İSLAM ARAŞTIRMALARI Journal of Islamic Research البحوث االسالمية Yıl 3 Sayı 1 Mayıs 2010

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

İSLAM ARAŞTIRMALARI Journal of Islamic Research البحوث االسالمية Yıl 3 Sayı 1 Mayıs 2010 Avrupa İslam Üniversitesi İSLAM ARAŞTIRMALARI Journal of Islamic Research البحوث االسالمية Yıl 3 Sayı 1 Mayıs 2010 İSLAM ARAŞTIRMALARI The contribution of Egyptian troops in the middle of the 19th century to the Ottoman struggle in the Balkans. Assistant Professor Rahman ADEMİ Çankırı Karatekin University Introduction As has been already established, the 19th Century determined the fate of the Ottoman Empire. Universal values such as freedom and nationalism, which emerged after the French revolution, spread to Ottoman regions, home to a great many different ethnic groups. These movements can be traced quite clearly from 1815 and continued, with increasing impact, throughout the 19th century. However, it would not be strictly correct for us to regard anti-Ottoman movements as having been caused solely by the French Revolution. Non- Muslim communities learned more of their rights and freedoms as a result of the revolution, and they began not to regard with goodwill the cruelties they endured as a result of the degeneration and corruption of the Ottoman bureaucracy, which spread considerably in the 18th century and existed before then.1 A similar situation, albeit for different reasons and with different dimensions, existed in China, Russia, Germany and Italy, and 262 Yıl 3 Sayı 1 Mayıs 2010 İSLAM ARAŞTIRMALARI nationalist streams continued their activities in these countries too.2 The ıshlahat reforms undertaken as a result of pressure from Western states transformed into a process that favoured the non-Muslim community. This development greatly disturbed the war-weary Muslims, who felt the results and weight of all the state's problems were on their shoulders. The new arrangments – established a result of both the tanzimat and the ıshlahat edicts – only caused the state and Muslim community's problems to increase, while the wishes of the Christian minority continued to be met with increased regularity. Far from being demanded by the people, these reforms occured in accordance with the calculations of Western states. They were contrary to the wishes of the Ottoman administration and were of a “top down”, forced nature. The actual determining role here fell to the strong states of Europe and to Russia: the regional political and social forces in the Balkans have never been able to develop by themselves and have never attained a level where they could act alone.3 Russia made some important gains against the Ottoman Empire as a result of the 1774 treaty of Kuchuk Kainarji (Turkish: Kucuk Kaynarca). At the end of that same year, Russia opened a consulate in Izmir. It was closely followed in January 1775 by another in Thessaloniki.4 As a result of the above mentioned rights and privileges granted to minorities, the existing balance in Ottoman society was completely disrupted. The Muslims, having until then been the dominant populace, began to lose out economically and socially. In addition to this, the frequently restless minorities succeeded as a result of these new rights in turning their separatiest thoughts into armed movements. Efforts to improve aspects of the state that did not function and new problems and needs that emerged through time were not sufficient to solve the issues, and the communities in question, far from being pacified, were provoked by such external forces as European states and Russia to expand their separatist activities. On the large part, relations between European states and Russia were based on competitiveness, but when it came to the Ottoman Empire they were occasionally able to work in alliance. It was in this context that the European powers referred to the minorities wishing to break away from the Ottoman Empire as “freedom fighters”, a description which disturbed Sultan Mahmud II. According to him, peoples such as these had stood up against a legitimate administration and could only be described as rebels.5 Russia's long-standing effort and strategy of reaching warm waters in the south via the Straits would occasionally show itself in a more fervent form, depending of the situation. The invasion of Egypt in 1798 by the French general Napoleon Bonaparte put the Ottoman Empire in a difficult situation, as it was forced to enter into alliance with its historical enemies Russia and Yıl 3 Sayı 1 Mayıs 2010 263 İSLAM ARAŞTIRMALARI Britain in order to save Egypt. The Russian fleet used the opportunity to cross through the Straits to enter the Mediterranean for the first time and, with the intention of making a temporary situation permanent, it began to construct its foreign policy towards this aim. Thus, the “Question of the Straits” was born. Russia's activities, provoking first the Greeks and then the Bulgarians, must be seen as a part of this policy.6 This period of hardship accelerated