DOCSLIB.ORG

Comparative Study of Best European Practices of Online Content

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Comparative Study of Best European Practices of Online Content Comparative Study Of Best European Practices Of Online Content Regulation Law and policy of online content regulation, in particular defamation online, in the light of Albanian legislative proposals Kristina Irion Paolo Cavaliere Darian Pavli COMparaTIVE STUDY OF BEST EUROPEAN pracTICES OF ONLINE coNTENT REGUlaTION Law and policy of online content regulation, in particular defamation online, in the light of Albanian legislative proposals AUTHORS KRISTINA IRION | Paolo CAVALIERE | DARIAN PAVLI Authors Dr Kristina Irion Institute for Information Law at the University of Amsterdam (NL) Dr Paolo Cavaliere Edinburgh Law School, University of Edinburgh (UK) Darian Pavli Adviser to Special Parliamentary Committee on Justice Reform, Open Society Foundation for Albania/ Parliament of Albania Disclaimer The opinions expressed in this work reflect the authors’ own views and not of their affiliations nor of the Council of Europe. Citation Irion, K., Cavaliere, P., and Pavli, D. 2015. Comparative study of best European practices of online content regulation. Law and policy of online content regulation, in particular defamation online, in the light of Al- banian legislative proposals. Study commissioned by the Council of Europe, Amsterdam/ Edinburgh/ Tirana, August 2015. © Council of Europe 2015 Printed by the Council of Europe Executive Summary With the advent of the Internet a new public sphere has come into being that has changed modes of creation and consumption of media content where new actors offer online services and individual users can receive and impart information regardless of frontiers. New media and user-generated content greatly enhance the diversity and plurality of online content and allow an unprecedented parallelism of professional and journalistic content and individual speech empowering individual citizens and ordinary users. PART I - European best practices of online content regulation European best practices of online content regulation rest on the shared understanding of the Council of Europe and the European Union institutions to protect the freedom of expression online of all ac- tors. First and foremost, communications via the Internet should not be subject to any stricter content rules than other spheres of expression, thus reaffirming the overarching principle that state interven- tions into the right to freedom of expression and media freedoms in particular must meet the require- ments of strict necessity, minimum intervention, and the protection of from unduly interference. In recognition of the different roles and activities of actors in the new media environment the Council of Europe promotes a graduated and differentiated approach in state legislation that encompasses a new broad notion of the media. This approach requires that “each actor whose services are iden- tified as media or as an intermediary or auxiliary activity benefit from both the appropriate form (differentiated) and the appropriate level (graduated) of protection” in addition to individuals’ right to freely seek and impart information regardless of frontiers. The European Union policy and legislation takes a similar direction providing for tailored liability exceptions for certain online intermediaries. State actions that aim to protect individuals’ personality rights, their reputation and private life, should correspond with these principles and the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights which to- gether outline a coherent and comprehensive frameworks for the regulation of online content at the national level. The respect of individuals’ right to reputation and private life can be a legitimate limita- tion to the freedom of expression, however, measures should be calibrated according to the roles and activities of the actors in the provision of content and the interference must be balanced taking into account the type of speech, the role of the actors involved, the political relevance and public interest, among others. European best practice thus forestall any one-size-fits-all measures against defamatory online content 5 and need to be flexible so as to take into account the particular circumstances of the expression and personal characteristics of the parties concerned. Under a graduated and differentiated approach, internet intermediaries’ responsibility for hosting online content of third parties has to be determined according to the specific nature of the service they offer. The Council of Europe standard-setting doc- uments and EU legislation provide for a limitation of liability and exclude a specific duty to monitor the information they receive from users on part of hosting providers which in their role and function remain passive service providers. The European Court of Human Rights Grand Chamber judgement in Delfi v Estonia concerns a case where the defendant played an active role in facilitating the posting of unlawful third-party com- ments and was thus treated like a “professional” publisher with all responsibilities for the content on its website. This judgement, however, does not overturn the principle that “passive” online interme- diaries that provide for the hosting services would not be liable for third party content. Despite the differences of jurisprudence at the national level and with the notable exception of Turkey, European countries’ legislation does not establish a general liability regime for providers of hosting services. PART II - Albania and online content regulation Against the background of European best practices in online content regulation, the study consid- ered in particular a pending legislative proposal in Albania which seeks to introduce “liability for online publication of comments