DOCSLIB.ORG

TOTAL STATE Dam Name NID ID Allocation ($) Assessment Planning

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TOTAL STATE Dam Name NID ID Allocation ($) Assessment Planning Detailed Summary Report 10/27/2014 TOTAL Project Phase STATE Dam Name NID ID Allocation ($) Assessment Planning Design Construction AL POWELL CREEK W/S DAM SITE 03 AL00131 X AL CROOKED CREEK W/S DAM SITE 16 AL00591 X AL CHOCCOLOCCO CREEK W/S DAM SITE 24 AL00614 X AL CHOCCOLOCCO CREEK W/S DAM SITE 07 AL00615 X AL CAHULGA CREEK W/S DAM SITE 1 AL00616 X AL CHOCCOLOCCO CREEK W/S DAM SITE 09 AL00909 X AL TALLASEEHATCHEE CREEK W/S DAM SITE 2 AL01512 X AL TALLASEEHATCHEE CREEK W/S DAM SITE 3 AL01513 X AL TALLASEEHATCHEE CREEK W/S DAM SITE 1 AL01515 X AL CHOCCOLOCCO CREEK W/S DAM SITE 06 AL01517 X AL MUSH CREEK W/S DAM SITE 2 AL02045 X AL TALLASEEHATCHEE CREEK W/S DAM SITE 4 AL02266 X AL BIG NANCE CREEK W/S DAM SITE 4 AL02318 X AL POWELL CREEK W/S DAM SITE 04A AL02361 X AL Total 280,000 14 0 0 0 AZ FLORENCE FRS AZ00027 X X AZ GRAVEYARD WASH FRS AZ00066 X AZ STOCKTON WASH FRS AZ00067 X AZ FRYE CREEK FRS #3 AZ00068 X AZ FREEMAN WASH FRS AZ00072 X AZ POWERLINE FRS (Apache Junction-Gilbert) AZ00082 X X AZ MAGMA FRS AZ00083 X AZ VINEYARD ROAD FRS (Williams-Chandler) AZ00084 X X AZ RITTENHOUSE FRS AZ00085 X AZ WHITE TANKS FRS #4 AZ00109 X X AZ FREDONIA FRS AZ00138 X X AZ BUCKEYE FRS NO 1 AZ00143 X X AZ Total 97,935,150 4 0 7 7 AR MUDDY FORK OF ILLINOIS RIVER SITE 1 AR00286 X AR EAST FORK POINT REMOVE CREEK SITE 5 AR00319 X AR MUD CREEK SITE 1 AR00367 X AR BIG CREEK SITE 3 AR00438 X AR BIG CREEK SITE 15 AR00439 X AR BIG CREEK SITE 4 AR00451 X AR BIG CREEK SITE 5 AR00452 X AR BIG CREEK SITE 9 AR00456 X AR BIG CREEK SITE 10 AR00457 X AR BIG CREEK SITE 18 AR00463 X AR BIG CREEK SITE 19 AR00464 X AR CEDAR PINEY SITE 1 AR00756 X AR POTEAU RIVER 7 AR00846 X AR POTEAU RIVER 1 AR00853 X AR POTEAU RIVER 15 AR00857 X AR SIX MILE CREEK SITE 8 AR00875 X AR SIX MILE CREEK SITE 3 AR00882 X AR SIX MILE CREEK SITE 6 AR00884 X AR SIX MILE CREEK SITE 11 AR00887 X AR SIX MILE CREEK SITE 12 AR00888 X AR SIX MILE CREEK SITE 10 AR00889 X AR SIX MILE CREEK SITE 9 AR00890 X AR SIX MILE CREEK SITE 7 AR00892 X AR POTEAU RIVER 13 AR01213 X AR POINSETT SITE 2 AR01278 X AR POINSETT SITE 3 AR01279 X AR POINSETT SITE 20 AR01282 X AR UPPER PETIT JEAN SITE 5 AR01421 X AR POINSETT SITE 11 AR01425 X AR POINSETT SITE 4 AR01431 X AR POINSETT SITE 12 AR01432 X AR POINSETT SITE 9 AR01434 X AR POINSETT SITE 113 AR01436 X AR POINSETT SITE 8 AR01455 X AR POINSETT SITE 121 AR01463 X TOTAL Project Phase STATE Dam Name NID ID Allocation ($) Assessment Planning Design Construction AR POINSETT SITE 118 AR01465 X AR POINSETT SITE 16 AR01498 X AR POINSETT SITE 14L AR01547 X AR POINSETT SITE 14R AR01548 X AR POINSETT SITE 15 AR01552 X AR Total 1,206,000 39 1 0 0 CO FRANKTOWN-PARKER FP-B-1 CO00273 X X X CO FRANKTOWN-PARKER FP-E-8 CO00280 X CO MUD GULCH DET MG-1 CO00469 X CO NORTH WALSENBURG FLOOD CONTROL DAM CO00511 X CO BOXELDER CREEK WS B-3 CO00512 X CO CROOKED ARROYO DET DAM CA-1 CO00519 X CO