Astronomical Coordinates, Distances and Magnitudes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Astronomical Coordinates, Distances and Magnitudes Volume 1 INTRODUCTION TO ASTRONOMY Astronomical Coordinates, Distances and Magnitudes Author: Prof. Ana Inés Gómez de Castro Universidad Complutense de Madrid Astronomy Workshop i INTRODUCTION TO ASTRONOMY Astronomy Workshop © Ana Inés Gómez de Castro Facultad de Ciencias Matemáticas Universidad Complutense de Madrid email: [email protected] Table o f Contents CHAPTER 1 Reference Systems (RSs) 1 Classification of Astronomic RSs 3 Fundamental planes 3 Alt-Azimutal System 5 Absolute Equatorial System 6 Hour Equatorial System 7 Ecliptic System 7 Summary 8 CHAPTER 2 Distances and Magnitudes 9 Units of Distance 9 Astronomic Magnitudes 10 Absolute Magnitudes 13 Summary 14 CHAPTER 3 Radiation Pressure 15 Definition 15 Spacial Missions 15 Summary 17 APPENDIX 1 Table of Exoplanets 18 Chapter 1 Reference Systems Cartesian and Spherical Polar Systems of Reference n order to locate the position of a point or to determine distances between points, it is necessary to define a Reference System (RS). Maps are the most I common examples. The two-dimensional Cartesian RS is the first defined in Spanish Schools. Two perpendicular axes, XY, and a unit of length are defined. The coordinates of any point are obtained by projecting the position of the point on the axes. The 2D Cartesian System is the easiest to introduce and can be naturally extended into 3D with axes XYZ. The .P(x,y) definition of coordinates through normal y projections is easy: besides, each of the coordinates gives information about the distance to the corresponding axis. For this reason, this reference system is not suitable for defining the location of objects without knowing their distance to the centre of the RS; this is the case of most of x the astronomical sources. Polar Reference Systems (RSs) are the most natural systems to define the position of a point located at an unknown distance. These are natural systems used since childhood to point towards something; the easiest version is to use the ground as a reference plane and mark the location of an object by its “elevation” above that plane and the angle between the line-of-sight to the object and some fiducial direction as, for instance, the corner of the room or the tower of the church. The abstraction of this natural SR is named the Spherical Polar System. The position of a point is given by three coordinates: two angles (φ,θ) and a distance (r) as shown in the figure. The geographical (geographical latitude and longitude) and the astronomical RSs are Spherical Polar systems. The differences between the various astronomical RSs are marked by the spatial orientation of the reference plane (or the direction perpendicular to it also as polar axis in the astronomical context) and the orientation of the fiducial direction in the reference plane. 1 Normal to the reference plane XY z .. P(x,y,z) P(r,θ,φ) y x Fiducial Direction The relationship between the Cartesian and the Spherical Polar coordinates is derived from the figure: x = r sinφ cosθ y = r sinφ sinθ z = r cosφ Once the spherical polar coordinates of two points are known P(r1, θ1, φ1) y Q(r2, θ2, φ2) the distance between them can be calculated by: – Transforming Spherical to Cartesian coordinates and using the expression : 2 2 2 d(,)()()() P Q= x2 − x 1 + y2 − y 1 + z2 − z 1 2 – Using the cosine formula of plane trigonometry and applying it to the triangle OPQ 1 P r1 d(P,Q) φ1 χ Q φ2 r2 O θ2 θ1 The main astronomical RSs are classified by: – the fundamental plane in: alt-azimutals, equatorials, ecliptics... – the location of the centre in: topocentrics, geocentrics, heliocentrics, baricentrics... Fundamental Planes Fundamental planes are defined as follows: Celestial Horizon: plane perpendicular to direction of the Earth gravity field2 at the location of the observer. Celestial Equator:: plane perpendicular to the axis of rotation of the Earth. Ecliptic: plane which contains the orbit of the Earth around the Sun.. The Celestial Horizon depends on the location of the observer on the Earth’s surface, and roughly coincides with the plane tangent to the figure of the Earth3 at the 1 Note that application of this formula requires the angle between r1 and r2 to be calculated,, χ, this can be shown to be, cos χ = cosφ1 cosφ2 + sinφ1 sinφ2 cos(θ 2 −θ1 ) , from spherical trigonometry. 2 This direction is often marked with a plumb and it is also known as the plumb line or the astronomical vertical. 3 The figure of the Earth is close to an ellipsoid of revolution. 