that infringe upon a person’s honour, personality or reputation” on providers of “electronic portals”. The study’s assessment of the proposal concludes that it conflicts with the graduated and differentiated approach promulgated by the relevant CoE standard-setting instruments, vastly exceeds the ECtHR interpretation in the Delfi judgement and would clash with the EU aquis, particularly with Art. 14 and 15(a) of the e-Commerce Directive. In light of the above considerations, the necessity of a legislative intervention in Albania at this time, along the lines of the Bregu proposal, appears less than compelling. It may be more advisable, as in the Estonian Delfi case which was based on the general civil law defamation rules, to allow the courts to develop more nuanced rules in this field, under the guidance of the ECtHR. With the exception of England and Wales, which undertook in 2013 long-planned, comprehensive reforms of their def- amation laws, no other EU member state has adopted specific laws for online defamation. This has allowed their court systems to gradually develop the case law, taking account of fast changes in tech- nology, information ecosystems and societal attitudes. If enacted this legislation would retrograde the advancements made with the 2012 reforms to the Albanian civil and criminal defamation laws, introduce an unorganic and unbalanced measure direct- ed against all content and hosting providers that is excessively restraining the freedom of expression online. In particular, the study identifies the following shortcomings: 1. The definition of “electronic portal” to overly broad, thus capturing “passive” intermediaries con- trary to European best practices and the EU aquis; the definition does also not allow for taking 6 COMPARATIVE STUDY OF BEST EUROPEAN PRACTICES OF ONLINE CONTENT REGULATION into account the defining characteristics of the service but automatically places the obligations of “active” intermediaries on all providers; 2. To the extent that “passive” intermediaries would be regulated the proposal contradicts with Art. 17 of the Albanian ECA which provides for a liability exception for hosting services analogue to Art. 14 of the EU e-Commerce Directive; 3. The obligation on portal administrators to prevent the publication of any offending third-party content amounts to a duty to monitor information contrary to the EU aquis; 4. The obligation would appear to apply horizontally to all providers of “electronic portals” irrespec- tive whether they are established in Albania or abroad but the proposal does not include issues of jurisdiction or consider practicalities of extraterritorial enforcement. 5. This in turn can amount to a violation of Art. 3 (2) of the e-Commerce Directive because it would alter the requirements for providers established in another member state within the coordinated field of activities; 6. The general obligations for the content and the take-down procedure do not allow for a balanc- ing exercise taking into account the type of speech, the role of the actors involved, the political relevance and public interest, among others, pursuant to the established case-law of the ECtHR; 7. The legislative proposal lacks procedural safeguards, in particular that courts should primarily as- sess whether online content is infringing third party’s reputation, or at least which requirements the notice has to comply with and other rights and means to assess and protest the notice; and In light of the above considerations, the study recommends the Albanian legislator not to adopt this legislative proposal. It should be recalled that the Estonian Delfi case was based on the general civil law defamation rules and not on dedicated piece of legislation placing a general obligation on pro- viders of hosting services for all published content, irrespective whether this is
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Can Self-Censorship in News Media Be Detected Algorithmically? A
    Can Self-Censorship in News Media be Detected Algorithmically? A Case Study in Latin America Rongrong Tao1, Baojian Zhou2, Feng Chen2, Naifeng Liu2, David Mares3, Patrick Butler1, Naren Ramakrishnan1 1 Discovery Analytics Center, Department of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, Arlington, VA, USA 2 Department of Computer Science, University at Albany, SUNY, Albany, NY, USA 3 University of California at San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA [email protected], {bzhou6, fchen5, nliu3}@albany.edu, [email protected] [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Censorship in social media has been well studied and pro- vides insight into how governments stifle freedom of expres- sion online. Comparatively less (or no) attention has been paid to detecting (self) censorship in traditional media (e.g., news) using social media as a bellweather. We present a novel unsupervised approach that views social media as a sensor to detect censorship in news media wherein statisti- cally significant differences between information published in the news media and the correlated information published in social media are automatically identified as candidate cen- Figure 1: Worldwide freedom of the press (2014). The higher the sored events. We develop a hypothesis testing framework score, the worse the press freedom status. to identify and evaluate censored clusters of keywords, and a new near-linear-time algorithm (called GraphDPD) to identify the highest scoring clusters as indicators of censor- Social media censorship often takes the form of active cen- ship. We outline extensive experiments on semi-synthetic sors identifying offending posts and deleting them and there- data as well as real datasets (with Twitter and local news fore tracking post deletions supports the use of supervised media) from Mexico and Venezuela, highlighting the capa- learning approaches [8, 4, 1, 11].
