DOCSLIB.ORG

Gábor Zólyomi Copular Clauses and Focus Marking in Sumerian Sales Series De Gruyter Studium

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gábor Zólyomi Copular Clauses and Focus Marking in Sumerian Sales Series De Gruyter Studium Gábor Zólyomi Copular Clauses and Focus Marking in Sumerian sales series_De Gruyter Studium Gábor Zólyomi Copular Clauses and Focus Marking in Sumerian Managing Editor: Katarzyna Grzegorek Associate Editor: Anna Borowska Language Editor: Allison Kirk Published by De Gruyter Open Ltd, Warsaw/Berlin This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 license, which means that the text may be used for non-commercial purposes, provided credit is given to the author. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/. Copyright © 2014 Gábor Zólyomi ISBN: 978-3-11-040169-1 e-ISBN: 978-3-11-040170-7 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. Managing Editor: Katarzyna Grzegorek Associate Editor: Anna Borowska Language Editor: Allison Kirk www.degruyteropen.com Cover illustration: © Thinkstock, Clay bricks carrying the inscriptions of E-ana-tum, ruler of Lagash in the 24th c. BC. To Joachim Krecher, my teacher, colleague, and friend, who has taught me the value of disagreeing. Contents Introduction 1 1 Sumerian in a Nutshell 4 1.1 Introduction 4 1.2 The Sumerian Nominal and Verbal Template 7 2 Non-verbal Predicates in Sumerian 17 2.1 Introduction 17 2.2 Copular Clauses: the Most Important Characteristics 17 2.3 Copula Dropping: Non-verbal Predicates without a Copula 22 3 A Typology of Sumerian Copular Clauses 27 3.1 Introduction 27 3.2 The Classification of Copular Clauses in Linguistics 27 3.3 Copular Clauses in Sumerian 30 3.4 The Typology of Copular Clauses in Practice 52 3.5 Summary and Conclusions 54 4 Attributive Copular Biclausal Constructions 56 4.1 Introduction 56 4.2 Attributive CBCs and the Paratactic Relativization Strategy 57 4.3 Attributive CBCs and Appositions 69 4.4 Attributive CBCs in Which the CC Functions as Reason or Concessive Clause 81 4.5 Attributive CBCs Containing CCs with Left-dislocated Possessors 88 4.6 The Copula Functioning as Standard Marker 94 5 Specificational Copular Biclausal Constructions 101 5.1 Introduction 101 5.2 The Origin of the Sumerian Cleft Construction 102 5.3 Copula or Focus Marker? 112 6 Subordinate Clauses Followed by a Copula 152 6.1 Introduction 152 6.2 Thetic Sentences in Sumerian 154 6.3 Sentences with Polarity Focus 169 6.4 Summary and Conclusions 181 7 Summary and Outlook 182 References 186 Index of Quoted Texts 193 Index of Subjects 198 Abbreviations in the morphological glossings ~pl reduplication expressing verbal plurality ~pf reduplication expressing present-future tense 1sg first person singular 2sg second person singular 3nh third person non-human 3pl third person plural human 3sg third person singular human a agent (subject of a transitive verb) abl ablative case-marker or prefix abs absolutive case-marker acc accusative case-marker adv adverbiative anc anchor ant prefix of anteriority app appositive com comitative case-marker or prefix coor coordinator prefix cop copula cvn compound verb nominal element dat dative case-marker or prefix dem demonstrative pronoun DN divine name erg ergative case-marker fin finite-marker prefix gen genitive case-marker GN geographical name h human l1 locative1 case-marker or prefix l2 locative2 case-marker or prefix l3 locative3 case-marker or prefix l4 the archaic locative enclitic -/ne/ m masculine mid middle prefix mod modal prefix neg negative prefix nh non-human nom nominative p patient (object of a transitive verb) pf present-future, or the marker of the present-future pl plural pr pronoun PN personal name poss possessive enclitic pt preterit, or the marker of the preterit rdp reduplication s subject (subject of an intransitive verb) sub subordinator suffix stm standard marker syn syncopated form of a verbal prefix tl tenseless term terminative case-marker or prefix TN temple name ven ventive prefix Other abbreviations AAICAB 1/2 Grégoire (1996-200) Aleppo Touzalin (1982) AO Museum siglum of the Louvre, Paris (Antiquités orientales) AOAT Alter Orient und Altest Testament (series) AoF Altorientalische Forschungen (journal) ARET Archivi reali di Ebla. Testi (series) Ashm. Museum siglum of the Ashmolean Museum, Oxford ASJ Acta Sumerologica (journal) AuOr Aula Orientalis (journal) BM Museum