APA Eastern Division 2019 Annual Meeting Program

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

APA Eastern Division 2019 Annual Meeting Program The American Philosophical Association EASTERN DIVISION ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH ANNUAL MEETING PROGRAM SHERATON NEW YORK TIMES SQUARE NEW YORK, NEW YORK JANUARY 7 – 10, 2019 IMPORTANT NOTICES FOR MEETING ATTENDEES SESSION LOCATIONS Please note: this online version of the program does not include session locations. The locations of all individual sessions will be included in the paper program that you will receive when you pick up your registration materials at the meeting (if you opted to receive a paper program) as well as in the meeting app beginning the first day of the meeting. IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT REGISTRATION Please note: it costs $50 less to register in advance than to register at the meeting. Early bird registration at www.apaonline.org is available until December 20 at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time. Online registration will be closed from December 21 through January 6. Beginning on January 7, registration will reopen, and you may register online or at the meeting registration desk. PRONOUN STICKERS As a show of the APA’s commitment to diversity and inclusion, we will provide pronoun stickers for your name badge, including blank stickers that will allow you to use a pronoun of your own choosing. Stickers will be available for pickup at registration and can easily be worn as a show of solidarity, and a means of making our annual conference a friendly and safe environment for all. GENDER-NEUTRAL BATHROOMS AND QUIET ROOM Gender-neutral bathrooms and a quiet room will be available at the Sheraton New York Times Square. A key for the quiet room is available at the registration desk. 1 Special Events EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING Monday, January 7, 1:00–6:00 p.m. APA/AAPT TEACHING HUB Tuesday, January 8, 9:00 a.m.–10:30 p.m. Wednesday, January 9, 9:00 a.m.–10:00 p.m. PRIZE RECEPTION Tuesday, January 8, 5:00–6:00 p.m. RECEPTION Tuesday, January 8, 8:00 p.m.–Midnight BUSINESS MEETING Wednesday, January 9, 11:15 a.m.–12:15 p.m. RECEPTION Wednesday, January 9, 9:00 p.m.–Midnight 2019 Program Committee Ted Sider, Chair (2019) Jose Medina (2020) Jeff Dunn, ex officio Japa Pallikkathayil (2019) Brad Cokelet (2019) Robin James (2019) Antonia LoLordo (2019) Patricia Blanchette (2020) Max Pensky (2019) John Murungi (2020) Amy Allen (2020) Erik Wielenberg (2019) Otávio Bueno (2020) G. J. Postema (2019) Scott MacDonald (2020) Carol Hay (2020) Jorge Garcia (2020) Karen Bennett (2019) John Lysaker (2020) Sarah Moss (2019) Steven Gross (2020) Chris Haufe (2020) Andrea Pitts (2020) Susanna Siegel (2020) Rachel Singpurwalla (2020) 2 The AAPT/APA Teaching Hub The American Association of Philosophy Teachers (AAPT) and the American Philosophical Association Committee on the Teaching of Philosophy (CTP) have co- organized a two-day conference on teaching for the 2019 Eastern Division meeting. We are aiming to bring the collegial and supportive culture of the AAPT to the APA; highlight teaching within the context of an APA meeting; stretch beyond the traditional APA session format to offer sessions that model active learning; and attract a broader range of philosophers to the divisional meetings. TUESDAY, JANUARY 8 M1 9:00 a.m.–Noon. M2 Noon–2:00 p.m. M3 2:00–5:00 p.m. M4 5:15–7:15 p.m. M5 7:30–10:30 p.m. WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 5 M6 9:00–11:100 a.m. M7 11:15 a.m.–1:15 p.m. M8 1:30–4:30 p.m. M9 7:00–10:00 p.m. 3 Divisional and Affiliated Group Programs MONDAY, JANUARY 7 REGISTRATION 10:00 a.m.–6:30 p.m., registration desk EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE LUNCH 11:00 a.m.