DOCSLIB.ORG

PROJECTIONS Proceedings of the 26Th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA 2021)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PROJECTIONS Proceedings of the 26Th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA 2021) PROJECTIONS Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA 2021) Volume 1 Edited by Anastasia Globa University of Sydney Jeroen van Ameijde The Chinese University of Hong Kong Adam Fingrut The Chinese University of Hong Kong Nayeon Kim Yonsei University Sky Lo Tian Tian Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen) Projections 26th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA 2021) 29 March – 1 April 2021 School of Architecture The Chinese University of Hong Kong ©2021 All rights reserved and published by The Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA), Hong Kong ISBN: 978-988-78917-5-8 Printed in Hong Kong v Foreword The annual CAADRIA (Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia) conference provides an international community of researchers and practitioners with a venue to exchange, to discuss and to publish their latest ideas and accomplishments. The proceedings have two volumes containing the research papers that were accepted for presentation at the Projections – 26th In- ternational CAADRIA Conference, hosted and organised by the Faculty of Archi- tecture at Chinese University of Hong Kong. The papers are also available online at the open access cumulative database CumInCAD {http://papers.cumin- cad.org}. The proceedings are the outcome of an extensive collaborative effort of a team of volunteers and CAADRIA’s international Academic Review Commit- tee. Within the context of continued challenges and restrictions imposed by the ongoing world-wide pandemic, our CAADRIA community have shown its resil- ience and strength. Initial calls for papers in July 2020 resulted in a round number of 400 abstract submissions. These abstracts were assessed by the Paper Selection Committee and were a subject to a double-blind peer review performed by a team of 151 international reviewers. 250 papers were invited to proceed to the next stage - the full-length paper submission. Those manuscripts went through another series of double-blind reviews, with two-to-four for each paper. As a result, 152 submissions were accepted and 149 of these were ultimately published in the CAADRIA 2021 proceedings. We congratulate the authors for their accomplish- ment. Next to the authors, the reviewers, who volunteered their valuable time and effort, deserve our sincere thanks and acknowledgements. We thank the Organis- ing Team at The Chinese University of Hong Kong for hosting the 26th Interna- tional CAADRIA Conference online. We extend our special thanks to the ProceeDings team, and in particular Ga- briel Wurzer, for his support with customizing the submission and review system to the needs of CAADRIA from the full-paper submission to the production stage. On the following pages, we acknowledge and thank those who contributed to the production of this volume. In closing, we sincerely thank the CAADRIA commu- nity for offering us the honour to serve as members of the paper selection com- mittee for Projections, the 26th International CAADRIA Conference 2021. Anastasia Globa University of Sydney (Chair) Jeroen van Ameijde The Chinese University of Hong Kong Adam Fingrut The Chinese University of Hong Kong Nayeon Kim Yonsei University Sky Lo Tian Tian Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen) vi CAADRIA 2021 Theme: ‘Projections’ In a time of unprecedented global challenges, the need for researchers and de- signers to reflect on our changing society has rarely been more obvious. As the pandemic highlights the precariousness of our fragile climate, limited resources and unequitable urban areas, there is a new mandate for research and innovation, searching for new technology-enabled processes that positively impact our pro- fession, communities, and planet. The advancement and adoption of new technologies in all aspects of our soci- ety have started to profoundly change the nature of architectural design and ma- terialisation processes, bridging between the digital and the physical worlds. Fluid communication allows for unprecedented new levels of complexity, control and feedback between design and the built environment. Large quantities of infor- mation allow us to forecast how architectural and urban structures perform over time, against a detailed understanding of their contexts. ‘Projections’ focuses on the implementation of our work, asking us to reflect upon the different ways innovation will impact the future of our industry. We will invite conversations and debate around the status of computational research and design, reflecting on recent challenges and opportunities, and how these translate into futures that are different from what was previously predicted. As we assess our projects within the