siglum of the British Museum, London BPOA Biblioteca del Proximo Oriente Antiguo (series) CBS Museum siglum of the University Museum, Philadelphia (Catalogue of the Babylonian Section) CC copular clause CDLI Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative (http://cdli.ucla.edu) COP copula CT Cuneiform Texts from Babylonian Tablets in the British Museum (series) CTNMC Jacobsen (1939) CUSAS Cornell University Studies in Assyriology and Sumerology (series) Cyl. Cylinder DP Allotte de la Fuÿe (1908-1920) ETCSL Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature (http://etcsl.orinst.ox. ac.uk) ETCSRI Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Royal Inscriptions (http://oracc. museum.upenn.edu/etcsri) FaoS Freiburger altorientalische Studien (series) Fs. Kienast Selz (2003) Fs. Owen Kleinerman & Sasson (2010) Fs. Pettinato Waetzoldt (2004) Fs. Sigrist Michalowski (2008) HS Tablet siglum of the Hilprecht Collection, Jena IP interrogative pronoun ISET 1 Çiğ & Kızılyay & Kramer (1969) JNES Journal of Near Eastern Studies (journal) LEM Michalowski (1993) MSL Materialien zum sumerischen Lexikon / Materials for the Sumerian Lexicon (series) MVN Materiali per il vocabulario neosumerico (series) NATN Owen (1982) NBGT Neo-Babylonian Grammatical Texts NG Falkeinstein (1956b) Ni Museum siglum of the Archaeological Museum, Istanbul (Nippur) NRVN 1 Çiğ & Kızılyay (1965) OB Old Babylonian Ontario 2 Sigrist (1995) OSP 2 Westenholz (1987) PC predicate complement RIME 1 Frayne (2007) RIME 2 Frayne (1993) RIME 3/1 Edzard (1997) RIME 3/2 Frayne (1997) RTC Thureau-Dangin (1903) SAT Sumerian Archival Texts (series) SNAT Gomi & Sato (1990) SRU Edzard (1968) TCS 1 Sollberger (1966) TRU Legrain (1912) UET Ur Excavations, Texts (series) VS Vorderasiatische Schriftdenkmäler der (Königlichen) Museen zu Berlin (series) ZA Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und Vorderasiatische Archäologie (journal) Acknowledgments The largest part of this work was written while I was the holder of a János Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences between 2008 and 2011. I had, however, started the systematic collection of linguistic evidence on the Sume- rian copula within the framework of a 12 month long Return Fellowship of the Alex- ander von Humboldt-Foundation starting in September 2004. I thank Walther Salla- berger for his support in my application for this fellowship. The study of copular clauses in Sumerian royal inscriptions, an essential corpus for any work on Sumerian grammar, was part of the Electronic Text Corpus of Sumer- ian Royals Inscriptions project. This project was funded by the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA) between 2008.10.01–2013.06.30 (project no. K75104). The last chapters of this work were finished while I was the holder of a senior fel- lowship at the Central European University’s Institute of Advanced Studies between October 2012 and June 2013. The reader will notice that my work takes issue with Bram Jagersma’s recent description of Sumerian (2010) on a number of points. This happens because Jag- ersma’s work is the only modern descriptive grammar of Sumerian that discusses the copular clauses of Sumerian in depth. I am most grateful to Bram as his grammar provides a solid basis from which any question of Sumerian grammar can now be dis- cussed in a serious way, and it has also taken the burden off me to explain everything about copular clauses from scratch. Knowing him, I am sure that he will not mind my disagreements. I thank Katalin É. Kiss and Márta Peredy for their valuable comments on my ideas about the Sumerian copular clause. I am grateful for Szilvia Jáka-Sövegjártó who read several parts and versions of this work and kindly helped me in accessing linguistic and assyriological literature not available in Hungary. I would like to thank to Fru- zsina Csorba whose BA thesis helped me a lot to understand how constituent ques- tions in Sumerian work. I am most grateful to László Török, my colleague and friend, whose unwavering faith in me was a driving force to bring this work to completion. I am thankful for the support of my family, especially of my wife Ildikó, whose life has been influenced so much in the last five years by my obsession with the Sumerian copula. Introduction This work has grown out of my interest in understanding certain Sumerian sentences in which the