DOCSLIB.ORG

Pinyon Jay Monitoring Program for New Mexico

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pinyon Jay Monitoring Program for New Mexico Pinyon Jay Monitoring Program for New Mexico Photo Nathan Petersen Nathan Petersen, Kristine Johnson, and Jacqueline Smith Natural Heritage New Mexico, UNM Biology Department Natural Heritage New Mexico Publication No. GTR-14-382 December 2014 Contents Table of Figures .............................................................................................................................. 3 Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Methods........................................................................................................................................... 6 Data Mining ................................................................................................................................ 6 Field Work ................................................................................................................................ 10 Results ........................................................................................................................................... 11 Data Mining .............................................................................................................................. 11 Colony Search ........................................................................................................................... 12 Protocol Assessment ................................................................................................................. 15 Discussion ..................................................................................................................................... 16 Protocol Assessment ................................................................................................................. 16 Survey Results ........................................................................................................................... 17 Protocol for Monitoring Pinyon Jays ............................................................................................ 19 Introduction to Pinyon Jay Biology .......................................................................................... 19 Procedures for Field Surveys .................................................................................................... 24 Appendix 1. Monitoring Sites Located in 2014 ............................................................................ 25 Bear Mountains ......................................................................................................................... 25 Cooney ...................................................................................................................................... 30 Crow Mesa ................................................................................................................................ 32 Driveway ................................................................................................................................... 34 El Calderon ............................................................................................................................... 36 Mesa Penistaja .......................................................................................................................... 38 Point of Rocks ........................................................................................................................... 40 Rawhide..................................................................................................................................... 42 Appendix 2. Pinyon Jay 2014 survey sites, site rank, and survey results. .................................... 44 Acknowledgments......................................................................................................................... 45 Literature Cited ............................................................................................................................. 45 2 Table of Figures Figure 1. Summary of eBird sightings of Pinyon Jays, 2004-2013. ............................................... 8 Figure 2. Pinyon Jay observations on BBS routes,1997-2013........................................................ 9 Figure 3. Pinyon Jay definite and probable colony sites. ............................................................. 13 Figure 4. Pinyon Jay potential colony areas and areas of interest for future survey. ................... 14 Figure 5. Pinyon Jay nest showing nest depth and substantial construction. ............................... 21 Figure 6. Pinyon Jay nest showing juniper bark lining. ................................................................ 21 Figure 7. Western Scrub-Jay nest showing shallow cup and grass/root lining. ............................ 22 Figure 8. Northern Mockingbird nest showing smaller size and less substantial structure. ......... 22 Figure 9. Northern Mockingbird nest showing less substantial structure and thin, rootlet lining. 23 Figure 10, American Robin nest showing incorporation of grasses, fur, paper, mud. ................. 23 Figure 11. Bear Mountains colony site. ........................................................................................ 27 Figure 12. Cerro Colorado colony site. ......................................................................................... 29 Figure 13. Cooney colony site. ..................................................................................................... 31 Figure 14. Crow Mesa colony site. ............................................................................................... 33 Figure 15. Driveway colony site. .................................................................................................. 35 Figure 16. El Calderon colony site. .............................................................................................. 37 Figure 17. Mesa Penistaja colony site. .......................................................................................... 39 Figure 18. Point of Rocks colony site. .......................................................................................... 41 Figure 19. Rawhide colony site. ................................................................................................... 