–1:00 p.m., location TBA EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING 1:00–6:00 p.m., location TBA MONDAY LATE MORNING, 11:00 A.M.–1:00 P.M. DIVISIONAL PROGRAM 1A Symposium: The Metaphysical Structure of the De Se: Constructing a Functional Account of Self Chair: Julie Yoo (California State University, Northridge) Speaker: Joanna Lawson (Yale University) Commentators: Jonathan Cohen (University of California, San Diego) Neil Feit (SUNY Fredonia) 1B Colloquium: 19th Century: Hegel Chair: Rachel Cristy (Princeton University) Speaker: Caroline Bowman (New York University) “The Transition to Self-Consciousness in the Phenomenology of Spirit” Commentator: Daniel Mendez (Boston University) Speaker: Joris Spigt (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven) “The Finitude of Knowledge: Hegel and Sextus on Skepticism” Commentator: Jeffrey Kinlaw (McMurry University) 4 Monday Late Morning, 11:00 a.m.–1:00 p.m. 1C Colloquium: Ecology Chair: Raffaella De Rosa (Rutgers University Newark) Speaker: Oli Stephano (Vassar College) “Human Power and Ecological Flourishing: Refiguring Right and Advantage with Spinoza” Commentator: Hadley Cooney (University of Wisconsin–Madison) Speaker: Jonathan Kwan (The Graduate Center, CUNY) “An Eco-Political Conception of the People: An Account for Indigenous Communities” Commentator: Yarran Hominh (Columbia University) 1D Colloquium: Medieval Philosophy Chair: Mary Sirridge (Louisiana State University) Speaker: Michael Szlachta (University of Toronto) “A Challenge for Later Medieval Voluntarism” Commentator: Christina Van Arlig (Calvin College) Speaker: Milo Crimi (University of California, Los Angeles) “The Necessity of Consequences in Ockham and Buridan” Commentator: Nate Bulthuis (Colgate University) 1E Colloquium: Race and Language Chair: Lynne Tirrell (University of Connecticut) Speaker: Alek Willsey (University of Missouri) “An Illocutionary Model of Discursive Injustice” Commentator: Rose Lenehan (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) Speaker: Patrick O’Donnell (Johns Hopkins University) “When Code Words Aren’t Coded” Commentator: Rachel McKinney (University of Pittsburgh) 1F Symposium: A Theorem of Infinity for Principia Mathematica Chair: Russell Marcus (Hamilton College) Speaker: Landon D. C. Elkind (University of Iowa) Commentators: Bernie Linsky (University of Alberta) Allen Hazen (University of Alberta) 1G Symposium: Hume’s Purely Practical Response to Philosophical Skepticism Chair: Aaron Wilson (South Texas College) Speaker: Nathan Sasser (Greenville Technical College) Commentators: Anne Jacobson (Oxford University) Chris Lorkowski (Ashford University) 5 Monday Late Morning, 11:00 a.m.–1:00 p.m. (cont.) 1H Symposium: It’s My Model and I’ll Represent If I Want To Chair: Tobias Fuchs (Brown University) Speaker: Joshua Luczak (Leibniz Universität Hannover) Commentators: Jay Newhard (East Carolina University) Aaron Sullivan (University of Missouri) 1I Symposium: The Moral Parody Argument Against Panpsychism Chair: Pete Graham (University of Massachusetts Amherst) Speaker: Zach Blaesi (University of Texas at Austin) Commentators: Hedda Morch (New York University/University of Oslo) Louise Williams (University of Notre Dame) 1J Invited Symposium: Women Philosophers, 1600–1900: A Workshop Chair: Lydia Moland (Colby College) Speakers: Kristin Gjesdal (Temple University) Elizabeth Goodnick (Metropolitan State University Denver) 1K Symposium: What Basing Must Be Chair: Max Hayward (Bowling Green State University) Speaker: Christopher Blake-Turner (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) Commentators: Eric Wiland (University Missouri, St. Louis) Kurt Sylvan (University of Southampton) 1L Author Meets Critics: Michelle Kosch, Ficte’s Ethics Chair: TBA Critics: Jennifer Uleman (SUNY Purchase) Dieter Sturma (University of Bonn) Author: Michelle Kosch (Cornell University) 1M Invited Symposium: Thoreau and Philosophy Chair: John Lysaker (Emory University) Speakers: Branka Arsic (Columbia University) James Reid (Metropolitan State University of Denver) Commentator: John Kaag (University of Massachusetts Lowell) 6 Monday Late Morning, 11:00 a.m.