copula appeared to function as a focus marker (see Chapter 5 below). The phenomenon of a focus marker being cognate with a copula is cross-linguistically well-attested, and the source of such markers is frequently a cleft-like construction.1 It seemed therefore an interesting question as to whether a similar development could also be reconstructed for Sumerian. My initial research focused on two areas of Sumerian grammar, neither of which had previously been the subject of systematic investigation: the typology of copular clauses in terms of their semantic types and information structure (see now Chapter 3 below); and the function of certain copular clauses which occurred as parts of biclausal constructions (see Chapters 4 and 5 below). After a while it became clear that my research on copular clauses may lead much further than anticipated: the analysis of copular clauses together with that of biclausal constructions can provide a key to understanding how identificational focus was marked in Sumerian. Almost nothing was previously known about this area of Sumerian grammar.2 One would look in vain for a section on information structure in Sumerian in the exist- ing grammars of the language (e.g., Thomsen 1984; Edzard 2003). The only exception is Jagersma’s grammar, which offers a short subsection on “The copula in highlighting constructions” (2010, pp.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A PRELIMINARY STUDY of the SUMERIAN CURRICULAR and LAMENTATIONAL TEXTS from the OLD BABYLONIAN CITY of KISH by Joshua A. Bowen A
    A PRELIMINARY STUDY OF THE SUMERIAN CURRICULAR AND LAMENTATIONAL TEXTS FROM THE OLD BABYLONIAN CITY OF KISH by Joshua A. Bowen A dissertation submitted to the Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland February, 2017 © 2017 Joshua A. Bowen All Rights Reserved Abstract The collections of Sumerian and Akkadian tablets that have been excavated at various Old Babylonian sites have been surveyed and subjected to corpus-based analysis, including the tablets from prominent cities such as Nippur, Ur, Sippar, Isin, and Uruk. However, until very recently, attention has not focused on the important northern city of Kiš. Although many of the literary and liturgical duplicates from Kiš have been translated and discussed, neither the curricular nor the lamentational corpora have been treated as a whole. The goal of my dissertation, therefore, is to survey and analyze the entirety of the Old Babylonian (ca. 2000-1600 BCE) curricular and lamentational textual material from Kiš in order to identify local features or traditions that were unique to these genres. The survey of the curricular textual material will seek to accomplish two goals. First, it will identify the curricular compositions that were used in scribal education at Kiš during the OB period. Second, it will determine the ways in which the Kiš scribal curriculum deviated from the curricula that are known from other OB cites, such as Nippur, Ur, and Sippar. The latter investigation will reveal two patterns at Kiš. First, it will demonstrate that, although several curricular duplicates varied from manuscripts found at the major scribal center, Nippur, there is evidence to suggest that there were lines of textual transmission that connected the OB Kiš lexical tradition to those that were found in the MB and the first millennium.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Middle Assyrian Sumerian Literary, Liturgical and Magical Texts
    The Reception of Sumerian Literature in the Western Periphery Maurizio Viano 2 Middle Assyrian Sumerian Literary, Liturgical and Magical Texts The city of Assur, the capital of the Assyrian kingdom during the Late Bronze Age, is the main source for the Middle Assyrian Sumerian literary texts. They belong to a group of Middle Assyrian tablets discovered in Neo Assyrian archeological contexts in different find-spots from two main areas in the northern part of the city.496 About one hundred MA tablets were unearthed together with NA manuscripts in the southwest courtyard of the Assur Temple (N1).497 An additional sixty tablets were found in an earlier NA archeological context in the area southwest of the Anu-Adad Temple (M2).498 To this group probably belong five more tablets without correct excavation numbers, three of which are bilingual.499 However, many Sumerian literary texts from Assur have unrecorded or unknown