3 observer location. The four cardinal points (North-South-East-West) are defined by the projection on the Horizon of the local “parallel” and “meridian” as shown in the figure: Rotation Axis of the Earth N Zenith E W Celestial Equator Centre of the Earth Celestial S Horizon Sky Observer (from a land point surface Zenith S E W N All RSs using the celestial horizon or the zenith to define either the reference plane or the fiducial direction on that plane, are tight to the surface of the Earth, and thus, rotate with it. The apparent motion of the Sun during the day and the stars during the night (east to west) just indicates that we, as observers of the sky, are bound to the surface of a rotating body: the Earth. The “true” motions of the stars are not appreciable at first sight. Thus, it is necessary to define a non-rotating SR to assign coordinates to the astronomical bodies that can be used for their identification. A new reference plane is introduced for this purpose: the ecliptic plane. The intersection between the ecliptic and the celestial 4 equator defines a straight line which is used as a fiducial direction in the non-rotating SRs. This straight line is named the nodal line and points in two well known directions in space: the Aries (γ) and Libra (Ω)4 constellations, marking the equinoxes. Ω Su Nodal line Ecliptic γ Celestial Equator Earth Alt-Azimutal Reference System The XY plane is the celestial horizon at the observer location and the polar axis (axis Z) points to the zenith. On the XY plane, the fiducial direction points to the south and the angles are measured from south to west. The alt-azimutal coordinates are two angles: Azimut (A) and Height (h). The relation between Cartesian and the alt-azimutal coordinates is: 4 In reality, neither the equator nor the ecliptic are fixed. The axis of rotation of the Earth changes direction in space due to the internal structure of the Earth and the gravitational interaction with the Sun, the Moon and other bodies in the Solar system. The orbit of the Earth is also slightly variable because of the action of other bodies in the Solar system. This problem is solved by determining the date or epoch to which the ecliptic and the equator used correspond. 5 Zénith r x = r cos h cosA y = r cos h sinA z = r sin h North h Sou A West (Absolute) Equatorial Reference System The plane XY is the celestial equator (the plane parallel to the equator of the Earth passing through the observer location), and the polar axis (axis Z) points to the North celestial Pole. The fiducial direction in the XY plane is marked by γ and angles are measured in the sense of Earth rotation (towards the East). The absolute equatorial astronomic coordinates are: Right Ascension(α) and Declination(δ). The relationship between the Cartesian coordinates and the equatorial coordinates is: North Pole r x = r cosδ cosα y = r cosδ sinα z = r sinδ δ α γ The Absolute Equatorial system is used, by default, to search and identify the astronomical sources. For instance, all exoplanetary systems in Appendix 1 are identified by one pair (α, δ) and one epoch5, which fixes the orientation of the equinox. These coordinates are used in the application “The smart space traveller” to represent the location of the known planetary systems. 5 The epoch is defined by its Julian date. Standard epochs were 1950.0 and 2000.0; the decimals indicate the fraction of the year passed since the beginning of the years of reference 1950 or 2000.. 6 Notice that the alt-azimutal system is the simplest for an observer situated on Earth (that is, in rotation) while the (absolute) equatorial system is the most suitable to render the coordinates of the astronomical sources; and an additional system is defined in between the two6 that has a fundamental plane, the celestial equator but uses as fiducial direction the “projection of the south” as marked in the figure and, henceforth, it is tight to the Earth rotation.. The angles are measured from the X axis X, in a counter Earth rotation direction (i.e., following the apparent movement of the stars from east to west). The (“hour”) equatorial astronomic coordinates of a star in this system are: Hour Angle (H) and Declination(δ). The relationship between the Cartesian coordinates and the (“hour”) Equatorial coordinates is: North Pole r x = r cosδ cos H y = r cosδ sin H z = r sinδ δ West H Ecliptic System of Reference Plane XY coincides with the ecliptic: the plane containing the orbit of the Earth around the Sun. The polar axis (axis Z) points to the north pole of the ecliptic. On this plane XY, the angles are measured from a point γ toward the East (in the direction of the Earth rotation and orbital motion). The ecliptic astronomical coordinates are given by two angles: Ecliptic Longitude (λ) and Ecliptic Latitude.
