DOCSLIB.ORG

附文档1 中国被子植物科属范畴变动总览docs 1 a Summary of Revised Familial and Generic Circumscriptions Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
附文档1 中国被子植物科属范畴变动总览docs 1 a Summary of Revised Familial and Generic Circumscriptions Of 刘冰, 叶建飞, 刘夙, 汪远, 杨永, 赖阳均, 曾刚, 林秦文. 中国被子植物科属概览: 依据APG III系统. 生物多样性, 2015, 23(2): 225-231. http://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=9992 附文档 1 中国被子植物科属范畴变动总览 Docs 1 A summary of revised familial and generic circumscriptions of Chinese angiosperms 以下的科范畴变动主要论述相对于《中国植物志》的变化, 属范畴变动则论述相对于《中国植物志》和 Flora of China 的全部变化及少量与《种子植物科属词典》对比的变化, 并补充了近年来新记录和新归化的属。 为了节省篇幅, 略去了《中国植物志》已有记载的归化或引种属, 仅列于附表 2 中, 在引证 Flora of China 和 《中国植物志》相关科属时略去了作者和年代。引种栽培属资料来自本文作者汪远和刘冰的数据, 不再引证 文献出处。 注: 《中国植物志》简写为“FRPS”, Flora of China 简写为“FOC”, 《种子植物科属词典》简写为“科属词典”。 1. 睡莲目 Nymphaeales ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2. 木兰藤目 Austrobaileyales .................................................................................................................................. 1 3. 白樟目 Canellales ................................................................................................................................................ 1 4. 胡椒目 Piperales .................................................................................................................................................. 1 5. 木兰目 Magnoliales ............................................................................................................................................. 1 6. 樟目 Laurales ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 7. 金粟兰目 Chloranthales ....................................................................................................................................... 3 8. 菖蒲目 Acorales .................................................................................................................................................. 3 9. 泽泻目 Alismatales .............................................................................................................................................. 3 10. 无叶莲目 Petrosaviales ........................................................................................................................................ 4 11. 薯蓣目 Dioscoreales ............................................................................................................................................ 4 12. 露兜树目 Pandanales ........................................................................................................................................... 5 13. 百合目 Liliales ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 14. 天门冬目 Asparagales ......................................................................................................................................... 6 15. 棕榈目 Arecales ................................................................................................................................................... 9 16. 鸭跖草目 Commelinales ...................................................................................................................................... 9 17. 姜目 Zingiberales ................................................................................................................................................. 9 1 刘冰, 叶建飞, 刘夙, 汪远, 杨永, 赖阳均, 曾刚, 林秦文. 中国被子植物科属概览: 依据APG III系统. 生物多样性, 2015, 23(2): 225-231. http://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=9992 18. 禾本目 Poales .................................................................................................................................................... 10 19. 金鱼藻目 Ceratophyllales .................................................................................................................................. 12 20. 毛茛目 Ranunculales ......................................................................................................................................... 13 21. 清风藤目 Sabiales ............................................................................................................................................. 14 22. 山龙眼目 Proteales ............................................................................................................................................ 14 23. 昆栏树目 Trochodendrales ................................................................................................................................ 14 24. 黄杨目 Buxales .................................................................................................................................................. 14 25. 大叶草目 Gunnerales......................................................................................................................................... 14 26. 五桠果目 Dilleniales ......................................................................................................................................... 