find-spots or their archival context cannot be reconstructed.500 In addition to literary texts, the col- lection includes palace and harem regulations, royal inscriptions, omina, lexical lists, astronomical and astrological texts, and several other typologies.501 According to Weidner (1952-53) this collec- tion, consisting of Assyrian manuscripts and tablets imported from Babylonia, once belonged to a single library assembled by the king Tiglath-Pileser I (1114-1076 B.C.). This view was questioned by Lambert502 who suggested that scribes wrote tablets for their own libraries. Now it is generally agreed upon that this collection stems from the reign of various kings. A large part of it, including several Sumerian literary texts, is the work of the sons of the royal scribe Ninurta-uballissu.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquarian Mythology
    Aquarian Mythology A Comparative Study By John Kirk Robertson, DD Baltimore, USA 1975 ISBN 0-9543605-3-2 “Copyright: extends only as far as acknowledging the author in any reproduction of the text. Text should only be reproduced for teaching purposes or personal study and not for gain.” [NOTE: With the acknowledgement that John K. Robertson wrote the material I culled below, I present for personal study and non-profit purposes John’s interesting material. Note that the images in the original text did not transfer. Only the written text survives here…. [Bill Wrobel] PREFACE The myth has come to mean that which is "fanciful, absurd and unhistorical". Yet myths are "all grave records of ancient religious customs and events, and reliable enough as history once their language is understood and allowance has been made for errors in transcription, misunderstandings of obsolete ritual, and deliberate changes introduced for moral or political reasons." (Graves, Robert. The White Goddess. London, Faber, 1948.) The religious myths of humanity contain repeated well defined symbols such as the Great Mother and the Lame Smith. When these symbols are fitted to the precise order of the signs of the zodiac this gives the cosmological key to the mysteries of the universe or macrocosm and the human body which is the microcosm. 1 Man, as a spiritual being, is a direct recipient of the energies of the universe, which flow in through his psychic centres or chakras along the spine. Mythology gives information on esoteric psychology which goes far beyond twentieth century concepts of the nature of man.
    [Show full text]
  • Assyrian and Babylonian Scholarly Text Catalogues Die Babylonisch-Assyrische Medizin in Texten Und Untersuchungen
    Assyrian and Babylonian Scholarly Text Catalogues Die babylonisch-assyrische Medizin in Texten und Untersuchungen Begründet von Franz Köcher Herausgegeben von Robert D. Biggs und Marten Stol Band 9 Assyrian and Babylonian Scholarly Text Catalogues Medicine, Magic and Divination Edited by Ulrike Steinert The work on this volume as part of the project BabMed – Babylonian Medicine has been funded by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013; Project No. 323596). ISBN 978-1-5015-1363-3 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-1-5015-0491-4 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-1-5015-0487-7 Library of Congress Control Number 2018935702 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2018 Walter de Gruyter Inc., Boston/Berlin Cover image: Florentina Badalanova Geller Typesetting: Michael Peschke, Berlin Printing: CPI books GmbH, Leck www.degruyter.com Table of Contents Acknowledgements 1 Abbreviations 3 Ulrike Steinert Introduction: Catalogues, Corpora and Canons in Mesopotamian Scholarship 7 Part 1: Studies on Mesopotamian Text Catalogues Irving L. Finkel On Three Tablet Inventories 25 Markham J. Geller A Babylonian Hippocrates 42 J. Cale Johnson Towards a New Perspective on Babylonian Medicine: The Continuum of Allegoresis and the Emergence of Secular Models in Mesopotamian Scientific Thought 55 Strahil V. Panayotov Notes on the Assur Medical Catalogue with Comparison to the Nineveh Medical Encyclopaedia 89 Francesca Rochberg The Catalogues of Enūma Anu Enlil 121 Eric Schmidtchen Esagil-kīn-apli’s Catalogue of Sakikkû and Alamdimmû 137 Ulrike Steinert Catalogues, Texts and Specialists: Some Thoughts on the Assur Medical Catalogue, Mesopotamian Medical Texts and Healing Professions 158 vi Table of Contents Part 2: Text Sources U.