the collapse of the Ottoman economy, just as the state was working to cater for the mounting political demands of non-Muslims living in the Balkans and other Ottoman lands in just about every area. By 1870, war had taken the Ottoman Empire to a level of debt that could not have been drawn in normal conditions, and the Porte was forced to turn to the Galata bankers.7 Of the 118 years between 1800 and 1918, 53 had been spent engaged in wars with different states. This is a disastrous situation for any state, regardless of its strength, and was one faced by the Ottman Empire.8 As they struggled to cope with such huge economic and military troubles, its rivals had entered into a grand period of economic development. Between 1870 and 1890, industrial production increased by 80% in Britain, 100% in France and 270% in Germany. In Russia, the number of factories over a mere five year period – 1886 to 1890 – increased from 2500 to 6000.9 Relations between Mehmet Ali Pasha and the Ottoman administration Despite having had no formal military education, Mehmet Ali Pasha's military achievements saw him advance rapidly, to the extent that his strength established him as a rival to the Ottoman Empire. While not being an administrator or an officer in the classical sense, the economic development of the Egypt vilayet under his watch could be described as extraordinary. His strength stemmed from his firm understanding of the economy, and the agriculture and trade systems. In a short time, Egypt's tax revenue increased from 13,000 kese (moneybags) to 35 thousand, and later to 400 thousand.10 He used much of these resources to strengthen Egypt's administrative and military structure.11 The port town of Alexandria in particular emerged as a highly developed town in terms of agriculture and trade, and contributed greatly to the income of the Egyptian province.12 By raising its army in the Western style, it was able to create a small but effective military force.13 But all of Egypt's income was under Mehmet Ali Pasha's control, and it is not really possible to say that the people benefited from the rising income.14 Egypt's richness was essentially gathered at the administrative level; the value of agricultural procurement per head in Egypt prior to the First World War was close to and below that of the Ottoman Empire.15 It can be seen that the level of welfare attained by Mehmet Ali Pasha could not be continued by his successors. What is more, the Egyptian 264 Yıl 3 Sayı 1 Mayıs 2010 İSLAM ARAŞTIRMALARI administrators following him delved into extravagance and debauchery, wasting the country's limited resources. In addition to his own talents, it is beyond doubt that an important factor in Mehmet Ali Pasha's assendance is the support of the Ottoman Empire's rivals, the European states. When the Ottoman-Egyptian conflict broke out, the Europeans followed a successful policy for their own interests by pledging all necesssary support to the Ottomans.16 When Britain and France's interests in Egypt are taken into account it is not possible to say thhat this “support” was particularly to the benefit of the Ottoman administration. It was a strong possibility that the Ottoman state would be damaged by the conflict, which would suit European interests. The offer of support also allowed Britain, France and Russia to take on the role of active mediation in Ottoman-Egyptian peace talks, which granted the opportunity to interfere in Ottoman internal affairs. The Ottoman administration was forced to seek outside help in order to protect its territory. The province of Egypt had the means to provide the Ottoman state with financial or military support in exchange for a number of concessions and interests. Mehmet Ali Pasha, governor of Egypt, was aware of the Ottoman administrative and military weaknesses, and wanted to use the opportunity to strengthen his own position. His rise to the governorship had already been disputed by the Ottoman administration: it was only permitted following his assistance in defeating the Vahabi rebel attempt to capture Medina. It is for this reason that the bilateral relationship between Mehmet Ali Pasha and the Ottoman administration was based not on reciprocal trust and contentedness, but on the fulfilment of mutual interests.17 It can be said that Mehmet Ali Pasha preserved Egypt's independence from the Ottoman Empire because of military power, while the administrators who followed him did so through monetary aid.18Therefore, Egypt was militarily at its most powerful during the time of Mehmet Ali Pasha. The military capacity of the province of Egypt and its contribution to the Ottoman Empire first became clear during the Greek rebellion in Rumelia in 1821. The revolt of Teledelenli Ali Pasha against the Ottoman administration19 encouraged the Greeks, already been provoked by the West and Russia, to take action.20 The Ottoman leadership attempted to suppress this first revolt in Crete21 but was unable to do so, even after long-lasting efforts.