CROOKED ARROYO DET DAM CA-3 CO00520 X CO CROOKED ARROYO DET DAM CA-4 CO00521 X CO FISHER PEAK DET DAM FPC-1 CO00533 X CO FISHER PEAK DET DAM FPC-2 CO00534 X CO BOXELDER CREEK WS B-2 CO01406 X X X CO CROOKED ARROYO DET DAM CA-2 CO01837 X CO Total 3,135,300 9 3 2 2 CT Spaulding Pond Brook Site-1 CT00202 X CT Spaulding Pond Brook Site-2 CT00203 X CT Norwalk Site-7b CT00476 X CT Blackberry Site-15 CT00483 X CT Blackberry Site-5 CT00484 X CT Blackberry Site-6 CT00485 X CT Blackberry Site-9 CT00486 X CT S Br Park R Site-3 CT00487 X CT S Br Park R Site-4 CT00488 X CT S Br Park R Site-1 Main Dam CT00489 X CT S Br Park R Site-1 Diversion Dam CT00490 X CT S Br Park R Site-2 CT00491 X CT North Br Park R Site-3 CT00492 X CT North Br Park R Site-1 CT00494 X CT North Br Park R Site-9 CT00495 X CT North Br Park R Site-2 CT00496 X CT Farm Brook Site-2a CT01546 X CT Farm Brook Site-2b CT01547 X CT Avery Brook Site 1 CT05000 X CT Avery Brook Site 2 CT05001 X CT Norwalk Site-2 CT05002 X CT Furnace Br Mid R Site-3 CT00479 X CT Furnace Br Mid R Site-4 CT00480 X CT Furnace Br Mid R Site-5 CT00481 X CT Furnace Br Mid R Site-6 CT00482 X CT Total 930,000 24 1 0 0 GA Pumpkinvine Creek 1 GA00001 X GA Stamp-shoal Creeks 1 GA00032 X GA Mill-canton Creeks 8 GA00038 X GA Little River 22 GA00046 X GA Amicalola Creek 1 GA00145 X GA Rocky Comfort Creek 50 GA00368 X GA Beaverdam Creek 17 GA00414 X GA South River 51 GA00431 X GA South Fork Broad River 64 GA00434 X GA Little Sandy Trail Creek 2 GA00436 X GA North Fork Broad River 13 GA00484 X GA North Broad River 33 GA00506 X GA North Broad River 38 GA00508 X GA Sautee Creek 10 GA00529 X GA Etowah River 26 GA00545 X GA Settingdown Creek 56 GA00554 X GA Etowah River 1 GA00564 X GA Marbury Creek 24 GA00604 X GA Barber Creek 25 GA00605 X GA Cartecay River 10 GA00626 X TOTAL Project Phase STATE Dam Name NID ID Allocation ($) Assessment Planning Design Construction GA Ellijay River 12 GA00633 X GA Mountaintown Creek 1 GA00634 X GA Hightower Creek 13 GA00641 X GA Hazel Creek 21 GA00653 X GA Sharp Mountain 1 GA00690 X GA Talking Rock Creek 13 GA00703 X GA Mill Creek 9 GA00730 X GA Raccoon Creek 7 GA00777 X GA Sallacoa Creek 89 GA00803 X GA Sallacoa Creek 77 GA00804 X GA Sandy Creek 14 GA00969 X GA Potato Creek 115 GA01048 X GA Cane Creek 2 GA01097 X GA Bull Creek 1 GA01110 X GA Bull Creek 3 GA01111 X GA Bull Creek 4 GA01112 X GA Bull Creek 12 GA01113 X GA Bull Creek 14 GA01114 X GA Bull Creek 21 GA01115 X GA Bull Creek 24 GA01116 X GA Bull Creek 25 GA01117 X GA Bull Creek 26 GA01118 X GA Bull Creek 27 GA01119 X GA Bull Creek 28 GA01120 X GA Noonday Creek 9 GA01468 X GA Noonday Creek 15 GA01488 X GA Noonday Creek 4 GA01489 X GA Noonday Creek 16 GA01490 X GA Noonday Creek 17 GA01491 X GA Little River 25 GA01512 X GA Palmetto Creek 1 GA01646 X GA Little Sandy Trail Creek 14 GA01757 X GA Head Of Little Tennessee River 12 GA02070 X GA Long Swamp Creek 14 GA02139 X GA Head Of Chattooga River 1 GA02153 X GA Little Tallapoosa River 13 GA02159 X GA Lower Little Tallapoosa River 25 GA02164 X GA Pine Log Tributary 25 GA02186 X