43 3 Abstract To develop a monitoring program for Pinyon Jays in New Mexico, we gathered data on recent Pinyon Jay occurrences. Data sources included word of mouth from agency biologists, researchers, people with feeders, and birdwatchers; BBS data; eBird data; New Mexico Ornithological Society data; and specimen data from the Museum of Southwestern Biology. We assigned priority ranks to potential Pinyon Jay colony sites, based on multiple sightings during the breeding season, plentiful public land, ease of access, and location. During April and May 2014, we surveyed the highest-priority colony sites. In addition to locations that were identified for searching beforehand, we searched other areas opportunistically. When driving to or from a predetermined search area, or when time permitted, we also searched suitable habitat on public land. We found nine definite Pinyon Jay colonies, four probable colony sites, eight potential colony sites, and five areas of interest where Pinyon Jays likely nest. We tested our survey protocol using known colonies and concluded that three visits to each known colony site are usually sufficient to detect an active nesting colony. Based on these surveys and our experience studying Pinyon Jays in the field, we created a monitoring protocol for Pinyon Jays in New Mexico, included in this report. We recommend that experienced Pinyon Jay researchers conduct monitoring and any inexperienced surveyors receive thorough training in detecting breeding behavior, finding nests, and distinguishing Pinyon Jay nests from those of other species. 4 Introduction The USGS Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) reports that Pinyon Jay (Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus) populations survey-wide and in New Mexico have been declining steadily for over 40 years (Sauer et al. 2014). Due to concerns about the species’ status, the Pinyon Jay is currently classified as a New Mexico BLM Sensitive Species, DoD Partners in Flight (PIF) priority species (DoD PIF 2011), New Mexico PIF Level 1 Species of Concern (NMPIF 2007), and New Mexico Species of Greatest Conservation Need (New Mexico Department of Game and Fish 2006). Pinyon Jays are year-round residents in pinyon-juniper (Pinus edulis, P. monophylla, P. cembroides, Juniperus spp.) habitats across the southwestern US. They also occur in Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, and central Oregon, where they inhabit woodlands and scrublands containing ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa), juniper, and chaparral vegetation (Balda 2002). They nest colonially and breed (sometimes cooperatively) on traditional nesting grounds. Pinyon jays are omnivorous, taking pine seeds, acorns, juniper berries, arthropods, and small vertebrates, but they especially depend on the seeds of pinyon pines. With their ability to carry up to 50 pinyon seeds at a time, Pinyon Jays are the main long-distance seed disperser for pinyon trees. In return for seed dispersal services, the trees provide mast crops of abundant, highly nutritional seeds. Cached seeds sustain Pinyon Jays over winter, support successful nesting, and strongly influence the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Behavioral Profiles
    Terra Explorer Volume 1 The Terra Explorer series is copyrighted © 2009 by William James Davis. All rights reserved. Copyrights of individual stories in- cluded in the last section of the book, “Adventures in the field,” belong to their respective authors. (see following page for more details) William James Davis, Ph.D. Copyright © 2009 by Wm. James Davis ISBN 978-0-9822654-0-6 0-9822654-0-9 Also available as an eBook. To order, visit: http://www.TerraNat.com The Terra Explorer series is copyrighted © 2009 by William James Davis. All rights reserved. Copyrights of individual stories included in the last section of the book, “Adventures in the field,” belong to their respective authors. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission from the publisher and respective authors, except in the case of brief quotations embedded in critical articles and reviews. Contact the publisher to request permis- sion by visiting www.terranat.com. Photos on the front and back covers (Black Skimmer and Cuban Anole, respec- tively) by Karen Anthonisen Finch. For Linda Jeanne Mealey, who inspired my dreams to explore the natural world. Also by William James Davis Australian Birds: A guide and resource for interpreting behavior TableTable of of contents contents Introduction Evolution of a concept The challenge Book’s organization and video projects Participating in the Terra Explorer Project Behavioral profiles 8 Common Loon 11 American White Pelican 14 Anhinga 17 Cattle Egret 20 Mallard 23 Bald Eagle 26
    [Show full text]
  • The Cognitive Animal Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives on Animal Cognition
    This PDF includes a chapter from the following book: The Cognitive Animal Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives on Animal Cognition © 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology License Terms: Made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ OA Funding Provided By: The open access edition of this book was made possible by generous funding from Arcadia—a charitable fund of Lisbet Rausing and Peter Baldwin. The title-level DOI for this work is: doi:10.7551/mitpress/1885.001.0001 Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/books/edited-volume/chapter-pdf/677490/9780262268028_c001600.pdf by guest on 29 September 2021 17 Spatial and Social Cognition in Corvids: An Evolutionary Approach Russell P. Balda and Alan C. Kamil research plan using controlled laboratory ex- Research Questions periments and captive birds. Fortunately, nut- crackers are quite willing to cache and recover The central research questions that have guided seeds in laboratory settings and do so with a high our studies since 1981 combine issues and tech- degree of accuracy, both in a sandy floor indoors niques from both comparative psychology and (Balda 1980; Balda and Turek 1984) or out of avian ecology. Most of our questions originate doors (Vander Wall 1982), as well as in a room from the cognitive implications of extensive field with a raised floor containing sand-filled cups as studies on the natural history, ecology, and potential cache sites (Kamil and Balda 1985). behavior of seed-caching corvids. Because our The ability to study caching and cache recovery questions have evolved as our studies progressed, under controlled laboratory conditions allowed we have chosen to give a historical perspective us to test hypotheses on how the nutcrackers find outlining the progression of our ideas and ques- their caches.