–1:00 p.m. (cont.) AFFILIATED GROUP PROGRAM G1A Society for Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy Topic: Metaphysics and Language in the Jewish and Islamic Traditions Chair: Luis Xavier López-Farjeat (Universidad Panamericana) Speakers: Thérèse-Anne Druart (The Catholic University of America) “The Origin of Language in the Islamic Tradition” Lenn Goodman (Vanderbilt University) “Is There an Ontological Argument in al-Ghazali and Maimonides?” Stephen Ogden (Johns Hopkins University) “The Unity Argument in Averroes” (Winner of the SMRP Founder’s Award 2017) G1B Philosophy of the City Research Group Topic: Topics in Philosophy of the City (1 of 2) Chair: Sanna Lehtinen (University of Helsinki) Speakers: Michael Menser (Brooklyn College) “The Urban Commons: From Public-Private to Social-Public” Clair Revol (Université Grenoble Alpes) “‘Planetary Urbanisation’ and Emancipatory Urban Planning: Henri Lefebvre, Murray Bookchin, and Alberto Magnaghi” Lewis Gordon (University of Connecticut–Storrs) “Black Consciousness in Wakanda” Commentator: Michael Nagenborg (Universiteit Twente) G1C The International Society for Comparative Studies of Chinese and Western Philosophy Topic: Epistemology TBD 7 Monday Afternoon, 1:00–3:00 p.m. MONDAY AFTERNOON, 1:00–3:00 P.M. DIVISIONAL PROGRAM 2A Symposium: Degree of Pragmatic Subjectivity Predicts Degree of Semantic Subjectivity Chair: Francesco Pupa (Nassau Community College) Speaker: Sophia Sklaviadis (Tufts University) Commentators: Jonathan Phillips (Harvard University) Katharina Felka (University of Graz) Alex Steinberg (University of Bielefeld) 2B Colloquium: Determinism and Free Will I Chair: Bruce Galbreath (Independent Scholar) Speaker: Joel Archer (University of Notre Dame) “Solving the Rollback Argument Using Metaphysical Grounding” Commentator: Daniel Muñoz (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) Speaker: Jonah Nagashima (University of California, Riverside) “Semi-incompatibilism” Commentator: August Gorman (University of Southern
Recommended publications
  • The Onlife Manifesto Luciano Floridi Editor
    The Onlife Manifesto Luciano Floridi Editor The Onlife Manifesto Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era Editor Luciano Floridi Oxford Internet Institute University of Oxford Oxford, Oxfordshire United Kingdom Image made from models used to track debris in Earth orbit. Of the approximately 19,000 man-made objects larger than 10 centimetres in Earth orbit as of July 2009, most orbit close to the Earth. Source: NASA Earth Observatory / Orbital Debris Program Office: http://commons. wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Space_Debris_Low_Earth_Orbit.png original publication date 12 September 2009. ISBN 978-3-319-04092-9 ISBN 978-3-319-04093-6 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-04093-6 Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London Library of Congress Control Number: 2014948552 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and the Author(s) 2015. The book is published with open access at SpringerLink.com Open Access This book is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncom- mercial License, which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. This work is subject to copyright. All commercial rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publica- tion does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