GA Yellowjacket Creek 15 GA02705 X GA Cedar Creek 9m GA04493 X GA Big Cedar Creek 32 GA04572 X GA Soque 44 GA04592 X GA Tesnatee Creek 11m GA04600 X GA Upper Mulberry River 7 GA83662 X GA Total 1,445,000 61 3 0 0 ID Cedar Creek Holding ID00187 X ID Total 20,000 1 0 0 0 IN ELK CR. NO. 7 IN00041 X IN ELK CR. NO. 1 IN00052 X IN BUSSERON CR. NO. L-1 IN00063 X IN FRENCH LICK CR. F-7 IN00076 X IN FRENCH LICK CR. F-3 IN00079 X IN LITTLE RACCOON NO. 3 IN00177 X IN UPPER BIG BLUE NO. 15 IN00179 X IN LITTLE RACCOON NO. 8 IN00186 X IN MIDDLE FORK NO. 7 IN00192 X IN LITTLE RACCOON NO. 2C IN00201 X IN LITTLE WALNUT NO. 3 IN00212 X IN LITTLE RACCOON NO. 7 IN00219 X IN LITTLE RACCOON NO. 1 IN00232 X IN LITTLE RACCOON NO. 21 IN00233 X IN TWIN-RUSH CR. NO. 3 IN00242 X IN LITTLE WALNUT NO. 4 IN00497 X IN LITTLE RACCOON NO. 2D IN00697 X IN Total 340,000 17 0 0 0 TOTAL Project Phase STATE Dam Name NID ID Allocation ($) Assessment Planning Design Construction KS LITTLE WALNUT HICKORY WS DAM 19 KS02100 X KS MUDDY CREEK WJD DAM 4-6 KS02126 X KS ROCK CREEK WJD28 DAM 02 KS02129 X KS UPPER WALNUT (NORTH SECTOR) FRD 6 KS05289 X KS UPPER WALNUT (NORTH SECTOR) FRD 21 KS05290 X KS Total 1,731,000 0 5 0 0 KY East Fork Clarks River FRS 32 KY00200 X KY Red Lick Creek FRS 12 KY00766 X KY Red Lick Creek MPS 1 KY00769 X KY Total 1,313,000 0 3 0 0 LA Pleasant Valley No. 5 LA00035 X LA Pleasant Valley No. 4 LA00036 X LA Pleasant Valley No. 3 LA00037 X LA Pleasant Valley No. 2 LA00038 X LA Pleasant Valley No. 1 LA00039 X LA Total 100,000 5 0 0 0 ME Bryant Pond ME00476 X ME Libby Brook Dam ME00493 X ME Violette Brook Dam ME00496 X ME Total 60,000 3 0 0 0 MD St.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cobb County, Georgia and Incorporated Areas
    VOLUME 1 OF 4 Cobb County COBB COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER ACWORTH, CITY OF 130053 AUSTELL, CITY OF 130054 COBB COUNTY 130052 (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) KENNESAW, CITY OF 130055 MARIETTA, CITY OF 130226 POWDER SPRINGS, CITY OF 130056 SMYRNA, CITY OF 130057 REVISED: MARCH 4, 2013 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 13067CV001D NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report may not contain all data available within the Community Map Repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. Therefore, users should consult with community officials and check the Community Map Repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. Initial Countywide FIS Effective Date: August 18, 1992 Revised Countywide FIS Effective Date: December 16, 2008 Revised Countywide FIS Effective Date: March 4, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Purpose of Study 1 1.2 Authority and Acknowledgments 1 1.3 Coordination 3 2.0 AREA STUDIED 5 2.1 Scope of Study 5 2.2 Community Description 10 2.3 Principal Flood Problems
    [Show full text]
  • List of TMDL Implementation Plans with Tmdls Organized by Basin