Recommended publications
  • Download This PDF File
    International Journal Advances in Social Science and Humanities Available online at: www.ijassh.com RESEARCH ARTICLE Turkey, the Melting Pot of the West and East: An Evaluation of the Benefits of Western and Eastern Civilizations for this Adaptive Nation Osman Chuah Abdullah* International Islamic University Malaysia, Jalan Sungei Busu, Gombak, Malaysia. *Corresponding Author: Email: [email protected] Introduction The Republic of Turkey is located south east of however, is very surprised that the Ottoman Europe and south west of Asia (the portion of Empire was able to last for six centuries. He Turkey west of the Bosporus is geographically credits the empire as an excellent illustration of part of Europe), bordering the Black Sea, between ‘challenge and responses’ [5]. Talat Sait Halman Bulgaria and Georgia, and bordering the Aegean describes the adoptive and adaptive receptiveness Sea and the Mediterranean Sea, between Greece to changes of the empire [6]. The Ottoman and Syria. It has a population of 71,892,808 in Empire no longer exists; however, scholars persist July 2008; 99.8% of the people are Muslims with that the empire occupies a major focus as the long 0.2% Christians and Jews. Moreover, 80% of the and expansive rule gave way to the path of population are Turkish and the remaining 20% transformation into modern Turkey [6]. are Kurdish [1]. Research Methodology This is a nation which has gone through various rise and decline of civilizations, the modernization The study involves the gathering of data on the by Mustapha Kemal Atarturk and the advantages Ottoman rule, the modernization and the melting of associating with and being influenced by the pot of Turkey with the absorption of quality of West.
    [Show full text]
  • Blood Ties: Religion, Violence, and the Politics of Nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878
    BLOOD TIES BLOOD TIES Religion, Violence, and the Politics of Nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878–1908 I˙pek Yosmaog˘lu Cornell University Press Ithaca & London Copyright © 2014 by Cornell University All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or parts thereof, must not be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher. For information, address Cornell University Press, Sage House, 512 East State Street, Ithaca, New York 14850. First published 2014 by Cornell University Press First printing, Cornell Paperbacks, 2014 Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Yosmaog˘lu, I˙pek, author. Blood ties : religion, violence,. and the politics of nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878–1908 / Ipek K. Yosmaog˘lu. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8014-5226-0 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN 978-0-8014-7924-3 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Macedonia—History—1878–1912. 2. Nationalism—Macedonia—History. 3. Macedonian question. 4. Macedonia—Ethnic relations. 5. Ethnic conflict— Macedonia—History. 6. Political violence—Macedonia—History. I. Title. DR2215.Y67 2013 949.76′01—dc23 2013021661 Cornell University Press strives to use environmentally responsible suppliers and materials to the fullest extent possible in the publishing of its books. Such materials include vegetable-based, low-VOC inks and acid-free papers that are recycled, totally chlorine-free, or partly composed of nonwood fibers. For further information, visit our website at www.cornellpress.cornell.edu. Cloth printing 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Paperback printing 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 To Josh Contents Acknowledgments ix Note on Transliteration xiii Introduction 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Sabiha Gökçen's 80-Year-Old Secret‖: Kemalist Nation
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO ―Sabiha Gökçen‘s 80-Year-Old Secret‖: Kemalist Nation Formation and the Ottoman Armenians A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Communication by Fatma Ulgen Committee in charge: Professor Robert Horwitz, Chair Professor Ivan Evans Professor Gary Fields Professor Daniel Hallin Professor Hasan Kayalı Copyright Fatma Ulgen, 2010 All rights reserved. The dissertation of Fatma Ulgen is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ Chair University of California, San Diego 2010 iii DEDICATION For my mother and father, without whom there would be no life, no love, no light, and for Hrant Dink (15 September 1954 - 19 January 2007 iv EPIGRAPH ―In the summertime, we would go on the roof…Sit there and look at the stars…You could reach the stars there…Over here, you can‘t.‖ Haydanus Peterson, a survivor of the Armenian Genocide, reminiscing about the old country [Moush, Turkey] in Fresno, California 72 years later. Courtesy of the Zoryan Institute Oral History Archive v TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page……………………………………………………………....