Recommended publications
  • INFORMATION CIRCULAR No. 185 (FEBRUARY 2015)
    INTERNATIONAL ASTRONOMICAL UNION COMMISSION 26 (DOUBLE STARS) INFORMATION CIRCULAR No. 185 (FEBRUARY 2015) NEW ORBITS ADS Name P T e Ω(2000) 2015 Author(s) α2000δ n a i ! Last ob. 2016 32 STF 3056 AB 545y 2142.0 0.670 136◦4 141◦9 000709 ZIRM 00047+3416 0◦6606 000623 99◦4 119◦6 2009.8 141.9 0.708 147 BU 255 245. 2067.2 0.960 166.1 66.3 0.445 ZIRM 00118+2825 1.4694 0.661 116.0 265.4 2008.8 65.9 0.442 285 AC 1 525. 1820.1 0.600 107.5 288.7 1.839 ZIRM 00209+3259 0.6857 1.234 84.0 26.8 2012.1 288.8 1.841 363 A 431 AB 53.56 2003.58 0.644 25.5 329.5 0.172 SCARDIA 00271-0753 6.7214 0.364 109.0 293.0 2013.573 321.9 0.168 et al. (*) 1081 STF 113 A-BC 650. 1686.0 0.640 87.2 20.4 1.637 ZIRM 01198-0031 0.5538 1.324 43.5 106.7 2013.9 20.6 1.638 - MCA 7 3.800 2010.280 0.017 145.0 47.8 0.030 DOCOBO 02366+1227 94.737 0.077 112.7 3.7 2010.718 322.9 0.078 et al. (**) - FIN 333 83.73 1998.06 0.423 34.1 34.1 0.462 DOCOBO 02434-6643 4.300 0.509 90.0 269.2 2013.737 34.1 0.457 et al. (**) 2524 A 2909 11.345 2013.744 0.507 16.2 23.1 0.129 DOCOBO 03244-1539 31.732 0.172 71.3 283.0 2013.737 3 38.4 0.125 et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Planetas Extrasolares
    Local Extrasolar Planets Universidad Andres Bello ESO Vitacura 4 June 2015 Foto: Dante Joyce Minniti Pullen The big picture 1. Increase human resources and networks for national Astronomy 2. Develop new areas of research and do quality science 3. Promote science in Chile Universidad Andres Bello ESO Vitacura 4 June 2015 Dante Minniti The Pioneers Wolfgang Gieren Maria Teresa Ruiz Grzegorz Pietrzynski Dante Minniti School on Extrasolar Planets and Brown Dwarfs Santiago, 2003 Invited Lecturers: Michel Mayor, Scott Tremaine, Gill Knapp, France Allard Universidad Andres Bello ESO Vitacura 4 June 2015 Dante Minniti It is all about time... Telescope time is the most precious... Universidad Andres Bello ESO Vitacura 4 June 2015 Dante Minniti The Pioneers Wolfgang Gieren Maria Teresa Ruiz Grzegorz Pietrzynski Dante Minniti The first exoplanet for us: M. Konacki, G. Torres, D. D. Sasselov, G. Pietrzynski, A. Udalski, S. Jha, M. T. Ruiz, W. Gieren, & D. Minniti, “A Transiting Extrasolar Giant Planet Around the Star OGLE-TR-113'', 2004, ApJ, 609, L37” Universidad Andres Bello ESO Vitacura 4 June 2015 Dante Minniti The Pioneers Paul Butler Debra Fischer Dante Minniti The First Planets from the N2K Consortium Fischer et al., ``A Hot Saturn Planet Orbiting HD 88133, from the N2K Consortium", 2005, The Astrophysical Journal, 620, 481 Sato, et al., ``The N2K Consortium. II. A Transiting Hot Saturn around HD 149026 with a Large Dense Core", 2005, The Astrophysical Journal, 633, 465 Universidad Andres Bello ESO Vitacura 4 June 2015 Dante Minniti The Pioneers
    [Show full text]
  • Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants As Tracers of Planet Formation
    Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants as Tracers of Planet Formation Thesis by Marta Levesque Bryan In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Pasadena, California 2018 Defended May 1, 2018 ii © 2018 Marta Levesque Bryan ORCID: [0000-0002-6076-5967] All rights reserved iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to thank Heather Knutson, who I had the great privilege of working with as my thesis advisor. Her encouragement, guidance, and perspective helped me navigate many a challenging problem, and my conversations with her were a consistent source of positivity and learning throughout my time at Caltech. I leave graduate school a better scientist and person for having her as a role model. Heather fostered a wonderfully positive and supportive environment for her students, giving us the space to explore and grow - I could not have asked for a better advisor or research experience. I would also like to thank Konstantin Batygin for enthusiastic and illuminating discussions that always left me more excited to explore the result at hand. Thank you as well to Dimitri Mawet for providing both expertise and contagious optimism for some of my latest direct imaging endeavors. Thank you to the rest of my thesis committee, namely Geoff Blake, Evan Kirby, and Chuck Steidel for their support, helpful conversations, and insightful questions. I am grateful to have had the opportunity to collaborate with Brendan Bowler. His talk at Caltech my second year of graduate school introduced me to an unexpected population of massive wide-separation planetary-mass companions, and lead to a long-running collaboration from which several of my thesis projects were born.