    [Show full text]
  • The Religious Naturalism of William James: a New Interpretation Through the Lens of Liberal Naturalism
    Kent Academic Repository Full text document (pdf) Citation for published version Bunzl, Jacob Herbert (2019) The Religious Naturalism of William James: A New Interpretation Through the Lens of Liberal Naturalism. Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) thesis, University of Kent,. DOI Link to record in KAR https://kar.kent.ac.uk/81750/ Document Version UNSPECIFIED Copyright & reuse Content in the Kent Academic Repository is made available for research purposes. Unless otherwise stated all content is protected by copyright and in the absence of an open licence (eg Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher, author or other copyright holder. Versions of research The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record. Enquiries For any further enquiries regarding the licence status of this document, please contact: [email protected] If you believe this document infringes copyright then please contact the KAR admin team with the take-down information provided at http://kar.kent.ac.uk/contact.html 1 The Religious Naturalism of William James A New Interpretation Through the Lens of ‘Liberal Naturalism’ Jacob Herbert Bunzl Abstract: This thesis argues that recent developments in philosophical naturalism mandate a new naturalistic reading of James. To that end, it presents the first comprehensive reading of James through the lens of liberal rather than scientific naturalism. Chapter 1 offers an extensive survey of the varieties of philosophical naturalism that provides the conceptual tools required for the rest the thesis, and allows us to provisionally locate James within the field.
    [Show full text]
  • The Italian Cultural Institute in New York Announces
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE The Italian Cultural Institute in New York announces an International Conference ON THE ASHES OF POST-MODERNISM: A NEW REALISM Initiative of the Framework Program “Slowness and Quality” promoted by La Fondazione (NYC) Sponsored by Alitalia Italian Cultural Institute, New York Monday November 7, 2011 9:50am – 5:20pm NY, November 7, 2011 The recent years of economic crisis and geopolitical transformations have led post- modernism to a critical point. Tenets such as the one that reality is socially constructed and ceaselessly modifiable, and that truth and objectivity are untenable notions are increasingly showing signs of rejection by a growing number of thinkers. The “facts” cannot be reduced to interpretations and strike back claiming a “new realism”. World famous public intellectuals Umberto Eco and Hilary Putnam and prominent philosophers Akeel Bilgrami, Giovanna Borradori , Ned Block, Paul Boghossian , Petar Bojanic, Mario De Caro, Maurizio Ferraris, Markus Gabriel, Alvin Goldman, Armando Massarenti and Riccardo Viale will discuss the return of “strong” ideas after decades of “weak” thinking. Implications are not only logical, ontological, and epistemological, but also widely social, psychological, and ethical. Umberto Eco (born 5 January 1932) is an Italian expert of semiotics, essayist, philosopher, literary critic, and novelist, best known for his novel “The Name of the Rose” (Il Nome della Rosa, 1980), an intellectual mystery combining semiotics in fiction, biblical analysis, medieval studies and literary theory. He has also written academic texts, children's books and many essays. Eco is the founder of the Dipartimento di Comunicazione at the Università di San Marino , President of the Scuola Superiore di Studi Umanistici, Università di Bologna , member of the Accademia dei Lincei (since November 2010) and an Honorary Fellow of Kellogg College, University of Oxford .