14 27. 虎耳草目 Saxifragales ....................................................................................................................................... 14 28. 锁阳目 Cynomoriales ........................................................................................................................................ 16 29. 葡萄目 Vitales ................................................................................................................................................... 16 30. 蒺藜目 Zygophyllales ........................................................................................................................................ 16 31. 豆目 Fabales ...................................................................................................................................................... 16 32. 蔷薇目 Rosales .................................................................................................................................................. 17 33. 壳斗目 Fagales .................................................................................................................................................. 18 34. 葫芦目 Cucurbitales........................................................................................................................................... 19 35. 卫矛目 Celastrales ............................................................................................................................................. 19 36. 酢浆草目 Oxalidales .......................................................................................................................................... 20 37. 金虎尾目 Malpighiales ...................................................................................................................................... 20 38. 牻牛儿苗目 Geraniales ...................................................................................................................................... 23 39. 桃金娘目 Myrtales ............................................................................................................................................ 23 40. 缨子木目 Crossosomatales ................................................................................................................................ 24 41. 美洲苦木目 Picramniales .................................................................................................................................. 24 42. 无患子目 Sapindales ......................................................................................................................................... 24 2 刘冰, 叶建飞, 刘夙, 汪远, 杨永, 赖阳均, 曾刚, 林秦文. 中国被子植物科属概览: 依据APG III系统. 生物多样性, 2015, 23(2): 225-231. http://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=9992 43. 腺椒树目 Huerteales .......................................................................................................................................... 25 44. 锦葵目 Malvales ................................................................................................................................................ 26 45. 十字花目 Brassicales ......................................................................................................................................... 26 46. 红珊藤目 Berberidopsidales .............................................................................................................................. 28 47. 檀香目 Santalales .............................................................................................................................................. 28 48. 石竹目 Caryophyllales ....................................................................................................................................... 29 49. 山茱萸目 Cornales ............................................................................................................................................ 32 50. 杜鹃花目 Ericales .............................................................................................................................................. 32 51. 茶茱萸目 Icacinales ........................................................................................................................................... 34 52. 丝缨花目 Garryales ........................................................................................................................................... 34 53. 龙胆目 Gentianales ............................................................................................................................................ 34 54. 紫草目 Boraginales ...........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Universiti Putra Malaysia Genetic Diversity of Tuba
    UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA GENETIC DIVERSITY OF TUBA PLANTS, AND TOXICITY OF THEIR ROTENOIDS FORMULATED AS NANO-EMULSION AGAINST Plutella xylostella L. NORHAYU BINTI ASIB FP 2015 42 GENETIC DIVERSITY OF TUBA PLANTS, AND TOXICITY OF THEIR ROTENOIDS FORMULATED AS NANO-EMULSION AGAINST Plutella xylostella L. By NORHAYU BINTI ASIB UPM COPYRIGHT © Thesis presented to the Senate of Universiti Putra Malaysia in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 2015 Abstract of thesis presented to the Senate of Universiti Putra Malaysia in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy GENETIC DIVERSITY OF TUBA PLANTS, AND TOXICITY OF THEIR ROTENOIDS FORMULATED AS NANO-EMULSION AGAINST Plutella xylostella L. By NORHAYU BINTI ASIB UPM January 2015 Chairman : Professor Dzolkhifli Omar, PhD. Faculty : Agriculture Rotenone found in the crude extract from the roots of Tuba plants is commonly used as a bioinsecticide to control insect pests of horticultural crops. The control obtained on insect pests varies greatly and this could probably be due to the source and process of extraction, toxicant preparation and application in the field. The need to improve the quality of the rotenone as botanical insecticide and to obtain consistent control of insect pest led to the studies with following objectives; 1) to identify the diversity of Tubaplants based on Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis, Internal Transcribe Spacer (ITS) marker and their morphological characteristics, 2) to extract, and characterize bioactive compound rotenone from Tuba plants, 3) to prepare the bio- based emulsion formulation of rotenone extract and 4) to evaluate the insecticidal properties of the emulsion formulation of rotenone against Diamondback moth (DBM).
    [Show full text]
  • Endosamara Racemosa (Roxb.) Geesink and Callerya Vasta (Kosterm.) Schot
    Taiwania, 48(2): 118-128, 2003 Two New Members of the Callerya Group (Fabaceae) Based on Phylogenetic Analysis of rbcL Sequences: Endosamara racemosa (Roxb.) Geesink and Callerya vasta (Kosterm.) Schot (1,3) (1,2) Jer-Ming Hu and Shih-Pai Chang (Manuscript received 2 May, 2003; accepted 29 May, 2003) ABSTRACT: Two new members of Callerya group in Fabaceae, Endosamara racemosa (Roxb.) Geesink and Callerya vasta (Kosterm.) Schot, are identified based on phylogenetic analyses of chloroplast rbcL sequences. These taxa joined with other previously identified taxa in the Callerya group: Afgekia, Callerya, and Wisteria. These genera are resolved as a basal subclade in the Inverted Repeat Lacking Clade (IRLC), which is a large legume group that includes many temperate and herbaceous legumes in the subfamily Papilionoideae, such as Astragalus, Medicago and Pisum, and is not close to other Millettieae. Endosamara is sister to Millettia japonica (Siebold & Zucc.) A. Gray, but only weakly linked with Wisteria and Afgekia. KEY WORDS: Endosamara, Callerya, Millettieae, Millettia, rbcL, Phylogenetic analysis. INTRODUCTION Recent molecular phylogenetic studies of the tribe Millettieae have revealed that the tribe is polyphyletic and several taxa are needed to be segregated from the core Millettieae group. One of the major segregates from Millettieae is the Callerya group, comprising species from Callerya, Wisteria, Afgekia, and Millettia japonica (Siebold & Zucc.) A. Gray. The group is considered to be part of the Inverted-Repeat-Lacking Clade (IRLC; Wojciechowski et al., 1999) including many temperate herbaceous legumes. Such result is consistent and supported by chloroplast inverted repeat surveys (Lavin et al., 1990; Liston, 1995) and phylogenetic studies of the phytochrome gene family (Lavin et al., 1998), chloroplast rbcL (Doyle et al., 1997; Kajita et al., 2001), trnK/matK (Hu et al., 2000), and nuclear ribosomal ITS regions (Hu et al., 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • The Diversity of Wild Orchids in the Southern Slope of Mount Merapi, Yogyakarta, Indonesia Eight Years After the 2010 Eruption
    BIODIVERSITAS ISSN: 1412-033X Volume 21, Number 9, September 2020 E-ISSN: 2085-4722 Pages: 4457-4465 DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d210964 The diversity of wild orchids in the southern slope of Mount Merapi, Yogyakarta, Indonesia eight years after the 2010 eruption FEBRI YUDA KURNIAWAN1,2,♥, FAUZANA PUTRI2,3, AHMAD SUYOKO2,3, HIMAWAN MASYHURI2,3, MAYA PURQI SULISTIANINGRUM2,3, ENDANG SEMIARTI3,♥♥ 1Postgraduate School, Universitas Gadjah Mada. Jl. Teknika Utara, Sleman 55281, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Tel./fax. +62-274-544975, email: [email protected] 2Biology Orchid Study Club (BiOSC), Faculty of Biology, Universitas Gadjah Mada. Jl. Teknika Selatan, Sekip Utara, Sleman 55281, Yogyakarta, Indonesia 3Department of Tropical Biology, Faculty of Biology, Universitas Gadjah Mada. Jl. Teknika Selatan, Sekip