ppm mideye-to-tail-fork METF parts per thousand ppt, ‰ standard length SL volts V total length TL watts W TECHNICAL PAPER NO. 362 TRADITIONAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE AND BIOLOGICAL SAMPLING OF NONSALMON FISH SPECIES IN THE YUKON FLATS REGION, ALASKA FINAL REPORT FOR STUDY 06-252 by Michael Koskey, University of Alaska, Department of Alaska Native and Rural Development, Fairbanks and Kristin Mull, U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Fairbanks District Office, Fairbanks Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Subsistence 1300 College Road, Fairbanks, Alaska, 99710-1599 May 2011 Development and publication of this manuscript were partially financed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Subsistence Management, Fisheries Resource Monitoring Program, under agreement number 701816C256. The Division of Subsistence Technical Paper series was established in 1979 and represents the most complete collection of information about customary and traditional uses of fish and wildlife resources in Alaska. The papers cover all regions of the state. Some papers were written in response to specific fish and game management issues. Others provide detailed, basic information on the subsistence uses of particular communities which pertain to a large number of scientific and policy questions. Technical Paper series reports are available through the Alaska State Library and on the Internet: http://www.adfg.alaska.gov/sf/publications/. This technical paper is essentially a reprint, to fulfill contract obligations, of a final report accepted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Office of Subsistence Management Fisheries Resource Division for project number 06-252. The assertions, results, and conclusions expressed in this report are the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the State of Alaska, the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, or the Division of Subsistence. Product names do not constitute endorsement. The following minor punctuation and layout changes, none of which have affected the content, meaning, or import of the report, have been applied by the Division of Subsistence: typographical errors have been corrected, capitalization and abbreviations have been made consistent, hyphens between data ranges have been changed to en dashes, unnecessary hyphens have been eliminated. Michael Koskey, University of Alaska, Department of Alaska Native and Rural Development, Fairbanks, AK, 99775-6500, USA Kristin Mull, U. S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Fairbanks District Office 1150 University Ave., Fairbanks, AK, 99709, USA This document should be cited as: Koskey, M. and K. Mull. 2010. Traditional ecological knowledge and biological sampling of nonsalmon fish species in the Yukon Flats region, Alaska. Final report for study 06-252. Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Subsistence Technical Paper No. 362, Fairbanks. The Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G) administers all programs and activities free from discrimination based on race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion, marital status, pregnancy, parenthood, or disability. The department administers all programs and activities in compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility please write: ADF&G ADA Coordinator, P.O. Box 115526, Juneau, AK, 99811-5526 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 4040 N. Fairfax Drive, MS 2042, Arlington, VA, 22203 Office of Equal Opportunity, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street NW, MS 5230, Washington DC 20240 The department’s ADA Coordinator can be reached via phone at the following numbers: (VOICE) 907-465-6077, (Statewide Telecommunication Device for the Deaf) 1-800-478-3648, (Juneau TDD) 907-465-3646, or (FAX) 907-465-6078 For information on alternative formats and questions on this publication, please contact: ADF&G Division of Subsistence at www.adfg.alaska.gov/index.cfm?adfg=contacts.anchorage. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF PLATES ....................................................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF APPENDICES .............................................................................................................................................. iv ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................................................................ 5 METHODS .................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Collection of Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) ............................................................................................... 6 Harvest and Biological Assessments ............................................................................................................................. 8 Harvest Surveys ........................................................................................................................................................... 10 Sampling Goals ....................................................................................................................................................... 11 Pre-fieldwork Training ........................................................................................................................................... 11 Data Collection Phase ............................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • View: Local and Traditional Knowledge in the Peel River Watershed