    [Show full text]
  • Where Are the Distant Worlds? Star Maps
    W here Are the Distant Worlds? Star Maps Abo ut the Activity Whe re are the distant worlds in the night sky? Use a star map to find constellations and to identify stars with extrasolar planets. (Northern Hemisphere only, naked eye) Topics Covered • How to find Constellations • Where we have found planets around other stars Participants Adults, teens, families with children 8 years and up If a school/youth group, 10 years and older 1 to 4 participants per map Materials Needed Location and Timing • Current month's Star Map for the Use this activity at a star party on a public (included) dark, clear night. Timing depends only • At least one set Planetary on how long you want to observe. Postcards with Key (included) • A small (red) flashlight • (Optional) Print list of Visible Stars with Planets (included) Included in This Packet Page Detailed Activity Description 2 Helpful Hints 4 Background Information 5 Planetary Postcards 7 Key Planetary Postcards 9 Star Maps 20 Visible Stars With Planets 33 © 2008 Astronomical Society of the Pacific www.astrosociety.org Copies for educational purposes are permitted. Additional astronomy activities can be found here: http://nightsky.jpl.nasa.gov Detailed Activity Description Leader’s Role Participants’ Roles (Anticipated) Introduction: To Ask: Who has heard that scientists have found planets around stars other than our own Sun? How many of these stars might you think have been found? Anyone ever see a star that has planets around it? (our own Sun, some may know of other stars) We can’t see the planets around other stars, but we can see the star.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolved Astrometric Binary Stars Brian D. Mason
    Resolved Astrometric Binary Stars Brian D. Mason 9/12/2012 U.S. Naval Observatory 1 Background Astrometric contributions of Friedrich Bessel (1784-1846) •Parallax of 61 Cygni (1838) U.S. Naval Observatory Background Astrometric contributions of Friedrich Bessel (1784-1846) •Parallax of 61 Cygni (1838) •Non-linear proper motion of Sirius and Procyon (1844) Image: http://vega.lpl.arizona.edu/sirius/A5.html U.S. Naval Observatory Background Astrometric contributions of Friedrich Bessel (1784-1846) •Parallax of 61 Cygni (1838) •Non-linear proper motion of Sirius and Procyon (1844) Due to stellar types (main- sequence and white dwarf) motion affect significant, but Image: http://vega.lpl.arizona.edu/sirius/A5.html companion hard to detect. • Sirius B first resolved in 1862 by Alvan Graham Clark (right) testing 18.5 ” Clark refractor. U.S. Naval Observatory Background Astrometric contributions of Friedrich Bessel (1784-1846) •Parallax of 61 Cygni (1838) •Non-linear proper motion of Sirius and Procyon (1844) Due to stellar types (main- sequence and white dwarf) motion affect significant, but companion hard to detect. • Sirius B first resolved in 1862 by Alvan Graham Clark (right) testing 18.5 ” Clark refractor. • Procyon B first resolved in 1896 by John Martin Schaeberle with Lick 36 ” Clark refractor. U.S. Naval Observatory CurrentCurrent Orbit: Orbit: Procyon Sirius AB AB • Broken line is line of nodes. • Green plus signs and asterisks: micrometry. • Pink asterisks: photography • Blue circles: HST/WFPC2 • Scales on axis are in arcseconds. • Direction of orbital motion at lower right. • Sirius Period = 50.090y. • Procyon Period = 40.82y. U.S. Naval Observatory Orbits • The 6 th Catalog of Orbits of Visual Binary Stars has 2298 orbits of 2187 systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunting Down Stars with Unusual Infrared Properties Using Supervised Machine Learning