context of our shared realities, we position our work as prototypes for alternative futures in our collective field. The 2021 annual conference for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Re- search in Asia (CAADRIA), will bring together academics, researchers and prac- titioners involved in innovating, disrupting or revolutionising processes for the conceptualisation, evaluation and materialisation of the built environment. By in- viting participants from universities and practices throughout Asia, we aim to cre- ate a platform for shared moments of inspiration, reflection, and projection. Conference Organisers & Hosts, Kristof Crolla The University of Hong Kong Adam Fingrut The Chinese University of Hong Kong Jeroen van Ameijde The Chinese University of Hong Kong {https://caadria2021.org} vii About CAADRIA The Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA) promotes teaching and research in CAAD in the larger Austral- Asian and Pacific region supported by a global membership. CAADRIA was founded in 1996 with the following objectives: ● To facilitate the dissemination of information about CAAD among Asian schools of architecture, planning, engineering, and building sciences. ● To encourage the exchange of staff, students, experience, courseware, and software among schools. ● To identify research and develop needs in CAAD education and to initiate collaboration to satisfy them. ● To promote research and teaching in CAAD that enhances creativity rather than production. CAADRIA organizes among others an annual conference, the first of which was held in 1996 in Hong Kong. Since then, 25 conferences have been held in Australia, China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, New Zealand, Sin- gapore, Taiwan, and Thailand. The annual CAADRIA conferences provide an opportunity to meet, to learn about the latest research, and to continue the dis- course in the field. The 26th conference, in 2021, is held at The Chinese University of Hong Kong. CAADRIA 2021 is held as a virtual conference for the second time in the history of the Association to bring together researchers, practitioners and schools of the pacific region even at a time of continued global Covid-19 related travel restrictions. CAADRIA is one of the four founding organizations of the International Jour- nal of Architectural Computing (IJAC), and typically co-edits one issue each year. IJAC is published by SAGE in both paper and electronic versions. Christiane M. Herr President, CAADRIA viii CAADRIA Officers President: Christiane M. Herr Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, China Secretary: Urvi Sheth CEPT University, India Treasurer: Hyoung-June Park University of Hawaii, USA Membership Officer: Immanuel Koh Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore Web Master: Kyung Hoon Hyun Hanyang University, Korea Administrative Officer: Marc Aurel Schnabel Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand CAADRIA 2021 Conference Committees Hosting Institution: The Chinese University of Hong Kong Organising Committee: Kristof Crolla The University of Hong Kong Conference Co-Chair Adam Fingrut The Chinese University of Hong Kong Conference Co-Chair Jeroen van Ameijde The Chinese University of Hong Kong Conference Co-Chair Donn Holohan The University of Hong Kong Workshop Coordinator Hoi Lam Melody The Chinese University of Hong Kong Tour Coordinator Garvin Goepel The Chinese University of Hong Kong Technical Coordinator Lidia Ratoi The University of Hong Kong Exhibition Coordinator ix Paper Selection Committee: Anastasia Globa University of Sydney Chair Jeroen van Ameijde The Chinese University of Hong Kong Adam Fingrut The Chinese University of Hong Kong Nayeon Kim Yonsei University Sky Lo Tian Tian Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen) Post Graduate Students Consortium: Dagmar Reinhardt Co-Chair Sky Lo Tian Tian Co-Chair Christiane M. Herr Sasada Prize Committee: Tom Kvan Chair Christiane M. Herr Atsuko Karga Young CAADRIA Award Committee: Sky Lo Tian Tian Chair Christiane M. Herr Rudi Stouffs Jeroen van Ameijde x International Review Committee Wael Abdelhameed Kristof Crolla Applied Science University The University of Hong Kong Henri Achten Tatjana Crossley Czech Technical University, Prague The Chinese University of Hong Ayşegül Akçay Kavakoğlu Kong Istanbul Technical University Weiwen Cui Mostafa Alani Tsinghua University Aliraqia University Pierre Cutellic Miktha Farid Alkadri ETH Zurich TU Delft Mohammad Reza Dastmalchi Jeroen van Ameijde University of Missouri The Chinese University of Hong Marie Davidova Kong Welsh School of Architecture Nan Bai Collaborative Collective TU Delft Aurélie de Boissieu Ardavan Bidgoli The University of Liège Carnegie Mellon University Danilo Di Mascio Luis Borunda
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fall/Winter 2014