Utara, Sleman 55281, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Tel./fax.: +62-274-580839, email: [email protected] Manuscript received: 21 August 2020. Revision accepted: 31 August 2020. Abstract. Kurniawan FY, Putri F, Suyoko A, Masyhuri H, Sulistianingrum MP, Semiarti E. 2020. The diversity of wild orchids in the southern slope of Mount Merapi, Yogyakarta, Indonesia eight years after the 2010 eruption. Biodiversitas 21: 4457-4465. The ecosystem of the slopes of Mount Merapi is mountain tropical forest which is frequently affected by volcanic activities. The dynamics of the volcano affect the diversity and abundance of orchids in the ecosystem. Tritis is an area included in the Turgo Hill of the southern slope of Mount Merapi and is under the management of Mount Merapi National Park. The ecosystem in Tritis area classified as lower mountain forest and it has been affected by Mount Merapi eruption. This study aimed to do an inventory of orchid species in Tritis to know the diversity and abundance of orchids that exist in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Abelmoschus Moschatus Subsp
    Cooktown Botanic Gardens Index Plantarum 2011 Family Published Taxon Name Plate No Acanthaceae Eranthemum pulchellum Andrews 720 Acanthaceae Graptophyllum excelsum (F.Meull.) Druce 515 Acanthaceae Graptophyllum spinigerum (F.Meull.) 437 Acanthaceae Megaskepasma erythrochlamys Lindau 107 Acanthaceae Pseuderanthemum variabile (R.Br.) Radlk. 357 Adiantaceae Adiantum formosum R.Br. 761 Adiantaceae Adiantum hispidulum Sw. 762 Adiantaceae Adiantum philippense L. 765 Adiantaceae Adiantum silvaticum Tindale 763 Adiantaceae Adiantum Walsh River 764 Agavaceae Beaucarnea recurvata Lem. 399 Agavaceae Furcraea foetida (L.) Haw. 637 Agavaceae Furcraea gigantea (L.) Haw. 049 Agavaceae Yucca elephantipes Hort.ex Regel 388 Agavaceae Agave sisalana Perrine. 159 Amarylidaceae Scadoxus Raf. sp 663 Amaryllidacea, Crinum angustifolium R.Br. 536 Liliaceae Amaryllidacea, Crinum asiaticum var. procerum (Herb. et Carey) Baker 417 Liliaceae Amaryllidacea, Crinum pedunculatum R.Br. 265 Liliaceae Amaryllidacea, Crinum uniflorum F.Muell. 161 Liliaceae Amaryllidaceae Hymenocallis Salisb. americanus 046 Amaryllidaceae Hymenocallis Salisb. peruvianna 045 Amaryllidaceae Proiphys amboinensis (L.) Herb. 041 Anacardiaceae Anacardium occidentale L. 051 Anacardiaceae Buchanania arborescens (Blume) Blume. 022 Anacardiaceae Euroschinus falcatus Hook.f. var. falcatus 429 Anacardiaceae Mangifera indica L. 009 Anacardiaceae Pleiogynium timorense (DC.) Leenh. 029 Anacardiaceae Semecarpus australiensis Engl. 368 Annonaceae Annona muricata L. 054 Annonaceae Annona reticulata L. 053 Annonaceae Annona squamosa 602 Annonaceae Cananga odorata (Lam.) Hook.f.&Thomson 406 Annonaceae Melodorum leichhardtii (F.Muell.) Diels. 360 Annonaceae Rollinia deliciosa Saff. 098 Apiaceae Centella asiatica (L.) Urb. 570 Apocynaceae Adenium obesum (Forssk.) Roem. & Schult. 489 Apocynaceae Allamanda cathartica L. 047 Apocynaceae Allamanda violacea Gardn. & Field. 048 Apocynaceae Alstonia actinophylla (A.Cunn.) K.Schum. 026 Apocynaceae Alstonia scholaris (L.) R.Br. 012 Apocynaceae Alyxia ruscifolia R.Br.
    [Show full text]
  • DPR Journal 2016 Corrected Final.Pmd
    Bul. Dept. Pl. Res. No. 38 (A Scientific Publication) Government of Nepal Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation Department of Plant Resources Thapathali, Kathmandu, Nepal 2016 ISSN 1995 - 8579 Bulletin of Department of Plant Resources No. 38 PLANT RESOURCES Government of Nepal Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation Department of Plant Resources Thapathali, Kathmandu, Nepal 2016 Advisory Board Mr. Rajdev Prasad Yadav Ms. Sushma Upadhyaya Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Rai Managing Editor Sudhita Basukala Editorial Board Prof. Dr. Dharma Raj Dangol Dr. Nirmala Joshi Ms. Keshari Maiya Rajkarnikar Ms. Jyoti Joshi Bhatta Ms. Usha Tandukar Ms. Shiwani Khadgi Mr. Laxman Jha Ms. Ribita Tamrakar No. of Copies: 500 Cover Photo: Hypericum cordifolium and Bistorta milletioides (Dr. Keshab Raj Rajbhandari) Silene helleboriflora (Ganga Datt Bhatt), Potentilla makaluensis (Dr. Hiroshi Ikeda) Date of Publication: April 2016 © All rights reserved Department of Plant Resources (DPR) Thapathali, Kathmandu, Nepal Tel: 977-1-4251160, 4251161, 4268246 E-mail: [email protected] Citation: Name of the author, year of publication. Title of the paper, Bul. Dept. Pl. Res. N. 38, N. of pages, Department of Plant Resources, Kathmandu, Nepal. ISSN: 1995-8579 Published By: Mr. B.K. Khakurel Publicity and Documentation Section Dr. K.R. Bhattarai Department of Plant Resources (DPR), Kathmandu,Ms. N. Nepal. Joshi Dr. M.N. Subedi Reviewers: Dr. Anjana Singh Ms. Jyoti Joshi Bhatt Prof. Dr. Ram Prashad Chaudhary Mr. Baidhya Nath Mahato Dr. Keshab Raj Rajbhandari Ms. Rose Shrestha Dr. Bijaya Pant Dr. Krishna Kumar Shrestha Ms. Shushma Upadhyaya Dr. Bharat Babu Shrestha Dr. Mahesh Kumar Adhikari Dr. Sundar Man Shrestha Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Connecting Plants and People