    . Magnificent beasts of the Milky Way: Hunting down stars with unusual infrared properties using supervised machine learning Julia Ahlvind1 Supervisor: Erik Zackrisson1 Subject reader: Eric Stempels1 Examiner: Andreas Korn1 Degree project E in Physics { Astronomy, 30 ECTS 1Department of Physics and Astronomy { Uppsala University June 22, 2021 Contents 1 Background 2 1.1 Introduction................................................2 2 Theory: Machine Learning 2 2.1 Supervised machine learning.......................................3 2.2 Classification...............................................3 2.3 Various models..............................................3 2.3.1 k-nearest neighbour (kNN)...................................3 2.3.2 Decision tree...........................................4 2.3.3 Support Vector Machine (SVM)................................4 2.3.4 Discriminant analysis......................................5 2.3.5 Ensemble.............................................6 2.4 Hyperparameter tuning.........................................6 2.5 Evaluation.................................................6 2.5.1 Confusion matrix.........................................6 2.5.2 Precision and classification accuracy..............................7 3 Theory: Astronomy 7 3.1 Dyson spheres...............................................8 3.2 Dust-enshrouded stars..........................................8 3.3 Gray Dust.................................................9 3.4 M-dwarf.................................................. 10 3.5 post-AGB
    [Show full text]
  • Maio - 2017 Francisco Jânio Cavalcante
    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO NORTE CENTRO DE CIÊNCIAS EXATAS E DA TERRA DEPARTAMENTO DE FÍSICA TEÓRICA E EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM FÍSICA EVOLUÇÃO DO ÍNDICE DE FREIO MAGNÉTICO PARA ESTRELAS DO TIPO SOLAR FRANCISCO JÂNIO CAVALCANTE NATAL (RN) MAIO - 2017 FRANCISCO JÂNIO CAVALCANTE EVOLUÇÃO DO ÍNDICE DE FREIO MAGNÉTICO PARA ESTRELAS DO TIPO SOLAR Tese de Doutorado apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Física do Departamento de Física Teórica e Experimental da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte como requisito parcial para a obtenção do grau de Doutor em Física. Orientador: Dr. Daniel Brito de Freitas NATAL (RN) MAIO - 2017 UFRN / Biblioteca Central Zila Mamede Catalogação da Publicação na Fonte Cavalcante, Francisco Jânio. Evolução do índice de freio magnético para estrelas do tipo solar / Francisco Jânio Cavalcante. - 2017. 166 f. : il. Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Centro de Ciências Exatas e da Terra, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Física. Natal, RN, 2017. Orientador: Prof. Dr. Daniel Brito de Freitas. 1. Rotação estelar - Tese. 2. Freio magnético - Tese. 3. Distribuição e estatística - Tese. I. Freitas, Daniel Brito de. II. Título. RN/UF/BCZM CDU 524.3 Para Pessoas Especiais: A minha avó, minha mãe e minha namorada Ester Saraiva da Silva (in memorian) Cleta Carneiro Cavalcante Simone Santos Martins Agradecimentos Agradeço ao bom e generoso Deus, quem me deu muitas coisas no decorrer da minha vida. Deu-me compreensão e amparo nos momento de aflição e tristeza, saúde para continuar nesta caminhada. Ofereceu-me sua luz no momento em que a escuridão sufocava meu espírito.