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of the Visuals Associated with the National Identity in Turkish Republic Revolution History and Kemalism Textbooks *
    European Journal of Educational Research Volume 7, Issue 2, 267 - 279. ISSN: 2165-8714 http://www.eu-jer.com/ Investigation of the Visuals Associated with the National identity in Turkish Republic Revolution History and Kemalism Textbooks * Mehmet Elban ** Bayburt University, TURKEY Received: February 13, 2018 ▪ Revised: March 14, 2018 ▪ Accepted: March 14, 2018 Abstract: In this research, images related to national identity were examined in history textbooks. In the first stage, nationalism, the historical course of the Turkish national identity and related literature were examined, and some components of national identity were determined. Various categories related to national identity have been formed from the elements obtained. The data about the categories were collected through document analysis. In the second phase, 8 history textbooks taught in the years 1930-2014 were selected as samples. Content analysis was used in the examination of the mentioned textbooks, and quantitative method was chosen in data analysis. In this context, data obtained by document analysis were analyzed with SPSS 13 statistical program. Chi-square tests, Bonferroni corrections for chi-square tests and graphs were used in the analyzes. The significance level for all analyzes was taken as .05. In the research, it was determined that republic values and revolutions, national struggle and the images related to the founder leader Mustafa Kemal Atatürk be a most used in Turkish Republic Revolution History and Kemalism textbooks concerning national identity. In addition, it has been found that the images of national symbols such as homeland maps, flag, parliament, and capital are used too much for the national identity.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MODERNIZATION of the OTTOMAN NAVY DURING the REIGN of SULTAN ABDÜLAZİZ (1861-1876) By
    THE MODERNIZATION OF THE OTTOMAN NAVY DURING THE REIGN OF SULTAN ABDÜLAZİZ (1861-1876) by DİLARA DAL A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies Department of Classics, Ancient History and Archaeology College of Arts and Law The University of Birmingham April, 2015 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT The main focus of this study is to examine the modernization of the Ottoman navy during the reign of Sultan Abdülaziz, exploring naval administration, education, and technology. Giving a summary of the transformation of shipbuilding technologies and bureaucratic institutions of the Ottoman naval forces between 1808 and 1861, it analyses the structure of the Ottoman navy, its level of development in comparison to previous periods of time, and the condition of the vessels making up the naval fleet from 1861 to 1876. It also intends to evaluate the character of existing administrative structures at the outset of Abdülaziz’s reign in 1861 and the nature of subsequent changes, including structural reorganization of the Imperial Naval Arsenal, the Ministry of Marine, and the Naval Academy, as well as advancements in military training and seafaring; all within the context of the impact of these changes on the military, political, and economic condition of the Empire during the reign of Sultan Abdülaziz.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan ® Copyright by Haluk Necdet Goze»* 1967 MODERNISM and TRADITIONALISM in the OTTOMAN Emfrjre 179Q-L£2K
    66-1602 GOZE, Haluk Necdet, 1929- MODERNISM AND TRADITIONALISM IN THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE 1790-1922. The American University, Ph.D., 1964 Political Science, international law and relations University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan ® Copyright by Haluk Necdet Goze»* 1967 MODERNISM AND TRADITIONALISM IN THE OTTOMAN EMfrjRE 179Q-l£2k by tf’.’j» vNecdet G6ze Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The American University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND ORGANIZATION Signatures of Committee: Chairman: Date: On*? 'tv. Graduate Dean Dates eyK04j H. I4& V l,BRARY AUG o *KASK»CT3HD.c Soo z. tiu TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE PREFACE ......................................... v CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION .............................. 1 II. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND....................... 10 The Origins of the Turkish People 10 The Seljuk T u r k s ........................ 11 The Rise of the Ottoman Turks ............. 13 The Decline of the Ottoman Empire ......... 15 Ottoman Institutions .................... 16 III. REFORMS OF SULTAN SELIM III AND THE FAILURE OF THE MODERNISTS......... 31 Early efforts at reform ................ 31 The Reforms of Sultan Selim ......... 37 The Reform of Sultan Mahmud I I ........... 41 Social and Economic Problems • 46 IV. THE RESHID PASHA REFORMS AND THE STRUGGLE BETWEEN MODERNISTS AND TRADITIONALIST 1839-1876 ......................'......... 60 The 1839 Reshid Pasha Reforms and the Temporary Victory of the Modernists .... 60 The Role of the Ottoman Diplomatic Envoys ••••• 68 ill CHAPTER PAGE The Struggle between Modernists and Traditionalists during the Tanzimat Period 1839-1876 ...................... 71 Economic and Social Problems .. ......... 75 Rise of Nationalism .................... 80 The Role of the Ottoman P r e s s ..........