    Latest 305(b)/303(d) List of Streams List of Stream Reaches With TMDLs and TMDL Implementation Plans - Updated June 2011 Total Maximum Daily Loadings TMDL TMDL PLAN DELIST BASIN NAME HUC10 REACH NAME LOCATION VIOLATIONS TMDL YEAR TMDL PLAN YEAR YEAR Altamaha 0307010601 Bullard Creek ~0.25 mi u/s Altamaha Road to Altamaha River Bio(sediment) TMDL 2007 09/30/2009 Altamaha 0307010601 Cobb Creek Oconee Creek to Altamaha River DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010601 Cobb Creek Oconee Creek to Altamaha River FC 2012 Altamaha 0307010601 Milligan Creek Uvalda to Altamaha River DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 2006 Altamaha 0307010601 Milligan Creek Uvalda to Altamaha River FC TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010601 Oconee Creek Headwaters to Cobb Creek DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010601 Oconee Creek Headwaters to Cobb Creek FC TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010602 Ten Mile Creek Little Ten Mile Creek to Altamaha River Bio F 2012 Altamaha 0307010602 Ten Mile Creek Little Ten Mile Creek to Altamaha River DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010603 Beards Creek Spring Branch to Altamaha River Bio F 2012 Altamaha 0307010603 Five Mile Creek Headwaters to Altamaha River Bio(sediment) TMDL 2007 09/30/2009 Altamaha 0307010603 Goose Creek U/S Rd. S1922(Walton Griffis Rd.) to Little Goose Creek FC TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010603 Mushmelon Creek Headwaters to Delbos Bay Bio F 2012 Altamaha 0307010604 Altamaha River Confluence of Oconee and Ocmulgee Rivers to ITT Rayonier
    [Show full text]
  • Rule 391-3-6-.03. Water Use Classifications and Water Quality Standards
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. Rule 391-3-6-.03. Water Use Classifications and Water Quality Standards ( 1) Purpose. The establishment of water quality standards. (2) W ate r Quality Enhancement: (a) The purposes and intent of the State in establishing Water Quality Standards are to provide enhancement of water quality and prevention of pollution; to protect the public health or welfare in accordance with the public interest for drinking water supplies, conservation of fish, wildlife and other beneficial aquatic life, and agricultural, industrial, recreational, and other reasonable and necessary uses and to maintain and improve the biological integrity of the waters of the State. ( b) The following paragraphs describe the three tiers of the State's waters. (i) Tier 1 - Existing instream water uses and the level of water quality necessary to protect the existing uses shall be maintained and protected. (ii) Tier 2 - Where the quality of the waters exceed levels necessary to support propagation of fish, shellfish, and wildlife and recreation in and on the water, that quality shall be maintained and protected unless the division finds, after full satisfaction of the intergovernmental coordination and public participation provisions of the division's continuing planning process, that allowing lower water quality is necessary to accommodate important economic or social development in the area in which the waters are located.