    publications + distribution fall/winter 2014 FALL/WINTER 2014 Frontlist 3 New Publisher Backlist 58 Backlist 61 Index 127 Order & Trade Information 134 rampub.com Architecture Architecture FORENSIS The Architecture of Public Truth Forensis (Latin for “pertaining to the forum”) engages the testimony of material objects—such as bones, ruins, toxic substances—as a method of central importance in interpreting how subjects are policed and governed by their states. Developed through the Forensic Architecture Project by theorist Eyal Weizman at Goldsmiths College, University of London, Forensis seeks to expand the scope of contemporary forensics to include a broader historical, theoretical, political and aesthetic context. At the heart of the book is a methodological experiment in which participating architects, artists, filmmakers, lawyers, and theorists employed new technologies and spatial research methods to investigate contemporary issues such as border regimes, urban warfare, and climate change. Investigations were undertaken in Pakistan, Palestine, the Amazon basin, Guatemala, Chile, Bangladesh, Yemen, the United States and the former Yugoslavia among others places. Evidence of state or corporate violence was unearthed for use by prosecution teams, civil society organizations, activist networks, human rights groups, and the United Nations. Innovative investigations aimed at producing new kinds of evidence in this rich collection of essays and research reports suggest many new ways that international prosecutorial teams, political organizations,
    [Show full text]
  • Vision Und Konstruktion 9
    Elefantenhaus, Zoo Zürich U-Bahn-Viadukt, Symposium Berlin Tragwerksplanung Spannbetonfaltwerk- dach, Mülimatt Golfklub Yeogu, Südkorea Vision und Konstruktion 9. Oktober 2015 UdK Berlin EXPO Pavillon, Südkorea Mit freundlicher Unterstützung von: Titel: Coop Himmelblau, EZB-Bank Frankfurt, Copyright ISOCHROM Titel: Tragwerksplanung 2015 Tagesprogramm, 9. Oktober 2015 Anmeldung (Bitte bis zum 21.09.2015 per Post oder Fax unter 0351/795 74 97 19 bzw. unter www.bauakademie-sachsen.de) 9.00 - 9.15 Vision und Konstruktion Name, Vorname Vision und Konstruktion Volker Schmid, TU-Berlin, Christoph Gengnagel, UdK Berlin, Das Tragwerksplaner Symposium – Vision und Konstruktion themati ­­ Christian Müller, CMIB Berlin siert anhand herausragender nationaler und internationaler Beispie- Anschrift le die kreative Arbeit der Ingenieure, ihre Ideen bei der Trag werks- 9.15 - 10.00 entwicklung und der Konzeption von Gebäuden. Besonders interessiert leicht, lang, hoch – Bauten in und aus Berlin dabei der adäquate Umgang mit den unterschiedlichen verwendeten Boris Reyher, schlaich bergermann und partner, Berlin Telefon/Fax Materialien, ebenso wie die praktische Umsetzung des Tragwerkskon- zepts auf der Baustelle. Der subjektive Zugang der planenden Ingeni- 10.00 - 10.45 eure und ihre Ideen und Standpunkte werden von den international Europäische Zentralbank in Frankfurt E-Mail bekannten Vortragenden vorgestellt und laden zur Diskussion ein. Manfred Grohmann, Bollinger + Grohmann, Frankfurt a. M. Das Symposium wendet sich vor allem an Bauingenieure, konstruktiv
    [Show full text]
  • Applying Design Thinking to Glass Systems in the 18 Septemberplein Redevelopment
    Challenging Glass 7 Conference on Architectural and Structural Applications of Glass Belis, Bos & Louter (Eds.), Ghent University, September 2020. Copyright © with the authors. All rights reserved. ISBN 978-94-6366-296-3, https://doi.org/10.7480/cgc.7.4608 Beyond Materiality, Towards Craftsmanship: Applying Design Thinking to Glass Systems in the 18 Septemberplein Redevelopment Ben van Berkel a, Gerard Loozekoot a, Filippo Lodi a, Sitou Akolly a, Atira Ariffin a a UNStudio, The Netherlands, [email protected] This paper describes the design process UNStudio undertook in the redevelopment of the C&A Building on 18 Septemberplein in Eindhoven, the Netherlands. The design brief primarily called for the rebranding of the building while maintaining the building’s façade historic value and aesthetic. Secondarily, the design is meant to activate the urban context where the building is located without competing with the neighboring landmarks. UNStudio saw an opportunity to rethink the transparent layer – the glass window – of the building as a tool to enhance its identity minimizing the aesthetic impact on its historic facade. This case study outlines opportunities to innovate while designing with glass through two often polarized perspectives: contemporary architecture and historic preservation. Architects constantly negotiate the value of private versus public space, transparency versus opacity, and building energy performance in our built environment through the use of glass. Emerging integrated technologies such as LED, photovoltaic, lamination, and touch sensitive layer are enabling new ways of rethinking the roles and applications of glass: as an architectural element, an information layering surface, and an agent for light and transparency.