    [Show full text]
  • History Education Within Cultural Policies of the Republican Era; Comparison of One-Party Regime and Multi-Party System (1923 -1960)
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 116 ( 2014 ) 2210 – 2214 5th World Conference on Educational Sciences WCES-2013 History education within cultural policies of the republican era; comparison of one-party regime and multi-party system (1923 -1960) Assoc. Prof. Bengül Salman Bolat**, Dr. Mahmut Bolat** * Ahi Evran University Faculty of Education Department of Social Sciences Teaching, Kırşehir / Turkey ** Ahi Evran University / Department of Atatürk’s Principles and Revolution History, Kırşehir / Turkey Abstract The most effective elements upon policies that were conducted in fields of education and culture during the period of Atatürk were nationalism, secularism and westernism. The field of history was also shaped in this direction as a part of culture and the history education was arranged accordingly. During the period of İnönü, the humanist movement of thought affected the culture policies and being different from the period of Atatürk, humanism started to be effective in history courses, alongside of the nationalism, which was taught predominantly. The process of multi-party life started in Turkey within the new world order as from 1945 and the Democratic Party, which was established as the opposition party in 1946, came to power as a result of the elections in 1950. During the period of the Democratic Party, the studies on the Ottoman History increased. Some of the historians of this period considered the historiography of the one-party regime romantic and dreamer, and they defended the necessity of teaching the historical subjects with a scientific method and critical aspect. ©Selection 2013 The and Authors. peer Publishedreview under by Elsevier the responsibility Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PRINCIPLES of KEMALISM* Mustafa Kemal Atatürk (1881-1938)
    THE PRINCIPLES OF KEMALISM* Turkish and Foreign Intellectual Impact on Mustafa Kemal, Works by Atatürk, the Six Principles and the Kadro's Attempt to Systematize the Kemalist Revo- lutian. Prof. Dr. Türkkaya ATAÖV Mustafa Kemal Atatürk (1881- 1938) is not generally- known as a "builder" of theories. it was his deliberate choice not to leave behind an "inflexible doctrine". He wanted his teachings to be dynamic views suiting the need to become contemporary in every way. Ideologies, no doubt. play a role in all regimes. Many states even seek to solve their problems with the impact of a parti cu lar doctrine. it is only natural that a mavement like the Kemalist Revo- lutian should have its own set of values. This paper aims, first, to summarize Turkish and foreign intellectual impact on Mustafa Kemal, to be follo- wed by a short bibliographical display of his own writings, with a conseqüent definition of the Six Principles (Altı Ok) that he authored, with a further discussion of attempts, principally by a group of thinkers and writers around the monthly Kadro (The Cadre) to systematize Kemalist prin- ciples. it may not be wrong to say that the paper will mainly dwell on the Kadro Movement, the rest serving as prelude. i Atatürk had died a comparatively young man. He was less than thirty-five when the whole world first heard his * A shortened version of this paper was read by the author as a basis for discussions during the "Atatürk and Nehru Week" in New De!hi Tndia (981). 20 THE TURKISH YEARBOOK [VOL.
    [Show full text]
  • A Glance at the Ottoman-American Relations in Pre and Post-Constitutional Period1
    International Journal of Liberal Arts and Social Science Vol. 2 No. 9 December, 2014 A GLANCE AT THE OTTOMAN-AMERICAN RELATIONS IN 1 PRE AND POST-CONSTITUTIONAL PERIOD HAKKI YAPICI Gumushane University ABSTRACT Turkish-American relationships can be evaluated in two different periods as Ottoman and Republic Period. In the last quarter of the 18th century, while the Ottoman Empire was in the period of decline, The United States declared independence gaining a remarkable place in the history. Even though the recent Turkish- American friendship appears to be the result of the political events that took place after the Second World War, this friendship can be described as the interaction of the two different geographic regions for a long historical period of time. The American-Ottoman relations that started with the commercial activities of the U.S. continued taking shape under the influence of the political events which developed throughout the 19th and 20th century in the world. The management mentality of the Ottoman Empire especially changed considerably with the constitutional period, and acquired a new aspect that facilitated the Empire's relationships with other countries taking it to a different conjuncture. The two countries established their first official relationship in the early 19th century. In the Naval Battle of Navarino2 Ottoman Navy was attacked by a powerful navy that consisted of British, French, and Russian Naval Forces. In this attack, which was also known as Navarino Raid, the Allied Navies destroyed the battleships of the Sultan and Mehmet Ali Pasha (20th November 1830)3 Navarin incidence created a stir in the international arena.