    [Show full text]
  • Media Literacy Policy in Pakistan
    Hacettepe University Graduate School of Social Sciences Department of Communication Sciences MEDIA LITERACY POLICY IN PAKISTAN Sana ZAINAB Master Thesis Ankara, 2019 MEDIA LITERACY POLICY IN PAKISTAN Sana ZAINAB Hacettepe University Graduate School of Social Sciences Department of Communication Sciences Master Thesis Ankara, 2019 YAYIMLAMA VE FİKRİ MÜLKİYET HAKLARI BEYANI Enstitü tarafından onaylanan lisansüstü tezimin tamamını veya herhangi bir kısmını, basılı (kağıt) ve elektronik formatta arşivleme ve aşağıda verilen koşullarla kullanıma açma iznini Hacettepe Üniversitesine verdiğimi bildiririm. Bu izinle Üniversiteye verilen kullanım hakları dışındaki tüm fikri mülkiyet haklarım bende kalacak, tezimin tamamının ya da bir bölümünün gelecekteki çalışmalarda (makale, kitap, lisans ve patent vb.) kullanım hakları bana ait olacaktır. Tezin kendi orijinal çalışmam olduğunu, başkalarının haklarını ihlal etmediğimi ve tezimin tek yetkili sahibi olduğumu beyan ve taahhüt ederim. Tezimde yer alan telif hakkı bulunan ve sahiplerinden yazılı izin alınarak kullanılması zorunlu metinleri yazılı izin alınarak kullandığımı ve istenildiğinde suretlerini Üniversiteye teslim etmeyi taahhüt ederim. Yükseköğretim Kurulu tarafından yayınlanan “Lisansüstü Tezlerin Elektronik Ortamda Toplanması, Düzenlenmesi ve Erişime Açılmasına İlişkin Yönerge” kapsamında tezim aşağıda belirtilen koşullar haricince YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi / H.Ü. Kütüphaneleri Açık Erişim Sisteminde erişime açılır. o Enstitü / Fakülte yönetim kurulu kararı ile tezimin erişime açılması mezuniyet
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Vetting Process in Albania
    An Analysis of the Vetting Process in Albania Policy Analysis - No. 01/2017 An Analysis of the Vetting Process in Albania www.legalpoliticalstudies.org 3 An Analysis of the Vetting Process in Albania ABOUT GLPS Group for Legal and Political Studies is an independent, non-partisan and non-profit public policy organization based in Prishtina, Kosovo. Our mission is to conduct credible policy research in the fields of politics, law and economics and to push forward policy solutions that address the failures and/or tackle the problems in the said policy fields. www.legalpoliticalstudies.org 3 An Analysis of the Vetting Process in Albania Policy Analysis No. 01/2017 An Analysis of the Vetting Process in Albania Authors: *Bardha Maxhuni, **Umberto Cucchi June 2017 For their contribution, we would like to thank the external peer reviewers who provided excellent comments on earlier drafts of this policy product. GLPS internal staff provided very helpful inputs, edits and contributed with excellent research support. © Group for Legal and Political Studies, June, 2017. The opinions expressed in this document do not necessarily reflect those of Group for Legal and Political Studies donors, their staff, associates or Board(s). All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any mean without the permission. Contact the administrative office of the Group for Legal and Political Studies for such requests. Group for Legal and Political Studies ‟ “Rexhep Luci str. 16/1 Prishtina 10 000, Kosovo Web-site: www.legalpoliticalstudies.org E-mail: [email protected] Tel/fax.: +381 38 234 456 *Research Fellow, Group for Legal and Political Studies ** International Research Fellow, Group for Legal and Political Studies www.legalpoliticalstudies.org 3 An Analysis of the Vetting Process in Albania This page intentionally left blank www.legalpoliticalstudies.org 3 An Analysis of the Vetting Process in Albania AN ANALYSIS OF THE VETTING PROCESS IN ALBANIA I.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Divide in Estonia and How to Bridge It