    THE NEWSLEttER OF THE SINGAPORE BOTANIC GARDENS VOLUME 34, JANUARY 2010 ISSN 0219-1688 of connecting plants and people p13 Collecting & conserving Thai Convolvulaceae p2 Sowing the seeds of conservation in an oil palm plantation p8 Spindle gingers – jewels of Singapores forests p24 VOLUME 34, JANUARY 2010 Message from the director Chin See Chung ARTICLES 2 Collecting & conserving Thai Convolvulaceae George Staples 6 Spotlight on research: a PhD project on Convolvulaceae George Staples 8 Sowing the seeds of conservation in an oil palm plantation Paul Leong, Serena Lee 12 Propagation of a very rare orchid, Khoo-Woon Mui Hwang, Lim-Ho Chee Len Robiquetia spathulata Whang Lay Keng, Ali bin Ibrahim 150 years of connecting plants and people: Terri Oh 2 13 The making of stars Two minds, one theory - Wallace & Darwin, the two faces of evolution theory I do! I do! I do! One evening, two stellar performances In Search of Gingers Botanical diplomacy The art of botanical painting Fugitives fleurs: a unique perspective on floral fragments Falling in love Born in the Gardens A garden dialogue - Reminiscences of the Gardens 8 Children celebrate! Botanical party Of saints, ships and suspense Birthday wishes for the Gardens REGULAR FEATURES Around the Gardens 21 Convolvulaceae taxonomic workshop George Staples What’s Blooming 18 22 Upside down or right side up? The baobab tree Nura Abdul Karim Ginger and its Allies 24 Spindle gingers – jewels of Singapores forests Jana Leong-Škornicková From Education Outreach 26 “The Green Sheep” – a first for babies and toddlers at JBCG Janice Yau 27 International volunteers at the Jacob Ballas Children’s Garden Winnie Wong, Janice Yau From Taxonomy Corner 28 The puzzling bathroom bubbles plant..
    [Show full text]
  • Seidenfaden Malaysia: 0.65 These Figures Are Surprisingly High, They Apply to Single Only. T
    BIOGEOGRAPHY OF MALESIAN ORCHIDACEAE 273 VIII. Biogeographyof Malesian Orchidaceae A. Schuiteman Rijksherbarium/Hortus Botanicus, P.O. Box 9514, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands INTRODUCTION The Orchidaceae outnumber far other in Malesia. At how- by any plant family present, accurate estimate of the of Malesian orchid is difficult to make. ever, an number species Subtracting the numberofestablishedsynonyms from the numberof names attributed to Malesian orchid species results in the staggering figure of 6414 species, with a retention of 0.74. This is ratio (ratio of ‘accepted’ species to heterotypic names) undoubtedly a overestimate, of the 209 Malesian orchid have been revised gross as most genera never their entire from availablerevisions estimate realis- over range. Extrapolating to a more tic retention ratio is problematic due to the small number of modern revisions and the different of treated. If look for Malesian of nature the groups we comparison at species wide ofretention ratios: some recently revised groups, we encounter a range Bulbophylluw sect. Uncifera (Vermeulen, 1993): 0.24 Dendrobium sect. Oxyglossum (Reeve & Woods, 1989): 0.24 Mediocalcar (Schuiteman, 1997): 0.29 Pholidota (De Vogel, 1988): 0.29 Bulbophyllum sect. Pelma (Vermeulen, 1993): 0.50 Paphiopedilum (Cribb, 1987, modified): 0.57 Dendrobium sect. Spatulata (Cribb, 1986, modified): 0.60. Correspondingly, we find a wide rangeof estimates for the ‘real’ numberof known Male- sian orchid species: from 2050 to 5125. Another approach would be to look at a single area, and to compute the retention ratio for the orchid flora of that area. If we do this for Java (mainly based on Comber, 1990), Peninsular Malaysia & Singapore (Seidenfaden & Wood, 1992) and Sumatra (J.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Orchidaceous Additions to the Floras of China and Vietnam
    Taiwania, 48(3): 139-146, 2003 Orchidaceous Additions to the Floras of China and Vietnam Paul Ormerod(1) (Manuscript received 17 April, 2003; accepted 6 May, 2003) ABSTRACT: Literature and herbarium studies of Chinese and Vietnamese orchids have revealed a variety of new and noteworthy data pertinent to the floras of China and Vietnam. Three new combinations are proposed, viz, Bhutanthera humidicola, Odontochilus saprophyticus and Peristylus garrettii. Three new species are proposed, viz. Epigeneium mimicum, Podochilus banaensis and P. oxystophylloides. KEY WORDS: Orchidaceae, Additions, China, Vietnam. The present paper is mainly the result of herbarium and literature studies made at the Harvard University Herbaria (A, AMES, GH). Most of the Chinese materials