    [Show full text]
  • Pines in the Arboretum
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MtJ ARBORETUM REVIEW No. 32-198 PETER C. MOE Pines in the Arboretum Pines are probably the best known of the conifers native to The genus Pinus is divided into hard and soft pines based on the northern hemisphere. They occur naturally from the up­ the hardness of wood, fundamental leaf anatomy, and other lands in the tropics to the limits of tree growth near the Arctic characteristics. The soft or white pines usually have needles in Circle and are widely grown throughout the world for timber clusters of five with one vascular bundle visible in cross sec­ and as ornamentals. In Minnesota we are limited by our cli­ tions. Most hard pines have needles in clusters of two or three mate to the more cold hardy species. This review will be with two vascular bundles visible in cross sections. For the limited to these hardy species, their cultivars, and a few hy­ discussion here, however, this natural division will be ignored brids that are being evaluated at the Arboretum. and an alphabetical listing of species will be used. Where neces­ Pines are readily distinguished from other common conifers sary for clarity, reference will be made to the proper groups by their needle-like leaves borne in clusters of two to five, of particular species. spirally arranged on the stem. Spruce (Picea) and fir (Abies), Of the more than 90 species of pine, the following 31 are or for example, bear single leaves spirally arranged. Larch (Larix) have been grown at the Arboretum. It should be noted that and true cedar (Cedrus) bear their leaves in a dense cluster of many of the following comments and recommendations are indefinite number, whereas juniper (Juniperus) and arborvitae based primarily on observations made at the University of (Thuja) and their related genera usually bear scalelikie or nee­ Minnesota Landscape Arboretum, and plant performance dlelike leaves that are opposite or borne in groups of three.
    [Show full text]
  • Clark's Nutcracker Factsheet 6: Population Trends
    United States Department of Agriculture D E E Forest Service A Monitoring Challenge: P R A R U TM U LT ENT OF AGRIC Pacific Northwest Region Clark’s Nutcracker Population Trends 2011 ARE CLARK’S nutcrackers declining? Many resource What’s the current status How reliable are the managers think so, yet long-term national surveys say no. of Clark’s nutcrackers? surveys? Problem is, these birds are so hard to monitor. How can we improve on methods to accurately detect changes in Clark’s Breeding Bird Surveys These annual bird counts nutcracker populations? (conducted nationwide have limitations for projecting each May since 1966) show population trends in Clark’s a significant range-wide nutcrackers for several BACKGROUND increase in numbers of reasons: We investigated habitat use, caching behavior, and Clark’s nutcrackers from 1966 • Most routes are along migratory patterns in Clark’s nutcrackers in the Pacific through 2007. Christmas Bird established roads to Northwest using radio telemetry. Over 4 years (2006– Counts (done in December facilitate access by 2009), we captured 54 adult nutcrackers at 10 sites in the across the country since 1900) volunteer surveyors; Cascade and Olympic Mountains in Washington State. show fairly strong population species occupying remote We fitted nutcrackers with a back-pack style harness. fluctuations, but no overall terrain, like Clark’s The battery life on the radio tags was 450 days, and trend (either increasing or nutcrackers, might be we tracked nutcrackers year-round, on foot (to obtain decreasing). Data from these poorly sampled. behavior observations) and via aircraft (to obtain point annual surveys (shown in the • Clark’s nutcrackers breed locations).