    Digital Divide In Estonia and How to Bridge It Editors: Mari Kalkun (Emor) Tarmo Kalvet (PRAXIS) Emor and PRAXIS Center for Policy Studies Tallinn 2002 Digital Divide In Estonia and How to Bridge It Editors: Mari Kalkun (Emor) Tarmo Kalvet (PRAXIS) Tallinn 2002 This report was prepared at the order, with funding from and in direct partnership with the Look@World Foundation, the Open Estonia Foundation, and the State Chancellery. Co-financers: The study was co-financed (partial research, pdf-publications, PRAXIS’ Policy Analysis Publications, distribution) by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) for the Information for Development Program (infoDev) by a grant to the PRAXIS Center for Policy Studies for ICT Infrastructure and E-Readiness Assessment (Grant # ICT 016). The translation into Russian and English, and publication of the web-version was supported by the Open Society Institute – Budapest. Contractors: © Emor (Chapters III, V, VI, VII; Annexes 2, 3, 4) Ahtri 12, 10151 Tallinn Tel. (372) 6 268 500; www.emor.ee © PRAXIS Center for Policy Studies (Chapters II, IV, VIII) Estonia Ave. 3/5, 10143 Tallinn Tel. (372) 6 409 072; www.praxis.ee © Emor and PRAXIS Center for Policy Studies (Executive Summary, Chapter I) Materials in the current report are subject to unlimited and free use if references to the authors and financers are provided. ISBN: 9985-78-736-6 Layout: Helena Nagel Contents 4 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Mari Kalkun, Tarmo Kalvet, Daimar Liiv, Ülle Pärnoja . 6 1. Objectives of study . 6 2. “Blue collar” individuals and “passive people” are distinguished among non-users of the Internet .
    [Show full text]
  • Women Rights and Gender Equality As Per Albanian Law
    E-ISSN 2281-4612 Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Vol 5 No 1 ISSN 2281-3993 MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy March 2016 Women Rights and Gender Equality as Per Albanian law Evelina Qirjako, Ph.D. Candidate Member of Supreme Court; [email protected] Doi:10.5901/ajis.2016.v5n1p195 Abstract Following the integration process with European Union, Albania has an obligation to progress on gender equality area. In this regard, Albania should develop a comprehensive legal framework and establish effective mechanisms to address and overcome gender inequalities, as well as efficient tools and concrete results for prevention of gender based violence, rehabilitation and integration of its victims, and concrete results for advancement of women rights in all sectors of life. This article provides an overview of albanian legislation on gender equality, and relevant reccomandations for intensification of institutional steps to achieve gender equality in Albania. Keywords: gender equality; women rights; gender based violence; referal mechanism; gender discrimination; national authority for gender equality; 1. Introduction Gender Equality (equality between men and women) constitutes substantial part of human rights. The Constitution as the fundamental law of ALBANIA, provides for the principle of equality for all citizens as guaranteed by law (Article 18.) Following this universal principle, men and women, being both subjects of the law, are legally treated equally, and have equal rights and obligations, but in real life the equality is not achieved. Gender equality may achieved when as a result of application of the law men and women have same gains and responsibilities. Gender roles impact crucial personal decisions: on education, on career development, on working potentials, on family and on fertility.