examined were collected in the 1930’s, an era that was one of the high points of Sino-American botanical cooperation in the twentieth century. Vietnamese specimens on the other hand are poorly represented at Harvard and these mostly consist of duplicates made by French collectors, a small collection made by Chinese collectors in North Vietnam and an important set formed by Joseph and Mary Strong Clemens during their visit to South Vietnam in 1927. Bhutanthera humidicola (K. Y. Lang & Deng) Ormerod, comb. nov. Basionym: Peristylus humidicola K. Y. Lang & Deng, Novon 6: 190, fig. 2, 1996. Type: China – Quinghai, Magen Xian, Dawu Xiang, Muchang, SE of Magen, 3980m, 5 August 1993, Ho et al. 807 (holotype: HNWP, isotypes: AMES!, BM, CAS, MO). Distribution: China - Quinghai. Notes: This species represents the sixth member of the genus Bhutanthera Renz. All taxa so far assigned to this concept recently described by Renz (in Pearce et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Fruits and Seeds of Genera in the Subfamily Faboideae (Fabaceae)
    Fruits and Seeds of United States Department of Genera in the Subfamily Agriculture Agricultural Faboideae (Fabaceae) Research Service Technical Bulletin Number 1890 Volume I December 2003 United States Department of Agriculture Fruits and Seeds of Agricultural Research Genera in the Subfamily Service Technical Bulletin Faboideae (Fabaceae) Number 1890 Volume I Joseph H. Kirkbride, Jr., Charles R. Gunn, and Anna L. Weitzman Fruits of A, Centrolobium paraense E.L.R. Tulasne. B, Laburnum anagyroides F.K. Medikus. C, Adesmia boronoides J.D. Hooker. D, Hippocrepis comosa, C. Linnaeus. E, Campylotropis macrocarpa (A.A. von Bunge) A. Rehder. F, Mucuna urens (C. Linnaeus) F.K. Medikus. G, Phaseolus polystachios (C. Linnaeus) N.L. Britton, E.E. Stern, & F. Poggenburg. H, Medicago orbicularis (C. Linnaeus) B. Bartalini. I, Riedeliella graciliflora H.A.T. Harms. J, Medicago arabica (C. Linnaeus) W. Hudson. Kirkbride is a research botanist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, BARC West Room 304, Building 011A, Beltsville, MD, 20705-2350 (email = [email protected]). Gunn is a botanist (retired) from Brevard, NC (email = [email protected]). Weitzman is a botanist with the Smithsonian Institution, Department of Botany, Washington, DC. Abstract Kirkbride, Joseph H., Jr., Charles R. Gunn, and Anna L radicle junction, Crotalarieae, cuticle, Cytiseae, Weitzman. 2003. Fruits and seeds of genera in the subfamily Dalbergieae, Daleeae, dehiscence, DELTA, Desmodieae, Faboideae (Fabaceae). U. S. Department of Agriculture, Dipteryxeae, distribution, embryo, embryonic axis, en- Technical Bulletin No. 1890, 1,212 pp. docarp, endosperm, epicarp, epicotyl, Euchresteae, Fabeae, fracture line, follicle, funiculus, Galegeae, Genisteae, Technical identification of fruits and seeds of the economi- gynophore, halo, Hedysareae, hilar groove, hilar groove cally important legume plant family (Fabaceae or lips, hilum, Hypocalypteae, hypocotyl, indehiscent, Leguminosae) is often required of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Epilist 1.0: a Global Checklist of Vascular Epiphytes
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2021 EpiList 1.0: a global checklist of vascular epiphytes Zotz, Gerhard ; Weigelt, Patrick ; Kessler, Michael ; Kreft, Holger ; Taylor, Amanda Abstract: Epiphytes make up roughly 10% of all vascular plant species globally and play important functional roles, especially in tropical forests. However, to date, there is no comprehensive list of vas- cular epiphyte species. Here, we present EpiList 1.0, the first global list of vascular epiphytes based on standardized definitions and taxonomy. We include obligate epiphytes, facultative epiphytes, and hemiepiphytes, as the latter share the vulnerable epiphytic stage as juveniles. Based on 978 references, the checklist includes >31,000 species of 79 plant families. Species names were standardized against World Flora Online for seed plants and against the World Ferns database for lycophytes and ferns. In cases of species missing from these databases, we used other databases (mostly World Checklist of Selected Plant Families). For all species, author names and IDs for World Flora Online entries are provided to facilitate the alignment with other plant databases, and to avoid ambiguities. EpiList 1.0 will be a rich source for synthetic studies in ecology, biogeography, and evolutionary biology as it offers, for the first time, a species‐level overview over all currently known vascular epiphytes. At the same time, the list represents work in progress: species descriptions of epiphytic taxa are ongoing and published life form information in floristic inventories and trait and distribution databases is often incomplete and sometimes evenwrong.