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest NM Publication List
    Southwest New Mexico Publication Inventory Draft Source of Document/Search Purchase Topic Category Keywords County Title Author Date Publication/Journal/Publisher Type of Document Method Price Geology 1 Geology geology, seismic Southwestern NM Six regionally extensive upper-crustal Ackermann, H.D., L.W. 1994 U.S. Geological Survey, Open-File Report 94- Electronic file USGS publication search refraction profiles, seismic refraction profiles in Southwest New Pankratz, D.P. Klein 695 (DJVU) http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/usgspubs/ southwestern New Mexico ofr/ofr94695 Mexico, 2 Geology Geology, Southwestern NM Magmatism and metamorphism at 1.46 Ga in Amato, J.M., A.O. 2008 In New Mexico Geological Society Fall Field Paper in Book http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/g $45.00 magmatism, the Burro Mountains, southwestern New Boullion, and A.E. Conference Guidebook - 59, Geology of the Gila uidebooks/59/ metamorphism, Mexico Sanders Wilderness-Silver City area, 107-116. Burro Mountains, southwestern New Mexico 3 Geology Geology, mineral Catron County Geology and mineral resources of York Anderson, O.J. 1986 New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Electronic file (PDF) NMBGMR search $10.00 for resources, York Ranch SE quadrangle, Cibola and Catron Resources Open File Report 220A, 22 pages. <http://geoinfo.nmt.edu/publicatio CD Ranch, Fence Counties, New Mexico ns/openfile/details.cfml?Volume=2 Lake, Catron, 20A> Cibola 4 Geology Geology, Zuni Salt Catron County Geology of the Zuni Salt Lake 7 1/2 Minute Anderson, O.J. 1994 New Mexico Bureau of Mines and
    [Show full text]
  • Magpie Jay General Information and Care
    Magpie Jay General Information and Care: Black Throated Magpie Jays (Calocitta colliei) and White Throated Magpie Jay (Calocitta formosa) are the only two species in their genus. Black Throated Magpie Jays are endemic to Northwestern Mexico. The range of White Throated Magpie Jays lies to the south, overlapping with Black Throats slightly in the Mexican states of Jalisco and Colima, and running into Costa Rica. Both of these birds are members of the family Corvidae. Magpie Jays are energetic, highly intelligent animals and need to be kept in a large planted aviary - not just a cage. These birds are highly social and are commonly found in the wild as cooperative nesters. They are omnivores and favor a great variety of fruits, insects, small rodents, and nuts. A captive diet that works well in my aviaries is a basic pellet low iron softbill diet such as Kaytee’s Exact Original Low Iron Maintenance Formula for Toucans, Mynas and other Softbills. A bowl of this is in the cage at all times and is supplemented with nuts, fruits and veggies like apples, papaya, grapes, oranges, peas and carrots and the occasional treat of small mice and insects like meal worms, crickets, megaworms, and waxworms are relished by the birds. Extra protein is essential if you want these birds to breed. Fresh water should always be provided. I use a shallow three to four inch deep, twelve inch wide crock the birds can drink from and bath in. The birds you are receiving from my aviaries are hand fed and closed banded. How recently they were weaned will affect how tame they are at first.