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Passages Cited
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-48178-6 — Achilles beside Gilgamesh Michael Clarke Index More Information Index of Passages Cited Adapa and the South Wind Odes 13.111–12: 198 fr. A 2–4: 107 Beowulf fr. B 83: 107 2802 ff.: 10 fr. D 5: 107 Aeschylus Death of Gilgamesh Agamemnon 176–178: 212 M1–6: 57 Agamemnon 445–451: 203 M72–7: 101 Agamemnon 600–602: 202 M76–9: 49 Carians/Europa fr. 100: 149 M 120–3: 50 Myrmidons fr. 136: 216 M 166–9: 49 Persians 818–822: 197 M 298–304: 50 Ransoming of Hector fr. 266: 294 N1v13–15: 49 Suppliants 1: 170 Dumuzid’s Dream Suppliants 26: 170 1 ff.: 92 Suppliants 86–103: 170 Xantriai fr. 169: 283 Elegy on the Death of a Woman (Livingstone fr. 350.1–9: 180 1989) Alcaeus r 4: 105 fr. 44.8: 125, 198 Enmerkar and Ensuhgirana fr. 359: 241 29–32, 60–3: 43 Apollodorus Enuma Elish Epitome 3.1.2: 157 I 45: 79 Library 3.6.8: 189 I48–50: 161 Archilochus Epic Cycle fr. 196a.39–41: 25 Cypria fr. 1: 160, 174 Aristotle Cypria fr. 1.7: 166, 200 Eudemian Ethics 1233b22-6: 164 Cypria fr. 10.1–11: 163 Politics 1253a28-9: 267 Cypria fr. 19: 181 Posterior Analytics 97b 16–25: 311 Little Iliad fr. 2: 309 Rhetoric 1837a9: 164 Thebaid fr. 9: 189 Assyrian and Babylonian letters (Parpola 1993) Epic of Gilgamesh p. 288, no. 352: 83 MB Bog 1 fr. (f): 78 Atrahasis MB Ug 1 12–13: 65 LBV VI 6’–13’:30 MB Ug 2 13’:68 OBV I11–16: 28 OB II 154–63: 65 OBV I 174–197: 51 OB II 194: 84 OBV I 353–359: 52 OB III 140–1: 69 OBV III iv 6–11: 53 OB III 148: 5, 262 OBV III v 35: 53 OB III 184–8: 68 OBV III vi 2–3: 53 OB IM 28: 72 OBV III vii 4–5: 53
    [Show full text]
  • The Assyrian Tree of Life: Tracing the Origins of Jewish Monotheism and Greek Philosophy Author(S): Simo Parpola Source: Journal of Near Eastern Studies, Vol
    The Assyrian Tree of Life: Tracing the Origins of Jewish Monotheism and Greek Philosophy Author(s): Simo Parpola Source: Journal of Near Eastern Studies, Vol. 52, No. 3 (Jul., 1993), pp. 161-208 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/545436 Accessed: 06/05/2010 14:25 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=ucpress. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Near Eastern Studies. http://www.jstor.org THE ASSYRIAN TREE OF LIFE: TRACING THE ORIGINS OF JEWISH MONOTHEISM AND GREEK PHILOSOPHY* SIMO PARPOLA, University of Helsinki I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Buried Foundation of the Gilgamesh Epic
    The Buried Foundation of the Gilgamesh Epic Press SBL Cuneiform Monographs Edited by T. Abusch — M. J. Geller S. M. Maul — F. A. M. Wiggermann Press Volume 39 SBL The Buried Foundation of the Gilgamesh Epic The Akkadian Huwawa Narrative Daniel E. Fleming Sara J. Milstein Press SBL Press SBLAtlanta Copyright © 2010 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands This edition published under license from Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands by SBL Press All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or trans- mitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, includ- ing photocopying and recording, or by any means of any information storage or retrieval system, except as may be expressly permitted by the 1976 Copyright Act or in writing from the Publisher. Requests for per- mission should be addressed in writing to the Rights and Permissions Department, Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is grant- ed by Brill provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. Fees are subject to change. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Fleming, Daniel E. author. The buried foundation of the Gilgamesh Epic : the Akkadian Huwawa narra- tive by / Daniel E. Fleming and Sara J. Milstein. pages cm. — (Cuneiform monographs; Volume 39) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-62837-032-4 (paper binding : alk. paper) 1. Gilgamesh. 2. Epic poetry, Assyro-Babylonian—History and criticism. 3. Assyriology—History. I. Milstein, Sara J.