    Literature Review: Local and Traditional Knowledge in the Peel River Watershed Literature Review Local and Traditional Knowledge In the Peel River Watershed _____________________________________ Brenda Parlee and Chelsea Martin I = i Parlee, B. and C. Martin ©2019 Tracking Change Project, University of Alberta All rights reserved. Compiled in October 2016. ii Literature Review: Local and Traditional Knowledge in the Peel River Watershed TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................... iii List of Figues and Tables ............................................................................................................. iv Summary Points ............................................................................................................................ 1 Summary of Knowledge by Indicator Theme .......................................................................................... 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 2 Methods .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Searching for Secondary Sources of Publically Available Traditional Knowledge ................................. 3 Early Ethnographic Data .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Yukon Hunting / Unit 25
    Fort Yukon Hunting / Unit 25 $UFWLF9LOODJH &KDQGDODU :LVHPDQ &KULVWLDQ &ROGIRRW 9HQHWLH &KDON\LWVLN )RUW<XNRQ %HDYHU %LUFK&UHHN 6WHYHQV9LOODJH )RUW+DPOLQ &LUFOH &HQWUDO 5DPSDUW /LYHQJRRG &LUFOH+RW6SULQJV (XUHND 0LQWR )R[ &KHQD )$,5%$1.6 +RW (DJOH 6SULQJV Federal Public Lands Open to Subsistence Use 2014/2016 Federal Subsistence Wildlife Regulations 115 Unit 25 / Hunting (See Unit 25 Fort Yukon map) Unit 25 consists of the Yukon River drainage upstream from (but excluding) the Hamlin Creek drainage; and excluding drainages into the south bank of the Yukon River upstream from the Charley River. Unit 25A consists of the Hodzana River drainage rivers; and drainages into the north bank of the Yukon River upstream from the Narrows; the Chandalar River drainage upstream from Circle, including the islands in the Yukon upstream from (and including) the East Fork drainage; River. the Christian River drainage upstream from Christian; the Unit 25C consists of drainages into the south bank of Sheenjek River drainage upstream from (and including) the the Yukon River upstream from Circle to the Unit 20E Thluichohnjik Creek; the Coleen River drainage; and the boundary; the Birch Creek drainage upstream from the Old Crow River drainage. Steese Highway bridge (milepost 147); the Preacher Creek Unit 25B consists of the Little Black River drainage drainage upstream from (and including) the Rock Creek upstream from (but excluding) the Big Creek drainage; drainage; and the Beaver Creek drainage upstream from the Black River drainage upstream from (and including) (and including) the Moose Creek drainage. the Salmon Fork drainage; the Porcupine River drainage Unit 25D consists of the remainder of Unit 25.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Five
    CHAPTER 5: CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION Chapter 5: Consultation and Coordination 5 Consultation and Coordination 5.1 Introduction This section summarizes the public and agency outreach program the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has undertaken for the proposed land exchange. Pre-scoping meetings were held in early 2005, before the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was initiated, in Anchorage, Arctic Village, Beaver, Birch Creek, Central, Chalkyitsik, Circle, Fairbanks, Fort Yukon, Stevens Village, and Venetie. These meetings provided the public with the opportunity to review the Agreement in Principle (Appendix A) and the Service document, “Evaluation and Review of a Proposed Land Exchange and Acquisition of Native Lands,” and were part of a 6- month comment period. In response to requests from the public and from Doyon, Limited (Doyon), the Service agreed to prepare an EIS and engage in the second phase of outreach, formal scoping. 5.2 Formal Scoping The Service published a Notice of Intent for the Proposed Land Exchange in the Federal Register on October 19, 2005 (Federal Register, Volume 70, Number 201, Pages 60845-60846). The Notice of Intent included a summary of the proposed project, the draft alternatives, and issues of concern raised during pre-scoping. A separate notice published in the Federal Register on March 3, 2006 (Federal Register, Volume 71, Number 42, Page 10988), announced the locations, dates, and times of public scoping meetings in Anchorage and Fairbanks, and names of Yukon Flats villages where scoping meetings were to be held. The March 3, 2006, notice stated that comments would be accepted until April 15, 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Controls on Recent Alaskan Lake Changes Identified from Water Isotopes and Remote Sensing Lesleigh Anderson USGS, [email protected]