    [Show full text]
  • 100 Closest Stars Designation R.A
    100 closest stars Designation R.A. Dec. Mag. Common Name 1 Gliese+Jahreis 551 14h30m –62°40’ 11.09 Proxima Centauri Gliese+Jahreis 559 14h40m –60°50’ 0.01, 1.34 Alpha Centauri A,B 2 Gliese+Jahreis 699 17h58m 4°42’ 9.53 Barnard’s Star 3 Gliese+Jahreis 406 10h56m 7°01’ 13.44 Wolf 359 4 Gliese+Jahreis 411 11h03m 35°58’ 7.47 Lalande 21185 5 Gliese+Jahreis 244 6h45m –16°49’ -1.43, 8.44 Sirius A,B 6 Gliese+Jahreis 65 1h39m –17°57’ 12.54, 12.99 BL Ceti, UV Ceti 7 Gliese+Jahreis 729 18h50m –23°50’ 10.43 Ross 154 8 Gliese+Jahreis 905 23h45m 44°11’ 12.29 Ross 248 9 Gliese+Jahreis 144 3h33m –9°28’ 3.73 Epsilon Eridani 10 Gliese+Jahreis 887 23h06m –35°51’ 7.34 Lacaille 9352 11 Gliese+Jahreis 447 11h48m 0°48’ 11.13 Ross 128 12 Gliese+Jahreis 866 22h39m –15°18’ 13.33, 13.27, 14.03 EZ Aquarii A,B,C 13 Gliese+Jahreis 280 7h39m 5°14’ 10.7 Procyon A,B 14 Gliese+Jahreis 820 21h07m 38°45’ 5.21, 6.03 61 Cygni A,B 15 Gliese+Jahreis 725 18h43m 59°38’ 8.90, 9.69 16 Gliese+Jahreis 15 0h18m 44°01’ 8.08, 11.06 GX Andromedae, GQ Andromedae 17 Gliese+Jahreis 845 22h03m –56°47’ 4.69 Epsilon Indi A,B,C 18 Gliese+Jahreis 1111 8h30m 26°47’ 14.78 DX Cancri 19 Gliese+Jahreis 71 1h44m –15°56’ 3.49 Tau Ceti 20 Gliese+Jahreis 1061 3h36m –44°31’ 13.09 21 Gliese+Jahreis 54.1 1h13m –17°00’ 12.02 YZ Ceti 22 Gliese+Jahreis 273 7h27m 5°14’ 9.86 Luyten’s Star 23 SO 0253+1652 2h53m 16°53’ 15.14 24 SCR 1845-6357 18h45m –63°58’ 17.40J 25 Gliese+Jahreis 191 5h12m –45°01’ 8.84 Kapteyn’s Star 26 Gliese+Jahreis 825 21h17m –38°52’ 6.67 AX Microscopii 27 Gliese+Jahreis 860 22h28m 57°42’ 9.79,
    [Show full text]
  • Stability of Planets in Binary Star Systems
    StabilityStability ofof PlanetsPlanets inin BinaryBinary StarStar SystemsSystems Ákos Bazsó in collaboration with: E. Pilat-Lohinger, D. Bancelin, B. Funk ADG Group Outline Exoplanets in multiple star systems Secular perturbation theory Application: tight binary systems Summary + Outlook About NFN sub-project SP8 “Binary Star Systems and Habitability” Stand-alone project “Exoplanets: Architecture, Evolution and Habitability” Basic dynamical types S-type motion (“satellite”) around one star P-type motion (“planetary”) around both stars Image: R. Schwarz Exoplanets in multiple star systems Observations: (Schwarz 2014, Binary Catalogue) ● 55 binary star systems with 81 planets ● 43 S-type + 12 P-type systems ● 10 multiple star systems with 10 planets Example: γ Cep (Hatzes et al. 2003) ● RV measurements since 1981 ● Indication for a “planet” (Campbell et al. 1988) ● Binary period ~57 yrs, planet period ~2.5 yrs Multiplicity of stars ~45% of solar like stars (F6 – K3) with d < 25 pc in multiple star systems (Raghavan et al. 2010) Known exoplanet host stars: single double triple+ source 77% 20% 3% Raghavan et al. (2006) 83% 15% 2% Mugrauer & Neuhäuser (2009) 88% 10% 2% Roell et al. (2012) Exoplanet catalogues The Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia http://exoplanet.eu Exoplanet Orbit Database http://exoplanets.org Open Exoplanet Catalogue http://www.openexoplanetcatalogue.com The Planetary Habitability Laboratory http://phl.upr.edu/home NASA Exoplanet Archive http://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu Binary Catalogue of Exoplanets http://www.univie.ac.at/adg/schwarz/multiple.html Habitable Zone Gallery http://www.hzgallery.org Binary Catalogue Binary Catalogue of Exoplanets http://www.univie.ac.at/adg/schwarz/multiple.html Dynamical stability Stability limit for S-type planets Rabl & Dvorak (1988), Holman & Wiegert (1999), Pilat-Lohinger & Dvorak (2002) Parameters (a , e , μ) bin bin Outer limit at roughly max.