    [Show full text]
  • Total Maximum Daily Load Evaluation for Seventy-Two Stream Segments
    Total Maximum Daily Load Evaluation for Seventy-Two Stream Segments in the Oconee River Basin for Fecal Coliform Submitted to: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 4 Atlanta, Georgia Submitted by: The Georgia Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Division Atlanta, Georgia January 2007 Total Maximum Daily Load Evaluation January 2007 Oconee River Basin (Fecal Coliform) Table of Contents Section Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. iv 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Watershed Description......................................................................................................1 1.3 Water Quality Standard.....................................................................................................5 2.0 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT ...................................................................................... 15 3.0 SOURCE ASSESSMENT .................................................................................................... 16 3.1 Point Source Assessment ............................................................................................... 16 3.2 Nonpoint Source Assessment........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Cobb Marietta
    Form 10-306 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (Oct. 1972) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Georgia NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Cobb INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM FOR NPS USE ONLY FOR FEDERAL PROPERTIES ENTRY DATE (Type all entries - complete applicable sections) COMMON: _JVr ~~ " ~ • : - Kennesaw Mountain National:Battlefield Park AND/OR HISTORIC: STREET AND NUMBER: P. O. : BOK 1167 On western edge of Marietta, GA^just .of£ US CITY OR TOWN: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT: Marietta 7th STATE: COUNTY: , CODE Georgia : 137: . Cobb 067 ACCESSIBLE OWNERSHIP STATUS TO THE PUBLIC District | | Building L7Q Public Public Acquisition: Occupied Yes: Site' Q Structure L~3 Private Q In Process Unoccupied Qtl Restricted Q Object C] Both Q Being Considered Preservation work | | Unrestricted- in progress PRESENT USE (Check One or More as Appropriate) Q Agricultural [_J Government | | Transportation Comments t - [~~1 Commercial | | Industrial Q Private Residence Other fSpec/fy; [ ] Educational [^Military Q Religious | 1 Entertainment [~~| Museum I | Scientific Ui IU National Park ^Service, Kenne'saw Mountain National. Battlefield Park REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS: (I! applicable) STREET AMD NUMBER: Southeast Region Cl TY OR TOWN: Atlanta COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS. ETC: Cobb County Courthouse STREET AND NUMBER: 177 Washington Avenue, N. ; E CITY_OR TOWN: Marietta TITLE OF SURVEY: None DATE OF SURVEY: DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS: STREET AND NUMBER: CITY OR TOWN: (Check One) f~l Excellent Stl Good Q Fair I | Deteriorated [ | Ruin* Q Unexpoted CONDITION (Check One) (Check One) (2Q Altered Q Unaltered Q Moved (X) Original Site DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (it known) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE Kennesaw Mountain is an erosional granitic hornblende remnant located in the upper Georgia Piedmont.
    [Show full text]
  • Fecal Coliform TMDL Report
    Total Maximum Daily Load Evaluation for Nineteen Stream Segments in the Tennessee River Basin for Fecal Coliform Submitted to: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 4 Atlanta, Georgia Submitted by: The Georgia Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Division Atlanta, Georgia January 2004 Total Maximum Daily Load Evaluation January 2004 Tennessee River Basin (Fecal coliform) Table of Contents Section Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. iv 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Watershed Description......................................................................................................1 1.3 Water Quality Standard.....................................................................................................5 2.0 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................ 8 3.0 SOURCE ASSESSMENT ...................................................................................................... 9 3.1 Point Source Assessment ................................................................................................. 9 3.2 Nonpoint Source Assessment........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Integrated 305(B)/303(D) List
    2020 Integrated 305(b)/303(d) List - Streams Reach Name/ID Reach Location/County River Basin/ Assessment/ Cause/ Size/Unit Category/ Notes Use Data Provider Source Priority Alex Creek Mason Cowpen Branch to Altamaha Not Supporting DO 3 4a TMDL completed DO 2002. Altamaha River GAR030701060503 Wayne Fishing 1,55,10 NP Miles Altamaha River Confluence of Oconee and Altamaha Supporting 72 1 TMDL completed Fish Tissue (Mercury) 2002. Ocmulgee Rivers to ITT Rayonier GAR030701060401 Appling, Wayne, Jeff Davis Fishing 1,55 Miles Altamaha River ITT Rayonier to Altamaha Assessment 20 3 TMDL completed Fish Tissue (Mercury) 2002. More Penholoway Creek Pending data need to be collected and evaluated before it GAR030701060402 Wayne Fishing 10,55 Miles can be determined whether the designated use of Fishing is being met. Altamaha River Penholoway Creek to Altamaha Supporting 27 1 Butler River GAR030701060501 Wayne, Glynn, McIntosh Fishing 1,55 Miles Beards Creek Chapel Creek to Spring Altamaha Not Supporting Bio F 7 4a TMDL completed Bio F 2017. Branch GAR030701060308 Tattnall, Long Fishing 4 NP Miles Beards Creek Spring Branch to Altamaha Not Supporting Bio F 11 4a TMDL completed Bio F in 2012. Altamaha River GAR030701060301 Tattnall Fishing 1,55,10,4 NP, UR Miles Big Cedar Creek Griffith Branch to Little Altamaha Assessment 5 3 This site has a narrative rank of fair for Cedar Creek Pending macroinvertebrates. Waters with a narrative rank GAR030701070108 Washington Fishing 59 Miles of fair will remain in Category 3 until EPD completes the reevaluation of the metrics used to assess macroinvertebrate data. Big Cedar Creek Little Cedar Creek (at Altamaha Not Supporting FC 6 5 EPD needs to determine the "natural DO" for the Donovan Hwy) to Little area before a use assessment is made.