    [Show full text]
  • No Monitoring Obligations’ the Death of ‘No Monitoring Obligations’ a Story of Untameable Monsters by Giancarlo F
    The Death of ‘No Monitoring Obligations’ The Death of ‘No Monitoring Obligations’ A Story of Untameable Monsters by Giancarlo F. Frosio* Abstract: In imposing a strict liability regime pean Commission, would like to introduce filtering for alleged copyright infringement occurring on You- obligations for intermediaries in both copyright and Tube, Justice Salomão of the Brazilian Superior Tribu- AVMS legislations. Meanwhile, online platforms have nal de Justiça stated that “if Google created an ‘un- already set up miscellaneous filtering schemes on a tameable monster,’ it should be the only one charged voluntary basis. In this paper, I suggest that we are with any disastrous consequences generated by the witnessing the death of “no monitoring obligations,” lack of control of the users of its websites.” In order a well-marked trend in intermediary liability policy to tame the monster, the Brazilian Superior Court that can be contextualized within the emergence of had to impose monitoring obligations on Youtube; a broader move towards private enforcement online this was not an isolated case. Proactive monitoring and intermediaries’ self-intervention. In addition, fil- and filtering found their way into the legal system as tering and monitoring will be dealt almost exclusively a privileged enforcement strategy through legisla- through automatic infringement assessment sys- tion, judicial decisions, and private ordering. In multi- tems. Due process and fundamental guarantees get ple jurisdictions, recent case law has imposed proac- mauled by algorithmic enforcement, which might fi- tive monitoring obligations on intermediaries across nally slay “no monitoring obligations” and fundamen- the entire spectrum of intermediary liability subject tal rights online, together with the untameable mon- matters.
    [Show full text]
  • CHRIS BRONK, Ph.D. 4403 Oak Forest Dr. Missouri City, TX 77459 W
    CHRIS BRONK, Ph.D. 4403 Oak Forest Dr. Missouri City, TX 77459 W: 713.743.5593 C: 832.729.6205 rcbronk <at> central.uh.edu http://www.uh.edu/technology/departments/ilt/people/faculty/?l=bronk&f=chris PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON, Houston, TX Associate Professor, Information Sciences Technology 2020 – Present Assistant Professor, Information & Logistics Technology 2014 – 2020 Program Coordinator, Cybersecurity 2021 – Present Associate Director, Center for Information Security Research and Education 2014 – Present Research Associate, Hobby School of Public Affairs 2018 – Present RICE UNIVERSITY, Houston, TX Director – Program on Energy and Cybersecurity, Center for Energy Studies 2013 – 2014 Fellow – Baker Institute for Public Policy 2006 – 2014 Adjunct Associate Professor – Department of Computer Science 2011 – Present Lecturer – Department of Computer Science 2007 – 2011 UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO, Toronto, ONT Senior Fellow in Cyber Geopolitics – Canada Ctr. for Security Studies 2012 – 2014 SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY, Syracuse, NY Senior Research Fellow – Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering 2010 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, Washington, D.C. Senior Advisor – Office of eDiplomacy 2009 – 2015 Foreign Service Officer 2002 – 2007 SYRACUSE LANGUAGE SYSTEMS, Syracuse, NY Technical Staff Coordinator/Software Developer 1995 – 2000 EDUCATION SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY MAXWELL SCHOOL, Syracuse, NY Ph.D. in Political Science, 2006 * Dissertation: In Confidence: Information Technology, Secrecy and the State. * Subfields: International Relations and Public Administration MA in Political Science, 2001 YONSEI UNIVERSITY, Seoul, S. Korea Coursework in Asian Studies and Korean, 2001 – 2002 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN, Madison, WI BS in History, with distinction, 1995 OXFORD UNIVERSITY, Oxford, UK Coursework in International Politics and History, 1992 HONORS UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON • College of Technology Faculty Award.