    [Show full text]
  • J.F. Veldkamp (Continued from Page 104)
    BIBLIOGRAPHY: BRYOPHYTES 165 XVI. Bibliography J.F. Veldkamp (continued from page 104) * Books have been marked with an asterisk. BRYOPHYTES AKIYAMA, H. 1988. Studies onLeucodon (Leucodontaceae, Musci)and related genera in East Asia III. Notes on the systematic position of Pterogonium. Acta Phytotax. Geo- bot. 39: 73-82, 4 fig. — To Isobryales near Anomodon. ASAKAWA, Y. 1988. Chemicalevolution of mono- and sesquiterpenoids ofliverworts. J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 64: 97-108, 16 fig. BISCHLER, H. 1989. MarchantiaL.: subg. Chlamidium (Nees) Bischl. sect. Papillatae Bischl. sect. nov. en Asie et en Ocianie. Cryptog., Bryol. Lichenol. 10: 61-79, 9 fig, 3 tab. (In French, Engl. summ.). — Marchantia emarginata group, 2 species, 5 sub- species. - — 1988. Marchantiapaleacea Bertol. Karyotype analysis. Beih. Nova Hedw. 90 (1988) 95-100, 2 fig, 1 tab. — 1988. Relationships in the order Marchantiales (Hepaticae). J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 64: 47-57, 3 tab. BUCK, W.R. 1988. Another view ofthe familial delimitationofthe Hookeriales. J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 64: 29-36,1 fig. — 5 families; key; descriptions. CAP, T. & C. GAO. 1988. Studies ofChinese bryophytes. (2). Trematodon Michx. (Mus- ci, Dicranaceae). J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 65: 323-334, 6 fig, 1 tab. — 2 species, 1 Male- sian; descriptions. CATCHESIDE, D.G. 1988. The mosses of the Northern territory, Australia. J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. 11: 1-17, 4 — 95 54 new records, fig. species, keys to some genera. CHANDRA, V., et al. 1987. Calobryales: Distribution andphytogeographical discussion. Geophytology 17: 227-232, 1 map. * EDDY, A. 1988. A handbook ofMalesian mosses. 1. Sphagnales to Dicranales. iii, 204 165 British London. ISBN 0-567-01038-7.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstructing the Deep-Branching Relationships of the Papilionoid Legumes
    SAJB-00941; No of Pages 18 South African Journal of Botany xxx (2013) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect South African Journal of Botany journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/sajb Reconstructing the deep-branching relationships of the papilionoid legumes D. Cardoso a,⁎, R.T. Pennington b, L.P. de Queiroz a, J.S. Boatwright c, B.-E. Van Wyk d, M.F. Wojciechowski e, M. Lavin f a Herbário da Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana (HUEFS), Av. Transnordestina, s/n, Novo Horizonte, 44036-900 Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil b Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 20A Inverleith Row, EH5 3LR Edinburgh, UK c Department of Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, University of the Western Cape, Modderdam Road, \ Bellville, South Africa d Department of Botany and Plant Biotechnology, University of Johannesburg, P. O. Box 524, 2006 Auckland Park, Johannesburg, South Africa e School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-4501, USA f Department of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA article info abstract Available online xxxx Resolving the phylogenetic relationships of the deep nodes of papilionoid legumes (Papilionoideae) is essential to understanding the evolutionary history and diversification of this economically and ecologically important legume Edited by J Van Staden subfamily. The early-branching papilionoids include mostly Neotropical trees traditionally circumscribed in the tribes Sophoreae and Swartzieae. They are more highly diverse in floral morphology than other groups of Keywords: Papilionoideae. For many years, phylogenetic analyses of the Papilionoideae could not clearly resolve the relation- Leguminosae ships of the early-branching lineages due to limited sampling.
    [Show full text]