    [Show full text]
  • Naming the Extrasolar Planets
    Naming the extrasolar planets W. Lyra Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K¨onigstuhl 17, 69177, Heidelberg, Germany [email protected] Abstract and OGLE-TR-182 b, which does not help educators convey the message that these planets are quite similar to Jupiter. Extrasolar planets are not named and are referred to only In stark contrast, the sentence“planet Apollo is a gas giant by their assigned scientific designation. The reason given like Jupiter” is heavily - yet invisibly - coated with Coper- by the IAU to not name the planets is that it is consid- nicanism. ered impractical as planets are expected to be common. I One reason given by the IAU for not considering naming advance some reasons as to why this logic is flawed, and sug- the extrasolar planets is that it is a task deemed impractical. gest names for the 403 extrasolar planet candidates known One source is quoted as having said “if planets are found to as of Oct 2009. The names follow a scheme of association occur very frequently in the Universe, a system of individual with the constellation that the host star pertains to, and names for planets might well rapidly be found equally im- therefore are mostly drawn from Roman-Greek mythology. practicable as it is for stars, as planet discoveries progress.” Other mythologies may also be used given that a suitable 1. This leads to a second argument. It is indeed impractical association is established. to name all stars. But some stars are named nonetheless. In fact, all other classes of astronomical bodies are named.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2005
    Max Planck Institute t für Astron itu o st m n ie -I k H c e n id la e l P b - e x r a g M M g for Astronomy a r x e b P l la e n id The Max Planck Society c e k H In y s m titu no Heidelberg-Königstuhl te for Astro The Max Planck Society for the Promotion of Sciences was founded in 1948. It operates at present 88 Institutes and other facilities dedicated to basic and applied research. With an annual budget of around 1.4 billion € in the year 2005, the Max Planck Society has about 12 400 employees, of which 4300 are scientists. In addition, annually about 11000 junior and visiting scientists are working at the Institutes of the Max Planck Society. The goal of the Max Planck Society is to promote centers of excellence at the fore- front of the international scientific research. To this end, the Institutes of the Society are equipped with adequate tools and put into the hands of outstanding scientists, who Annual Report have a high degree of autonomy in their scientific work. 2005 Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften e.V. 2005 Public Relations Office Hofgartenstr. 8 80539 München Tel.: 089/2108-1275 or -1277 Annual Report Fax: 089/2108-1207 Internet: www.mpg.de Max Planck Institute for Astronomie K 4242 K 4243 Dossenheim B 3 D o s s E 35 e n h e N i eckar A5 m e r L a n d L 531 s t r M a a ß nn e he im B e e r r S t tr a a - K 9700 ß B e e n z - S t r a ß e Ziegelhausen Wieblingen Handschuhsheim K 9702 St eu b A656 e n s t B 37 r a E 35 ß e B e In de A5 r r N l kar ec i c M Ne k K 9702 n e a Ruprecht-Karls- ß lierb rh
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2105.11583V2 [Astro-Ph.EP] 2 Jul 2021 Keck-HIRES, APF-Levy, and Lick-Hamilton Spectrographs
    Draft version July 6, 2021 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX63 The California Legacy Survey I. A Catalog of 178 Planets from Precision Radial Velocity Monitoring of 719 Nearby Stars over Three Decades Lee J. Rosenthal,1 Benjamin J. Fulton,1, 2 Lea A. Hirsch,3 Howard T. Isaacson,4 Andrew W. Howard,1 Cayla M. Dedrick,5, 6 Ilya A. Sherstyuk,1 Sarah C. Blunt,1, 7 Erik A. Petigura,8 Heather A. Knutson,9 Aida Behmard,9, 7 Ashley Chontos,10, 7 Justin R. Crepp,11 Ian J. M. Crossfield,12 Paul A. Dalba,13, 14 Debra A. Fischer,15 Gregory W. Henry,16 Stephen R. Kane,13 Molly Kosiarek,17, 7 Geoffrey W. Marcy,1, 7 Ryan A. Rubenzahl,1, 7 Lauren M. Weiss,10 and Jason T. Wright18, 19, 20 1Cahill Center for Astronomy & Astrophysics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 2IPAC-NASA Exoplanet Science Institute, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 3Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA 4Department of Astronomy, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 5Cahill Center for Astronomy & Astrophysics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 6Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, The Pennsylvania State University, 525 Davey Lab, University Park, PA 16802, USA 7NSF Graduate Research Fellow 8Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA 9Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 10Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawai`i,
    [Show full text]