    [Show full text]
  • Archi DOCT the E-Journal For
    ISSN 2309-0103 1 www.enhsa.net/archidoct // Vol. 4 (1) / July 2016 The e-journal for the dissemination of doctoral archi DOCT research in architecture. Supported by the ENHSA Network | Fueled by the ENHSA Observatory July2016 TRANSFORMABLE www.enhsa.net/archidoct 7 ISSN 2309-0103 ARCHITECTURE europeaneuropean network network European Observatory enhsaenhsa of Doctoral Research of headsof ofheads schools of schools of architecture of architecture in Architecture ISSN 2309-0103 2 www.enhsa.net/archidoct // Vol. 4 (1) / July 2016 The e-journal for the dissemination of doctoral archi DOCT research in architecture. ISSN 2309-0103 3 www.enhsa.net/archidoct // Vol. 4 (1) / July 2016 3 Maria Voyatzaki // Editor-in-Chief Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Constantin Spiridonidis ENHSA Coordinator Editor-in-Chief Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Stefano Musso University of Genoa Marios Phocas University of Cyprus Ramon Sastre Universitat Politècnica Catalunya Juri Soolep Umea University Marianthi Liapi Editorial Board Technical University of Crete / Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Antonis Moras Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Theodora Vardouli Massachusetts Institute of Technology Barbara Elisabeth Ascher The Oslo School of Architecture and Design ISSN 2309-0103 4 www.enhsa.net/archidoct // Vol. 4 (1) / July 2016 4 Edith Ackermann // Media Lab // MIT & GSD // Harvard University Balázs Balogh Faculty of Architecture // Budapest University of Technology and Economics Henriette Bier Faculty of Architecture // TU Delft Michael Fedeski
    [Show full text]
  • Framework for an Architectural Knowledge Ecosystem Through the Distribution of Authorship
    FRAMEWORK FOR AN ARCHITECTURAL KNOWLEDGE ECOSYSTEM THROUGH THE DISTRIBUTION OF AUTHORSHIP A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY CANAN ALBAYRAK DE BRITO COLAÇO IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN ARCHITECTURE SEPTEMBER 2018 Approval of the thesis: FRAMEWORK FOR AN ARCHITECTURAL KNOWLEDGE ECOSYSTEM THROUGH THE DISTRIBUTION OF AUTHORSHIP submitted by CANAN ALBAYRAK DE BRITO COLAÇO in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Architecture Department, Middle East Technical University by, Prof. Dr. Halil Kalıpçılar Dean, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Prof. Dr. F. Cânâ Bilsel Head of Department, Architecture Prof. Dr. Zeynep Mennan Supervisor, Architecture., METU Examining Committee Members: Prof. Dr. C. Abdi Güzer Architecture Dept., METU Prof. Dr. Zeynep Mennan Architecture Dept., METU Prof. Dr. Şule Taşlı Pektaş Architecture Dept., Başkent University Assoc. Prof. Dr. Fehmi Doğan Architecture Dept., Izmir Institute of Technology Assist. Prof. Dr. Başak Uçar Architecture Dept., TED University Date: 04.09.2018 I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Signature : iv ABSTRACT FRAMEWORK FOR AN ARCHITECTURAL KNOWLEDGE ECOSYSTEM THROUGH THE DISTRIBUTION OF AUTHORSHIP Albayrak de Brito Colaço, Canan Ph.D., Department of Architecture Supervisor : Prof. Dr. Zeynep Mennan September 2018, 128 pages Shifts from centralized towards socially distributed knowledge production modes are having a great impact on many fields and reshaping the understanding of knowledge production.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gallery Club Architecture in Photography
    Architecture in The Photography Gallery Four generations of Dutch Club architectural photographers The Gallery Club presents Architecture in Photography Four Generations of Dutch Architectural Photographers This exhibition focuses on four generations of Dutch architectural photographers, starting with Jan Versnel, who began working late 1940’s, followed by Jannes Linders and Iwan Baan, and concluding with Ossip van Duivenbode, whose work is from the last decade. The four photographers in this exhibition capture a wide variety of Dutch architecture in their images: from the work of the distinguished Nieuwe Bouwen (Dutch Modernism) architects Brinkman & Van der Vlugt to that of contemporary architects, such as Rem Koolhaas / OMA, Benthem Crouwel Architects, MVRDV and UNStudio / Ben van Berkel. International architects, such as Tadao Ando and SANAA, are also featured in the show. Together these photographers embody more than sixty years of Dutch architectural photography, capturing the development of the urban and architectural landscape. This presents a unique image of