    [Show full text]
  • End of News:Internet Censorship in Turkey
    https://www.freewebturkey.com/end-of-news End of news: Internet censorship in Turkey This report was published as part of the Free Web Turkey project carried out by the Media and Law Studies Association between November 2019 and October 2020. http://www.freewebturkey.com | http://www.mlsaturkey.com About MLSA and Free Web Turkey The Media and Law Studies Association (MLSA) was founded in 2017 and its main field of activity is of- fering legal protection to journalists and people tried in freedom of expression cases. As the MLSA, we aim to provide guidance to websites, media organizations and all content producers facing censorship in digital media on methods of coping with censorship, offering them legal consultancy, tools to avoid censorship and a set of internet services that would ease their efforts within the scope of the Free Web Turkey project, which we have been conducting in the field of internet freedom for a year. Besides, we bring together groups working in the field of digital freedoms and freedom of expression to organize panels, roundtable discussions, publish articles, and conduct training programs for content producers to raise awareness against censorship. Another goal of our project is to organize the network of communication and solidarity between institutions, which is one of the most essential components in combating digital censorship. To this end, we try to keep an up-to- date list of blocked URLs and create a database so that we can run a joint and more powerful campaign against censorship. While doing all these, we aim to protect the freedom of expression in the law, the Constitution and international conventions, and to exercise this right effectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Internet Censorship in Turkey: University Students' Opinions
    World Journal on Educational Technology 1 (2009) 46‐56 www.world‐education‐center.org/index.php/wjet Internet censorship in Turkey: University students' opinions * Hasan Ozkan a , Arda Arikan b a Hacettepe University, Faculty of Education, Beytepe, 06800, Ankara, Turkey b Hacettepe University, Faculty of Education, Beytepe, 06800, Ankara, Turkey Received April 30, 2009; revised May 31, 2009; accepted June 22 , 2009 Abstract The aim of this paper is to study university students’ opinions toward online censorship with references to their socio‐ political and economic variables. Considering the upwards trend and the increasing number of online restrictions in Turkey, the opinions of university students (n=138) are thought to give significant findings. The questionnaire aimed to collect data on some chosen aspects of censorship which are internet access regulation by legal authorities, online pornographic content, websites distributing illegal and crime related information and the political and religious aspects of the internet censorship. The findings about these four basic aspects toward the online censorship revealed that despite the high proportion of approval, participants have a confused and inconsistent attitude towards the issue especially within the application and the idea of censorship. In a broader aspect, the findings can be interpreted as a sign of university students’ insufficient knowledge and understanding towards the current situation and the possible future of online censorship in Turkey. Keywords: Internet; censor; censorship;
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Vetting Process in Albania
    An Analysis of the Vetting Process in Albania Policy Analysis - No. 01/2017 An Analysis of the Vetting Process in Albania www.legalpoliticalstudies.org 3 An Analysis of the Vetting Process in Albania ABOUT GLPS Group for Legal and Political Studies is an independent, non-partisan and non-profit public policy organization based in Prishtina, Kosovo. Our mission is to conduct credible policy research in the fields of politics, law and economics and to push forward policy solutions that address the failures and/or tackle the problems in the said policy fields. www.legalpoliticalstudies.org 3 An Analysis of the Vetting Process in Albania Policy Analysis No. 01/2017 An Analysis of the Vetting Process in Albania Authors: *Bardha Maxhuni, Umberto Cucchi June 2017 For their contribution, we would like to thank the external peer reviewers who provided excellent comments on earlier drafts of this policy product. GLPS internal staff provided very helpful inputs, edits and contributed with excellent research support. © Group for Legal and Political Studies, June, 2017. The opinions expressed in this document do not necessarily reflect those of Group for Legal and Political Studies donors, their staff, associates or Board(s). All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any mean without the permission. Contact the administrative office of the Group for Legal and Political Studies for such requests. Group for Legal and Political Studies ‟ “Rexhep Luci str. 16/1 Prishtina 10 000, Kosovo Web-site: www.legalpoliticalstudies.org E-mail: [email protected] Tel/fax.: +381 38 234 456 *Research Fellow, Group for Legal and Political Studies ** International Research Fellow, Group for Legal and Political Studies www.legalpoliticalstudies.org 3 An Analysis of the Vetting Process in Albania This page intentionally left blank www.legalpoliticalstudies.org 3 An Analysis of the Vetting Process in Albania AN ANALYSIS OF THE VETTING PROCESS IN ALBANIA I.