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USGS Staff -- ubP lished Research US Geological Survey 2013 Controls on recent Alaskan lake changes identified from water isotopes and remote sensing Lesleigh Anderson USGS, [email protected] Jennifer Rover Earth Resource Observation and Science, U.S. Geological Survey Nikki Gaulager Yukon Flats National Wildlife Refuge Jean Birks Alberta Innovates Technology Futures Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub Part of the Geology Commons, Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons, Other Earth Sciences Commons, and the Other Environmental Sciences Commons Anderson, Lesleigh; Rover, Jennifer; Gaulager, Nikki; and Birks, Jean, "Controls on recent Alaskan lake changes identified from water isotopes and remote sensing" (2013). USGS Staff -- Published Research. 801. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub/801 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the US Geological Survey at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USGS Staff -- ubP lished Research by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 40, 3413–3418, doi:10.1002/grl.50672, 2013 Controls on recent Alaskan lake changes identified from water isotopes and remote sensing Lesleigh Anderson,1 Jean Birks,2 Jennifer Rover,3 and Nikki Guldager4 Received 13 May 2013; revised 13 June 2013; accepted 16 June 2013; published 12 July 2013. [1] High-latitude lakes are important for terrestrial carbon regions [Riordan et al., 2006; Smith et al., 2005]. Lake sur- dynamics and waterfowl habitat driving a need to better face observations are available in Alaska from early aerial understand controls on lake area changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Inventory of the Yukon Flats As Potential Wood Bison Range
    HABITAT INVENTORY OF THE YUKON FLATS AS POTENTIAL WOOD .BISON RANGE Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Wildlife Conservation March 1995 .. • I • J.• . .I .. - Photo by C. Gates Maria Berger Alaska Cooperative Fisheries and Wildlife Research Unit University of Alaska Fairbanks Robert 0. St~!enson Alaska Depa ent of Fish and Game Fairbanks, Alaska · Paul Karczmarczyk Alaska Department of Fish and Game Delta Junction, Alaska · C. Cormack Gates Government of the Northwest Territories Fort Smith, NWT STATE OF ALASKA 0 Tony Knowles, Governor DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME Frank Rue, Commissioner DMSION OF WILDLIFE CONSERVATION Wayne L. Regelin, Acting Director Persons intending to cite this material should obtain pennission from the author(s) and/or the Alaska Department of Fish and Game. Because most reports deal with preliminary results of continuing studies, conclusions are tentative and should be identified as such. Due credit will be appreciated. This report was prepared by: Alaska Department ofFish and Game 1300 College Road Fairbanks, Alaska 99701-1599 (907) 459-7213 The Alaska Department of Fish and Game conducts all programs and activities free from discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, marital status, pregnancy, parenthood, or disability. For information on alternative formats for this and other department publications, please contact the department ADA Coordinator at (voice) 907-465-4120, (TDD) 1-800-478-3648, or FAX 907-586-6595. Any person who believes she/he has been discriminated against should write to: Alaska Department ofFish and Game, P.O. Box 25526, Juneau, AK 99802-5526 or O.E.O., U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Trappers and the Hudson's Bay Company: Early Means of Negotiation in the Canadian Fur Trade
    31 Indian Trappers and the Hudson's Bay Company: Early Means of Negotiation in the Canadian Fur Trade DerekHoneyman, University of Arizona Abstract:The fur trade and arrival of the Hudson's Bay Company had numerous effects on northern North American indigenous populations. One such groupisthe Gwich'in Indiansinthe northwestern portion of the Northwest Territories. Aside from disease and continued reliance on goods imported from the south, the furtradedisruptedprevious economicrelationships between indigenous groups. In some examples, the presence of the Hudson's Bay Company furthered tension between indigenous groups as each vied for the control of fur-rich regions and sole access to specific Company posts. However, due to the frontier nature of the Canadian north, the relations between fur trade companies and indigenous peoples was one of mutual accommodation. This was in stark contrast to other European-Indian relations. This paper examines how credit relations between the Hudson's Bay Company and the Gwich'in reveals a model of resistance. Keywords: Indian-white relations, credit, fur trade, Gwich'in, sub- Arctic history INTRODUCTION:AN ECONOMIC FRONTIER Thenorthern fur trade and the resulting waves of white settlers brought devastating changes to indigenous cultures: disease, reliance on goods such as metal pots and rifles, and forms of exploitation. Many indigenous hunters and trappers became enmeshed in a capitalist model, and subsequently, were coerced into exploiting the world around them. Natural resources that were exploited were fur bearing animals and timber cut to supportthegrowingpopulation.However,aswillbe demonstrated, resistance to the presence of the settlers, and the modelsofexploitationtheyenforced,didexist.More importantly, both sides had to accommodate one another.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Cultural Overview of the Yukon Flats Region Prepared By: Kevin Bailey, USFWS Archaeologist Date: 2/12/2015 In