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy of Language
    Philosophy OF Language Julian J. Schlöder, University OF AmsterDAM YEREVAN Academy FOR Linguistics AND Philosophy 2019 1 = 99 William Lycan, (Routledge, 3rD ed, 2019). ◦ Philosophy OF Language ◦ Stephen Yablo, LecturE NOTES ON Philosophy OF Language. > https: //ocw.mit.edu/courses/linguistics-and-philosophy/ 24-251-introduction-to-philosophy-of-language-fall-2011/ lecture-notes/ Jeff Speaks, (StanforD Encyclopedia OF ◦ Theories OF Meaning Philosophy). > https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/meaning 2 = 99 Language IS . ◦ REMARKABLE 3 = 99 ArE Pringles POTATO chips? 4 = 99 ◦ The British COURTS SPEND SOME TWO YEARS ON THAT question. > At STAKE WAS SOME £100 MILLION IN TAXes. Yes! A Pringle IS “MADE FROM POTATO ◦ The VAT AND Duties Tribunal: flOUR IN THE SENSE THAT ONE CANNOT SAY THAT IT IS NOT MADE FROM POTATO flour.” No! Pringles CONTAIN “A NUMBER OF ◦ The High Court OF Justice: SIGNIfiCANT INGREDIENTS” AND “CANNOT BE SAID TO BE ‘MADE OF’ ONE OF them.” TheY DO NOT EXHIBIT “POTATONESS”. (TheY ARE MORE LIKE BREAD THAN LIKE chips.) : Yes! The TEST FOR “POTATONESS” IS AN ◦ The Court OF Appeal “Aristotelian QUESTION” ABOUT “ESSENCE” AND THE COURT HAS “NO REAL IDEA” OF WHAT THAT means. Rather, THE QUESTION “WOULD PROBABLY BE ANSWERED IN A MORE RELEVANT AND SENSIBLE WAY BY A CHILD CONSUMER THAN BY A FOOD SCIENTIST OR A CULINARY pendant.” 5 = 99 THE QUESTIONS ◦ Fact: WORDS AND SENTENCES HAVE MEANINGSOR ARE MEANINGFUL. ◦ Fact: NOT ALL SEQUENCES OF sounds/letters ARE meaningful. ◦ But WHAT ARE meanings? Alternatively: WHAT IS meaningfulness? ◦ HoW DO LINGUISTIC ITEMS RELATE TO meanings? (And WHY DO SOME ITEMS FAIL TO RELATE TO meanings?) ◦ IN WHAT RELATIONS DO humans, LANGUAGES AND MEANINGS stand? 6 = 99 MEANING FACTS HerE ARE SOME THINGS THAT WE KNOW ABOUT meanings, WHATEVER THEY ARe.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE KATALIN BALOG Department of Philosophy University-Newark 175 University Ave., Newark, NJ 07102 Rutgers Home
    CURRICULUM VITAE KATALIN BALOG Department of Philosophy University-Newark 175 University Ave., Newark, NJ 07102 Rutgers Home page: http://hypatiaonhudson.net/ Email: [email protected] Education and work history 2018- present – professor, Rutgers University – Newark. 2010- 2018 – associate professor, Rutgers University – Newark. 2006- 2010 – associate professor, Yale University. 2000-2006 – assistant professor, Yale University. 1998-1999 – Mellon postdoctoral fellow, Cornell University. 1998 – Ph.D. Philosophy, Rutgers University. Ph.D. Thesis Director: Brian Loar Conceivability and Consciousness* Degree obtained: October 1998 *My dissertation was selected by Robert Nozick for publication in the series Harvard Dissertations in Philosophy. Areas of specialization Philosophy of mind Philosophy of psychology/cognitive science Free will and personal identity Metaphysics Value theory Buddhist philosophy Publications Forthcoming: 1. Either/Or: Subjectivity, Objectivity and Value (pdf). In: Transformative Experience: New Philosophical Essays, eds. Enoch Lambert and John Schwenkler, Oxford University Press (UK), 2020. 2. Disillusioned (pdf). Journal of Consciousness Studies 27 (1-2), 2020. Published: 3. Hard, Harder, Hardest (pdf), in Sensations, Thoughts, Langugage: Essays in Honor of Brian Loar (pp. 265-289), Arthur Sullivan (ed.), Routledge Festschrifts in Philosophy, Routledge, 2020. 4. Consciousness and Meaning; Selected Essays by Brian Loar, Oxford University Press, 2017. (Editor, Introduction to Loar’s Philosophy of Mind, pp. 137-152) pdf. 5. Illusionism’s Discontent (pdf). Journal of Consciousness Studies, 23(11-12), 40-51, 2016. 6. Acquaintance and the Mind-Body Problem (pdf).In Christopher Hill and Simone Gozzano (Eds.), New Perspectives on Type Identity: The Mental and the Physical (pp. 16-43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. 7. In Defense of the Phenomenal Concept Strategy (pdf).