    [Show full text]
  • Generational Use of News Media in Estonia
    Generational Use of News Media in Estonia Contemporary media research highlights the importance of empirically analysing the relationships between media and age; changing user patterns over the life course; and generational experiences within media discourse beyond the widely-hyped buzz terms such as the ‘digital natives’, ‘Google generation’, etc. The Generational Use doctoral thesis seeks to define the ‘repertoires’ of news media that different generations use to obtain topical information and create of News Media their ‘media space’. The thesis contributes to the development of in Estonia a framework within which to analyse generational features in news audiences by putting the main focus on the cultural view of generations. This perspective was first introduced by Karl Mannheim in 1928. Departing from his legacy, generations can be better conceived of as social formations that are built on self- identification, rather than equally distributed cohorts. With the purpose of discussing the emergence of various ‘audiencing’ patterns from the perspectives of age, life course and generational identity, the thesis centres on Estonia – a post-Soviet Baltic state – as an empirical example of a transforming society with a dynamic media landscape that is witnessing the expanding impact of new media and a shift to digitisation, which should have consequences for the process of ‘generationing’. The thesis is based on data from nationally representative cross- section surveys on media use and media attitudes (conducted 2002–2012). In addition to that focus group discussions are used to map similarities and differences between five generation cohorts born 1932–1997 with regard to the access and use of established news media, thematic preferences and spatial orientations of Signe Opermann Signe Opermann media use, and a discursive approach to news formats.
    [Show full text]
  • The Problems Connected with the Freedom of Expression In
    Paper invited for the International Conference: Freedom of Expression, Censorship, Libraries, Riga, Latvia, October 14-17 1998 Aile Möldre Tallinn Pedagogical Library, Estonia The era of the freedom of expression started in Estonia about ten years ago. The journals for children were the first to be freed from precensorship in the more liberal publishing policy of perestroika in 1987. After that the whole printed word was gradually freed from prepublication control. This process was not accomplished as an initiative of the organ of censorship, Glavlit, which tried to maintain its powers to the last minute, but the editors of various publications declared that they will not be subjected to the control any more. The Estonian government liquidated the Estonian branch of the all-union Glavlit in October 1990 (Veskimägi 1996 : 303) Since the proclamation of the Constitution in 1992 the freedom to express and disseminate one’s ideas, opinions, beliefs and other information in printed word or otherwise is legally guaranteed to all people. There is no censorship. The freedom of speech and press can only be restricted in the interests of protecting public order, morals, the rights, freedom, health, honour and good name of other people. The criminal code provides restrictions prohibiting the inciting of national, racial, religious or political hatred, propagating violence and discrimination, also disseminating pornography and works propagating violence among minors (there also exists a special law on that). The criminal law also treats the issues of protecting people from slander and libel and concerning the invasion of their private life. Although it can be said, that the freedom to publish all kinds of publications has not been "abused" in Estonia by publishing dubious publications there have been some cases, which have brought the issue of the freedom of expression in the centre of the public interest in a negative way.
    [Show full text]