    [Show full text]
  • Lloyd E. Cotsen Cuneiform Tablets Collection LSC.1883
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt0t1nf169 Online items available Finding Aid for the Lloyd E. Cotsen Cuneiform Tablets Collection LSC.1883 Finding aid prepared by Sara Brumfield, 2011 UCLA Library Special Collections Online finding aid last updated 2020 August 18. Room A1713, Charles E. Young Research Library Box 951575 Los Angeles, CA 90095-1575 [email protected] URL: https://www.library.ucla.edu/special-collections Finding Aid for the Lloyd E. LSC.1883 1 Cotsen Cuneiform Tablets Collection LSC.1883 Contributing Institution: UCLA Library Special Collections Title: Lloyd E. Cotsen cuneiform tablets collection source: Cotsen, Lloyd E. Identifier/Call Number: LSC.1883 Physical Description: 20.6 Linear Feet(206 custom boxes) Date (inclusive): circa 3200-1500 BCE Abstract: The collection consists of 215 cuneiform tablets, the majority of which were written by students in ancient Mesopotamian schools. Tablet subjects include writing composition and language, mathematics, science, law, and religion. The chronological range of the tablets extends from the Uruk Period (c. 3200 BCE) to the Old Babylonian period (c. 1800-1600 BCE). Held at UCLA Library Special Collections. Advance notice is required for access to the collection. In order to access this collection, users must email [email protected] in order to schedule a viewing. Language of Material: Materials are primarily in Sumerian and Akkadian. Some materials in West Semitic. Conditions Governing Access COLLECTION STORED ON-SITE : Open for research. In order to access this collection, users must email [email protected] in order to schedule a viewing. Conditions Governing Reproduction and Use Property rights to the physical object belong to the UC Regents.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 Sumerian Literary and Magical Texts from Emar
    The Reception of Sumerian Literature in the Western Periphery Maurizio Viano 6 Sumerian Literary and Magical Texts from Emar Texts from Emar will be presented according to their scribal tradition, Syrian and Syro-Hittite. Texts with duplicates from Emar and Ugarit will be treated in the present chapter as the Emar sources are usually better preserved. 6.1 Syrian School Texts The only known Sumerian literary text written in Syrian school style is E 775, A Prayer for a King. The rest of the Syrian school documentation consists of lexical lists, omina and incantations.1472 6.1.1 A Prayer for a King – E 775 - RS 79.25 The composition A Prayer for a King (PfK) is a prayer to the god Enlil on behalf of an unnamed king. This text is unknown from the Old Babylonian literature and is only attested in a bilingual recension preserved on two tablets from Emar and Ugarit. E 775 is a single-column tablet from Emar containing a bilingual version of the text in interlinear format. RS 79.25 is the left edge of a tablet discovered at Ugarit in Maison A containing the phonetic Sumerian version of the text.1473 A parallel column likely containing the Akkadian translation was arranged to the right of the Sumerian version as shown by double vertical rulings on line 11 of the obverse.1474 An additional Akkadian version is attested at Ugarit on a small fragment, RS 79.25C,1475 which, according to Arnaud,1476 does not belong to the same tablet as RS 79.25 on the basis of clay and sign shapes.
