The Postmodern Theatre Clown Ashley Tobias
The Postmodern Theatre Clown Ashley Tobias During the postmodern era the status of the clown underwent significant change as the figure shifted from social, artistic and academic marginality to centre-stage. Indeed, the clown became integrally enmeshed with the perceptions, attitudes and operations of the phenomenon known as postmodernism. Inexplicably, the clown type I term the “postmodern theatre clown” has been virtually overlooked by academic research.1 In this paper, I initially outline the fundamental approach to be followed when seeking to define the postmodern theatre clown. Subsequently, I demonstrate the approach by focusing on two outstanding exemplars of the type and illustrate by referring to specific scenes from their performances and texts. The term “clown,” when used generically, refers to a very extensive group of figures going back in time to the most primitive of tribal existence but equally at home in contemporary, technologically advanced societies. A fond figure of imaginative fiction, a pivotal participant in social ritual, or a very real person in the realm of historical fact, clowns reside in many worlds, often straddling the boundaries of fact, fiction, ritual, art and reality. This group is comprised of many and varied types known as: fool, court-jester, buffoon, theatre clown, mime-clown, silent film clown, alazon, eiron, bomolochos, commedia dell’arte clown, street clown, circus clown and ritual clown. In addition to these terms used to label the specific types, clowns are also referred to as: comedians, comics, drolls, farceurs, humorists, Harlequins, jokers, mimes, mummers, pranksters, tricksters, wags and wits. Often there is neither absolute consensus on the exact referents of the various neither terms nor full agreement on their precise usage.
[Show full text]