    [Show full text]
  • False Dichotomy Between Growth and Clean Water? the Harpeth River Experience with Citizen Suits and Beyond
    River Management Society Supporting Professionals Who Study, Protect, and Manage RMS SPRING 2017 VOLUME 30, NO. 1 North America’s Rivers Southeast Focus RMS Pro-Purchase News..................... 4 Virginia’s Scenic Rivers ........................ 6 Restoring the Mulberry River ................ 8 Tennessee Wildlife Federation Gift ....... 9 The Obion Basin Fight ........................ 10 Family Fun on the Pascagoula ........... 13 Tennessee River Basin Network......... 14 Conservation Easements - A Tool ....... 15 Bama’s Bone Dry ................................ 16 Wonks, Water, Walls, and... .............. 18 Georgia Water Trails ........................... 21 San Antonio River Authority ................ 24 RMS Chapter Updates ....................... 27 Innovative Tennessee River Project ... 28 Google Earth aerial image of the Franklin sewer plant and Harpeth River. False Dichotomy Between Growth and Clean Water? The Harpeth River Experience with Citizen Suits and Beyond by James M. Redwine The State Scenic Harpeth River, Greater Founded in 1999, the Harpeth River So often, the choice is portrayed to be Nashville, and the Harpeth River Watershed Association is a 501(c)(3) between clean water and growth, with Watershed Association not-for-profit, science-based conservation clean water inevitably the loser. The organization dedicated to protecting the Harpeth River Watershed Association The Harpeth River is among the State Scenic Harpeth River and clean (HRWA) does not believe that this always unique freshwater river systems of the water in Tennessee. To protect the river has to be the case. Rather, HRWA’s recent Southeast. These systems contain some and effect change, HRWA collaborates experience with a citizen suit under the of the greatest variety of aquatic life with landowners, businesses, community, federal Clean Water Act (CWA) (and its in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Internal Loading on Algal Biomass in Lake Allatoona, a Southeastern Piedmont Impoundment
    EFFECTS OF INTERNAL LOADING ON ALGAL BIOMASS IN LAKE ALLATOONA, A SOUTHEASTERN PIEDMONT IMPOUNDMENT by Elena Louise Ceballos (Under the direction of Todd C. Rasmussen) Abstract Cultural eutrophication of lakes is the accelerated nutrient enrichment resulting in detri- mental ecological effects such as algal blooms, lake anoxia and toxic metal release from sediments. Cultural eutrophication is a common occurrence in Piedmont impoundments in Georgia, as well as lakes and impoundments throughout the world. It often results in water unsafe for agricultural use, recreation and drinking. To reduce the cultural eutrophication of local Piedmont impoundments, recent regulatory controls for nutrients were established as part of the Clean Lakes program and court-ordered total maximum daily loads (TMDLs). These regulatory efforts focus on the reduction and minimization of point-source watershed nutrient inputs, primarily phosphorus, into lake sys- tems, as P is the limiting nutrient in Piedmont impoundments. Thus, reductions in phos- phorus loading are expected to improve lake water quality. However, in the Piedmont, as well as worldwide, many lakes continue to experience algal blooms and lake anoxia after sources of external loading are discontinued. The process of nutrient desorption from sediments, known as internal loading, has been identified to be a source of algal-available P, as well as other nutrients. The conditions under which internal loading takes place are region-specific as they vary based on local physical, chemical and biological conditions. The purpose of our research was to quantify changes in algal biomass in response to internal loading in Southeast Piedmont impoundments. The results from a mesocosm exper- iment, physical and chemical sediment analysis, and algal assays were used to characterize algal-availabile phosphorus in Southeastern Piedmont impoundments.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Integrated 305(B)