time and the special observation of four different photographers, who are inviting the audience to look with a different perspective than the eye of the architect. The Gallery Club is a platform for photography, organized around exhibitions, dinners and events. Every edition of The Gallery Club explores the work of a wide range of Dutch and international photographers through a different theme. www.thegalleryclub.com Jan Versnel 1924-2007 Photographer Jan Versnel is the most influential architectural photographer of his generation, known for his immaculate images of architecture, interiors and products. Contemporary architectural photographers see him as the pioneer of Dutch architectural photography and consider his work an important inspiration for the entire discipline.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Design Concepts in the Nineties. Theoretical Models of UN
    Ŕ periodica polytechnica Making design concepts in the nineties. Architecture Theoretical models of UN Studio 40/2 (2009) 55–63 doi: 10.3311/pp.ar.2009-2.02 Zoltán Bun web: http://www.pp.bme.hu/ar c Periodica Polytechnica 2009 RESEARCH ARTICLE Received 2010-02-18 Abstract At the very end of the 1980s, the previously determinative Attending to the thinking of the second half of the twentieth past that had been incarcerated in the museum and globalisa- century there has been a shift from the related-causal image tion hand in hand with capitalism were to change gear to turbo- of science to a kind of classification (the examination of local boost. ‘Poststructuralism’ was at war with ‘postmodernism’, singularities), from closed disciplines to their in-betweenness, both in general and architectural thinking. Following difference- from abstract views to pragmatic, then in the territory of archi- philosophy and other social studies, architectural deconstruc- tecture from the direct representation of drawings to generative- tion had questioned the logos-centrism of the discipline and it organisational model of a diagram, from reactive-post-critical had success and great influence in the fields of liberating var- theory to a proactive and productive one. Pluralism and rela- ious layers of rigid structures and rules. The abstract theory, tivity has taken the place of dominating and universal modes of a kind of ‘textual organisation’ that meets material world, did thought, discrete-networked models have been playing a lead- not just pose important questions but it caused serious problems ing role beside continuous-linear ones, as have digital aspects itself: theory made an elitist exodus from everyday life, differ- beside analogue ones, as blob forms beside boxes.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Works Contents
    selected works Contents Contact 02 Profile 05 Architecture Cultural 21 Infrastructure 47 Office & Commercial 73 Residential 105 Units Urban 135 Interior 153 Product 163 Innovation Knowledge 177 Futures 189 UNSense 193 Contact UNStudio UNStudio Asia Business Development Business Development Amsterdam Shanghai contacts: contacts: Stadhouderskade 113 Machteld Kors Room 4606 Nora Schueler 1073 AX Amsterdam [email protected] Raffles City, No. 268 [email protected] PO Box 75381 Xizang Middle Road Teun Bimbergen Maggie Sun 1070 AJ Amsterdam Shanghai 200001 [email protected] [email protected] The Netherlands China T +31 (0)20 570 20 40 Marisa Cortright T +86 21 6340 5088 Sarah Zheng F +31 (0)20 570 20 41 [email protected] F +86 21 3366 3302 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Giulia Carravieri www.unstudio.com www.unstudio.com [email protected] Niki Pliakogianni 中国上海市西藏中路268号 Frankfurt [email protected] 来福士广场办公楼4606室 邮编 200001 Carleigh Shannon An der Welle 4 #528 [email protected] 60322 Frankfurt Germany Hong Kong T +49 69 6593 7580 [email protected] Room 1102-1105 Yu Yuet Lai Building 43-55 Wyndham Street UNSense Central, Hong Kong T +852 3499 1261 F +852 3563 8200 Plantage Middenlaan 62 [email protected] 1018 DH Amsterdam www.unstudio.com The Netherlands [email protected] www.unsense.com 4 Profile Profile 5 Profile Background About UNStudio Selected Pivotal Projects Founded in 1988 by Ben van Berkel and Acclaimed UNStudio projects include Caroline Bos, UNStudio is an international Arnhem Central Station (The Netherlands), architectural design studio specialising the Mercedes-Benz Museum, Stuttgart in architecture, urban development, (Germany), the Raffles City Hangzhou infrastructure and interior and product mixed-use development (China), the design.