    [Show full text]
  • S Largest Islands: Scenarios for the Role of Corvid Seed Dispersal
    Received: 21 June 2017 | Accepted: 31 October 2017 DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.13041 RESEARCH ARTICLE Oak habitat recovery on California’s largest islands: Scenarios for the role of corvid seed dispersal Mario B. Pesendorfer1,2† | Christopher M. Baker3,4,5† | Martin Stringer6 | Eve McDonald-Madden6 | Michael Bode7 | A. Kathryn McEachern8 | Scott A. Morrison9 | T. Scott Sillett2 1Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, USA; 2Migratory Bird Center, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Washington, DC, USA; 3School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia; 4School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, Qld, Australia; 5CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, Ecosciences Precinct, Brisbane, Qld, Australia; 6School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, Qld, Australia; 7ARC Centre for Excellence for Coral Reefs Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld, Australia; 8U.S. Geological Survey- Western Ecological Research Center, Channel Islands Field Station, Ventura, CA, USA and 9The Nature Conservancy, San Francisco, CA, USA Correspondence Mario B. Pesendorfer Abstract Email: [email protected] 1. Seed dispersal by birds is central to the passive restoration of many tree communi- Funding information ties. Reintroduction of extinct seed dispersers can therefore restore degraded for- The Nature Conservancy; Smithsonian ests and woodlands. To test this, we constructed a spatially explicit simulation Institution; U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), Grant/Award Number: DEB-1256394; model, parameterized with field data, to consider the effect of different seed dis- Australian Reseach Council; Science and persal scenarios on the extent of oak populations. We applied the model to two Industry Endowment Fund of Australia islands in California’s Channel Islands National Park (USA), one of which has lost a Handling Editor: David Mateos Moreno key seed disperser.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bird in Our Hand: Weighing Uncertainty About the Past Against Uncertainty About the Future in Channel Islands National Park
    A Bird in Our Hand: Weighing Uncertainty about the Past against Uncertainty about the Future in Channel Islands National Park Scott A. Morrison Introduction Climate change threatens many species and ecosystems. It also challenges managers of protected areas to adapt traditional approaches for setting conservation goals, and the phil- osophical and policy framework they use to guide management decisions (Cole and Yung 2010). A growing literature discusses methods for structuring management decisions in the face of climate-related uncertainty and risk (e.g., Polasky et al. 2011). It is often unclear, how- ever, when managers should undertake such explicit decision-making processes. Given that not making a decision is actually a decision with potentially important implications, what should trigger management decision-making when threats are foreseeable but not yet mani- fest? Conservation planning for the island scrub-jay (Aphelocoma insularis) may warrant a near-term decision about non-traditional management interventions, and so presents a rare, specific case study in how managers assess uncertainty, risk, and urgency in the context of climate change. The jay is restricted to Santa Cruz Island, one of the five islands within Chan- nel Islands National Park (CINP) off the coast of southern California, USA. The species also once occurred on neighboring islands, though it is not known when or why those populations went extinct. The population currently appears to be stable, but concerns about long-term viability of jays on Santa Cruz Island have raised the question of whether a population of jays should be re-established on one of those neighboring islands, Santa Rosa.
    [Show full text]
  • Geohydrology of the San Agustin Basin, Alamosa Creek Basin
    Geohydrology of the San Agustin Basin, Alamosa Creek Basin upstream from Monticello Box, and upper Gila Basin in parts of Catron, Socorro, and Sierra Counties, New Mexico By R.G. Myers, J.T. Everheart, and C.A. Wilson U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-RESOURCES INVESTIGATIONS REPORT 94-4125 Prepared in cooperation with the NEW MEXICO STATE ENGINEER OFFICE Albuquerque, New Mexico 1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For additional information Copies of this report can write to: be purchased from: U.S. Geological Survey District Chief Earth Science Information Center U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Reports Section Water Resources Division Box 25286, MS 517 4501 Indian School Rd. NE, Suite 200 Denver Federal Center Albuquerque, New Mexico 87110 Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract.................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction........................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and scope...................................................................................................................... 3 Location and extent.................................................................................................................... 3 Ctimate....................................^ 3 Previous hydrologic investigations.........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 Pinyon-Juniper Woodlands