    [Show full text]
  • Enheduana and the Invention of Authorship
    1 Enheduana and the Invention of Authorship SOPHUS HELLE Abstract: The first known author, Enheduana, gained a central place in the literary culture of ancient Iraq long after the death of Sumerian, the language in which her poems were written. The essay argues that her authorship served to depict the Sumerian literary heritage as a tangible object that could be acquired by people who did not speak Sumerian as their native language, since Enheduana’s poems condensed a cacophony of independent traditions into a single entity. The process primarily took place in the city of Nippur in the troubled decades after 1740 BC, as the ancient scholars desperately needed to assert their importance. They did so by claiming special access to Sumerian literature, and authorship served as an ideal vehicle to represent that literature and that access. In short, Enheduana became a body and a bridge for Sumerian literature, condensing it into a single object and allowing it to move into a new cultural context. Contributor biography: Sophus Helle is a doctoral student in Comparative Literature and Assyriology at Aarhus University, Denmark. His PhD project examines the first appearance of literary authorship, in the cuneiform cultures of ancient Iraq. He has also worked on Babylonian and Assyrian literature more broadly, focusing on ancient poetics, gender and sexuality, the genre of epics, narrative structures, and the modern reception of ancient literature. 1 Introduction Literature begins in complete anonymity. The oldest known literary texts are entirely anonymous. For more than a millennium after the invention of writing, c. 3500 BC, literature would be composed, copied, and circulated without authorial attributions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Noetic Paschal Anthropos: Genesis 1:27 and the Theology of the Divine Image in Early Paschal Literature
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations (2009 -) Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Projects The oN etic Paschal Anthropos: Genesis 1:27 and the Theology of the Divine Image in Early Paschal Literature Dragos Andrei Giulea Marquette University Recommended Citation Giulea, Dragos Andrei, "The oeN tic Paschal Anthropos: Genesis 1:27 and the Theology of the Divine Image in Early Paschal Literature" (2010). Dissertations (2009 -). Paper 52. http://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/52 THE NOETIC PASCHAL ANTHROPOS: GENESIS 1:27 AND THE THEOLOGY OF THE DIVINE IMAGE IN EARLY PASCHAL LITERATURE by Dragoş A. Giulea A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Milwaukee, Wisconsin May 2010 ABSTRACT THE NOETIC PASCHAL ANTHROPOS: GENESIS 1:27 AND THE THEOLOGY OF THE DIVINE IMAGE IN EARLY PASCHAL LITERATURE Dragoş A. Giulea Milwaukee, Wisconsin This study examines the theme of the heavenly Anthropos in the earliest extant paschal writings: Melito’s Peri Pascha, Origen’s Peri Pascha, and Pseudo-Hippolytus’s In sanctum Pascha. Instead of analyzing these materials through the prism of such classical images as sacrifice and divine Lamb, the study investigates them through the perspective of the categories of heavenly Man and divine Image. The particular method of the study will be tradition criticism and will envision the paschal tradition of the heavenly luminous Anthropos as a development of the theophanic traditions of the Jewish Second Temple. Echoing such ancient passages as Genesis 1:27, Ezekiel 1:26, and their reception history in Philo of Alexandria and Paul the Apostle, these paschal materials articulate a theology of the heavenly Anthropos that can be typified through the categories of eikonic soteriology and noetic and mystery dimensions.
    [Show full text]
  • Demons and Monsters in the Mesopotamian Textual and Artistic Tradition
    They are Seven: Demons and Monsters in the Mesopotamian Textual and Artistic Tradition by Gina V. Konstantopoulos A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Near Eastern Studies) in the University of Michigan 2015 Doctoral Committee: Professor Piotr A. Michalowski, Chair Professor Gary M. Beckman Associate Professor Ian S. Moyer Associate Professor Ellen Muehlberger Professor Daniel Schwemer, Julius Maximilians Universität Würzburg © Gina V. Konstantopoulos 2015 Acknowledgements I owe debts of gratitude (as well as the existence of this dissertation as anything resembling a complete – perhaps even coherent – form) to many different people. First and foremost, my thanks go to my dissertation committee. I am deeply grateful to have worked with Piotr Michalowski as my advisor from the beginning of my time at Michigan, and to have had the great privilege of so much time studying under his Sumerological wing. I am thankful to Gary Beckman for years of careful instruction and equally dedicated care to this dissertation. Ian Moyer agreed to join on as my cognate member and committed his careful attention to the project. Ellen Muehlberger tirelessly read drafts, fielded questions, and was endlessly patient with letting me know when I had gone too far afield or otherwise off-book. Daniel Schwemer kindly agreed to sign onto the committee while I was studying with him at Würzburg, and applied his meticulous attention to it. I was able to spend the 2012-2013 academic year at the University of Würzburg thanks to a fellowship from the Deutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst, and I could not have been more fortunate to spend my first full year of research and writing in such a supportive department.
    [Show full text]