    Environmental and Cultural Overview of the Yukon Flats Region Prepared by: Kevin Bailey, USFWS Archaeologist Date: 2/12/2015 Introduction With a substantial population of Native people residing in their traditional homeland and living a modern traditional lifestyle, the Yukon Flats Refuge and all of the Alaskan Interior is a dynamic and living cultural landscape. The land, people, and wildlife form a tight, interrelated web of relationships extending thousands of years into the past. Natural features and human created “sites” form a landscape of meaning to the modern residents. The places and their meanings are highly relevant to modern residents, not just for people and culture but for the land. To many Gwich’in people culture is not distinct from their homeland. Although only minimally discussed in this overview, this dynamic living cultural landscape should be considered and discussed when writing about this area. Environmental Setting Containing the largest interior basin in Alaska, the Yukon Flats Refuge encompasses over 11 million acres of land in east central Alaska. Extending roughly 220 miles east-west along the Arctic Circle, the refuge lies between the Brooks Range to the north, and the White-Crazy Mountains to the south. The pipeline corridor runs along the refuge’s western boundary while the eastern boundary extends within 30 miles of the Canadian border. The Yukon River bisects the refuge, creating the dominant terrain. As many as 40,000 lakes, ponds, and streams may occur on the refuge, most concentrated in the flood plain along the Yukon and other rivers. Upland terrain, where lakes are less abundant, is the source of important drainage systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Water-Quality Data from Lakes in the Yukon Flats, Alaska, 2010–2011
    Water-Quality Data from Lakes in the Yukon Flats, Alaska, 2010–2011 Open-File Report 2014–1181 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Water-Quality Data from Lakes in the Yukon Flats, Alaska, 2010–2011 By Douglas R. Halm and Brad Griffith Open-File Report 2014–1181 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Sally Jewell, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2014 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS (1–888–275–8747) For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Halm, D.R., and Griffith, Brad, 2014, Water-quality data from lakes in the Yukon Flats, Alaska, 2010– 2011: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2014–1181, 6 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20141181. ISSN 2331-1258 (online) Cover photo: Yukon Flats looking northeast near Fort Yukon, Alaska.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Background and Setting
    Interior Alaska Transportation Plan November 2010 2 Background and Setting 2.1 Regional Setting The Interior Alaska planning area encompasses approximately 132,200 square miles or 20 percent of the state. If the Interior Alaska planning area were a state, it would rank as the fifth largest state in the Union falling between New Mexico and Montana in size. It contains one State forest, 15 State recreation areas, three national parks/preserves and three national wildlife refuges. Two highway international border crossings as well as 54 percent of Alaska’s National Highway System roads are within the study area. The study area includes all of the Fairbanks North Star Borough, and portions of the Matanuska-Susitna (Mat-Su) Borough and Denali Borough; however, 83 percent of the study area is outside an organized borough. The study area is made up of 41% federal land, including Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service, and National Park Service land; and 38% state land, including state-owned and state- selected land1. Nearly all the remaining land is Native owned, with less than 1 percent held by private individuals. Figure 1 shows land ownership distribution for the study area. 2.2 Communities There are approximately 50 communities in the study area that range in population from fewer than a dozen to over 31,000 (Fairbanks). All but twelve of the communities in the study area have access to the contiguous highway system. Three of the communities are governed as Home Rule Cities (Fairbanks, Nenana, and North Pole), four are second class cities (Anderson, Eagle, Fort Yukon, and Delta Jct.), and one is a first class city (Tanana).