    [Show full text]
  • APA Eastern Division 2019 Annual Meeting Program
    The American Philosophical Association EASTERN DIVISION ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH ANNUAL MEETING PROGRAM SHERATON NEW YORK TIMES SQUARE NEW YORK, NEW YORK JANUARY 7 – 10, 2019 Visit our table at APA Eastern OFFERING A 20% (PB) / 40% (HC) DISCOUNT WITH FREE SHIPPING TO THE CONTIGUOUS U.S. FOR ORDERS PLACED AT THE CONFERENCE. THE POETRY OF APPROACHING HEGEL’S LOGIC, GEORGES BATAILLE OBLIQUELY Georges Bataille Melville, Molière, Beckett Translated and with an Introduction by Angelica Nuzzo Stuart Kendall THE POLITICS OF PARADIGMS ZHUANGZI AND THE Thomas S. Kuhn, James B. Conant, BECOMING OF NOTHINGNESS and the Cold War “Struggle for David Chai Men’s Minds” George A. Reisch ANOTHER AVAILABLE APRIL 2019 WHITE MAN’S BURDEN Josiah Royce’s Quest for a Philosophy THE REAL METAPHYSICAL CLUB of white Racial Empire The Philosophers, Their Debates, and Tommy J. Curry Selected Writings from 1870 to 1885 Frank X. Ryan, Brian E. Butler, and BOUNDARY LINES James A. Good, editors Philosophy and Postcolonialism Introduction by John R. Shook Emanuela Fornari AVAILABLE MARCH 2019 Translated by Iain Halliday Foreword by Étienne Balibar PRAGMATISM APPLIED William James and the Challenges THE CUDGEL AND THE CARESS of Contemporary Life Reflections on Cruelty and Tenderness Clifford S. Stagoll and David Farrell Krell Michael P. Levine, editors AVAILABLE MARCH 2019 AVAILABLE APRIL 2019 LOVE AND VIOLENCE BUDDHIST FEMINISMS The Vexatious Factors of Civilization AND FEMININITIES Lea Melandri Karma Lekshe Tsomo, editor Translated by Antonio Calcagno www.sunypress.edu II IMPORTANT NOTICES FOR MEETING ATTENDEES SESSION LOCATIONS Please note: this online version of the program does not include session locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Abstract the Summer Program for Diversity in Logic for Undergraduates Builds Upon the PIKSI Summer Program Model, Focusi
    Project Abstract The Summer Program for Diversity in Logic for Undergraduates builds upon the PIKSI Summer Program Model, focusing on Logic, an area in philosophy needing to increase diversity. We request seed funding for the pilot run of the program in May of 2016, when we will offer 12 students the opportunity to explore an exciting research theme in Logic –Paradoxes—receive small-group tutoring in formal techniques, receive mentoring and support for professionalization, experience validation, understanding and advice regarding diversity issues they have encountered –sexism, racism, ableism (and which the students may worry about encountering them in the profession), and develop a sense of community with students and faculty with whom they can identify and, in turn, come to strengthen their own identities. Project Purpose Our goal is to empower students to conceive of themselves as aspiring logicians, philosophers of logic and formal philosophers who belong in our profession. As Audrey Yap has noted, a majority of philosophy majors encounter some logic as a part of their undergraduate curriculum. Increasing diversity in logic is not simply a problem of exposure, but concretely addressing underlying pressures women and minority students experience, particularly stereotype threat and pernicious ideas about “natural aptitude.” (1) These pressures are especially strong in the subfield of logic, where almost no women and minorities have contributed to the research literature until very recently, and women and minorities remain underrepresented to a higher degree than in philosophy more broadly. Women and minorities learning logic can be vulnerable to feeling that a field like logic, that tends to be male and white dominated on the whole, is not welcoming to them.