    [Show full text]
  • BNA Kubus for Ben Van Berkel and Caroline Bos of Unstudio
    BNA Kubus for Ben van Berkel and Caroline Bos of UNStudio The 2016 BNA Kubus has been awarded to the founders of UNStudio, Ben van Berkel (architect) and Caroline Bos (art historian / urban planner). The aim of the architecture prize, this year bestowed for the 41st time by the Royal Institute of Dutch Architects (abbreviated as BNA), is to express the institute’s appreciation for an exceptional contribution to architecture. The Kubus was awarded on the recommendation of a jury made up of Nathalie de Vries (chair), Steven Nobel, Ton Idsinga, Wienke Bodewes, Willem Hein Schenk and Willem Jan Neutelings. The presentation ceremony will take place on 3 November in Amsterdam. Extract from the jury report The jury concluded that Van Berkel and Bos, together with their UNStudio team, are more than deserved winners of the 2016 BNA Kubus. 'No one controls the creative and technical process better than UNStudio. They prove that in-depth research pays off, as does network-driven collaboration with professionals in the fields of architecture, infrastructure and urban development. The cutting-edge nature and absolute craftsmanship of their body of work makes it both exemplary and innovative.' High quality, iconic buildings and international appeal The jury’s decision was based on three criteria: excellent craftsmanship, a recognisable and innovative body of work, and a relevant contribution to the profession. From the time UNStudio was established in 1988, Van Berkel and Bos have been building up an impressive body of work, according to the jury. Their work is always of high quality, the buildings are iconic and have international appeal.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Architecture Prize 2017
    The American Architecture Prize 2017 1 Credits President: Hossein Farmani Marketing Director: David Teravagimov Creative Director: Gordon Candelin Trophy Design: Arshia Mahmoodi, Void Technical Director: Mohammed Farooq The AAP is produced by the Farmani Group 550 North Larchmont Blvd., Los Angeles, CA USA. www.architectureprize.com Cover image Shanghai Tower by Wang Xi American Architecture Prize 2017 Jury Philip Stevens Rok Oman Klára Doleželová Elena Grigoryeva Clement Blanchet Natasha Jen Joshua Jih Pan, FAIA Leone Lorrimer Designboom OFIS Architects ARCHIP Project Baikal Clement Blanchet Architecture Pentagram J.J. Pan and Partners, Architects dwp | design worldwide partnership and Planners Peter Cerno Julie Payette Peggy Deamer Alejandro Zaera-Polo Elisa Burnazzi Carla Juaçaba Dan Howarth Jennifer Siegal Cerno+Architekten v2com newswire Yale University AZPML Architecture / Princeton Burnazzi Feltrin Architects Carla Juaçaba Dezeen Office of Mobile Design (OMD) University Troy C. Therrien Will Allsop Ben van Berkel Alan Ricks Bernard Gomez (FIA SL) Chad Oppenheim, FAIA Jennifer Marmon Amadou Issa Bore Guggenheim Foundation and All Design UNStudio / Harvard University Mass Design Group B.G.J.F Consultancy Services Oppenheim Architecture + Design Platform for Architecture + Research Le Modulor / AUA Museum Graduate School of Design Michael Murphy Graham Morrison Geoffrey Makstutis Mari a Langarita Sharon Davis Spela Videcnik Sadie Morgan Arshia Mahmoodi AIA MASS Design Group Allies and Morrison Pearson UK Langarita-Navarro Sharon Davis Design Harvard Graduate School of Design / dRMM Architects Arshia Architects Ofis Architects Sam Jacob Elisabete Saldanha Lise Coirier Chris Bosse Sam Jacob Studio for Architecture es1arq TL Magazine LAVA Asia Pacific / Adjunct and Design Professor at UTS 5 2017 American Architecture Prize Winners The American Architecture Prize encourages innovation and award excellence in architecture, interior design, and landscape architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • THOMAS REINER, P.E. Licensed Professional Engineer: CA, CT, FL, MA, NJ, NY, PA, TX (CT, TX Inactive) [email protected]