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution . Movement Patterns of Caribou in Alaska
    The Distribution . Movement Patterns of Caribou in Alaska by James E. Hemming SK 367 .G35 no.1 - •••••••••• ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME Wildlife Technical Bulletin 1 \ mE DISTRIBUTION AND MOVEMENT PATTERNS OF CARIBOU IN ALASKA James E. Hemming State of Alaska William A. Egan Governor Department of Fish and Game Wallace H.Noerenberg Commissioner Division of Game Frank Jones Acting Director Alaska Department of Fish and Game Game Technical Bulletin No. 1 July 1971 Financed through Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Project W-17-R ARLIS Alaska Resources Ubrary & Information Services Library Building, Suite 111 3211 ProviDence Drive Anchorage, AK 99508-4614 To the memory of a very special group of biologists-those who have given their lives in unselfish devotion to Alaska's wildlife resources. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am indebted to Robert A. Rausch for his continuing assistance and encouragement during the course of this study. This report would not have been possible without the extensive work of Leland P. Glenn, Jack W. Lentfer, Terry A. McGowan and Ronald O.c Skoog, all of whom preceded me as leaders of the caribou project. I am also grateful to those who pioneered caribou movement studies before Alaska became a state, Edward F. Chatelain, Sigurd T. Olson, Ronald O. Skoog and Robert F. Scott. Robert E. LeResche read the manuscript and made helpful suggestions for its improvement. Of the many staff members who have contributed to this study I wish to thank especially Richard H. Bishop, Charles Lucier, Kenneth A. Neiland, Robert E. Pegau and Jerome Sexton. I should like to express my gratitude to the U.
    [Show full text]
  • The Alaska Vegetation Classification
    The Alaska Vegetation Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station General Technical Classification Report PNW-GTR-286 July 1992 L.A. Viereck, CT. Dyrness, A.R. Batten, and K.J. Wenzlick Authors L.A. VIERECK is a principal plant ecologist, C.T. DYRNESS was a research soil scientist (now retired), and K.J. WENZLICK was a secretary (currently is an editorial assistant, Research information Services, Portland, Oregon 97208), ‘Institute of Northern Forestry, 308 Tanana Drive, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775-5500; and A.R. BATTEN is research associate at University of Alaska Museum, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775-l200. Abstract Viereck, L.A.; Dyrness, C.T.; Batten, A.R.; Wenzlick, K.J. 1992. The Alaska vegetation classification. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-286. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 278 p. The Alaska vegetation classification presented here is a comprehensive, statewide system that has been under development since 1976. The classification is based, as much as possible, on the characteristics of the vegetation itself and is designed to categorize existing vegetation, not potential vegetation. A hierarchical system with five levels of resolution is used for classifying Alaska vegetation. The system, an agglomerative one, starts with 888 known Alaska plant communities, which are listed and referenced. At the broadest level of resolution, the system contains three formations-forest, scrub, and herbaceous vegetation. In addition to the classification, this report contains a key to levels I, II, and III; complete descriptions of all level IV units; and a glossary of terms used. Keywords: Vegetation, classification, Alaska, tundra, boreal forest, coastal forest, plant communities.
    [Show full text]
  • THE YUKON: Lauren Alexandra Baranik, B.A., a Thesis Submitted In
    Indigenous-crown relations in Canada and the Yukon: the Peel Watershed case, 2017 Item Type Thesis Authors Baranik, Lauren Alexandra Download date 03/10/2021 22:59:54 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/10609 INDIGENOUS-CROWN RELATIONS IN CANADA AND THE YUKON: THE PEEL WATERSHED CASE, 2017 By: Lauren Alexandra Baranik, B.A., B.Ed. A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Arctic and Northern Studies University of Alaska Fairbanks August 2019 APPROVED: Mary F. Ehrlander, Committee Chair Leslie McCartney, Committee Member Victoria Castillo, Committee Member Alexander Hirsch, Committee Member Mary F. Ehrlander, Chair Department of Arctic and Northern Studies Todd Sherman, Dean College of Liberal Arts Michael Castellini, Dean of the Graduate School ABSTRACT The history of Indigenous-Crown relations in Canada has varied regionally and temporally. With the Constitution Act of 1982, however, Canada entered a new era. Section 35 of the Constitution recognized Indigenous treaty and land rights, and the Supreme Court of Canada has consistently interpreted this section liberally in favor of Canada's Indigenous Peoples. The Court has upheld the honour of the Crown in emphasizing the national and sub­ national governments' duty to consult diligently when engaging in development on the traditional territories of First Nations, Metis, and Inuit. The “citizens-plus” model of asserting and protecting Indigenous rights, first coined in the Hawthorn Report of 1966, has proved effective in these court cases, most recently in the Yukon's Peel Watershed case from 2014 to 2017. Yet, engaging with the state to pursue and to invoke treaty rights has forced socio­ economic and political changes among Yukon First Nations that some scholars have argued are harmful to the spiritual and physical wellbeing of Indigenous communities, mainly through alienation from their homelands.
    [Show full text]