    [Show full text]
  • On Physical Multiple Realization
    ON PHYSICAL MULTIPLE REALIZATION BY RONALD P. ENDICOTT Perhaps no argument has done more to set the direction of contemporary philosophy of mind than the “multiple realizability argument.” First championed by Hilary Putnam and later reformulated by Jerry Fodor, the argument begins with the observation that a given psychological property can be realized by any number of diverse physical systems, and then ends with the conclusion that psychological properties are irreducible vis-à-vis the physical sciences.^ Its target, in other words, is type physicalism and the unity of science, as traditionally conceived. According to one popular criticism, however, the multiple realizability argument has been discredited by the fact that physical properties are also multiply realized} But this, I believe, is a mistake. While the criticism does serve to bring a number of important issues into better focus, it can be shown that the facts about physical multiple realization are perfectly consistent with the Putnam-Fodor style argument, and that, when such facts are rightly understood, they do not vitiate the original point about the irreducibility of psychological properties. /. Multiple Realization In spite of much talk about multiple realization, philosophers have generally been content to leave this central concept unanalyzed. I shall try to remedy this situation by indicating the two most salient features of the concept. First, there is the idea that a property is realized by a number of diverse states, which I take to mean that different state types can provide lawfully sufficient conditions for the instantiation of the multiply realized property. And second, there is the idea that among this range of diverse Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 70 (1989) 212-224 0279-0750/89/0300-0212 $01.30 Copyright © 1989 University of Southern California ON PHYSICAL MULTIPLE REALIZATION 213 states, there are no lawfully necessary and sufficient conditions for the instantiation of that property.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Sense for Concurrency and Strong Paraconsistency Using Unstratified Inference and Reflection
    Published in ArXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/0812.4852 http://commonsense.carlhewitt.info Common sense for concurrency and strong paraconsistency using unstratified inference and reflection Carl Hewitt http://carlhewitt.info This paper is dedicated to John McCarthy. Abstract Unstratified Reflection is the Norm....................................... 11 Abstraction and Reification .............................................. 11 This paper develops a strongly paraconsistent formalism (called Direct Logic™) that incorporates the mathematics of Diagonal Argument .......................................................... 12 Computer Science and allows unstratified inference and Logical Fixed Point Theorem ........................................... 12 reflection using mathematical induction for almost all of Disadvantages of stratified metatheories ........................... 12 classical logic to be used. Direct Logic allows mutual Reification Reflection ....................................................... 13 reflection among the mutually chock full of inconsistencies Incompleteness Theorem for Theories of Direct Logic ..... 14 code, documentation, and use cases of large software systems Inconsistency Theorem for Theories of Direct Logic ........ 15 thereby overcoming the limitations of the traditional Tarskian Consequences of Logically Necessary Inconsistency ........ 16 framework of stratified metatheories. Concurrency is the Norm ...................................................... 16 Gödel first formalized and proved that it is not possible
    [Show full text]
  • Acceder a INSOMNIA Nº
    7 AÑO 16 - Nº 182 - FEBRERO 2013 The Little Green God of Agony El cuento de Stephen King llevado al cómic por Dennis Calero HAVEN - THE BOOGEYMAN - 22/11/63 - SUPERHÉROES EN EL MUNDO KING - FARSCAPE - DAVID JASSO Nº 182 - FEBRERO 2013 PORTADA Dedicamos la nota de portada de THE LITTLE GREEN GOD este número a la reciente OF AGONY EDITORIAL adaptación al cómic de Little Green God of Agony, un relato (inédito Un gran cuento de NOTICIAS para la mayoría de los lectores) que Stephen King CÓMICS Stephen King... llevado al cómic INFORME PÁG. 3 Durante el pasado mes de octubre, se publicó en el sitio HAVEN oficial de Stephen King la OPINIÓN adaptación al cómic del relato The Little Green God of Agony, de ORTOMETRAJES • El camino a Pet Sematary, C forma gratuita. Además de contado en un documental TROS UNDOS aplaudir la iniciativa, que permite O M • Guns, un nuevo ebook de Stephen que todos los lectores disfruten King sobre las armas FICCIÓN de esta historia, es el momento • Toda la información actualizada de analizar la misma. Stephen ENTREVISTA del mundo de los dollar babies King publicó este cuento en la • Comienza a tomar forma el elenco CONTRATAPA antología A Book of Horrors de la esperada miniserie Under the (2011), de Stephen Jones. Luego Dome también fue incluido en The Best • Stephen King llega a Facebook Horror of the Year, Volume Four, editada por Ellen Datlow. Cuenta ... y otras noticias la historia, desde el punto de PÁG. 4 vista de la enfermera, de un millonario parapléjico. PÁG.