    THOMAS REINER, P.E. Licensed Professional Engineer: CA, CT, FL, MA, NJ, NY, PA, TX (CT, TX Inactive) [email protected] www.talwegstudio.com EDUCATION University of California, Berkeley. Berkeley, California Master of Science in Civil Engineering, May 2007 Master of Architecture, May 2007 Universität Stuttgart. Stuttgart, Germany Fulbright Fellowship, Sep. 2005 – July 2006 Institut für Leichtbau Entwerfen und Konstruieren (ILEK) The Institute for Lightweight Design and Construction University of Arizona. Tucson, Arizona Bachelor of Architecture, magna cum laude and Honors, May 2001 Universität Stuttgart. Stuttgart, Germany Arizona‐Baden Württemberg Exchange Program, March – Aug. 2000 PROFESSIONAL Professional Engineer, California. License #C75211 LICENSING Professional Engineer, Connecticut. License #PEN.0028146 (Inactive, but can be re‐activated) Professional Engineer, Florida. License #84973 Professional Engineer, Massachusetts. License #54139 (Structural) Professional Engineer, New Jersey. License #5376700 Professional Engineer, New York. License #094767 Professional Engineer, Pennsylvania. License #086167 Professional Engineer, Texas. License #112350 (Inactive, but can be re‐activated) NCEES Record #17‐175‐26. (NCEES record may be used to obtain P.E. licenses for other states as required for project work) PROFESSIONAL Talweg Engineering Studio D.P.C., New York City, May 2017 ‐ Present EXPERIENCE Principal . Aleisa Family Khozama II Residences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. (2018‐ongoing) Architect: Worksbureau . Beyond Office Renovation, New York City. (2018‐ongoing) Architect: Condition . Aleisa Family Mahdeya Residences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. (2017‐18) Architect: Worksbureau ARUP, New York City, Jan. – April 2017 Senior Engineer (Temporary Contract) . Mexico City New International Airport, Mexico City, Mexico. (2017) Architect: Foster + Partners with Fernando Romero Knippers Helbig Inc., Stuttgart, Germany & New York City, Oct. 2010 – Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • A Model to Interpret Bio-Inspired Design and Its Impact on Design Curricula
    A MODEL TO INTERPRET BIO-INSPIRED DESIGN AND ITS IMPACT ON DESIGN CURRICULA A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School of Engineering and Sciences of İzmir Institute of Technology in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Architecture by Cansu GÜNAYDIN October 2019 İZMİR ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I want to thank Prof. Dr. Fehmi Doğan, my supervisor, who shared his experience and knowledge. I want to thank him not just for the thesis; he supported me throughout my whole process with his physical and mental presence. I'm grateful to him for all the things which he presented me with sincerity and tolerance. Secondly, I would like to thank especially my co-advisor Dr. Altuğ Kasalı, who was a great mentor leading me towards the academic path and wishfully contributed a lot to my thesis with his invaluable ideas. I would also like to thank to my thesis committee members Assoc. Prof. Dr. Tonguç Akış and Assoc. Prof. Dr. Aslı Ceylan Öner for their valuable time, comments and suggestions. Thanks to my all of friends for their invaluable support and motivation during the study. Last but not least, I want to thank my dear family, for their endless trust, motivation and lifelong support, simply for being my family. I’m grateful them for everything in my life. Thanks to all of them! ABSTRACT A MODEL TO INTERPRET BIO-INSPIRED DESIGN AND ITS IMPACT ON DESIGN CURRICULA Inspirations from nature is widely used in the field of design. Rising concerns about the irreversible and hazardous effects of humankind, direct the developments in the field of design and technology once again to nature.
    [Show full text]