    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. Chapter 6 Pinyon-Juniper Woodlands Gerald J. Gottfried, USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Flagstaff, Arizona Thomas W. Swetnam, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona Craig D. Allen, USDI National Biological Service, Los,Alamos, New Mexico Julio L. Betancourt, USDI Geological Survey, Tucson, Arizona Alice L. Chung-MacCoubrey, USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Albuquerque, New Mexico INTRODUCTION system management generally is accepted, the USDA Forest Service, other public land management agen­ Pinyon-juniper woodlands are one of the largest cies, American Indian tribes, and private landown­ ecosystems in the Southwest and in the Middle Rio ers may have differing definitions of what constitutes Grande Basin (Fig. 1). The woodlands have been desired conditions. important to the region's inhabitants since prehis­ Key questions about the pinyon-juniper ecosys­ toric times for a variety of natural resources and tems remain unanswered. Some concern the basic amenities. The ecosystems have not been static; their dynamics of biological and physical components of distributions, stand characteristics, and site condi­ the pinyon-juniper ecosystems. Others concern the tions have been altered by changes in climatic pat­ distribution of woodlands prior to European settle­ terns and human use and, often, abuse. Management ment and changes since the introduction of livestock of these lands since European settlement has varied and fire control. This relates to whether tree densi­ from light exploitation and benign neglect, to attempts ties have been increasing or whether trees are invad­ to remove the trees in favor of forage for livestock, and ing grasslands and, to a lesser extent, drier ponde­ then to a realization that these lands contain useful re­ rosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Plan for the Recovery of Desert Bighorn Sheep in New Mexico 2003-2013
    PLAN FOR THE RECOVERY OF DESERT BIGHORN SHEEP IN NEW MEXICO 2003-2013 New Mexico Department of Game and Fish August 2003 Executive Summary Desert bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis mexicana) were once prolific in New Mexico, occupying most arid mountain ranges in the southern part of the state. Over-hunting, and disease transmission from livestock are 2 primary reasons for the dramatic decline in bighorn sheep numbers throughout the west during the early 1900s. In 1980, desert bighorn were placed on New Mexico’s endangered species list. From 1992-2003, approximately 25% of bighorn were radiocollared to learn causes of mortality driving this species towards extinction. Approximately 85% of all known-cause non-hunter killed radiocollared individuals have been killed by mountain lions. Despite the lack of a native ungulate prey base in desert bighorn range, mountain lion populations remain high, leading to the hypothesis that mountain lions are subsidized predators feeding on exotic ungulates, including cattle. Lack of fine fuels from cattle grazing have resulted in a lack of fire on the landscape. This has lead to increased woody vegetation which inhibits bighorn’s ability to detect and escape from predators. Bighorn numbers in spring 2003 in New Mexico totaled 213 in the wild, and 91 at the Red Rock captive breeding facility. This is in spite of releasing 266 bighorn from Red Rock and 30 bighorn from Arizona between 1979 and 2002. Several existing herds of desert bighorn likely need an augmentation to prevent them from going extinct. The presence of domestic sheep and Barbary sheep, which pose risks to bighorn from fatal disease transmission and aggression, respectively, preclude reintroduction onto many unoccupied mountain ranges.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Long Walk National Historic Trail Feasibility Study / Environmental Impact Statement Arizona • New Mexico
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Draft Long Walk National Historic Trail Feasibility Study / Environmental Impact Statement Arizona • New Mexico DRAFT LONG WALK NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Thanks to the New Mexico Humanities Council and the Western National Parks and Monuments Association for their important contributions to this study. DRAFT LONG WALK NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Apache, Coconino, Navajo Counties, Arizona; Bernalillo, Cibola, De Baca, Guadalupe, Lincoln, McKinley, Mora, Otero, Santa Fe, Sandoval, Torrance, Valencia Counties, New Mexico The purpose of this study is to evaluate the suitability and feasibility of designating the routes known as the “Long Walk” of the Mescalero Apache and the Navajo people (1862-1868) as a national historic trail under the study provisions of the National Trails System Act (Public Law 90-543). This study provides necessary information for evaluating the national significance of the Long Walk, which refers to the U.S. Army’s removal of the Mescalero Apache and Navajo people from their homelands to the Bosque Redondo Reservation in eastern New Mexico, and for potential designation of a national historic trail. Detailed administrative recommendations would be developed through the subsequent preparation of a comprehensive management plan if a national historic trail is designated. The three criteria for national historic trails, as defined in the National Trails System Act, have been applied and have been met for the proposed Long Walk National Historic Trail. The trail routes possess a high degree of integrity and significant potential for historical interest based on historic interpretation and appreciation.
    [Show full text]