    [Show full text]
  • The Revol T of Cavallan Mehmet Ali Pasha** (1831-1841)
    THE REVOL T OF CAVALLAN MEHMET ALI PASHA** (1831-1841) C%~~Mehmet KOCAOGLU* INTRODUCTION The Ottoman ~mpire lived for many centuries as a society composed of peoples of different races. religions. languages. and cultures. Due to this peculiarity. "nationalism" and "independence" movements which started by the end of the 18. century. spread quickly across the Ottoman lands. Starting from the beginning of the 19 century. these political movements caused many revolts in the Empire and international disputes were inevitable to take place. During this period. vast areas of land which had strategic and economic value were stiH under the control of the Empire. Howev- er. the Ottoman Empire. which didn't keep up with the develop- ments of the Enlightenment Age in Europe and which couldn't ac- complish the Industrial Revolution. felt the economic and military problem s more harshly at the beginning of the 19. century. That is why. the states who had aspirations on the Ottoman Empire. propa- gated the ideas of nationalism and independence around the coun- try. The Great Powers who wished to conquer Egypt and control the eastem Mediterranean encouraged the uprisings in the Balkans and Morea. The first act of insurgency in the Balkans is that of the Serbian one in 1804. A little while after this incident. the Ottoman-Russian war of 1806-1812 broke out in. As the Russians were fighting back. they were also trying to make the Christian subjects in the Balkans to rise against the Ottoman empireı. * Assc. Prof. Dr. Mehmet KOCAOGLU, Turkish General Staff International Treati. es Research Department Direktor Ankara{fÜRKİYE.
    [Show full text]
  • Nation-Building and Cultural Heritage: a Study of Turkey and Its Greek Orthodox Community
    Trinity College Trinity College Digital Repository Senior Theses and Projects Student Scholarship Spring 2021 Nation-Building and Cultural Heritage: A Study of Turkey and Its Greek Orthodox Community Sophia E. Kyrou [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses Part of the Comparative Politics Commons, International Relations Commons, Near and Middle Eastern Studies Commons, and the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Kyrou, Sophia E., "Nation-Building and Cultural Heritage: A Study of Turkey and Its Greek Orthodox Community". Senior Theses, Trinity College, Hartford, CT 2021. Trinity College Digital Repository, https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses/870 i NATION-BUILDING AND CULTURAL HERITAGE: A STUDY OF TURKEY AND ITS GREEK ORTHODOX COMMUNITY A thesis presented by Sophia E. Kyrou to The Political Science Department in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Honors in Political Science Trinity College Hartford, CT April 19, 2021 Dr. Anthony Messina Dr. Stefanie Chambers Thesis Advisor Department Chair ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I begin by expressing my deepest gratitude to my advisor, Professor Anthony Messina. Professor Messina has guided me at every step along the way in this thesis, and he has also been my mentor in all things academic and intellectual throughout my time at Trinity. His encouragement on this project has been present and unwavering since I first shared the inklings of my idea for this thesis with him almost a year and a half ago. Professor Messina has been a constant source of patience, level-headedness, and generosity of time and spirit throughout this process. I am forever grateful for his mentorship, and I feel eternally fortunate that I took his Comparative Politics 101 class during the first semester of my freshman year, a decision that would have an unimaginably great impact on my development as a person and a thinker.
    [Show full text]
  • Kemalism in the Turkish Foreign Policy Discourse Showed Goal Thefactlevel There That Atatürk’S Civilization’
    A POSTSTRUCTURALIST APPROACH TO IDEOLOGY AND FOREIGN POLICY: KEMALISM IN THE TURKISH FOREIGN POLICY DISCOURSE By Özlem Demirtaú Bagdonas Submitted to Central European University Department of International Relations and European Studies In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Philosophy of Doctorate in Political Science Supervisors: Nicole Renee Lindstrom and Paul Roe Word Count: 90,082 CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2008 DECLARATION I hereby declare that no parts of the thesis have been submitted to no other institution different from CEU towards a degree. To my knowledge nor does the thesis contains unreferenced material or ideas from other authors. Özlem Demirtaú Bagdonas CEU eTD Collection ABSTRACT The foreign policy literature witnesses a renewed interest in the so-called ideational factors in foreign policy. Most of these works aim to show the independent impact of identities and ideas on a specific foreign policy action or orientation. In contrast, poststructuralist research agenda employs a discursive and indeterministic approach to study how interests and identities are reconstituted through foreign policy making. Building on this approach, this dissertation presents a theoretical framework for studying the role of ideology in foreign policy and argues that the relationship between foreign policy and ideology is discursively constructed; it is co-constitutive, rather than causal. Being a construct of the foreign policy discourse, ideology is not intrinsically suggestive of a particular policy, identity or rationality. The dissertation examines the role of a particular ideology, Kemalism, conceptualized here broadly as the set of ideas and objectives attributed to following Atatürk’s path. It focuses on the question of how Kemalism has served as a template in the Turkish official discourse to reconcile and counterpoise Turkey’s Western/European-orientation and the Cyprus policy – two allegedly incompatible foreign policies.
    [Show full text]