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy: Third Edition Robert Audi & Paul Audi Frontmatter More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-01505-0 - The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy: Third Edition Robert Audi & Paul Audi Frontmatter More information THE CAMBRIDGE DICTIONARY OF PHILOSOPHY THIRD EDITION This is the most comprehensive dictionary of philosophical terms and thinkers available in English. Previously acclaimed as the most author- itative and accessible dictionary of philosophy in any language, it has been widely translated and has served both professional philosophers and students of philosophy worldwide. Written by a team of more than 550 experts – including more than 100 new to this third edition – the dictionary contains approximately 5,000 entries ranging from short definitions to full-length articles. It concisely defines terms, concretely illustrates ideas, and informatively describes philosophers. It is designed to facilitate the understanding of philosophy at all levels and in all fields. Key features of this third edition: Some 500 new entries covering both Eastern and Western philosophy, as well as individual countries such as China, France, Germany, Italy, and Spain Increased coverage of such growing fields as ethics and philosophy of mind Scores of new intellectual portraits of leading contemporary thinkers Wider coverage of Continental philosophy Dozens of new concepts in cognitive science and other areas Enhanced cross-referencing to add context and to increase under- standing Expansions of both text and index to facilitate research and browsing Robert Audi is John A. O’Brien Professor of Philosophy at the University of Notre Dame. He is the author of numerous books and articles. His recent books include Moral Perception (2013); Democratic Authority and the Separation of Church and State (2011); Rationality and Religious Commitment (2011); Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge (2010); and Moral Value and Human Diversity (2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Of the American Philosophical Association Apa the AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL ASSOCIATION
    January 2006 Volume 79, Issue 3 Proceedings and Addresses of The American Philosophical Association apa THE AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL ASSOCIATION Pacific Division Program University of Delaware Newark, DE 19716 www.apaonline.org Pacific Intro.indd 1 1/3/2006 2:28:33 PM The American Philosophical Association Pacific Division Eightieth Annual Meeting Host Institutions: Lewis and Clark College Reed College University of Portland The Portland Hilton Portland, OR March 22 - 26, 2006 Pacific Intro.indd 3 1/3/2006 2:28:33 PM Proceedings and Addresses of The American Philosophical Association Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association (ISSN 0065-972X) is published five times each year and is distributed to members of the APA as a benefit of membership and to libraries, departments, and institutions for $75 per year. It is published by The American Philosophical Association, 31 Amstel Ave., University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716. Second-Class Postage Paid at Newark, DE and additional mailing offices. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to Proceedings and Addresses, The American Philosophical Association, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716. Editor: William E. Mann Phone: (302) 831-1112 Publications Coordinator: Erin Shepherd Fax: (302) 831-8690 Associate Editor: Anita Silvers Web: www.apaonline.org Meeting Coordinator: Linda Smallbrook Proceedings and Addresses of The American Philosophical Association, the major publication of The American Philosophical Association, is published five times each academic year in the months of September, November, January, February, and May. Each annual volume contains the programs for the meetings of the three Divisions; the membership list; Presidential Addresses; news of the Association, its Divisions and Committees, and announcements of interest to philosophers.
    [Show full text]