    2018 Integrated 305(b)/303(d) List - Streams Reach Name/ID Reach Location/County River Basin/ Assessment/ Cause/ Size/Unit Category/ Notes Use Data Provider Source Priority Alex Creek Mason Cowpen Branch to Altamaha Not Supporting DO 3 4a TMDL completed DO 2002. Altamaha River GAR030701060503 Wayne Fishing 1,55,10 NP Miles Altamaha River Confluence of Oconee and Altamaha Supporting 72 1 TMDL completed TWR 2002. Ocmulgee Rivers to ITT Rayonier GAR030701060401 Appling, Wayne, Jeff Davis Fishing 1,55 Miles Altamaha River ITT Rayonier to Penholoway Altamaha Assessment 20 3 TMDL completed TWR 2002. More data need to Creek Pending be collected and evaluated before it can be determined whether the designated use of Fishing is being met. GAR030701060402 Wayne Fishing 10,55 Miles Altamaha River Penholoway Creek to Butler Altamaha Supporting 27 1 River GAR030701060501 Wayne, Glynn, McIntosh Fishing 1,55 Miles Beards Creek Chapel Creek to Spring Branch Altamaha Not Supporting Bio F 7 4a TMDL completed Bio F 2017. GAR030701060308 Tattnall, Long Fishing 4 NP Miles Beards Creek Spring Branch to Altamaha Altamaha Not Supporting Bio F 11 4a TMDL completed Bio F in 2012. River GAR030701060301 Tattnall Fishing 1,55,10,4 NP, UR Miles Big Cedar Creek Griffith Branch to Little Cedar Altamaha Assessment 5 3 This site has a narrative rank of fair for Creek Pending macroinvertebrates. Waters with a narrative rank of fair will remain in Category 3 until EPD completes the reevaluation of the metrics used to assess macroinvertebrate data. GAR030701070108 Washington Fishing 59 Miles Big Cedar Creek Little Cedar Creek to Ohoopee Altamaha Not Supporting DO, FC 3 4a TMDLs completed DO 2002 & FC (2002 & 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Sept 21, 2009, Part 1
    HopkinsHopkins RoadRoad FlyoverFlyover SweetwaterSweetwater ParkPark www.digitalglobe.com/index.php/48/Products?product _id=2 Pavia Circle Caraustar Facility Chastain Meadows Parkway Austell Powder Springs Road Lessons Learned • After a flooding disaster the public could care less about: – …how much it rained; or – …what frequency the rain event was; or – …how saturated the ground was; or – …how many culverts became clogged; or – …whether or not they should have had flood insurance Lessons Learned • All the general public wants to know is… …what government will do and how fast Lessons Learned • Many – …living in the floodplain still do not have flood insurance – …do not understand what the FEMA floodplain maps represent – …private Dam Owners do not understand or accept what their individual responsibilities are… Statistics • The rains returned water levels in the region’s two largest reservoirs, Lake Lanier and Allatoona Lake to pre-drought levels: – Lake Lanier rose by more than 3-ft to Elevation 1068 by September 25th and returned to full pool in October – Allatoona Lake rose to Elevation 853.25 on September 23, more than 13 feet above flood Pool at Elevation 840. Statistics • In Cobb County, the following creeks reached or exceeded the 500-year frequency event: – Sweetwater Creek – Noses Creek – Noonday Creek – Butler Creek, and – Powder Springs Creek Statistics • On Sweetwater Creek near Austell… – High Water Marks showed peak stage of record at 30.8 ft – Previous peak stage recorded 7/11/2005) from Hurricane Dennis at 21.87 ft. –
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Chapters 3 to 5
    CHAPTER 3 establish water use classifications and water quality standards for the waters of the State. Water Quality For each water use classification, water quality Monitoring standards or criteria have been developed, which establish the framework used by the And Assessment Environmental Protection Division to make water use regulatory decisions. All of Georgia’s Background waters are currently classified as fishing, recreation, drinking water, wild river, scenic Water Resources Atlas The river miles and river, or coastal fishing. Table 3-2 provides a lake acreage estimates are based on the U.S. summary of water use classifications and Geological Survey (USGS) 1:100,000 Digital criteria for each use. Georgia’s rules and Line Graph (DLG), which provides a national regulations protect all waters for the use of database of hydrologic traces. The DLG in primary contact recreation by having a fecal coordination with the USEPA River Reach File coliform bacteria standard of a geometric provides a consistent computerized mean of 200 per 100 ml for all waters with the methodology for summing river miles and lake use designations of fishing or drinking water to acreage. The 1:100,000 scale map series is apply during the months of May - October (the the most detailed scale available nationally in recreational season). digital form and includes 75 to 90 percent of the hydrologic features on the USGS 1:24,000 TABLE 3-1. WATER RESOURCES ATLAS scale topographic map series. Included in river State Population (2006 Estimate) 9,383,941 mile estimates are perennial streams State Surface Area 57,906 sq.mi.
    [Show full text]